The New Photography of Crewdson, Gursky and Wall

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The New Photography of Crewdson, Gursky and Wall University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Master's Theses Graduate School 2011 CONSTRUCTING THE REAL: THE NEW PHOTOGRAPHY OF CREWDSON, GURSKY AND WALL Melissa A. Schwartz University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Schwartz, Melissa A., "CONSTRUCTING THE REAL: THE NEW PHOTOGRAPHY OF CREWDSON, GURSKY AND WALL" (2011). University of Kentucky Master's Theses. 97. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_theses/97 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF THESIS CONSTRUCTING THE REAL: THE NEW PHOTOGRAPHY OF CREWDSON, GURSKY AND WALL A new class of photographs that relies on digital processes, best exemplified by the works of Gregory Crewdson, Andreas Gursky and Jeff Wall all exhibit a ‘not quite right’ quality that calls into question some of the most closely held truisms of photographic thought. Through novel technological processes combined with the elements of the new photography—new scale, fabulist imagery, and implied narrative—these images challenge the nature of photography as a documentary process and, beyond that, the nature of what we understand to be ‘the real’ that is supposedly documented. A visual analysis of these images through the lens of Roland Barthes’ and Susan Stewart’s scholarship reveals truths about these images and about photography as a medium. What these elements, this ‘lack of rightness’, can tell us about photography and its position as documentary medium can help us better understand the nature of contemporary photography as a truly creative medium rather than a documentation of the real. These artists are engaging in a discourse of artifice, questioning the position of photographs as documents of how it was, revealing that not only is their work not a documentation of the world as it is, but that photography never was. KEYWORDS: Digital Photography, Roland Barthes, Gregory Crewdson, Andreas Gursky, Jeff Wall Multimedia Elements Used: JPEG (jpg) Melissa A. Schwartz March 08, 2011 _ Constructing the Real: The New Photography of Crewdson, Gursky and Wall By Melissa A. Schwartz __Robert Jensen_______________ Director of Thesis _Dennis Carpenter____________ Director of Graduate Studies _March 08, 2011 _ RULES FOR THE USE OF THESES Unpublished theses submitted for the Master’s degree and deposited in the University of Kentucky Library are as a rule open for inspection, but are to be used only with due regard to the rights of the authors. Bibliographical references may be noted, but quotations or summaries of parts may be published only with the permission of the author, and with the usual scholarly acknowledgements. Extensive copying or publication of the thesis in whole or in part also requires the consent of the Dean of the Graduate School of the University of Kentucky. A library that borrows this thesis for use by its patrons is expected to secure the signature of each user. Name Date ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ THESIS Melissa A. Schwartz The Graduate School University of Kentucky 2011 CONSTRUCTING THE REAL: THE NEW PHOTOGRAPHY OF CREWDSON, GURSKY AND WALL _____________________________________________ THESIS _____________________________________________ A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the College of Fine Arts at the University of Kentucky By Melissa A. Schwartz Lexington, Kentucky Director: Dr. Robert Jensen, Professor of Art History Lexington, Kentucky 2011 Copyright © Melissa A. Schwartz 2011 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support of a number of wonderful people. Firstly, I would like to thank my thesis advisor Dr. Robert Jensen. No one could ask for a more insightful and exuberant mentor. Committee members DGS Dennis “Bones” Carpenter and Dr. Ania Brzyski came together with Dr. Jensen to form my dream team of three who both individually and collectively, provided me with insights that challenged my thinking, substantially improving not only this paper but also influencing my approach and attitude towards life. I also want to thank so many other fabulous friends, and colleagues, including Dr. Benjamin C. Withers, Dr. Jane Peters, and Cynthia D. Clark for providing answers to questions I didn’t know to ask. I cannot forget the always-lovely Fine Arts girl gang comprised of Joyce Rife, Jane Andrus, Tonya Brooks, Lesley Chapman, Susan Hemmingson, and Rebecca Amsler for without their witty banter I’m not sure I would have made it through the insanity. In addition, my dear friends Gwenda Bond and Christopher Rowe have always provided that proverbial port in the storm. Thank you. I would also like to thank my family: my parents, Mary Ann Koropchak and Arthur E. Schwartz; my extended parents Marilyn Gilroy, Thomas J. Koropchak, Glenda Moorer, Dr. C. Alan Moorer, and Dr. Sally Hamilton; as well as, my sister and brother-in- law Vanessa and Max Flannery, and brother Josh Koropchak for helping me formulate this creation known as ‘me’ and for the encouragement to see this project to fruition. My partner, Melissa Moorer, provided on-going support throughout this process, as well as thoughtful quality control essential for completing this project. As always, she is truly my inspiration and no, Melissa, you will not have to read this one more time. