Litigation 2018 Philippines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Litigation 2018 Philippines Litigation 2018 Philippines Nilo Divina, Estrella Elamparo and Camille Aromas DivinaLaw – Dynamic Lawyering (Makati) gar know-how Litigation 2018 – Philippines DivinaLaw – Dynamic Lawyering (Makati) Litigation 2018 Philippines Nilo Divina, Estrella Elamparo and Camille Aromas DivinaLaw – Dynamic Lawyering (Makati) Overview 3 General 1 Court system Give a brief overview of the political and social Describe the general organisation of the court system background as it relates to civil litigation. for civil litigation. Litigation is the primary mode of dispute resolution in the Philippines. The Philippine judicial system is organised according to the following According to the Philippine Statistics Authority, judges have an average hierarchy: annual workload of 644 cases. In 2015, the Supreme Court rolled out • Supreme Court; the piloting of a new system for speedy court trial in certain designated • Court of Appeals and Court of Tax Appeals (an institutionalised tax courts based on the proposed New Rules of Civil Procedure. Broadly, tribunal); the new rules centre on making court proceedings less adversarial by • Regional Trial Courts (RTCs); and requiring the parties to undergo two-stage mediation before actually • Municipal Trial Courts (MTCs), Metropolitan Trial Courts filing a case in court, and conducting face-to-face trials. (MeTCs) and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts (MCTCs). Activist plaintiffs are typically concerned with constitutional chal- lenges to legislative or executive measures. Civil cases generally originate in the RTCs, MTCs, MeTCs and MCTCs. The RTCs have limited appellate jurisdiction over all cases Jurisdiction decided by the MTCs, MeTCs and MCTCs within the RTCs’ territo- 4 Jurisdiction and venue rial jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals has appellate jurisdiction over all What are the criteria for determining the jurisdiction cases emanating from the RTCs. However, if only questions of law are and venue of the competent court for a civil matter? involved, the appeal must be made directly to the Supreme Court. The Venue is prescribed under the Rules of Court. Generally, for actions Supreme Court exercises appellate jurisdiction over the decisions of the affecting real property, the venue is where the real property is located. Court of Appeals and the Court of Tax Appeals. For personal actions involving the enforcement of some liability or The judiciary is independent and co-equal with the legislative and actions other than those involving real property, the venue is where the executive branches. Members of the Supreme Court and judges of plaintiff or any principal plaintiff resides, or where the defendant or lower courts are appointed by the President. any principal defendant resides, upon the election of the plaintiff. If the Courts of equal and coordinate jurisdiction cannot interfere defendant does not reside and is not found in the Philippines, the venue with each other’s orders and cannot review each other’s actions and is generally where the plaintiff resides, or where the property subject of decisions. the action is located. Venue may be waived and stipulated upon. There is no jury system in the Philippines. Jurisdiction is conferred by law. It cannot be the subject of agree- ment or waiver save in limited instances where estoppel applies. 2 The legal profession Exclusive original jurisdiction depends on the subject matter, and the Describe the general organisation of the legal nature or amount of the claim. profession. Any person who is duly admitted as a member of the Philippine Bar 5 Forum shopping and who is in good and regular standing is entitled to practise law. To Does your jurisdiction commonly attract disputes that be admitted to the bar, the applicant must be a Filipino citizen, at least have a nexus with other jurisdictions? 21 years of age, of good moral character, and residing in the Philippines. Increasing globalisation and the movement from nationalistic or purely He must have graduated from an accredited Philippine law school and domestic business models led to an increase in cross-border economic passed the Philippine Bar examination.There is no fused or split bar. activity and disputes in the country. Given the level of confidence that The Philippine Constitution prohibits foreign lawyers from engag- foreign counter parties have in national courts, and the legal landscape ing in the practice of law in the Philippines, and must be represented in general, international arbitration is emerging as the preferred mode by a member of the Philippine Bar in all matters connected with such of resolving disputes for transnational commercial transactions. Parallel practise. efforts are being adopted in the Philippines for judicial reform in gen- eral and the promotion of arbitration. 