DOCSLIB.ORG

Do You Know Who Is Treating You? a Patients Guide to Doctors in Training 30/03

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Do You Know Who Is Treating You? a Patients Guide to Doctors in Training 30/03 Do you know who is treating you? A patient’s guide to doctors in training March 2010 previous | next | contents | print | exit Contents Foreword 04 A few key facts about doctors in training 06 Who is treating me? 07 Doctors in training: who you might meet 08 Finding out about the doctor treating you 12 How to get involved in training 15 About this guide 17 previous | next | contents | print | exit “A long overdue guide, telling patients and the public what they need to know about doctors in training.” Professor Sir Neil Douglas Chairman, Academy of Medical Royal Colleges previous | next | contents | print | exit Doctors in training have always Patients tell us that they are Foreword played a crucial role in the NHS. happy to be treated by doctors They join the NHS after university in training but want reassurance and begin the long journey to that doctors are appropriately becoming GPs, consultants or trained and supervised. This specialty doctors. They learn guide sets out what patients and by treating patients as well as the public need to know about from formal education. Without doctors in training. It explains these doctors in training, the NHS how trainee doctors start by would not be able to continue. typically undertaking a five year In recent years, doctors’ roles degree, followed by a two-year and training have changed Foundation Programme before to improve the quality of care moving into specialty training. they provide. However, some patients tell us that they do not understand the training path for doctors or what doctors’ new job titles mean. previous | next | contents | print | exit 4 A patient’s guide to doctors in training Finally, we outline the active role that the public and patients can play in educating doctors. Doctors in training can learn much from sharing about a patient’s own experience of healthcare. We want you to share your views about what doctors should be taught during their training and have suggested practical ways to get involved. I look forward to hearing from you. Professor Sir Neil Douglas Chairman, Academy of Medical Royal Colleges previous | next | contents | print | exit 4 A patient’s guide to doctors in training A few key facts about doctors in training There are around 50,000 doctors in the NHS working towards a higher qualification in a medical specialty or towards becoming a consultant They are employed to treat patients, learning from this experience as well as on formal courses All doctors in training work in teams with senior doctors who manage and supervise their work previous | next | contents | print | exit Doctors in training may be known by a number of titles such as foundation doctor or junior doctor A patient’s guide to doctors in training 7 Who is treating me? Patients want to know who is treating them: “I’ve seen a number of trainee doctors in my GP surgery. Sometimes the trainee is listening to the GP and sometimes the other way round. I always prefer it when the receptionist lets me know in advance and asks if I am happy to have the trainee there. That gives me a chance to say no if I feel I want to.” Female patient, London Patients tell us that they want to know who is treating them but they are unsure of how doctors are trained, what qualifications they have and what their job titles mean. previous | next | contents | print | exit A patient’s guide to doctors in training 7 NHS patients are treated by • Typical titles are junior doctor, Doctors in doctors at different levels of foundation doctor, F1 or F2. training. Here are some basic A junior doctor is any doctor training: who facts to help explain the different who has completed medical stages of medical education school and is in training to be a you might meet and how doctors in training are consultant. supervised. At the end of two years, Foundation doctors foundation doctors decide • The first step after university whether to enter a specialist area for doctors is a two-year of medicine, such as surgery or Foundation Programme, psychiatry, or to train as a GP. At working in different medical the point of entering training they specialities under supervision become registrars. of senior doctors to gain Specialty registrars (SpR) practical experience and skills. • After the Foundation • Satisfactory completion of Programme, doctors enter the first year allows a doctor specialty or GP training. to apply to be added to the • They spend between three GMC Register. Satisfactory and eight years, depending on completion of the second year the specialty, completing this of the Foundation Programme training to become either a GP results in the award of the or consultant. This may take Foundation Achievement of previous | next | contents | print | exit longer if the doctor takes time Competence Document. out from training to do research 8 A patient’s guide to doctors in training A patient’s guide to doctors in training 9 Consultant