EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Community-Based Forest Management Program (CBFMP) revolutionized forest development and rehabilitation efforts of the government when it was institutionalized in 1995 by virtue of Executive Order No. 263.

Before the adoption of the CBFM approach, the sole motivating factor of contract reforestation awardees was primarily financial gains. With the implementation of the Forestry Sector Project (FSP) using CBFM as its main strategy to rehabilitate the upland ecosystem, it empowered beneficiary communities economically, socially, technically and politically while transforming them into environmentally responsible managers. The tenurial right to develop subproject sites alongside the various inputs from the Subproject deepened their commitment to collaborate with other stakeholders in the implementation of these subprojects.

The Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject is in Zamboanga del Sur and covers 11 barangays within the Municipality of Bayog. Sibugay River which is responsible for irrigating farmlands of Sibugay Province and Zamboanga del Sur is also within the Subproject site.

The implementation of the Comprehensive Site Development (CSD) activities stands out among other components as it manifests the People’s Organization’s zeal and commitment to go beyond targets and work for the success of the Project. From the original target of 2,020 hectares, the Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association, Inc. (BAWARSA, Inc.) was able to develop a total area of 2,164.09 hectares or an excess of 144.09 hectares without the benefit of any additional budget for nursery and plantation establishment. For this achievement, an expansion area was granted to BAWARSA Inc. covering an additional six barangays with a total area of 2,520 hectares. This, too had been exceeded as revealed in the final validation showing an excess of 20 hectares to make the overall accomplishment of 2,540 hectares.

Involvement in CSD activities spelled jobs for members of the communities as it generated 404, 601 man days as compared to a mere 186, 045 man days before the Project was implemented.

On the other hand, some PHP 2,214 million was generated by BAWARSA Inc. for its Capital Build-up/Community Forest Development Funds from which financing of three livelihood projects were drawn. In terms of income, employment opportunities as well as involvement in livelihood opportunities raised the annual average household income of the community from PHP 42,000.00 before the project to PHP 68,400.00 after the project or an increase of about 63%.

The farm-to-market road and the hanging bridge on the other hand support the livelihood projects as they facilitate ease in mobility and transport of livelihood products to places of commerce.

The success of the Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject has become a household word not only in Zamboanga del Sur but in the entire Region 9 for the financial and environmental improvement it has wrought on the people and the ecosystem. TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ------i

I. Subproject Description ------1 1. Purpose/ Objectives A. Original B. Modifications 2. Subproject Scope and Dimension A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope and Dimensions B. Reasons for Revision/ Modification Of Scope and Dimensions C. Contribution of Subproject to Relevant (Sub) Sectors

II. Subproject Implementation ------14 1. Organizations for Implementing Subproject 2. Implementation Period 3. Subproject Cost 4. Comments on Performance of AO, AP, PO, M&E, and Infra Contractors 5. Other Matters Relating to Subproject Implementation

III. Action taken by the AO, AP, and PO ------26 Relating to Recommendation(s)

IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance Of the Subproject Facilities ------26 1. Present Condition of Facilities 2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance 3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure For Operation and Maintenance (by year) 4. Maintenance Method

V. Benefits Derived from the Project ------35 1. Indirect Effects

VI. Conclusions and Recommendations ------37

LIST OF TABLES:

Table 1 : Trainings Attended by the PO ------38

Table 2 : Subproject Performance ------39

Table 3 : Subproject Site Management Office Equipments ------40

Table 4 : Trainings Attended by the SUSIMO ------41

Table 5 : Consumer Store and Rice Trading Livelihood Project ------42

Table 5a : Trucking (Service/Hire) Livelihood Project ------43

Table 6 : Subproject Status Report ------44

Table 7 : SMP Cost Estimate per Hectare per activity ------45

Table 8 : Cost Estimate for Community Organizing per activity ------46

Table 9a : Agroforestry Cost Estimate per Activity ------47

Table 9b : Cost Estimate for Bamboo Plantation per Activity ------48

Table 9c : Rattan Plantation Cost Estimate per Activity ------49

Table 9d: Cost Estimate for Tree Plantation per Activity ------50

Table 10 : Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate per activity ------51

Table 11 : Infrastructure Project ------52

Table 12 : Annual Work and Financial Plan ------53

ANNEXES:

1. Organizational Structure ------57

1a. SMP 1b1-1b2. CO 1c. PO 1d1-1d2-1d3. M & E Contractor 1e. SUSIMO 1f. Infrastructure 2. Pictures ------66

3. CSD Accomplishment Map ------68

SUBPROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

Of

Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject

Forestry Sector Project Loan Agreement No. PH-P 135

I. Subproject Description

The Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject is located in the Municipality of Bayog, Province of Zamboanga del Sur. It is geographically situated at 123o 02’ 36.60” to 123o 07’ 2.50” east longitude and 7o 50’ 34.96” to 7o 55’ 18.40” north latitude and falls within the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) No. 86700 – 87600 north and UTM No. 50400 – 51300 east. The Subproject is bounded on the north by the Municipality of Sindangan,1 Province of Zamboanga del Norte, on the east by the Municipality of Kumalarang and Lakewood, on the south by the Municipality of Buug, and on the west by the Municipality of Diplahan, Siay and Kabasalan, all of Zamboanga Sibugay. With an approved area of 2,520 hectares for Comprehensive Site Development (CSD), accomplishment reached 2,540 hectares covering 11 barangays: Poblacion, Kahayagan, Balumbunan, Depase, Matun-og, Kanipaan, Baking, Conacon, Datagan, Camp Blessing and Dagum.

The major access to the Subproject site is through the provincial road connecting the Municipality of Bayog to the nearby municipalities. This road system connects Barangay Depase, Poblacion, and Kahayagan where some portions of the Subproject site are located. The main portion of the Subproject can be reached through a footbridge from Barangays Kahayagan and Supon. The other portions of the Subproject within Barangay Balumbunan, Matun-og, Dagum, Camp Blessing, Kanipaan, Conacon and Baking are accessible through hiking or horse ride from Barangay Supon across the Sibuguey river.

The Subproject is part of the public domain and declared as timberland under the government’s legal classification status. A Community-Based Forest Management Agreement (CBFMA) covering a total area of 3,326.53 hectares was awarded to the Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association (BAWARSA) Inc. on April 02, 2003.

1 1. Purpose/Objectives

A) Original (at the time of appraisal)

a. To develop a total area of 2,020 hectares for reforestation, agro forestry, rattan plantation and stream bank stabilization using bamboo by the community people themselves within the five (5) barangays covered by the subproject; b. To provide employment and alternative livelihood opportunities for the subproject participants; and c. To strengthen the local communities to enable them to manage the watershed on a sustainable basis.

B) Modification

a. Modified purpose/objectives

a. To develop a total area of 2,520 hectares for reforestation, agro forestry, rattan plantation and stream bank stabilization using bamboo by the community people within the 11 barangays of the Subproject;

b. Reasons for the modification

The target area for CSD was originally pegged at 2,020 hectares. However, BAWARSA Inc. was able to establish /develop a total area of 2,164.09 hectares or an excess of 144.09 hectares. With this performance, an expansion area of 355.91 hectares was granted to the Association, which led to the inclusion of another six barangays with a total area of 2,520 hectares.

2. Subproject Scope and Dimension

A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope & Dimensions

a.1. Please check: There has been (revision ad/  or modification or  no revision and/or modification) of the Subproject scope and dimensions.

ITEM Original Scope and Revised/Modified Dimensions (At the time (Actual) of appraisal/Planned) 1.REFORESTATION/WATERSHED /CBFM

2

A. Survey, mapping and Planning 2,000 ha 2,000 ha 1 Year (August 28, 1995- (August 28, 1995- August 28, 1996) August 28, 1996)

B. Community Organizing 1 2,020 ha 2,020 ha 2 years (April 10, 1997- April (October20, 1999- 1999) November 2000) * IEC Activities * IEC Activities * Assistance to CSD * Assistance to CSD activities activities * Assistance on * Assistance on Networking and Linkage Networking and Linkage * Organizational * Organizational Development and Development and Capacity Building Capacity Building * Livelihood Project * Livelihood Project implementation implementation * Monitoring and * Monitoring and Evaluation Evaluation

C. CSD ( 3 years) 2,020 ha (1997-2000) 2,520 ha (1997-2003)

1. SOIL EROSION CONTROL

a. Trail and footpath  Graded Trail 52,504 meters 87,213.50 meters  Footpath 52,504 meters 87,213.50 meters  Model Farm 1 h a 2. VEGETATIVE MEASURES 2 . a. Agro forestry 550 ha 789.06 ha b. Tree Plantation d.1. Bamboo 53 ha 54.75 ha d.2. Rattan 717 ha 720.97 ha D.3. Plantation Sp. 700 ha 955.22 ha

3. Inventory of residual forest N/A N/A 4. Income Enhancement N/A N/A Subproject

3 5. Infrastructure (CSD)  Bunkhouse 2 units 4 units  Look-out Tower 4 units 5 units  Fire lines 700 ha 177,995 sq. m  Fire Breaks 700 ha 1,555.91 ha  Hedgerows 1,000.00 ha  Nursery Facilities 1 unit  Shed House 1 unit  Stock Room 1 unit  Water tank 1 unit

3. INFRASTRUCTURE COMPONENT  Farm-to-Market Road 6.76 km. Rehab.  Construction of Bridge 1 unit  Repair of Bridge 1 unit

C. MONITORING & EVALUATION

Year 1 (2000) Inspection Chart 2,020 ha (Physical Validation) Mapping (ICM) Feb.28, 2000- February 28, 2001

Year 2 Inspection Chart 2,520 ha *(Physical Validation Mapping (ICM) May 15, 2002- Component) November 2002 * Verification of Boundaries, monuments, and block corner posts * Seedling production inventory analysis * Survival Counting with 20% sampling intensity, including mapping of developed areas * Height and diameter measurement, assessment of overall health/appearance

4 * Inspection of Physical infrastructure

*(Institutional & Project 2,520 has Benefit Assessment December23, 2002- Component) June 2003 * Assessment on the overall development of the PO * Assessment on the capability of the PO to pursue sustainable resource management and sustain its livelihood initiatives * Identification of various issues/problems/const raints related to the development and strengthening of the PO and the relevant support systems * Identification of immediate benefits of the project and evidences that would indicate the intermediate and long- term socio-economic and environmental impacts. 2. SUSIMO Equipment provided to the 2 units GPS Office 3 2 units Forester Transit 3 units Bruton Compass 3 units Binoculars 3 units Abney hand level 1 unit Rain Gauge 3 units Radio Transceiver 1 unit Printer 1 unit Typewriter

