DOCSLIB.ORG

Beyond Depression: Other Uses for Tricyclic Antidepressants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beyond Depression: Other Uses for Tricyclic Antidepressants REVIEW Joanne Schneider, DNP, RN, CNP Mary Patterson, CNP Xavier F. Jimenez, MD, MA Center for Comprehensive Pain Recovery, Center for Comprehensive Pain Recovery, Center for Comprehensive Pain Recovery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Assistant Professor, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH Beyond depression: Other uses for tricyclic antidepressants ABSTRACT ost tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) M have US Food and Drug Administration Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) were originally designed approval for treatment of depression and anxi- and marketed for treating depression, but over time they ety disorders, but they are also a viable off-label have been applied to a variety of conditions, mostly off- option that should be considered by clinicians label. TCAs can serve as first-line or augmenting drugs in specialties beyond psychiatry, especially for for neuropathic pain, headache, migraine, gastrointesti- treating pain syndromes. Given the ongoing nal syndromes, fibromyalgia, pelvic pain, insomnia, and epidemic of opioid use disorder, increasing atten- psychiatric conditions other than depression. This article tion has been drawn to alternative strategies for reviews pharmacology, dosing, and safety considerations chronic pain management, renewing an interest for these uses. in the use of TCAs. This review summarizes the pharmacologic KEY POINTS properties of TCAs, their potential indications Amitriptyline is the most useful TCA for many painful in conditions other than depression, and safety conditions. considerations. ■ BRIEF HISTORY OF TRICYCLICS TCAs can be especially helpful for patients with a pain syndrome or insomnia with comorbid depression, al- TCAs were originally designed in the 1950s and marketed later for treating depression. though their benefits appear to be independent of anti- Due to their adverse effects and lethality in depressant effects. overdose quantities, over time they have been largely replaced by selective serotonin reup- TCAs have long half-lives and so can be taken once a day. take inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepi- nephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) in de- Effective dosages for symptom control in many conditions pression management. However, TCAs have are lower than for severe depression; dosage should start been applied to conditions other than depres- low and be gradually increased while monitoring efficacy sion with varying degrees of efficacy and safety. and adverse effects. ■ TCA PHARMACOLOGY TCAs should not be used concurrently with a monoamine Named for their chemical structure, TCAs oxidase inhibitor and by certain patient groups: the el- contain 3 rings with 1 side chain. They are derly, pregnant women, and patients with certain cardiac grouped into tertiary and secondary amine 1 conduction abnormalities, epilepsy, or risk of suicide. subtypes (Table 1). TCAs are absorbed in the small intestine and undergo first-pass metabolism in the liver. They bind extensively to proteins, leading to interactions with other protein-bound drugs. doi:10.3949/ccjm.86a.19005 They are widely distributed throughout the CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 86 • NUMBER 12 DECEMBER 2019 807 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on September 26, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. TRICYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANTS TABLE 1 Dosing and adverse effects of commonly prescribed tricyclic antidepressants Adverse effectsa Reuptake Hypoten- Weight Initial/maximum mechanismb Sedation sion Seizures gain Cardiac dosing (for MDD) Tertiary amine tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) Amitriptyline 5-HT > NE +++ +++ ++ ++ +++ 25–75 mg/ 200 mg daily Clomipramine 5-HT > NE ++ ++ +++ + ++ 25 mg/ 250 mg daily Doxepin 5-HT = NE ++++ + ++ ++ + 50–75 mg/ 300 mg nightly Imipramine 5-HT = NE ++ +++ ++ ++ +++ 50–100 mg/ 200 mg daily Secondary amine TCAs Despiramine NE > 5-HT + + + + ++ 100–200 mg/ 300 mg daily Maprotiline NE > 5-HT ++ + + ++ + 25–50 mg/ 225 mg nightly Nortriptyline NE > 5-HT + + + + ++ 25–50 mg/ 150 mg daily a Plus sign indicates potential severity of adverse effects. b Tertiary amine TCAs tend to preferentially inhibit serotonin reuptake, resulting in greater synaptic serotonin levels, whereas secondary amine TCAs tend to preferentially inhibit norepinephrine reuptake, resulting in greater synaptic norepinephrine levels. MDD = major depressive disorder; NE = norepinephrine; 5-HT = serotonin systemic circulation because they are highly vision, urinary retention, drowsiness, and se- lipophilic, resulting in