Western Juniper Woodlands of the Pacific Northwest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Western Juniper Woodlands of the Pacific Northwest Western Juniper Woodlands (of the Pacific Northwest) Science Assessment October 6, 1994 Lee E. Eddleman Professor, Rangeland Resources Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon Patricia M. Miller Assistant Professor Courtesy Rangeland Resources Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon Richard F. Miller Professor, Rangeland Resources Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center Burns, Oregon Patricia L. Dysart Graduate Research Assistant Rangeland Resources Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................... i WESTERN JUNIPER (Juniperus occidentalis Hook. ssp. occidentalis) WOODLANDS. ................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................ 1 Current Status.............................................. 2 Distribution of Western Juniper............................ 2 Holocene Changes in Western Juniper Woodlands ................. 4 Introduction ........................................... 4 Prehistoric Expansion of Juniper .......................... 4 Historic Expansion of Juniper ............................. 6 Conclusions .......................................... 9 Biology of Western Juniper.................................... 11 Physiological Ecology of Western Juniper and Associated Species ...................................... 17 Introduction ........................................... 17 Western Juniper — Patterns in Biomass Allocation............ 17 Western Juniper — Allocation Patterns of Carbon and Minerals . 18 Western Juniper — Biomass and Leaf Area Estimators ......... 20 Western Juniper — Leaf Morphology of Adult Foliage .......... 26 Western Juniper — Seasonal Ring Growth .................. 26 Western Juniper — Physiological Ecology .................. 27 Western Juniper — Measured and simulated leaf conductance and transpiration .................................... 33 Western Juniper — Modeling Leaf Conductance and Transpiration........................................ 34 Gray Rabbitbrush ...................................... 35 Green Rabbitbrush ..................................... 38 Sandberg Bluegrass .................................... 38 Idaho Fescue ......................................... 40 Ecology of Western Juniper Woodlands .......................... 41 Geology and Soils ...................................... 41 Climate .............................................. 47 Woodland Maturity ..................................... 47 Plant Associations and Communities ....................... 48 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd.) Page Range Sites ........................................... 51 Plant Species ......................................... 52 Woodland Dynamics .................................... 55 Interactions and Succession ......................... 55 Fire Influences .................................... 57 Grazing Influences ................................. 60 Microbiotic Soil Crusts .................................. 62 Introduction ....................................... 62 Effects of Disturbance on Microbiotic Crusts ............. 63 Crust Influence on Soil Properties and Seedling Establishment ........................... 67 Spatial Heterogeneity Within Microbiotic Crusts .......... 70 Hydrologic Cycle ............................................ 73 Interception........................................... 73 Infiltration ............................................ 75 Runoff, Erosion, and Sedimentation ........................ 78 Wildlife in Western Juniper Woodlands .......................... 83 Large Herbivores ...................................... 83 Birds ................................................ 88 Small Mammals........................................ 89 Amphibians and Reptiles ................................ 90 Conclusions .......................................... 90 Conversion of Western Juniper Woodlands ....................... 91 Grazing Management of Western Juniper Woodlands ............... 98 Grazing Young Woodlands ............................... 99 Grazing Management of Young Closed Western Juniper Woodlands on Shallow Soils ............. 100 Rationale ........................................ 100 Grazing Young Western Juniper Woodlands on Deep Soils ..... 103 Grazing Management Following Western Juniper Control ....... 105 Grazing Management on Sites Susceptible to Western Juniper Encroachment and Dominance ................... 107 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................. 108 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Relationships between tree components (y) and tree age (x) .......... 19 2 Dimensions of live junipers on Horse Ridge: n' = measured and n = the 10 destructively analyzed ............................ 22 3 Regression equations for estimating component biomass, volume, surface area, and biomass treatment for western juniper with basal circumference (cm) as the independent variable. The first 2 12 follow the form ln(Y) = A + B*ln(X) with variances (Sy,x ) in logarithmic units. The last four are linear, untransformed equations with variances in arithmetic units ....................... 23 4 Average dimensions of western juniper estimated by double sampling ............................................. 