DOCSLIB.ORG

Prosody Word Stress and Optimality Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prosody Word Stress and Optimality Theory CAS LX 500 Topics in Linguistics Language Universals Fall 2000 October 19, 2000 Paul Hagstrom Week 7b: Prosody Word stress and Optimality Theory Kager (1995). The metrical theory of word stress. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.), Handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell Kager (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1) Alabama (Ala)(bama) * (2) x x x x x x x Alabama (3) word qp ws 33 swsw A la bam a Word stress—crosslinguistic preferences (4) Stressability: Words have to be big enough to carry a stress. Minimal word requirement. (5) a. íky4s /k-y4-s/ ‘I put it’ Mohawk b. íktats /k-tat-s/ ‘I offer it’ c. í:keks /k-ek-s/ ‘I eat’ d. íkya÷ks /k-ya÷k-s/ ‘I cut it’ (6) a. s÷aal/s÷al/ ‘ask (masc. sg.)’ Levantine Arabic b. idrus /drus/ ‘study’ Iraqi Arabic (7) Demarcation: Words should have stress near the edge. Crosslinguistically popular: Initial, Penultimate, Final. (Primary stress) (8) a. púli˜kalatju ‘we (sat) on the hill’ Pintupi b. yapurukitaneháse ‘verily to climb’ Warao c. ak¨netepál ‘times’ Weri (9) Rhythm: Bounded. Avoiding lapses and clashes (alternating stress) (10) tjiÆiri˜ulampatju Pintupi (tjí.Æi).(rì.˜u).(làm.pa).tju ‘the fire for our benefit flared up.’ (11) a. yapurukitanehase Warao (yà.pu).(rù.ki).(tà.ne).(há.se) ‘verily to climb’ b. enahoroahakutai e.(nà.ho).(rò.a).(hà.ku).(tá.i) ‘the one who caused him to eat’ Hungarian: main stress initial, secondary stress on odd-numbered syllables. (12) a. bóldog ‘happy’ b. bóldogsà:g ‘happiness’ c. bóldogtàlan ‘unhappy’ d. bóldogtàlansà:g ‘unhappiness’ e. légesˇlègmegèngestèlhetètlenèbbeknèk ‘to the most irreconcilable ones’ (13) a. σ´ σ b. σ´ σ σ` c. σ´ σ σ` σ d. σ´ σ σ` σ σ` e. σ´ σ σ` σ σ` σ σ` σ σ` σ σ` σ σ` Pintupi: like Hungarian, except no stress on the final syllable (14) a. pá˜a ‘earth’ b. tjúˇaya ‘many’ c. máÆawàna ‘through from behind’ d. púÆi˜kàlatju ‘we (sat) on the hill’ e. tjámulìmpatjù˜ku ‘our relation’ f. ˇíÆirì˜ulàmpatju ‘the fire for our benefit flared up’ g. kúranjùlulìmpatjùïa ‘the first one (who is) our relation’ (15) a. σ´ σ b. σ´ σ σ c. σ´ σ σ` σ d. σ´ σ σ` σ σ e. σ´ σ σ` σ σ` σ f. σ´ σ σ` σ σ` σ σ g. σ´ σ σ` σ σ` σ σ` σ (16) Foot dominance: The side of the foot where the head is (the strong element). left-dominant feet are trochees (X .), bounded right-headed feed are iambs ( . X) A way to think about this is as building trochees or iambs from one side or the other. So, for Hungarian, (17) légesˇlègmegèngestèlhetètlenèbbeknèk ‘to the most irreconcilable ones’ (σ´ σ) (σ´ σ) (σ´ σ) (σ´ σ) (σ´ σ) (σ´ σ) … (σ´ σ) (σ´ σ) (σ´ σ) (σ´ σ)(σ´ σ) (σ´ σ) (σ´ σ) (σ´ σ) (σ´ σ) (σ´ σ)(σ´ σ)(σ´ σ) (σ´) When we get to the last syllable, we can’t build a trochee, so we just make a one-syllable foot. But in Pintupi, we can’t build a trochee, so we leave the syllable out. (18) ˇíÆirì˜ulàmpatju ‘the fire for our benefit flared up’ (σ´ σ) (σ´ σ)(σ´ σ) (σ´ σ)(σ´ σ)(σ´ σ) (σ´ σ)(σ´ σ)(σ´ σ)σ In both cases, the primary stress is the leftmost stress. Left-dominant, right-to left… Warao: main stress penultimate, secondary on even syllables counting from end (19) a. yà.pu.rù.ki.tà.ne.há.se ‘verily to climb’ b. e.nà.ho.rò.a.hà.ku.tá.i ‘one who caused him to eat’ Right-dominant, left-to-right. Araucanian: main stress on the second syllable, secondary on following even (20) a. e.lú.a.