2 Last verified on Tuesday 3rd July 2018 DivinaLaw – Dynamic Lawyering (Makati) Litigation 2018 – Philippines 6 Pendency in another forum Procedure How will a court treat a request to hear a dispute that is 11 Commencement and conduct of proceedings in already pending before another forum? general Courts may refuse to treat a request to hear a dispute that is already How are proceedings commenced? To what extent pending before another forum in view of the policy against forum will a court actively lead the proceedings and to what shopping, ie, the act by a party of availing of several remedies in dif- extent will the court rely on the parties to further the ferent courts, simultaneously or successively, all substantially founded proceedings? on the same transactions and the same essential facts or circumstances, Proceedings in civil cases are generally commenced by the filing of and all raising substantially the same issues either pending or already a complaint or petition before the court that has jurisdiction over resolved adversely by some other court. A finding of forum shopping is the subject matter of the action. After the filing of the complaint, the a cause for the summary dismissal of the multiple petition or complaint. court shall issue a summons directing the other party to file an answer within 15 days. The plaintiff or claimant can then file a reply to address 7 Deference to arbitration any new issue raised in the answer. Thereafter, the plaintiff must file a How will the courts treat a dispute that is, or could be, motion to set the case for a mandatory pre-trial conference. When the subject to an arbitration clause or an agreement to conference terminates, the court shall issue a pretrial order that shall set arbitrate, including in interim proceedings? out the issues to be heard during trial, and limit the conduct of sub- Under the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004, the court shall sequent proceedings. If no settlement is reached at this stage, trial will refer the parties to arbitration where it finds that the action brought ensue within 30 days from the issuance of the pretrial order. During before it relates to a matter that is the subject matter of an arbitration trial, the claimant must produce evidence in support of his or her com- agreement. plaint or petition, and the defendant must produce evidence in support of his defences, counterclaims and cross-claims. 8 Judicial review of arbitral awards on jurisdiction May courts in your country review arbitral awards on 12 Statement of claim jurisdiction? What are the requirements for filing a claim? What is An arbitral award is final and binding and thus a party is precluded from the pleading standard? filing an appeal or a petition for certiorari questioning the merits of an A claim is generally initiated by a complaint. The complaint must state arbitral award. However, the court may vacate or set aside an award ren- the ultimate facts constituting the plaintiff’s cause of action, including dered in a domestic arbitration on limited grounds that do not relate to the names and residences of the parties. It must be verified by the plain- the merits of the dispute, eg, corruption or misconduct on the part of tiff through an affidavit attesting to the correctness of the allegations set the arbitrator. Similarly, the court may set aside or refuse enforcement out in the complaint. It shall also contain a certification against forum of an award rendered in an international arbitration on grounds that shopping. are substantially similar to those set out in the New York Convention. Notably, the Philippines is a signatory to the Convention, which 13 Statement of defence entered into force in the country in 1962. What are the requirements for answering claims? What is the pleading standard? 9 Anti-suit injunctions In the answer to the complaint, the defendant shall specifically deny all Are anti-suit injunctions available? the allegations that he or she does not admit and set out the substance Anti-suit injunctions are an unfamiliar concept in the Philippines. of the matters on which he or she relies for his denial. Material aver- However, in view of the general tenets of an injunction in civil law, ments in the complaint not specifically denied shall be deemed admit- the court may grant an injunction to restrain the parties to continue ted, except as to the amount of unliquidated damages. The defendant proceedings in another jurisdiction or forum which have been com- shall also raise all the defences and counterclaims available to him or her menced in breach of an arbitration agreement. in the answer; otherwise, they are deemed waived. 10 Sovereign immunity 14 Further briefs and submissions Which entities are immune from being sued in What are the rules regarding further briefs and your jurisdiction? In what circumstances? In what submissions? circumstances can creditors enforce a court judgment Further briefs or submissions in a typical civil case may refer to replies or arbitral award against a sovereign or a state entity? and memoranda. Even if a party does not file a reply in response to State entities are generally immune from suit based on the premise the defendant’s answer, all the new matters alleged in the answer are that the state may not be sued without its consent.
