DOCSLIB.ORG

… Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/EBSA/WS/2014/2/2 12 March 2014 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
… Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/EBSA/WS/2014/2/2 12 March 2014 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH CBD Distr. GENERAL UNEP/CBD/EBSA/WS/2014/2/2 12 March 2014 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH NORTH-WEST ATLANTIC REGIONAL WORKSHOP TO FACILITATE THE DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT MARINE AREAS Montreal, 24-28 March 2014 DATA TO INFORM THE NORTH-WEST ATLANTIC REGIONAL WORKSHOP TO FACILITATE THE DESCRIPTION OF ECOLOGICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT MARINE AREAS Note by the Executive Secretary 1. The Executive Secretary is circulating herewith a background document containing data to inform the North-west Atlantic Regional Workshop to Facilitate the Description of Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas. This document was prepared by the Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Duke University, as commissioned by the Secretariat, in support of the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity in its scientific and technical preparation for the above-mentioned workshop. 2. The document is circulated in the form and language in which it was received by the Secretariat. /… In order to minimize the environmental impacts of the Secretariat’s processes, and to contribute to the Secretary- General’s initiative for a C-Neutral UN, this document is printed in limited numbers. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. Data to inform the CBD Workshop to Facilitate the Description of Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas in the Northwest Atlantic Patrick Halpin, Jesse Cleary, Corrie Curtice, Ben Donnelly, Daniel Dunn, Jason Roberts 24 March – 28 March 2014 Prepared for the Secretariat of the Convention on Biodiversity (SCBD) /… Inquiries should be addressed to: Jesse Cleary Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Duke University Durham, NC, USA Telephone : +1 919 613 8021 x6 Email : [email protected] Web : http://mgel.env.duke.edu Copyright and Disclaimer © Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708. To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of the Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab / Duke University. Important Notice Information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab (MGEL) advises the reader to note that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, MGEL (including its employees and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. Additionally, some data sets used herein require permission from the data providers for use. 3 Contents 1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 8 2 Biogeographic Classifications ........................................................................................... 9 2.1 Global Open Ocean and Deep Seabed (GOODS) biogeographic classification ..................... 9 2.2 Marine Ecoregions of the World (MEOW) ....................................................................................... 11 2.3 Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs) ....................................................................................................... 12 2.4 Longhurst Marine Provinces ................................................................................................................. 13 3 Biological Data ............................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Biological Data from the AMSA II(c) report .................................................................................... 14 3.2 Historical Whale Captures ...................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 Catches of Commercial Pelagic Species ............................................................................................. 18 3.4 Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS) ....................................................................... 20 3.5 Predictions of Deep Sea Corals ............................................................................................................. 24 3.6 Predictions of Deep-Sea Octocorals .................................................................................................... 28 3.7 Turtle tagging data aggregated by OBIS-SEAMAP ........................................................................ 29 3.8 Leatherback Turtle Telemetry and Density .................................................................................... 30 3.9 Spatial Use by Leatherback Turtles .................................................................................................... 32 3.10 Canadian Sea Turtle Network Tracks ............................................................................................. 34 3.11 Important Bird Areas ............................................................................................................................. 35 3.12 Distribution of Macrobenthic Organisms the Canadian Artic and Atlantic Waters ..... 36 3.13 Blue Shark Migration Pathways ........................................................................................................ 39 3.14 Vulnerable Marine Ecosystem Indicator Species ....................................................................... 41 3.15 Spring Bloom Spatial Dynamics......................................................................................................... 53 4 Physical Data ................................................................................................................. 54 4.1 Seamounts ..................................................................................................................................................... 55 4.2 Vents and Seeps .......................................................................................................................................... 57 4.3 Bathymetry (GEBCO) ................................................................................................................................ 58 4.4 Distribution of Large Submarine Canyons ....................................................................................... 59 4.5 Total Sediment Thickness of the Worlds Oceans & Marginal Seas ........................................ 