Basic Life Support Checklist
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Multi-County Ambulance Inspection Basic Life Support Checklist
Multi-County Ambulance Inspection Basic Life Support Checklist Company Name: ___________________________________________ Date: _____________________ Sticker Number: __________ Old Sticker Number: _________ Based in the following counties: Adams Arapahoe Broomfield Douglas Elbert Jefferson Unit No.: _______ VIN: __________________________________________Lic #: ___________________ Exp. Date: _________ Ambulance Make: _____________________ Manufacturer: ________________________ Year: ________ Odometer: _________ Insurance Company: ______________________________ Policy No.: _____________________________ Exp. Date: _________ __Basic Life Support __Basic Life Support with Advanced Life Support Capabilities __Advanced Life Support (BLS) (BLS/ALS) (ALS) __ Reserve Vehicle (Will be fully stocked according to this Inspection list before going into service.) Basic Life Support Check List Emergency Systems: __ AED-Automatic External Defibrillator Serial No ________ __ Ambulance Service Medical Treatment __Adult Pads __Pediatric Pads Protocols (Current) __Computerized __Printed Passed Self-Test Date: _____________ Time:___________ __ Running Lights __ Emergency Lights __Siren __Opticom Dressings and Bandages: __Wipers __ ABD Pads __ Communications appropriate for jurisdiction served. __ Bandages, roller type, self-adhesive __cell phone __ Portable Radio __ Multi Trauma Dressing (10 x 36) __ Dispatched by: _________________________ __ Sterile Burn Sheets __ A set of 3 warning reflectors or devices. __ Occlusive Dressing ______________________________________ -
NIMS 508 Stillwater Flood Search and Rescue Team
Resource Typing Definition for Response Mass Search and Rescue Operations STILLWATER/FLOOD SEARCH AND RESCUE TEAM DESCRIPTION The Stillwater/Flood Search and Rescue (SAR) Team conducts search, rescue, and recovery operations for humans and animals in stillwater and stillwater/flood environments RESOURCE CATEGORY Search and Rescue RESOURCE KIND Team OVERALL FUNCTION The Stillwater/Flood SAR team: 1. Searches for and rescues individuals who may be injured or otherwise in need of medical attention 2. Provides emergency medical care, including Basic Life Support (BLS) 3. Provides animal rescue 4. Transports humans and animals to the nearest location for secondary land or air transport 5. Provides shore-based and boat-based water rescue for humans and animals 6. Supports helicopter rescue operations and urban SAR in water environments for humans and animals 7. Operates in environments with or without infrastructure, including environments with disrupted access to roadways, utilities, transportation, and medical facilities, and with limited access to shelter, food, and water COMPOSITION AND ORDERING 1. Requestor and provider address certain needs and issues prior to deployment, including: SPECIFICATIONS a. Communications equipment that enables more than intra-team communications, such as programmable interoperable communications equipment with capabilities for command, logistics, military, air, and so on b. Type of incident and operational environment, such as weather event, levy or dam breach, or risk of hazardous materials (HAZMAT) contamination c. Additional specialized personnel, such as advanced medical staff, animal SAR specialists, logistics specialists, advisors, helicopter support staff, or support personnel for unique operating environments d. Additional transportation-related needs, including specific vehicles, boats, trailers, drivers, mechanics, equipment, supplies, fuel, and so on e. -
Lights and Siren Use by Emergency Medical Services (EMS): Above All Do No Harm
U. S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Office of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Lights and Siren Use by Emergency Medical Services (EMS): Above All Do No Harm Author: Douglas F. Kupas, MD, EMT-P, FAEMS, FACEP Submitted by Maryn Consulting, Inc. For NHTSA Contract DTNH22-14-F-00579 About the Author Dr. Douglas Kupas is an EMS physician and emergency physician, practicing at a tertiary care medical center that is a Level I adult trauma center and Level II pediatric trauma center. He has been an EMS provider for over 35 years, providing medical care as a paramedic with both volunteer and paid third service EMS agencies. His career academic interests include EMS patient and provider safety, emergency airway