A Tribute to Vernon Ahmadjian (19 May 1930–13 March 2012)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Tribute to Vernon Ahmadjian (19 May 1930–13 March 2012) The Lichenologist 45(2): 133–136 (2013) 6 British Lichen Society, 2013 doi:10.1017/S0024282912000795 A tribute to Vernon Ahmadjian (19 May 1930–13 March 2012) Dr Vernon Ahmadjian was the first person to sity, Massachusetts, he served two years on develop consistently successful techniques military service with the US Army Combat for the laboratory synthesis of a variety of dif- Medical Corps in Korea. He returned to ferent lichen species from their isolated algal Clark University, obtaining an M.A. in 1956. and fungal components. His research led to A key event for him was meeting the lichenol- some penetrating discoveries concerning the ogist I. MacKenzie Lamb on a marine botany factors that regulate the early development of course in the summer of 1955. Lamb, then lichens. Director of the Farlow Herbarium at Harvard The son of Armenian immigrants to the University, was taking the course in order to USA, Ahmadjian was born and raised in better curate and enlarge the Farlow collec- Whitinsville, Massachusetts, and lived most tions. Their common keen interest in lichens of his life in Worcester, Massachusetts. After led to Ahmadjian becoming Lamb’s first obtaining a B.A. in 1952 from Clark Univer- Ph.D. student at Harvard. Lamb taught him Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.219, on 26 Sep 2021 at 00:52:48, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282912000795 134 THE LICHENOLOGIST Vol. 45 Ware´n’s micropipette technique for isolating the initial stages were often observed, these lichen symbionts into laboratory culture, and mostly died off or proceeded no further. He introduced him to the unknowns of phyco- concluded that the methodological difficulties biont taxonomy, on which Ahmadjian was were so great that his objectives could only also later to become one of the world’s lead- be realised to a very small degree. ing experts. Most importantly, Lamb passed This was the situation confronting Ahmad- on his own fascination with the experimental jian when his experimental work on lichen synthesis of lichens and the difficulties in synthesis began in the late1950s. His success achieving it to Ahmadjian, and this became was due to his early appreciation of the im- one of his key lifelong interests. After obtain- portance for the initiation of a lichen synthe- ing his Ph. D. at Harvard, he held brief posts sis that the level of available nutrients should at the University of Massachusetts and the Uni- be low (if symbionts are inoculated together versity of California, Berkeley, before returning on nutrient-rich agar they show no tendency to Clark University where he spent most of to associate and grow quite independently). the rest of his career researching lichens. Synthesis progresses further if the cultures At that time, there were confusing reports are subjected to slow, alternate periods of on attempts at the laboratory synthesis of li- wetting and drying. Even better results are chens. A decade or so after it was discovered obtained if more natural substrata such as in the 1860s that a lichen was composed of rock, wood or soil are used instead of agar. two separate organisms, the French biologist Ahmadjian described how the laboratory Gaston Bonnier reported the successful arti- synthesis of Cladonia cristatella proceeded in ficial synthesis of quite a number of lichens the following stages. First, the hyphae en- from their component algal and fungal sym- circle the symbiont – a non-specific stage bionts; he used small stones or pieces of since they would encircle in a similar manner bark hung over water in a current of sterilised a variety of non-symbiotic algae and even air. However, all subsequent attempts by glass beads of a similar size. Secondly, the various scientists to repeat these experiments hyphae branch and continue to envelop sym- failed, and Bonnier’s work became the target bionts to form soredia; the symbionts be- of criticism and doubt. Thus, the Dutch li- come surrounded by a gelatinous matrix of chenologist Quispel, in his classic 1943 re- fungal origin and penetration of them by view of the mutual relations between algae fungal haustoria commences. Thirdly, tissue and fungi in lichens, wrote of Bonnier: ‘‘. he differentiation by the fungus into cortex and was the only investigator who pretended to have medulla begins, with the algal symbionts synthesised these lichens in pure culture . ’’. confined to a distinct layer. Fourthly, in a Quispelnotedthatallthosescientistswhohad few samples, synthesis proceeds as far as the attempted such synthesis could at best only formation of podetia and the initiation of occasionally obtain the very beginnings of a fungal fruit bodies. Furthermore, transport thallus and no lichen was formed. The Swiss of products of photosynthesis from algal to lichenologist E. A. Thomas imputed the