Language Ideologies:Bridging the Gap Between Social Structures and Local Practices Introduction to the Colloquium

Home , Social semiotics, Variation (linguistics)

Language Ideologies:Bridging the Gap between Social Structures and Local Practices Introduction to the Colloquium

Brigitta Busch ¨ Jürgen Spitzmüller University of Vienna ¨ Department of Linguistics

Sociolinguistics Symposium öw Murcia, wÏ/.Ï/ö.wÏ Bridging what?

Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller

Bridging what?

Stance and Metapragmatics Indexical Anchors ‚ Local indexicality – stance and social positions Programme ‚ Social indexicality – language ideologies

ö¨öö Bridging what?

Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller

Bridging what?

Stance and Metapragmatics Indexical Anchors ‚ Local indexicality – stance and social positions Programme ‚ Social indexicality – language ideologies

ö¨öö Social Positioning and Stance (as Local Practices) Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller ‚ Davies,Bronwyn/Harré, Rom (wRR.). Positioning. The Discourse Production of Selves. In: Journal for the Theory

Bridging what? of Social Behaviour ö./w, pp. ÿé–Ïé. Stance and Metapragmatics ‚ Wortham, Stanton (ö...). Interactional Positioning and

Indexical Anchors Narrative Self-Construction. In: Narrative Inquiry

Programme wR/wóÅ-wÏÿ . ‚ Englebretson, Robert (ed.) (ö..Å). Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity,Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins (Pragmatics & Beyond, N. S. wÏÿ). ‚ Deppermann,Arnulf (ö.wó). Positioning. In:Anna de Fina/Alexandra Georgakopoulou (eds.): The Handbook of Narrative Analysis.Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. éÏR–éÏÅ. ‚ amongst many more

é¨öö Social Positioning and Stance (as Local Practices – within Discursive Frames) Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller

Bridging what? ‚ Bamberg, Michael (wRRÅ). Positioning Between Structure

Stance and and Performance. In: Journal of Narrative and Life History Metapragmatics Å/w-ÿ, pp. ééó–éÿö. Indexical Anchors ‚ Bamberg, Michael/Georgakopoulou,Alexandra (ö..Ï). Programme Small Stories as a New Perspective in Narrative and Identity Analysis. In: Text and Talk öÏ/é, pp. éÅÅ–éRÏ. ‚ De Fina, Anna (ö.wé). Positioning Level é. Connecting Local Identity Displays to Macro Social Processes. In: Narrative Inquiry öé/w, pp. ÿ.–Ïw. ‚ and others

ÿ¨öö Language Ideologies (as Discursive Practices) Introduction to the Colloquium ‚ Silverstein, Michael (wRÅR).L anguage Structure and Busch/Spitzmüller Linguistic Ideology. In: Paul R. Cline/William Hanks/Carol Hofbauer (eds.): The Elements:A Parasession on Linguistic Bridging what? Units and Levels. Chicago:Chicago Linguistic Society, Stance and Metapragmatics pp. wRé–öÿÅ. Indexical Anchors ‚ Woolard, Kathryn A./Schieéelin, Bambi B. (wRRÿ). Programme Language Ideology. In: Annual Review of Anthropology öé, pp. óó–Ïö. ‚ Kroskrity, Paul V./Schieéelin, Bambi B./Woolard, Kathryn A.(Eds.) (wRRÏ). Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory.N ew York: Oxford University Press (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics wÏ). ‚ Joseph, John E./Taylor, Talbot J. (Eds.) (wRR.). Ideologies of Language. London/New York: Routledge (Routledge Politics of Language Series). ‚ etc. etc. etc. ó¨öö The Emergence of Ideology (Iconization,Enregisterment) Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller ‚ Irvine, Judith T./Gal, Susan (ö...).L anguage Ideology and Linguistic Diéerentiation. In: Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.): Bridging what? Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Stance and Oxford: Currey (School of American Research Advanced Metapragmatics Seminar Series), pp. éó–Ïÿ. Indexical Anchors Programme ‚ Agha, Asif (ö..é). The Social Life of a Cultural Value. In: Language & Communication öé, pp. öéw–öÅé. ‚ Agha, Asif (ö..Å). Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language öÿ). ‚ Johnstone, Barbara/Andrus, Jennifer/Danielson, Andrew E. (ö..Ï).Mo bility, Indexicality, and the Enregisterment of “Pittsburghese”. In: Journal of English Linguistics éÿ/ö, pp. ÅÅ–w.ÿ.

