City of Oakland Design Guidelines for Bicycle Wayfinding Signage 7’ Minimum 10’ Typical

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

City of Oakland Design Guidelines for Bicycle Wayfinding Signage 7’ Minimum 10’ Typical City of Oakland Design Guidelines for Bicycle Wayfinding Signage 10’ typical 7’ minimum Confirmation Sign Turn Sign Decision Sign City of Oakland, Community & Economic Development Agency Transportation Services Division, Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities Program 250 Frank Ogawa Plaza, Suite 4344, Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 238-3983 | [email protected] | www.oaklandbikes.info July 2009 Design Guidelines for Bicycle Wayfinding Signage Background Action 1A.4 of the City of Oakland’s Bicycle Master Plan (2007) states, “Route Signage: Develop an informative and visible signage system for the bikeway network, building on existing bikeway signage, that includes directional and distance information to major destinations.” In Section 3.3, the Plan provides a discussion of the bicycle wayfinding signs that Oakland has used in the past. The following approach applies to all new bicycle wayfinding signage in the City of Oakland. Overall Approach Destination, direction, and distance information will be included on designated bikeways. Figure 1 provides a full list of supported destinations with guidance on how distances are measured. Figure 2 is a map of these destinations showing their distribution throughout the city. The destinations are organized into a hierarchy of three categories. Primary destinations are downtown and adjoining jurisdictions and are signed at distances of up to five miles. Secondary destinations are transit stations and districts and are signed at distances of up to two miles. Tertiary destinations include parks, landmarks, colleges, hospitals, and high schools. They are generally signed at distances up to one mile. Overall, the system supports approximately 100 destinations. Standard Signs for Bicycle Wayfinding The overall approach follows the look and feel of standard highway guide signs while the detailed design is tailored for bicyclists. The proposed guidelines use the following standard signs included in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and the California MUTCD: • D11-1: Bicycle Route Guide Sign • D1-1b: Destination Supplemental Sign • M7-1 to M7-7: Direction Arrow Supplemental Sign By using standard signage, the City of Oakland builds upon readily recognizable imagery and encourages consistency with other agencies. However, the proposed guidelines include specific modifications and additions to the standards to provide a wayfinding system that is more robust than the direction currently provided by state and national standards. Sign Types The system is composed of three sign types (Figure 3): Confirmation signs confirm that a cyclist is on a designated bikeway. Each confirmation sign includes a Bicycle Route Guide Sign (D11-1) and a Destination Supplemental Sign (D1-1b). Confirmation signs are located mid-block or on the far-side of intersections. Confirmation signs include destinations and their associated distances, but not directional arrows. Turn signs indicate where a bikeway turns from one street onto another street. (They are not used at the junction of intersecting bikeways.) Turn signs are located on the near-side of intersections. Each turn sign includes a Bicycle Route Guide Sign (D11-1) and the appropriate Direction Arrow Supplemental Sign (M7-1 to M7-7). Decision signs mark the junction of two or more bikeways. Decision signs are comprised of a Bicycle Route Guide Sign (D11-1) and a Destination Supplemental Sign (D1-1b). Decision signs are located on the near-side of intersections. They include destinations and their associated directional arrows, but not distances. Sign Placement Principles The following principles inform the placement of individual signs: 1. A confirmation sign will be located at the beginning of each bikeway. 2. When a bikeway turns, a turn sign will be located in advance of the turn (e.g., near-side of the intersection). 3. When bikeways intersect, a decision sign will be located on the near-side of each intersection approach. 4. To allow adequate notification of left turns, the decision or turn sign should be placed a distance before the intersection based on the number of lanes the bicyclist must merge across in order to make a legal left turn: a. Zero lane merge: 25’ b. One lane merge: 100’ c. Two lane merge: 200’ The decision or turn sign should always be located in the block immediately preceding the junction or turn. 4. Confirmation signs will be located at intervals of one-half mile to one mile, based on the density of streets and intersecting bikeways (e.g., downtown versus the Oakland Hills). It is desirable for confirmation signs to be located following decision signs on the far-side of intersections at the first convenient installation location. 