è.new ‘he will give me’ b. ki.mú.fa.lù.wu.lày ‘he pretended not to know’ Right-dominant, right-to-left… Weri: main stress on final syllable, secondary on preceding odd (21) a. ulùamít ‘mist’ b. àkunètepál ‘times’ Unbounded. One stress per word, allow long lapses (more rare) (22) Quantity sensitivity: “Heavy” syllables attract stress. Some languages care about heavy syllables, some don’t. Seminole/Creek (23) a. cokó ‘house’ b. osána ‘otter’ c. pomosaná ‘our otter’ d. anokicíta ‘to love’ e. amanokicitá ‘to love mine’ f. amanokicakíta ‘to love mine (pl.subj.)’ (24) a. σ σ´ b. σ σ´ σ c. σ σ σ σ´ d. σ σ σ σ´ σ e. σ σ σ σ σ σ´ f. σ σ σ σ σ σ´ σ Only the primary stress realized, but still counts from the left in iambs. If there is a heavy syllable, the counting starts over (25) a. ta…skitá ‘to jump (sg. subj.)’ b. ta…shokíta ‘to jump (dual subj.)’ c. toko˚hokíta ‘to run (dual subj.)’ d. nihá… ‘lard’ e. hitotí… ‘snow’ (26) a. σ σ σ´ b. σ σ σ´ σ c. σ σ σ σ´ σ d. σ σ´ e. σ σ σ´ (27) IAMB: Form (σ σ´ ) if possible, otherwise form (σ´ ). Constructing a system to predict and account for stress. (28) word qp ws 33 swsw A la bam a (29) a. word b. word 31 FS FW F 11 3 σσ σσ cón tèst tém pest So, there are (prosodic) words, feet, and syllables (so far). Distinctions in syllable weight which are encoded by moras. But what counts as heavy differs a little bit from language to language: (30) CV light CVC light or heavy CVV heavy VV heavy The idea is that heavy syllables have two of something that light syllables only have one of. The unit of weight is the mora, and it is represented in the prosodic structures. All vowels have a distinct mora, onsets do not (the presence of onsets never seems to contribute to a syllable’s weight class), codas do sometimes: (31) σσ qgp 3 C µµ C µ t 11 t 1 VV V aa a (32) σσ qgp 3 C µµ C µ t 11 t 3 VC VC ap ap The intuition about stress in words is that it indicates groupings of syllables (the feet), each group having a prominent syllable (a head). Prosodic structure: PrWd 1 Foot 1 σ 1 µ 1 x PrWd Ft Ft σ σ σ µµµ µ p í s k %´ lan ‘It rains so hard that it is dark or hard to see’ (Passamaquoddy) Hixkaryana (33) a. to.ró….no ‘small bird’ b. ne.mó….ko.tó….no ‘it fell’ IAMBIC A foot is like this: (LH) or (H) if it has to be. PARSE-SYLL Syllables are contained in feet. WSP Heavy syllables are stressed, stressed syllables should be heavy. ALL-FEET-L Every foot is at the left edge of the PrWd. We can tell: IAMBIC >> PARSE-SYLL It’s more important to have feet of (LH) shape than to foot all syllables. (34) a.tßó….wo.wo ‘wind’ What’s wrong here? Why didn’t it come out as *a.tßó….wo.wó…? NONFINALITY No foot is final in PrWd. So, it seems: NONFINALITY >> PARSE-SYLL What’s wrong with *a.tßó….wó….wo? This is getting hard to keep track of... /a.tßo.wo.wo/ NONFINALITY IAMBIC PARSE-SYLL (a.tßó…).(wó…).wo *! * ☞ (a.tßó…).wo.wo ** (a.tßó…).(wo.wó…)*! (35) kwá….ja ‘red and green macaw’ /kwa.ja/ NONFINALITY IAMBIC PARSE-SYLL (kwa.já…)*! ☞ (kwá…).ja * * NONFINALITY >> IAMBIC >> PARSE-SYLL (36) a. ák.ma.tá….rπ ‘branch’ b. tóh.ku.rjé….ho.na ‘to Tohkurye’ c. tóh.ku.rjé….ho.ná….ha.ßá….ha ‘finally to Tohkurye’ These seem to be stressing odd syllables… why? Oh, and the vowels aren’t lengthening. (37) a. nák. ˜óh.yátß.ke.ná….no ‘they were burning it.’ b. kha.ná….n-íh.no ‘I taught it’ c. mπ.há….na.n-íh.no ‘You taught him’ Demuth (1995). Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. NELS 25. (38) Stage I: Core syllables: CV Stage II: Minimal words/binary feet a. Core syllables: CVCV b. Closed syllables: CVC c. Vowel length distinction: CVV Stage III: Prosodic words (larger than a binary foot) Stave IV: Prosodic words (target) (Demuth does this with three constraints. NO-CODA, ALIGN-PRWD, NO-DEL). /o:li:fant/ [fa] I [«ho:ta] IIa [faut] IIb [«o:fa «fan] III [«o:li: »fant] IV (39) Stage I Stage IIa Stage IIb,c Stage III PrWd 1 Ft/PrWd Ft/PrWd Ft 111 σσσσ 11 µµ Stage I: NO-CODA >> ALIGN-PRWD … >> … NO-DEL Stage IIa: NO-CODA, ALIGN-PRWD … >> … NO-DEL Stage IIb: ALIGN-PRWD … >> … NO-DEL … >> … NO-CODA Stage III *COMPLEX … >> … NO-DEL, ALIGN-PRWD … >> … NO-CODA Stage IV NO-DEL, ALIGN-PRWD … >> … NO-CODA, *COMPLEX CAS LX 500 Language Universals HOMEWORK #7 DUE TUESDAY OCTOBER 24 Wargamay (Australia) (i) báda ‘dog’ (ii) gagára ‘dilly bag’ (iii) gídawùlu ‘freshwater jewfish’ (iv) durágaymìri ‘Niagara Vale-from’ 1. State the generalizations about the position of primary (´) and secondary (`) stress. 2. Suppose we have the following constraints in universal grammar: TROCHEE: Feet look like (σ´ σ) IAMB: Feet look like (σ σ´) ALL-FEET-R All feet should be at the right edge of the PrWd. ALL-FEET-L All feet should be at the left edge of the PrWd. First, determine the ranking (for Wargamay) of TROCHEE with respect to IAMB, and ALL- FEET-R with respect to ALL-FEET-L. (Is it more important to have trochees or iambs in Wargamay? Is it more important for the feet to be lined up at the left edge of the word or the right edge of the word in Wargamay).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rhythm and Meter in Macbeth Iambic Pentameter (Nobles)
    Grade 9 Analysis- Rhythm and Meter in Macbeth Iambic Pentameter (Nobles) What is it? Shakespeare's sonnets are written predominantly in a meter called iambic pentameter, a rhyme scheme in which each sonnet line consists of ten syllables. The syllables are divided into five pairs called iambs or iambic feet. An iamb is a metrical unit made up of one unstressed syllable followed by one stressed syllable. An example of an iamb would be good BYE. A line of iambic pentameter flows like this: baBOOM / baBOOM / baBOOM / baBOOM / baBOOM. Why does Shakespeare use it? When Shakespeare's characters speak in verse (iambic pentameter), they are usually the noble (aristocratic) characters, and their speech represents their high culture and position in society. It gives the play a structured consistency, and when this is changed in instances of prose such as when Macbeth writes to Lady Macbeth and when Lady Macduff talks with her son, these are normally instances where a situation is abnormal e.g. when the Porter babbles in his drunken haze. Trochaic Tetrameter (Witches) What is it? Trochaic tetrameter is a rapid meter of poetry consisting of four feet of trochees. A trochee is made up of one stressed syllable followed by one unstressed syllable (the opposite of an iamb). Here is the flow of a line of trochaic tetrameter: BAboom / BAboom / BAboom / BAboom. Why does Shakespeare use it? The witches’ speech patterns create a spooky mood from the start of the scene. Beginning with the second line, they speak in rhyming couplets of trochaic tetrameter. The falling rhythm and insistent rhyme emphasize the witchcraft they practice while they speak—boiling some sort of potion in a cauldron.