Recommended publications
  • 2015 Global Law Deans' Forum
    International Association of Law Schools 2015 Global Law Deans’ Forum A Study of Global Evaluative Processes for Legal Education and Scholarship Hosted by: IE University, Law School 25th – 27th October 2015 Madrid, Spain INDEX Welcome……………………………………………………………………….…………. 3 Agenda……………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Small Groups…………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Regional Host Schools………………………………………………………………….. 11 Singapore Declaration on Global Standards & Outcomes of a Legal Education…. 13 Madrid Protocol on the Principles of Evaluation of Legal Education…………......... 15 Self-Assessment Report………………………………………………………………... 16 Members Schools Attending……………………………………………………………. 21 Judiciary Attendees……………………………………………………………………… 23 Governing Board Attendees……………………………………………………………. 27 Attendees…………………………………………………………………………………. 32 Support Staff……………………………………………………………………………… 71 Student Staff……………………………………………………………………………… 73 Available for Download Only Appendix – Suggested Reading Material Benfer, Emily A. and Shanahan, Colleen F. “Educating the invincibles: strategies for teaching the millennial generation in law school”, Clinical Law Review, Fall, 2013 Hosier, Maeve, “Literature Review: Methodologies for the Ranking of Law Schools and the Evaluation of Legal Scholarship”, 15 February 2015 Madison, Benjamin Madison III, “The Elephant in Law School Classrooms: Overuse of The Socratic Method as an obstacle to Teaching Modern Law Students”, University of Detroit, Mercy Law Review, 2008 Patrice, Joe, “Making Law School Millennial Friendly,” Above the Law, March 7, 2014 Uelmen, Amelia, J. “’Millennial Momentum’ for revising the rhetoric of lawyers’ relationships and roles”, University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 2011 Appendix – Information and Maps 2 WELCOME On behalf of our Board of Governors, we want to welcome each and every one of you to our 2nd Global Law Deans’ Forum. We warmly welcome all the familiar faces from these many years – welcome and thank you for your continuing engagement in advancing the cause of legal education globally.
    [Show full text]
  • Isbn-13: 978-84-16399-11-6 Index
    ISBN-13: 978-84-16399-11-6 INDEX: FIRST CHAPTER: OBLIGATIONS 1) Defective Contracts in Philippine Law, by Rubén Belane 2) Inefficacy of contracts: Different categories, by Yolanda Bergel Sainz-Baranda. SECOND CHAPTER: PROPERTY LAW 3) Indigenous Peoples and Their Right to Ancestral Domain, by Sedfrey M. Candelaria 4) An introduction to English and Spanish property law from a comparative perspective, by Juan Pablo Murga Fernández 5) Acquisition from a non domino in Spanish civil law, by José Manuel de Torres Perea THIRD CHAPTER: CIVIL LIABILITY 6) The Philippine Civil Code Chapter on Human Relations and Contemporary Challenges, by Dean Perry Pe 7) Pre-contractual liability, by Teresa Rodríguez de las Heras Ballell 8) Torts in the family sphere, by José Manuel de Torres Perea FOURTH CHAPTER: FAMILY LAW 9) Philippine Law on Paternity and Filiation, by Danilo Concepción 10) Inter Country Adoption, by Maria Gabriela Roldan 11) Private law of the Philippines and Spain scientific congress. Child protection system in Spain, by Julieta Moreno-Torres Sánchez FITTH CHAPTER COMMERCE LAW: 12) Roots of modernity grounded on tradition: Select Civil Law concepts ingrained in Commercial Law, by Nilo Divina 13) Relations between the Spanish and Philippine Commercial Codes, by Eugenio Olmedo Peralta 14) Mortgage foreclosure and unfair terms in banking contracts, by Yolanda de Lucchi López Tapia, 15) Bankruptcy, an arrangement with creditors, by Nieves Jiménez López 16) How to secure the enforcement of penalties in international commercial contracts, by Ignacio Marín García DEFECTIVE CONTRACTS IN PHILIPPINE CIVIL LAW Prof. Rubén F. Balane Abstract: In the Spanish Civil Code, contracts can be rescinded in certain cases and certain contracts are considered defective for want of any of the three essential requisites—consent, subject-matter, and cause.
