CASE M.8792 - T-Mobile NL/Tele2 NL

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CASE M.8792 - T-Mobile NL/Tele2 NL EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition CASE M.8792 - T-Mobile NL/Tele2 NL (Only the English text is authentic) MERGER PROCEDURE REGULATION (EC) 139/2004 Article 8 (1) Regulation (EC) 139/2004 Date: 27/11/2018 This is a provisional non-confidential version. The definitive non- confidential version will be published as soon as it is available. This text is made available for information purposes only. A summary of this decision will be published in all EU languages in the Official Journal of the European Union. Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets. EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 27.11.2018 C(2018) 7768 final PUBLIC VERSION COMMISSION DECISION of 27.11.2018 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case M.8792 - T-Mobile NL/Tele2 NL) (Only the English version is authentic) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 11 2. The Parties and the Transaction ................................................................................. 12 3. Union dimension ........................................................................................................ 12 4. The procedure ............................................................................................................. 13 5. The investigation ........................................................................................................ 14 6. The Dutch mobile telecommunications sector ........................................................... 15 6.1. Key metrics ................................................................................................................ 15 6.1.1. Data sources ............................................................................................................... 15 6.1.2. Technological development ....................................................................................... 16 6.1.3. Retail mobile telecommunications services in the Netherlands ................................. 17 6.1.4. Retail customer groups ............................................................................................... 24 6.2. Customer switching .................................................................................................... 25 6.3. Mobile telecommunications service providers in the Netherlands ............................ 25 6.3.1. MNOs ......................................................................................................................... 25 6.3.1.1. KPN ............................................................................................................................ 26 6.3.1.2. VodafoneZiggo .......................................................................................................... 26 6.3.1.3. TMNL ........................................................................................................................ 27 6.3.1.4. Tele2 NL .................................................................................................................... 28 6.3.1.5. Spectrum holdings by the MNOs ............................................................................... 28 6.3.1.6. Mobile telecommunications infrastructure ................................................................ 29 A. Site construction ......................................................................................................... 29 B. Network sharing ......................................................................................................... 32 6.3.1.7. Agreements between the MNOs ................................................................................ 33 6.3.2. Other telecommunications services providers ........................................................... 34 6.3.2.1. Simpel ........................................................................................................................ 34 6.3.2.2. Youfone ...................................................................................................................... 35 6.3.2.3. Other MVNOs ............................................................................................................ 35 6.3.2.4. Regulatory regime regarding MVNOs ....................................................................... 36 6.4. Convergence and multi-play offers ............................................................................ 36 6.5. Distribution system .................................................................................................... 39 6.6. Competitive conditions .............................................................................................. 40 6.6.1. Competitive parameters ............................................................................................. 41 6.6.2. Overview of price related competition ....................................................................... 42 2 7. Relevant markets ........................................................................................................ 43 7.1. Retail mobile telecommunication services ................................................................. 43 7.1.1. Product market definition ........................................................................................... 44 7.1.1.1. Retail mobile and fixed telecommunication services ................................................. 44 A. Commission precedent ............................................................................................... 44 B. The Notifying Party's views ....................................................................................... 