NR 2011.Indd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Arizona Forest Action Plan 2015 Status Report and Addendum
Arizona Forest Action Plan 2015 Status Report and Addendum A report on the strategic plan to address forest-related conditions, trends, threats, and opportunities as identified in the 2010 Arizona Forest Resource Assessment and Strategy. November 20, 2015 Arizona State Forestry Acknowledgements: Arizona State Forestry would like to thank the USDA Forest Service for their ongoing support of cooperative forestry and fire programs in the State of Arizona, and for specific funding to support creation of this report. We would also like to thank the many individuals and organizations who contributed to drafting the original 2010 Forest Resource Assessment and Resource Strategy (Arizona Forest Action Plan) and to the numerous organizations and individuals who provided input for this 2015 status report and addendum. Special thanks go to Arizona State Forestry staff who graciously contributed many hours to collect information and data from partner organizations – and to writing, editing, and proofreading this document. Jeff Whitney Arizona State Forester Granite Mountain Hotshots Memorial On the second anniversary of the Yarnell Hill Fire, the State of Arizona purchased 320 acres of land near the site where the 19 Granite Mountain Hotshots sacrificed their lives while battling one of the most devastating fires in Arizona’s history. This site is now the Granite Mountain Hotshots Memorial State Park. “This site will serve as a lasting memorial to the brave hotshots who gave their lives to protect their community,” said Governor Ducey. “While we can never truly repay our debt to these heroes, we can – and should – honor them every day. Arizona is proud to offer the public a space where we can pay tribute to them, their families and all of our firefighters and first responders for generations to come.” Arizona Forest Action Plan – 2015 Status Report and Addendum Background Contents The 2010 Forest Action Plan The development of Arizona’s Forest Resource Assessment and Strategy (now known as Arizona’s “Forest Action Plan”) was prompted by federal legislative requirements. -
Introduction
INTRODUCTION 1 Using this book 2 Visiting the SouthWestern United States 3 Equipment and special hazards GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK 4 Visiting Grand Canyon National Park 5 Walking in Grand Canyon National Park 6 Grand Canyon National Park: South Rim, rim-to-river trails Table of Trails South Bass Trail Hermit Trail Bright Angel Trail South Kaibab Trail Grandview Trail New Hance Trail Tanner Trail 7 Grand Canyon National Park: North Rim, rim-to-river trails Table of Trails Thunder River and Bill Hall Trails, with Deer Creek Extension North Bass Trail North Kaibab Trail Nankoweap Trail 8 Grand Canyon National Park: trans-canyon trails, North and South Rim Table of Trails Escalante Route: Tanner Canyon to New Hance Trail at Red Canyon Tonto Trail: New Hance Trail at Red Canyon to Hance Creek Tonto Trail: Hance Creek to Cottonwood Creek Tonto Trail: Cottonwood Creek to South Kaibab Trail Tonto Trail: South Kaibab Trail to Indian Garden Tonto Trail: Indian Garden to Hermit Creek Tonto Trail: Hermit Creek to Boucher Creek Tonto Trail: Boucher Creek to Bass Canyon Clear Creek Trail 9 Grand Canyon National Park: South and North Rim trails South Rim Trails Rim Trail Shoshone Point Trail North Rim Trails Cape Royal Trail Cliff Springs Trail Cape Final Trail Ken Patrick Trail Bright Angel Point Trail Transept Trail Widforss Trail Uncle Jim Trail 10 Grand Canyon National Park: long-distance routes Table of Routes Boucher Trail to Hermit Trail Loop Hermit Trail to Bright Angel Trail Loop Cross-canyon: North Kaibab Trail to Bright Angel Trail South -
KAIBAB DEER HERD MUST BE REDUCED IMMEDIATELY -- October 13,1924
U.S.DEPARTMENT OFAGRICULTURE Office of the Secretary , Pra serviq ” _, RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION, MONDAYMORNING, OCTOBER13, 19+: -9 KAIBAB DEER HERD MUST BE REDUCEDIXMEDIATELY Immediate reduction of the deer herd on the Kaibab National Forest in northern Arizona is strongly urged by the special committee appointed by the Secretary of Agriculture to study and report on the conditions existing on the Grand Canyon Game Preserve, announces the Forest Service, United States Depart- ment of Agricu&are. ! The special committee is composed of John B. Burnham, chairman, repre- senting the American Game Protective Association; Heyward Cutting, of tho Boone and Crockett Club; T. Gilbert Pearson,, of the Audubon Society and the National Parks Association; and T. W. Tomlinson, of the American National Livestock Association. This ccmmittee has made its report to the Secretary of Agriculture following a personal inspection of the Kaibab Plateau on which the Grand Canyon &me Preserve was estabZ.shed in 1906 by President Roosevelt. This area also forms part of the Kaibab Nakional Forest and is under the supervision Of the Forest Servi&. _ . , Upwards of 30,000 head of mule deer are now on the Kaibab Plateau, according to the report of the committee. This is fully twice as many deer as the vegetation can support and the entire herd is in imdnent danger of extinction through starvation unless reduced to a safety number. Moreover, the condition of That forage is still to be found on the ' arsa is far below nornal and several years will be required to grow new forage crops before the region can support more than 15,009 head of deer'in addition to the scattering amal 1 herds of domestic livest.ock owned by settlers living in and around the Kaibab Forest. -