systemic effects includ- dation.1 ing central nervous system manifestations. Research suggests that TCAs relieve pain Peak plasma concentration is at about 2 to centrally through a descending pathway that 6 hours, and elimination half-life is around 24 inhibits transmission of pain signals in the spi- hours for most agents, providing a long dura- nal cord, as well as peripherally through com- tion of action. Clearance depends on cyto- plex anti-neuroimmune actions.2 Norepineph- chrome P450 oxidative enzymes.1 rine appears to play a more important role in ■ MECHANISMS OF ACTION this process than serotonin, although both are deemed necessary for the “dual action” often TCAs inhibit reuptake of norepinephrine and cited in pain management,1 which is also the serotonin, resulting in accumulation of these neurotransmitters in the presynaptic cleft. rationale for widespread use of SNRIs to con- They also block postsynaptic histamine, al- trol pain. pha-adrenergic, and muscarinic-acetylcholine Table 1 compares neurotransmitter reup- receptors, causing a variety of adverse effects, take mechanisms, adverse effect profiles, and including dry mouth, confusion, cognitive typical dosages for depression for commonly impairment, hypotension, orthostasis, blurred prescribed TCAs. 808 CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 86 • NUMBER 12 DECEMBER 2019 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on September 26, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. SCHNEIDER AND COLLEAGUES ■ POTENTIAL USES TCAs have been used to treat chronic low back pain for decades and have been repeatedly Headache and migraine shown to be more effective than placebo in re- TCAs have been shown to be effective for ducing pain severity.16,17 A double-blind con- managing and preventing chronic headache 18 3,4 trolled trial from 1999 compared the effects syndromes. Amitriptyline has been the most of the TCA maprotiline (up to 150 mg daily), studied of the TCAs for both chronic daily and the SSRI paroxetine (up to 30 mg daily), and episodic migraine headache, showing the most placebo and found a statistically significant efficacy among diverse drug classes (angio- reduction in back pain with maprotiline com- tensin II receptor blockers, anticonvulsants, pared with paroxetine and placebo. However, beta-blockers, SSRIs) compared with placebo. a 2008 meta-analysis suggested little evidence However, in head-to-head trials, amitriptyline that TCAs were superior to placebo.19 was no more effective than SSRIs, venlafax- 4 4 Evidence of TCA efficacy for back pain ine, topiramate, or propranolol. Jackson et al was reported in 2018 with a well-designed suggested that prophylactic medication choic- 6-month double-blind randomized controlled es should be tailored to patient characteristics trial20 comparing low-dose amitriptyline (25 and expected adverse effects, and specifically mg) with an active comparator (benztropine recommended that TCAs—particularly ami- 1 mg). The authors reported that amitripty- triptyline—be reserved for patients who have line was effective in reducing pain and pain- both migraine and depression. related disability without incurring serious ad- Neuropathic pain verse effects. They suggested continued use of Neuropathic pain is defined as pain second- TCAs for chronic low back pain if complicat- ary to a lesion or disease of the somatosensory ed with pain-related disability, insomnia, de- nervous system5 and is the pathomechanistic pression, or other comorbidity, although they component of a number of conditions, in- called for further large-scale studies. They also cluding postherpetic neuralgia,6 diabetic and cautioned that patients started the trial with nondiabetic painful polyneuropathy,7 post- symptoms similar to the adverse effects of traumatic or postsurgical neuropathic pain8 TCAs themselves; this has implications for Increasing (including plexus avulsion and complex re- monitoring of symptoms as well as TCA ad- attention 9 gional pain syndrome ), central poststroke verse effects while using these drugs. has been drawn pain,10 spinal cord injury pain,11 and multiple Fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain sclerosis-associated pain.12 to alternative Fibromyalgia is a common, frustrating, non- As a group, TCAs appear to have a role as inflammatory pain syndrome characterized strategies first-line agents for managing these varied neu- by diffuse hyperalgesia and multiple comor- ropathic pain syndromes. In a recent meta-anal- for chronic pain bidities.21 Although sleep hygiene, exercise, ysis,13 16 (89%) of 18 placebo-controlled trials management of TCAs (mainly amitriptyline at 25–150 mg/ cognitive-behavioral therapy, some gabapen- day) for these pain conditions were positive, tinoids (pregabalin), and a combination of with a combined number needed to treat of 3.6, these therapies have demonstrated efficacy, suggesting a role for TCAs in these conditions. TCAs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pregabalin Is First Drug Approved for Fibromyalgia