    [Show full text]
  • Definitions & Identify 1. Which of the Following Is A
    Check for Understanding: Definitions & Identify 1. Which of the following is a definition of an iamb? (Short = unstressed, long = stressed) a. 1 short syllable followed by another short syllable b. 1 short syllable followed by a long syllable c. 1 long syllable followed by another long syllable d. 1 long syllable followed by a short syllable 2. Which of these words is an iamb? a. Employ b. Coffee c. Drinking d. Eat 3. Which of these words is not an iamb? a. Unfit b. Unwell c. Behold d. Freedom 4. What is the definition of a metrical foot? a. A syllable b. A group of 5 or more syllables c. A rhyme scheme in a poem d. A group of 2-3 syllables that form a rhythmic unit 5. All of these are types of metrical feet except – a. Iamb b. Trochee c. Spondee d. Taradactyl e. Dactyl 6. True or False: A metrical foot can only be one word. a. True b. False 7. True or False: An iamb must be more than one word. a. True b. False 8. True or False: Poems that rhyme have meter. a. True b. False 9. True or False: Poems that do not rhyme have meter. a. True b. False 10. True or False: A poem’s meter cannot change throughout a poem. a. True b. False Answer KEY 1. Which of the following is a definition of an iamb? (Short = unstressed, long = stressed) a. 1 short syllable followed by another short syllable b. 1 short syllable followed by a long syllable c.
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking in Song
    THINKING IN SONG Prosody, Text-Setting and Music Theory in Eighteenth-Century Germany A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Martin Kuester January 2012 © 2012 Martin Kuester THINKING IN SONG Prosody, Text-Setting and Music Theory in Eighteenth-Century Germany Martin Kuester, Ph.D. Cornell University 2012 Eighteenth-century music theorists habitually used terms that were apparently im- ported from grammar, rhetoric and poetics. While historians of music theory have commonly described these words as reflecting metaphorical attempts to understand music by analogy with language, this study emphasizes their technical value, especially with respect to vocal music, which includes both domains. In the case of Johann Mat- theson, Johann Adolph Scheibe, Joseph Riepel and Friedrich Wilhelm Marpurg, the literal meaning of this common vocabulary can be recovered by viewing their general composition rules���������������������� in the previously une�amined������������ conte��������������������������������t of their theories for compos- ing te�t and music of vocal works. Chapter One questions the applicability of a ‘metaphor of music as a language’ to eighteenth-century musical thought and proposes a new framework, centered on what Scheibe and others considered �����������������������������������������������the origin of both music and language, prosody. Chapter Two e�amines Mattheson’s famous minuet analysis and concludes that a prosodic sub-discipline of music theory provided a vocabulary that applied, in ten- dency, to words and notes of vocal music, simultaneously. Chapter Three traces the interaction of prosodic parameters in the longer history of ‘musical feet,’ pointing out eighteenth-century theorists’ successful efforts to adapt or re-adapt their terminol- ogy to the practice of modern vocal composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Guide to Latin Meter and Scansion
    APPENDIX B Basic Guide to Latin Meter and Scansion Latin poetry follows a strict rhythm based on the quantity of the vowel in each syllable. Each line of poetry divides into a number of feet (analogous to the measures in music). The syllables in each foot scan as “long” or “short” according to the parameters of the meter that the poet employs. A vowel scans as “long” if (1) it is long by nature (e.g., the ablative singular ending in the first declen- sion: puellā); (2) it is a diphthong: ae (saepe), au (laudat), ei (deinde), eu (neuter), oe (poena), ui (cui); (3) it is long by position—these vowels are followed by double consonants (cantātae) or a consonantal i (Trōia), x (flexibus), or z. All other vowels scan as “short.” A few other matters often confuse beginners: (1) qu and gu count as single consonants (sīc aquilam; linguā); (2) h does NOT affect the quantity of a vowel Bellus( homō: Martial 1.9.1, the -us in bellus scans as short); (3) if a mute consonant (b, c, d, g, k, q, p, t) is followed by l or r, the preced- ing vowel scans according to the demands of the meter, either long (omnium patrōnus: Catullus 49.7, the -a in patrōnus scans as long to accommodate the hendecasyllabic meter) OR short (prō patriā: Horace, Carmina 3.2.13, the first -a in patriā scans as short to accommodate the Alcaic strophe). 583 40-Irby-Appendix B.indd 583 02/07/15 12:32 AM DESIGN SERVICES OF # 157612 Cust: OUP Au: Irby Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Prosody