5 Manual 1 unit GIS Maptitude 1 unit UPS 1 unit Computer 1 unit Generator 1 unit Polar Planimeter 2 units handheld Radio 1 unit Base Radio 2 units Steel Tape Nylon 1 unit Charger 1 unit Service Truck KIA

Equipment Locally Purchased Office Tables w/ chairs Drafting Table Camera Cannon Steel Cabinet Tape Recorder Medicine Cabinet Fire fighting Equipment Brush Cutter Gasullete Lamp Flashlight Calculator Triangular Scale T-Square Lettering Set Diameter Tape Steel Tape Steadler Pen Triangle

Researches Conducted NONE SUSIMO:

Trainings Conducted 4 1. Orientation Course for SUSIMO staff of Watershed Subproject Sites 2. Orientation Workshop on

6 the implementation of a Capital Build-up System for CBFMP 3. Watershed and Mangrove Orientation Course and other related guidelines on FSP 4. FSP- Orientation Course 5. On-The-Job Training on GIS/GPS Operation 6. FSP Phase out/Phase in Planning workshop Others: Infrastructure Facilities 1 unit Camera Turned-Over to DENR- 1 unit Air SUSIMO conditioner 1 unit Dining Table 3 units Office Tables 9 units Monobloc Chairs 1 unit Bamboo Bed 1 unit Bed Foam 1 unit Gas Range 1 unit Gasul Tank

Others 1 unit SUSIMO Office 1 Please refer to Table 1 for the details on trainings attended by the POs

2 Table 2 Details the subproject performance in terms of area planted

3 Table 3 shows the details of the equipment provided to the SUSIMO 4 Please refer to Table 4 for the trainings attended by the SUSIMO staff

B. Reasons for Revision/Modification of scope and Dimensions

7 b.1. Where there has been “revision/modification” of the Subproject scope and dimensions.

 Revision of the superior plan (e.g. sector development plan, etc.)  Revision of the supply-and-demand estimate  Large fluctuation in the Subproject cost  Substantial revision of design due to the unforeseeable physical condition at the time of the original design (e.g. poor soil condition, etc.)  Natural disaster/unseasonable weather  Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency  Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies, etc.)  Availability of funds (e.g. lack of funds, use of contingency, fluctuation of the exchange rate, etc.)  Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems  Procurement problems  Performance of contractor/supplier  Performance of consultant  Change in construction period  Others

B.2. Detailed statement of reasons (with background)

 Revision of the superior plan

Comprehensive Site Development:

The establishment and development of additional areas by the PO in excess of original target of 144.91 hectares triggered changes not only in the CSD scope but in almost all subcomponents as well. The excellent performance achieved without any additional budget in nursery and plantations establishment, was rewarded with the grant of additional expansion area of 355.91 hectares or a total revised target area of 2,520 hectares. However, during the final validation and survey of the established plantations, it was found out that the PO had even exceeded the revised target area with its accomplishment of 2,540 hectares or an excess of 20 hectares. Consequently, other targets of infrastructures like bunkhouses, look-out towers, graded trails and footpaths were increased for better monitoring and protection of plantation. Likewise, activities perceived necessary in the Subproject were also established such as fire lines and model farm for fire protection.

8 Community Organizing:

There were changes in the contractor for CO. The two-year CO contract was originally awarded to the Technological Advocates for Agro Forest Programs Association or TAFPA. However, it was cancelled/terminated due to non- compliance with the provisions of the contract. The CO contract was then rewarded to ZAMBAYUGMI for the continuation of the remaining activities left out by TAFPA. The remaining activities were completed in November 2000.

Infrastructure (added component of FSP):

When the NFDO together with the Technical Assistance team conducted an assessment of each subproject in 2000, they assessed that inclusion of the infrastructure support project especially livelihood development within Forestry Sector Project will provide great help to the PO. This finding led to the addition of the said component.

SUSIMO Creation

The Project Management Office initiated the Creation of SUSIMO to provide effective and efficient management of the Subproject on the field/ground level. The issuance of Department Administrative Order (DAO) No. 2000-65 entitled “ Guidelines Governing the Creation of Subproject Site Management Office and its Institutionalization in the Forestry Sector Project Implementation”, mandated the Regional and the Field Offices to install the SUSIMO for each subproject site and be manned by competent DENR permanent personnel. The SUSIMOs were provided with facilities and other equipment as well as capability building trainings for its staff for better subproject administration.

 Substantial revision of design due to the unpredictable physical condition at the time of the original design (e.g. poor soil condition, etc.)

Some of the identified and recommended species in the original plan were changed to species preferred by the members of the community themselves because of suitability of chosen species to the area and economic viability. Under the reforestation component, Eucalyptus Camaldulensis and Gmelina species were changed to Mahogany. For the Agro forestry Component, Mango and Jackfruit species were changed to Durian and lanzones.

C. Contribution of Subproject to Relevant (Sub) Sector(s)

c.1. (Sub) Sector (s) to which the Subproject belongs

9  Electric power and Gas  Telecommunication  Social services  (Multipurpose) Dams  Telecommunication  Water supply  Power Plants  Broadcasting  Sewerage  Transmission lines  Education  Distribution Systems  Irrigation and Flood control  Health  Gas  Irrigation  Tourism  Others  Flood control  Transportation  Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries  Roads  Agriculture and Forestry  Bridges  Fisheries  Railways  Airport  Mining and Manufacturing  Ports  Mining  Marine Transportation  Manufacturing  Others (Foot Bridge and employment)

c.2. Original (At the time of appraisal/Planned)

Item Description 1. Subproject Development Plan Through the Socio-Institutional and Bio-physical Components of the Subproject, local communities will become partners and active developers in the enhancement and protection of the watershed through various activities. Relatively, improvement in vegetative cover within the area will enhance the good quality and yield of water resources within and adjacent areas.

Involvement of the community in plantation establishment will provide them immediate employment thus eliminating destructive activities that contribute to the deforestation of the watershed area.

2. Livelihood Projects Implementation of viable livelihood projects will result to an increase in the household income of the community. A PO will be organized and capacitated to establish

10 linkages with other government and non-government organizations to enhance the livelihood projects as additional source of income while waiting for the harvest of forest and non-forest products.

3. Provision of Community Based Sense of ownership over the Forest management Agreement as a awarded CBFM area would Land Tenure Right over the area. encourage active participation of the community members in deterring illegal activities and cutting of tree species within the area. Moreover, there would be ripple effects as surrounding communities get inspired with the showcase and would want to embark on similar undertakings. It will create environmental awareness in adjacent communities.

4. Irrigation System Support Irrigation Systems, downstream key production areas, farm lands households, industrial and commercial establishments will be serviced by the watershed in terms of supplying their water requirements. This will create positive impact to the community, thus create awareness and prod communities to pursue the protection and continuous development of the watershed.

c.3. Present situation and outlook for the future

Item Description 1. The community and its Tenurial BAWARSA, Inc. was organized Instrument. primarily to manage and develop the Bayog Watershed Subproject. During its implementation, the members were taught proper management and sustainable development of the watershed with the help of DENR- SUSIMO and NGOs. They were

11 provided several trainings and workshops on technology aspects, financial management, livelihood establishment and effective organizational management. These skills are also meant to guide them in the proper management of their resources in the future as they were already awarded with CBFMA area giving them the right to manage and develop a total area of 3,326.53 hectares for 25 years and renewable for another 25 years.

2. Livelihood Projects implemented The PO established three livelihood by the Association of projects; Consumers Store, Rice BAWARSA5 Trading and Transportation Services with a total CFDF/CBU amounting to PHP 2,214,987.75. The PO is inspired to implement other viable livelihood projects in the future that will ensure high rate of employment generation within the community.

3. BAWARSA Women’s The women sector of the subproject Organization was organized last November, 2003 and registered with the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) on January 19, 2004 to implement other possible livelihood. The creation of Women’s Organization is envisioned to create more employment opportunities within the community and it is also envisioned to conduct community services like; non-formal education, information dissemination, facilitate trainings, among others.

4. Infrastructure The development of infrastructure projects (Farm to Market Road and Hanging Bridge) greatly improved the mobility and facilitated ease in transporting agricultural and livelihood products of the PO to the nearby market and municipalities.

12 5. Support of LGU The support and services rendered by the Provincial and Municipal LGU to the Subproject give an assurance that the project of the PO will be sustained in the future. Moreover, with the support, it is envisioned that maintenance of the farm-to-market will be sustained.

6. Project Development All activities set forth in the approved contract and WFP of the PO were completed and have exceeded the target especially in the reforestation component. With a high survival rate of the established plantation, it is expected that the water yield and quality will improve as a result of good vegetative cover; thus, further reducing the risk of flashfloods, soil sedimentation and soil erosion. It will also provide enough supply of water to support irrigation system for downstream communities. Currently, the Project supports a newly constructed irrigation dam of the National Irrigation Administration (NIA) for farmlands within the municipality of Bayog and its adjacent places.

The construction of CSD infrastructures more than the required target shows a strong commitment of the PO to make the project successful.

With the continuous maintenance and protection of their established tree/reforestation, agro-forestry, rattan and bamboo plantations, it is expected that high plantation yield and sustainability of the project will be attained in the future.

5 Please refer to Table 5 for the livelihood project being implemented by the POs

13 II. Subproject Implementation

1. Organizations for Implementing Subproject

Function in the Name of Organization Reasons for Subproject (1) Original (2) Changed Change Implementation 1.NGO for SMP Tungawan AgroForest Planters Association, Inc. (TAFPA)/Rep. Danilo Delos Santos

2.AO for CO Technological Zamboanga Terminated/ Advocates for (Bayog) Unified Cancelled Agro-forest Green Programs Movement, Association, Inc./Rep. Felipe Inc.(TAFPA)/Rep. Calipusan Danilo Delos Santos

3.Assisting Evangeline Vidal Contract expired/ Professional Eduardo none renewal (AP) Torralba

4.PO for CSD Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association, Inc.

5.NGO for M&E

(Physical& Summer Institutional Developer's Components) Association, Inc./Rep. Remus Bersamin

Year 2 (Physical Agro-Forestry Component) Technology

14 Services Association (AFTECH) (Rep.Antonio Lao)

(Institutional Greenshield Component) Association Inc. (Rep. Reynaldo F. San Antonio)

6. NGO for YSL Builder Inc. Infrastructure (Rep.Joseph Lim)

Please state: 1.1 Reasons for the change

A. For Community Organizing

Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject was organized by two (2) groups of community organizer. The first Community Organizing activities was awarded to Technological Advocates for Agro-forest Programs Association Inc. (TAFPA) represented by Mr. Danilo Delos Santos on April 10, 1997. The contract was terminated due to non-compliance with stipulated provisions and abandonment of his obligation as a contractor. The remaining CO activities were then awarded to a qualified bidder based on the criteria set for CO contract, the Zamboanga (Bayog) Unified Green Movement Inc. (ZAMBAYUGMI) represented by Mr. Felipe Calipusan on September 30, 1999. All activities set forth in the approved WFP of the second AO contractor were undertaken and accomplished.

