Next-Generation Digital Earth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Next-Generation Digital Earth PERSPECTIVE Next-generation Digital Earth Michael F. Goodchilda,1, Huadong Guob, Alessandro Annonic, Ling Biand, Kees de Biee, Frederick Campbellf, Max Cragliac, Manfred Ehlersg, John van Genderene, Davina Jacksonh, Anthony J. Lewisi, Martino Pesaresic, Gábor Remetey-Fülöppj, Richard Simpsonk, Andrew Skidmoref, Changlin Wangb, and Peter Woodgatel aDepartment of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; bCenter for Earth Observation and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China; cJoint Research Centre of the European Commission, 21027 Ispra, Italy; dDepartment of Geography, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14261; eFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands; fFred Campbell Consulting, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2H 5G8; gInstitute for Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing, University of Osnabrück, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany; hD_City Network, Newtown 2042, Australia; iDepartment of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803; jHungarian Association for Geo-Information, H-1122, Budapest, Hungary; kNextspace, Auckland 1542, New Zealand; and lCooperative Research Center for Spatial Information, Carlton South 3053, Australia Edited by Kenneth Wachter, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved May 14, 2012 (received for review March 1, 2012) A speech of then-Vice President Al Gore in 1998 created a vision for a Digital Earth, and played a role in stimulating the development of a first generation of virtual globes, typified by Google Earth, that achieved many but not all the elements of this vision. The technical achievements of Google Earth, and the functionality of this first generation of virtual globes, are reviewed against the Gore vision. Meanwhile, developments in technology continue, the era of “big data” has arrived, the general public is more and more engaged with technology through citizen science and crowd-sourcing, and advances have been made in our scientific understanding of the Earth system. However, although Google Earth stimulated progress in communicating the results of science, there continue to be substantial barriers in the public’s access to science. All these factors prompt a reexamination of the initial vision of Digital Earth, and a discussion of the major elements that should be part of a next generation. scientific communication | visualization igital replicas of complex enti- surface and near-surface of the Earth, and jections entirely by showing the Earth as ties and systems are now rou- could be used to illustrate and even ad- seen from space (technically a perspective D tine in many fields—in the dress a host of problems facing humanity, orthographic projection onto the 2D design and testing stages of from climate change and natural disasters plane of the screen), measured distance by aerospace engineering, in digital re- to warfare, hunger, and poverty (see, for using the length of the shortest path over constructions of ancient cities, or even in example, the 2009 Beijing Declaration the curved surface, and reduced scale to physiology, in which digital cadavers can on Digital Earth; 159.226.224.4/isde6en/ the simple metaphor of raising or lowering replace real ones in the training of medical hykx11.html). The Chinese Academy of the user’s viewpoint. A fly-by, the “magic students. The concept of a Digital Earth, Sciences responded by organizing the first carpet ride” of the Gore speech, the a digital replica of the entire planet, occurs International Symposium on Digital Earth capstone achievement for generations of in Al Gore’s 1992 book Earth in the in Beijing in 1999; the symposium became undergraduate GIS students, could be Balance (1), and was developed further a biennial event, and has been held in created by a child of age 10 in 10 minutes in a speech written for delivery by Gore Canada, the Czech Republic, Japan, the by using nothing more than a home at the opening of the California Sci- United States, China, and Australia. In computer and a downloaded Google ence Center in January 1998 (portal. 2006, the International Society for Digital Earth client. opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id= Earth (ISDE) was established, and bi- There will always be a need for flattening 6210). By the turn of the century, support ennial Digital Earth Summits have been the Earth, to see the entire surface at once, for advanced 3D graphics had become convened in New Zealand, Germany, and albeit distorted, or to present information ’ fi standard on personal computers, allowing Bulgaria. In 2008, ISDE sof cial publica- on paper. However, there is no doubt that real-time manipulation of complex ob- tion, the International Journal of Digital virtual globes had enormous advantages jects. Following the speech, the Clinton Earth, was inaugurated. over traditional maps as a means of com- Administration directed NASA