4 Guidelines for Bicycle Wayfinding Signage, July 2009 5. Confirmation signs should be located immediately following bikeway junctions on streets that do not have bicycle lanes or sharrows (e.g., in the Oakland Hills). Sign Frequency In general, there will be four to five bikeway guide signs for each directional mile of bikeway. In other words, one mile of bikeway will include four to five bikeway guide signs in each direction. The proposed bikeway network includes bikeways spaced at intervals of one-half mile. On average, each directional mile of bikeway will include two decision signs. Confirmation signs at one-half mile to one mile intervals add an additional one to two signs per directional mile of bikeway. A typical bikeway will thus include three to four guide signs per directional mile, plus any turn signs that are needed based on the particular route. Assuming an average of four to five bikeway guide signs per directional mile, build-out of the proposed bikeway network will include approximately 2,000 bikeway guide signs. Sign Layout Principles The following principles determine the layout of individual signs. See Figures 4, 5, and 6 for sign layout details. Turn signs follow the details and dimensions specified in the MUTCD. Figure 7 shows the layout for all supported destination names. 1. The Bicycle Route Guide Sign (D11-1) is 24” wide and 18” tall. 2. The Destination Supplemental Signs (D1-1b) are 24” wide with the height determined by the number of destinations. 3. No more than three destinations are included on any single sign pole. 4. Destinations shall use mixed case letters (e.g. upper case and lower case). 5. The Destination Supplemental Signs (D1-1b) shall use the FHWA 2000 C series font with 2” cap height. 6. For long destination names that do not fit on one line, these approaches are used in the following order of preference: a. For destination names slightly longer than one line, compress the font horizontally to no less than 90% of its standard size. b. Use intuitive abbreviations in the destination name. c. Use a two-line entry for the destination name. 7. On decision signs, the straight destination shall be listed on top, the left destination in the middle, and the right destination on the bottom. 8. On decision signs, the straight arrow shall be placed to the left of a destination, the left arrow to the left of a destination, and the right arrow to the right of a destination. City of Oakland, California 5 9. On decision signs, straight destinations shall be left-justified, left destinations shall be left-justified, and right destinations shall be right-justified. The straight arrow shall be centered over the left arrow. 10. On confirmation signs, the closest destination shall be listed on top and the furthest destination shall be listed on the bottom. 11. If a bikeway ends in a location where there is no obvious destination, use the closest major destination on an intersecting bikeway. If there is no intuitive destination, the name of the intersecting street where the bikeway ends may be used as the destination. 12. The bikeway’s endpoint should be included on confirmation signs along the length of the route, irrespective of the distance associated with its designation as a primary, secondary, or tertiary destination. 13. Avoid the use of diagonal arrows on turn signs and decision signs wherever possible. 14. Do not use periods in the abbreviation of destination names (e.g. “Piedmont Ave” and “Jack London Sq”). 15. Common symbols are used to convey destination information in a space-efficient manner. The symbols shown below are used for “BART”, “hospital”, “East Bay Regional Park”, and “Amtrak”. The symbol shall precede the destination name (e.g. “ MacArthur” and “ Kaiser”). Logos/symbols used on decision/confirmation signs 6 Guidelines for Bicycle Wayfinding Signage, July 2009 Differences from the MUTCD Sign Layout Specifications These guidelines deviate from the MUTCD in the following ways: Difference Rationale Reduces horizontal buffer between edge Greater ability to accommodate longer of green and sign content from 1.5” to destination names 0.75” Incorporates symbols with destination Above plus improved communication names Aesthetic and consistent width allows for Maintains 24” wide supplemental sign the easy addition of destinations as the (D1-1b) bikeway network is built out Includes horizontal rules to separate Aesthetic and space-efficient multiple destinations Greater ability to accommodate longer Uses FHWA 2000 (Highway Gothic) C destination names; maintains 2” cap series font series (rather than D series) height; consistent with the cities of Chicago and Seattle Inclusion of City tree logo on D11-1 sign, by reducing cap height of “BIKE Provides local flavor and sense of place ROUTE” to 2.75” (from 3”) Replacement of “BIKE ROUTE” with Indicates to bicyclist that they are on the “Bay Trail” for use on Bay Trail segments Bay Trail Installation Specifications The standard pole for bikeway guide signs is a 2” square perforated unistrut pole. The pole should be placed 18” to 24” in the ground, depending upon the overall weight of the signs and the soil/pavement conditions. Heavy sign installations may require poles up to 36” into the ground.