44 C. The Commission's assessment ................................................................................... 44 7.1.1.2. Mobile services and WiFi .......................................................................................... 44 A. Commission precedent ............................................................................................... 44 B. The Notifying Party's views ....................................................................................... 45 C. The Commission's assessment ................................................................................... 45 7.1.1.3. Mobile telecommunications services and OTT services ............................................ 45 A. Commission precedent ............................................................................................... 45 B. The Notifying Party's views ....................................................................................... 46 C. The Commission's assessment ................................................................................... 46 7.1.1.4. Private and business customers .................................................................................. 46 A. Commission precedent ............................................................................................... 46 B. The Notifying Party's views ....................................................................................... 47 C. The Commission's assessment ................................................................................... 47 (i) Demand side ............................................................................................................... 47 (ii) Supply side ................................................................................................................. 50 (iii) Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 51 7.1.1.5. Prepaid and postpaid .................................................................................................. 51 A. Commission precedent ............................................................................................... 51 B. The Notifying Party's views ....................................................................................... 51 C. The Commission's assessment ................................................................................... 51 7.1.1.6. SIM-only subscriptions/handset subscriptions ........................................................... 52 A. Commission precedent ............................................................................................... 52 B. The Notifying Party's views ....................................................................................... 52 C. The Commission's assessment ................................................................................... 52 7.1.1.7. Technology: 2G, 3G, 4G ............................................................................................ 52 A. Commission precedent ............................................................................................... 52 B. The Notifying Party's views ....................................................................................... 52 C. The Commission's assessment ................................................................................... 52 7.1.1.8. Voice, SMS/MMS and data services ......................................................................... 53 A. Commission precedent ............................................................................................... 53 3 B. The Notifying Party's views ......................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Austrian Market for Mobile Telecommunication Services to Private Customers
    The Austrian Market for Mobile Telecommunication Services to Private Customers An Ex-post Evaluation of the Mergers H3G/Orange and TA/Yesss! Sectoral Inquiry BWB/AW-393 Final Report Vienna, March 2016 cite as BWB (2016). The Austrian Market for Mobile Telecommunication Services to Pri- vate Customers. An Ex-post Evaluation of the Mergers H3G/Orange and TA/Yesss!, Sectoral Inquiry BWB/AW-393, Final Report, Vienna. BWB (2016). Der österreichische Privatkundenmarkt für Mobiltelefonie. Eine Ex- post Evaluierung der Zusammenschlüsse H3G/Orange und TA/Yesss!, Branchen- untersuchung BWB/AW-393, Endbericht (en), Wien. Authors Dominik Erharter Johannes Gruber Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde (BWB) Federal Competition Authority Praterstraße 31 (Galaxy Tower) 1020 Vienna, Austria T: +43 (0)1 245 08 - 0 F: +43 (0)1 587 42 00 E: [email protected] W: http://www.bwb.gv.at - 2 - Zusammenfassung Die Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde (BWB) kann allgemeine Untersuchungen eines Wirtschaftszweiges durchführen, sofern die Umstände vermuten lassen, dass der Wettbewerb in dem betreffenden Wirtschaftszweig eingeschränkt oder verfälscht ist. Im Rahmen einer solchen Branchenuntersuchung hat die BWB die Entwicklung des österreichischen Mobilfunkmarktes untersucht. Im Dezember 2012 wurde die Übernahme von Orange Austria (Orange) durch Hutchinson 3G Austria (H3G) von der Europäischen Kommission unter Auflagen freigegeben. In einer wirtschaftlich verbundenen Transaktion verkaufte H3G die zu Orange gehörende Marke "Yesss!" an den marktführenden Mobilfunkanbieter Telekom Austria (TA). Dieser Zusam- menschluss wurde im November 2012 vom österreichischen Kartellgericht ohne Auflagen freigegeben. Die BWB hatte sich in beiden Verfahren, vor dem Kartellge- richt und vor der Europäischen Kommission, gegen eine Freigabe ausgesprochen. Vor den Zusammenschlüssen gab es vier Mobilfunknetzbetreiber am österreichi- schen Markt.
