DOCSLIB.ORG

Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Sweetwater Dam and South Dike Improvements Project State Clearinghouse Number: TBD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Sweetwater Dam and South Dike Improvements Project State Clearinghouse Number: TBD Draft November 2017 Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Sweetwater Dam and South Dike Improvements Project State Clearinghouse Number: TBD Prepared for: Sweetwater Authority 505 Garrett Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 Prepared by: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 9210 Sky Park Court, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92123 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE SWEETWATER DAM AND SOUTH DIKE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Prepared for: Sweetwater Authority 505 Garrett Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 Prepared by: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 9210 Sky Park Court, Suite 200 San Diego, California Reviewed by: Sweetwater Authority Ron R. Mosher, Director of Engineering Michael Garrod, Engineering Manager Pete Famolaro, Biologist Israel Marquez, Environmental Specialist November 2017 Sweetwater Authority Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration Sweetwater Dam and South Dike Improvements Project November 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................... iv 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Location ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Environmental Setting ............................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Surrounding Land Uses ............................................................................. 3 1.3 Project Background ............................................................................................... 3 1.4 Project Objectives and Scope ............................................................................... 8 1.5 Project Elements ................................................................................................... 8 1.5.1 Sweetwater Dam Improvements ............................................................... 8 1.5.2 South Spillway Improvements ................................................................. 13 1.5.3 South Dike Improvements ....................................................................... 14 1.5.4 Fishing Program Access Road Realignment ........................................... 17 1.5.5 Trail Realignment .................................................................................... 17 1.5.6 South Abutment Access Road Improvements ......................................... 17 1.6 Project Design Considerations ............................................................................ 18 1.7 Project Construction ............................................................................................ 20 1.7.1 Construction Timing and Phasing ............................................................ 20 1.7.2 Construction Equipment and Staging Areas ............................................ 21 1.7.3 Construction Haul Routes ........................................................................ 22 1.7.4 Construction Activities ............................................................................. 22 1.8 Required Agency Review and Permit Approvals ................................................. 23 2.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ........................................................... 25 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED .......................................... 26 4.0 DETERMINATION .......................................................................................................... 27 4.1 Aesthetics ............................................................................................................ 28 4.1.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 28 4.1.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 29 4.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources ................................................................... 31 4.2.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 32 4.2.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 32 4.3 Air Quality ............................................................................................................ 33 4.3.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 33 4.3.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 34 4.4 Biological Resources ........................................................................................... 39 4.4.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 40 4.4.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 47 4.5 Cultural Resources .............................................................................................. 61 4.5.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 61 4.5.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 64 4.6 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................... 68 4.6.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 69 4.6.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 70 Page i Sweetwater Authority Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration Sweetwater Dam and South Dike Improvements Project November 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................ 73 4.7.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 73 4.7.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 74 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ...................................................................... 75 4.8.