    Notes on Middle English Prosody Dr. A Mitchell Sound and Sense Middle English poets typically delight in the accidental harmonies and disharmonies of verbal sounds. Sometimes sound is deliberately made to echoe sense, but more often accoustic patterns do not serve a referential or mimetic function. Syncopated rhythm may just be pleasurable to hear in the voice; variation may aid expressiveness or enhance interest; or sounds may be affective or mnemonic. Sound patterns also function as a sign of the poet’s pedigree, affiliations, or tastes. But in any event critics can probably make only modest claims about the significance of acoustic effects in the vernacular – some measure of irregularity is just a natural consequence of writing in Middle English. Rhyme is the most familiar sound pattern, and it basically demands that the poetic composition be oriented around the music (not the other way around). As a result, the semantic may be subordinated to the sonic or phonetic: e.g., syntax is inverted or contorted so as to get the proper rhyme in place; rhyme words are chosen less for sense than for sound. But of course rhymes may also produce interesting semantic juxtapositions or recapitulations, and occasionally Chaucer among others uses rhyme deftly to produce harmony and discordance, parallelism and antithesis. The main types of rhyme are the following. • end rhyme (most common) • internal rhyme (within a line) • masculine (single-sllable, or when final stressed syllable rhymes as in cat/hat) • feminine (rhymed stressed syllable followed by unstressed as in butter/clutter) • exact rhyme and rime riche (on the same sounds) • near rhyme (not a failed rhyme, it has the salutary effect of avoiding monotony) You will recognize these additional sound effects: • onomatapoia • assonance • alliteration • consonance Metrics: Alliterative and Accentual-Syllabic Some Medieval English verse is alliterative (that of Langland and the so-called poems of the Alliterative Revival), but much is what we call accentual-syllabic.
    [Show full text]
  • Trochees and Iambs2
    CHAPTER III. Some Remarks on the Nature of Trochees and Iambs and their Relationship to Other Metres ‘The iambic is the characteristic rhythm of people as they talk […]. The trochaic rhythm, again, is too much akin to the comic dance, as may be seen in tetrameter verse, for the rhythm of tetrameters is light and tripping. (Aristotle, 1932: 3.8, 1408b). The present study assumes that poetic rhythm in the tonic-syllabic system current in English poetry can be best accounted for by three sets of patterns: First, an abstract matrix of expectations consisting of regularly alternating strong and weak positions. Secondly, the stress-pattern of spoken language. Some aspects of this stress pattern confirm the abstract schema (one could even say that it is from these that the reader abstracts the metric pattern); some aspects deviate from it, and produce tension. These deviations, far from being signs of imperfection, of “unmetricality”, are major prosodic and expressive assets. When the reader encounters some deviation from the abstract metric pattern, he makes adjustments in its performance, so as to preserve both his metrical set, that is, his feeling of regularly alternating strong and weak positions and, at the same time, the stress pattern of his spoken language. The adjustment frequently consists in overarticu- lation, overstressing, and additional grouping of stresses. This constitutes the third pattern, the pattern of performance. The greater the deviation, the greater the adjustment required and the tighter the additional grouping, One of the basic assumptions of the present study is, then, that the rhythm of a poem is accessible only through some kind of performance; an adequate account of a poem’s rhythm can be given only by considering the interplay of three patterns: those of metre, stresses and performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Stress and Prosody
    Chapter 3 Stress and prosody 3.1 Stress Stress in Kokota is characterised by considerable variation. Some words with a particular segmental structure may be assigned stress on one pattern, while others with the same structure may be assigned stress on another pattern. A single lexeme may be assigned stress on one pattern by some speakers, and on another by others. This variation occurs even to the extent that a single lexeme may be assigned stress variably by a single speaker. In elicitation of citation forms a single speaker may give a lexeme three times, with two different stress patterns evident. There are, however, patterns to this variation. The variation results from three factors: irregular stress patterning on some lexemes resulting from the prosodic shadow of lost morphological complexity; the gradual regularisation of these irregularities; and an overall shift in the language's stress regime from moraic trochees to syllabic trochees. 3.1.1 Metrical stress and moraic theory The following discussion of stress is couched within the framework of metrical theory (see Hayes 1995:26- 31 for an introduction), which views stress as a rhythmic structure not as a feature, and moraic theory (Hayes 1995:48-54). This approach has been adopted as it appears to most adequately allow a description of stress assignment in Kokota. In syllabic stress syllables are assigned to feet of two syllables each. In moraic stress morae are parsed into feet of two morae each. Morae represent units of weight, in which each weight bearing element constitutes one mora. Onsets are not weight bearing units.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ACCOMPANIMENT of GREGORIAN CHANT by Patricia Burgstahler A.B., Nazareth College, 1956