Foundation doctor Specialty registrar GP 2 year programme 3 - 8 years training Specialty doctor or have a family. Many doctors • They look after patients • Specialty registrars who also choose to work part-time. in clinics and perform successfully complete their • As they progress through procedures under the training can apply to become their training they gain more supervision of other senior a GP or a consultant. experience, knowledge and doctors and consultants, • Although typically these competence. increasing their knowledge doctors are known as and skills. • Registrars work in a specialist registrars, you may also see area, such as obstetrics or titles such as SpR1,SpR2,SpR3 surgery or anaesthetics. etc or StR1, 2, 3 etc where the number shows their years spent in specialty training. previous | next | contents | print | exit 8 A patient’s guide to doctors in training A patient’s guide to doctors in training 9 Specialty doctors Consultants • Some doctors do not complete Consultants are doctors who specialty training but can still are responsible for your care work as specialty doctors. and are responsible for all other They have a wide range of experience, and at least have doctors who you may see on his four years of postgraduate or her behalf. This is for both a training. patient staying in hospital and • The specialty doctor title was for an outpatient. These doctors introduced in 2008 to replace are on the GMC’s Specialist titles such as staff grade, Register and have completed all clinical medical officer and necessary steps in their training hospital practitioner. You may to work unsupervised still see these used. as specialists. • In many cases, specialty doctors are senior doctors. However, they will also be supervised and a consultant will have overall care of the patient. previous | next | contents | print | exit 10 A patient’s guide to doctors in training As doctors progress through training they gain more experience, knowledge and skill previous | next | contents | print | exit 10 A patient’s guide to doctors in training Finding out about the doctor treating you previous | next | contents | print | exit “I think it is important that elements. However, there patients know when they are is a lot of difference in being treated by a trainee. competency and experience I am very aware that the between a first year trainee majority of patients have and a final year trainee and limited understanding of it is important to put the title the titles used by doctors, into context. other than consultant and I also think that it is GP. I therefore tend to important to emphasise that introduce myself as either a there is a senior doctor doctor / psychiatrist / higher supervising the care.” trainee currently working with my consultant. I would Doctor in training (SpR in Child & advise new trainees to try Adolescent Forensic Psychiatry) to emphasise that they are both a qualified doctor and a trainee. I think this is difficult to do as I suspect that patients often think that these are not mutually compatible. The term ‘junior doctor’ is often helpful for patients as it captures both previous | next | contents | print | exit Patients tell us that they are In your discussions with your happy to be seen by a doctor doctor, it is possible to ask them: in training but that they want to • What is your job title? know about the doctor’s level of training and experience. They • Where are you in your training also tell us that doctors who programme? explain their level of training, • How are you supervised? experience, competence and supervision are able to put them If you are not happy to see a at ease. However, when doctors doctor in training and wish to do not take the time to explain, see the supervising doctor with patients say that they feel unable to ask questions. more experience, this should be arranged for you although it may There is guidance for doctors take some time. on how they should introduce themselves and explain their level of training to a patient when examining or treating them. The doctor should check that each patient is happy with the situation and can answer any questions the patient may have about their doctor’s training and experience. previous | next | contents | print | exit 14 A patient’s guide to doctors in training How to get involved in training Patients have a great deal to contribute to medical training - not just as “interesting cases” but as active participants sharing their experiences of healthcare. Some of the ways patients can get involved include: previous | next | contents | print | exit 14 A patient’s guide to doctors in training Medical Royal Colleges Working with your doctor Department of Health • Patients can get involved in Share your personal experiences • Local Involvement Networks designing and delivering of healthcare by filling in the (LiNKs) are established in specialist training through the feedback forms provided by most local authorities in order medical Royal Colleges.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VOTING with THEIR FEET Migrant Zimbabwean Nurses and Doctors In