B. For Assisting Professional

Two Assisting Professionals (AP) were initially hired by the PO to assist the SUSIMO in ensuring effective and efficient implementation of the Subproject components. However, the expired contract service of the first AP, Evangeline Vidal was not renewed due to attitude problem which resulted to unsatisfactory performance as complained by the PO and SUSIMO. Mr. Eduardo Torralba was immediately hired by DENR thru OIDCI whose expertise is on livelihood development. This time, the second AP successfully assisted the PO in the implementation of the identified livelihood projects.

1.2 Problems arising, counter measures adopted and results Problems arising during the subproject implementation:

15 A. For Community Organizing

(1) The Assisting Organizing (AO) TAFPA failed to comply with the provisions stipulated in their contract.

The DENR-Central Office terminated the contract of the AO (TAFPA) and re-awarded another contract to the qualified AO based on the criteria set forth in DENR MC 97-03 for the continuation of the remaining CO activities. As a result, the POs’ knowledge and skills in project management has improved.

(2) The AO failed to establish linkages with other agencies or organizations in providing technical and additional financial assistance particularly for the livelihood project to sustain the Association while waiting for the harvestable products in the Subproject area.

SUSIMO and PO coordinated with the LGU and other government agencies particularly with the Department of Agriculture (DA) to provide assistance to the PO’s livelihood projects. As a result, the PO was given a warehouse building, which is used as PO office, incinerator, and Solar Drier worth Php 2.2 million by Governor Aurora Cerilles (Province of Zamboanga del Sur).

(3) PO’s Lack of understanding regarding their responsibilities and objectives during the early stage of project implementation.

The DENR, from top management down to field level facilitated and assisted the PO in reviewing and reiterating the functions and responsibilities of the PO BOT’s, Officers and member. As a result, functions and responsibilities of the PO were clearly understood.

B. For Assisting Professional

The AP assigned in the area was not well versed on the objectives and concept of the FSP Subproject, particularly the CBFMP.

The AP was invited and requested to attend every IEC activity conducted in the Subproject. Likewise, leveling off meeting with the concerned AP was facilitated by the SUSIMO. As a result, FSP and CBFMP concept were fully understood by the assigned AP.

C. For Comprehensive Site Development (CSD)

Occurrence of El Niño phenomenon between 1997 and 1998 resulted to the poor plantation survival rate. The PO in coordination with the DENR

16 formulated strategies and counter measures to address the said problems, such as follows:

 Organized an internal quality inspection committee composed of Board of Trustees and PO Technical Staff to conduct the quarterly inspection, monitoring and supervision of the plantation.  Conducted training on proper ways of handling/transporting seedlings, site preparation and planting particularly hole digging with a minimum diameter equal to thrice the diameter of plastic bag and depth.  Due to far distance and terrain of sites, backyard nurseries were allowed aside from the main and sub nurseries with close monitoring and supervision of the technical staff of the association.  Intensive IEC activities were conducted per barangay.  The PO requested the DENR for change of suitable species preferred by the community.

With the above strategies, the survival rate went up and the quality of the plantations improved. The PO even exceeded the required target by 144.09 hectares, thus, resulted to the approval of the additional expansion area of 355.91 hectares or a total revised target of 2,520 hectares from the original target of 2,020 hectares. However, during the final survey of total plantation area, it was found out that the PO has again exceeded the revised target by 20 hectares. Said excess plantations were no longer paid by the DENR. The Association now garnered a weighted average survival rate of 90.39%.

1.3 The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for the implementation of the Subproject is ( attached or  not available).

Organizational charts are attached as Annex 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 1g, 1h and 1i for Tungawan Agro-Forest Planner Association, Inc. (SMP contractor), Technological Advocates for Agro-Forest Programs Association, Inc. (CO Contractor), Zamboanga-Bayog Unified Green Movement, Inc. (CO Contractor), Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association, Inc. (CSD Contractor), Summer Developers Association, Inc. (M&E Contractor), Agro-Forestry Technology Services Association (M&E Contractor), Greenshield Association, Inc. (M&E Contractor), SUSIMO- Bayog, and YSL Builders (Infrastructure Contractor), respectively.

2. Implementation Period

A. Comparison of Original Schedule and Actual Period

17 ITEM ORIGINAL SCHEDULE ACTUAL PERIOD

1.Survey, Mapping and August 28, 1995-August August 28, 1995- Planning 28, 1996 August 28, 1996

2.Contract of AO for CO April 10, 1997 – April 10, October 20, 1999 to 1999 November 2000

3.Contract of PO for September 22, 1997 to September 22, 1997 to CSD December 30, 2000 June 30, 2003

4.Contract of NGO for February 2000-May 2003 February 2000- June, M&E 2003

5.Contract of February 11, 2002- May February 11, 20002 – Infrastructure 16, 2003 October 15, 2003 Component

 Completion December 2000 October 15, 2003 (Completion of Subproject)

Please refer to Table 6 for the subproject status report

Notes: Completion of the Subproject was defined as ( completion ceremony or  final disbursement or  other than the above.

The completion date was scheduled for December 30, 2000 (at the time of appraisal) and is indicated (thus ) in the above Table.

B. Reasons for Delay or Early Completion

b.1. In case of delay or early completion, please choose the reason(s) from the following list and check.

 Change in scope/dimensions  Natural disaster/Unseasonable weather (e.g. Earthquake, typhoon, etc.)  Shortage of funds/Fluctuation of the exchange rate  Problems in procurement  Inflation  Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency  Structural and organizational problems of the

18 Agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate Coordination with other agencies, etc.)  Legislative matters  Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems  Performance of contractor/supplier  Performance of consultant  Others (M&E report improvement) b.2. Reasons and background for delay or early completion

 Performance of contractor/supplier

On Community Organizing

The original contract for CO was only for two years covering the period from April 1997 to April 1999.The completion of Community Organizing activities as planned was delayed due to non-compliance of the former CO contractor (TAFPA) to the provisions stipulated in their contract and abandonment of his obligation as a CO contractor that resulted to termination of contract.

 Change in scope/dimension

Comprehensive Site development Contract (CSD)

During the early implementation of the Project, the established plantation suffered from high rate of mortality due to the EL Niño phenomenon that occurred between 1997 and 1998. This has led to the extension of the contract duration as approved by the JBIC for the FSP to improve the quality of plantations and to attain a greater survival rate. The PO intensified the maintenance activities such as: ring weeding, cultivation, establishment of firebreaks and fire lines, application of fertilizer and patrol work.

 Structural and organizational problems of the Agencies concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate Coordination with other agencies, etc.)

During the early stage of implementation, one site coordinator was assigned in the Subproject area to assist, facilitate, monitor and evaluate the performance of the AO, PO, and M&E contractor. Assistance to the AO and the PO’s performances were ineffective, resulting to backlogs and low survival rate of the established plantation. In the same manner, the created Composite Inspection Committee (CIC) was loaded with multiple

19 functions in their respective offices resulting to delays in the conduct of monitoring and evaluation on the accomplishments of contractors.

 Change in scope/dimensions

Infrastructure Component

The completion of the infrastructure project was extended due to the inclusion of an additional 1.3 kilometers as requested by the LGU. And also because of the financial management problem of the contractor who had no sufficient resources to pay its workers. These two situations caused delay in the completion of the infrastructure project.

 Others (M&E report improvement)

After the completion of M&E activities on May 2003, the concerned M&E contractors facilitated the submission of respective reports to the Regional Office and NFDO. However, evaluation showed that there were some vital information not reflected in the final report and rectification based on the recommendation made by the Regional Office and NFDO was suggested. This led to the one-month extension for the rectification/improvement of M&E report.

C. Remedial Action Taken in Each Case of Delay

Community Organizing

TAFPA’s incompetence led to the immediate termination of its contract. The remaining activities were awarded to a qualified contractor and the DENR adhered strictly with the existing guidelines for Community Organizing contract. Likewise, close monitoring and supervision of the DENR personnel helped in the accomplishment of the remaining activities and expected outputs.

Comprehensive Site Development

Pursuant to MC 2000-19 related revision of the WFPs and amendment of the CSD contracts to update the cost was undertaken.

Infrastructure Component

In the case of Infrastructure, the site engineer together with ISTaF closely monitored and supervised the activities implemented by the contractor based on the approved work plan. Corrections on the contractor’s activities were noted and listed under the watch or punch list

20 to which the contractor agreed to rectify. Likewise, monthly kick-off meetings were undertaken to immediately address the problems and issues encountered. Further, remedies and strategies were done in order to accomplish all activities as set within the given period. One strategy was the financial assistance extended by PO-BAWARSA to concerned contractor by lending some amount and guarantees to the suppliers of materials for the contractor to accomplish all activities as scheduled.

Monitoring and Evaluation

A one-month extension was given to respective M&E contractors for the rectification of their final reports based on the existing guidelines of M&E.

3. Subproject Cost

A. Comparison of Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure (by Component)

Original Cost Actual Expenditures Item (Based on appraisal) (In M pesos) (In M pesos)

Survey, Mapping 1.350000 1.350000 and Planning

Community 5.559378 2.908091 Organizing

Comprehensive 25.549460 58.495256 Site Development

Monitoring and Evaluation 3.471560 3.463480

Infrastructure 19.013561 19.013561 Dev’t

Subproject 2.283240 2.283240 Coordinating Office TOTAL 57.227199 87.513629 Please refer to Tables 7,8,9, 10 for the details on cost of SMP, CO, CSD, and M&E. List of Infra project/s with its corresponding cost is also attached as Table 11

21 B. Reasons for Difference between Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure

 Increase in reconstruction cost arising from natural disaster/unreasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.)  Increase or decrease arising from a change in construction Period  Increase or decrease arising from inflation  Increase or decrease arising from fluctuation in the exchange rate  Increase or decrease arising from a change in the scope/work volume of the Subproject  Decrease arising from keen competition in tender  Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency  Unrealistic cost estimates/Technical problems  Others

b.1. Description of the detailed reason(s) and background  Increase or decrease arising from a change in the Scope/work volume of the Subproject

 For Comprehensive Site Development

There was an increase in the estimated cost and actual expenditure of the CSD component due to the expansion area given to the PO for attaining a remarkable performance and exceeding the original target. Likewise, the cost increased due to current change in the economic situation of the country whereby there was an urgent need to adjust the cost of establishing, maintaining and protecting the established plantations in the subproject. Thus, MC 2000-19 “Guidelines Governing the Updating of Cost Estimates and Intensification of Plantation Maintenance and Protection Activities for DENR” for FSP Watershed Subprojects under JBIC funding was adopted. This resulted to increase in unit cost of various activities of different components as well as increase in frequency of ringweeding, cultivation, application’s of fertilizer, patrolling and establishment of additional targets for infrastructures; such as footpaths, graded trails, bunkhouses, look out towers and fire lines.

 Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing Agency (Performance of the Contractor)

22  For Community Organizing

Due to termination of the TAFPA contract, the contractor filed a case in the court against the DENR. The amount intended for the activities under the contract of TAFPA was excluded in the total contract cost of the new AO, tapped by the DENR to continue the CO activities of the subproject. The intended amount was retained at the Regional Office.

 Action taken in Case of Cost Overrun and Results

A revision of the WFP for the CSD components was carried out and approved due to the additional plantation target and volume of work for the infrastructure. A supplemental contract was made and approved to support the changes/revisions made. The additional amount was allotted and obligated to effect the payment for the accomplishments.

C. Comparison of Original Estimated Expenditure and Actual Expenditure (by Year)

Original Cost Actual Expenditures Calendar (based on appraisal) (in M pesos) Year (in M pesos)

1995 1.350000 1.350000 1996 - - 1997 18.296078 0.523343 1998 7.229630 2.772433 1999 3.659751 8.159079 2000 3.915578 14.379005 2001 0.470000 17.108166 2002 2.197360 24.992024 2003 1.095240 18.229578

Total 57.227199 87.513629 Please refer to Table 12 for the details of Annual Work and Financial Plan.

4. Comments on Performance of Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP), Assisting Organizations (AOs), Assisting Professionals (APs), Peoples Organizations (POs), M&E and Infrastructure contractors.

Please describe the performance of each organization after checking the item(s) in the relevant lists on which you have any comment.

23 A. Performance of Assisting Organizations & Assisting Professionals (If any) Peoples Organizations, M&E and Infrastructure contractors a.1.  Overall performance  Design  Contract administration  Construction supervision  Expertise  Staff qualifications  Coordinating ability  Compliance with Contracts  Performance related to any other than the Subproject scope, if any.  Others a.2 Description (in detail) Overall Performance

 Survey, Mapping and Planning

Tungawan Agro-Forest Planner Association Inc. (TAFPA), represented by Mr. Danilo Delos Santos, conducted the Survey, Mapping and Planning Component of the project. It was contracted on August 28, 1995 with a total contract cost of P1, 350,000.00 covering an area of 2000 hectares. All activities stipulated in the approved contract and WFP were completed and accepted by the DENR, Regional Office on May 06, 1996. Performance of the contractor was satisfactory for accomplishing all the activities based on the approved contract.

 Assisting Organizations

The first AO contractor TAPFA was rated unsatisfactory for not complying with the conditions stipulated in his contract and CO guidelines contained in DAO 97-03, resulting in the termination of its contract. The performance of the assisting organization ZAMBAYUGMI was rated satisfactory since all activities stipulated in the approved WFP were undertaken. AO staff deployed in the Subproject were foresters and experienced in community organizing and other related activities. Although some activities like networking and linkages, assistance in the implementation of identified livelihood were not fully imparted to POs, the AO exerted efforts in working closely with all the key actors in order to convey the real objectives of their activity in relation to Subproject implementation.

 Assisting Professionals

There were two Assisting Professionals deployed to assist the Subproject implementation. Both had the capability to facilitate technical assistance to PO. The former had expertise in organizational

24 management while the latter’s expertise was on livelihood development and implementation. The latter AP had assisted and facilitated the implementation of the identified livelihood of PO and now operating successfully.

 Peoples Organization

The accomplishment of BAWARSA on CSD activities showed a remarkable performance in attaining the target based on the approved contract and WFP. The overall performance of the Association was rated very satisfactory for completing and exceeding its target. Technically, the PO now possessed all the necessary skills, knowledge gained from training/seminars conducted. They are now qualified as forestry skilled leaders and stakeholders in terms of expertise in implementing CSD activities.

 Monitoring and Evaluation

The performance of the contractors for M & E, both Physical and Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment was satisfactory. Target activities were accomplished. As to the capability of contractors, most of the staff/members are technically-equipped and knowledgeable in the contracted activities.

 Infrastructure Contractor

The performance of the contractor was not satisfactory, in the sense that the scheduled programs of work were not attained as expected based on the approved contract.

5. Other matters relating to Subproject Implementation

Please choose the item(s) from the following list on which you have any comment, check it (them), and describe it (them) with measure and results in (B) below.

A. Technical  Financial  Institutional  Economic  Social/Distributional  Others B. Description (in detail) Technical

Selection of Personnel to man the project implementation

Monitoring and evaluation of the SUSIMO staff over project implementation was previously insufficient because some of the staff

25 assigned in the SUSIMO lacked dedication in their work although they possessed technical knowledge and skills. On this, a special order was issued by the Secretary to replace the concerned SUSIMO staff. As a result, the new SUSIMO team worked effectively and efficiently.

III. Action Taken by the AOs, APs and POs relating to Recommendation(s)

1. Recommendation(s) made by SUSIMO

SUSIMO check: This article is ( applicable. The recommendations are given in Annex – I herewith or  not applicable. There has been no recommendation with regard to the Subproject).

2. Action Taken and Results

Recommendations Action Taken Action Taken Results by AO’s by PO’s Development of SUSIMO and PO members Improvement of skills and APs conducted and officers PO’s knowledge and knowledge of the different participated skills as regards PO officers and trainings and actively in all financial and members through workshops like trainings and project trainings on financial system workshops management were technical, and that were observed. financial and management conducted to management seminar, improve their aspect. project management management, skills over the re-orientation Subproject. on CBFMP, Fire brigade training, among others.

IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities

1. Present Condition of Facilities

A. Please check: This article is ( applicable due to problem(s) or  not applicable. No particular problem has occurred since the initial operation started). If there have been any problems, please check the relevant space in the Table

26 For the SUSIMO

Item Status Initial Maintenance Management Others Operation

1. ) GPS Serviceable 2. ) Compass Serviceable 3. ) Binocular Stolen 4. ) Topographic Serviceable OSk 5. ) Rain Gauge Serviceable Digital Rain Wise 6.) Radio Serviceable Transceiver 7.) Printer Stolen / 8.) Typewriter Serviceable / 9.) GIS Stolen 10.) UPS Gamatronic Unserviceable Compact 11.) Personal Computer Stolen 12.) Generator / 13.) Polar Serviceable Planimeter Serviceable 14.) Hand held 15.) Steel Tape Serviceable 16.) Charger Serviceable 17.) KIA Ceres Serviceable 18.) Working Unserviceable Animals Unserviceable 19.) Truck (KIA -2700) Serviceable / 20.) Motorcycle / Serviceable

For the PO

Item Status Initial Maintenance Managemen Others Operation t

1.) Bunkhouse Serviceable / 2.) Look-out Serviceable /

27 Tower 3.) Incinerator Serviceable 4.) Solar Tunnel Serviceable Drier

5.) PO Building Serviceable 6.) Communication Serviceable Equipments 7.) Motorcycle Serviceable 8.) Truck Serviceable 9.) Computer Serviceable 10.) Printer Serviceable / 11.) Air Serviceable / conditioner 12.) Filing/Steel Serviceable Cabinet 13.) Minolta-EP Serviceable / 1054 Copier 14.) Video Serviceable Camera 15.) Nursery Serviceable Facilities 16.) Electric Fan Serviceable / 17.) Type Writer Serviceable / 18.) Water pump Serviceable 19.) Television Serviceable

B. Please check: The Problem(s) has arisen owing to the following reason(s).

 Technical  Financial  Institutional  Economic  Social/Distributional  Others

C. Description (in detail)

For the SUSIMO ITEM ORIGINAL PLAN ACTUAL OPERATION 1 Global Positioning For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO System (GPS) from NFDO) 2 Compass (Forester For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO Transit) from NFDO)

28 3 Compass (Brunton For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO Compass) from NFDO) 4 Binoculars (7x50) For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO from NFDO) 5 Abney Hand Level For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO from NFDO) 6 Rain Gauge For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO from NFDO)

7 Radio Transceivers For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO from NFDO) 8 Steel Tape For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO from NFDO) 9 Handheld Radio Battery For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO Charger 10 Printer For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO from NFDO)

11 Type writer For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO from NFDO) 12 GIS Maptitude For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO from NFDO) 13 UPS For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO from NFDO) 14 Personal Computer For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO from NFDO) 15 Generator For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO from NFDO) 16 Two Tunner Truck For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO from NFDO) 17 Motorcycles For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO from NFDO) 18 Polar Planimeter For the SUSIMO (Downloaded For the SUSIMO from NFDO) 19 VHS Player Player For the AO (Assisting Turned-over to DENR- Organization) SUSIMO-Bayog 20 Television For the AO (Assisting Turned-over to DENR- Organization) SUSIMO-Bayog 21 Tables For the AO (Assisting Turned-over to DENR- Organization) SUSIMO-Bayog 22 Petronas Gasul (gas For the Infra Contractor (YSL Turned-over to DENR- stove) Builders) SUSIMO-Bayog

29 23 Air Conditioner For the Infra Contractor (YSL Turned-over to DENR- Builders) SUSIMO-Bayog 24 Beddings For the Infra Contractor (YSL Turned-over to DENR- Builders) SUSIMO-Bayog 25 Trash Can For the Infra Contractor (YSL Turned-over to DENR- Builders) SUSIMO-Bayog 26 Office Building For the Infra Contractor (YSL Turned-over to DENR- Builders) SUSIMO-Bayog 27 Camera For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO 28 Tape Recorder For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

29 Steel Cabinet For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO 30 Office Tables For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

31 Fire Fighting Equipment For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO 32 Chairs (9 pcs. Office For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO chairs and 10 pcs. Monobloc Chairs) 33 Brush Cutters For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

34 Gasulette Lamp For the SUSIMO For the SUSIMO

For the PO Item Original Plan Actual Operation

1.) Bunkhouse For the PO For The PO 2.) Look-out Tower For the PO For The PO 3.) Incinerator For the PO For the PO 4.) Solar Tunnel Drier For the PO For the PO 5.) PO Building For the PO For the PO 6.) Communication For the PO For the PO Equipments For the PO For the PO 7.) Motorcycle For the PO For the PO 8.) Truck For the PO For the PO 9.) Computer For the PO For the PO 10.) Printer For the PO For the PO 11.) Air conditioner For the PO For the PO 12.) Filing/Steel Cabinet For the PO For the PO 13.) Minolta-EP 1054 For the PO For the PO Copier For the PO For the PO 14.) Video Camera For the PO For the PO 15.) Nursery Facilities For the PO For the PO 16.) Electric Fan For the PO For the PO 17.) Type Writer For the PO For the PO

30 18.) Water pump 19.) Television

2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance

A. Name of PO

a.1. Please give the name of PO and/or Body in charge of O/M.