    50 Pain Medicine C LINICAL P SYCHIATRY N EWS • August 2007 Pregabalin Is First Drug Approved for Fibromyalgia BY ELIZABETH MECHCATIE that are not usually painful, and that pre- cording to the revised prescribing infor- The daily dose should be administered Senior Writer gabalin may reduce the degree of pain ex- mation for pregabalin. The two studies— in two divided doses per day, starting at a perienced by patients with fibromyalgia by a 14-week double-blind placebo-controlled total daily dose of 150 mg/day, which regabalin has become the first drug binding to a specific protein within study and a 6-month randomized with- may be increased to 300 mg/day, within 1 to win approval by the Food and “overexcited nerve cells.” drawal study—found that treatment was week; the maximum dose is 450 mg/day, PDrug Administration for the man- The approval “marks an important ad- associated with a reduction in pain by vi- according to the prescribing information. agement of fibromyalgia. vance, and provides a reason for optimism sual analog scale and improvements based The most common side effects in the tri- The FDA based the approval on two for the many patients on a patient global as- als were mild to moderate dizziness and double-blind, controlled trials of approxi- who will receive pain Side effects such as sessment and on the sleepiness, blurred vision, weight gain, dry mately 1,800 patients. Data from the stud- relief ” with prega- Fibromyalgia Impact mouth, and swelling of the hands and feet ies have shown that patients with fi- balin, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Intravenous Ketamine Alleviates Pain in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient with Comorbid Fibromyalgia
    Case Report J Med Cases. 2018;9(5):142-144 Intravenous Ketamine Alleviates Pain in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient With Comorbid Fibromyalgia Ashraf F. Hannaa, b, Bishoy Abrahama, Andrew Hannaa, Micheal McKennaa, Adam J. Smitha Abstract bance, and psychological distress [4]. It is commonly regarded as the “prototypical central sensitivity syndrome” [5]. While A 49-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and comorbid its etiology is not fully understood, fibromyalgia is thought to fibromyalgia presented to the clinic in extreme pain, described to be result from abnormal central pain processing and increased a 10 on an 11-point pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS). central sensitivity that results in intense, widespread pain. Fi- Because the patient also met the diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia bromyalgia is diagnosed using the 2010 American College of and conventional medications did not achieve adequate pain control Rheumatology (ACR) criteria [6]: 1) Widespread pain index for either condition, the off-label use of intravenous (IV) ketamine (WPI) ≥ 7 and symptom severity (SS) scale score ≥ 5 or WPI was presented as an alternative therapeutic option. The patient un- 3 - 6 and SS scale score ≥ 9. 2) Symptoms have been present derwent 10 consecutive IV infusion sessions with increasing doses at a similar level for at least 3 months. 3) The patient does not of ketamine hydrochloride without any complications. Following the have a disorder that would otherwise explain the pain. 10th infusion, the patient reported that her pain was virtually non- A recent epidemiological study characterized the preva- existent (PI-NRS 0 - 1). lence of fibromyalgia among patients without pain, with re- gional pain, and with widespread pain [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Ketamine for Chronic Non- Cancer Pain: a Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost- Effectiveness, And
    CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY WITH CRITICAL APPRAISAL Ketamine for Chronic Non- Cancer Pain: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost- Effectiveness, and Guidelines Service Line: Rapid Response Service Version: 1.0 Publication Date: May 28, 2020 Report Length: 28 Pages Authors: Khai Tran, Suzanne McCormack Cite As: Ketamine for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines. Ottawa: CADTH; 2020 May. (CADTH rapid response report: summary with critical appraisal) ISSN: 1922-8147 (online) Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help Canadian health care decision-makers, health care professionals, health systems leaders, and policy-makers make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. While patients and others may access this document, the document is made available for informational purposes only and no representations or warranties are made with respect to its fitness for any particular purpose. The information in this document should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice or as a substitute for the application of clinical judgment in respect of the care of a particular patient or other professional judgment in any decision-making process. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) does not endorse any information, drugs, therapies, treatments, products, processes, or services. While care has been taken to ensure that the information prepared by CADTH in this document is accurate, complete, and up-to-date as at the applicable date the material was first published by CADTH, CADTH does not make any guarantees to that effect. CADTH does not guarantee and is not responsible for the quality, currency, propriety, accuracy, or reasonableness of any statements, information, or conclusions contained in any third-party materials used in preparing this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Pubmed/19078481?Dopt=Abstract
    Efficacy of tramadol in treatment of pain in fibromyalgia. - Pu... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19078481?dopt=Abstract PubMed Format: Abstract J Clin Rheumatol. 2000 Oct;6(5):250-7. Efficacy of tramadol in treatment of pain in fibromyalgia. Russell IJ1, Kamin M, Bennett RM, Schnitzer TJ, Green JA, Katz WA. Author information Abstract An outpatient, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tramadol in the treatment of the pain of fibromyalgia syndrome. One hundred patients with fibromyalgia syndrome, (1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria), were enrolled into an open-label phase and treated with tramadol 50-400 mg/day. Patients who tolerated tramadol and perceived benefit were randomized to treatment with tramadol or placebo in the double-blind phase. The primary efficacy outcome measurement was the time (days) to exit from the double-blind phase because of inadequate pain relief, which was reported as the cumulative probability of discontinuing treatment because of inadequate pain relief. One hundred patients entered the open-label phase; 69% tolerated and achieved benefit with tramadol. These patients were then randomized to continue tramadol (n = 35) or convert to a placebo (n = 34) during a 6-week, double-blind treatment period. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of cumulative probability of discontinuing the double blind period because of inadequate pain relief was significantly lower in the tramadol group compared with the placebo group (p = 0.001). Twenty (57.1%) patients in the tramadol group successfully completed the entire double-blind phase compared with nine (27%) in the placebo group (p = .015).
    [Show full text]
  • Therapeutic Class Overview Neuropathic Pain and Fibromyalgia Agents
    Therapeutic Class Overview Neuropathic Pain and Fibromyalgia Agents INTRODUCTION • Neuropathic pain is commonly described by patients as burning or electrical in nature and results from injury or damage to the nervous system (Herndon et al 2017). Management of neuropathic pain may prove challenging due to unpredictable patient response to drug therapy (Attal et al 2010). • Fibromyalgia is characterized by chronic musculoskeletal pain with unknown etiology and pathophysiology. Patients typically complain of widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, cognitive disturbance, psychiatric symptoms, and multiple somatic symptoms (Goldenberg 2019). Fibromyalgia is often difficult to treat and requires a multidisciplinary, individualized treatment program (Goldenberg 2018). • This review focuses on medications that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain, and/or post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). The products in this review include Cymbalta (duloxetine), Gralise (gabapentin ER), Horizant (gabapentin enacarbil ER), Lidoderm (lidocaine 5% patch), Lyrica (pregabalin), Lyrica CR (pregabalin ER), Neurontin (gabapentin), Nucynta ER (tapentadol ER), Qutenza (capsaicin), Savella (milnacipran), and ZTlido (lidocaine 1.8% topical system). These agents represent a variety of pharmacologic classes, including anticonvulsants, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), extended-release (ER) opioids, and topical analgesics. As such, these agents hold additional FDA-approved indications
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Medical Policy Nerve Fiber Density Testing AHS – M2112 “Notification”