Coconino National Forest Draft Land Management Plan – February 2011 Iii
United States Coconino National Department of Agriculture Forest Forest Draft Land Service Southwestern Region Management Plan February 2011 Notes for reviewers: • This document is an initial draft of the Coconino National Forest’s revised land management plan. It was made available for public review in February 2011. • Language highlighted in gray is incomplete or needs further attention. Draft Revised Land Management Plan Prepared for: The Coconino National Forest 1824 S. Thompson St. Flagstaff, AZ 86001 and USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region 333 Broadway SE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 Submitted by: Plan Revision Team Coconino National Forest Contents Draft Revised Land Management Plan ........... i Chapter 1. Background ................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Land Management Plan .................................................................................... 1 Summary of the Analysis of the Management Situation ........................................................... 1 Plan Content .............................................................................................................................. 2 Plan Decisions ..................................................................................................................... 2 Other Content ..................................................................................................................... -
HHE Report No. HETA-99-0321-2873, U.S
NIOSH HEALTH HAZARD EVALUATION REPORT: HETA #99-0321-2873 U.S. Department of the Interior Grand Canyon National Park Grand Canyon, Arizona April 2002 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health PREFACE The Hazard Evaluations and Technical Assistance Branch (HETAB) of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) conducts field investigations of possible health hazards in the workplace. These investigations are conducted under the authority of Section 20(a)(6) of the Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. 669(a)(6) which authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services, following a written request from any employer or authorized representative of employees, to determine whether any substance normally found in the place of employment has potentially toxic effects in such concentrations as used or found. HETAB also provides, upon request, technical and consultative assistance to Federal, State, and local agencies; labor; industry; and other groups or individuals to control occupational health hazards and to prevent related trauma and disease. Mention of company names or products does not constitute endorsement by NIOSH. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND AVAILABILITY OF REPORT This report was prepared by Ann Krake, Joel McCullough, and Brad King of HETAB, Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations and Field Studies (DSHEFS). Field assistance was provided by Loren Tapp. Desktop publishing was performed by David Butler. Review and preparation for printing were performed by Penny Arthur. The authors would like to thank Sergeant G. Douglas Fritts, United States Air Force, for his loan of the core body temperature monitors and Ms. -
Historical Stand-Replacing Fire in Upper Montane Forests of the Madrean Sky Islands and Mogollon Plateau, Southwestern USA
Fire Ecology Volume 7, Issue 3, 2011 Margolis et al.: Historical Stand-Replacing Fire doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0703088 Page 88 RESEARCH ARTICLE HISTORICAL STAND-REPLACING FIRE IN UPPER MONTANE FORESTS OF THE MADREAN SKY ISLANDS AND MOGOLLON PLATEAU, SOUTHWESTERN USA Ellis Q. Margolis1*, Thomas W. Swetnam1, and Craig D. Allen2 1University of Arizona Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, 105 W. Stadium, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 2US Geological Survey Jemez Mountains Field Station, HCR 1, Box 1, Number 15, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544, USA *Corresponding author: Tel.: 001-520-626-2733; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The recent occurrence of large fires with a substantial stand-replacing component in the southwestern United States (e.g., Cerro Grande, 2000; Rodeo-Chedeski, 2002; Aspen, 2003; Horseshoe 2, Las Conchas, and Wallow, 2011) has raised questions about the his- torical role of