Global Change and Trophic Interaction Diversity: Complex Local and Regional Processes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Global Change and Trophic Interaction Diversity: Complex Local and Regional Processes University of Nevada, Reno Global Change and trophic interaction diversity: complex local and regional processes A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology by Nicholas A. Pardikes Dr. Lee A. Dyer/Dissertation Advisor May 2017 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the dissertation prepared under our supervision by NICHOLAS PARDIKES Entitled Global Change And Trophic Interaction Diversity: Complex Local And Regional Processes be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Lee Dyer, Ph.D, Advisor Matt Forister, Ph.D, Committee Member David Wagner, Ph.D, Committee Member Peter Weisberg, Ph.D, Committee Member Chris Jeffrey, Ph.D, Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph. D., Dean, Graduate School May, 2017 i ABSTRACT The structure and functioning of ecosystems across the globe are rapidly changing due to several components of global environmental change (GEC). My dissertation aims to illustrate how regional and local aspects of GEC impact diverse assemblages of species and species interactions. All organisms are embedded in complex networks of species interactions, and future efforts to predict and mitigate the impacts of GEC on ecological communities will be facilitated by such studies that incorporate a suite of species and species interactions. This study advances our understanding of how GEC will impact ecological communities by investigating two questions about GEC: 1) How will shifts in global climate cycles (e.g., El Nino Southern Oscillation), as a consequence of global warming, impact a diverse assemblage of butterflies that exist across a heterogeneous landscape? 2) What are the consequences of woody plant encroachment on complex, specialized interactions between plants, insect herbivores, and natural enemies (e.g., insect parasitoids)? Furthermore, I helped develop a tool to identify characteristics of ecological communities that are essential for promoting the diversity of trophic interactions. While the loss of species diversity is well recognized, interactions among species are vanishing at an astonishing rate, yet we know little about factors that determine the diversity of interactions within a community. Using data from a long-term butterfly monitoring dataset, I was able to demonstrate the utility of large-scale climate indices (e.g., ENSO) for modeling biotic/abiotic relationships for migratory butterfly species. Next, I used encroaching juniper woodlands in the Intermountain West to uncover that population age structure of dominant tress, such as juniper, can affect plant- insect dynamics and have implications for future control efforts in the expanding ii woodlands. Additionally, reductions of understory plant diversity, as a consequence of juniper expansion, resulted in significantly lower parasitism rates and parasitoid species diversity. Finally, simulated food webs revealed that species diversity and, to a lesser degree, consumer diet breadth, promote the diversity of trophic interactions. As ecosystems across the globe experience changes and the loss of species diversity continues, these findings offer insight into how GEC will impact species and species interactions. iii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my partner, Moria. Without your support and love, this work wouldn’t have been possible. Thank you for always being there when I needed it most. To the many adventures we have waiting for us and to all the great memories that made us who we are today. “May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view.” Edward Abbey iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my family for all of the support throughout this process. It is because of you that I developed my interest and love of science and nature. I also want to thank the Earthwatch Institute for providing me with an opportunity to work with a diverse group of citizen scientists. Teachers, students, and bankers all helped collect data used in this dissertation and it would not have been possible without their help. I also want to thank my advisor, Lee Dyer, for providing me with the opportunity to contribute to research in your lab. You have been instrumental in shaping me into the scientist I am today and introducing me to the magnificent world of plants and insects. Finally, I want to thank my partner, Moria, and our wonderful dog, Peanut, for bringing joy and happiness to my life. Life is so much fun with you two around. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... i DEDICATION ................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS .....................................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... ix INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1 – Global weather and local butterflies: variable responses to a large-scale climate pattern along an elevational gradient ......................................................................6 Abstract ..............................................................................................................7 Introduction ........................................................................................................8 Methods............................................................................................................10 Results ..............................................................................................................14 Discussion ........................................................................................................19 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................25 Tables ...............................................................................................................26 Figure Legends .................................................................................................28 Figures..............................................................................................................30 Supplementary material ...................................................................................34 Appendix A………………………………………………………………35 Appendix B………………………………………………………………51 CHAPTER 2 - Preferences and performance of Juniper caterpillar assemblages in expanding juniper woodlands of the Intermountain West .................................................57 Abstract ............................................................................................................58 Introduction ......................................................................................................60 Methods............................................................................................................63 Results ..............................................................................................................70 vi Discussion ........................................................................................................75 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................82 Tables ...............................................................................................................83 