Recommended publications
  • Draft Environmental Impact Report
    TABLE OF CONTENTS OAKLAND GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Page SUMMARY S-1 I. INTRODUCTION I-1 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION II-1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS III-A-1 AND MITIGATION MEASURES A. Land Use III.A-1 B. Transportation and Circulation III.B-1 C. Population, Housing, and Employment III.C-1 D. Public Services III.D-1 E. Air Quality III.E-1 F. Visual and Aesthetic Conditions III.F-1 G. Cultural and Historic Resources III.G-1 H. Vegetation and Wildlife III.H-1 I. Hydrology and Water Quality III.I-1 J. Energy III.J-1 K. Geology and Seismicity III.K-1 L. Noise III.L-1 M. Hazardous Materials III.M-1 N. Wind III.N-1 O. Consistency with Adopted Plans and Policies III.O-1 IV. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS IV-1 V. IMPACT OVERVIEW V-1 VI. REPORT PREPARERS VI-1 APPENDICES 1. Notice of Preparation and Initial Study 1-1 2. Hazardous Materials Supporting Documentation 2-1 Oakland General Plan Land Use and Transportation Element EIR ii Environmental Science Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES S-1 Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures S-2 II-1 Households, Population, and Employment, 1995 and 2015 II-7 II-2 Household and Job Growth in the City’s Twelve Planning Areas, 1995-2015 II-8 II-3 General Plan Goals II-10 II-4 Correlation Between Proposed and Existing Land Use Categories II-16 II-5 Projects Within the Downtown Showcase District II-20 II-6 Projects Within the Coliseum Showcase District II-21 II-7 Major Land Use Diagram Change Areas II-24 II-8 Acreage in Proposed Land
    [Show full text]
  • List Service Groups 1 and 2 Addendum 3
    Request for Proposal for Zero Waste Services Service Groups 1 and 2 City Facilities ‐ List Addendum 3 Facility Name Facility Address ALLENDALE RECREATION CENTER 3711 SUTER ST ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 1101 29TH AVE ARROYO COMMUNITY GARDEN 79TH AVE CUL‐DE‐SAC AND ARROYO TENNIS COURTS 8006 PLYMOUTH ST ARROYO VIEJO RECREATION CENTER 7701 KRAUSE AVE BROOKDALE RECREATION CENTER 2535 HIGH ST BURKHALTER TENNIS COURT 3923 COLUMBIAN DR BUSHROD RECREATION CENTER 560 59TH ST CALDECOT FIELD 6900 BROADWAY CARMEN FLORES RECREATION CTR 1637 FRUITVALE AVE CARTER GILMORE FIELD 1390 66TH AVE CHABOT FIELD 6850 CHABOT RD CHABOT TENNIS COURT 6884 CHABOT RD CITY HALL 1 FRANK H OGAWA PLAZA CITY STABLES 13560 SKYLINE BLVD CLINTON PARK 655 INTERNATIONAL BLVD COLUMBIA GARDENS PARK (ENTERPRISE) 9854 KOFORD RD COMMUNITY GARDEN 876 47TH ST COMMUNITY GARDEN PROGRAM 1700 MARKET ST CONCORDIA RECREATION CENTER 2901 64TH AVE CURT FLOOD FIELD PARK 3200 BOSTON AVE DALZIEL BUILDING 250 FRANK H OGAWA PLAZA DAVIE TENNIS STADIUM 198 OAK RD, PIEDMONT DEFREMERY POOL 1269 18TH ST DEFREMERY REC CENTER 1651 ADELINE ST DEFREMERY TENNIS COURT 1239 18TH ST DIMOND PARK & REC CENTER 3860 HANLY RD DIMOND TENNIS COURT 3743 FRUITVALE AVE DOWNTOWN OAKLAND SENIOR CENTER 200 GRAND AVE DUNMUIR HOUSE 2960 PERALTA OAKS CT EAST OAKLAND SPORTS CENTER (STORED/SHARED WITH IRA JINKINS REC. C9161 EDES AVE EASTMONT POLICE SUBSTATION 2651 73RD AVE ESTUARY PARK (BOAT LAUNCH) (Park) 107 EMBARCADERO EAST F M SMITH RECREATION CTR 1969 PARK BLVD FAIRYLAND 245 GRAND AVE FAIRYLAND 699 BELLEVUE AVE FIRE ADMINISTRATION
    [Show full text]
  • City of Oakland Design Guidelines for Bicycle Wayfinding Signage