management, and cardiac arrest care. He is active with the National Association of EMS Physicians (former chair of Rural EMS, Standards and Practice, and Mobile Integrated Healthcare committees) and with the National Association of State EMS Officials (former chair of the Medical Directors Council). He is a professor of emergency medicine and is the Commonwealth EMS Medical Director for the Pennsylvania Department of Health. Disclosures The author has no financial conflict of interest with any company or organization related to the topics within this report. The author serves as an unpaid member of the Institutional Research Review Committee of the International Academy of Emergency Dispatch, Salt Lake City, UT. The author is employed as an emergency physician and EMS physician by Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA. The author is employed part-time as the Commonwealth EMS Medical Director by the Pennsylvania Department of Health, Bureau of EMS, Harrisburg, PA. -
Basic Life Support Health Care Provider
ELLIS & ASSOCIATES Health Care Provider Basic Life Support MEETS CURRENT CPR & ECC GUIDELINES Ellis & Associates / Safety & Health HEALTH CARE PROVIDER BASIC LIFE SUPPORT - I Ellis & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 2160, Windermere, FL 34786-2160 www.jellis.com Copyright © 2016 by Ellis & Associates, LLC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to the publisher, addressed “Attention: Permissions Coordinator,” at the address below. Ellis & Associates P.O. Box 2160, Windermere, FL 34786-2160 Ordering Information: Quantity sales. Special discounts are available on quantity purchases by corporations, associations, trade bookstores and wholesalers. For details, contact the publisher at the address above. Disclaimer: The procedures and protocols presented in this manual and the course are based on the most current recommendations of responsible medical sources, including the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) 2015 Guidelines for CPR & ECC. Ellis & Associates, however, make no guarantee as to, and assume no responsibility for, the correctness, sufficiency, or completeness of such recommendations or information. Additional procedures may be required under particular circumstances. Ellis & Associates disclaims all liability for damages of any kind arising from the use of, reference to, reliance on, or performance based on such information. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Not Available at Time of Printing ISBN 978-0-9961108-0-8 Unless otherwise indicated on the Credits Page, all photographs and illustrations are copyright protected by Ellis & Associates. -
Spinal Motion Restriction Feasibility Study (SMRFS)
CONFIDENTIAL: Spinal Motion Restriction Feasibility Study (SMRFS). Spinal Motion Restriction Feasibility Study SMRF Study Protocol Version 1.1 IRAS ID: 253128 SMRF Study protocol v 1.1 24/01/20 Page 1 of 57 CONFIDENTIAL: Spinal Motion Restriction Feasibility Study (SMRFS). CONTACT NAMES AND NUMBERS Sponsor: Michelle Jackson, Research and Development Manager, North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Bernicia House, Goldcrest Way, Newburn Riverside, Newcastle Upon Tyne. NE15 8NY Tel: 01914302000 Email: [email protected] Chief Investigators: Lee Thompson, Trauma Team, North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Bernicia House, Goldcrest Way, Newburn Riverside, Newcastle Upon Tyne. NE15 8NY Tel: 01914302399 Email: [email protected] Investigators Group: Dr. Charlotte Bates, Northumbria Specialist Emergency Care Hospital, Email: [email protected] Dr. Christopher Hawkins. Sunderland Royal Hospital. Email: [email protected] Lt Col. Paul Hunt, James Cook University Hospital Email: [email protected] Gary Shaw, North East Ambulance Service. Email: [email protected] Study Steering/Monitoring: Dr Alasdair Corfield. NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. Dr Peter McMeekin. Northumbria University. Michelle Jackson. North East Ambulance Service Research and Development. Lee Thompson. North East Ambulance Service. Gary Shaw. North East Ambulance Service. Dr. Charlotte Bates. Northumbria Specialist Emergency Care Hospital. Shane Woodhouse. North East Ambulance Service Clinical Audit. Gary Shaw. North East Ambulance Service. Dan Haworth. North East Ambulance Service. Study Co-ordination Centre: North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Bernicia House, Goldcrest Way, Newburn Riverside, Newcastle Upon Tyne. NE15 8NY IRAS ID: 253128 SMRF Study protocol v 1.1 24/01/20 Page 2 of 57 CONFIDENTIAL: Spinal Motion Restriction Feasibility Study (SMRFS). -