to form In this concept of Digital Earth, sharing municating data, information, and knowl- fi fi a Digital Earth of ce, a number of pro- of scienti c information about the planet edge about the surface and near-surface of fi totype projects were begun, and, with the could extend well beyond the scienti c the planet. Here for the first time were 2005 launch of the Google Earth service, community, to people with very limited software environments that could overlay fi — a ne-resolution, digital replica of the technical skills and computing resources layers of information by using geographic planet, or at least of its surface, was within the vision of an information food chain location as a common key, show buildings reach of anyone with a broadband Internet extending all the way from science to and vegetation as complex 3D structures, connection. public policy seemed almost within reach. fi ’ pan and zoom at the click of a mouse, and The effect on the scienti c community Google s own Earth Engine project ex- visualize extracts from petabytes of rapidly was immediate and palpable (2). Here was emplifies this vision by making available a readily accessible technology that could Gore’s “vast quantities of geo-referenced be used to present scientific data and re- information.” Unlike geographic infor- fi Author contributions: M.F.G., H.G., A.A., L.B., K.d.B., F.C., sults (scienti c applications of Google mation systems (GISs), which have a rep- M.C., M.E., J.v.G., D.J., A.J.L., M.P., G.R.-F., R.S., A.S., C.W., Earth were recently reviewed in ref. 3) in utation for being difficult to learn, and and P.W. wrote the paper. easily digestible, visual form to collabo- force users to confront the intuitively dif- The authors declare no conflict of interest. rators and a general public that perceived ficult spatial concepts of scale and map This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. it as free, fast, and fun. Digital Earth had projections, Digital Earth implementa- 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: relevance to any science dealing with the tions such as Google Earth avoided pro- [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1202383109 PNAS Early Edition | 1of7 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 accumulating georeferenced information ence. Open-source packages such as dragged to contain the pole itself, or to in fractions of a second. NASA’s World Wind can be extended intersect with 180° longitude. The mathe- It is now 7 years since the launch of with new code, and Google’s Application matics of the spheroid are difficult, and Google Earth, and a similar period has Programming Interface allows Google perhaps shortcuts are being taken, for ex- elapsed since the release of the earliest of Earth functions to be embedded within the ample, by resorting to calculations on the what is now a long list of comparable virtual user’s own application. sphere or on a planar projection when the globes, including NASA’s open-source Virtual globes that are able to capture spheroid becomes less tractable. WorldWind (worldwind.arc.nasa.gov), and display elevation above or below the Problems of dealing with uncertainty Wuhan University’s GeoGlobe, the Chi- surface have obvious applications in may have broader implications. Positions nese Academy of Sciences Digital Earth oceanography, atmospheric science, and on the Earth are the result of measure- Prototype System, Microsoft’s Bing Maps geomorphology. Since its initial launch, ment, and thus have accuracies that are (www.bing.com/maps), Esri’s ArcGIS Google has also enhanced the temporal limited by the measuring device. It is Explorer (www.esri.com/software/arcgis/ dimensions of Google Earth, allowing the a long-established principle of science that explorer/), Unidata’s Integrated Data display of time series and the use of historic measurements should be reported with Viewer (www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/ base maps. Unidata’s Thematic Realtime a numerical precision that matches their idv/), and Digitnext’s VirtualGeo (virtual- Environmental Distributed Data Services accuracy, and the principle provides easy geo.diginext.fr/EN/). It is also more than project (www.unidata.ucar.edu/projects/ access to estimates of inherent uncertainty. a decade since the Gore speech and the THREDDS/) aims to facilitate sharing of However, latitudes and longitudes are vision that did much to motivate these data among Earth scientists using the routinely reported by Google Earth to as efforts, which, in some cases, have ex- Integrated Data Viewer platform, and many as six decimal places of degrees tended well beyond the Gore vision. This includes a full range of 3D and tempo- (corresponding, in the case of latitude, or seems an appropriate time, therefore, to ral support. longitude at the equator, to ∼10 cm) ir- examine what this first generation has Nevertheless, this first generation of respective of the spatial resolution of the achieved, and to envision what might be virtual globes has several limitations, each display.