    City of Oakland Design Guidelines for Bicycle Wayfinding Signage Confirmation Sign Turn Sign Decision Sign City of Oakland, Department of Transportation Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities Program 250 Frank Ogawa Plaza, Suite 4344, Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 238-3983 | [email protected] | www.oaklandbikes.info September 2017 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Standard Signs for Bicycle Wayfinding .............................................................................................. 3 Sign Assembly Types ............................................................................................................................ 3 Sign Placement Principles .................................................................................................................... 4 Sign Frequency ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Sign Layout Principles .......................................................................................................................... 5 Logos/Symbols Used on Decision & Confirmation Signs ............................................................ 7 Differences From the MUTCD Sign Layout Specifications .......................................................... 7 Sign Messaging Principles ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uniquely Oakland San Francisco Business Times
    SPECIAL ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT SEPTEMBER 6, 2019 Uniquely OaklandOpportunities shine in California’s most inclusive and innovative city 2 ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT UNIQUELY OAKLAND SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES Welcome to Mandela Station MANDELA STATION @WEST OAKLAND BART A Culture-Rich Transit Oriented Development 7TH ST T2 T1 Located at the 5.5-acre West Oakland Bart Station Site T3 T4 5TH ST A Centrally Located 750 Residential Units Opportunity Zone Project (approx. 240 units below market-rate) 500,000 sq.ft. of Class A oce space Only 7 minutes from Downtown San Francisco (via BART) 75,000 sq.ft. of quality retail Over 400 parking stalls Only 4 minutes to Downtown PROJ. # 168-153 WO BART Oakland (via BART) DATE: April 30, 2019 SHEET: A Regional Community...Connected JRDV ARCHITECTS INC. COPYRIGHT C 2015. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. We’re on the Edge - and taking transit oriented living to the next level. www.westoaklandstation.com #WOSTATION [email protected] 中国港湾工程有限 公司 Strategic Urban Development Alliance, LLC China Harbour Engineering Company Ltd. suda SEPTEMBER 6, 2019 UNIQUELY OAKLAND ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT 3 ‹ A LETTER FROM THE MAYOR OF OAKLAND › Uniquely Oakland Everyone belongs in the world’s best city for smart businesses, large or small elcome to Oakland, Calif., the best place ment dollars are pouring in, driving construction on the planet to pursue prosperity. on 240,000 square feet of new retail space and W If that seems like exaggeration, 945,000 square feet of new office space with consider this: Oakland is ideally located at the openings slated for 2019, 2020 and 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Oakland
    Mapping Small Arts & Culture Organizations of Color in Oakland A benchmark project that will encourage funders to adopt intentional investment strategies to support the longterm stability of this sector. Contents 1. Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 4 Key Findings ...................................................................................................................... 4 Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 4 2. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 5 Why This Project? .............................................................................................................. 5 Racial Equity in Arts Philanthropy ....................................................................................... 6 Art and Cultural Practice as Tools for Social Change ............................................................ 8 3. Methodology .................................................................................................................... 10 Data Limitations ............................................................................................................... 10 Sector Overview ............................................................................................................... 11 4. Key Findings ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivating the Commons an Assessment of the Potential For