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments............................................................................................................... iii List of Figures.......................................................................................................................v I. Introduction The trouble with some photographs.............................................................................1 Current literature..........................................................................................................3 Nostalgia ....................................................................................................................15 II. This image is not a photograph ......................................................................................21 New scale...................................................................................................................22 Photography’s evolving practices and the new scale........................................25 Technology—evolution of process as integral to the new scale.......................28 Fantastical / fabulist imagery.....................................................................................36 We’re only after one single perfect moment.....................................................37 Implied narrative........................................................................................................44 III. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................55 Bibliography .......................................................................................................................57 Vita......................................................................................................................................60 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure II.1, Gregory Crewdson, Untitled, (Figure II.2) 1998-2002, ‘Twilight’ Series, Shown as processed through an ASCII filter (http://www.glassgiant.com/ascii/). http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_lJX6gvbjS- 0/TKqZeEo7f6I/AAAAAAAAAHA/SfMoFpXiw_A/s1600/Gregory+Crewdson+2.jpg……….51 Figure II.2, Gregory Crewdson, Untitled, (Figure II.2) 1998-2002, ‘Twilight’ Series, http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_lJX6gvbjS- 0/TKqZeEo7f6I/AAAAAAAAAHA/SfMoFpXiw_A/s1600/Gregory+Crewdson+2.jpg……….51 Figure II.3, Gregory Crewdson, Untitled, 2003-2005, ‘Beneath the Roses’ Series, 144.8 x 223.5 cm, Digital C-print. http://www.fotomuseum.ch/presse/0606_GC/04.BeneathTheRoses,300dpi.jpg………………...52 Figure II.4, Jeff Wall, A View from an Apartment, 2004-2005, 167 x 244 cm, Transparency in lightbox. http://www.tate.org.uk/images/cms/12851w_wall1.jpg……………………………………...52 Figure II.5, Jeff Wall, In Front of a Nightclub, 2006, 226 x 360.8 cm, Transparency in lightbox. http://db-artmag.com/archiv/assets/images/561/34.jpg Collection of the Pilara Family Foundation………………………………...……………….53 Figure II.6, Andreas Gursky, 99 Cent., 1999, 207 x 337 cm. http://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2001/gursky/images/99cent_pop.jpg………….53 Figure II.7, Andreas Gursky, Kuwait Stock Exchange, 2007, 295.1 x 222 cm. http://static.royalacademy.org.uk/images/width270/screen-shot-2010-11-09-at-12-39-32-
Recommended publications
  • Exhibition Checklist
    Updated Wednesday, September 7, 2016 | 3:35:37 PM Last updated Wednesday, September 7, 2016 Updated Wednesday, September 7, 2016 | 3:35:37 PM National Gallery of Art, Press Office 202.842.6353 fax: 202.789.3044 National Gallery of Art, Press Office 202.842.6353 fax: 202.789.3044 Photography Reinvented: The Collection of Robert E. Meyerhoff and Rheda Becker September 30, 2016 - March 5, 2017 To order publicity images: Publicity images are available only for those objects accompanied by a thumbnail image below. Please email [email protected] or fax (202) 789-3044 and designate your desired images, using the “File Name” on this list. Please include your name and contact information, press affiliation, deadline for receiving images, the date of publication, and a brief description of the kind of press coverage planned. Links to download the digital image files will be sent via e-mail. Usage: Images are provided exclusively to the press, and only for purposes of publicity for the duration of the exhibition at the National Gallery of Art. All published images must be accompanied by the credit line provided and with copyright information, as noted. Important: The images displayed on this page are for reference only and are not to be reproduced in any media. File Name: 3993-001.jpg John Baldessari Conductor/Pianist/Orchestra (Red/Yellow/Blue), 1995/2007 inkjet print with acrylic paint, printed 2007 framed: 181.29 × 251.14 × 6.03 cm (71 3/8 × 98 7/8 × 2 3/8 in.) Promised Gift from the Collection of Robert E.