Ï¨öö Stancetaking (as a Discursive Practice) Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller

Bridging what?

Stance and ‚ Johnstone, Barbara (ö..Å). Linking Dialect and Identity Metapragmatics Through Stancetaking. In: Robert Englebretson (ed.): Indexical Anchors Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity,Evaluation, Programme Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins (Pragmatics & Beyond, N. S. wÏÿ), pp. ÿR–ÏÏ. ‚ Jaée, Alexandra (ed.) (ö..R). Stance. Sociolinguistic Perspectives.N ew York: Oxford University Press (Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics).

Å¨öö Social Positioning

Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller “‘Positioning’ is designed as an alternative to studying the Bridging what? subject in terms of an overarching identity. [...] Positioning is Stance and Metapragmatics a non-essentialist and practice-bound concept. Positions are

Indexical Anchors accomplished by social practice [...]. Practices are routine,

Programme habitual ways of speaking and interacting, which are sensitive to situational contingencies. [...] Positions are meaningful, semiotically structured ascriptions.”

Deppermann,Arnulf (ö.wó). Positioning. In:Anna de Fina/Alexandra Georgakopoulou (eds.): The Handbook of Narrative Analysis.Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. éÏR–éÏÅ, quot.: pp. éÏR–éÅ..

Ï¨öö Stance

Introduction to the Colloquium “Stance is a public act by a social actor, achieved dialogically Busch/Spitzmüller through overt communicative means, of simultaneously evaluating objects, positioning subjects (self and others), and Bridging what? aligning with other subjects, with respect to any salient Stance and dimension of the sociocultural íeld.” Metapragmatics

Indexical Anchors Du Bois, John W. (ö..Å). The Stance Triangle. In: Robert Programme Englebretson (ed.): Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins (Pragmatics & Beyond, N. S. wÏÿ), pp. wéR–wÏö, quot.: p. wÏé. “I evaluate something, and thereby position myself, and thereby align with you.”

R¨öö Stance

R¨öö The Stance Triangle Subject w Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller e va đ lu positionsate s § Bridging what?

Stance and § Metapragmatics Object Indexical Anchors ligns a Programme đ s § ate alu ev đ positions

Subject ö

Du Bois, John W. (ö..Å). The Stance Triangle. In: Robert Englebretson (ed.): Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins (Pragmatics & Beyond, N. S. wÏÿ), pp. wéR–wÏö, quot.: p. wÏé. w.¨öö The Stance Triangle Subject w Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller ev alu đ positionsa tes Bridging what? §

Stance and Metapragmatics § Object Indexical Anchors ligns a đ Programme § es at alu ev đ positions

Subject ö

Stance and Metapragmatics § Object Indexical Anchors ligns a Programme đ s § ate alu ev

đ positions

Subject ö

Stance and § Metapragmatics Object

Indexical Anchors ligns a

Programme đ s § ate alu ev đ positions

Subject ö

Du Bois, John W. (ö..Å). The Stance Triangle. In: Robert Englebretson (ed.): Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins (Pragmatics & Beyond, N. S. wÏÿ), pp. wéR–wÏö, quot.: p. wÏé. w.¨öö Du Bois, John W. (ö..Å). The Stance Triangle. In: Robert Englebretson (ed.): Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins (Pragmatics & Beyond, N. S. wÏÿ), pp. wéR–wÏö, quot.: p. wÏé.

The Stance Triangle – Adapted Subject w Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller e va đ lua positionste s § Bridging what?

Stance and § Metapragmatics Language use Indexical Anchors ligns a Programme đ § es at alu ev đ positions

Subject ö

ww¨öö Du Bois, John W. (ö..Å). The Stance Triangle. In: Robert Englebretson (ed.): Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins (Pragmatics & Beyond, N. S. wÏÿ), pp. wéR–wÏö, quot.: p. wÏé.

The Stance Triangle – Adapted Subject w Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller e va đ lu positionsat es Bridging what? §

Stance and Metapragmatics § Language use Indexical Anchors ligns a đ Programme § es at alu ev đ positions

Subject ö

The Stance Triangle – Adapted Subject w Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller ev đ alu positionsa te s § Bridging what?

Stance and Metapragmatics § Language use Indexical Anchors ligns a Programme đ § es at alu ev

đ positions

Subject ö

The Stance Triangle – Adapted Subject w Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller e va đ lua positionste s § Bridging what?