    Portland State University PDXScholar Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications Urban Studies and Planning and Presentations 12-2010 Cultivating the Commons An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land Nathan McClintock Portland State University, [email protected] Jenny Cooper University of California - Berkeley Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac Part of the Social Policy Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation McClintock, N., and Cooper, J. (2010). Cultivating the Commons An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land. Available at www.urbanfood.org. This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cultivating the Commons An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land by Nathan McClintock & Jenny Cooper Department of Geography University of California, Berkeley REVISED EDITION – December 2010 ! i Cultivating the Commons An Assessment of the Potential for Urban Agriculture on Oakland’s Public Land Nathan McClintock & Jenny Cooper Department of Geography, University of California, Berkeley October 2009, revised December 2010 In collaboration with: City Slicker Farms HOPE Collaborative Institute for Food & Development Policy (Food First) This project was funded in part by the HOPE Collaborative. City Slicker Farms was the fiscal sponsor. Food First published print copies of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (PRAC)
    PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION - PRAC Wednesday, September 12, 2018 Lakeside Park Garden Center – 666 Bellevue Avenue Draft Minutes 1. CALL TO ORDER: 4:34p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: AIKENS, COLE, CORBIN, HA, HOWZE, KADERA-REDMOND, MOORE, NORMAN, REILLY, TORRES, WOLFSON Present: 7 – Aikens, Cole, Corbin, Kadera-Redmond, Moore, Norman, Reilly Excused: 4 – Ha, Howze, Torres, Wolfson Staff: Parks and Recreation - Director Nicholas Williams, Dana Riley, Desmona Armstrong, Zermaine Thomas (Acting Recording Secretary) 3. DISPOSITON OF MINUTES: A. June 13, 2018 Draft Minutes Motion: Commissioner Cole entertained a motion to approve the Disposition of Draft Minutes for June 13, 2018. Second by: Commissioner Corbin Vote: 7 Yes: Aikens, Cole, Corbin, Kadera-Redmond, Moore, Norman, Reilly Motion: Passed B. July 11, 2018 Draft Minutes Note: Insufficient quorum to make a motion to approve the July 11, 2018 draft meeting minutes. 4. MODIFICATIONS TO THE AGENDA: N/A 5. OPEN FORUM: 12 Speakers spoke during Open Forum • Sean Maher: City of Oakland, Capital Improvement Program Update • Donald Bordenave: Black & Veatch for Extenet System: Small Cell Sites around Lake Merritt • Lisa Hire: Friends of the Oakland Municipal Band Update on Summer Concerts at Edoff Memorial Bandstand • Susan Pierpoint: North Oakland Village would like to incorporate a Senior Playground. • Katie Noonan & Miriam Valesco: Rotary Nature Center supporters providing updates on the process. 1 • 7 speakers for Pickleball requesting a park in Oakland that will accommodate the fast-growing sport. 6. CONSENT NEW BUSINESS: A. REQUEST APPROVAL FROM THE PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION TO GRANT PERMISSION TO ALLOW THE AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION (AFSP) TO COLLECT ON SITE CHARITABLE DONATIONS AT THIER OUT OF THE DARKNESS WALK AT LAKESIDE PARK PERGOLA ON SATURDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2018, FROM 6:00AM – 10:00AM.