    [Show full text]
  • Andreas Gursky September 12–November 14, 2020 Sprüth Magers, Berlin
    Press Release Andreas Gursky September 12–November 14, 2020 Sprüth Magers, Berlin Monika Sprüth and Philomene Magers are pleased to present a substantial exhibition of new photographs by Andreas Gursky, his first new body of work in almost three years, in which he takes up a range of themes that he has investigated for decades. Despite the continuity in theme and subject matter—our built environment, humankind’s impact on the natural world—the new pictures embed his analyses in current events, offering altered settings and situations to explore. Rhine III (2018) revisits his important work Rhine II (1999)—the dimensions, setting and composition of both are all almost identical. And yet, just twenty years later, the mood is drastically altered. The drought of summer 2018 reduced the river to a record low, and the new picture offers a dystopian vision of the once flourishing river landscape. Cruise (2020) also brings to mind an important earlier work, Paris, Montparnasse (1993). The same grid-like structure appears, but instead of a large apartment building, here there are hundreds of windows on the side of an enormous cruise ship. As with the Paris picture, Cruise shows a human environment atomized into a modernist grid. Politik II (2020) directly follows Gursky's work Rückblick (2015), also included in the exhibition, to create a new series that looks at political structures. Over a period of several months, Gursky closely observed the activities of the members of parliament in the German Bundestag. Politik II features thirteen politicians in animated conversations, the figures filling the entire width of the picture.
    [Show full text]
  • ANDREAS GURSKY Education Solo Exhibitions
    ANDREAS GURSKY 1955 Born in Leipzig, Germany Lives and works in Düsseldorf Education 1981–87 Kunstakademie, Düsseldorf 1978–81 Folkwang University of the Arts, Essen, Germany Solo exhibitions 2020 Museum der bildenden Künste Leipzig, Germany Sprueth Magers, Berlin 2019 Gagosian, Tarmak 22, Gstaad Saanen Airport, Gstaad Andreas Gursky - Photographs 1995-2007, Espace Louis Vuitton Beijing 2018 White Cube, London Hayward Gallery, London 2017 Bangkok, Gagosian Gallery, Rome 2016 Not Abstract II, Gagosian, New York Andreas Gursky: nicht abstrakt, K20, Düsseldorf 2015 Museum Frieder Burda, Baden-Baden, Germany Andreas Gursky: Landscapes, Parrish Art Museum, Water Mill, New York 2014 White Cube, London Andreas Gursky: Early Landscapes, Sprüth Magers, London The National Museum of Art, Osaka 2013 Galerie Rüdiger Schöttle (with Jeff Wall), Munich The National Art Center, Tokyo 2012 Stiftung Museum Kunstpalast, Düsseldorf Louisiana Museum of Modern Art, Humlebaek, Denmark Gagosian, Hong Kong 2011 Gagosian, New York 2010 Gagosian, Los Angeles Sprüth Magers, Berlin 2009 Werke/Works 80-08, Vancouver Art Gallery Moderna Museet, Stockholm 2008 Matthew Marks Gallery, New York National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne Werke/Works 80-08, Museum Haus Lange and Haus Esters, Krefeld, Germany Mathildenhöhe, Darmstadt, Germany Andreas Gursky’s Personal Exhibition, Cultural Foundation Ekaterina, Moscow Centre d’Arts et de Nature, Chaumont-sur-Loire, France Pinchuk Art Centre, Kiev Museum für Moderne Kunst, Frankfurt 2007 Kunstmuseum Basel Matthew Marks Gallery,
    [Show full text]
  • Andreas Gursky's Photos Visually Articulate
    Los Angeles Times October 17, 2015 GAGOSIAN GALLERY Andreas Gursky’s photos visually articulate the world around us, framing modern society Geoff Dyer Andreas Gursky’s “99 Cent,” an exploration of repetition, consumerism and color. (© 2015 Andreas Gursky / VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn/The Broad Foundation) Either way, from 1938 onwards, when “American Photographs” was published and exhibited at the Museum of Modern Art, this was how America came to look — and what we looked for in America. Documentation doubled as creation. Not just the creation of an observed world but of the terms and criterion by which the results would be judged. And the look was not simply aesthetic; despite Evans’ famous claim to the contrary — “NO POLITICS whatever” — it framed, described and reflected larger ideological, economic and political forces that had created the Depression. With a little adjustment and the odd inversion — for Depression read boom — much of the above can be transferred directly to Andreas Gursky. These days, we routinely find ourselves walking or driving through a Gursky world. That world may have been there — logically, must have been there — before he photographed it, but I, for one, was not conscious that it looked like this. Which seems surprising, given how readily we recognized his ability to visually articulate the world around us, and how frequent the experience of stepping inside or inhabiting a Gursky turns out to be. Naturally, you don’t have to be in the exact same places that the German photographer has photographed in order to have this experience. In fact, you don’t even need to have seen an actual Gursky.