    Corporate Medical Policy Nerve Fiber Density Testing AHS – M2112 “Notification” File Name: nerve_fiber_density_testing Origination: 01/01/2019 Last CAP Review: n/a Next CAP Review: 01/01/2020 Last Review: 01/01/2019 Policy Effective April 1, 2019 Description of Procedure or Service Nerve fiber density testing involves analysis of skin biopsy stained with an antibody to antiprotein gene product 9.5 (Wilkinson et al., 1989) which avidly stains all axons (Dalsgaard, Rydh, & Haegerstrand, 1989). The number and morphology of axons within the epidermis are evaluated to determine epidermal nerve fiber density (McCarthy et al., 1995) and assess for the presence and degree of neuropathy (A. G. Smith & Gibson, 2018). ***Note: This Medical Policy is complex and technical. For questions concerning the technical language and/or specific clinical indications for its use, please consult your physician. Policy BCBSNC will provide coverage for nerve fiber density testing when it is determined to be medically necessary because the medical criteria and guidelines shown below are met. Benefits Application This medical policy relates only to the services or supplies described herein. Please refer to the Member's Benefit Booklet for availability of benefits. Member's benefits may vary according to benefit design; therefore member benefit language should be reviewed before applying the terms of this medical policy. When nerve fiber density testing is covered Skin biopsy with epidermal nerve fiber density measurement for the diagnosis of small-fiber neuropathy
    [Show full text]
  • Fibromyalgia
    Fibromyalgia SANGITA CHAKRABARTY, MD, MSPH, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee ROGER ZOOROB, MD, MPH, Meharry Medical College and Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee Fibromyalgia is an idiopathic, chronic, nonarticular pain syndrome with generalized tender points. It is a multisystem disease characterized by sleep disturbance, fatigue, headache, morning stiffness, paresthesias, and anxiety. Nearly 2 percent of the general population in the United States suffers from fibromyalgia, with females of middle age being at increased risk. The diagnosis is primarily based on the presence of widespread pain for a period of at least three months and the presence of 11 tender points among 18 specific anatomic sites. There are certain comorbid con- ditions that overlap with, and also may be confused with, fibromyalgia. Recently there has been improved recognition and understanding of fibromyalgia. Although there are no guidelines for treatment, there is evidence that a multidimensional approach with patient education, cognitive behavior therapy, exercise, physical therapy, and pharmacologic therapy can be effective. (Am Fam Physician 2007;76:247-54. Copyright © 2007 American Academy of Family Physicians.) This article exemplifies ibromyalgia is an idiopathic, chronic, gesting the contribution of both genetic and the AAFP 2007 Annual nonarticular pain syndrome defined environmental factors.4 Clinical Focus on manage- ment of chronic illness. by widespread musculoskeletal Demographic and social characteristics ▲ pain and generalized tender points associated with the presence of fibromyalgia See editorial on F(Table 1). Other common symptoms include are female sex, being divorced, failing to com- page 290. ▲ sleep disturbances, fatigue, headache, morning plete high school, and low income. Psycho- Patient information: Handouts on fibromyalgia stiffness, paresthesias, and anxiety.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Rheumatology Volume 75, No. Is Fibromyalgia a Neuropathic Pain Syndrome?
    The Journal of Rheumatology Volume 75, no. Is fibromyalgia a neuropathic pain syndrome? Michael C Rowbotham J Rheumatol 2005;75;38-40 http://www.jrheum.org/content/75/38 1. Sign up for TOCs and other alerts http://www.jrheum.org/alerts 2. Information on Subscriptions http://jrheum.com/faq 3. Information on permissions/orders of reprints http://jrheum.com/reprints_permissions The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Earl D. Silverman featuring research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields. Downloaded from www.jrheum.org on September 24, 2021 - Published by The Journal of Rheumatology Is Fibromyalgia a Neuropathic Pain Syndrome? MICHAEL C. ROWBOTHAM ABSTRACT. The fibromyalgia syndrome (FM) seems an unlikely candidate for classification as a neuropathic pain. The disorder is diagnosed based on a compatible history and the presence of multiple areas of musculoskeletal tenderness. A consistent pathology in either the peripheral or central nervous system (CNS) has not been demonstrated in patients with FM, and they are not at higher risk for diseases of the CNS such as multiple sclerosis or of the peripheral nervous system such as peripheral neuropathy. A large proportion of FM suf- ferers have accompanying symptoms and signs of uncertain etiology, such as chronic fatigue, sleep distur- bance, and bowel/bladder irritability. With the exception of migraine headaches and possibly irritable bowel syndrome, the accompanying disorders are clearly not neurological in origin. The impetus to classify the FM as a neuropathic pain comes from multiple lines of research suggesting widespread pain and tenderness are associated with chronic sensitization of the CNS.