24 5 Regression equations, standard error of estimate (Sy,x) and correlation coefficients for estimating leaf biomass and leaf area ....... 25 6 Daily total CO2 assimilated in grams per tree and daily water transpired in liters per tree, during a full sun day, for the average sized large-adult western juniper, 4.5 m tall with a basal circumference of 66 + 4 cm (Miller et al. 1992) ................ 29 7 Comparison of Juvenile and large adults classes of Chrysothamnus nauseosus for the Tintic, Utah, population, June 1989, presented as mean ± SD: pre-dawn xylem pressure 5 5 potential ( pd), midday xylem pressure potential ( md), photosynthesis (Amax ), stomatal conductance to water vapour (gmax ), instantaneous ratio of internal to ambient CO2 concentration (cia /c ), transpiration (E), instantaneous A/E, carbon isotope discrimination ( ), integrated cia /c estimated from , integrated A/E estimated from and the leaf-to-air vapour pressure deficit, leaf nitrogen, potential photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (PPNUE), and plant height. All differences between juvenile and large adult classes were significantly different (P<0.05) based on a two-tailed Student's t-test comparison of juveniles and adults, with the exception of the instantaneous cia /c which was based on a one-tailed Student's t-test since the direction of the difference was predicted. Sample sizes ranged from 18 to 20 for the juvenile class, and from 19 to 20 for the large adult class ....................................... 37 LIST OF TABLES (Cont'd.) Table Page 8 Some physical and chemical characteristics of western juniper woodland soils .............................................. 43 9 Relationship of grazed and ungrazed conditions to cover of crusts, grasses, and bare soil ........................... 66 10 Permeability, infiltration and sediment production associated with microbiotic crusts on the Colorado Plateau ........... 68 11 Watershed and hillslope-scale hydrologic studies in pinyon-juniper environments................................... 80 12 List of wildlife species observed in western juniper communities (from Puchy and Marshal 1993) ................................. 84 13 Aboveground biomass production response to western juniper removal in central Oregon in 1984 (Vaitkus 1986). Values are for the second year and only for trees with >5 m crown diameter .......... 93 14 Aboveground biomass production response to western juniper removal in central Oregon in 1983 and 1984. Values are weight for percent of area in each zone (sub-canopy and interspace) and include all size classes of trees ............................. 93 15 Estimated biomass and mineral content of a western juniper tree 11 meters (36 ft) tall with a basal diameter of 44 cm (17.3 in) (from Larsen 1993, Kramer 1990, and Miller et al. 1990) ...... 95 i SCIENCE ASSESSMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WESTERN JUNIPER (Juniperus occidentalis Hook. ssp. occidentalis) WOODLANDS Distribution of Western Juniper (Juniperus occidentalis ssp. occidentalis) woodlands is across a broad variety of vegetation types, soils, landscapes and moisture regimes. Area occupied by western juniper woodlands in the Pacific Northwest is nearly 4 million acres (about 1.6 million ha). Over 2.3 million acres of woodland are in Oregon with approximately 10% of the area in old woodlands. Nearly 90% of the area in Oregon is composed of young woodlands with trees less than 150 years old. Data and observation indicate the species continues to expand its range into new areas. Prehistoric Expansion and retraction of western juniper took place over long time periods. Data indicate that where it did occur, its density was less than that at present. Historic Expansion of western juniper woodlands has originated from open, sparse and savannah-like stands of old juniper trees many of which are today 400 to 600 years of age or even older. Many of these stands were growing on topographic situations where fire would have been restricted. Factors which may have influenced the rapid expansion were a combination of mild winters with greater precipitation, reduced fire frequency and livestock grazing that contributed to increases in big sagebrush reduced production of grasses. Development of present day woodlands occurred under a different combination
Recommended publications
  • Western Juniper Woodlands of the Pacific Northwest
    Western Juniper Woodlands (of the Pacific Northwest) Science Assessment October 6, 1994 Lee E. Eddleman Professor, Rangeland Resources Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon Patricia M. Miller Assistant Professor Courtesy Rangeland Resources Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon Richard F. Miller Professor, Rangeland Resources Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center Burns, Oregon Patricia L. Dysart Graduate Research Assistant Rangeland Resources Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................... i WESTERN JUNIPER (Juniperus occidentalis Hook. ssp. occidentalis) WOODLANDS. ................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................ 1 Current Status.............................................. 2 Distribution of Western Juniper............................ 2 Holocene Changes in Western Juniper Woodlands ................. 4 Introduction ........................................... 4 Prehistoric Expansion of Juniper .......................... 4 Historic Expansion of Juniper ............................. 6 Conclusions .......................................... 9 Biology of Western Juniper.................................... 11 Physiological Ecology of Western Juniper and Associated Species ...................................... 17 Introduction ........................................... 17 Western Juniper — Patterns in Biomass Allocation............ 17 Western Juniper — Allocation Patterns of Carbon and