Stance and § Metapragmatics Language use

Indexical Anchors ligns a

Programme đ § es at alu ev đ positions

Subject ö

The Stance Triangle – Adapted Subject w Introduction to the Colloquium p er Busch/Spitzmüller forms/ đ ev positions alu a Bridging what? te s § Stance and § Metapragmatics Language use Indexical Anchors ligns a s § đ e Programme at alu ev

rforms/ pe đ positions

Subject ö

ww¨öö “Tactics of intersubjectivity”

Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller

Bridging what? w. Adequation and distinction Stance and Metapragmatics ö. Authentication and denaturalization Indexical Anchors é. Authorization and illegitimation Programme Bucholtz, Mary/Hall, Kira (ö..Ï).L anguage and Identity. In: Alessandro Duranti (ed.): ACompanion to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell (Blackwell Companions to Anthropology), pp. éÏR–éRÿ, quot.: pp. éÏö–éÏÅ.

wö¨öö Social Emblems

Introduction to the Colloquium “What is the rubric called ‘identity’ a name for? What are the Busch/Spitzmüller things it names? It is a way of talking about the emblematic functions of signs in behavior. An emblem is a thing to which Bridging what? a social persona is attached. It involves three elements; Stance and Metapragmatics (w) a perceivable thing, or diacritic; (ö) a social persona;

Indexical Anchors (é) someone for whom it is an emblem (i. e., someone who

Programme can read that persona from that thing). When a thing/diacritic is widely recognized as an emblem – when many people view it as marking the same social persona – I will say that it is enregistered as an emblem, or is an enregistered emblem. ‘Enregistered’ just means ‘widely recognized,’ and there are degrees of it.”

Agha, Asif (ö..Å). Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language öÿ), p. öéó. wé¨öö Register and Enregisterment

Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller “registers [are] culture-internal models of personhood linked to speech forms” Bridging what?

Stance and Agha, Asif (ö..Å). Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Metapragmatics Cambridge University Press (Studies in the Social and Cultural Indexical Anchors Foundations of Language öÿ), p. wéó. Programme “Enregisterment: processes and practices whereby performable signs become recognized (and regrouped) as belonging to distinct, diéerentially valorized semiotic registers by a population.”

Agha, Asif (ö..Å). Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language öÿ), p. Ïw.

wÿ¨öö Semiotic Register

Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller Persona

Bridging what? s § xe Stance and inde hed Metapragmatics ac att đ is a

đ r

Indexical Anchors c e

Programme onn Language use ec t ed § in đ de is x a es ttac § hed

Practices

wó¨öö Semiotic Register

Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller Persona

Bridging what? s § xe Stance and de ed Metapragmatics in h

ac đ att is a Indexical Anchors đ r c e

Programme onn

Language use ec t ed

in § de đ is a xe ttac s § hed

Practices

wó¨öö Semiotic Register

Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller Persona

Bridging what? s § xe Stance and inde ed Metapragmatics h ac đ att a Indexical Anchors r đ is c e Programme onn

Language use ec t ed § đ inde is x a es ttac § hed

Practices

wó¨öö Semiotic Register

Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller Persona

Bridging what? s § xe

Stance and đ inde hed Metapragmatics a ttac a r is c e Indexical Anchors đ onn Programme Language use ec t ed in

đ de § is x a es ttac § hed

Practices

wó¨öö Semiotic Register

Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller Persona

Bridging what? s § xe Stance and inde hed Metapragmatics ac att đ is a

đ r

Indexical Anchors c e

Programme onn Language use ec t ed § in đ de is x a es ttac § hed

Practices

wó¨öö Language Ideologies

Introduction to the Colloquium Language (use) Busch/Spitzmüller

Bridging what?

Stance and Metapragmatics đ § Indexical Anchors In y de lit Programme x ica ica x lit de y In § đ Language Ideologies

Actors Practices đ Indexicality § wÏ¨öö Metapragmatic Positioning

Micro level Introduction to the Colloquium Actor w Busch/Spitzmüller pe rforms/ đ e positionsva Bridging what? lua tes Stance and §

Metapragmatics §

Indexical Anchors Language use ligns a

đ § Programme es at alu ev rforms/ pe đ positions

Actor ö

Cf. Spitzmüller, Jürgen (ö.wó). Graphic Variation and Graphic Ideologies:A Metapragmatic Approach. In: Social Semiotics öó/ö (thematic issue “Typographic Landscapes”, ed. by Johan Järlehed and Adam Jaworski), pp. wöÏ–wÿw. wÅ¨öö Metapragmatic Positioning Micro level Introduction to the Colloquium Actor w Busch/Spitzmüller pe rforms/