    [Show full text]
  • Ffdoespieszak Pieszak CRITICAL REALISM in CONTEMPORARY ART by Alexandra Oliver BFA, Ryerson University, 2005 MA, University of E
    CRITICAL REALISM IN CONTEMPORARY ART by Alexandra Oliver BFA, Ryerson University, 2005 MA, University of Essex, 2007 MA, University of Pittsburgh, 2009 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts & Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2014 FfdoesPieszak Pieszak UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Alexandra Oliver It was defended on April 1, 2014 and approved by Terry Smith, Andrew W. Mellon Professor of Contemporary Art History and Theory, History of Art & Architecture Barbara McCloskey, Associate Professor, History of Art & Architecture Daniel Morgan, Associate Professor, Department of Cinema and Media Studies, University of Chicago Dissertation Advisor: Josh Ellenbogen, Associate Professor, History of Art & Architecture ii Copyright © by Alexandra Oliver 2014 iii CRITICAL REALISM IN CONTEMPORARY ART Alexandra Oliver, Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh, 2014 This study responds to the recent reappearance of realism as a viable, even urgent, critical term in contemporary art. Whereas during the height of postmodern semiotic critique, realism was taboo and documentary could only be deconstructed, today both are surprisingly vital. Nevertheless, recent attempts to recover realism after poststructuralism remain fraught, bound up with older epistemological and metaphysical concepts. This study argues instead for a “critical realism” that is oriented towards problems of ethics, intersubjectivity, and human rights. Rather than conceiving of realism as “fit” or identity between representation and reality, it is treated here as an articulation of difference, otherness and non-identity. This new concept draws on the writings of curator Okwui Enwezor, as well as German critical theory, to analyze the work of three artists: Ian Wallace (b.
    [Show full text]
  • 329 Sterbak F
    art press 350 dossier Still Images for Rethin the World Dominique Baqué If it’s November it must be Photo Month. As Jean-Luc Monterosso, director of the Maison Européenne de la Photographie, points out in this special section, this big Parisian event is now being emulated far and wide. But November is also the month of Paris Photo at the Carrousel du Louvre (November 13 to 16), a rich fair that usually offers a fine harvest of discoveries. Those with an interest in the more technical side of photography will find some thoughts con cerning the fragility of prints and the complexity of their conservation in the ar ticle by Anne Cartier-Bresson. As for Maja Hoffmann, who over the years has be come a key figure at the Arles photography festival, she talks to Bernard Marcelis about her plans—and not only in the realm of photography—for her Luma Foun dation, soon to be heaquartered in Arles in a building designed by Frank Gehry. Final ly, in the text here, Dominique Baqué considers recent trends in photography and its current status, and looks at ways in which some of its exponents are using the still image to analyze current realities by creating new forms of fiction. If one of the key concerns of modernism was the dogged struggle do keep the work of art from contamination by the mass media industry, and thus to preserve its autonomy, aura and purity, then the 1980s finally put paid to its hopes of success. The extension of photography into the field of the visual arts played no small part in this.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiences of Place in the Work of Ed Ruscha and Andreas Gursky
    ACCESS: CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN EDUCATION 2010, VOL. 29, NO. 1, 10–20 Destination anywhere: Experiences of place in the work of Ed Ruscha and Andreas Gursky Kristen Sharp RMIT University ABSTRACT This paper examines how the meaning of place and identification with place can be produced through photographic images of the city. As an aesthetic, social and cultural practice, photography provides a way of imagining place and a means of knowing and classifying the urban spaces. Photographic images of the city can be understood as a form of aesthetic knowledge production, which represents and enacts the experiences of the urban environment. The urban spaces imaged by artists Ed Ruscha and Andreas