    [Show full text]
  • Fibromyalgia
    The Voice of the Patient A series of reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) Patient-Focused Drug Development Initiative Fibromyalgia Public Meeting: March 26, 2014 Report Date: October 2014 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................3 Meeting overview ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Report overview and key themes ............................................................................................................. 4 Topic 1: Disease Symptoms and Daily Impacts That Matter Most to Patients .......................................5 Perspectives on most significant symptoms ............................................................................................. 6 Overall impact of fibromyalgia on daily life .............................................................................................. 8 Topic 2: Patient Perspectives on Treatments for Fibromyalgia .............................................................9 Prescriptions and over-the-counter drugs ................................................................................................ 9 Non-drug therapies ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Amitriptyline Information Booklet
    Drug information Amitriptyline AMITRIPTYLINE is used to relieve pain in several long-term conditions including arthritis, back pain and fibromyalgia Amitriptyline information booklet Introduction • arthritis (arth-rye-tus) • back pain Amitriptyline (a-muh-trip-tuh-leen) is a drug that can reduce your • fibromyalgia (fie-bruh-my-al-juh) pain and discomfort, and help you get a good night’s sleep. • tension headaches and migraines You can discuss the benefits and risks of taking amitriptyline with • damage to nerve endings in limbs, which may be described to healthcare professionals before you start treatment, so you’re able you as peripheral neuropathy (pe-rif-er-ul new-ro-pa-thee). to make an informed decision. You may not be able to take amitriptyline if: What is amitriptyline and how is it used? • you’ve had an allergic reaction to a medication in the past • you have heart problems, as it can make them worse Amitriptyline is a type of drug called a tricyclic antidepressant. • you have uncontrolled bipolar disorder These drugs were originally developed to treat anxiety and depression, but when taken at a low dose they can reduce or • you have the rare inherent blood disorder porphyria stop pain. (por-fear-ee-ya) which affects the nervous system • you have liver or kidney problems Amitriptyline works by increasing the amount of serotonin your • you have epilepsy, as it can increase the risk of seizures brain makes. Serotonin is a chemical, called a neurotransmitter, that • you’ve had or are having treatment for depression, as some the brain sends out to nerves in the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Milnacipran, a Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor: a Novel Treatment for Fibromyalgia
    Drug Evaluation Milnacipran, a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor: a novel treatment for fibromyalgia Milnacipran hydrochloride is a serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitor that was recently approved by the US FDA for the treatment of fibromyalgia (FM). Evidence has accumulated suggesting that, in animal models, milnacipran may exert pain-mitigating influences involving norepinephrine- and serotonin-related processes at supraspinal, spinal and peripheral levels in pain transmission. Milnacipran has demonstrated efficacy for the reduction of pain as well as improvements in global assessments of well-being and functional capacity among treated FM patients. Its role in addressing comorbidities associated with FM, including visceral pain and migraine, has, as yet, to be investigated. Milnacipran may be of special interest for use in patients for whom hepatic dysfunction precludes the use of other agents, for example, duloxetine. It has a negligible influence on cytochrome metabolism, and therefore may be of particular benefit in patients requiring multiple concurrently prescribed medications. Milnacipran may comprise a reasonable option in the armamentarium of treatments available to manage FM. KEYWORDS: antidepressants n chronic pain n fibromyalgian milnacipran n serotonin Raphael J Leo and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Fibromyalgia (FM) is a syndrome characterized Several pharmacological approaches have Biomedical Sciences, by chronic, widespread musculoskeletal pain and been advocated for the treatment of FM. State University of New York at tenderness. The prevalence of FM in the general Because of their impact on these presump- Buffalo, Erie County Medical population is estimated to be 2–4%; it tends to tive pathophysiologic processes, antidepres- Center, 462 Grider Street, show a female predilection, and increases with sants have frequently been advocated for Buffalo, NY 14215, USA age [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • Acute and Chronic Pain Management in Fibromyalgia: Updates on Pharmacotherapy
    American Journal of Therapeutics 18, 487–509 (2011) Acute and Chronic Pain Management in Fibromyalgia: Updates on Pharmacotherapy Eric S. Hsu, MD* Fibromyalgia (FM) is a mysterious pain syndrome with progressive and widespread pain, explicit areas of tender points, stiffness, sleep disturbance, fatigue, and psychological distress without any obvious disease. FM is commonly perceived as a condition of central pain and sensory aug- mentation. There are documented functional abnormalities in pain and sensory processing in FM. Central sensitization and lack of descending analgesic activity are the 2 leading mechanisms that have been demonstrated by advance in both basic and clinical research. The pathogenesis of FM may also be attributed to the genetic polymorphisms involving serotoninergic, dopaminergic, and catecholaminergic systems. Any psychiatric disorders and psychosocial influences in FM may also affect the severity of pain. The various external stimuli or trigger such as infection, trauma, and stress may all contribute to proceed to presentation of FM. The recent launches of 3 US Food and Drug Administration–approved pharmacotherapy for FM namely pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran have certainly raised the profile of optimal chronic pain management. However, appropriate eval- uation and efficacious management of acute pain has not been as well publicized as chronic pain in FM. Acute pain or flare up caused by any trauma or surgery certainly may present a real challenge for patients with FM and their health care providers. Pre-emptive analgesia and pro-active treatment may offer the momentum for acute pain control based on model of central sensitization and pain in FM. This review article on FM appraises the modern practice of multimodal therapy focus on both acute and chronic pain management.
    [Show full text]