Recommended publications
  • The Power of Virtual Globes for Valorising Cultural Heritage and Enabling Sustainable Tourism: Nasa World Wind Applications
    International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XL-4/W2, 2013 ISPRS WebMGS 2013 & DMGIS 2013, 11 – 12 November 2013, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China Topics: Global Spatial Grid & Cloud-based Services THE POWER OF VIRTUAL GLOBES FOR VALORISING CULTURAL HERITAGE AND ENABLING SUSTAINABLE TOURISM: NASA WORLD WIND APPLICATIONS M. A. Brovelli a , P. Hogan b , M. Minghini a , G. Zamboni a a Politecnico di Milano, DICA, Laboratorio di Geomatica, Como Campus, via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy - [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] b NASA Ames Research Center, M/S 244-14, Moffett Field, CA USA - [email protected] Commission IV, Working Group IV/5 KEY WORDS: Cultural Heritage, GIS, Three-dimensional, Virtual Globe, Web based ABSTRACT: Inspired by the visionary idea of Digital Earth, as well as from the tremendous improvements in geo-technologies, use of virtual globes has been changing the way people approach to geographic information on the Web. Unlike the traditional 2D-visualization typical of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), virtual globes offer multi-dimensional, fully-realistic content visualization which allows for a much richer user experience. This research investigates the potential for using virtual globes to foster tourism and enhance cultural heritage. The paper first outlines the state of the art for existing virtual globes, pointing out some possible categorizations according to license type, platform-dependence, application type, default layers, functionalities and freedom of customization. Based on this analysis, the NASA World Wind virtual globe is the preferred tool for promoting tourism and cultural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • 35 - VGI and Beyond: from Data to Mapping
    Antoniou, V., Capineri, C. and Haklay, M., 2018. VGI and Beyond: From Data to Mapping. in: A.J. Kent and P. Vujakovic (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Mapping and Cartography. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 475 - 488 35 - VGI and Beyond: From Data to Mapping Vyron Antoniou, Cristina Capineri and Muki (Mordechai) Haklay This chapter will introduce the concept of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) within practices of mapping and cartography. Our aim is to provide an accessible overview of the area, which has grown rapidly in the past decade, but first we need to define what we mean by VGI. Defining VGI In a seminal paper published in 2007, Mike Goodchild coined the term Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in an effort to describe ‘the widespread engagement of large numbers of private citizens, often with little in the way of formal qualifications, in the creation of geographic information’ (Goodchild, 2007: 217). At that point, rudimentary crowdsourced Geographic Information (GI) was created and disseminated freely with the help of innovative desktop applications (e.g. Google Earth) or web-based platforms (e.g. Wikimapia, OpenStreetMap). By crowdsourcing we refer to the action of multiple participants (sometimes thousands or even millions) in the generation of geographical information, when these participants are external to the organization that manages the information and are not formally employed by it. Since then a lot has changed and VGI now has a deep and broad agenda that ranges from implicitly contributed GI through social networks to rigorously-monitored citizen science projects. However, before we continue the discussion on this subject, it is necessary to shed light onto the key factors that have helped to create this phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • Next-Generation Digital Earth
    Next-generation Digital Earth Michael F. Goodchilda,1, Huadong Guob, Alessandro Annonic, Ling Biand, Kees de Biee, Frederick Campbellf, Max Cragliac, Manfred Ehlersg, John van Genderene, Davina Jacksonh, Anthony J. Lewisi, Martino Pesaresic, Gábor Remetey-Fülöppj, Richard Simpsonk, Andrew Skidmoref, Changlin Wangb, and Peter Woodgatel aDepartment of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; bCenter for Earth Observation and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China; cJoint Research Centre of the European Commission, 21027 Ispra, Italy; dDepartment of Geography, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14261; eFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands; fFred Campbell Consulting, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2H 5G8; gInstitute for Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing, University of Osnabrück, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany; hD_City Network, Newtown 2042, Australia; iDepartment of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803; jHungarian Association for Geo-Information, H-1122, Budapest, Hungary; kNextspace, Auckland 1542, New Zealand; and lCooperative Research Center for Spatial Information, Carlton South 3053, Australia Edited by Kenneth Wachter, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved May 14, 2012 (received for review March 1, 2012) A speech of then-Vice President Al Gore in 1998 created a vision for a Digital Earth, and played a role in stimulating the development of a first generation of virtual globes, typified by Google Earth, that achieved many but not all the elements of this vision. The technical achievements of Google Earth, and the functionality of this first generation of virtual globes, are reviewed against the Gore vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Discrete Global Grid Systems to Integrate Statistical and Geospatial Information