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Vii Table of Contents
    CHAPTER VII TABLE OF CONTENTS VII. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES CITED........................................................................1 Appendix 1: Description of Vegetation Databases......................................................................1 Appendix 2: Suggested Stocking Levels......................................................................................8 Appendix 3: Known Plants of the Desolation Watershed.........................................................15 Literature Cited............................................................................................................................25 CHAPTER VII - APPENDICES & REFERENCES - DESOLATION ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS i VII. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES CITED Appendix 1: Description of Vegetation Databases Vegetation data for the Desolation ecosystem analysis was stored in three different databases. This document serves as a data dictionary for the existing vegetation, historical vegetation, and potential natural vegetation databases, as described below: • Interpretation of aerial photography acquired in 1995, 1996, and 1997 was used to characterize existing (current) conditions. The 1996 and 1997 photography was obtained after cessation of the Bull and Summit wildfires in order to characterize post-fire conditions. The database name is: 97veg. • Interpretation of late-1930s and early-1940s photography was used to characterize historical conditions. The database name is: 39veg. • The potential natural vegetation was determined for each polygon in the analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Pearrygin Lake State Park
    Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of Pearrygin Lake State Park Pacific Biodiversity Institute 2 Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of Pearrygin Lake State Park Dana Visalli [email protected] Hans M. Smith IV [email protected] Peter H. Morrison [email protected] December 2006 Pacific Biodiversity Institute P.O. Box 298 Winthrop, Washington 98862 509-996-2490 Recommended Citation Visalli, D, H.M. Smith, IV, and P.H. Morrison. 2006. Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of Pearrygin Lake State Park. Pacific Biodiversity Institute, Winthrop, Washington. 132 p. Acknowledgements The photographs in this report are by Dana Visalli, Hans Smith and Peter Morrison. Scott Heller, a conservation science intern at Pacific Biodiversity Institute assisted with both field surveys and data entry. Juliet Rhodes also assisted with field surveys, completed the data entry and worked on checking data integrity. Project Funding This project was funded by the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission and completed under a work trade agreement with Lyra Biological 3 Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 5 Vegetation Communities .................................................................................................. 6 Methods............................................................................................................................................ 6 Results.............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant List Whatcom County Whatcom County. Whatcom County, WA
    Vascular Plant List Whatcom County Whatcom County. Whatcom County, WA. List covers plants found in Whatcom County. Combination of plant lists of areas within Whatcom County, made by various observers over several years, with numerous additions by Jim Duemmel. Plants collected in Whatcom County found in the UW and WSU herbariums have been added to the list. 1175 spp., 223 introduced. Prepared by Don Knoke 2004. These lists represent the work of different WNPS members over the years. Their accuracy has not been verified by the Washington Native Plant Society. We offer these lists to individuals as a tool to enhance the enjoyment and study of native plants. * - Introduced Scientific Name Common Name Family Name Abies amabilis Pacific silver fir Pinaceae Abies grandis Grand fir Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Sub-alpine fir Pinaceae Abies procera Noble fir Pinaceae Acer circinatum Vine maple Aceraceae Acer glabrum Douglas maple Aceraceae Acer macrophyllum Big-leaf maple Aceraceae Achillea millefolium Yarrow Asteraceae Achlys triphylla Vanilla leaf Berberidaceae Aconitum columbianum Monkshood Ranunculaceae Actaea rubra Baneberry Ranunculaceae Adenocaulon bicolor Pathfinder Asteraceae Adiantum pedatum Maidenhair fern Polypodiaceae Agoseris aurantiaca Orange agoseris Asteraceae Agoseris glauca Mountain agoseris Asteraceae Agropyron caninum Bearded wheatgrass Poaceae Agropyron repens* Quack grass Poaceae Agropyron spicatum Blue-bunch wheatgrass Poaceae Agrostemma githago* Common corncockle Caryophyllaceae Agrostis alba* Red top Poaceae Agrostis exarata*
    [Show full text]
  • Tropaeolum Majus L.)
