Independent Adviser's Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
JMAD Media Ownership Report
JMAD New Zealand Media Ownership Report 2014 Published: 2014 December 5 Author: Merja Myllylahti This New Zealand Ownership Report 2014 is the fourth published by AUT’s Centre for Journalism, Media and Democracy (JMAD). The report finds that the New Zealand media market has failed to produce new, innovative media outlets, and that all the efforts to establish non-profit outlets have proved unsustainable. The report confirms the general findings of previous reports that New Zealand media space has remained highly commercial. It also confirms the financialisation of media ownership in the form of banks and fund managers. The report also observes that in 2014 convergence between New Zealand mass media and the communications sector generally was in full swing. Companies, such as Spark (former Telecom NZ), started to compete head-to-head with the traditional broadcasters on the online on-demand video and television markets. The American online video subscription service Netflix is entering the NZ market in March 2015. Additionally, the report notes evidence of uncomfortable alliances between citizen media, politicians, PR companies and legacy media. As Nicky Hager’s Dirty Politics book revealed, the National Party and PR practitioners used the Whale Oil blog to drive their own agendas. Also, events related to Maori TV, TVNZ and Scoop raise questions about political interference in media affairs. It is now evident that the boundaries between mainstream media, bloggers, public relations practitioners and politicians are blurring. Key events and trends concerning New Zealand media Financialisation of mass media ownership confirmed Substantial changes in Fairfax, APN and MediaWorks ownership Competition heats up in online television and video markets Turbulence at Maori TV Blurred lines among politicians, bloggers, journalists and PR practitioners The JMAD New Zealand media ownership reports are available here: http://www.aut.ac.nz/study- at-aut/study-areas/communications/media-networks/journalism,-media-and-democracy-research- centre/journalists-and-projects 1 1. -
CRL Mediaworks
IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Notices of Requirement by AUCKLAND TRANSPORT pursuant to section 168 of the Act to the Auckland Council relating to the proposed City Rail Link in Auckland ______________________________________________________________ EVIDENCE OF PETER CROSSAN ON BEHALF OF MEDIAWORKS NZ LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP) AND TVWORKS LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP) Dated: 26 July 2013 ______________________________________________________________ CEK-100742-1-31-V4 INTRODUCTION My full name is PETER GARY CROSSAN and I am the Chief Financial Officer at MediaWorks NZ Limited (in receivership). 1. I joined MediaWorks NZ Limited in December 1999 following a 15 year career in various manufacturing industries. After 13 years at MediaWorks NZ Limited, I believe I have insight and in-depth knowledge of the wider television industry. 2. I am a qualified Chartered Accountant and have a B Comm from Auckland University. 3. I am authorised to give evidence on behalf of MediaWorks NZ Limited and TVWorks Limited (in receivership) (collectively referred to in this statement as “MediaWorks”) in relation to the City Rail Link Project (“the Project”). TVWorks Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of MediaWorks NZ Limited. MEDIAWORKS 4. MediaWorks is an independent commercial (non-state funded) broadcaster. It provides TV, Radio and Interactive services: a. MediaWorks TV encompasses the national stations TV3 and FOUR. b. MediaWorks Radio operates out of 23 markets and consists of the nationwide brands MORE FM, RadioLIVE, The Sound, The Edge, The Breeze, The Rock, Mai FM, George FM, LiveSPORT and Kiwi FM, as well as Times FM in Orewa, Radio Dunedin and Coromandel FM. c. -
New Thoughts on the Public Sphere in Aotearoa New Zealand
SCOOPED: THE POLITICS AND POWER OF JOURNALISM IN AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND CHAPTER !: NEW THOUGHTS ON THE PUBLIC SPHERE IN AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND Wayne Hope The idea of a public sphere is made possible by the guaranteed freedoms of association, expression and publication. Citizens, groups and intellectuals are able to confer without restriction on matters of shared interest. In principle, public sphere activities should proceed independently of state prerogatives, religious authority and commercial influence. In practice, public sphere activities may fall short of these underlying principles. As Jurgen Habermas noted in his early writings, the Western, 18th-century bourgeoisie saw itself as the bearer of Enlightenment reason and constitutional freedoms. By the mid-19th century, however, non-property owners made their own public sphere claims against the bourgeoisie. Trade unionists and the early women’s movement, for example, demanded a fully franchised electoral system (Habermas, 1992). Furthermore, rights of representation and public argumentation were directed against private owners of capital and the bourgeois state. Early industrial capitalism and the bourgeois public sphere were vulnerable to oppositional challenge from socialist points of view. In Western societies the subsequent formation of representative political parties, trade union organisations, and tax funded institutions of health, education and social welfare were the outcomes of political struggles for universal rights and entitlements. Public sphere activities can be evaluated within legal environments, artistic and literary communities, political parties, the scholarly commons, legislatures and media institutions. Overlapping manifestations of the public sphere reflect the structures and instabilities of political-economic power. At given historical conjunctures, oppositional public spheres may crystallise. -