    Research Report No. 111 Rudo Gaidzanwa VOTING WITH THEIR FEET Migrant Zimbabwean Nurses and Doctors in the Era of Structural Adjustment Nordiska Afrikainstitutet Uppsala 1999 This report was commissioned and produced under the auspices of the Nordic Africa Institute´s programme on The Political and Social Context of Structural Adjustment in Sub-Saharan Africa. It is one of a series of reports published on the theme of structural adjustment and socio-economic change in contemporary Africa. Programme Co-ordinator and Series Editor: Adebayo O. Olukoshi Indexing terms Medical personnel Labour migration Structural adjustment Zimbabwe Language checking: Elaine Almén ISSN 1104-8425 ISBN 91-7106-445-1 © the author and Nordiska Afrikainstitutet 1999 Printed in Sweden by Motala Grafiska 1999 Contents Introduction...............................................................................................................................5 Aim and Objectives................................................................................................................9 Literature Review ..................................................................................................................10 The History of the Modern Medical Profession in Zimbabwe...........................15 Methodology ...........................................................................................................................26 Preliminary Observations from the Data Collection Process..............................29 Analysis of Research Findings.........................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • GP Clinical Supervision Handbook Foundation Programme Training In
    GP Clinical Supervision Handbook Foundation Programme Training in General Practice A Guide for: The Development of GP Educators Health Education England Kent, Surrey & Sussex working with South Thames Foundation School HEE KSS - CS Educator Handbook – v5 Page 1 of 63 September 2018 Contents Glossary of Terms 3 Introduction 4 Background 5 Key Themes 5 The Curriculum for Foundation Doctors 8 Assessment of Foundation Doctors 9 The Foundation Year 2 Doctor in Practice 10 Non-standard Foundation programme Year 2 Rotations 13 FY2 Performance Concerns 13 The End of the Rotation 14 Key Personnel involved in the Foundation Programme 14 FY2 Clinical Supervisor – Criteria for Application 16 FY2 Clinical Supervisor – Educator Pathway FAQs 17 The GP Educational Pathway - Flowchart 19 The Competences of a GP Educator 20 Equal Opportunities & Diversity Training 22 Postgraduate Certificate for Medical Educators 22 The GP Educator Portfolio 23 Temporary Abeyance of Approval 24 The Foundation Programme Doctor – FAQ’s 25 End of Placement 28 Appendix 1 – HEE Kent Surrey & Sussex – Key Personnel 29 Appendix 2 – Overview of the FY2 Curriculum 31 Appendix 3 – Possible Teaching Topics for CS, FY2 Weekly Tutorials 33 Appendix 4a, 4b & 4c – Single Employer Honorary Educational Contract 34 Appendix 5a & 5b – GP Peer Educational Review & PDP (including competencies) 41 Appendix 6 – HEE KSS Educator Pathway - Application Form links 53 Appendix 7 – CS & Practice Visits – Initial Approval Re-Approval & Solo Visits 58 Appendix 8 – Practice Approval , CS Approval and
    [Show full text]
  • MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS 2 Hospital Staff the People Who Work
    MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS 2 Hospital Staff The people who work in any type of workplace, including hospitals, are called the staff. The medical staff in a British hospital belong to one of four main groups: • A pre-registration house officer (PRHO), or house officer, is a newly graduated doctor in the first year of postgraduate training. After a year, he or she becomes a registered medical practitioner. In the current system of training, the Foundation Programme, the name for these junior doctors is Foundation Year 1 doctor (FYI). • A senior house officer (SHO) is in the second year of postgraduate training. The title is now Foundation Year 2 doctor (FY2), but the old terms senior house officer and SHO are still used. • A specialist registrar (SpR) is a doctor who has completed the Foundation Programme, and is training in one of the medical specialties. There are also some non-training registrars -- doctors who have completed their training but do not wish to specialize yet. • A consultant is a fully qualified specialist. There may also be some associate specialists – senior doctors who do not wish to become consultants. In addition, there is at least one medical (or clinical) director, who is responsible for all of the medical staff. Medical Teams Consultant physicians and surgeons are responsible for a specific number of patients in the hospital. Each consultant has a team of junior doctors to help care for those patients. In many hospitals, there are multidisciplinary teams which consist not only of doctors but also of physiotherapists and other allied health professionals. When patients enter- or are admitted to –hospital, they are usually seen first by one of the junior doctors on the ward where they will receive treatment and care.