    [Show full text]
  • Merger Control Review
    Merger Control Review Ninth Edition Editor Ilene Knable Gotts lawreviews © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd Merger Control Review Ninth Edition Editor Ilene Knable Gotts lawreviews © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd PUBLISHER Tom Barnes SENIOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Nick Barette BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS Thomas Lee, Joel Woods SENIOR ACCOUNT MANAGER Pere Aspinall ACCOUNT MANAGERS Sophie Emberson, Jack Bagnall PRODUCT MARKETING EXECUTIVE Rebecca Mogridge EDITORIAL COORDINATOR Gavin Jordan HEAD OF PRODUCTION Adam Myers PRODUCTION EDITOR Anna Andreoli SUBEDITOR Janina Godowska CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Paul Howarth Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London 87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd www.TheLawReviews.co.uk No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply. The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation, nor does it necessarily represent the views of authors’ firms or their clients. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided. The publishers accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein. Although the information provided is accurate as of July 2018, be advised that this is a developing area. Enquiries concerning reproduction should be sent to Law Business Research, at the address above. Enquiries concerning editorial content should be directed to the Publisher – [email protected] ISBN 978-1-912228-46-1 Printed in Great Britain by
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of the Hutchison/Orange Merger in Austria
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Pedrós, Xavier; Bahia, Kalvin; Castells, Pau; Abate, Serafino Conference Paper Assessing the impact of mobile consolidation on innovation and quality: An evaluation of the Hutchison/Orange merger in Austria 28th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "Competition and Regulation in the Information Age", Passau, Germany, 30th July - 2nd August, 2017 Provided in Cooperation with: International Telecommunications Society (ITS) Suggested Citation: Pedrós, Xavier; Bahia, Kalvin; Castells, Pau; Abate, Serafino (2017) : Assessing the impact of mobile consolidation on innovation and quality: An evaluation of the Hutchison/Orange merger in Austria, 28th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "Competition and Regulation in the Information Age", Passau, Germany, 30th July - 2nd August, 2017, International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Calgary This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/169453 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen,
    [Show full text]
  • Press Releases, SEC Filings, Recent News, Financial Results, and Other Announcements
    Press Contact: Shannon N. Booker Ciena Corporation +1 (410) 865-8570 [email protected] Investor Contact: Gregg Lampf Ciena Corporation +1 (410) 694-5700 [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tele2 Netherlands Improves Network Performance Using Ciena’s WaveLogic Ai Spike in mobile data usage drives the need for an adaptive network that scales up to 400G HANOVER, Md. – September 10, 2018 – Tele2 Netherlands, a leading regional telecommunications service provider, recently deployed Ciena’s (NYSE: CIEN) WaveLogic Ai coherent optical solution to increase the capacity of its network, lower operating costs and support a tremendous increase in mobile video data traffic driven by Netflix™ and YouTube™. Key Facts: • Tele2 Netherlands is a telecommunications service provider supporting the Dutch market. Tele2 Netherlands services both domestic and large enterprise customers, and manages a portfolio of fixed telephone, mobile phone, broadband and digital television products. • Using Ciena’s 6500 packet-optical platform powered by WaveLogic Ai, the industry’s first programmable coherent modem that can scale to 400Gbps per wavelength, Tele2 Netherlands can deploy 300G and 400G wavelengths across most of its existing network. The platform enables Tele2 Netherlands to effectively address a significant surge of mobile data usage from customers who are taking advantage of the service provider’s unlimited bundles for voice and mobile internet services. • WaveLogic Ai enables Tele2 Netherlands to leverage existing network assets and deliver up to forty times the bandwidth the network was originally designed to support. The service provider also benefits from a smaller footprint, reduced cost per bit and power consumption and lower cooling requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Jon James to Leave Tele2 Following the Merger in the Netherlands
    Jon James to leave Tele2 following the merger in the Netherlands Stockholm – Tele2 AB (Tele2) (Nasdaq Stockholm: TEL2 A and TEL2 B) today announces that Jon James, Executive Vice President and former CEO Tele2 Netherlands leaves the Leadership Team and Tele2 at the end of June. Following the merger of Tele2 and T-Mobile in the Netherlands, announced on January 2nd2019, Jon James, Executive Vice President and former CEO Tele2 Netherlands, will officially leave Tele2 at the end of June 2019. – Jon joined Tele2 in 2017 and has been a crucial driver behind the turnaround of Tele2’s Dutch operations, ultimately culminating with the merger. Jon and I have worked together for many years and he has contributed greatly to both the success of Com Hem and Tele2 in his two most recent positions. I want to thank Jon for his leadership and engagement, and I wish him the best of luck in whatever challenges he will take on in the future, says Anders Nilsson, President and CEO, Tele2. – It is a source of great satisfaction to have secured, in just two years, a significant organizational transformation of Tele2 Netherlands plus the successful T-Mobile merger with an unconditional European clearance. This reflects great credit on the Tele2 team, in particular my Dutch colleagues, and I wish them all the best for the future, says Jon James, Executive Vice President and former CEO Tele2 Netherlands. For more information, please contact: Joel Ibson, Head of Corporate Communications, Tele2 AB, Phone: +46 766 26 44 00 Erik Strandin Pers, Head of Investor Relations, Tele2 AB, Phone: +46 733 41 41 88 TELE2’S MISSION IS TO FEARLESSLY LIBERATE PEOPLE TO LIVE A MORE CONNECTED LIFE.