    THE ACCOMPANIMENT OF GREGORIAN CHANT by Patricia Burgstahler A.B., Nazareth College, 1956 Submitted to the Department of Music and the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Kansas in partial fulfill- ment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. April, 1959 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish first of all to thank my husband, whose constant interest and encouragement made it possible for me to write this thesis, and then Dr. Joseph Yasser, to whom I am deeply indebted for his generous reading of this entire manuscript, his many constructive comments and bibliographical sugges- tions, and his enthusiastic approval of this application of his quartal harmonic system. To Dr. Milton Steinhardt and to Mr. George Michael I express my gratitude for their help- ful direction and valuable advice. 11 CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS· . 11 INTRODUCTION .... iv CHAPTER I HISTORICAL SURVEY OF GREGORIAN CHANT .... l Origins . ... 2 Early Forms ...... 3 Medieval Period .... 5 Modern Period ............. 9 ChronoloF," of the Chants. 11 CHAPTER II HISTORICAL SURVEY OF GREGORIAN CHANT ACCOMPANIMENT . 14 Early Polyphonic Settings and Later Art Forms . 16 Early Tertian Harmonizations ....•.• 18 Modern Tertian Harmonizations . .. 19 The Theory of Quartal Harmony ..... 26 CHAPTER III CURRENT RHYTHMIC THEORIES 35 The Mensuralist School. 36 The Accentualist School . 39 The Solesmes School 44 CHAPTER IV METHOD OF THE PRESENT ACCOMPANIMENT . 51 Harmony ....... 52 Rhythm. 57 Selection of Chants .. 60 CHAPTER V QUARTAL ACCOMPANIMENTS .. 63 Mass I. 64 Mass IV . 68 Mass XV • • • • • • • • • • • 73 Mass XVI with Ambrosian Gloria .. 77 Credo I . 81 Tones of the Gloria Patri . ... 85 Psalm Tones . • 87 Nativity Proper: Midnight Mass .•.
    [Show full text]
  • Poetry Terms: Sound Devices, Figures of Speech, Elements of Literature, and Rhythm
    Poetry Terms: Sound Devices, Figures of Speech, Elements of Literature, and Rhythm Sound Devices Alliteration – the repetition of constant sounds in words that are close together. Assonance – the repetition of similar vowel sounds followed by different consonant sounds, especially in words close together. Consonance – the repetition of the same or similar final consonant sounds on accented syllables or in important words. Onomatopoeia – the use of a word whose sound imitates or suggests its use or meaning. Refrain/ (Repetition) – a word, phrase, line, or group of lines that is repeated, for effect, several times in a poem. Rhyme – the repetition of vowel sounds in accented syllables and all succeeding syllables. Internal – rhyme that occurs within a line of poetry or within consecutive lines. End Rhyme – rhyme that occurs at the ends of lines. Slant Rhyme – a rhyming sound that is not exact. Couplet – two consecutive rhyming lines of poetry. Common Figures of Speech – a word or a phrase that describes one thing in terms of another and that Is not meant to be taken literally. Cliché – a word or phrase, often a figure of speech, that has become lifeless because of overuse. Conceit – an elaborate metaphor or other figure of speech that compares two things that are startlingly different. Hyperbole – a figure of speech that uses an incredible exaggeration, or overstatement, for effect. Metaphor – a figure of speech that makes a comparison between two unlike things without the use of such specific words of comparison as like, as, than, or resembles. They may be directly states, implied, extended, dead, or mixed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Western Notation
    Constantin Floros Modern music notation developed out of the so-called square notation and this out of the Latin neumes. The question of where these neumes came from has long been the subject of scholarly debate. As the author demonstrated in his three-volume Universale Neumenkunde published in German in 1970, there is a very close relationship between the Paleo-Byzantine notation and the Latin neumes. Although the study aroused a great deal of dispute, more recent studies have revealed that the relevance of the Neumenkunde re- mains essentially unchallenged after 40 years. Those path-breaking research results on the relationship of the Greek and Latin notational systems are now available for the first time in a completely revised and augmented English translation. “[Floros’] work, while not giving the last word in the domain of semiology, could today certainly again be the point of departure for productive develop- ments, both in the domain of Byzantine music as well as in the area of Gregorian chant.” (Luca Basilio Ricossa) The Origins of Western Notation Western Western Notation Revised and Translated by Neil Moran The Origins of of Origins The Constantin Floros is a professor emeritus of musicology at the University of Hamburg and a prolific writer on diverse subjects. He was the first researcher who systematically examined, compared and decoded the oldest Byzantine, Slavic and Latin neumatic notations. Neil K. Moran is the author of numerous studies on European cultural history in Antiquity and the Middle Ages. His books are of fundamental importance · Floros Constantin for those interested in the Ordinary chants of the Byzantine rite and for the iconography of church singers in the Middle Ages.