    [Show full text]
  • Junior Doctors' Handbook on the 2016 Contract
    Junior doctors’ handbook on the 2016 contract A guide to the new 2016 terms and conditions of service for doctors and dentists in training in England April 2021 Version 2.0 British Medical Association bma.org.uk British Medical Association Junior doctors’ handbook on the 2016 contract Contents 1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................................2 2. Training appointments and educational approval .................................................................................3 3. Learning and development .............................................................................................................................5 4. Recruitment to specialty training – advice for applicants ..................................................................7 5. Contracts of employment ................................................................................................................................9 6. Pay ........................................................................................................................................................................... 13 7. Work Scheduling ............................................................................................................................................... 24 8. Hours of work and WTR ................................................................................................................................... 31 9. Exception
    [Show full text]
  • The Millennial Doctor – a Blue Collar Worker?
    Future Hospital Journal 2017 Vol 4, No 1: 45–8 COMMENT T h e m i l l e n n i a l d o c t o r – A b l u e c o l l a r w o r k e r ? A B Authors: O r o d O s a n l o u a n d R i c h a r d H u l l The face of medical training has transformed over the last highest quality of care as part of an experienced consultant-led two decades. This has impacted education and training, firm. The loss of this ‘firm’ structure is significant because, work ethic and pride within the profession. There are serious within teams, doctors were nurtured and a work ethic concerns that rigid working hours, shift systems, erosion of developed that created professionals with integrity, compassion, team-working (with all of the implications this carries for the altruism and commitment to professional development. We risk ABSTRACT essential ‘apprenticeship’ of postgraduate medical training) accepting competence rather than excellence; a generation of and repeated political interference will transform the millennial doctors stifled by protocols, unable to innovate and discouraged doctor into a ‘blue collar’ worker. Morale is at an all-time from asking ‘why’ in the effort to change practice for the better. low and more needs to be done to support and value junior To quote Sir John Tooke in his 2008 Modernising Medical doctors, raise awareness of work-life balance issues and improve Careers (MMC) enquiry report, ‘put simply “good enough” working lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Junior Doctors Competent in Providing Effective Feedback to Medical Students?
    Advances in Medical Education and Practice Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article LETTER Are junior doctors competent in providing effective feedback to medical students? Elliott Yann Ah-kee1 Dear editor Aamir Asif Khan2 Effective feedback is widely recognized as one of the main catalysts for learners to 1Monklands Hospital, Airdrie, North achieve their educational goals and fulfill their potential. Its crucial role in medical Lanarkshire, UK; 2Glasgow Royal education has been well established over many years.1 However, previous studies of Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, UK medical student perceptions show that they are dissatisfied with the feedback received from tutors. The key findings were the lack of feedback on medical students’ perfor- mances or inadequate feedback when provided.2,3 In the UK, provisionally registered doctors (foundation doctors in their first year of training following graduation) are expected by the General Medical Council to teach medical students. In addition, they should also “contribute to the appraisal, assessment or review of students and colleagues”.4 One of the main issues expressed by medi- cal students is the lack of feedback as mentioned. Foundation doctors often ask for formal feedback from the medical students they teach in order to collect evidence to fulfill teaching requirements of the training program. However, in many cases, feedback to medical students is not always forthcoming and this can potentially hinder their educational development. In addition, literature on the quality of feedback provided by junior doctors is scarce. This raises an important question: are junior doctors competent in giving effective feedback? As junior doctors with an interest in medical education, we believe that there is a lack of formal training on how to provide effective feedback, within the UK undergraduate curriculum.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Clinical Pathologists