fail- fungal symbionts commenced at about 12 ure of many attempts at synthesis to the use weeks after their first contact. of the wrong substrata with overly high con- Ahmadjian also made extensive studies tents of water and/or of food substances. of the phycobionts of lichens, especially the Thomas developed a technique involving the various species of Trebouxia and Pseudotre- partial insertion of pieces of wood into 1% bouxia. Identical phycobionts were isolated Knop agar inside flasks, and then inoculating from widely different lichen species, indicat- those parts not submerged in the agar with ing that algae are not specific to particular pure cultures of fungus and alga. In only one mycobionts. In a study of the specificity of of the 800 flasks used in these experiments the fungus Cladonia cristatella for its Tre- was a successful complete synthesis observed. bouxia symbionts, for example, he found Quispel himself made numerous attempts at that of nine Trebouxia spp. inoculated with the laboratory synthesis of lichens: although the fungus, three were killed, but four pro- Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.219, on 26 Sep 2021 at 00:52:48, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282912000795 2013 A tribute to Vernon Ahmadjian 135 ceeded as far as thallus formation. However, in 1986, together with Surindar Paracer, he no association was initiated with any of published a more general text, Symbiosis. An 12 Pseudotrebouxia spp. He considered the Introduction to Biological Associations,asecond added problem that Trebouxia spp. are ap- edition appearing in 2000. parently rare in the free-living state. This Sadly, opportunities to meet up with Vernon raised the question of how lichens which do Ahmadjian have been all too few, but on those not form symbiotic propagules such as sore- occasions when each of us did have the plea- dia but only have fungal fruit bodies re- sure of his company they were both memora- produce in nature. With his co-workers, he ble and illuminating. Like us, those who have observed zoosporogenesis in the Trebouxia dealt with him over the years have deeply gelatinosa symbiont of Parmelia (Xantho- appreciated his thoughtfulness, courtesy and parmelia) conspersa. These observations sug- generosity, and can testify to his outstanding gested that zoospores may be released within and unique contributions to our understand- the thallus, escaping to form free-living micro- ing of lichens. colonies. These colonies could potentially then unite with spores from the same or Selected Publications genetically different mycobionts. Such natural Over 90 lichenological and phycological papers and resyntheses could be the cause for the ob- books are attributed to Vernon Ahmadjian, some of the served heterogeneity characterizing the fungi more notable being: of many lichen populations. Ahmadjian, V. (1958) A guide for the identification Ahmadjian’s interests were not confined of algae occurring as lichen symbionts. Botaniska to the laboratory. He knew where the rare Notiser 111: 632–644. lichens grew in his county in Massachusetts, Ahmadjian, V. (1959) A contribution toward lichen syn- thesis. Mycologia 51: 56–60. and campaigned to have these locations pro- Ahmadjian, V. (1960) The lichen association. Bryologist tected from development. In 1967 the Na- 63: 250–254. tional Science Foundation awarded him the Ahmadjian, V. (1961) Studies on lichenized fungi. Antarctic Medal for his work on lichens at Bryologist 64: 168–179. the McMurdo station in Antarctica, and an- Ahmadjian, V. (1962) Investigations on lichen synthesis. American Journal of Botany 49: 277–283. nounced that an ice-covered, 2900 m peak in Ahmadjian, V. (1966) Artificial reestablishment of the the Queen Alexandra Range of the Transan- lichen Cladonia cristatella. Science 15: 199–201. tarctic had been named ‘Ahmadjian Peak’ in Ahmadjian, V. (1966) Cultural and physiological aspects his honour. He was the first co-editor with of the lichen symbiosis. In Plant Biology Today. Ad- vances and Challenges 2nd ed. (W. A. Jensen & L. G. Ernie Brodo (1967–1974) of the Interna- Kavaljian, eds): 148–163. Belmont, California: Wads- tional Lichenological Newsletter, and in 1996, worth Publishing. for his lifetime achievements in lichenology, Ahmadjian, V. (1966) Lichens. In Symbiosis, Volume 1. particularly for his pioneering research, he (S. M. Henry, ed.): 35–97. New York: Academic was awarded the Acharius Medal. Nor were Press. Ahmadjian, V. (1967) The Lichen Symbiosis. Waltham, his botanical interests and achievements con- Mass.: Blaisdell Publishing. fined to lichenology: he was a champion for Ahmadjian, V. (1967) A guide to the algae occurring as his local natural plant communities and a lichen symbionts: isolation, culture, cultural physi- member of the Tower Hill Botanic Garden ology, and identification. Phycologia 6: 127–160. Ahmadjian, V. (1970) The lichen symbiosis: its origin in Boylston, and in 1979 published a book and evolution.