60 4.6 Global Seascapes ......................................................................................................................................... 61 4.7 Seafloor Geomorphology......................................................................................................................... 63 4.8 CSIRO Atlas of Regional Seas (CARS) Physical Ocean Climatologies .................................... 64 4.9 Ocean Surface Temperature .................................................................................................................. 68 4.10 Sea Surface Temperature Front Occurrence ................................................................................ 69 4.11 VGPM Ocean Productivity .................................................................................................................... 70 4.12 Chlorophyll A Climatology ................................................................................................................... 71 4.13 Sea Surface Height ................................................................................................................................... 72 4.14 Mesoscale Eddy Density ....................................................................................................................... 73 4.15 Eddy Kinetic Energy ............................................................................................................................... 74 4.16 High Eddy Probability Areas from Geostrophic Currents ...................................................... 75 4.17 Gulf Stream Geostrophic Currents.................................................................................................... 76 4.18 Drifter Climatology of Near-Surface Currents ............................................................................. 77 4.19 Surface Current Velocity ....................................................................................................................... 78 4 5 Additional Data Reports ................................................................................................. 79 5.1 Identification Of Additional Ecologically And Biologically Significant Areas (EBSAs) Within The Newfoundland And Labrador Shelves Bioregion ............................................................. 79 5.2 Identification of Arctic marine areas of heightened ecological significance ..................... 81 5.3 Joint OSPAR/NEAFC/CBD Scientific Workshop on the Identification of Ecologically or Biologically Significant Areas (EBSAs) in the North-East Atlantic .................................................... 82 5.4 IUCN/NRDC Workshop to Identify EBSAs in the Arctic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United Nations Unep/Med Wg.474/3 United
    UNITED NATIONS UNEP/MED WG.474/3 UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN 24 Avril 2019 Original: English Meeting of the Ecosystem Approach of Correspondence Group on Monitoring (CORMON), Biodiversity and Fisheries. Rome, Italy, 12-13 May 2019 Agenda item 3: Guidance on monitoring marine benthic habitats (Common Indicators 1 and 2) Monitoring protocols of the Ecosystem Approach Common Indicators 1 and 2 related to marine benthic habitats For environmental and economy reasons, this document is printed in a limited number and will not be distributed at the meeting. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies. UNEP/MAP SPA/RAC - Tunis, 2019 Note by the Secretariat The 19th Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention (COP 19) agreed on the Integrated Monitoring and Assessment Programme (IMAP) of the Mediterranean Sea and Coast and Related Assessment Criteria which set, in its Decision IG.22/7, a specific list of 27 common indicators (CIs) and Good Environmental Status (GES) targets and principles of an integrated Mediterranean Monitoring and Assessment Programme. During the initial phase of the IMAP implementation (2016-2019), the Contracting parties to the Barcelona Convention updated the existing national monitoring and assessment programmes following the Decision requirements in order to provide all the data needed to assess whether ‘‘Good Environmental Status’’ defined through the Ecosystem Approach process has been achieved or maintained. In line with IMAP, Guidance Factsheets were developed, reviewed and agreed by the Meeting of the Ecosystem Approach Correspondence Group on Monitoring (CORMON) Biodiversity and Fisheries (Madrid, Spain, 28 February-1 March 2017) and the Meeting of the SPA/RAC Focal Points (Alexandria, Egypt, 9-12 May 2017) for the Common Indicators to ensure coherent monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Document for Deep-Sea Sponge Aggregations 2010
    Background Document for Deep-sea sponge aggregations Biodiversity Series 2010 OSPAR Convention Convention OSPAR The Convention for the Protection of the La Convention pour la protection du milieu Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite (the “OSPAR Convention”) was opened for Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la signature at the Ministerial Meeting of the signature à la réunion ministérielle des former Oslo and Paris Commissions in Paris anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, on 22 September 1992. The Convention à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention entered into force on 25 March 1998. It has est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. been ratified by Belgium, Denmark, Finland, La Convention a été ratifiée par l'Allemagne, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, la Belgique, le Danemark, la Finlande, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Portugal, and approved by the European Community le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne and Spain. et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède et la Suisse et approuvée par la Communauté européenne et l’Espagne. Acknowledgement This document has been prepared by Dr Sabine Christiansen for WWF as lead party. Rob van Soest provided contact with the surprisingly large sponge specialist group, of which Joana Xavier (Univ. Amsterdam) has engaged most in commenting on the draft text and providing literature. Rob van Soest, Ole Tendal, Marc Lavaleye, Dörte Janussen, Konstantin Tabachnik, Julian Gutt contributed with comments and updates of their research.