PO: Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association, Inc. (BAWARSA, Inc)

SUSIMO: SUSIMO Bayog- Administrative Support Unit (ASU)

a.2. Please check:

The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for O/M of the Subproject facilities is (attached or  not available).

The operation and maintenance of Subproject facilities and equipment of the PO were done by the organization itself. In case of malfunctions and loss, it is the organization that will be in charge for the repair and procurement of such equipment. For the SUSIMO, it is the Administrative and Support Unit (ASU) that is in charge of the maintenance of SUSIMO equipment and facilities.

a.3. If the organization chart (or equivalent) is not available, please state the reason.

B. Number of staff/workers of the PO or Body for Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities.

PO (BAWARSA): 18 SUSIMO (Bayog): 2

C. Please check and explain the following.

c.1. The number of staff is currently ( sufficient or  insufficient). If “Insufficient”, please describe your estimate of the optimum number of staff and your plan for providing them.

c.2. Average employment period of the present staff: PO (BAWARSA): 2 to 3 years SUSIMO (Bayog): 4 years

31 c.3. Availability of training program to promote the vocational ability of the staff, its contents and expected effects.

 None

3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure for Operation and Maintenance (by Year)

A. Original Expected Expenditure

For the SUSIMO (Unit: Mil Pesos) Item Maintenance Operation Total Calendar year 2001 0.144628 0.433884 0.578511 2002 0.195973 0.587919 0.783892 2003 0.240050 0.480101 0.720151 Total 0.580651 1.501904 2.082554

For the PO Item Maintenance Operation Total Calendar year 1997 0.114248 0.342744 0.456990 1998 0.003770 - 0.003770 1999 - 0.028550 0.028550 2000 0.030460 0.060920 0.091379 2001 0.037884 0.113649 0.151531 2002 0.081390 0.244168 0.325558 2003 0.124217 0.372651 0.496866 2004 - 0.001270 0.001270

TOTAL 0.391969 1.163952 1.555921

B. Actual and Currently Expected Expenditure

For the SUSIMO (Unit: Mil Pesos) Item Maintenan Operation Maintenance & Total Calendar year ce (For Operation expanded portion) 2001 1. Office 0.113067 0.113067 2. Motorcycle 0.030826 0.030826 3. KIA-Ceres

32 2002 1. Office 0.227080 0.227080 2. Motorcycle 3. KIA-Ceres 0.035962 0.035962

2003

1. Office 0.282796 0.282796 2. Motorcycle 0.011400 0.011400 3. KIA-Ceres 4. KIA-4x4 0.018718 0.018718

2004 0.148750 0.026250 0.180000

TOTAL 0.720000 0.148750 0.026250 0.900000

For the PO Item Maintenance Operation Maintenance & Total Calendar year (For Operation expanded portion) 1997 Office 0.028099 0.028099 1998 Office 0.001370 0.028550 0.029920 1999 Office 0.246510 0.034350 0.280860 2000 Office Computer 0.087771 0.151532 0.239303 Typewriter 2001 Office 0.029845 0.029845 2002 Office Computer Typewriter 0.103165 0.023251 0.126416 Communication Equipments

2003 Truck Motorcycle 0.090627 0.136080 0.226707 Water pump

33 Office 2004 Cell phones Video Camera 0.027807 0.027807

TOTAL 0.529443 0.495514 1.024957

Note: Actual and currently expected expenditure for expansion, replacement or any other improvement purposes

Please describe the basis for the above estimate and your financing plan for the same.

No amount was given for the expanded portion of maintenance and operation of facilities for the PO. Cost provided was based on actual disbursement. In the case of SUSIMO, facilities were maintained depending on the fund allocation downloaded by the NFDO. However, it will be the responsibility of the concerned CENRO to oversee and maintain these facilities when it will be turned over to their custody. Maintenance cost could be sourced out from the DENR regular funds.

4. Maintenance Method

A. Content of Method B. Frequency

For the SUSIMO Kind of Facility Maintenance Method Frequency 1. 2-ton truck Repair/replacement of defective As the need arises parts, Change oil, Every 2 months Wheels rotation As the need arises 2. Motorcycle Repair/replacement of defective As the need arises parts, Change oil Every moth

For the PO Kind of Facility Maintenance Method Frequency Computer * Change of defective lightning As the need arises Copier * Procurement of office supplies Every Month Typewriter (Bond papers, ink for typewriter & Printer Computer, folders, etc.) Lightings * Payment of Electric and Water Every Month Bills

34 Shovel, Bolo, * Procurement in case of loss or As the need arises Water pump, among Wreckage Others * Repairs of defective equipment As the need arises PO Building/Office * Improvements As the need arises * Repair of defective parts Communication * Repair in case of wreck Equipments As the need arises * Load for Cell phone Every 1 or 2 Months Truck * Change oil Every 3 months * Change of tires As the need arises * Repair and Improvements As the need arises * Tune up Every 3 months Motorcycle * Change oil Every month * Tune up Every Month

C. Others, if any.

V. Benefits derived from Subproject

1. Indirect Effects

A. Please choose and check the item(s), which are dealt with this Article by you.

 Technological transfer (e.g. application of technology used in the Subproject to other similar projects and subprojects)  Employment creating (e.g. during construction, contribution to the sector(s) after completion)  Income-raising (e.g. income of the residents in the region) Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s) and/or the region concerned

B. Please give details for each of the item(s) you checked.

Employment Generation

During the implementation of the CSD, participating communities availed of job opportunities especially plantation establishment, seedlings production and maintenance activities of the watershed subproject. In the implementation of the subproject, it generated employment opportunities to project participants registering 404,601 man-days. As of now, employment generation programs of the PO are still on-going thru their established livelihood projects. Livelihood training opportunities are still being participated in by the communities.

35 Income Raising

Increase in income of the project beneficiaries is the outcome of employment opportunities generated by implementation of the project as well as the livelihood projects. At the time of appraisal, the annual average household income of the community was PHP 42,000.00. After the project implementation, the annual average household income increased to PHP 68,400.00 or 63% increased based on the final validation for Institutional Project Benefit Assessment (IPBA) conducted by Green shield Association. Indicators of socio-economic improvement can be observed in the community such as improvement of individual houses, availing of education opportunities for their children even up to college level, procurement of household facilities/equipment and implementation of backyard livelihood income generating projects such as African “hito” catfish and shrimp culture.

36 VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 The Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject’s overall implementation is very satisfactory. News about its positive socio- economic and environmental impacts has created awareness not only in the province of Zamboanga del Sur but has spread in the entire region.

 The dedication and commitment of the SUSIMO personnel, LGUs and most especially BAWARSA, Inc. played a great role in the Subproject’s success.

 It is recommended that policy changes regarding the project must be consulted with the field personnel down to the PO inasmuch as they are the primary beneficiaries of any changes.

 SUSIMO personnel and Community Organizing contractors should be deployed in assigned areas at the initial and final phase of the project to ensure clear interpretation of instructions to be carried out.

 The DENR should be strict with the NGO for community organizing on the matter of staff deployment to ensure that only those with the necessary knowledge and skills are fielded to satisfactorily develop and enhance the technical and social capabilities of the POs.

 Causes of delay in the implementation of the project should be immediately addressed and people who are responsible for such should be meted immediate sanctions and /or be reprimanded.

37 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 1. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY THE PEOPLES ORGANIZATION

# OF TRAINING TRAINORS INCLUSIVE DATES PARTICIPANTS 1 Pre-Membership Seminar AO 42 Nov. 26-28, 1999 2 Seminar on Community AO 85 Jan. 7, 2000 Based Forest Management and Comprehensive Site Development on Protection and Maintenance 3 Sloping Agricultural Land AO 51 May 1-2, 2000 Technology (SALT) 4 Value Formation AO PO June 21-22, 2000 Officers/members

5 Forest Fire Protection, AO PO Oct. 17, 2000 Central Management Officers/members Seminar 6 Computer Operation and AO 15 N/A Preventive Maintenance 7 Seminar/Lecture on AO 44 16-May-97 Community Based Forest Management Program (CBFMP) 8 A Training on Initial AO 46 5-Apr-97 Comprehensive Site Development (CSD) 9 Workshop on TNA and AO 33 Jun 3-11, 1997 Livelihood Opportunities 10 Re-echo Orientation on the SUSIMO 49 Jan. 23-24, 2001 Creation of SUSIMO 11 Financial System and SUSIMO 35 March 22-24, 2001 Management Seminar 12 Project Management SUSIMO 49 26-Mar-01 13 Fire Bridgade Training SUSIMO 45 June 26-28, 2001 14 Workshop on Livelihood SUSIMO 115 May14-15, 2003 Project Monitoring and Evaluation 15 Seminar on Forest Fire SUSIMO PO Sept. 10, 2002 Control and Management Officers/members 16 Seminar/Workshop on Value SUSIMO PO Nov. 24-28,2003 Formation and Team Officers/members Building of SUSIMO staff and PO Officers and Stakeholders of BAWARSA, Inc. 17 Re-echo orientation Course on SUSIMO 15 19-Jun-03 the concept of CBFMA, livestock production & DAO 2000-65 FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 Table 2. SUBPROJECT PERFORMANCE

Year Planted Component Species Planted Area Planted Survival (Has) (%) 1998 Reforestation Gmelina 7.19 91.67 Mahogany 40.11 91.55 Narra 3 91.29

Agroforestry Mango 2.54 89.85 Lanzones 63 90.47 Jackfruit 2.69 84.92 Coffee 32.03 89.27

Rattan Palasan 70.8 91.19 Sub-Total 221.36 90.02

1999 Reforestation Gmelina 19.05 91.69 Mahogany 697.88 90.55 Narra 87.99 91.29

197.46 Agroforestry Mango 89.85 Lanzones 88. 69 90.47 Jackfruit 97.31 84.92 Coffee 69.43 89.27

Rattan Palasan 650.17 91.19

Bamboo Bamboo 54.75 91.11 Sub-Total 1,962.73 90.04

2001 Reforestation Narra 40 91.29 Mahogany 80 90.55

Agroforestry Durian 215.91 91.42 Rambutan 20.00 91.22

Sub-Total 355.91 91.12 Grand Total 2,540.00 90.39 Note: During the final validation and survey of the established plantations, the PO has established a total developed area of 2,540 ha with 20 ha excess as compared to the total revised target of 2, 520 ha FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 Table 3. SUBPROJECT SITE MANAGEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENTS

Procured ITEM Specifications Qty Cost (PhP) Date/year procured 1 Global Positioning System (GPS) 2 units (SN- Global Positioning System (GPS) 2 units 2 3/28/2001 210,000.00 3F302477, SN-3E302237 (SN-3F302477, SN-3E302238 2 Compass (Forester Transit) Ushikata Model Ushikata Model S2-75 (made in Japan) 2 21-May-01 65,680.00 S2-75 (made in Japan) 2 units 2 units 3 Compass (Brunton Compass) Kataoka Brand, Kataoka Brand, Model BCD-90, 4 units 4 3/28/2001 19,552.00 Model BCD-90, 4 units 4 Binoculars (7x50) 3 units (7x50) 3 3/28/2001 12,168.00 5 Abney Hand Level (Model OSK 17251) 4 (Model OSK 17251) 4 units 4 5/21/2001 9,568.00 units 6 Rain Gauge (Digital Rainwise made in USA) 1 (Digital Rainwise made in USA) 1 5/28/2001 6,300.00 set 7 Lettering Set Leroy Set 1 5/28/2001 4,992.00 8 Radio Trancievers (Handheld SN-018-73, (Handheld SN-018-73, Handheld 2 1/12/2001 29,933.28 Handheld VHF/FM ICOM model 07822) 2 VHF/FM ICOM model 07822) units 9 Steel Tape (Nylon Tape/50 meters long) 2 (Nylon Tape/50 meters long) 2 4/23/2001 2,700.00 units 10 Handheld Radio Battery Charger (ICOM (ICOM Brand) 2 _ _ Brand) 2 units 11 Printer (Inkjet Hawlette Pachard: SN-MX (Inkjet Hawlette Pachard: SN-MX 2 4/27/2001 5,811.52 087IBIF2, LX-300) 2 units 087IBIF2, LX-300) 12 Type writer (Manual, 18 carriage Olivetti (Manual, 18 carriage Olivetti Brand) 1 28-Mar-01 8,309.60 Brand) 1 unit 13 GIS Maptitude (Combination of Software (Combination of Software and 1 3/28/2001 44,460.00 and Geographic date: SN-04-202616) 1 unit Geographic date: SN-04-202616) 14 UPS (Gamatronic Compact: SN-221372) 1 (Gamatronic Compact: SN-221372) 1 4/15/2001 5,720.00 unit 15 Personal Computer (HP Brio PC: SN (HP Brio PC: SN 10771780) 1 2/20/2001 70,850.00 10771780) 1 set 16 Generator (Gasoline engine: SN 74326) 1 (Gasoline engine: SN 74326) 1 4/23/2001 44,096.00 unit 17 Two Tunner Truck (KIA Crosstruck 4x4 (KIA Crosstruck 4x4 engine: No. J2- 1 9/30/2002 680,000.00 engine: No. J2-3027839) 1 unit 3027839) 18 Motorcycles (TS SUSUKI) 3 units (TS SUSUKI) 3 n/a n/a 19 Polar Planimeter (with optical tracer-OSKK, (with optical tracer-OSKK, Koizumi 1 10/26/2001 7,800.00 Koizumi brand) 1 unit brand) Icom Base Radio Model 01822 Icom 1 _ 64,789.92 20 VHS Player Player (Sony Brand) 1 unit (Sony Brand) 1 n/a n/a 21 Television (Sony Colored TV 21") 1 unit (Sony Colored TV 21") 1 n/a n/a 22 Tables (Office Tables) 2 units n/a 2 n/a n/a 23 Petronas Gasul with Gas Tank 1 set n/a 1 n/a n/a 24 Air Conditioner (National Brand) 1 unit (National Brand) 1 n/a n/a 25 Beddings (Dio Foam Brand) 1 set (Dio Foam Brand) 1 n/a n/a 26 Trash Can (Plastic) 1 unit n/a 1 n/a n/a 27 Office Building (Contractor Office) 1 unit (Contractor Office) 1 n/a n/a (Cannon Prima Jr. and Cannon with zoom 28 Camera (Cannon Prima Jr. and Cannon with 2 n/a n/a lens) zoom lens) 2 units 29 Tape Recorder 3 units n/a 3 30 Steel Cabinet 4 units n/a 4 n/a n/a 31 Office Tables 15 pcs. n/a 15 n/a n/a 32 Fire Fighting Equipment 1 set n/a 1 n/a n/a 33 Chairs (9 pcs. Office chairs and 10 pcs. 19 n/a n/a n/a Monobloc Chairs) 34 Brush Cutters 2 units n/a 2 n/a n/a 35 Gasulette Lamp 4 units n/a 4 n/a n/a * n/a (no available records) Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 4. TRAININGS ATTENDED BY THE SUSIMO

# OF INCLUSIVE TRAINING TRAINORS PARTICIPANTS DATES 1 Orientation Course of SUSIMO NFDO/TA Team 5 Nov. 14-16,2000 staff of Watershed Subproject Sites 2 Orientation Workshop on the NFDO/TA Team 4 Dec. 14, 2000 implementation of a Capital-Build up System for CBFMP 3 Watershed and Mangrove NFDO/TA Team 4 Aug. 18, 2001 Orientation and other related guidelines on FSP

4 FSP Re-Orientation Course NFDO/TA Team 4 March 19-21, 2002 5 FSP Phase-out/Phase-in Planning NFDO/TA Team 4 Dec. 10-13, 2002 Workshop Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 5a. Livelihood Projects Established

Name of Livelihood Project : Consumer Store and Rice Trading

Implementor Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association-Multi- purpose Cooperative (BAWARSA- : MULCO)

No. of Beneficiaries : 441 members

Amount of investment : Php 470, 000.00

Date of Feasibility Study : Apr-02

Date started : Dec. 18, 2002

Status : On-Going

Net Income : Php 120, 000.00

CFDF : Php 2, 214, 987.75

Linkages Developed : Local Businessman/Proprietor Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 5b. Livelihood Projects Established

Name of Livelihood Project : Trucking Services (For Hire)

Implementor Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Association-Multi- purpose Cooperative (BAWARSA- : MULCO)

No. of Beneficiaries : 441 members

Amount of investment : Php 574, 625.50

Date of Feasibility Study : N/A

Date started : Dec. 2003

Status : On-Going

Net Income : Php 120, 000.00

CFDF : Php 2, 214, 987.75

Linkages Developed : N/A FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT LOAN NO. PH-P 135 Table 6. SUBPROJECT STATUS REPORT

STATUS OF PROGRESS NAME/LOCATION OF PROJECT PROJECT COST Region (O:on going C: Completion) THE SUBPROJECT AREA (ha) (mil. Peso) SMP CO CSD M & E INFRA

Bayog Watershed 9 Rehabilitation 2,520.00 85,230,389.00 c c c c c Subproject Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 7. SMP Cost Estimate per Activity

TARGET UNIT OF ACTIVITIES UNIT COST TOTAL COST OUTPUT MEASURE

I. SURVEY AND MAPPING

a. Perimeter survey, area computation, site characterization and map preparation 2,000.00 has 425.0000 850,000.00

b. Field Section and Blocking 2,000.00 has 150.00000 300,000.00

c. Present Land Use Survey and Mapping

d. Topographic Survey & Mapping

e. Soil/Land Capability Survey and Mapping

f. Agro-socio economic studies (ave. 3 household/ ha)

g. Climate, geology and water resourced survey

SUB-TOTAL 1,150,000.00

II. PLANNING 2,000.00 has 100.00 200,000.00

a. Data Synthesis and analysis

b. Report Writing

SUB-TOTAL 200,000.00

GRANDTOTAL 2,000.00 has 675.00 1,350,000.00 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 8. Community Organizing Cost Estimate Per Activity

UNIT of ACTIVITIES TARGET UNIT COST TOTAL COST MEASURE

1. Social Investigation 2,020.00 Has. 82.88 167,418.00

2. Information and 2,020.00 Has. 151.55 Education Campaign 306,127.00

3. Documentation Process

4. Identification of Possible 2,020.00 Has. 18.22 CBFMA 36,805.00

5. Organizing Activities 2,020.00 Has. 477.72 964,996.50

6. Community Activities 2,020.00 Has. 322.4 651,245.50

7. Project Management 2,020.00 Has. 386.88 781,498.90

Total 2,020.00 has 1,439.65 2,908,090.90 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 9a. Cost Estimate For Agroforestry Per Activity

UNIT OF TARGET MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT

1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION has 789.06 6,714.14 5,297,862.28 a. Nursery Site Preparation b. Planting Stock c. Bags d. Soil Collection e. Bagging SUB-TOTAL 5,297,862.28 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT has 789.06 3,940.11 3,108,981.72 a. Strip brushing/clearing b. Staking c. Hole Digging d. Hauling e. Planting SUB-TOTAL 3,108,981.72 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION has 789.06 4,340.29 3,424,749.54 a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer b. Replanting c. Patrol Works d. Tools and materials SUB-TOTAL 3,424,749.54 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First and Second Year has 789.06 597.61 471,549.35 b. Third Year has 789.06 251.30 198,291.14 c. Fourth Year has 789.06 632.14 498,793.32 d. Fifth Year has 789.06 922.53 727,930.69 d. Sixth Year has 789.06 387.25 305,563.88 SUB-TOTAL 2,202,128.38 G R A N D T O T A L has 789.06 17,785.37 14,033,721.92 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 9b. Cost Estimate for Bamboo Plantation Per Activity

UNIT OF TARGET MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT

1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION has 54.75 3,399.92 186,145.85 a. Nursery Site Preparation b. Planting Stock c. Bags d. Soil Collection e. Bagging SUB-TOTAL 186,145.85 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT has 54.75 8,649.06 473,535.92 a. Strip brushing/clearing b. Staking c. Hole Digging d. Hauling e. Planting SUB-TOTAL 473,535.92 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION has 54.75 7,001.88 383,352.89 a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer b. Replanting c. Patrol Works d. Tools and materials SUB-TOTAL 383,352.89 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First and Second Year has 54.75 6,707.38 367,228.95 b. Third Year has 54.75 1,716.35 93,970.19 c. Fourth Year has 54.75 129.58 7,094.49 d. Fifth Year has 54.75 3,265.94 178,810.20 e. Sixth Year has 54.75 632.30 34,618.56 SUB-TOTAL 681,722.39 GRAND T O T A L has 54.75 31,502.41 1,724,757.05 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 9c. Cost Estimate for Rattan Plantation Per Activity

UNIT OF TARGET MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT

1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION has 720.97 4,987.88 3,596,110.64 a. Nursery Site Preparation b. Planting Stock c. Bags d. Soil Collection e. Bagging SUB-TOTAL 3,596,110.64 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT has 720.97 3,754.39 2,706,802.56 a. Strip brushing/clearing b. Staking c. Hole Digging d. Hauling e. Planting SUB-TOTAL 2,706,802.56 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION has 720.97 7,463.70 5,381,100.27 a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer b. Replanting c. Patrol Works d. Tools and materials SUB-TOTAL 5,381,100.27 4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First and Second Year has 720.97 658.17 474,520.18 b. Third Year has 720.97 279.15 201,261.97 c. Fourth Year has 720.97 359.19 258,962.52 d. Fifth Year has 720.97 474.90 342,385.46 e. Sixth Year has 720.97 72.83 52,504.95 SUB-TOTAL 1,329,635.08 G R A N D T O T A L has 720.97 18,050.19 13,013,648.55 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 9d. Cost Estimate for Tree Plantation Per Activity