    The Bulletin of The Royal College of Pathologists Number 163 July 2013 In this issue The Royal College of Pathologists Everything you wanted to know about your new Pathology: the science behind the cure consultant post but were afraid to ask Voice recognition in histopathology: pros and cons Public Engagement Innovation Grant Scheme www.rcpath.org/bulletin Subscribe to the Bulletin of The Royal College of Pathologists The College’s quarterly membership journal, the Bulletin, is the main means of communications between the College and its members, and between the members themselves. It features topical articles on the latest development in pathology, news from the College, as well as key events and information related to pathology. The Bulletin is delivered free of charge to all active College Members, retired Members who choose to receive mailings and Registered Trainees, and is published four times a year, in January, April, July and October. It is also available for our members to download on the College website at www.rcpath.org/bulletin The subscription rate for libraries and non-members is £100 per annum. To subscribe, contact the Publications Department on 020 7451 6730 or [email protected] Sign up today and keep up to date on what goes on in the world of pathology! The Royal College of Pathologists 2 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AF telephone 020 7451 6700 email [email protected] website www.rcpath.org President Dr Archie Prentice Vice Presidents Dr Bernie Croal Dr Suzy Lishman Professor Mike Wells Registrar Dr Rachael
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Beneficial Competition in the Health Professions 2004
    Enhancing Beneficial Competition in the Health Professions 2004 The OECD Competition Committee debated Enhancing Beneficial Competition in the Health Professions in October 2004. This document includes an executive summary and the documents from the meeting: an analytical note by Mr. Sean Ennis of the OECD, written submissions from Denmark, the European Commission, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States, as well as an aide-memoire of the discussion. Restrictions on entry into the health professions serve the important purpose of protecting consumers from unqualified health care practitioners. However, sometimes the restrictions go too far. The limits on entry to a profession govern the qualifications and skills of practitioners as well as, occasionally, the quantity and geographic locations of practices. These limits may be excessive, overly restricting competition and raising healthcare costs. Para-professionals and alternative professionals are often unduly restricted in both the types of work that they can perform and in their freedom to operate in an autonomous or semi-autonomous environment. Sometimes these restrictions are created by the professionals with whom the paraprofessionals would partially compete. Health related products, such as eyeglasses, contact lenses, hearing aids, non-prescription drugs and dentures, are sometimes made unavailable unless consumers have first undergone tests that are not directly related to the provision of the product or unless they purchase products from specific suppliers. Professional associations often introduce rules that govern the commercial behaviour of members but do not protect consumers. Rather, such restrictions raise prices to consumers and increase profits for providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Changes on Junior Doctor Rotas and Training
    Impact of changes on junior doctor rotas and training South West Senate: Question-12: Q: Describe the model of the potential impact of changes at CGH on junior doctor supervision, training and rotas and the accreditation of these posts. Engagement with Deanery regarding the full scope of the proposed changes would be helpful to demonstrate given the reference to concerns with surgical trainees Engagement with the Deanery The overarching concerns from trainees are that historically there was a significant imbalance between CGH and GRH in surgical workload and opportunity. This meant less than ideal training experience for surgeons on either side – too much emergency work in GRH to get to theatre and too little surgical experience in CGH for the number of trainees placed there. Part of the aim of the EGS reconfiguration is to better manage the emergency workload and even out the opportunities for specialist surgical experience. The surgical clinical tutor and deanery representative have been in contact with the training programme director for surgery to discuss how we are responding to the concerns raised. Further work is ongoing with the Director of Medical Education, Training programme directors and Clinical Tutors to review the training opportunities that the future configuration of services and will provide. This will then be shared and discussed with the Programme Directors and Heads of School for Medicine and Surgery. General advice from the Deanery: It is important to maintain foundation trainee post numbers across the trust and all the work schedules for posts affected will be reviewed to ensure suitable learning opportunities are still open to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Junior Doctors Network Newsletter Issue 22 June 2021