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 76 4.8.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 76 4.9 Hydrology and Water Quality............................................................................... 79 4.9.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 80 4.9.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 82 4.10 Land Use and Planning ....................................................................................... 84 4.10.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 84 4.10.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 84 4.11 Mineral Resources .............................................................................................. 86 4.11.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 86 4.11.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 86 4.12 Noise ................................................................................................................... 87 4.12.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 87 4.12.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 88 4.13 Population and Housing ...................................................................................... 91 4.13.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 91 4.13.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 91 4.14 Public Services .................................................................................................... 92 4.14.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 92 4.14.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 93 4.15 Recreation ........................................................................................................... 94 4.15.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 94 4.15.2 Discussion ............................................................................................... 94 4.16 Transportation/Traffic .......................................................................................... 97 4.16.1 Existing Setting ........................................................................................ 98 4.16.2 Discussion ..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Open Space and Agriculture (OS)
    Part Three: General Plan Elements – Open Space and Agriculture Open Space and Agriculture (OS) A. Introduction State law requires the Open Space Element to provide plans and measures for the preservation and conservation of open-space lands, which can include open space for the preservation of natural resources; the managed production Refer to the Safety Element of resources (including agricultural lands); outdoor for Open Space recreation (including areas of historic and cultural value, related to Public areas suited for park and recreation purposes, access to Health and Safety. beaches, rivers and streams, and areas which serve as links Refer to the between major recreation and open-space reservations); Safety and Land open space for public health and safety; open space in Use Element for a support of the mission of military installations, and open discussion of space for Native American historical, cultural, or sacred military sites1. installations. Approximately five percent of the planning area is dedicated to open space, parks, and agricultural uses. Only 2.3 percent of land within the planning area remains vacant. Parks – Open Due to the highly developed nature of the community, the space lands whose City faces significant challenges in the provision of primary purpose is recreation additional open space and recreational facilities. (Institute for Local Despite a lack of vacant land, opportunities exist within the Government) urban fabric of the community to provide new recreational and open space areas. Possible solutions include: rooftop gardens; closing or converting a limited number of redundant streets for the purpose of creating mini parks, community gardens, and plazas; incorporating trail systems into utility corridors; turning vacant parcels into parks or community gardens; and the enhancement of public street rights-of-way for use as open space.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweetwater Regional Park
    Welcome to Sweetwater Regional Park You’ll find more outdoor RULES & REGULATIONS SWEETWATER adventures in these other CAMPFIRES: Must be confined to existing barbeques or fire rings. See ranger for current campfire rules. SUMMIT San Diego County PETS: Pets are permitted if they are properly restrained and under the control of the camping parks! owner. Dogs must be licensed, restrained on a CAMPGROUND leash not longer than six feet, and attended at all times. A San Diego County Agua Caliente – A very popular park during WASTE WATER: Please dispose of all waste water in an the winter, this desert oasis 20 miles south of approved dump station, never on the ground. Camping Park Borrego Springs is known for its beauty and VEGETATION & All plants, animals, natural features, solitude, and for the soothing mineral waters o the west you can see San Diego Bay and the downtown San Diego, so in a matter of minutes NATURAL and archaeological resources are fully in its two naturally fed pools. FEATURES: protected and may not be damaged, injured, TPacific Ocean. To the east are majestic views of you can get from your campsite to the Gaslamp or removed. Please check with your ranger the Sweetwater Reservoir and rugged backcountry Quarter and its fine dining, or to the world famous for firewood — he or she generally has a mountains. You’re standing in the campground of San Diego Zoo and museums of Balboa Park. There Dos Picos – Sheltered by steep, boulder-strewn supply to sell for campfires. Please do not Sweetwater Regional Park, and surrounding you are several golf courses nearby, and Sweetwater mountain slopes, this park near Ramona is gather it from within the park.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweetwater Community Plan San Diego County General Plan
