CWP No.1640 of 2008 (O&M) (1) in the HIGH COURT of PUNJAB and HARYANA at CHANDIGARH Date of Decision
CWP No.1640 of 2008 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 06.11.2012 CWP No.1640 of 2008 Kartar Singh …..Petitioner Vs. Union of India & others …..Respondents CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present: - Mr. Satbir Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Ranjana Shahi, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. N.R. Dahiya, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. Raghubir Tejpal, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mrs. Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana, and Mr. Kshitij Sharma, AAG, Haryana, for respondent Nos.4,5,6,7 and 8. Mr. Ashwani K. Mata, Senior Advocate, with M/s Deepak Kanwar, Sudhir Kumar and Razeev Prasad Dubey, Advocates, for respondent No.10. Mr. S.K. Monga, Advocate, for respondent No.13. Ms. Anu Chatrath, Advocate, for respondent No.14. Mr. Ravi Kamal Gupta, Advocate, for the applicants. 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? CWP No.1640 of 2008 (O&M) (2) HEMANT GUPTA, J. We are called upon to examine in this bunch of petitions, the inter-relation; contradictions, if any, and the role of the authorities under the three Central Statutes i.e. University Grants Commission Act, 1956; Indira Gandhi National Open University Act, 1985 and All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987, particularly in respect of technical/professional courses through the Distance Education Mode by (i) Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation, Salem, Tamil Nadu; (ii) IASE Gandhi Vidya Mandir, Sardar Shahar, Rajasthan; (iii) JRN Vidyapeeth, Udaipur, Rajasthan; and (iv) Allahabad Agriculture Research Institute, Allahabad, U.P.
[Show full text]