    [Show full text]
  • ZONE COUNTRIES OPERATOR TADIG CODE Calls
    Calls made abroad SMS sent abroad Calls To Belgium SMS TADIG To zones SMS to SMS to SMS to ZONE COUNTRIES OPERATOR received Local and Europe received CODE 2,3 and 4 Belgium EUR ROW abroad (= zone1) abroad 3 AFGHANISTAN AFGHAN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION COMPANY 'AWCC' AFGAW 0,91 0,99 2,27 2,89 0,00 0,41 0,62 0,62 3 AFGHANISTAN AREEBA MTN AFGAR 0,91 0,99 2,27 2,89 0,00 0,41 0,62 0,62 3 AFGHANISTAN TDCA AFGTD 0,91 0,99 2,27 2,89 0,00 0,41 0,62 0,62 3 AFGHANISTAN ETISALAT AFGHANISTAN AFGEA 0,91 0,99 2,27 2,89 0,00 0,41 0,62 0,62 1 ALANDS ISLANDS (FINLAND) ALANDS MOBILTELEFON AB FINAM 0,08 0,29 0,29 2,07 0,00 0,09 0,09 0,54 2 ALBANIA AMC (ALBANIAN MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS) ALBAM 0,74 0,91 1,65 2,27 0,00 0,41 0,62 0,62 2 ALBANIA VODAFONE ALBVF 0,74 0,91 1,65 2,27 0,00 0,41 0,62 0,62 2 ALBANIA EAGLE MOBILE SH.A ALBEM 0,74 0,91 1,65 2,27 0,00 0,41 0,62 0,62 2 ALGERIA DJEZZY (ORASCOM) DZAOT 0,74 0,91 1,65 2,27 0,00 0,41 0,62 0,62 2 ALGERIA ATM (MOBILIS) (EX-PTT Algeria) DZAA1 0,74 0,91 1,65 2,27 0,00 0,41 0,62 0,62 2 ALGERIA WATANIYA TELECOM ALGERIE S.P.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Tariff-Mediated Network Effects Versus Strategic Discounting: Evidence from German Mobile Telecommunications
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Zucchini, Leon; Claussen, Jörg; Trüg, Moritz Working Paper Tariff-Mediated Network Effects versus Strategic Discounting: Evidence from German Mobile Telecommunications Discussion Paper, No. 2012-01 Provided in Cooperation with: University of Munich, Munich School of Management Suggested Citation: Zucchini, Leon; Claussen, Jörg; Trüg, Moritz (2013) : Tariff- Mediated Network Effects versus Strategic Discounting: Evidence from German Mobile Telecommunications, Discussion Paper, No. 2012-01, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Fakultät für Betriebswirtschaft, München, http://dx.doi.org/10.5282/ubm/epub.14848 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/104532 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung
    [Show full text]
  • ITU Operational Bulletin Telecommunication Union
    International ITU Operational Bulletin Telecommunication Union No. 850 15.XII.2005 (Information received by 8 December 2005) Table of Contents Page General information Lists annexed to the ITU Operational Bulletin: Note from TSB.............................................................. 2 Approval of ITU-T Recommendations................................................................................................... 3 Assignment of Signalling Area/Network Codes (SANC) (ITU-T Recommendation Q.708 (03/1999)): Note from TSB).................................................................................................................................. 4 International Public Telecommunication Numbering Plan (ITU-T Recommendation E.164 (02/2005)): Identification Codes for International Networks ................................................................................ 5 Telephone Service: Afghanistan (Ministry of Communications (MoC), Kabul)............................................................. 5 Denmark (National IT and Telecom Agency (NITA), Copenhagen) ............................................... 6 Egypt (National Telecom Regulatory Authority (NTRA), Cairo) ..................................................... 6 New Zealand (Ministry of Economic Development, Wellington) ................................................... 8 Niger (Société Nigérienne des Télécommunications (SONITEL), Niamey)...................................... 9 Service Restrictions: Note from TSB ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Governance Report 2017 Corporate Governance Report 2017