stand-replacing fire in the region. We reconstructed fire dates and stand-re- placing fire patch sizes using four lines of tree-ring evidence at four upper montane forest sites (>2600 m) in the Madrean Sky Islands and Mogollon Plateau of Arizona and New Mexico, USA. The four lines of tree-ring evidence include: (1) quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) and spruce-fir age structure, (2) conifer death dates, (3) traumatic resin ducts and ring-width changes, and (4) conifer fire scars. Pre-1905 fire regimes in the upper montane forest sites were variable, with drier, south-facing portions of some sites record- ing frequent, low-severity fire (mean fire interval of all fires ranging from 5 yr to 11 yr among sites), others burning with stand-replacing severity, and others with no evidence of fire for >300 yr. -
Grand Canyon March 18 – 22, 2004
Grand Canyon March 18 – 22, 2004 Jeff and I left the Fruita-4 place at about 8 AM and tooled west on I-70 to exit 202 at UT-128 near Cisco, Utah. We drove south on UT-128 through the Colorado River canyons to US-191, just north of Moab. We turned south and drove through Moab on US-191 to US-163, past Bluff, Utah. US-163 veers southwest through Monument Valley into Arizona and the little town of Keyenta. At Keyenta we took US-160 west to US-89, then south to AZ-64. We drove west past the fairly spectacular canyons of the Little Colorado River and into the east entrance to Grand Canyon National Park. Jeff had a Parks Pass so we saved $20 and got in for free. Entry included the park information paper, The Guide, which included a park map that was especially detailed around the main tourist center: Grand Canyon Village. Near the village was our pre-hike destination, the Backcountry Office. We stopped at the office and got an update on the required shuttle to the trailhead. We read in The Guide that mule rides into the canyon would not begin until May 23, after we were done with our hike. Satisfied that we had the situation under control we skeedaddled on outta there on US-180, south to I-40 and Williams, Arizona. Jeff had tried his cell phone quite a few times on the trip from Fruita, but no signal. Finally the signal was strong enough in Williams. Jeff noted that Kent had called and returned the call. -
Introduction to Backcountry Hiking
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Grand Canyon National Park Grand Canyon, Arizona Hiking Into Grand Canyon Plan Ahead limits, and avoid spontaneity—Grand Canyon is an extreme Whether a day or overnight trip, hiking into Grand Canyon on environment and overexertion affects everybody at some point. the Bright Angel, North Kaibab, or South Kaibab trails gives an unparalleled experience that changes your perspective. Stay together, follow your plan, and know where you can call 911 with emergencies. Turning around may be your best decision. Knowledge, preparation, and a good plan are your keys to For information about Leave No Trace strategies, hiking tips, success. Be honest about your health and fitness, know your closures, roads, trails, and permits, visit go.nps.gov/grca- backcountry. Warning While Hiking BALANCE FOOD AND WATER Hiking to the river and back in one • Do not force fluids. Drink water when day is not recommended due to you are thirsty, and stop when you are long distance, extreme temperature quenched. Over-hydration may lead to a changes, and an approximately 5,000- life-threatening electrolyte disorder called foot (1,500 m) elevation change each hyponatremia. way. RESTORE YOUR ENERGY If you think you have the fitness and • Eat double your normal intake of expertise to attempt this extremely carbohydrates and salty foods. Calories strenuous hike, please seek the advice play an important role in regulating body of a park ranger at the Backcountry temperature, and hiking suppresses your Information Center. appetite. TAKE CARE OF YOUR BODY Know how to rescue yourself. -
North Kaibab Trail
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Grand Canyon Grand Canyon National Park Arizona North Kaibab Trail The North Kaibab Trail is the least visited but most difficult of the three maintained trails at Grand Canyon National Park. Almost a thousand feet higher at the trailhead than South Rim trails, hikers on the North Kaibab Trail pass through every ecosystem to be found between Canada and Mexico. At the rim, hikers will glimpse the vast maw of Bright Angel Canyon through fir trees and aspen, ferns and wildflowers. The trail as it descends through the Redwall Limestone is blasted directly into the cliff, "literally hewn from solid rock in half-tunnel sections." Farther down, the ecology progresses so that hikers look up at the surrounding canyon walls through a blend of riparian and desert vegetation. Along the way, Roaring Springs and Ribbon Falls both offer rewarding side trips that are wonderfully juxtaposed to the often hot conditions of the main trail. Built throughout the 1920s to match the quality and grade of the South Kaibab Trail, the present-day North Kaibab Trail replaced an older route infamous for crossing Bright Angel Creek 94 times (the present-day trail crosses only 6 times). Even though it is masterfully constructed and is a maintained trail, don't be deceived by the apparent ease and convenience of hiking it; from beginning to end, the North Kaibab Trail has its challenges. Locations/Elevations Mileages North Kaibab trailhead (8241 ft / 2512 m) to Supai Tunnel (6800 ft / 2073 m): 1.7 mi ( 2.5 km) Supai -