UNIT OF TARGET MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST MEASURE OUTPUT 1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION has 955.00 4,557.22 4,352,142.87 a. Nursery Site Preparation b. Planting Stock c. Bags d. Soil Collection e. Bagging SUB-TOTAL 4,352,142.87 2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT has 955.00 3,952.74 3,774,862.70 a. Strip brushing/clearing b. Staking c. Hole Digging d. Hauling e. Planting SUB-TOTAL 3,774,862.70 3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION has 955.00 11,913.63 11,377,519.25 a. Ringweeding, cultivation, fertilizer b. Replanting c. Patrol Works d. Tools and materials SUB-TOTAL 11,377,519.25 4. CSD Infrastructure a. Graded Trail meters 87,213.50 1.13 98,611.76 b. Footpath meters 87,213.50 1.13 98,611.76 c. Bunkhouse units 4.00 94,350.00 377,400.00 d. Lookout Tower units 5.00 10,680.00 53,400.99 e. Fireline/firebreak sq.m/has 177,955 sq. m/ 403,362.48 1,555.91 has. SUB-TOTAL 1,031,386.99 5. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION a. First and Second Year has 955.00 478.15 456,633.00 b. Third Year has 955.00 192.02 183,375.57 c. Fourth Year has 955.00 5,025.78 4,799,624.11 d. Fifth Year has 955.00 2,759.67 2,635,485.44 d. Sixth Year has 955.00 262.75 250,924.51 SUB-TOTAL 8,326,042.63 G R A N D T O T A L has 955.00 30,221.94 28,861,954.44 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 10. Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate Per Activity

Unit Target ACTIVITIES of Unit Cost Total Cost Output Measure Physical Validation Component

1. Development of appropriate tools for participatory M&E 2. Verification of Boundaries, UTM monuments and 2,520.00 has 37.02 93,300.00 block corner post 3. Seedling Production/Inventory Analysis 2,520.00 has 50.04 126,100.00 4. Survival Inventory (height and diameter measurements and related observations per 2,520.00 has 846.75 2,133,800.00 area/components and parcels

5. Institutional/environmental impacts/project 2,520.00 has 355.27 895,280.10 management cost and report preparation

S U B T O T A L 3,248,480.10

Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment

1. Preparatory activities 2,520.00 has 7.94 20,000.00

2. Primary data collection and preliminary 2,520.00 has 47.62 120,000.00 assessment

3. Documentation/Reports 2,520.00 has 29.76 75,000.00

S U B T O T A L 215,000.00 G R A N D T O T A L 2,520.00 has 1,374.40 3,463,480.10 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 11. Infrastructure Project

Infrastructure Project : Farm to Market Road, 1 unit Hanging Bridge and Repair of 1 Hanging Bridge(Matun-og)

Location : Brgy's. Kahayagan, Supon, Kanipaan, and Matun-og, Bayog, Zamboanga, Del Sur

Contractor : YSL Builders

Contract Cost : Php 19, 013, 561.20

Contract Duration : February 11, 2002 to May 11, 2003

Effectivity of Notice to proceed : 11-Feb-02

Expected Completion date : 30-Jun-03

Revised Completion date : 30-Aug-03

Date of MOA with LGU : 15-Oct-03

Brief description : The infrastructure project implemented is Farm to Market Road Rehabilitation from Barangay's Kahayagan, Supon and Kanipaan, having a length of 6.76 Km., Construction of 1 unit hanging bridge at Barangay Kanipaan (Sitio Licanan) and Repair of 1 unit existing Hanging Bridge at Barangay Matun-og with a total lenght of 100 and 70 meters, respectively. The contract of YSL Builders (Infrastructure Contractor) was extended three (3) times due to negative slippage and Backlogs (due to rainy season). The contract was extended first on June 30, 2003, second on July 27, 2003, and third and last is on August 30, 2003. Finally it was turned-over to LGU on October 15, 2003. Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 12. Annual Work and Financial Plan

Planned Actual ACTIVITIES Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP) 675.00 1,350,000.00 675.00 1,350,000.00 B. Community Organizing (Phase 1 & 2) 2,752.17 5,559,378.00 1,439.65 2,908,091.90 C. Comprehensive Site Development (CSD) 252,577.20 1. ) Delineation, Landuse Survey and Mapping 608,596.96 2.) Soil Erosion Control (SWC) a. Infrastructure b. Trails and Footh Path c. Plantation c.1 Riverbank Protection 3.) Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry 6,625.40 3,643,970.40 17,785.37 14,033,721.92 b. Assisted Natural Regenetration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation d.1. Bamboo 28,019.79 1,485,048.76 31,502.41 1,724,757.05 d.2. Rattan 14,085.60 10,099,378.40 18,050.19 13,013,648.55 d.3. Mangrove d.3.1 Enrichment Planting d.3.2 Nipa Plantation d.4. Plantation Species (Refo. Spp) 14,744.37 10,321,062.44 28,537.73 28,861,954.44 e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project Sub-Total 12,648.25 25,549,460.00 23,029.63 58,495,256.12 D. Infrastructure Component 19,013,561.20 19,013,561.20 E. Monitoring and Evaluation a. Year 1 b. Year 2 c. Year 3 d. Year 4 Sub-Total 1,718.59 3,471,560.00 1,374.40 3,463,480.10 II. SUSIMO 2,283,240.00 2,082,553.92 Equipment Provided to the Office Researches Conducted Trainings Others

Sub-Total 2,283,240.00 2,283,240.00 GRAND TOTAL 57,227,199.20 87,513,629.32 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 12. Annual Work and Financial Plan

1995 1996 ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP) 2,000.00 1,350,000.00 2,000.00 1,350,000.00 B. Community Organizing (Phase 1 & 2) C. Comprehensive Site Development (CSD) 1. ) Delineation, Landuse Survey and Mapping 2.) Soil Erosion Control (SWC) a. Infrastructure b. Trails and Footh Path c. Plantation c.1 Riverbank Protection 3.) Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry b. Assisted Natural Regenetration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation d.1. Bamboo d.2. Rattan d.3. Mangrove d.3.1 Enrichment Planting d.3.2 Nipa Plantation d.4. Plantation Species (Refo. Spp) e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project Sub-Total D. Infrastructure Component E. Monitoring and Evaluation a. Year 1 b. Year 2 c. Year 3 d. Year 4 Sub-Total II. SUSIMO Equipment Provided to the Office Researches Conducted Trainings Others

Sub-Total GRAND TOTAL 1,350,000.00 1,350,000.00 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 12. Annual Work and Financial Plan

1997 1998 ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP) B. Community Organizing (Phase 1 & 2) 2,020.00 2,181,600.00 2,020.00 523,343.30 2,020.00 478,369.00 C. Comprehensive Site Development (CSD) 252,577.20 1. ) Delineation, Landuse Survey and Mapping 2.) Soil Erosion Control (SWC) a. Infrastructure b. Trails and Footh Path c. Plantation c.1 Riverbank Protection 3.) Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry 550.00 2,197,948.32 437.47 1,217,283.00 100.26 890,711.92 b. Assisted Natural Regenetration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation d.1. Bamboo 53.00 826,083.08 39.75 512,042.79 54.75 126,489.57 d.2. Rattan 717.00 6,927,501.32 441.75 2,058,211.08 70.80 486,518.99 d.3. Mangrove d.3.1 Enrichment Planting d.3.2 Nipa Plantation d.4. Plantation Species (Refo. Spp) 700.00 6,162,945.36 575.00 3,442,093.67 50.30 537,767.00 e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project Sub-Total 2,294,064.68 D. Infrastructure Component E. Monitoring and Evaluation a. Year 1 b. Year 2 c. Year 3 d. Year 4 Sub-Total II. SUSIMO Equipment Provided to the Office Researches Conducted Trainings Others

Sub-Total GRAND TOTAL 18,296,078.08 523,343.30 7,229,630.54 2,772,433.68 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 12. Annual Work and Financial Plan

1999 2000 ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP) B. Community Organizing (Phase 1 & 2) 2,020.00 1,454,400.00 2,020.00 168,980.00 2,020.00 1,923,378.00 2,020.00 1,376,956.10 C. Comprehensive Site Development (CSD) 1. ) Delineation, Landuse Survey and Mapping 517,484.00 2.) Soil Erosion Control (SWC) a. Infrastructure b. Trails and Footh Path c. Plantation c.1 Riverbank Protection 3.) Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry 112.51 228,739.08 452.89 834,899.87 1,219,064.89 b. Assisted Natural Regenetration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation d.1. Bamboo 13.25 146,922.89 414,520.54 809,319.27 d.2. Rattan 275.25 1,113,666.00 650.17 4,485,055.33 3,714,350.74 d.3. Mangrove d.3.1 Enrichment Planting d.3.2 Nipa Plantation d.4. Plantation Species (Refo. Spp) 125.00 716,023.41 804.92 2,255,623.25 5,113,709.57 e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project Sub-Total 7,990,098.99 11,373,928.47 D. Infrastructure Component E. Monitoring and Evaluation a. Year 1 b. Year 2 c. Year 3 d. Year 4 Sub-Total 2,020.00 1,636,200.00 2,020.00 1,628,120.10 II. SUSIMO 356, 000.00 Equipment Provided to the Office Researches Conducted Trainings Others

Sub-Total 356,000.00 GRAND TOTAL 3,659,751.38 8,159,078.99 3,915,578.00 14,379,004.67 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 12. Annual Work and Financial Plan

2001 2002 ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP) B. Community Organizing (Phase 1 & 2) 360,443.50 C. Comprehensive Site Development (CSD) 1. ) Delineation, Landuse Survey and Mapping 2.) Soil Erosion Control (SWC) a. Infrastructure b. Trails and Footh Path c. Plantation c.1 Riverbank Protection 3.) Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry 235.91 4,492,346.71 5,476,450.57 b. Assisted Natural Regenetration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation d.1. Bamboo 53,763.11 d.2. Rattan 1,602,315.68 2,040,666.58 d.3. Mangrove d.3.1 Enrichment Planting d.3.2 Nipa Plantation d.4. Plantation Species (Refo. Spp) 120.00 9,953,890.73 6,898,138.65 e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project Sub-Total 16,102,316.23 14,415,255.80 D. Infrastructure Component 8,105,620.94 E. Monitoring and Evaluation a. Year 1 b. Year 2 c. Year 3 d. Year 4 Sub-Total 2,520.00 1,620,360.00 2,520.00 1,620,360.00 II. SUSIMO 470, 000.00 645,406.09 577, 000.00 850,787.66 Equipment Provided to the Office Researches Conducted Trainings Others