Gursky, in the 1960s and 1990s respectively, actively represent and perform the symbolic and material properties of urban spaces. By exploring the ways that these artists read and map city spaces and how they articulate an experience of the city that engages with the identification of place, an argument is presented about how this process and imaging can be situated in relation to anthropological and geographic concepts of place. More specifically, what this paper explores is how their work demonstrates a sense of place that is complex and mobile, which can oscillate between notions of site specificity, identification and non- place as defined by Marc Augé. The significance of place in a global world In recognition of contemporary processes of globalisation there has been reconsideration of the meanings of space and place in a period defined by “time-space compression” (Harvey, 1990) and flows of people, objects and ideas (Urry, 2000, 2003; Appadurai, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Notable Photographers Updated 3/12/19
    Arthur Fields Photography I Notable Photographers updated 3/12/19 Walker Evans Alec Soth Pieter Hugo Paul Graham Jason Lazarus John Divola Romuald Hazoume Julia Margaret Cameron Bas Jan Ader Diane Arbus Manuel Alvarez Bravo Miroslav Tichy Richard Prince Ansel Adams John Gossage Roger Ballen Lee Friedlander Naoya Hatakeyama Alejandra Laviada Roy deCarava William Greiner Torbjorn Rodland Sally Mann Bertrand Fleuret Roe Etheridge Mitch Epstein Tim Barber David Meisel JH Engstrom Kevin Bewersdorf Cindy Sherman Eikoh Hosoe Les Krims August Sander Richard Billingham Jan Banning Eve Arnold Zoe Strauss Berenice Abbot Eugene Atget James Welling Henri Cartier-Bresson Wolfgang Tillmans Bill Sullivan Weegee Carrie Mae Weems Geoff Winningham Man Ray Daido Moriyama Andre Kertesz Robert Mapplethorpe Dawoud Bey Dorothea Lange uergen Teller Jason Fulford Lorna Simpson Jorg Sasse Hee Jin Kang Doug Dubois Frank Stewart Anna Krachey Collier Schorr Jill Freedman William Christenberry David La Spina Eli Reed Robert Frank Yto Barrada Thomas Roma Thomas Struth Karl Blossfeldt Michael Schmelling Lee Miller Roger Fenton Brent Phelps Ralph Gibson Garry Winnogrand Jerry Uelsmann Luigi Ghirri Todd Hido Robert Doisneau Martin Parr Stephen Shore Jacques Henri Lartigue Simon Norfolk Lewis Baltz Edward Steichen Steven Meisel Candida Hofer Alexander Rodchenko Viviane Sassen Danny Lyon William Klein Dash Snow Stephen Gill Nathan Lyons Afred Stieglitz Brassaï Awol Erizku Robert Adams Taryn Simon Boris Mikhailov Lewis Baltz Susan Meiselas Harry Callahan Katy Grannan Demetrius
    [Show full text]
  • Andreas Gursky's Monumental Photographs: the Media Nowa
    JUST WHAT IS IT THAT MAKES GURSKY’S PHOTOS SO DIFFERENT, SO APPEALING? 1 ON ANDREAS GURSKY’S PICTORIAL STRATEGY AND THE EMBLEMATIC NATURE OF HIS ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHS RALF BEIL 2 Andreas Gursky’s monumental photographs: The media nowa - phy have since then never stood still. Is it also just coincidence approach whose intention is nothing less than to find the one, Frankfurt, 2007), exchanges ( Tokyo Stock Exchange, 1990; Hong days uses them as eye-catchers (fig. 1); avant-garde scholars use that Thomas Demand’s C-print Wand (Mural), made in 1999 (fig. universal image that contains in compressed form all the values Kong Stock Exchange, 1994; Chicago Board of Trade I, 1997; 15 them as pictorial arguments to strengthen their thrust when diag - 3), serves as eye-catcher in the artist’s home, a loft designed by of civilized existence.” Chicago Board of Trade II, 1999; Kuwait Stock Exchange, 2007), 3 nosing today. 2 His works precisely reflect the spirit of the age. But architects Herzog & De Meuron? hotel complexes ( Atlanta, 1996; Times Square, 1997; San Fran - what is it that makes them what they are? And makes them so Gursky always has his eye on the world, seeking to transpose the ARCHITECTURE AS THEME AND SYMPTOM cisco, 1998; Shanghai, 2000; Avenue of the Americas, 2001), lux - different? What is it that makes them important, given the model abstraction into the reality of images: He is the peintre de la The compression of the issues and the values of civilized exis - ury business ( Prada I, 1996; Prada II, 1997; Ohne Titel V [Unti - tremendous amount of image data available in an “age of total vie moderne of the global age.