S 2
13 00 +J ^ .S 2 *c3 -3 - '£ w 2 S PQ <$ H Grand Canyon hiking is the reverse of moun tain climbing. First the descent, then the climb out, when one is tired — (exhausted). When you hike down into Grand Canyon you are entering a desert area where shade and water are scarce and where summer temperatures often exceed 41 C (105 F) and drop below freezing in winter. PLAN AHEAD! Allow at least 3 km (2 mi) per hour to descend and 21/2 km MVimi) per hour to ascend. ARE WE THERE YET ? ? DISTANCES: FROM BRIGHT ANGEL TRAILHEAD TO: Indian Gardens 7.4 km (4.6 mi) Colorado River 12.5 km (7.8 mi) Bright Angel Camp 14.9 km (9.3 mi) FROM SOUTH KAIBAB TRAILHEAD TO: Cedar Ridge 2.4 km (1.5 mi) Tonto Trail Junct. 7.1 km (4.4 mi) Bright Angel Camp 10.8 km (6.4 mi) FROM BRIGHT ANGEL CAMP AT RIVER TO: Ribbon Falls 9.3 km ( 5.8 mi) Cottonwood 11.7 km ( 7.3 mi) Roaring Springs 15.3 km ( 9.5 mi) North KaibabTrailhead 22.8 km (14.2 mi) FROM INDIAN GARDENS CAMP TO: Bright Angel Camp 7.5 km (4.7 mi) Plateau Point 2.4 km (1.5 mi) S. Kaibab Trail 6.6 km (4.1 mi) Junct. via Tonto Trail ELEVATIONS Bright Angel Lodge, South Rim 2091M (6860 ft) Yaki Point 2213M (7260 ft) Indian Gardens 1160M (3800 ft) Plateau Point 1150M (3760 ft) Bright Angel Camp 730M (2400 ft) Cottonwood 1220M (4000 ft) Roaring Springs 1580M (5200 ft) N. -
1988 Backcountry Management Plan
Backcountry Management Plan September 1988 Grand Canyon National Park Arizona National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior (this version of the Backcountry Management Plan was reformatted in April 2000) Recommended by: Richard Marks, Superintendent, Grand Canyon National Park, 8/8/88 Approved by: Stanley T Albright, Regional Director Western Region, 8/9/88 2 GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK 1988 BACKCOUNTRY MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents A. Introduction __________________________________________________________________ 4 B. Goals ________________________________________________________________________ 4 C. Legislation and NPS Policy ______________________________________________________ 5 D. Backcountry Zoning and Use Areas _______________________________________________ 6 E. Reservation and Permit System __________________________________________________ 6 F. Visitor Use Limits ______________________________________________________________7 G.Use Limit Explanations for Selected Use Areas _____________________________________ 8 H.Visitor Activity Restrictions _____________________________________________________ 9 I. Information, Education and Enforcement_________________________________________ 13 J. Resource Protection, Monitoring, and Research ___________________________________ 14 K. Plan Review and Update _______________________________________________________15 Appendix A Backcountry Zoning and Use Limits __________________________________ 16 Appendix B Backcountry Reservation and Permit System __________________________ 20 -
Grand Canyon
U.S. Department of the Interior Geologic Investigations Series I–2688 14 Version 1.0 4 U.S. Geological Survey 167.5 1 BIG SPRINGS CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS LIST OF MAP UNITS 4 Pt Ph Pamphlet accompanies map .5 Ph SURFICIAL DEPOSITS Pk SURFICIAL DEPOSITS SUPAI MONOCLINE Pk Qr Holocene Qr Colorado River gravel deposits (Holocene) Qsb FAULT CRAZY JUG Pt Qtg Qa Qt Ql Pk Pt Ph MONOCLINE MONOCLINE 18 QUATERNARY Geologic Map of the Pleistocene Qtg Terrace gravel deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene) Pc Pk Pe 103.5 14 Qa Alluvial deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene) Pt Pc VOLCANIC ROCKS 45.5 SINYALA Qti Qi TAPEATS FAULT 7 Qhp Qsp Qt Travertine deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene) Grand Canyon ၧ DE MOTTE FAULT Pc Qtp M u Pt Pleistocene QUATERNARY Pc Qp Pe Qtb Qhb Qsb Ql Landslide deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene) Qsb 1 Qhp Ph 7 BIG SPRINGS FAULT ′ × ′ 2 VOLCANIC DEPOSITS Dtb Pk PALEOZOIC SEDIMENTARY ROCKS 30 60 Quadrangle, Mr Pc 61 Quaternary basalts (Pleistocene) Unconformity Qsp 49 Pk 6 MUAV FAULT Qhb Pt Lower Tuckup Canyon Basalt (Pleistocene) ၣm TRIASSIC 12 Triassic Qsb Ph Pk Mr Qti Intrusive dikes Coconino and Mohave Counties, Pe 4.5 7 Unconformity 2 3 Pc Qtp Pyroclastic deposits Mr 0.5 1.5 Mၧu EAST KAIBAB MONOCLINE Pk 24.5 Ph 1 222 Qtb Basalt flow Northwestern Arizona FISHTAIL FAULT 1.5 Pt Unconformity Dtb Pc Basalt of Hancock Knolls (Pleistocene) Pe Pe Mၧu Mr Pc Pk Pk Pk NOBLE Pt Qhp Qhb 1 Mၧu Pyroclastic deposits Qhp 5 Pe Pt FAULT Pc Ms 12 Pc 12 10.5 Lower Qhb Basalt flows 1 9 1 0.5 PERMIAN By George H.