    Corporate Governance Report 2017 Corporate Governance Report 2017 Tele2 in brief Tele2 AB (publ) (“Tele2” or the “company”) has 15 million custom- mandatory law and rules, applies Nasdaq Stockholm’s Rule Book for ers in seven countries and offers mobile services, fixed broadband Issuers Nasdaq Stockholm and the Swedish Corporate Governance and telephony, data network services, content services and global Code (“the Code”). IoT solutions. In 2017, the company had net sales of SEK 25 (21) bil- This Corporate Governance Report is published separately lion and reported EBITDA of SEK 6.4 (5.4) billion. Tele2's divestment from the Annual Report and prepared in accordance with the of its Austrian operations to Hutchison Drei Austria GmbH (Three Swedish Annual Accounts Act and the provisions of the Code. Austria) was closed on October 31, 2017. On December 15, 2017, Previous years’ Corporate Governance Reports and other corporate Tele2 and Deutsche Telekom agreed to combine Tele2 Netherlands governance documents are available on the corporate website, and T-Mobile Netherlands where Tele2 will hold a 25% share www.tele2.com. The Code is based on the principle of comply or in the combined company. Tele2 Austria and Tele2 Netherlands explain, which means that companies can deviate from single rules have been reported as discontinued operations and therefore not in the Code, provided that they offer an explanation for the devia- included above. Tele2 is a Swedish limited liability company with tion. Tele2 has not deviated from the Code during 2017. shares listed on the Nasdaq Stockholm and thus, in addition to Overview of corporate governance at Tele2 Sound corporate governance at Tele2 means the establishment supports the understanding and monitoring of the development of of an appropriate framework for decision making, assignment of the company.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Pay TV Operator Forecasts
    Global Pay TV Operator Forecasts Table of Contents Published in October 2016, this 190-page electronically-delivered report comes in two parts: A 190-page PDF giving a global executive summary and forecasts. An excel workbook giving comparison tables and country-by-country forecasts in detail for 400 operators with 585 platforms [125 digital cable, 112 analog cable, 208 satellite, 109 IPTV and 31 DTT] across 100 territories for every year from 2010 to 2021. Forecasts (2010-2021) contain the following detail for each country: By country: TV households Digital cable subs Analog cable subs Pay IPTV subscribers Pay digital satellite TV subs Pay DTT homes Total pay TV subscribers Pay TV revenues By operator (and by platform by operator): Pay TV subscribers Share of pay TV subscribers by operator Subscription & VOD revenues Share of pay TV revenues by operator ARPU Countries and operators covered: Country No of ops Operators Algeria 4 beIN, OSN, ART, Algerie Telecom Angola 5 ZAP TV, DStv, Canal Plus, Angola Telecom, TV Cabo Argentina 3 Cablevision; Supercanal; DirecTV Australia 1 Foxtel Austria 3 Telekom Austria; UPC; Sky Bahrain 4 beIN, OSN, ART, Batelco Belarus 2 MTIS, Zala Belgium 5 Belgacom; Numericable; Telenet; VOO; Telesat/TV Vlaanderen Bolivia 3 DirecTV, Tigo, Entel Bosnia 3 Telemach, M:Tel; Total TV Brazil 5 Claro; GVT; Vivo; Sky; Oi Bulgaria 5 Blizoo, Bulsatcom, Vivacom, M:Tel, Mobitel Canada 9 Rogers Cable; Videotron; Cogeco; Shaw Communications; Shaw Direct; Bell TV; Telus TV; MTS; Max TV Chile 6 VTR; Telefonica; Claro; DirecTV;
    [Show full text]