    Sweetwater Community Plan San Diego County General Plan Adopted August 25, 1977 Amended July 1, 2009 - GPA 04-010 Adopted August 3, 2011 Amended June 18, 2014 – GPA 12-007 Statement of Intent .................................................. 1 Policy Code Explanation ......................................... 2 Introduction .............................................................. 3 1 – Community Character .......................................... 5 2 – Land Use ............................................................. 8 3 – Housing ............................................................. 11 4 – Circulation .......................................................... 12 5 – Public Facilities, Safety & Education .................. 14 6 – Conservation...................................................... 19 7 – Recreation ......................................................... 26 8 – Scenic Highways ............................................... 28 9 – Seismic Safety ................................................... 29 10 – Open Space ..................................................... 30 11 – Noise ............................................................... 31 Appendix .................................................................. 33 CERTI FICATE OF ADOPTION I hereby eertify that this Plan, consisting of text and exhibits, is the Sweetwater Community Plan and is a part of the San Diego County General Plan, and that it was considered by nine hearings that oecurred frorn 10, and adoPted bY the San Diego 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweetwater Dam: Then and Now
    Sweetwater Dam: Then and Now By Richard A. Reynolds August 2, 2008 Sweetwater Dam: Then and Now Sweetwater Dam is a very important element of the water supply to the South Bay communities. It is the key to treatment and distribution of local runoff and imported supplies. This year is the 120lh in its long history in this important role. The dam, as you will see in this paper, has withstood many challenges and trials from storms that brought runoff flows from the watershed to the 100-year storm levels. A major storm in 1895, only seven years after completion of the dam, overtopped the dam by nearly two feet. This was proof of the core strength of the gravity arch configuration to withstand hydraulic forces. Sweetwater Dam, when completed in its initial configuration on April 7, 1888 (Figure 1), represented the latest design concept for masonry dams and, at its original completed height of 90 feet, was the tallest masonry, gravity arch dam in the United States. It was completed just in time to quench the thirst of South Bay residents and to ensure their hopes for land speculation, municipal growth and agricultural success. In his Nobel Prize winning novel, "East of Eden", John Steinbeck was describing people in California (albeit, in the Salinas Valley) and their awareness of water conditions in general when he wrote, "And it never failed that during the dry years the people forgot about the rich years, and during the wet years they lost all memory of the dry years. It was always that way." And so it was here in the South Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Water- and Air-Quality Monitoring of Sweetwater Reservoir Watershed, San Diego County, California—Phase One Results Continued, 2001–2003
    Prepared in cooperation with the SWEETWATER AUTHORITY Water- and Air-Quality Monitoring of the Sweetwater Reservoir Watershed, San Diego County, California— Phase One Results, Continued, 2001-2003 Data Series Report 347 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water- and Air-Quality Monitoring of Sweetwater Reservoir Watershed, San Diego County, California—Phase One Results Continued, 2001–2003 By Gregory O. Mendez, William T. Foreman, Andrew Morita, and Michael S. Majewski Prepared in cooperation with the Sweetwater Authority Data Series 347 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Mendez, G.O., Foreman, W.T., Morita, Andrew, and Majewski, M.S., 2008, Water- and air-quality monitoring of Sweetwater Reservoir Watershed, San Diego County, California—Phase One Results Continued, 2001–2003: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 347, 158 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Features in River Basins in Study Area, Coastal San Diego County, California
    Installation of multiple-depth monitoring wells in San Diego Couny 2008–PLATE 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH Danskin, W.R., 2008 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SWEETWATER AUTHORITY, OTAY WATER DISTRICT, AND CITY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego River Basin Study, 2008 117 30’ 117 15’ 117 00’ 116 45’ 116 30’ 116 15’ 116 00’ 33 15’ SALTON SEA Oceanside Vista Carlsbad San Marcos EscondidoCreek Creek Lake Ysabel Sutherland Santa Escondido San Dieguito River Basin Encinitas Lake Hodges 33 00’ Solana Beach San Diego River Basin Lake Cuyamaca Del Mar Laguna Mountains Penasquitos watershed Miramar San Vicente La Jolla Reservoir Reservoir Canyon El Capitan Santee Reservoir San Diego County Area of Plate 3 (scale: 1:48,000) Imperial County r River El Cajon Sweetwater River Basin Diego Loveland San La Mesa Reservoir 32 River 45’ Pueblo watershed San Diego Sweetwater Pacific Reservoir Point Loma Barrett Wastewater Otay River Basin Lake Treatment Plant National City Lake Point Loma Morena ocean outfall Sweetwater California Chula Vista Lower Otay Reservoir Creek Baja California United States Otay River Mexico Ocean Cottonwood South Bay Tecate Wastewater 18,970 ft Treatment Plant South Bay 4,670 ft ocean outfall 32 Tijuana 30’ Area of Plate 2 (scale: 1:100,000) Islas Presa Aberardo L. De Los Rodriguez Coronados Tijuana River Basin Rosarito 32 15’ Shaded relief base from U.S. Geological Survey 117 15’ 117 00’ 116 45’ 116 30’ 116 15’ 116 00’ digital elevation data, 1:24,000-scale 0 10 20 MILES 01020 KILOMETERS Scale: 1: 300,000 CALIFORNIA U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cuyamaca Water Company Partnership: New Scenes from San Diego’S Water History