    [Show full text]
  • News from the School of Ocean Sciences And
    1 JULY 2018 THE BRIDGE News from the School of Ocean Sciences and the School of Ocean Sciences Alumni Association Contents 3 50 Years and Two Ships: The RV Prince Madog 4 Retirement – Prof Chris Richardson 6 Rajkumari Jones Bursary Recipient reports 8 VIMS Drapers’ Company VIMS Overseas Field Course 10 Meet some of our students and what they are up to this summer 11 Research Field Trips 18 School of Ocean Sciences Staff 19 Promotions 2018 THE BRIDGE July 20 Scholarships and Awards Please send your School of Ocean Sciences news to: [email protected] 21 Scholarships and Awards continued Please send your School of Ocean Sciences 22 Workshops, Meetings and Visits Alumni Association (SOSAA) news to: [email protected] 27 New SOS projects 28 Gender Equality – Athena Swan 28 SOS in the media 30 SOSA Welcome - Croeso 38 Recent Grant Awards (last 6 months) 39 Publications (2017 – Jun 2018) Welcome to the new version of our School of Ocean Sciences (SOS) newsletter incorporating the Alumni newsletter “The Bridge”. I am excited to share with you a vast array of our achievements over the past 6 months within the School, ranging from successful student and staff fieldtrips, newly obtained grants and research projects launched within SOS, and our progress towards equality. This new newsletter “The Bridge” has joined forces with our alumni to strengthen the newsletter and to promote news sharing between students and staff, both present and past. Gareth Williams, Editor 2018 OPEN DAYS Saturday July 7 Sunday October 14 Sunday October 28 Saturday November 10 3 The original RV Prince Madog arriving at Menai Bridge Pier for the first time on February 24th 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Maldonado Et Al
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 17 March 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.638505 A Microbial Nitrogen Engine Modulated by Bacteriosyncytia in Hexactinellid Sponges: Ecological Implications for Deep-Sea Communities Manuel Maldonado 1*, María López-Acosta 1, Kathrin Busch 2, Beate M. Slaby 2, Kristina Bayer 2, Lindsay Beazley 3, Ute Hentschel 2,4, Ellen Kenchington 3 and Hans Tore Rapp 5† 1 Department of Marine Ecology, Center for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Girona, Spain, 2 GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany, 3 Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Edited by: Dartmouth, NS, Canada, 4 Unit of Marine Symbioses, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany, 5 Department of Lorenzo Angeletti, Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Institute of Marine Science (CNR), Italy Reviewed by: Hexactinellid sponges are common in the deep sea, but their functional integration Robert W. Thacker, Stony Brook University, United States into those ecosystems remains poorly understood. The phylogenetically related Cole G. Easson, species Schaudinnia rosea and Vazella pourtalesii were herein incubated for nitrogen Middle Tennessee State University, and phosphorous, returning markedly different nutrient fluxes. Transmission electron United States Fengli Zhang, microscopy (TEM) revealed S. rosea to host a low abundance of extracellular microbes, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China while Vazella pourtalesii showed higher microbial abundance and hosted most microbes Giorgio Bavestrello, University of Genoa, Italy within bacteriosyncytia, a novel feature for Hexactinellida. Amplicon sequences of the *Correspondence: microbiome corroborated large between-species differences, also between the sponges Manuel Maldonado and the seawater of their habitats. Metagenome-assembled genome of the V.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Patterns of Arctic Sponge Ground Fauna and Demersal Fish Are Detectable in Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) Imagery
    Journal Pre-proof Spatial patterns of arctic sponge ground fauna and demersal fish are detectable in autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) imagery H.K. Meyer, E.M. Roberts, H.T. Rapp, A.J. Davies PII: S0967-0637(19)30283-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2019.103137 Reference: DSRI 103137 To appear in: Deep-Sea Research Part I Received Date: 13 March 2019 Revised Date: 26 September 2019 Accepted Date: 7 October 2019 Please cite this article as: Meyer, H.K., Roberts, E.M., Rapp, H.T., Davies, A.J., Spatial patterns of arctic sponge ground fauna and demersal fish are detectable in autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) imagery, Deep-Sea Research Part I, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2019.103137. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd. 1 Spatial patterns of arctic sponge ground fauna and demersal fish are detectable in 2 autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) imagery 3 4 H.K. Meyer a* , E.M. Roberts ab , H.T. Rapp ac , and A.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling the Distribution of Geodia Sponges and Sponge Grounds in the Northwest Atlantic