    [Show full text]
  • SEC Form 17-A (Annual Report) (Form Type)
    Sec Number 5223 File Number _____ Equitable PCI Bank Tower I, Makati Ave. cor. H.V. dela Costa St., Makati City (Company’s Address) (632) 840-7000 (Telephone Number) December 31, 2005 (Fiscal Year Ending) (month/day/year) SEC Form 17-A (Annual Report) (Form Type) 1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SEC FORM 17-A ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE SECURITIES REGULATION CODE AND SECTION 141 OF THE CORPORATION CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES 1. For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2005 2. SEC Identification Number: 5223 3. BIR Tax Identification No.: 000-453-086 1. Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter: EQUITABLE PCI BANK, INC. 5. Philippines 6. (SEC Use Only) Province, Country or other jurisdiction of Industry Classification Code incorporation or organization 7. Equitable PCI Bank Tower I Makati Ave. cor H.V. de la Costa St. Makati City, Metro Manila Address of principal office 8. (632) 840-7000 ______ Issuer’s telephone number, including area code 9. Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report. 10. Securities registered pursuant to Sections 8 and 12 of the SRC, or Sec. 4 and 8 of the RSA Number of Shares of Common Stock Title of Each Class Outstanding and Amount of Debt Outstanding Common shares 727,003,345 11. Are any or all of these securities listed on a Stock Exchange? YES [ x ] NO [ ] Name of Stock Exchange: Philippine Stock exchange, Inc. Class of Securities Listed: Common Shares 12. Check whether the issuer: (a) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 17 of the SRC and SRC Rule 17 thereunder or Section 11 of the RSA and RSA Rule 11(a) -1 thereunder, and Sections 26 and 141 of The Corporation Code of the Philippines during the preceding twelve (12) months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); YES [ x ] NO [ ] (b) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume I, Issue No.1
    September to Volume I December 2012 Issue no. 1 The Official Publication of the Foundation for Liberty & Prosperity Professorial Chairs CONTENTS Program Launched First Female Chief Justice ................................. 2 The FLP: A Brief Backgrounder ........................ 3 he Foundation for Liberty and Prosperity Dean Candelaria of the Ateneo Law School . formally launched the ten “Chief Justice delivers first professorial lecture ....................... 5 Artemio V. Panganiban Professorial Chairs T The Making of “Ageless Passion” ....................... 6 on Liberty and Prosperity” on September 18, 2012 at the Metrobank Auditorium, Metrobank Plaza, “Katarungan”, a Filipino concept of Justice . Gil Puyat Avenue, Makati, with Chief Justice Maria by DLSU College of Law Dean Diokno ............. 8 Lourdes P. A. Sereno as guest of honor and speaker. Seven of the ten recipients received their “Certificates of Entitlement” and “Plaques of Recognition” from Chief Justice Sereno, Retired Chief Justice Artemio V. Panganiban (FLP Chair), Dr. George S. K, Ty (Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Metrobank Foundation which co-sponsored the project) and Mr. Jose Maria Lim (President Metro Pacific Investments Corporation, another sponsor). The recipients are (in alphabetical order) retired Supreme Court (Photo) From left to right are Philippine Judicial Academy Justice Adolfo S. Azcuna (Chancellor of the Chancellor Adolfo Azcuna, Far Eastern University Law Dean Philippine Judicial Academy), Dean Andres Andres Bautista, Ateneo de Manila Law Dean Sedfrey Candelaria, D. Bautista (Far Eastern University Institute Metrobank Foundation Chairman George Ty, Retired Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban, Former President Fidel V. Ramos, Chief Justice of Law), Dean Sedfrey M. Candelaria (Ateneo Maria Lourdes Sereno, Metro Pacific Investments Corporation De Manila School of Law), Dean Danilo L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Global Law Deans' Forum