    Discrete Global Grid Systems to integrate statistical and geospatial information Adam Lewis, A/Chief Scientist, Geoscience Australia ([email protected]) with contributions from Matthew Purss, Stuart Minchin, Robert Gibb, Faramarz Samavati, Perry Peterson, Clinton Dow, Jin Ben, Jonathan Ross, Trevor Dhu, Martin Brady UNECE – Workshop on Integrating Geospatial and Statistical Standards Stockholm, Sweden, 6-8 November 2017 Geographical data in official statistics Geographical data has an established role in official statistics, playing a greater or lesser part in some countries and applications than others • US Department of Agriculture and US National Agricultural Statistical Services may be the exemplar • Applies remote sensing and field data in a rigorous process • Appropriate care is needed; e.g., ‘pixel counting’ is not sufficient - estimation biases need to be addressed (which is straightforward) UNECE – Workshop on Integrating Geospatial and Statistical Standards 2017 Geographical data in official statistics Martin Brady, Australian Bureau of Statistics UNECE – Workshop on Integrating Geospatial and Statistical Standards 2017 The role of geospatial data is increasing Frequent observation is the most important factor in useful data “heavy volumes of time series imagery important” (D M Johnson) Weekly, high-quality, operational observation is now a reality through multiple government and commercial systems E.g., over Australia: • Landsat data 1987-2017 ~ 400TB • Sentinel-2 data 2015-2017 ~ 200TB Globally, Sentinel 1 & 2 ~ 10 PB per
    [Show full text]
  • A Companion to Contemporary Documentary Filn1
    A Companion to Contemporary Documentary Filn1 Edited by Alexandra Juhasz and Alisa Lebow WI LEY Blackwell 2 o ,�- This edition first published 2015 © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc, excepting Chapter 1 © 2014 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota and Chapter 19 © 2007 Wayne State University Press Registered Office John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK Contents Editorial Offices 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK For details of our global editorial offices,for customer services, and for informationabout how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell. The right of Alexandra Juhasz and Alisa Lebow to be identifiedas the authors of the editorial material in this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print Notes on Contributors ix may not be available in electronic books. Introduction: A World Encountered 1 Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All Alexandra Juhasz and Alisa Lebow brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing the Structure of the Earth's Lithosphere on the Google Earth Virtual-Globe Platform
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article Visualizing the Structure of the Earth’s Lithosphere on the Google Earth Virtual-Globe Platform Liangfeng Zhu 1,2,3,*, Wensheng Kan 1,2, Yu Zhang 1,2 and Jianzhong Sun 1 1 Key Laboratory of GIS, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China; [email protected] (W.K.); [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (J.S.) 2 School of Geography Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China 3 Shanghai Key Lab for Urban Ecology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-136-7172-1009 Academic Editor: Wolfgang Kainz Received: 15 January 2016; Accepted: 29 February 2016; Published: 2 March 2016 Abstract: While many of the current methods for representing the existing global lithospheric models are suitable for academic investigators to conduct professional geological and geophysical research, they are not suited to visualize and disseminate the lithospheric information to non-geological users (such as atmospheric scientists, educators, policy-makers, and even the general public) as they rely on dedicated computer programs or systems to read and work with the models. This shortcoming has become more obvious as more and more people from both academic and non-academic institutions struggle to understand the structure and composition of the Earth’s lithosphere. Google Earth and the concomitant Keyhole Markup Language (KML) provide a universal and user-friendly platform to represent, disseminate, and visualize the existing lithospheric models. We present a systematic framework to visualize and disseminate the structure of the Earth’s lithosphere on Google Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Directions for the Rhealpix Discrete Global Grid System
    Spatial Knowledge and Information Canada, 2019, 7(6), 2 Research directions for the rHEALPix Discrete Global Grid System DAVID BOWATER EMMANUEL STEFANAKIS Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick University of Calgary [email protected] [email protected] data management (Yao and Lin 2018) and ABSTRACT as the de facto global reference system for geospatial big data (OGC 2017b). Discrete Global Grid Systems (DGGSs) are Over the years, several different important to Digital Earth, the Open DGGSs have been created each with Geospatial Consortium (OGC), and big data advantages and disadvantages. However, research. A promising OGC conformant only a subset are deemed appropriate under quadrilateral-based approach is the the OGC DGGS Abstract Specification (OGC rHEALPix DGGS. Despite its advantages 2017a). Importantly, an OGC conformant over hexagonal- or triangular-based DGGSs, DGGS must utilize a method that partitions little research is being done to explore or the earth’s surface into a uniform grid of advance our understanding of it. In this equal area cells. Currently, the most popular paper, we briefly review existing work and method is the Icosahedral Snyder Equal then present several important directions Area (ISEA) projection and a considerable for future research related to harmonic amount of research has focused on analysis, discrete line generation, pure- and hexagonal- or triangular-based DGGSs that mixed-aperture DGGSs, and DGGS-based adopt this approach. distance/direction metrics. That being said, quadrilateral-based DGGSs have several advantages over 1. Introduction hexagonal-or triangular DGGSs, such as compatibility with existing data structures, hardware, display devices, and coordinate A Discrete Global Grid System (DGGS) systems (Sahr et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Msdiwg7-2.7A