Figure Legends .................................................................................................90 Figures..............................................................................................................94 Supplementary material .................................................................................101 CHAPTER 3 - Testing the enemies hypotheses in expanding juniper woodlands107 Abstract ..........................................................................................................108 Introduction ....................................................................................................110 Methods..........................................................................................................114 Results ............................................................................................................123 Discussion ......................................................................................................125 Acknowledgments ..........................................................................................132 Tables .............................................................................................................133 Figure Legends ...............................................................................................135 Figures............................................................................................................136 Supplementary material .................................................................................138 CHAPTER 4 - Trophic interaction diversity: simulated networks generate
Recommended publications
  • Butterflies and Moths of Cibola County, New Mexico, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of San Bernardino County, California
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • MOTHS and BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed Distributional Information Has Been J.D
    MOTHS AND BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed distributional information has been J.D. Lafontaine published for only a few groups of Lepidoptera in western Biological Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Scott (1986) gives good distribution maps for Canada butterflies in North America but these are generalized shade Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 maps that give no detail within the Montane Cordillera Ecozone. A series of memoirs on the Inchworms (family and Geometridae) of Canada by McGuffin (1967, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1987) and Bolte (1990) cover about 3/4 of the Canadian J.T. Troubridge fauna and include dot maps for most species. A long term project on the “Forest Lepidoptera of Canada” resulted in a Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (Agassiz) four volume series on Lepidoptera that feed on trees in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canada and these also give dot maps for most species Box 1000, Agassiz, B.C. V0M 1A0 (McGugan, 1958; Prentice, 1962, 1963, 1965). Dot maps for three groups of Cutworm Moths (Family Noctuidae): the subfamily Plusiinae (Lafontaine and Poole, 1991), the subfamilies Cuculliinae and Psaphidinae (Poole, 1995), and ABSTRACT the tribe Noctuini (subfamily Noctuinae) (Lafontaine, 1998) have also been published. Most fascicles in The Moths of The Montane Cordillera Ecozone of British Columbia America North of Mexico series (e.g. Ferguson, 1971-72, and southwestern Alberta supports a diverse fauna with over 1978; Franclemont, 1973; Hodges, 1971, 1986; Lafontaine, 2,000 species of butterflies and moths (Order Lepidoptera) 1987; Munroe, 1972-74, 1976; Neunzig, 1986, 1990, 1997) recorded to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado
    Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 254 General Services Building 8002 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado Prepared for: Pueblo County Planning Department Pueblo, Colorado Prepared by: Susan Spackman Panjabi, Botanist John Sovell, Zoologist Georgia Doyle, Wetland Ecologist Denise Culver, Ecologist Lee Grunau, Conservation Planner May 2003 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 254 General Services Building 8002 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 USER’S GUIDE The Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County was conducted one year after the Survey of Critical Wetland and Riparian Areas in El Paso and Pueblo Counties. The projects, both conducted by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, are two distinct projects that are highly integrated with respect to methodology and fieldwork. Both projects utilized the same Natural Heritage methodology that is used throughout the globe, and both searched for and assessed the plants, animals, and plant communities on the Colorado Natural Heritage Program’s list of rare and imperiled elements of biodiversity. Each report prioritizes potential conservation areas based on the relative significance of the biodiversity they support and the urgency for protection of the site. All information explaining Natural Heritage methodology and ranks is repeated in each report, so that each report can stand alone and be used independently of the other. This report, Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, presents all potential conservation areas identified in Pueblo County that support rare and imperiled plants, animals, and significant plant communities, including wetland and riparian areas.
    [Show full text]
  • REJOINDER TU BRYANT MATHER Other Than Skippers, I Would Be Pleased to Know of It
    • FOUNDED VOL.6; NO.2 1978 JULY 1984 THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE SOUTHERN LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY, ORGANIZED TO PROMOTE SCIENTIFIC INTEREST AND KNOWLEDGE RELATED TO UNDERSTANDING THE LEPIDOPTERA FAUNA OF THE SOUTHERN REGION OF THE UNITED STATES. REJOINDER TU BRYANT MATHER other than skippers, I would be pleased to know of it. Second, Mather dislikes the SOUTHERN LEPIDOPTERISTS' NEWS 5:1 arrangement of the photographs. This was Robert M. Pyle out of my hands and often at odds with my Swede Park, 369 Loop Road suggestions. Third, common (English) names Gray's River, WA 98621 Again I had no choice but to employ them, and therefore to coin some new ones. I at­ Thank you for the opportunity to reply tempted to use names that conveyed somethin to Bryant Mather's "Critique of the about the organism better than reiteration Audubon Field Guide" (SLN 5:1, May 1983, of the Latin or a patronym would do. If page 3). As with the remarks of scores Mather dislikes my choices, that is his pre of lepidopterists and others who have rogative. A joint Committee of the Xerces communicated with me about the book, Society and the Lepidopterists' Society is Bryant's comments are appreciated and I currently attempting to standardize English have duly noted them and forwarded them names for American butterflies, so a future to the editors for their consideration. edition my be able to rely on such a list. You were correct in your editorial note I certainly agree that the sole use of com­ when you explained that I was working mon names as photo captions is highly unfor­ under constraints imposed by the Chant­ tunate.