    [Show full text]
  • South and West Berkeley Central and East Oakland
    Final S OUTH AND WEST BCERKELEYENTRAL AND EAST OAKLAND COMMUNITY-BASED T RANSPORTATION PLAN Alameda County Congestion Management Agency December, 2007 DESIGN, COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT Final C ENTRAL AND EAST OAKLAND COMMUNITY BASED T RANSPORTATION PLAN Submitted to Alameda County Congestion Management Agency December, 2007 DESIGN, COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT 1625 SHATTUCK AVENUE, SUITE 300 TEL: 510 848 3815 BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94709 FAX: 510 848 4315 in association with Nelson\Nygaard Consulting TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................. 1-1 2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 2-1 3. EXISTING LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS................................................... 3-1 4. EXISTING TRANSPORTATION NETWORK AND GAPS...................................... 4-1 5. COMMUNITY OUTREACH ........................................................................... 5-1 6. STRATEGIES ............................................................................................... 6-1 7. FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................ 7-1 Appendices Appendix A: AC Transit Service Changes Appendix B: Workshop Summary Appendix C: Survey Instrument i ALAMEDA COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT AGENCY CENTRAL AND EAST OAKLAND COMMUNITY-BASED TRANSPORTATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures Figure 3-1 Central and East Oakland Project Area .................................. 3-2
    [Show full text]
  • Wayfinding Program Description
    Uptown Wayfinding Sign Program Description December 2014 DISCOVER St. 580 27th GREATNEIGHBORHOODS Street 26th O Broadway AIRPORT R Waverly Street St. D « « e 25th Street Main strip: Hegenberger Rd. Who you’ll fi nd walking around: Athletes, pilots, in-transit Sycamor VALDEZ N Valdez Street A Neighborhood giant: Oakland International Airport (OAK) and the Oracle Arena & O.co Coliseum NORTH Webster Street E 98th Ave. 98th complex « Best airport meal: A mini version of Heinold’s First and Last Chance Saloon in Terminal 1 L 25th St. th Street ADAMS POINTD Ave. 85th 24 N YMCA Harrison Street AIRPORTInternational Blvd.N A S KONO CHINATOWN K 24th St. Grand Avenue Main strip: 8th Street (near Webster) « Main architecture: California bungalows built in the early 20th A Quality Inn & San Jose The Comfort Inn Silicon Valley Motel 6 « « reet O century Neighborhood giant: Pacifi c Renaissance Plaza Well-known residents: Amy Tan, Bruce 23rd St Grand AvenueCathedral of Christ 880 Lee « Where to mingle with locals: Madison Park, Pacifi c Renaissance Plaza, Restaurant Peony the Light La Quinta Inn Hegenberger Expy. Hegenberger Davis St. Davis UPTOWN Telegraph Lake Merri Children’s San Leandro St. Wildlife Sanctuary Main strip: Broadway and Telegraph Days Hotel Enterprise Way. Best Western Ordway Fairyland Edes Ave. KE CHABOT (between 17th and 25th streets) « Bldg DIAMONDDISTRICT Coliseum/ Oakland Airport Main strip: Fruitvale Avenue (at MacArthur) « Architecture: 1920s bungalows, Mission Revivals « Main architecture: Early to mid 1900s, Ave. 66th W. Grand « with loads of Art Deco masterpieces Street Marrio Neighborhood giant: Dimond Canyon and Sausal Creek Best Salvadorian pupusa: Tamales Mi Lupita 21st .