  • Analysys Mason Report on Developments in Cable for Superfast Broadband
    Final report for Ofcom Future capability of cable networks for superfast broadband 23 April 2014 Rod Parker, Alex Slinger, Malcolm Taylor, Matt Yardley Ref: 39065-174-B . Future capability of cable networks for superfast broadband | i Contents 1 Executive summary 1 2 Introduction 5 3 Cable network origins and development 6 3.1 History of cable networks and their move into broadband provision 6 3.2 The development of DOCSIS and EuroDOCSIS 8 4 Cable network elements and architecture 10 4.1 Introduction 10 4.2 Transmission elements 10 4.3 Description of key cable network elements 13 4.4 Cable access network architecture 19 5 HFC network implementation, including DOCSIS 3.0 specification 21 5.1 Introduction 21 5.2 HFC performance considerations 21 5.3 Delivery of broadband services using DOCSIS 3.0 24 5.4 Limitations of DOCSIS 3.0 specification 27 5.5 Implications for current broadband performance under DOCSIS 3.0 30 6 DOCSIS 3.1 specification 33 6.1 Introduction 33 6.2 Reference architecture 34 6.3 PHY layer frequency plan 35 6.4 PHY layer data encoding options 37 6.5 MAC and upper layer protocol interface (MULPI) features of DOCSIS 3.1 39 6.6 Development roadmap 40 6.7 Backwards compatibility 42 6.8 Implications for broadband service bandwidth of introducing DOCSIS 3.1 43 6.9 Flexibility of DOCSIS 3.1 to meet evolving service demands from customers 47 6.10 Beyond DOCSIS 3.1 47 7 Addressing future broadband growth with HFC systems – expanding DOCSIS 3.0 and migration to DOCSIS 3.1 49 7.1 Considerations of future broadband growth 49 7.2 Key levers for increasing HFC data capacity 52 7.3 DOCSIS 3.0 upgrades 53 7.4 DOCSIS 3.1 upgrades 64 7.5 Summary 69 Ref: 39065-174-B .
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Notification Form
    COMISIÓN DEL MERCADO DE LAS TELECOMUNICACIONES NOTIFICATION OF DRAFT MEASURES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 7(3) OF DIRECTIVE 2002/21/EC FOR VOICE CALL TERMINATION ON INDIVIDUAL MOBILE NETWORKS. Under the obligation in article 16 of the Directive 2002/21/EC, CMT has conducted an analysis of the markets for voice call termination on individual mobile networks. On 2nd February 2012, the CMT has reached its preliminary conclusions on market definition, the extent of competition in those markets, the designation of undertakings having significant market power and the regulatory obligations needed to be imposed. CMT hereby notifies the Commission of its proposed remedies and obligations consistent with article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC. These remedies and obligations are set out in the attached summary notification form. Under Article 6 of the Directive 2002/21/EC and according to national procedures, CMT conducted a national consultation which started on 5fh December 2011 and ended on 5fh December 2012. CMT has also requested the opinion of the National Competition Authority –Comisión Nacional de la Competencia -, concerning the definition and the SMP assessment on this market. This draft measure has taken into account the comments received during the public consultation and the opinion of the National Competition Authority. 1 COMISIÓN DEL MERCADO DE LAS TELECOMUNICACIONES Standard Form relating to Notifications of Draft Measures Pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC Section 1 Market definition Please state where applicable: 1.1 The relevant product/service market. Is this market mentioned in the Recommendation on relevant markets? Voice call termination on individual mobile networks, including both MNOs and full MVNOs.
    [Show full text]