    The Cuyamaca Water Company Partnership: New Scenes from San Diego’s Water History Bill Farley Considered to be one of the most influential people in San Diego, Ed Fletcher (1872-1955) spun many tales that still dominate the City’s land development and water historiography. His embellished accounts of his own role in the Cuyamaca Water Company obscure a number of colorful episodes in San Diego’s history. This article revisits Fletcher’s life and times, highlighting stories about the “Bonanza King” James A. Murray (1840-1921); the accidental naming of Lake Murray; and a yacht club at Pebble Beach paid for, albeit indirectly, by San Diego county ratepayers. Ed Fletcher, born and raised in Massachusetts, travelled to San Diego in 1888 to live with his sister when just 15 years old.1 The first job he held down was working for a produce vendor. He travelled A young Ed Fletcher and his wife Mary, c. 1895. Ed Fletcher told many tall tales about all over the county and came to know every his accomplishments in the early years of San inch of land surrounding the city. He knew Diego’s development. ©SDHC #81:10736. Bill Farley is a PhD student in government and public affairs at Virginia Commonwealth University where he studies modern day capitalists and capitalism. He is a second great-grandnephew of James A. Murray. Lauren Farley contributed to the research for this article. 181 The Journal of San Diego History where the streams ran the longest and where the land avoided winter’s frost. His optimism, persistence, and bravado—along with his local knowledge— allowed him to find work as a middleman on several important development and infrastructure projects in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • SWEETWATER AUTHORITY Strategic Plan 2012
    Sweetwater Authority STRATEGIC PLAN Reverse osmosis trains at the Richard A. Reynolds Groundwater Desalination Facility SWEETWATER AUTHORITY strategic plan 2012 Governing Board Ron Morrison, Chair Margaret Cook Welsh, Vice Chair W.D. “Bud” Pocklington Jose Preciado Maria Rubalcaba Teresa “Terry” Thomas Jess Van Deventer Management James L. Smyth, General Manager Jennifer H. Sabine, Assistant General Manager Department Heads Scott McClelland, Director of Water Quality Ron Mosher, Director of Engineering Bill Olson, Director of Distribution George Silva, Director of Information Systems Rich Stevenson, Director of Finance Dina Yorba, Director of Administrative Services PREPARED BY Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc. “Among the Stones” Photo by Frances Aquino Hilltop High School Second Place Winner 2012 High School Photo Contest SWEETWATER AUTHORITY STRATEGIC PLAN 2012 table of contents I INTRODUCTION 1 II STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS 9 III STRATEGIC ISSUES 11 IV STRATEGIC PLAN FRAMEWORK 15 V GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 21 GOAL #1 Water Quality 22 GOAL #2 System Reliability 25 GOAL #3 Financial Viability 28 GOAL #4 Customer Service 30 GOAL #5 Staff Development 31 GOAL #6 Administrative Effectiveness 33 VI PLAN IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING AND REPORTING 37 APPENDICES AVAILABLE UNDER SEPARATE COVER THE SWEETWATER RIVER DELIVERS WATER VIA THE 230-SQUARE MILE WATERSHED STRETCHING FROM THE CLEVELAND NATIONAL FOREST IN THE EAST TO THE SAN DIEGO BAY. Release of water from Loveland into Sweetwater Reservoir I. introduction OVERVIEW OF SWEETWATER history. In May 1869, the Kimball Brothers AUTHORITY Water Company began service to 35 local Sweetwater Authority (Authority) provides residents with water drawn from wells and the safe, reliable water service to approximately Sweetwater River, followed by construction 184,000 people across a 32-square mile area of the Sweetwater Dam and Reservoir in in the South Bay region of San Diego County, 1888.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4.10 – Hydrology and Water Quality
    4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality 4.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section evaluates the hydrology and water quality impacts of the proposed Plan. The information presented was compiled from multiple sources, including Project Clean Water (PCW), the County of San Diego, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), and the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). 4.10.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS HYDROLOGY Surface Hydrology Surface waters in the San Diego region include the ocean shoreline, bays, lagoons, lakes, reservoirs, playas/inundation areas/washes, streams, and rivers (Figure 4.10-1). Major rivers within the San Diego region include the Santa Margarita River, the San Luis Rey River, San Dieguito River, San Diego River, Sweetwater River, Otay River, and the Tijuana River. Major coastal waterbodies include Buena Vista Lagoon, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, Batiquitos Lagoon, San Elijo Lagoon, San Dieguito Lagoon, Los Peñasquitos Lagoon, Mission Bay, San Diego Bay, Tijuana River estuary, and the Pacific Ocean. Playas/ inundation areas/washes include areas surrounding Lake Henshaw, Lake Cuyamaca, Moreno Reservoir, and Lake Hodges as shown in Figure 4.10-1. Surface waters in the San Diego region have many uses, including but not limited to habitat for wildlife, recreation, and storage reservoirs for drinking water supply. Waters listed as impaired under CWA Section 303(d) (33 USC Section 1313[d]) are also shown in Figure 4.10-1. A description of the 303(d) list is provided in Section 4.10.2 Regulatory Setting. Watersheds and Hydrological Characteristics The San Diego region is divided into two hydrologic basins by the northwest-trending Peninsular Range.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweetwater Authority Governing Board on January 26, 2011