    Open Geospatial Consortium Submission Date: 2015-09-30 Approval Date: <yyyy-dd-mm> Publication Date: <yyyy-dd-mm> External identifier of this OGC® document: <http://www.opengis.net/doc/IS/DGGS/1.0> Internal reference number of this OGC® document: 15-104 Version: 1.0.0 Category: OGC® Implementation Standard Editor: Matthew Purss OGC Discrete Global Grid System (DGGS) Core Standard Copyright notice Copyright © 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium To obtain additional rights of use, visit http://www.opengeospatial.org/legal/. Warning This document is not an OGC Standard. This document is distributed for review and comment. This document is subject to change without notice and may not be referred to as an OGC Standard. Recipients of this document are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are aware and to provide supporting documentation. Document type: OGC® Implementation Standard Document subtype: if applicable Document stage: Draft Document language: English 1 Copyright © 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium OGC 15-104r3 License Agreement Permission is hereby granted by the Open Geospatial Consortium, ("Licensor"), free of charge and subject to the terms set forth below, to any person obtaining a copy of this Intellectual Property and any associated documentation, to deal in the Intellectual Property without restriction (except as set forth below), including without limitation the rights to implement, use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, and/or sublicense copies of the Intellectual Property, and to permit persons to whom the Intellectual Property is furnished to do so, provided that all copyright notices on the intellectual property are retained intact and that each person to whom the Intellectual Property is furnished agrees to the terms of this Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • GIM Tool: a Global Icosahedral Atmospheric Model Viewer
    GIM Tool: A Global Icosahedral Atmospheric Model Viewer Authors: Evan Polster, Jeff S Smith, Ning Wang CIRA researchers at Global Systems Division (GSD) of Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) GSD is developing two global icosahedral weather models: the finite-volume flow-following icosahedral model (FIM) [1] and the non-hydrostatic icosahedral model (NIM). Our group was tasked with developing an innovative 3D viewing application for the purpose of displaying such global model data, which would be web-based, and intuitive to use as an outreach and diagnostic tool. What Is An Icosahedral Grid? The icosahedral grid [2] is created by recursively bisecting the 20 triangular faces of the original regular polyhedral (icosahedron) and projecting bisection points to the sphere. The number of recursive refinements is referred to as grid level. The number of grid points is defined by N = 10 * 22g + 2, where g is the grid level. The areas of grid points are the spherical Voronoi cells defined by the grid points (Figure 1). Figure 1: The icosahedral grid mesh composed of 10242 Voronoi cells (at grid refinement level 5). Viewing Global Icosahedral Grids There is a myriad of ways to display global model data, but we will only discuss a few here. One option is to use a plotting tool that renders an orthographic projection of the gridded data as a static image. This projection offers a natural view of a hemisphere from a given center point. Modelers typically create these types of plots when they need to debug a model or analyze specific grid points (see Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 State of Space Report
    2016 STATE OF SPACE REPORT A report by the Australian Government Space Coordination Committee space.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2016 Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia. Creative Commons licence Attribution CC BY All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, save for content supplied by third parties, logos, any material protected by trademark or otherwise noted in this publication, and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/. The full licence terms are available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode. Content contained herein should be attributed as The Australian Government State of Space Report 2016. This notice excludes the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, any logos and any material protected by trade mark or otherwise noted in the publication, from the application of the Creative Commons licence. These are all forms of property which the Commonwealth cannot or usually would not licence others to use. Disclaimer: The Australian Government as represented by the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science has exercised due care and skill in the preparation and compilation of the information and data in this publication. Notwithstanding, the Commonwealth of Australia, its officers, employees, or agents disclaim any liability, including liability for negligence, loss howsoever caused, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying upon any of the information or data in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law.