Initial Capnography Values and Resuscitation Outcomes of Patients Assisted by Basic Life Support Units in First Instance
Submitted: 09 December, 2020 Accepted: 05 February, 2021 Published: 08 July, 2021 DOI:10.22514/sv.2021.099 ORIGINALRESEARCH Initial capnography values and resuscitation outcomes of patients assisted by basic life support units in first instance; descriptive prospective study Francisco José Cereceda-Sánchez1;*, Jaume Ponce-Taylor1, Pedro Montero-París1, Iñaki Unzaga-Ercilla1, Natalia Martinez-Cuellar1, Jesús Molina-Mula2 1SAMU 061 Baleares, C/Illes Balears sn. Abstract Palma de Mallorca, 07014, Spain Introduction: Understanding the key factors which affect out hospital cardiac arrest 2Phd Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy University of Balearic (OHCA) outcomes is essential in order to promote patient treatment. The main Islands, Ctra. De Valldemossa, km 7,5 objective of this research was to describe the correlations between the capnographic Palma de Mallorca (Islas Baleares), values obtained during the first minute of monitoring on cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 07122, Spain assisted by basic life-support units, with the results as return of spontaneous circulation *Correspondence (ROSC) and alive hospital admission. The secondary objectives were to describe the [email protected] sociodemographic characteristics of the patients assisted, and to analyze any correlations (Francisco José Cereceda-Sánchez) between receiving basic life-support units and/or defibrillation prior to the arrival of basic life-support units, and the results of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation maneuvers. Methods: A prospective, descriptive, observational study of adult non-traumatic out hospital cardiac arrest patients was conducted. The patients were initially assisted by basic life-support units on the island of Mallorca, with one minute of initial capnography monitoring. Results: From July 2018 to March 2020, fifty-nine patients meeting the inclusion criteria were assisted, 76% were men and their mean age was 64.45 (15.07) years old. -
NYS CFR Protocols
New York State Department of Health Bureau of Emergency Medical Services Statewide Basic Life Support Adult & Pediatric Treatment Protocols Certified First Responder 2003 = Preface and Acknowledgments The 2003 New York State (NYS) Statewide Basic Life Support Adult & Pediatric Treatment Protocols for the Certified First Responder (CFR) includes revisions to match the current New York State CFR course curricula. These 2003 statewide protocols also include de- emphasizing the use of CUPS. CUPS is no longer required to be taught in NYS Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Courses and is not tested in Practical Skills Examinations or State Written Certification Examinations. We would like to acknowledge the members of the New York State EMS Council’s Medical Standards Committee for the time and effort given to developing this set of protocols. In addition, we would like to recognize the efforts of the Regional Emergency Medical Advisory Committees (REMACS) for their input and review. Mark Henry, MD, FACEP Medical Director Edward Wronski, Director State Emergency Medical Advisory Committee Bureau of Emergency Medical Services NYS CFR Basic Life Support Protocols NYS CFR Basic Life Support Protocols Introduction The 2003 NYS Statewide Basic Life Support Adult and Pediatric Treatment Protocols designed by the Bureau of Emergency Medical Services of the New York State Department of Health and the New York State Emergency Medical Services Council. These protocols have been reviewed and approved by the New York State Emergency Medical Advisory Committee (SEMAC) and the New York State Emergency Medical Services Council (SEMSCO). The protocols reflect the current minimally acceptable statewide treatment standards for adult and pediatric basic life support (BLS) used by the Certified First Responder (CFR). -
Required ALS and BLS Equipment and Supplies