    [Show full text]
  • Peoyincial Museum
    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA REPORT OF THE PEOYINCIAL MUSEUM NATURAL HISTORY FOR THE TEAR 1918 PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY. VICTORIA, B.C.: Printed by WILLIAM H. CULLICN, Printer to the King's Most Excellent Majesty, 1919. To His Honour Sir FRANK STILLMAN BARNARD, K.C.M.G., Lieutenant-Governor of the Province of British Columbia. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR: The undersigned respectfully submits the Annual Report of the Provincial Museum of Natural History for the year 1918. j. D. MACLEAN, Provincial Secretary. Provincial Secretary's Office, Victoria, March 7th, 1919. PROVINCIAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, VICTORIA, B.C., March 7th, 1919. The Honourable J. D. MacLean, M.D., Provincial Secretary, Victoria, B.C. SIR,—I have the honour, as Director of the Provincial Museum of Natural History, to lay before you the Keport for the year ending December 31st, 1918, covering the activities of the Museum. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient servant, PKANCIS KERMODE, Director. PROVINCIAL MUSEUM REPORT FOR THE YEAR 1918. Since the last Annual Report, although no actual field-work was undertaken, a great deal of time was devoted to the study collection in going through the specimens which have been collected from time to time and are stored in the annex. All the specimens have been rearranged, labelled, and listed, so as to make them more accessible to those who wish to consult them in the several branches of natural sciences. In this building, which is not in any way fire-proof, is stored a very large and valuable collection of anthropological material, which, if it were to be destroyed by fire, would be impossible to duplicate; this also applies to a large number of totem-poles in the basement under this building.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Sphingidae
    Caterpillar Biodiversity of the American Southwest David L. Wagner Dept. of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut Larval Characteristics - usually cylindrical - six lateral ocelli - labial spinneret - spiracles on T1 and A1-A8. - segmented (true) legs on thoracic segments - prolegs on A3-A6 and A10 (although anterior prolegs often lost) (for speed walking) prolegs with crochets (hooks) - prothoracic shield on T1 - anal plate or shield on A10 Larval Chaetotaxy and Other Structures * primary setae homologous across groups * nomenclature for setal arrangement (chaetotaxy) standardized by Hinton (1946): often (2) dorsal, (2) subdorsal, (3) lateral, (1-3) subventral, and (1) ventral setae. Family-level Taxonomy * body proportions Figures from Stehr (1987) * chaetotaxy on body and head - presence of 2ndary setae - size and length of setae - branched or unbranched setae, etc., * crochets: arrangement and size heterogeneity * proleg number * glands * thoracic and anal plates Species-level Taxonomy * color patterns helpful for most external feeders (but not so for internal feeders) * chaetotaxy on body and head * ratio of frontal triangle to head height * hypopharyngeal complex * mandibular teeth * spiracular size and color * crochet numbers Accelerated (Phenotypic) Evolution in Larvae Elasmia packardii (Central Texas) Elasmia packardii Elasmia cave (West Texas) Elasmia cave Elasmia mandala (Arizona) Elasmia mandala wagneri Family Sphingidae * large, cylindrical body * setae inconspicuous except above prolegs * horn on dorsum
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera in Agricultural Landscapes – the Role of Field Margins, the Effects of Agrochemicals and Moth Pollination Services
    Lepidoptera in agricultural landscapes – The role of field margins, the effects of agrochemicals and moth pollination services von Melanie Hahn aus Landau Angenommene Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften Fachbereich 7: Natur-und Umweltwissenschaften Universität Koblenz-Landau Berichterstatter: Dr. Carsten Brühl, Landau Prof. Dr. Ralf Schulz, Landau Tag der Disputation: 22. September 2015 You cannot get through a single day without having an impact on the world around you. What you do makes a difference, and you have to decide what difference you want to make. Jane Goodall Danksagung Danksagung An dieser Stelle möchte ich mich ganz herzlich bei allen bedanken, die mich bei der Durchführung meiner Dissertation unterstützt haben! Mein besonderer Dank gilt: … Dr. Carsten Brühl, der nicht nur meine Begeisterung und Faszination für die Gruppe der Nachtfalter schon während meines Studiums geweckt hat, sondern mich auch in allen Phasen meiner Dissertation von der ersten Planung der Experimente bis zum Schreiben der Publikationen mit vielen Ideen und hilfreichen Diskussionen unterstützt und weitergebracht hat. Danke für die hervorragende Betreuung der Arbeit! … Prof. Dr. Ralf Schulz für die Ermöglichung meiner Dissertation am Institut für Umweltwissenschaften und auch für die Begutachtung dieser Arbeit. … Juliane Schmitz, die mir während der gesamten Zeit meiner Dissertation stets mit Rat und Tat zur Seite stand! Herzlichen Dank für die vielen fachlichen Gespräche und Diskussionen, die mir immer sehr weitergeholfen haben, die Hilfe bei der Durchführung der Labor- und Freilandexperimente, das sorgfältige Lesen der Manuskripte und natürlich für die schöne – wenn auch anstrengende – Zeit im Freiland. … Peter Stahlschmidt für die vielen fachlichen Diskussionen, die hilfreichen Anregungen und Kommentare zu den Manuskripten und natürlich auch für die Unterstützung bei meinem Freilandversuch.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Grant County, New Mexico, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Natural Heritage Resources