Global Capital and Media Communication Ownership in New Zealand
MEDIA, CULTURAL DIVERSITY AND COMMUNITY Global capital and media communication ownership in New Zealand ABSTRACT This article identifies recent developments in the ownership and manage- ment of New Zealand media institutions since Bill Rosenberg’s 2009 article in Pacific Journalism Review. New Zealand is enmeshed within global capitalism; a reality which shapes contemporary ownership pat- terns. Often the media ownership discussion in New Zealand is centred on media moguls, but they are answerable to their investors, sharehol- ders, international investment banks, fund managers and venture capitalists whose primary objective is to maximise profit rates. New Zealand media corporations treat news as a commodity and news organisations as revenue generators. Consequently, public media space is shrinking as the practice of journalism declines. Keywords: Media ownership, convergence, global capitalism, financial institutions, concentration MERJA MYLLYLAHTI and WAYNE HOPE AUT University, Auckland HE OWNERSHIP structure of New Zealand’s news media is not dramatically different to that in 2008 when Rosenberg delivered his Tlast media ownership report (Rosenberg, 2008). As he observed three years ago: four companies, all overseas owned, dominate the New Zealand news media. There is a near duopoly in two of the three main media—print and radio—a monopoly in pay television, and only three significant competitors in free-to-air television including the state-owned chan- nels. (Rosenberg, 2008) 188 PACIFIC JOURNALISM REVIEW 17 (2) 2011 MEDIA, CULTURAL DIVERSITY AND COMMUNITY In 2009, Rosenberg noted that his earlier observation was still valid: It is remarkable that ownership of the media has remained largely stable during the year. This is as much a result of the credit crunch as despite it: one of the major owners tried to sell and failed. -
New Zealand Media Ownership 2018
NEW ZEALAND MEDIA OWNERSHIP 2019 AUT research center for Journalism, Media and Democracy (JMAD) Dr Merja Myllylahti (Lead-author) Dr Sarah Baker (Co-author) Date 05/12/2019 ABOUT THIS REPORT This report is part of an ongoing series of reports on New Zealand media ownership. Since 2011, AUT research center for Journalism, Media and Democracy (JMAD) has published reports which document and analyse developments within New Zealand media. These incorporate media ownership, market structures, and key events during each year. The reports are freely available and accessible to anyone via the JMAD research center: https://www.aut.ac.nz/study/study-options/communication- studies/research/journalism,-media-and-democracy-research-centre Recommended citation: Myllylahti, M. & Baker, S. (2019). JMAD New Zealand media ownership report 2019. Auckland: AUT research center for Journalism, Media and Democracy. Retrieved from https://www.aut.ac.nz/study/study-options/communication- studies/research/journalism,-media-and-democracy-research-centre This report is covered by the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International: When reproducing any part of this report – including tables and graphs – full attribution must be given to the report author(s). 1 JMAD RESEARCH TEAM PROFESSOR WAYNE HOPE IS CO-DIRECTOR OF JMAD RESEARCH CENTER. HE IS ALSO CO- FOUNDER OF THE CENTER WHICH WAS ESTABLISHED IN 2010. HE IS ALSO A RESEARCHER AND LECTURER AT THE AUT SCHOOL OF COMMUNICATION STUDIES. DR MERJA MYLLYLAHTI IS CO-DIRECTOR AT JMAD RESEARCH CENTRE, AND LEAD-AUTHOR OF THE JMAD NEW ZEALAND MEDIA OWNERSHIP REPORTS. SHE IS ALSO A RESEARCHER AND LECTURER AT THE AUT SCHOOL OF COMMUNICATION STUDIES. -
News Media Ownership in New Zealand Bill Rosenberg
News media ownership in New Zealand Bill Rosenberg Introduction................................................................................................................... 1 Who owns what? .......................................................................................................... 2 Print media................................................................................................................................. 2 John Fairfax Holdings Limited................................................................................................ 2 APN News and Media............................................................................................................ 5 Allied Press and remaining independents ............................................................................. 7 Magazines.............................................................................................................................. 8 Television................................................................................................................................. 12 MediaWorks: TV3 and C4.................................................................................................... 12 Prime Television................................................................................................................... 13 Digital television – Freeview ................................................................................................ 15 Other free-to-air television ..................................................................................................