    STUDIES ON A RING SPOT VIRUS OP IX)UBIE TROPAEOLUl^ (TROPAEOLUM MAJUS L.) By LlAiiENDRA DEO MISHRA A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Science, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh (U.P.) for the degree of DOCTOR OP PHILOSOPHY IN BOTANY 1977 868TX •uJ"--^ I/•-;;!•)••'• ,»•*, • •- • \ . •• • . • . •>' In my frail canoe I struggle*^d cross the sea of desire, and forget that I too am plaj'-ing a game. From 'The Crescent Hoon' by Rabindranath Tagore THESIS SECTION a^^S Abstract -v\ STUDIES ON A RING SPOT VIRUS OF DOUBLE TROPAEOLUM (TROPAEOLUM MAJUS L.) Double tropaeolum plants (Tropaeoliim ma .jus L.)j exhibiting abnormal flora morphology leading to complete antholysis and suppression of sexual morphogenesis, a^e found to be invariably infected by a virus showing chlorotic and necrotic rings, mottling, curling and puckering of their leaves and colour breaking of flowers. The virus is sap-inoculable when mixed with celite and NagSOg and is transmitted by aphids (Aphis gossypii G-lov., A. craccivora Koch, and Myzus persicae Sulz.) from tropaeolum. Prom tobacco, the virus is not transmitted by aphids but readily through soil. There is strong evidence of its being transmitted by nematode (Xiphinema ameg.icaiium Cobb.). The thermal-inactivation-point of the virus lies between 60 and 62°G, -4 -3 dilution end-point 10 and 15 x 10 , longevity i^ vitro between 48 and 75 hrs at 19-27°C and between 168 and 240 hrs at 8-10°C. The infectivity is maximum at pH 6.0. Preeze-dried leaves when kept 4-7°C do not loose their infectivity upto 11 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Artemisia Borealis Var. Wormskioldii, Miller Island, Washington
    NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM HERITAGE NATURAL Wormskiold’s northern wormwood (Artemisia borealis var. wormskioldii) Miller Island Conservation Plan WASHINGTON WASHINGTON Prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 1 Prepared by Joseph Arnett September 20, 2010 Natural Heritage Report 2010-03 Wormskiold’s Northern Wormwood (Artemisia borealis var. wormskioldii) Miller Island Conservation Plan September 20, 2010 Prepared for The US Fish and Wildlife Service Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office Through Section 6 funding, Region 1 Project 3E2, Segment 51 by Joseph Arnett Washington Natural Heritage Program Washington Department of Natural Resources PO Box 47014 Olympia, WA 98504-7014 ii Acknowledgements Many thanks to U.S. Forest Service staff who assisted with monitoring, including Robyn Beck, Robin Dobson, and Chuti Fiedler, and especially to Cathy Flick for all her help with logistics. Many volunteers also participated in the monitoring over the years; without their help the work would have been less successful and much less enjoyable: Nancy Allen, Kelly Amsberry, Robin Beck, Debi Budnick, Melissa Carr, Char Corkran, Kristin Currin, Rebecca Currin, Elizabeth Daniel, Kim Garner, Alison Henderson, Jurgen Hess, Susan Hess, Drew Merritt, Andrea Raven, Jamie Sheahan, Krista Thie, Jennifer Wade, Karen Whitlock, Carolyn Wright, and Sara Wu. The RareCare Program from the University of Washington provided training for many of the volunteers. Captain Jack LeFond, of Young’s Fishing Service, has transported us to the island and brought us back, and made our trips enjoyable as well as safe. Special thanks to Katie Birkhauser for her help revising the monitoring methodology in 2006. This work has been conducted with logistical support from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • From Cacti to Carnivores: Improved Phylotranscriptomic Sampling And
    Article Type: Special Issue Article RESEARCH ARTICLE INVITED SPECIAL ARTICLE For the Special Issue: Using and Navigating the Plant Tree of Life Short Title: Walker et al.—Phylotranscriptomic analysis of Caryophyllales From cacti to carnivores: Improved phylotranscriptomic sampling and hierarchical homology inference provide further insight into the evolution of Caryophyllales Joseph F. Walker1,13, Ya Yang2, Tao Feng3, Alfonso Timoneda3, Jessica Mikenas4,5, Vera Hutchison4, Caroline Edwards4, Ning Wang1, Sonia Ahluwalia1, Julia Olivieri4,6, Nathanael Walker-Hale7, Lucas C. Majure8, Raúl Puente8, Gudrun Kadereit9,10, Maximilian Lauterbach9,10, Urs Eggli11, Hilda Flores-Olvera12, Helga Ochoterena12, Samuel F. Brockington3, Michael J. Moore,4 and Stephen A. Smith1,13 Manuscript received 13 October 2017; revision accepted 4 January 2018. 