    [Show full text]
  • City Administrator's Weekly Report for July 21, 2017
    DISTRIBUTION DATE: July 21, 2017 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & FROM: Sabrina B. Landreth CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: City Administrator’s Weekly Report DATE: July 21, 2017 _______ INFORMATION Following are the key activities to be highlighted this week: National Night Out Registration Deadline – Deadline is Friday, July 14 for neighborhood and community groups to register to be a host for the annual National Night Out event being held on Tuesday, August 1, from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. Sponsored by the National Association of Town Watch, National Night Out is America’s night out and a time for neighbors to get together and have a block party, ice cream social, potluck or other outdoor event to build neighborhood spirit and unity. These efforts are a first defense against crime. Block parties can be hosted anywhere including townhouse complexes, apartment buildings or even in a park near a condominium. Caution tape may be provided upon request at registration and streets will be blocked off at no-cost. For more information or to register, please visit www.oaklandnet.com/nno or call (510) 238-3102. OPR Race To Fundraise, Charities Win – On Friday, July 14, Oakland Parks & Recreation (OPR) launched its first annual adult big wheel event, Big Wheel Race To Fundraise located on the brick “trackway” in front of the Dalziel Building located at 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza. The competition was fierce and city staff let the pedal hit the metal. The quick starts and deafening cheers had every racer going the distance. The sprint to cross the finish-line first was for a good cause indeed - to donate to a favorite charity and to support OPR youth development programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Parks & Recreation
    510.238.7275 • www.oaklandnet.com/parks 1 Director’s Welcome Audree V. Jones-Taylor; Director, Office of Parks and Recreation Thank you Oakland! As you know, OPR is not just about children and youth. We service An open letter to the family, friends, families and you, the adults. Last year, we served over 30,000 neighbors, residents and visitors of OPR. adults through our Sundays in the Redwoods Concert Series, plays, adult sports leagues, East Oakland Sports Center and more! 2012 was a great year for the Office of Parks and Recreation (OPR). In spite In addition to new programming, OPR kept busy teaming up with of many challenges, we successfully various agencies allowing us to receive funding and complete served over 64,543 program customers. projects, which in turn increase your property value and support As we prepare to move forward with our continued mission to provide a safe and clean environment our 2013 programs, I wanted to take the time to reflect on our for your enjoyment. We were able to work along with the Public 2012 accomplishments made possible by your commitment, Works Agency to complete the installation of remote lighting involvement and support of OPR. Whether by financial controls for energy efficiencies at 14 sites; renovate six basketball contributions, writing letters on our behalf, enrolling in programs, courts; upgrade the Morcom Rose Garden and the Lake Merritt or renting our facilities, each of you contributed to our success. Bird Islands, and complete four ball fields. This was made possible Thank you all! through partnerships with: Community Development Block Grants, Prop 40, Measure WW, the American Recovery and Reinvestment • OPR’s boating programs provided Oakland youth with Act, Raiders NFL Play 60, Kaiser Foundation, Good Tidings, the scholarships valued at $14,920 allowing them to participate in National Recreation and Park Association, Sprite, the Stewardship week-long boating camps and after school programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Description
    Chapter 2 Project Description 2.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes objectives and key components of the VMP, including specific treatment projects, vegetation techniques, necessary equipment, and the general timeline for implementing proposed treatment projects. The Executive Summary of the Draft VMP is provided in Appendix A, Draft Vegetation Management Plan, of this DEIR; the complete Draft VMP can be viewed at the following link: www.oaklandvegmanagement.org/wp- content/uploads/2019/11/Oakland-VMP_Revised-Draft_NOV-1-2019.pdf.VMP Area The VMP area encompasses City-owned parcels and areas within 30 feet of the edge of roadsides located within the City’s Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ), as designated by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) and defined in Section 4904.3 of the Oakland Fire Code (Oakland Municipal Code Chapter 15.12). Specifically, as shown in Figure 2-1, the VMP area includes 419 City-owned parcels, ranging in size from <0.1 acre to 235 acres and totaling 1,924 acres. For VMP planning purposes, parcels have been divided into the following categories: urban and residential, canyon areas, ridgetop areas, City park lands and open space, other areas, and road medians. The VMP also includes roadside areas along 308 miles of road within the City’s VHFHSZ, including surface and arterial streets, State Routes (SRs) 13 and 24, and Interstate 580 (I-580). Table 2-1 summarizes the categories, sizes, and quantities of City-owned parcels in the VMP area. Table 2-1. City-owned Parcels within the VMP Area Parcel Category Quantity Total Acreage Urban and Residential 152 51.2 Canyon Areas 89 188.7 Ridgetop Areas 11 130.2 City Park Lands and Open Space 91 1,552.9 Other Areas* 43 24.5 Medians 33 6.1 Total: 419 1,923.6 * Other areas are developed City-owned properties in the VMP area that include fire stations (nos.
    [Show full text]