đ positionsev Bridging what? alu a te Stance and s §

Metapragmatics §

Indexical Anchors Language use ligns a s § đ e Programme at alu ev

rforms/ pe đ positions

Actor ö

Metapragmatics §

Indexical Anchors Language use ligns a

đ § Programme es at alu ev

rforms/ pe đ positions

Actor ö

pe rforms/ đ e Bridging what? positionsva lua tes Stance and § Metapragmatics §

Indexical Anchors Language use ligns

a § Programme đ es at alu ev rforms/ pe đ positions

Actor ö

Micro level Introduction to the Colloquium Actor w Persona Busch/Spitzmüller pe rforms/ s § đ e xe positionsva Bridging what? lu de hed at in e ac đ s att Stance and § is a đ r c e

Metapragmatics § onn

Indexical Anchors Language use ec ligns a t ed đ § Programme es at in § alu de ev đ is a xe ttac s rforms/ h § pe ed đ positions

Actor ö Practices

Micro level Introduction to the Colloquium Actor w Persona Busch/Spitzmüller pe rforms/ s § đ e xe positionsva de Bridging what? lu in hed at es ac đ Stance and § tt a

a r is c e

Metapragmatics § đ onn

Indexical Anchors Language use ec ligns a t ed đ § Programme es at § alu đ in ev is de a xe tt s § rforms/ ac pe h đ positions ed

Actor ö Practices

Micro level Introduction to the Colloquium Actor w Persona Busch/Spitzmüller pe rforms/ § es đ positionsev x a đ Bridging what? lu inde hed

a a te ttac s § a r Stance and đ is c e §

Metapragmatics onn

Indexical Anchors Language use ligns ec a đ § t Programme es ed at alu in v đ de § e is x a es ttac § rforms/ h pe ed đ positions

Actor ö Practices

Cf. Spitzmüller, Jürgen (ö.wó). Graphic Variation and Graphic Ideologies:A Metapragmatic Approach. In: Social Semiotics öó/ö (thematic issue “Typographic Landscapes”, ed. by Johan Järlehed and Adam Jaworski), pp. wöÏ–wÿw. wÅ¨öö Metapragmatic Positioning Micro level Introduction to aligns § the Colloquium Actor w/ö Persona Busch/Spitzmüller

pe rforms/ s § đ e xe positionsva Bridging what? lu inde hed at ac

e đ s § att Stance and is a

đ r Metapragmatics c e § onn Indexical Anchors Language use ec ligns a t ed đ § Programme es at § lu in va đ de e is x a es orms/ ttac § rf h pe ed đ positions

Actor ö/w Practices

Cf. Spitzmüller, Jürgen (ö.wó). Graphic Variation and Graphic Ideologies:A Metapragmatic Approach. In: Social Semiotics öó/ö (thematic issue “Typographic Landscapes”, ed. by Johan Järlehed and Adam Jaworski), pp. wöÏ–wÿw. wÅ¨öö Metapragmatic Positioning Micro level Introduction to aligns § the Colloquium Actor w/ö Persona Busch/Spitzmüller pe rforms/ s § đ e xe positionsva Bridging what? lu inde hed at ac e đ s att § is a Stance and đ r c e

Metapragmatics § onn Language use ec

Indexical Anchors ligns a t ed đ § Programme es at § alu in ev đ is de a xe tt s § rforms/ ac pe hed đ positions

Actor ö/w Practices đ positions

Metapragmatics § onn Language use

Indexical Anchors ec ligns a t ed đ § Programme es at § lu in va đ de e is x a es orms/ ttac § rf h pe ed đ positions

Actor ö/w Practices đ positions

Metapragmatics § onn Language use

Indexical Anchors ec ligns a t ed đ § Programme es at § lu in va đ de e is x a es orms/ ttac § rf h pe ed đ positions

Actor ö/w Practices đ positions

Micro level Macro level Introduction to the Colloquium aligns § Actor w/ö Persona Busch/Spitzmüller pe rforms/ s § đ e xe positionsva Bridging what? lu inde hed at ac e đ s § att Stance and is a đ r c e

Metapragmatics § onn Language use

Indexical Anchors ec ligns a t ed đ § Programme es at § lu in va đ de e is x a es orms/ ttac § rf h pe ed đ positions

Actor ö/w Practices đ positions

Body

Time

Space

Indexical Anchors

Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller

Bridging what?