    [Show full text]
  • SHAKESPEARE's SONNETS
    PROSODY: Rudiments Del Bello 2017 PROSODY: OED DEFINITION The science of versification; that part of the study of language which deals with the forms of metrical composition; OED v. prosody One way to approach English verse ACCENTUAL-SYLLABIC PROSODY from Classical Latin Some scholars (eg: Derek Attridge The Rhythms of English Poetry) feel that classical prosody applied to English is inadequate and should be replaced. IDEAS and METER • In the moment of composition, one of the central concerns of the poet is arrangement of metric pattern to achieve some kind of musicality. • Impulse toward order while allowing deviation WHY METER? WHO CARES ABOUT METER? 3 objectives: (1) increase your sensitivity to the formal properties of poetry (i.e. what sounds do) (2) heighten your pleasure and illumination in reading poetry (3) understand PROSODY (=features that have to do with how you read out verses) How does meter work? How does it mean/create meaning? • It is often a sort of ritualistic framing (metered language is different from ordinary language and thus “framed” as an artistic artifice) • It often presents variations. Departure from expected metrical norms can create an emotional effect or possibly estrangement. • It may create PROSODIC TENSION (between perfect or ideal metrical pattern and the actual rhythm) • It may have HISTORICAL MEMORY. Having been associated to a certain genre of poetry, a given meter may retain some of the meaning(s) associated to that poetry. What does meter do? • Focuses reader’s attention and refines awareness • Induces hypnosis (meter in most accentual poetry is slightly faster than the normal heart beat exhilarating effect) • Has physiological or possibly sexual overtones.
    [Show full text]
  • Prose-Rhythm
    Apuleius Metamorphoses V Prose-Rhythm These notes supplement the introductory notes on pp. 23-4 of the commentary, with some more extensive examples. Types of Clausulae1 This list covers the particularly Ciceronian clausulae, but keep in mind that often effects of prose-rhythm can be detected even when a recognisable clausula does not end a period or clause – effects such as isocolon, or even the balancing of rhythmical units within a clause. Type 1 Cretic + Trochee - u - / - x Type 1a Fourth Paeon + Trochee (uu) u - / - x Type 1b First Paeon + Trochee - u (uu) / - x Type 1c Substituted Cretic + Trochee (uu) u (uu) / - x Type 1d First Paeon + Anapest - u (uu) / u u x Type 2 Double Cretic - u - / - u x Type 2a Fourth Paeon + Cretic (uu) u - / - u x Type 2b Molossus + Cretic - (-) - / - u x Type 3 Double Trochee - u / - x Type 3a Molossus + Double Trochee - - - / - u / - x Type 3b Cretic + Double Trochee - u - / - u / - x Type 3c Dactyl + Double Trochee - u u / -u / - x Type 3d Choriamb + Double Trochee - u u - / - u / - x Type 4 Cretic + Iamb - u -/ u x Type 4a Molossus + Iamb - - - / u x Type 5 Double Spondee - - / - x Type 5a Cretic + Double Spondee - u - / - - / - x 1 This schematization is taken from John T. Ramsey (ed. and intro.), Cicero: Phillipics I-II (Cambridge, CUP: 2003). Example 1 5.12: nuntio Psyche lǣtă flōrēbat || et divinae subolis solācĭō plāudēbat || et futuri pignoris glōrĭā gēstĭēbat || et materni nominis dīgnĭtātĕ gāudēbāt.2 At the announcement, Psyche bloomed happily, and clapped her hands with the consolation of a divine child, and delighted in the glory of this love-pledge and rejoiced in the honour of being called a mother.
    [Show full text]