    [Show full text]
  • Graciela Iturbide's Private Universe
    Graciela Iturbide’s Private Universe September 24th, 2010 by Cassandra McGrath An ostrich stares indignantly at me, hip jutting out as though I had ditched its Thanksgiving dinner. “What are you doing in this gallery staring at me?” it seems to say. “Why didn’t you bring the cranberry sauce?” Like an exaggerated cartoon version of an image in National Geographic, the ostrich is one of the more vivid subjects in Graciela Iturbide’s most recent exhibition, Graciela Iturbide: asor, ending this week in the Rose Gallery at the Santa Monica Museum of Art. Iturbide once said, “While using my camera I am, above all, an actress participating in the scene taking place at the moment, and the other actors know what role I play.” In “asor,” taken straight from her personal archive, Iturbide creates a fantasy world that explores the terror and joy of childhood solitude. Inspired by her grandchildren and Alice in Wonderland, Iturbide photographed the Southern United States, Italy, India and Mexico, using snippets from each location but nothing identifiable from any of them. Instead, she crafted a new narrative that makes the fantastic pedestrian and the pedestrian fantastic. Clocks and abandoned buildings take on the significance of mythical creatures. In one pair of photographs, two blank eyeholes carved out of rocks peer out at the viewer, observing and saying nothing. Birds gather ominously in the sky like locusts, and in one arresting image, sunflowers are backlit and shot from below, drooping and spiky as Venus Fly Traps. Iturbide plays with perspective: A giant plaster head sits next to a parked car, disorienting any sense of scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Through July 26, 2019
    Extended through July 26, 2019 Opening reception: Tuesday, April 30, 6–8pm April 30–June 22, 2019 522 West 21st Street, New York Jeff Wall, Parent child, 2018, inkjet print, 86 5/8 × 108 1/4 inches (220 × 275 cm) © Jeff Wall April , Gagosian is pleased to announce Jeff Wall’s first exhibition with the gallery. The majority of the works included are on view for the first time. From his pioneering use in the s of backlit color transparencies—a medium then synonymous with advertising—to his intricately constructed scenes of enigmatic incidents from daily life, literature, and film, Wall has expanded the definition of the photograph, both as object and illusion. The triptych I giardini/The Gardens () was photographed in the gardens of the Villa Silvio Pellico in Moncalieri, outside of Turin, Italy. Though Wall has made several works that combine two or more images, this is the first in which the order, read from left to right, represents a passage of time. It therefore has a narrative aspect absent from any previous picture group. The three images— individually titled Appunto/Complaint, Disappunto/Denial, and Diffida/Expulsion order—trace the relations between either two or four characters through three depicted moments. A doubling effect occurs again in Pair of interiors (), a diptych showing either one or two couples in a lamplit living room, and in Summer Afternoons (), which shows what appears to be another equally introverted, younger couple in a sunny apartment. Each person appears in his or her own picture, creating uncertainty about whether the diptych depicts one or more “summer afternoons.” Landscapes are the subject of three more works.
    [Show full text]
  • ANDREAS GURSKY Education Solo Exhibitions
    ANDREAS GURSKY 1955 Born in Leipzig, Germany Lives and works in Düsseldorf Education 1981–87 Kunstakademie, Düsseldorf 1978–81 Folkwang University of the Arts, Essen, Germany Solo exhibitions 2020 Sprueth Magers, Berlin 2019 Gagosian, Tarmak 22, Gstaad Saanen Airport, Gstaad 2018 White Cube, London Hayward Gallery, London 2017 Bangkok, Gagosian Gallery, Rome 2016 Not Abstract II, Gagosian, New York Andreas Gursky: nicht abstrakt, K20, Düsseldorf 2015 Museum Frieder Burda, Baden-Baden, Germany Andreas Gursky: Landscapes, Parrish Art Museum, Water Mill, New York 2014 White Cube, London Andreas Gursky: Early Landscapes, Sprüth Magers, London The National Museum of Art, Osaka 2013 Galerie Rüdiger Schöttle (with Jeff Wall), Munich The National Art Center, Tokyo 2012 Stiftung Museum Kunstpalast, Düsseldorf Louisiana Museum of Modern Art, Humlebaek, Denmark Gagosian, Hong Kong 2011 Gagosian, New York 2010 Gagosian, Los Angeles Sprüth Magers, Berlin 2009 Werke/Works 80-08, Vancouver Art Gallery Moderna Museet, Stockholm 2008 Matthew Marks Gallery, New York National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne Werke/Works 80-08, Museum Haus Lange and Haus Esters, Krefeld, Germany Mathildenhöhe, Darmstadt, Germany Andreas Gursky’s Personal Exhibition, Cultural Foundation Ekaterina, Moscow Centre d’Arts et de Nature, Chaumont-sur-Loire, France Pinchuk Art Centre, Kiev Museum für Moderne Kunst, Frankfurt 2007 Kunstmuseum Basel Matthew Marks Gallery, New York Haus der Kunst, Munich; Istanbul Modern and Sharjah Art Museum, United Arab Emirates White Cube, London
    [Show full text]