    [Show full text]
  • What3words Geocoding Extensions and Applications for a University Campus
    WHAT3WORDS GEOCODING EXTENSIONS AND APPLICATIONS FOR A UNIVERSITY CAMPUS WEN JIANG August 2018 TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 315 WHAT3WORDS GEOCODING EXTENSIONS AND APPLICATIONS FOR A UNIVERSITY CAMPUS Wen Jiang Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick P.O. Box 4400 Fredericton, N.B. Canada E3B 5A3 August 2018 © Wen Jiang, 2018 PREFACE This technical report is a reproduction of a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering in the Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, August 2018. The research was supervised by Dr. Emmanuel Stefanakis, and support was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. As with any copyrighted material, permission to reprint or quote extensively from this report must be received from the author. The citation to this work should appear as follows: Jiang, Wen (2018). What3Words Geocoding Extensions and Applications for a University Campus. M.Sc.E. thesis, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Technical Report No. 315, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, 116 pp. ABSTRACT Geocoded locations have become necessary in many GIS analysis, cartography and decision-making workflows. A reliable geocoding system that can effectively return any location on earth with sufficient accuracy is desired. This study is motivated by a need for a geocoding system to support university campus applications. To this end, the existing geocoding systems were examined. Address-based geocoding systems use address-matching method to retrieve geographic locations from postal addresses. They present limitations in locality coverage, input address standardization, and address database maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Web Worldwind Multidimensional Virtual Globe For
    The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLI-B2, 2016 XXIII ISPRS Congress, 12–19 July 2016, Prague, Czech Republic NASA WEBWORLDWIND: MULTIDIMENSIONAL VIRTUAL GLOBE FOR GEO BIG DATA VISUALIZATION M. A. Brovelli a, P. Hogan b, G. Prestifilippo a*, G. Zamboni a a Politecnico di Milano, DICA, Laboratorio di Geomatica, Como Campus, via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy - [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] b NASA Ames Research Center, M/S 244-14, Moffett Field, CA USA - [email protected] Commission II/ThS 12 - Location-based Social Media Data KEY WORDS: Virtual Globe, Data Visualization, Big geo-data, Web GIS, Multi-dimensional data, Social Media ABSTRACT: In this paper, we presented a web application created using the NASA WebWorldWind framework. The application is capable of visualizing n-dimensional data using a Voxel model. In this case study, we handled social media data and Call Detailed Records (CDR) of telecommunication networks. These were retrieved from the "BigData Challenge 2015" of Telecom Italia. We focused on the visualization process for a suitable way to show this geo-data in a 3D environment, incorporating more than three dimensions. This engenders an interactive way to browse the data in their real context and understand them quickly. Users will be able to handle several varieties of data, import their dataset using a particular data structure, and then mash them up in the WebWorldWind virtual globe. A broad range of public use this tool for diverse purposes is possible, without much experience in the field, thanks to the intuitive user-interface of this web app.
    [Show full text]