    A Biological Inventory and Conservation Recommendations for the Great Sand Dunes and San Luis Lakes, Colorado Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University College of Natural Resources 254 General Services Building Ft. Collins, Colorado 80523 March 1999 i A Biological Inventory and Conservation Recommendations for the Great Sand Dunes and San Luis Lakes, Colorado MARCH 1999 PREPARED BY: PHYLLIS M. PINEDA RENÉE J. RONDEAU AND ANNE OCHS PREPARED FOR: THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, SAN LUIS VALLEY PROGRAM† SAGUACHE, COLORADO †P.O. Box 674, Saguache, Colorado 81149 ii Biological Inventory of the Great Sand Dunes and San Luis Lakes. Pineda et al. 1999 __________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS USERS GUIDE/BACKGROUND INFORMATION .............................................................................. IV GLOSSARY................................................................................................................................................ IV ACKNOWLEDGMENTS............................................................................................................................V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 3 STUDY AREA .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Name) (Degree) (Major) Date Thesis Is Presented
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Anthony Noel McFarland for the M.S. in Entomology (Name) (Degree) ------~~~~~-------(Major) - Date thesis is presented May 10, 1963 ------~--~~-------- Title THE MACROHETEROCERA (LEPIDOPTERA) OF Abstract approved / A continuous twenty-month survey of the Macroheterocera (Lepidoptera) occurring at a location in McDonald Forest, five miles northwest of Corvallis, Benton County, Oregon was conducted. Three hundred sixty species of moths were collected; they repre­ sented the following families: Sphingidae, Saturniidae, Amatidae, Nolidae, Lithosiidae, Arctiidae, Agaristidae, Noctuidae, Notodonti­ dae, Liparidae, Lasiocampidae, Thyatiridae, Drepanidae, Geomet­ ridae, and Epiplemidae. Information is given on the seasonal occur­ renee, relative abundance, flight habits, and known foodplants of the species collected. Biological and behavioral information is in- eluded for 82 of the species. Comparisons are made between the local fauna and that of the northeastern United States, British Columbia, and a specific locality in southern California. A new device for attracting and holding moths more effec­ tively within the vicinity of the light (a parabolic moth sheet), which does not involve the use of a trap, is described. THE MACROHETEROCERA (LEPIDOPTERA} OFA MIXED FOREST IN WESTERN OREGON by ANTHONY NOEL McFARLAND A THESIS submitted to OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE June 1963 APPROVED: In Charge of Major Chairman of Department of En Date thesis is presented May l 0, 1963 ----~--~----------- Typed by Jolene Wuest ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank the following persons, whose assistance has been of great value: Mr. William R. Bauer and Mr. Steve Buckett of Davis, California, for determination or verification of most of the moths other than Geometrid~e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lepidoptera Families and Associated Orders of British Columbia
    The Lepidoptera Families and Associated Orders of British Columbia The Lepidoptera Families and Associated Orders of British Columbia G.G.E. Scudder and R.A. Cannings March 31, 2007 G.G.E. Scudder and R.A. Cannings Printed 04/25/07 The Lepidoptera Families and Associated Orders of British Columbia 1 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................5 Order MEGALOPTERA (Dobsonflies and Alderflies) (Figs. 1 & 2)...........................................6 Description of Families of MEGALOPTERA .............................................................................6 Family Corydalidae (Dobsonflies or Fishflies) (Fig. 1)................................................................6 Family Sialidae (Alderflies) (Fig. 2)............................................................................................7 Order RAPHIDIOPTERA (Snakeflies) (Figs. 3 & 4) ..................................................................9 Description of Families of RAPHIDIOPTERA ...........................................................................9 Family Inocelliidae (Inocelliid snakeflies) (Fig. 3) ......................................................................9 Family Raphidiidae (Raphidiid snakeflies) (Fig. 4) ...................................................................10 Order NEUROPTERA (Lacewings and Ant-lions) (Figs. 5-16).................................................11 Description of Families of NEUROPTERA ..............................................................................12
    [Show full text]