Sub-Total 470,000.00 645,406.09 577,000.00 850,787.66 GRAND TOTAL 470,000.00 17,108,165.82 2,197,360.00 24,992,024.40 Forestry Sector Project Loan No. Ph-P 135 Table 12. Annual Work and Financial Plan

2003 Planned (TOTAL) Actual (TOTAL) ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget

I. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM A. Survey, Mapping and Planning (SMP) 2,000.00 1,350,000.00 2,000.00 1,350,000.00 B. Community Organizing (Phase 1 & 2) 2,020.00 5,559,378.00 2,020.00 2,908,091.90 C. Comprehensive Site Development (CSD) 252,577.20 1. ) Delineation, Landuse Survey and Mapping 91,112.96 608,596.96 2.) Soil Erosion Control (SWC) a. Infrastructure b. Trails and Footh Path c. Plantation c.1 Riverbank Protection 3.) Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) a. Agroforestry 1,120,247.96 550.00 3,643,970.40 789.06 14,033,721.92 b. Assisted Natural Regenetration c. Enrichment Planting d. Tree Plantation d.1. Bamboo 320,664.56 53.00 1,485,048.76 54.75 1,724,757.05 d.2. Rattan 684,741.23 717.00 10,099,378.40 720.97 13,013,648.55 d.3. Mangrove d.3.1 Enrichment Planting d.3.2 Nipa Plantation d.4. Plantation Species (Refo. Spp) 4,102,825.24 700.00 10,321,062.44 955.22 28,861,954.44 e. Timber Stand Improvement 4. Inventory Residual Forest 5. Income Enhancement Project Sub-Total 6,319,591.95 2,020.00 25,549,460.00 2,520.00 58,495,256.12 D. Infrastructure Component 10,907,940.26 19,013,561.20 19,013,561.20 E. Monitoring and Evaluation a. Year 1 b. Year 2 c. Year 3 d. Year 4 Sub-Total 215,000.00 215,000.00 2,020.00 3,471,560.00 2,520.00 3,463,480.10 II. SUSIMO 880, 240.00 787,046.25 2,283,240.00 2,082,553.92 Equipment Provided to the Office Researches Conducted Trainings Others

Sub-Total 880,240.00 787,046.25 2,283,240.00 2,283,240.00 GRAND TOTAL 1,095,240.00 18,229,578.46 57,227,199.20 87,513,629.32 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART AGRO-FORESTRY TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION, INC. (M & E Contractor)

ANTONIO T. LAO President

CELERINO H. ESTEMO Vice-President

PUBLIC AUDITOR TREASURER SECRETARY RELATION OFFICER

MEMBERS

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART SUMMER DEVELOPERS ASSOCIATION, INC. (M & E Contractor)

REMUS B. BERSAMIN Operation Manager

SECRETARY

ANTONIO T. LAO Assistant Operation

Manager

RITA GENTILLES JULIET B. BERSAMIN

Auditor Treasurer

Project ID & Organizing Project Project Selection Unit Unit Supervision Monitoring

Unit Unit

OFFICE STAFF

LABOR FORCE

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART TECHNOLOGICAL ADVOCATES FOR AGRO-FORESTS PROGRAMS ASSOCIATION, INC. (CO Contractor)

Board of Directors

Legal Consultant

Executive Director/President

Executive Assistant

Technical Administrative Training Support

Support Staff Support Staff Staff

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COORDINATORS

Community Survey, Mapping and Community Based Organizing -FLMA Planning (SMP) Forest Management Program

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE TUNGAWAN AGRO-FOREST PLANTERS ASSOCIATION, INC. (SMP Contractor)

Board of Directors

Legal Consultant

Executive Director/President

Executive Assistant

Technical Administrative Training Support Staff

Support Staff Support Staff

Project Development

Managers

Project Development Coordinator

CO-FLMA SMP CBFMP

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART BAYOG WATERSHED REHABILITATION SUBPROJECT ASSOCIATION, INC. (BAWARSA, INC.)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY

Board of Trustees

(Per Barangay)

PO President

PO Vice -President

Fin. & Appr. Education For. Prot. Grievance Com. Com. Com. Com.

Seedlings Infra. Livelihood M & P Com. Com. Com. Com.

CPO Fund Fire Prot. CBU fund CFDF Com. Com. Com. Com.

Administrative Unit Technical Unit

Admin. Officer Technical Head

Secretary Auditor Treasurer Survey Team Mon. & Eval. Team

Bookkeeper Encoder Survey Aide

Utility Security Guard

BAWARSAMULCO

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ZAMBOANGA (BAYOG) UNIFIED GREEN MOVEMENT, INC. (CO Contractor)

Project Manager

Secretary

Assistant Project Manager

Community Organizing

Supervisor

Community Community

Organizer Organizer

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE YSL BUILDERS (Infrastructure Contractor)

ERNESTO A. MONDARTE Project Manager

ARNOLD CUIZON ROY JOSE S. QUIMADA Surveyor/Quantity Administrative Officer Engineer

REMEGIO QUIMADA NELSON DAIS NOEH PATALINGHUG

Safety Engineer Equipment Project/Material

Supervisor Engineer

Operators/Drivers ARMANDO TAC-AN Materials Lab.

Chief Mechanic Technicians

Skilled/Semi-Skilled Hel pers Helpers Laborers

Unskilled Laborers

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE GREENSHIELD ASSOCIATION, INC. (M & E Contractor)8

Board of Directors

Internal Auditor Board Secretary

Board Treasurer

President

Administrative Staff Executive Secretary

Research, IEC CO & Networking Special & Evaluation Livelihood and Linkages Concerns

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE SUBPROJECT SITE MANAGEMENT OFFICE (SUSIMO) Bayog Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject

CELERINA D. FLORES Subproject Management Officer

LEO VILLARUBEN ROMEO PAGENTE COSU-HEAD SDMU-HEAD

JOEL REALIZA MARCELINO MALUNOC SDMU-STAFF VBU-HEAD

YULBRANDO YLLAYA MYRNA VILLARUBEN VBU-STAFF ASU-HEAD

EFLIDA ROMERO VBU-STAFF RAMON FABIAN SUSIMO-DRIVER IEC conducted in Poblacion and Kahayagan, Bayog, Zamboanga del Sur

New completed Hanging Bridged Rehabilitation of Farm to Market Road with the installation of steel reinforcement and box culvert.

Rattan Plantation at Brgy. Dagum Gmelina plantation inspected by DENR inspection team. Agroforestry Plantation Mahogany plantation

Ring weeding and Fertilizer application conducted by PO personnel.

Sampling activity conducted by Re- gional personnel and SUSIMO staff

Lookout tower located at Consumer Store of BAWARSAMULCO. Brgy. Kanipaan. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Bayog Watershed Subproject

Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 1-2 N 1 ° 35 ' W 1,302.75 2-3 N 35 ° 9 ' E 857.89 3-4 N 47 ° 51 ' W 336.10 4-5 S 36 ° 16 ' W 223.01 5-6 N 60 ° 24 ' W 1,520.12 6-7 N 30 ° 49 ' W 783.60 7-8 N 37 ° 39 ' E 668.11 8-9 N 9 ° 55 ' E 933.78 9-10 N 24 ° 27 ' E 972.02 10-11 N 24 ° 45 ' E 2,101.52 11-12 N 33 ° 7 ' E 946.85 12-13 S 33 ° 34 ' E 340.24 13-14 N 80 ° 32 ' E 271.15 14-15 N 21 ° 38 ' W 435.99 15-16 N 20 ° 49 ' E 816.73 16-17 N 16 ° 4 ' E 818.83 17-18 N 25 ° 9 ' E 513.76 18-19 N 87 ° 22 ' E 232.06 19-20 N 41 ° 50 ' E 370.32 20-21 S 82 ° 29 ' E 369.07 21-22 S 56 ° 42 ' E 454.47 22-23 S 8 ° 29 ' E 549.33 23-24 S 5 ° 39 ' E 995.89 24-25 S 57 ° 13 ' E 558.31 25-26 S 13 ° 4 ' W 224.26 26-27 S 19 ° 29 ' E 517.76 27-28 S 4 ° 27 ' W 472.16 28-29 S 33 ° 8 ' W 342.78 29-30 S 9 ° 49 ' W 411.77 30-31 S 20 ° 54 ' E 404.63 31-32 S 11 ° 15 ' W 419.86 32-33 S 13 ° 51 ' E 422.32 33-34 S 33 ° 2 ' W 678.30 34-35 S 9 ° 15 ' W 1,090.31 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Bayog Watershed Subproject

Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 35-36 S 88 ° 54 ' W 352.42 36-37 S 22 ° 55 ' W 390.27 37-38 S 9 ° 33 ' E 909.25 38-39 S 12 ° 26 ' W 691.77 39-40 S 21 ° 35 ' W 733.56 40-41 S 24 ° 41 ' W 1,190.34 41-42 S 64 ° 13 ' W 891.92 42-43 S 24 ° 15 ' E 269.43 43-44 S 43 ° 4 ' W 1,094.54 44-45 S 55 ° 42 ' W 863.44 45-46 S 4 ° 22 ' E 856.36 46-47 N 85 ° 2 ' W 396.75 47-48 S 28 ° 33 ' W 346.74 48-49 S 71 ° 32 ' E 552.49 49-50 S 18 ° 46 ' W 519.76 50-51 S 45 ° 36 ' W 971.14 51-52 S 12 ° 13 ' W 1,416.26 52-53 S 72 ° 56 ' W 482.16 53-54 S 82 ° 6 ' W 586.21 54-55 S 76 ° 31 ' W 672.04 55-56 N 52 ° 57 ' W 780.74 56-57 S 87 ° 24 ' W 803.53 57-58 S 15 ° 29 ' W 168.88 58-59 N 34 ° 6 ' W 487.39 59-60 N 60 ° 4 ' W 272.49 60-61 N 0 ° 52 ' E 582.38 61-62 N 24 ° 47 ' E 817.70 62-63 N 27 ° 52 ' E 897.97 63-61 N 38 ° 59 ' E 900.59 64-65 N 48 ° 12 ' E 844.81 65-66 N 65 ° 29 ' E 627.11 66-67 S 86 ° 43 ' E 311.12 67-68 N 44 ° 19 ' E 873.77 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Bayog Watershed Subproject

Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter) 68-69 S 78 ° 4 ' E 344.44 69-70 N 50 ° 44 ' E 580.09 70-1 N 67 ° 50 ' E 986.75 Reference point: Corner 1: long-X 123 ° 5 ' 20 " lat-Y 7 52 ' 49 "