Recommended publications
  • The Early Years
    Lichenological Contributions in Honour of David Galloway. I. Kärnefelt & A. Thell (eds.): Bibliotheca Lichenologica 95: 75–100. J. Cramer in der Gebrüder Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Berlin · Stuttgart, 2007. International Association for Lichenology: the early years Ingvar KÄRNEFELT & Arne THELL The Biological Museums, Lund University, Östra Vallgatan 18, SE-223 61 Lund, Sweden; e-mail: [email protected]; Arne.Thell@ botmus.lu.se One of the main purposes of the International Association for Lichenology (IAL), inaugurated in 1967, was to establish a Newsletter in order to provide a forum for lichenologists worldwide to communicate with each other. In consequence, the early history of the IAL is in large degree the story of the International Lichenological Newsletter (ILN). Those responsible for organising the IAL at this time were essentially the editors of the Newsletter, hard-working people, collating hundreds of short notes on lichenologists and their current projects and opinions from all over the world, as well as reports of meetings and social events. Although the possibilities of communication have increased enormously in recent years, the function of IAL and its Newsletter remain the same, and the initial enthusiasm for exchanging ideas and results and reporting meetings continues undiminished. Meetings before IAL International botanical congresses have a long history dating back to the 1860s (VERDOORN 1953). Although lichenologists presumably attended these early meetings, any such participation is poorly documented. Alexander Zahlbruckner, for instance, was one of the main organizers of the 2nd International Botanical Congress (IBC) in Vienna in 1905. During the 7th IBC in Stockholm in 1950, a number of lichenologists joined together to give lectures on lichens which, according to the proceedings, included most aspects of lichen biology (OSVALD & ÅBERG 1953).
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, a XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    INFORMATION TO USERS This dissertation was produced from a microfilm copy of the original d o c u m e n t While the most advanced technological means to photograph and r e p ro d u c e this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the q u a l i t y of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you u n d e rstan d markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the d o c u m e n t photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to o b t a i n the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film a l o n g with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an im a g e and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large r o u n d black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected -t h a t the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image o f the page in the adjacent; frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the m a te r ia l being photographed the photographer followed a definite m e t h o d in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue p h o to in g from left to right in equal sections w ith a small overlap.
    [Show full text]
  • Ivan Mackenzie Lamb (Elke Mackenzie) (1911-1990)
    Lichenologist 23(1): 85-87 (1991) OBITUARY IVAN MACKENZIE LAMB (ELKE MACKENZIE) (1911-1990) Ivan Mackenzie Lamb, who died on January 27, 1990, made significant contributions to lichenology. Unfortunately, the project for which he will be remembered most, a world-wide monograph of the genus Stereocaulon, was not fully realized for economic reasons. The results of 30 years of meticulous field and herbaria study of Stereocaulon were published in an abridged form, with- out the beautiful specimen drawings that he had commissioned from pro- fessional artists, in the Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory in 1977. A year later, in the same journal, Lamb published his keys to the species of Stereocaulon. Despite his keen disappointment in not being able to publish a complete monograph, both of these papers will be the standard reference works of this genus for many years. Exsiccate material, which Lamb had so carefully collected together with his original drawings of Stereocaulon species, were lost through mildew and fire during his stay in Costa Rica. 0024-2829/91/010085 + 03 $03.00/0 © 1991 The British Lichen Society Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.22, on 29 Sep 2021 at 08:23:45, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282991000142 86 THE LICHENOLOGIST Vol.23 Lamb was born in London on 10 September 1911 and received his B.Sc. (1933) and D.Sc. (1943) degrees from Edinburgh University. His thesis was a monograph of the lichen genus Placopsis.
    [Show full text]