    International Association of Law Schools 2015 Global Law Deans’ Forum A Study of Global Evaluative Processes for Legal Education and Scholarship Hosted by: IE University, Law School 25th – 27th October 2015 Madrid, Spain INDEX Welcome……………………………………………………………………….…………. 3 Agenda……………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Small Groups…………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Regional Host Schools………………………………………………………………….. 11 Singapore Declaration on Global Standards & Outcomes of a Legal Education…. 13 Madrid Protocol on the Principles of Evaluation of Legal Education…………......... 15 Self-Assessment Report………………………………………………………………... 16 Schools Attending………………………………………………………………………. 21 Judiciary Attendees……………………………………………………………………… 23 Governing Board Attendees……………………………………………………………. 27 Attendees…………………………………………………………………………………. 32 Support Staff……………………………………………………………………………… 68 Student Staff……………………………………………………………………………… 70 Available for Download Only Appendix – Suggested Reading Material Benfer, Emily A. and Shanahan, Colleen F. “Educating the invincibles: strategies for teaching the millennial generation in law school”, Clinical Law Review, Fall, 2013 Hosier, Maeve, “Literature Review: Methodologies for the Ranking of Law Schools and the Evaluation of Legal Scholarship”, 15 February 2015 Madison, Benjamin Madison III, “The Elephant in Law School Classrooms: Overuse of The Socratic Method as an obstacle to Teaching Modern Law Students”, University of Detroit, Mercy Law Review, 2008 Patrice, Joe, “Making Law School Millennial Friendly,” Above the Law, March 7, 2014 Uelmen, Amelia, J. “’Millennial Momentum’ for revising the rhetoric of lawyers’ relationships and roles”, University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 2011 Appendix – Information and Maps 2 WELCOME On behalf of our Board of Governors, we want to welcome each and every one of you to our 2nd Global Law Deans’ Forum. We warmly welcome all the familiar faces from these many years – welcome and thank you for your continuing engagement in advancing the cause of legal education globally.
    [Show full text]
  • Weather Forecast
    WE TELL IT LIKE IT IS Phil. Copyright 2002 WEATHER FORECAST Vol. 18 No. 157 August 17, 2017 METRO MANILA 26°C to 33°C CEBU 25°C to 32°C The Nation DAVAO 25°C to 33°C s COA rejects DSWD’s Taguiwalo BIR forms special team for Bautista Currency Currency 1 Peso in COUNTRY couple tax violation probe in Peso in US$1 Currency Sunvar Realty to vacate Mile Long US (dollar) 51.2170 1.0000 0.0195 property Duterte wants joint exploration with Japan (yen) 0.4628 0.0090 2.1608 China UK (pound) 65.9214 1.2871 0.0152 Hong Kong (dollar) 6.5466 0.1278 0.1528 The Economy and Business China (yuan) 7.6603 0.1496 0.1305 Canada (dollar) 40.1576 0.7841 0.0249 BSP allays concerns as peso skids to Australia (dollar) 40.0415 0.7818 0.0250 fresh 11-year low ssss New Zealand (dollar) 37.0504 0.7234 0.0270 Stocks stay above 8,000 ahead of GDP results EMU ( eur o) 60.1134 1.1737 0.0166 No TRAIN, no Build Build Build -—- DOF PESO-DOLLAR RATE \ 30 trading days to August 16, 2017 Open: P 51.450 Corporate Briefs Close: P 51.350 AirAsia plans to return to Clark by 51.50 January 51.00 High: P 51.300 MPIC improves offer for MRT-3 rehab 50.50 SPAVI to accelerate PH store expansion 50.00 Low: P 51.600 49.50 49.00 W.A.: P 51.438 48.50 Vol.: $ 824.70 Mn PSE COMPOSITE INDEX Open: 8,015.69 30 trading days to August 16, 2017 s High: 8,082.49 8,400 8,200 Low: 7,996.01 8,000 7,800 Close: 8,046.59 7,600 7,400 Vol.: 1.540 Bn s Val.: P 12.738 Bn Disclaimer: The articles in this Daily News have been culled from various media sources.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Annual Meeting