    Modeling the Distribution of Geodia Sponges and Sponge Grounds in the Northwest Atlantic Anders Knudby1*, Ellen Kenchington2, Francisco Javier Murillo2,3 1 Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, 2 Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada, 3 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Vigo, Programa de Pesquerías Lejanas, Vigo, Spain, Abstract Deep-sea sponge grounds provide structurally complex habitat for fish and invertebrates and enhance local biodiversity. They are also vulnerable to bottom-contact fisheries and prime candidates for Vulnerable Marine Ecosystem designation and related conservation action. This study uses species distribution modeling, based on presence and absence observations of Geodia spp. and sponge grounds derived from research trawl catches, as well as spatially continuous data on the physical and biological ocean environment derived from satellite data and oceanographic models, to model the distribution of Geodia sponges and sponge grounds in the Northwest Atlantic. Most models produce excellent fits with validation data although fits are reduced when models are extrapolated to new areas, especially when oceanographic regimes differ between areas. Depth and minimum bottom salinity were important predictors in most models, and a Geodia spp. minimum bottom salinity tolerance threshold in the 34.3-34.8 psu range was hypothesized on the basis of model structure. The models indicated two currently unsampled regions within the study area, the deeper parts of Baffin Bay and the Newfoundland and Labrador slopes, where future sponge grounds are most likely to be found. Citation: Knudby A, Kenchington E, Murillo FJ (2013) Modeling the Distribution of Geodia Sponges and Sponge Grounds in the Northwest Atlantic.
    [Show full text]
  • From Boreo-Arctic North-Atlantic Deep-Sea Sponge Grounds
    fmars-07-595267 December 18, 2020 Time: 11:45 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 18 December 2020 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.595267 Reproductive Biology of Geodia Species (Porifera, Tetractinellida) From Boreo-Arctic North-Atlantic Deep-Sea Sponge Grounds Vasiliki Koutsouveli1,2*, Paco Cárdenas2, Maria Conejero3, Hans Tore Rapp4 and Ana Riesgo1,5* 1 Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom, 2 Pharmacognosy, Department Edited by: Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 3 Analytical Methods-Bioimaging Facility, Royal Botanic Chiara Romano, Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom, 4 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Centre for Advanced Studies 5 Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Consejo Superior of Blanes (CEAB), Spanish National de Investigaciones Científicas, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales Calle de José Gutiérrez Abascal, Madrid, Spain Research Council, Spain Reviewed by: Sylvie Marylène Gaudron, Boreo-arctic sponge grounds are essential deep-sea structural habitats that provide Sorbonne Universités, France important services for the ecosystem. These large sponge aggregations are dominated Rhian G. Waller, University of Gothenburg, Sweden by demosponges of the genus Geodia (order Tetractinellida, family Geodiidae). However, *Correspondence: little is known about the basic biological features of these species, such as their life Vasiliki Koutsouveli cycle and dispersal capabilities. Here, we surveyed five deep-sea species of Geodia [email protected]; from the North-Atlantic Ocean and studied their reproductive cycle and strategy using [email protected] Ana Riesgo light and electron microscopy. The five species were oviparous and gonochoristic. [email protected]; Synchronous development was observed at individual and population level in most [email protected] of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Serial No. N5629
    Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization Serial No. N5629 NAFO SCS Doc. 09/7 SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL MEETING – JUNE 2009 2009 Meeting of the Joint ICES-NAFO Working Group on Deepwater Ecology [WGDEC] By E. Kenchington Fisheries and Oceans, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada The WGDEC met from March 9-13, 2009 in Copenhagen, Denmark to address 11 terms of reference (see Appendix 1), many of relevance to NAFO. Thirteen scientists from 9 countries participated. The meeting was held jointly with the Working Group on the Biology and Assessment of Deep Sea Fisheries Resources (WGDEEP), with 5 terms of reference (ToRs) shared between the groups. The full WGDEC report will be available online at http://www.ices.dk/workinggroups/ViewWorkingGroup.aspx?ID=15, possibly by the end of May. As for the 2008 meeting, the number of terms of reference was greater than the number of participants and this limited the depth to which some ToRs could be addressed in such a short time frame. Nevertheless, the WGDEC made significant contributions to a number of important NAFO issues. Their ToR f) produced a list of 25 sponge species which are habitat-forming and can be considered indicators of sponge VMEs in the North Atlantic (Appendix 2). This list was prepared with the assistance of Dr. Ole Tendal, an internationally recognized authority on sponges, and a member of WGDEC. The WGDEC further examined the types of damage that fishing operations can inflict on sponges and assessed their impact. These impacts were classified as due to mechanical damage, dislodgement and sedimentation. From this report it is clear that sponges brought on deck and returned to the sea will not survive, nor will sponges dislodged from the seabed.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Biodiversity Trends 2010 – Selected Indicators of Change
    Arctic Biodiversity Trends 2010 Selected indicators of change ARCTIC COUNCIL This publication should be cited as: Arctic Biodiversity Trends 2010 – Selected indicators of change. CAFF International Secretariat, Akureyri, Iceland. May 2010. The report and associated materials can be downloaded for free at www.arcticbiodiversity.is ISBN: 978-9979-9778-3-4 Printed by Ásprent Stell For more information please contact: CAFF International Secretariat Borgir, Nordurslod, 600 Akureyri, Iceland Phone: +354 462-3350 Fax: +354 462-3390 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.caff.is Arctic Biodiversity Trends 2010 Selected indicators of change ARCTIC COUNCIL Arctic Athabaskan Council Acknowledgements CAFF Designated Agencies • Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada • Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands Steering committee members (Kingdom of Denmark) • Tom Barry, CAFF Secretariat, Akureyri, Iceland • Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland • Cindy Dickson, Arctic Athabaskan Council, Whitehorse, Yukon, • The Ministry of Domestic Affairs, Nature and Environment, Canada Government of Greenland, Greenland • Janet Hohn, United States Department of the Interior, Fish and • Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA • Directorate for Nature Management, Trondheim, Norway • Esko Jaakkola, Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, • Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources, Moscow, Russia Finland • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden • Tiina
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of Deep-Water Bamboo Coral Forest in the South China Sea Jianru Li* & Pinxian Wang
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Discovery of Deep-Water Bamboo Coral Forest in the South China Sea Jianru Li* & Pinxian Wang A deep-water coral forest, characterized by slender and whip-shaped bamboo corals has been discovered from water depths of 1200–1380 m at the western edge of the Xisha (Paracel Islands) area in the South China Sea. The bamboo corals are often accompanied by cold-water gorgonian “sea fan” corals: Anthogorgia sp. and Calyptrophora sp., as well as assemblages of sponges, cirrate octopuses, crinoids and other animals. The coral density increased toward the shallower areas from 24.8 to 220 colonies per 100 m2 from 1380 m to 1200 m water depth. This is the frst set of observations of deep- water bamboo coral forests in Southeast Asia, opening a new frontier for systematic, ecological and conservation studies to understand the deep-coral ecosystem in the region. Even if known to science for over a century, deep-sea cold-water corals have become a research focus only in the 1990s, when advanced acoustics and submersibles started to reveal the complexity of coral ecosystems in the deep ocean. Te frst discovery was