Stance and Metapragmatics Subject

Indexical Anchors

Programme

wÏ¨öö Indexical Anchors

Introduction to the Colloquium Actors Busch/Spitzmüller

Bridging what?

Stance and Metapragmatics Body Subject

Indexical Anchors

Programme

Time

Space

wÏ¨öö Indexical Anchors

Introduction to the Colloquium Actors Busch/Spitzmüller §

positions Bridging what?

Stance and đ positions Metapragmatics Body Subject

Indexical Anchors positions Programme §

Time

positions

Space

wÏ¨öö Indexical Anchors

Introduction to the Colloquium Actors Busch/Spitzmüller § § ent erm egist § đ enr positions nt e

Bridging what? rm e đ e gist nr e e Stance and đ positions nr gist e e Body Subject đ rm Metapragmatics e nt §

Indexical Anchors đ enre gist erm ent § positions Programme §

đ enre gist erm ent § đ e nr e Time gist §

e nt rm e

e rm nt e positions § đ gist e

nr e đ § ent erm egist đ enr

Space

wÏ¨öö Approaching the Subject

Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller “I say: the category of the subject is constitutive of all ideology, but at the same time and immediately I add that Bridging what? the category of the subject is only constitutive of all ideology Stance and Metapragmatics insofar as all ideology has the function (which deínes it) of

Indexical Anchors ‘constituting’ concrete individuals as subjects. In the

Programme interaction of this double constitution exists the functioning of all ideology, ideology being nothing but its functioning in the material forms of existence of that functioning.”

Althusser, Louis (wRÅw).I deology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation). In: Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays, ed. by Louis Althusser. London: New Left Book, pp. wöÅ–wÏÏ [Fr. orig.: Idéologie et appareils idéologiques d’état (Notes pour une recherche) in: La Pensée wów (wRÅ.), p. é–éÏ], quot.: p. wó.

wR¨öö Approaching the Subject

Introduction to the Colloquium Busch/Spitzmüller

Bridging what? “[...] I propose that agency begins where sovereignty wanes. Stance and Metapragmatics The one who acts (who is not the same as the sovereign Indexical Anchors subject) acts precisely to the extent that he or she is Programme constituted as an actor and, hence, operating within a linguistic íeld of enabling constraints from the outset.”

Butler, Judith (wRRÅ). Excitable speech. A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge, p. wÏ.

ö.¨öö Programme

Introduction to the Colloquium Emi Otsuji/Alastair Pennycook (Univ. of Technology, Sydney): Busch/Spitzmüller Lingoing and languages: Interpreting the local construction of language ideologies Bridging what? Jonas Hassemer (Univ. of Vienna): Resignifying social positions. Stance and Metapragmatics Metapragmatics and the performativity of the subject Indexical Anchors Tim McNamara (Univ. of Melbourne): Performativity and the Programme gendered subject: Social structures and local practice Margarita Giannoutsou/Jannis Androutsopoulos (Univ. of Hamburg): Investigating language ideologies in the production of academic discourse Ana Deumert (Univ. of Cape Town): ‘We need a new language’ – Challenging the coloniality of language Alexandra Jaée (California State Univ. Long Beach):C oncluding discussion

öw¨öö References

Introduction to the Colloquium ‚ Agha, Asif (ö..é). The Social Life of a Cultural Value. In: Language & Busch/Spitzmüller Communication öé, pp. öéw–öÅé. ‚ Agha, Asif (ö..Å). Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge References University Press (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language öÿ). ‚ Althusser, Louis (wRÅw).I deology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation). In: Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays, ed. by Louis Althusser. London: New Left Book, pp. wöÅ–wÏÏ [Fr. orig.: Idéologie et appareils idéologiques d’état (Notes pour une recherche) in: La Pensée wów (wRÅ.), p. é–éÏ]. ‚ Bamberg, Michael (wRRÅ). Positioning Between Structure and Performance. In: Journal of Narrative and Life History Å/w-ÿ, pp. ééó–éÿö. ‚ Bamberg, Michael/Georgakopoulou,Alexandra (ö..Ï). Small Stories as a New Perspective in Narrative and Identity Analysis. In: Text and Talk öÏ/é, pp. éÅÅ–éRÏ. ‚ Bucholtz, Mary/Hall, Joan Kelly (forthc.). Embodied Sociolinguistics. In: Nikolas Coupland (ed.): Sociolinguistics. Theoretical Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