1 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048 USA 2 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1445 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA 3 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK 4 Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Science Center K111, 119 Woodland Street, Oberlin, OH 44074-1097 USA 5 Current address: USGS Canyonlands Research Station, Southwest Biological Science Center, 2290 S West Resource Blvd, Moab, UT 84532 USA 6 Institute of Computational and Mathematical Engineering (ICME), Stanford University, 475 Author Manuscript Via Ortega, Suite B060, Stanford, CA, 94305-4042 USA This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.
    [Show full text]
  • ICBEMP Analysis of Vascular Plants
    APPENDIX 1 Range Maps for Species of Concern APPENDIX 2 List of Species Conservation Reports APPENDIX 3 Rare Species Habitat Group Analysis APPENDIX 4 Rare Plant Communities APPENDIX 5 Plants of Cultural Importance APPENDIX 6 Research, Development, and Applications Database APPENDIX 7 Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the Interior Columbia River Basin 122 APPENDIX 1 Range Maps for Species of Conservation Concern These range maps were compiled from data from State Heritage Programs in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, and Nevada. This information represents what was known at the end of the 1994 field season. These maps may not represent the most recent information on distribution and range for these taxa but it does illustrate geographic distribution across the assessment area. For many of these species, this is the first time information has been compiled on this scale. For the continued viability of many of these taxa, it is imperative that we begin to manage for them across their range and across administrative boundaries. Of the 173 taxa analyzed, there are maps for 153 taxa. For those taxa that were not tracked by heritage programs, we were not able to generate range maps. (Antmnnrin aromatica) ( ,a-’(,. .e-~pi~] i----j \ T--- d-,/‘-- L-J?.,: . ey SAP?E%. %!?:,KnC,$ESS -,,-a-c--- --y-- I -&zII~ County Boundaries w1. ~~~~ State Boundaries <ii&-----\ \m;qw,er Columbia River Basin .---__ ,$ 4 i- +--pa ‘,,, ;[- ;-J-k, Assessment Area 1 /./ .*#a , --% C-p ,, , Suecies Locations ‘V 7 ‘\ I, !. / :L __---_- r--j -.---.- Columbia River Basin s-5: ts I, ,e: I’ 7 j ;\ ‘-3 “.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants
    Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants June 1, 2011 By Scott Mincemoyer Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT This checklist of Montana vascular plants is organized by Division, Class and Family. Species are listed alphabetically within this hierarchy. Synonyms, if any, are listed below each species and are slightly indented from the main species list. The list is generally composed of species which have been documented in the state and are vouchered by a specimen collection deposited at a recognized herbaria. Additionally, some species are included on the list based on their presence in the state being reported in published and unpublished botanical literature or through data submitted to MTNHP. The checklist is made possible by the contributions of numerous botanists, natural resource professionals and plant enthusiasts throughout Montana’s history. Recent work by Peter Lesica on a revised Flora of Montana (Lesica 2011) has been invaluable for compiling this checklist as has Lavin and Seibert’s “Grasses of Montana” (2011). Additionally, published volumes of the Flora of North America (FNA 1993+) have also proved very beneficial during this process. The taxonomy and nomenclature used in this checklist relies heavily on these previously mentioned resources, but does not strictly follow anyone of them. The Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants can be viewed or downloaded from the Montana Natural Heritage Program’s website at: http://mtnhp.org/plants/default.asp This publication will be updated periodically with more frequent revisions anticipated initially due to the need for further review of the taxonomy and nomenclature of particular taxonomic groups (e.g. Arabis s.l ., Crataegus , Physaria ) and the need to clarify the presence or absence in the state of some species.