    Junior Doctors Network Newsletter Issue 22 June 2021 JUNIOR DOCTORS NETWORK empowering young physicians to work together towards a healthier world through advocacy, education, and international collaboration Published by the Junior Doctors Network of the World Medical Association The information, perspectives, and opinions expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the World Medical Association or the Junior Doctors Network. WMA and WMA-JDN do not assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information presented. ISSN (print) 2415-1122 ISSN (online) 2312-220X Junior Doctors Network Newsletter Issue 22 June 2021 Junior Doctors Leadership 2020-2021 SOCIO-MEDICAL CHAIR DEPUTY CHAIR SECRETARY AFFAIRS OFFICER Dr Yassen Tcholakov Dr Julie Bacqué Dr Wunna Tun Dr Manon Pigeolet Canada France Myanmar Belgium EDUCATION MEDICAL ETHICS MEMBERSHIP PUBLICATIONS DIRECTOR OFFICER DIRECTOR DIRECTOR Dr Uchechukwu Arum Dr Lwando Maki Dr Lyndah Kemunto Dr Helena Chapman Nigeria/United Kingdom South Africa Kenya Dominican Republic COMMUNICATIONS IMMEDIATE PAST DIRECTOR CHAIR Dr Chukwuma Dr Maki Okamoto Oraegbunam Japan Nigeria Page 2 Junior Doctors Network Newsletter Issue 22 June 2021 Editorial Team 2020−2021 Dr Victor Animasahun Dr Nishwa Azeem Dr Sejin Choi Dr Ricardo Correa Nigeria Pakistan Republic of Korea Panama/United States Dr Giacomo Crotti Dr Suleiman A. Idris Dr Mashkur Isa Dr Jooyoung Moon Italy Nigeria Nigeria/United Kingdom Republic of Korea Dr Vandrome Nakundi Dr Mellany
    [Show full text]
  • Junior Doctor Contract
    JUNIOR DOCTOR CONTRACT Mrs Paula Eyre, Head of Medical HR Dr Guy Veall, Guardian of Safe Working Hours Why change? All parties (BMA, DH, NHS) agreed that the current (New Deal) contract was no longer fit for purpose: – Safety: does not support safe working practices – Training: does not support the educational and training needs of doctors – Pay: has perverse incentives that do not recognise or effectively reward hours being worked or the intensity of work being done. A new contract needed to be introduced that was safe, fair and effective for both doctors and employers. PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST Limitations of the New Deal contract 2002 • BMA and DDRB thought basic pay was too low compared with other graduates. • Perverse incentive: breaching EWTD limits resulted in more pay. • Significant variation of individual earnings as a trainee moved between posts and placements. • Did not harmonise education, training, and service needs. • Pay progression was based on time served, instead of performance, competence, or responsibility. PROUD TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST New Contract Implementation Timeline • October 2016 - Transition to the new terms and conditions of service for: – ST3+ in obstetrics and gynaecology training programmes. • November – December 2016 (106 doctors) - Transition to the new terms and conditions of service for: – F1s (taking up next appointment) – F2 (taking up next appointment and sharing a rota with F1s) • February – April 2017 (34 doctors) - All grades taking up next appointments in: – Psychiatry – Pathology – Paediatrics – Surgical trainees (under JCST) – Any F2 and GP trainees at ST1/2 who share a rota with trainees above in this category.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadening the Foundation Programme
    Developing people for health and healthcare Broadening the Foundation Programme Recommendations and implementation guidance February 2014 BROADENING THE FOUNDATION PROGRAMME 2 BROADENING THE FOUNDATION PROGRAMME Contents Foreword 4 Introduction 5 Executive summary 6 Chapter 1: Background 12 Chapter 2: Methodology 21 Chapter 3: Overview of the evidence 24 Chapter 4: Recommendations 38 Chapter 5: Implementation 46 Appendix 1: Guidance for LETBs 50 Appendix 2: Guidance for LEPs 54 Appendix 3: Guidance for trainees 57 Appendix 4: Case study template 58 Appendix 5: Case studies 60 Appendix 6: Focus group evidence 89 Appendix 7: Literature review 92 Appendix 8: Department of Health MPET SLA 2012-2013 114 Appendix 9: The working groups 115 Appendix 10: Broadening the Foundation Programme – terms of reference 116 Appendix 11: Definition of terms 125 Appendix 12: Case studies and focus groups 128 Appendix 13: Physician associate posts in UK hospitals 129 Appendix 14: Bibliography 130 3 BROADENING THE FOUNDATION PROGRAMME Foreword With my many years of experience in the NHS, ranging from life as a frontline consultant to my current role as a Chief Executive, I have recognised the importance of having a flexible workforce, capable of meeting the needs of all our patients. I wholeheartedly support the recommendations in this report. As we move away from the historic paradigms of primary and secondary care settings, we need to ensure that the training of our doctors continues to be aligned to the needs of the patient. This means we need to train our doctors so that they are capable of working in different, innovative, integrated care settings.
    [Show full text]