öö¨öö References( cont.) ‚ Bucholtz, Mary/Hall, Kira (ö..Ï).L anguage and Identity. In:Alessandro Introduction to the Colloquium Duranti (ed.): ACompanion to Linguistic Anthropology.Oxford/Cambridge: Busch/Spitzmüller Blackwell (Blackwell Companions to Anthropology), pp. éÏR–éRÿ. ‚ Busch,Brigitta (in press). Expanding the Notion of the Linguistic Repertoire: On the Concept of Spracherleben – The Lived Experience of References Language. In: Applied Linguistics. URL: http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/ content/early/ö.wó/.Å/öé/applin.amv.é..full.pdf+html <.ÿ/öÏ/ö.wÏ>. ‚ Butler, Judith (wRRÅ). Excitable speech. A Politics of the Performative.N ew York: Routledge. ‚ Davies,Bronwyn/Harré, Rom (wRR.). Positioning. The Discourse Production of Selves. In: Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour ö./w, pp. ÿé–Ïé. ‚ De Fina, Anna (ö.wé). Positioning Level é. Connecting Local Identity Displays to Macro Social Processes. In: Narrative Inquiry öé/w, pp. ÿ.–Ïw. ‚ Deppermann,Arnulf (ö.wó). Positioning. In:Anna de Fina/Alexandra Georgakopoulou (eds.): The Handbook of Narrative Analysis.Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. éÏR–éÏÅ. ‚ Du Bois, John W. (ö..Å). The Stance Triangle. In: Robert Englebretson (ed.): Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity,Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins (Pragmatics & Beyond, N. S. wÏÿ), pp. wéR–wÏö.

öé¨öö References( cont.) ‚ Englebretson, Robert (ed.) (ö..Å). Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity, Introduction to the Colloquium Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins (Pragmatics Busch/Spitzmüller & Beyond, N. S. wÏÿ). ‚ Irvine, Judith T./Gal, Susan (ö...).L anguage Ideology and Linguistic Diéerentiation. In: Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.): Regimes of Language: Ideologies, References Polities, and Identities.Oxford: Currey (School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series), pp. éó–Ïÿ. ‚ Jaée, Alexandra (ed.) (ö..R). Stance. Sociolinguistic Perspectives.N ew York: Oxford University Press (Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics). ‚ Johnstone, Barbara (ö..Å). Linking Dialect and Identity Through Stancetaking. In: Robert Englebretson (ed.): Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity,Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins (Pragmatics & Beyond, N. S. wÏÿ), pp. ÿR–ÏÏ. ‚ Johnstone, Barbara/Andrus, Jennifer/Danielson,Andrew E. (ö..Ï). Mobility, Indexicality, and the Enregisterment of “Pittsburghese”. In: Journal of English Linguistics éÿ/ö, pp. ÅÅ–w.ÿ. ‚ Joseph, John E./Taylor, Talbot J. (Eds.) (wRR.). Ideologies of Language. London/New York: Routledge (Routledge Politics of Language Series). ‚ Kroskrity, Paul V./Schieéelin, Bambi B./Woolard, Kathryn A.(Eds.) (wRRÏ). Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory.N ew York: Oxford University Press (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics wÏ).

öÿ¨öö References( cont.)

Introduction to the Colloquium ‚ Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (ö..ö). Phenomenology of perception. London: Busch/Spitzmüller Routledge & Kegan Paul [Fr. orig.: Phénoménologie de la perception.Paris: Gallimard wRÿó]. ‚ Reckwitz,Andreas (ö..Ï). Das hybride Subjekt. Eine Theorie der References Subjektkulturen von der bürgerlichen Moderne zur Postmoderne. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft. ‚ Silverstein, Michael (wRÅR).L anguage Structure and Linguistic Ideology. In: Paul R. Cline/William Hanks/Carol Hofbauer (eds.): The Elements:A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels. Chicago:Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. wRé–öÿÅ. ‚ Spitzmüller, Jürgen (ö.wó). Graphic Variation and Graphic Ideologies:A Metapragmatic Approach. In: Social Semiotics öó/ö (thematic issue “Typographic Landscapes”, ed. by Johan Järlehed and Adam Jaworski), pp. wöÏ–wÿw. ‚ Woolard, Kathryn A./Schieéelin, Bambi B. (wRRÿ).L anguage Ideology. In: Annual Review of Anthropology öé, pp. óó–Ïö. ‚ Wortham, Stanton (ö...). Interactional Positioning and Narrative Self-Construction. In: Narrative Inquiry wR/wóÅ-wÏÿ.

öó¨öö