cold-water, scleractinian coral reefs in the Atlantic Ocean1,2, followed by gorgon- ian coral forests in various parts of the global ocean3. Intriguing is the rarity of such reports from the Northwest Pacifc. Along with some Russian data from Kamchatka4, the only case in the international literature is the report of gorgonian corals in the Shiribeshi Seamount west of Hokkaido, Japan5. Here we report, for the frst time, on a deep-water cold coral forest in the South China Sea (SCS), which was observed between 1200 and 1380 meters depth during an expedition in May 2018, with the manned submersible “ShenhaiYongshi” to the Xisha Islands (Paracel Islands) area (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • A Perspective for Best Governance of the Bari Canyon Deep-Sea Ecosystems
    water Article A Perspective for Best Governance of the Bari Canyon Deep-Sea Ecosystems Lorenzo Angeletti 1,* , Gianfranco D’Onghia 2,3, Maria del Mar Otero 4, Antonio Settanni 5, Maria Teresa Spedicato 6 and Marco Taviani 1,7 1 ISMAR-CNR, Via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] 2 Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Via E. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy; [email protected] 3 CoNISMa, Piazzale Flaminio 9, 00196 Roma, Italy 4 IUCN—Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, C/Marie Curie No. 22 (PTA), 29590 Málaga, Spain; [email protected] 5 Strada Statale 16 Sud Complanare Ovest 92, 70126 Bari, Italy; [email protected] 6 COISPA Tecnologia & Ricerca, Stazione Sperimentale per lo Studio delle Risorse del Mare, Via dei Trulli 18/20, 70126 Bari, Italy; [email protected] 7 Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Villa Comunale, 80121 Napoli, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-051-639-8936 Abstract: There is growing awareness of the impact of fishery activities on fragile and vulnerable deep-sea ecosystems, stimulating actions devoted to their protection and best management by national and international organizations. The Bari Canyon in the Adriatic Sea represents a good case study of this, since it hosts vulnerable ecosystems, threatened species, as well as valuable commercial species, but virtually lacks substantial management plans for the sustainable use of resources. This study documents the high level of biodiversity of the Bari Canyon and the impact of Citation: Angeletti, L.; D’Onghia, G.; human activities by analyzing remotely operated vehicle surveys and benthic lander deployments.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Sponges (Phylum: Porifera) Off Tuticorin, India
    Available online at: www.mbai.org.in doi:10.6024/jmbai.2020.62.2.2250-05 Biodiversity of sponges (Phylum: Porifera) off Tuticorin, India M. S. Varsha1,4 , L. Ranjith2, Molly Varghese1, K. K. Joshi1*, M. Sethulakshmi1, A. Reshma Prasad1, Thobias P. Antony1, M.S. Parvathy1, N. Jesuraj2, P. Muthukrishnan2, I. Ravindren2, A. Paulpondi2, K. P. Kanthan2, M. Karuppuswami2, Madhumita Biswas3 and A. Gopalakrishnan1 1ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi-682018, Kerala, India. 2Regional Station of ICAR-CMFRI, Tuticorin-628 001, Tamil Nadu, India. 3Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change, New Delhi-110003, India. 4Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi-682022, India. *Correspondence e-mail: [email protected] Received: 10 Nov 2020 Accepted: 18 Dec 2020 Published: 30 Dec 2020 Original Article Abstract the Vaippar - Tuticorin area. Tuticorin area is characterized by the presence of hard rocky bottom, soft muddy bottom, lagoon The present study deals with 18 new records of sponges found at and lakes. Thiruchendur to Tuticorin region of GOM-up to a Kayalpatnam area and a checklist of sponges reported off Tuticorin distance of 25 nautical miles from shore 8-10 m depth zone-is in the Gulf of Mannar. The new records are Aiolochoria crassa, characterized by a narrow belt of submerged dead coral blocks Axinella damicornis, Clathria (Clathria) prolifera, Clathrina sororcula, which serves as a very good substrate for sponges. Patches of Clathrina sinusarabica, Clathrina coriacea, Cliona delitrix, Colospongia coral ground “Paar” in the 10-23 m depth zone, available in auris, Crella incrustans, Crambe crambe, Hyattella pertusa, Plakortis an area of 10-16 nautical miles from land are pearl oyster beds simplex, Petrosia (Petrosia) ficiformis, Phorbas plumosus, (Mahadevan and Nayar, 1967; Nayar and Mahadevan, 1987) Spheciospongia vesparium, Spirastrella cunctatrix, Xestospongia which also forms a good habitat for sponges.
    [Show full text]