    [Show full text]
  • National Park Service U.S
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Vascular Plant Inventory of North Cascades National Park Service Complex Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCCN/NRTR—2010/369 ON THE COVER Volunteers collect specimens near Easy Pass, North Cascades National Park, August 2003. Photograph courtesy of North Cascades National Park Service Complex. Vascular Plant Inventory of North Cascades National Park Service Complex Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCCN/NRTR—2010/369 Mignonne M. Bivin North Cascades National Park Service Complex 7280 Ranger Station Road Marblemount, WA 98267 Regina M. Rochefort North Cascades National Park Service Complex 810 State Route 20 Sedro Woolley, WA 98284 September 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants
    Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e38687 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e38687 Data Paper Biota from the coastal wetlands of Praia da Vitória (Terceira, Azores, Portugal): Part 4 – Vascular plants Rui B. Elias‡, Mariana R. Brito§, César M.M. Pimentel§, Elisabete C. Nogueira§, Paulo A. Borges‡ ‡ CE3C – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes/Azorean Biodiversity Group and Universidade dos Açores - Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e do Ambiente, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal § LIFE CWR – LIFE project “Ecological Restoration and Conservation of Praia da Vitória Coastal Wet Green Infrastructures”, Praia da Vitória, Portugal Corresponding author: Rui B. Elias ([email protected]) Academic editor: Yasen Mutafchiev Received: 31 Jul 2019 | Accepted: 13 Sep 2019 | Published: 18 Oct 2019 Citation: Elias RB, Brito MR, Pimentel CM.M, Nogueira EC, Borges PA (2019) Biota from the coastal wetlands of Praia da Vitória (Terceira, Azores, Portugal): Part 4 – Vascular plants. Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e38687. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e38687 Abstract Background The data presented here come from field observations, carried out between 2014 and 2017, as part of a LIFE research project aiming to preserve and restore three coastal wetlands of Praia da Vitória (Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal) (LIFE-CWR). A total of 23 vascular plant species surveys were carried out in three sites: one for each semester in Paul da Praia da Vitória (PPV) and Paul da Pedreira do Cabo da Praia (PPCP); one for each semester (except in 2014) in Paul do Belo Jardim (PBJ). The main objectives were to determine the plant richness of the three sites and to monitor yearly variation on species composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Lomatium Tarantuloides (Apiaceae), a New Narrowly Endemic Species from Northeast Oregon
    Darrach, M.E. and C.E. Hinchliff. 2014. Lomatium tarantuloides (Apiaceae), a new narrowly endemic species from northeast Oregon. Phytoneuron 2014-27: 1–8. Published 18 February 2014. ISSN 2153 733X LOMATIUM TARANTULOIDES (APIACEAE), A NEW NARROWLY ENDEMIC SPECIES FROM NORTHEAST OREGON MARK E. DARRACH * Herbarium, Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195 [email protected] [email protected] *present address: Umatilla National Forest 72510 Coyote Road Pendleton, Oregon 97801 CODY E. HINCHLIFF Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 [email protected] ABSTRACT Lomatium tarantuloides Darrach & Hinchliff, sp. nov. , is a narrow endemic of conservation concern growing primarily in shallow, gravelly, serpentine-derived soils in a small area of the Malheur, Umatilla, and Wallowa-Whitman National Forests in Grant County of northeastern Oregon. The species is distinguished from other members of the genus by leaf morphology, prostrate inflorescences and infructescences, fruit shape, and pedicel length. The presently recognized populations are primarily confined to small patches within a several km 2 area in the higher elevations of the Greenhorn Mountains in the Blue Mountain physiographic province. Populations are of densely clustered plants in sites often characterized by persistent rodent-perpetuated disturbance where the new species tends to display the highest biomass of any single vascular plant species present. Lomatium is by far the largest genus in Apiaceae in North America. Several new species from the USA have been described over the last few years, including L. ochocense Helliwell (2010), L. bentonitum Carlson & Mansfield (Carlson et al.
    [Show full text]