    International Association of Law Schools 2015 Annual Meeting Developing Approaches and Standards for a Global Legal Education Hosted by: IE University, Law School 27th – 29th October 2015 Segovia, Spain INDEX Welcome…………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Agenda…………………………………………………………………………….… 4 Small Groups…………………………………………………………………….…. 9 Governing Board…………………………………………………………………… 13 Sponsors……………………………………………………………………............ 14 Committee Members …………………………………………………………..….. 15 Study Groups…………………………………………………………………..…… 17 Awardees……………………………………………………………………..…….. 18 Singapore Declaration on Global Standards & Outcomes of a Legal Education…… 19 Madrid Protocol on the Principles of Evaluation of Legal Education…………. 21 Report: Knowledge, Skills and Values……………………………..….………… 22 Members…………………………………………………………………..………… 25 Schools Attending……………………………………………………….…………. 28 Judiciary Attendees………………………………………………………………… 30 Governing Board Attendees……………………………………………………… 34 Attendees…………………………………………………………………………… 39 Support Staff……………………………………………………………………….. 77 Student Support…………………………………………………………………… 79 Available for Download Only Appendix – Award Papers Appendix – Suggested Reading Material Benfer, Emily A. and Shanahan, Colleen F. “Educating the invincibles: strategies for teaching the millennial generation in law school”, Clinical Law Review, Fall, 2013 Hosier, Maeve, “Literature Review: Methodologies for the Ranking of Law Schools and the Evaluation of Legal Scholarship”, 15 February 2015 Madison, Benjamin Madison III, “The Elephant in Law School
    [Show full text]
  • December 2019 PHILIPPINE COMPETITION BULLETIN
    Issue 16 | october - december 2019 PHILIPPINE COMPETITION BULLETIN What’s Inside 2 PCC IN 2019: STRONGER COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT FOR A GROWING ECONOMY 3 Supreme Court ADDS DAWN RAIDS TO PCC ARSENAL 6 adb funds PCC project on Capacity Building to Foster Competition 1 PCC IN 2019 STRONGER COMPETITION ENFORCEMENT FOR A GROWING ECONOMY In 2019, the Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) sustained its momentum in enforcing the competition law in pursuit of its mandate to prohibit anti-competitive agreements, abuse of market dominance, and anti- competitive mergers and acquisitions. First merger prohibition PCC blocked Universal Robina Corporation’s proposed acquisition of Central Azucarera Don Pedro as it would substantially lessen competition in the market for sugarcane milling services in Southern Luzon. The prohibition of the transaction prevented the creation of a monopoly that could significantly harm the welfare of sugarcane farmers in Batangas, Laguna, Cavite, and Quezon. jan Leniency Program In a bid to strengthen its enforcement mechanisms, PCC launched its leniency program, offering either immunity from suit or reduction of administrative fines to an entity that was or is a participant in price-fixing, bid-rigging, market-allocation, or output-restriction agreements, in exchange for the entity’s voluntary disclosure of information regarding such agreements. Expedited Merger Review Rules In line with government efforts to improve ease of doing business in the country, PCC launched an expedited review process for mergers and acquisitions (M&As) that are less likely to substantially prevent, restrict, or lessen competition in the relevant jun market. Under the expedited process, review of qualified M&A transactions will take only 15 working days, instead of the 30 calendar-day turnaround time for regular Phase 1 review prescribed by the Philippine Competition Act.
    [Show full text]