    FINAL WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT City of National City General Plan Update Adopted by the Sweetwater Authority Governing Board on January 26, 2011 Sweetwater Authority Prepared by Sweetwater Authority Staff City of National City General Plan Update Water Supply Assessment Sweetwater Authority 505 Garrett Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 www.sweetwater.org Sweetwater Authority Water Supply Assessment City of National City General Plan Update Table of Contents SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1 SECTION 2 - IDENTIFICATION OF THE PUBLIC WATER PROVIDER ................... 1 SECTION 3 – PREVIOUS WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENTS ................................. 2 SECTION 4 – SWEETWATER’S URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN .............. 2 SECTION 5 – SUPPLY AND DEMAND ASSESSMENT............................................ 3 5.1 Project Demand Analysis .............................................................................. 3 5.1.1 Climate...................................................................................................... 3 5.1.2 Population ................................................................................................. 4 5.1.3 Demand Assessment ................................................................................ 5 5.1.4 Demand Management Measures (Water Conservation) ........................... 8 5.2 Existing and Projected Supplies................................................................. 21 5.2.1 Local Supply ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SDC PDS RCVD 08-24-15 SPA15-002 on the Westerly Side of the Project and a Rezoning Application to Change the Land Use on the New Multi-Family Parcel from S88 to RU 22
    SECTION I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background The 653.3 acre Hansen’s Ranch is located in the approximately 30 square mile unincorporated community of Spring Valley. The Ranch is south and west of the adjacent Rancho San Diego development area and north of Sweetwater Reservoir. (See the Regional and Vicinity maps on pages 3 and 4, and the aerial photograph on page 6.) Originally the Ranch was a portion of Jamacha Rancho, an 8,880+ acre land grant to Dona Apolinaria Lorenzana in 1840. Subsequent owners subdivided and sold portions of the Ranch; the most noteworthy being George H. Neale because of his involvement with Alfred H. Isham for whom the Ranch Springs are named. The land was the site of the first resort in San Diego County; a health spa founded by Isham which predated the Hotel Del Coronado in 1887. In 1926, Fred J. Hansen purchased 1,500 acres of Jamacha Rancho, an area which includes the present Specific Plan Area. Since 1975 several large scale development proposals have been prepared for the Ranch. This planning was interrupted when in 1977 the County Board of Supervisors adopted the Valle de Oro Community Plan which set specific plan requirements to control any construction on the site. Formatted: Font: (Default) Courier New, 10 Processing was recommenced in 1978 resulting in several approvals pt, No underline, Do not check spelling or culminating in approvals by County August 1, 1990 of a specific grammar plan and other discretionary permits. Development under those approvals and implementing permits has continued and is ongoing today.
    [Show full text]
  • South Bay Historical Society Bulletin February 2016 Issue No
    South Bay Historical Society Bulletin February 2016 Issue No. 11 In This Issue New Museum Exhibit Opens . Page 1 Exhibit Contributors and Sponsors . Page 3 The Great Flood of 1916 . Page 4 Bruhlmeier’s Good Drinking Water . Page 13 Next meeting this Friday, Feb. 19 . Page 16 Memorial Park since 1993. That building was constructed in 1946 for the Chamber of Commerce, and has served over the years as a real estate office and Bill's Drive-in, but it will soon be demolished to expand the park. The Friends of the Library maintained this building for the last 20 years, but last year it had to be closed. Library Director Betty Waznis offered space inside the Civic Library, and the Friends joined with the city to construct the new Heritage Museum. The South Bay Historical Society has joined with the Friends of the Library to produce exhibits that will be rotated at least once a year. The curved wall on the outside of the exhibit space will Chula Vista Mayor Mary Salas helped Steve remain in place, featuring photographs that illustrate Schoenherr and Betty Waznis cut the ribbon on the a timeline of Chula Vista history. new exhibit in the Chula Vista Library’s Heritage In the photo above, courtesy of Steve Wood, some of Museum at 5:05 pm on January 27, 2016, exactly the crowd attending the grand opening are shown 100 years after the Otay Dam burst in 1916. The looking at the curved wall and the alcoves and exhibit marked the grand opening of the new artifact cases.
    [Show full text]