S T A T E O F H A W A I I D E P A R T M E N T O F H E A L T H ESSENTIAL EQUIPMENT and SUPPLIES FOR BASIC and ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT Ambulance Service Standards Revised 10-14-10 ESSENTIAL EQUIPMENT FOR BASIC LIFE SUPPORT Ambulance cot w/ 3 seatbelts Sheets, linen or disp., 4 ea Cot fasteners, Floor/Wall Mount Blankets, non-synthetic, 4 ea Portable oxygen unit 360L min. tank Gauze pads, sterile, 3x3 min, 24 ea Flowmeter 0-15L/min Gauze rolls, sterile, 2" x 5 yds, 4 ea Positive pressure elder-type valve Gauze rolls, sterile 3"/4" x 5 yds, 4 ea Oxygen masks, clear, disposable, adult/pedi 1 ea Gauze rolls, sterile, 6" x 5 yds, 4 ea Oxygen nasal cannula, disposable 2 ea Triangle bandage, 40" min, 3 ea Oropharyngeal airways, adult/ped/infant 1 ea Universal dressing, 8 x 10 min, sterile, 1 ea Nasopharyngeal airways, 2 ea Tape, 1" and 2" x 5 yds, 1 ea Oxygen tanks, spare, 360L min, 2 ea Bandaids, assorted Bag-valve-mask, pedi w/02 reservoir Plastic wrap, 12" x' 12" min, 1 ea Bag-valve-mask, adult w/02 reservoir Burn sheets, sterile, 2 ea Suction, portable, battery operated Sphygmomanometer, adult, 1 ea Widebore tubing Extra large adult, 1 ea Rigid pharyngeal suction tip Pediatric, 1 ea Suction catheters 5, 10, 14, 18fr, 1 ea Stethescope, 1 ea Bite sticks (mouth gag), 2 ea Scissors, bandage, 5" min Ammonia inhalants, 3 ea Thermometer, oral and rectal, 1 ea Antiseptic swabs, 50 ea Spineboard, short, w/straps, 1 ea Bulb syringe, 3 oz. -
Guide for Developing an EMS Agency Safety Program
National EMS SAFETY COUNCIL Guide for Developing an EMS Agency Safety Program A roadmap for EMS agencies to develop and implement a comprehensive workplace safety program, customizable to their agency type, size and needs. Introduction to the EMS Safety Program Guide National EMS Safety In 2013, the National EMS Culture of Safety Strategy was published. Funded by Council Mission the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the initiative brought Statement together the EMS stakeholder community to identify what constitutes a safe environment for EMS patients and practitioners; barriers to achieving a safe EMS • Develop practical environment; and a strategy to overcome these challenges. ways to implement the recommendations The strategy envisioned the establishment of a national level organization to included in National coordinate national EMS safety efforts and serve as a repository for information, EMS Culture of Safety data and resources. In 2015, leading national EMS and safety organizations came Strategy. together to form the National EMS Safety Council. The goals of the council are to: • Review the latest information, research • Ensure that patients receive emergency and mobile healthcare with the highest and best practices standards of safety. on EMS patient and • Promote a safe and healthy work environment for all emergency and mobile practitioner safety. healthcare practitioners. • Develop and publish consensus statements This Guide for Developing an EMS Agency Safety Program is an initiative of the on the issues of EMS National EMS Safety Council. Its members saw the need to provide tools and patient and practitioner resources that EMS agencies could use to put the concepts outlined in the Culture safety. -
Basic Life Support Patient Care Standards
This document contains both information and navigation buttons. To read information, use the Down Arrow from a form field. Basic Life Support Patient Care Standards Version 3.0.1 Comes into force December 11, 2017 Emergency Health Services Branch Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care To all users of this publication: The information contained in the Standards has been carefully compiled and is believed to be accurate at date of publication. For further information on the Basic Life Support Patient Care Standards, please contact: Emergency Health Services Branch Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care 5700 Yonge Street, 6th Floor Toronto, ON M2M 4K5 416-327-7900 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2016 Document Control Version Date of Issue Comes into Force Brief Description of Change Number Date 3.0 July 2016 N/A (amended prior Full update. See accompanying training to in force date) bulletin for further details 3.0.1 November 2016 December 11, 2017 Update to Paramedic Prompt Card for Acute Stroke Protocol: Contraindication changed from “CTAS Level 2” to “CTAS Level 1”. Table of Contents Preamble ............................................................................................................................. 7 Preface............................................................................................................................................. 1 Definitions....................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... -
Accepted Manuscript
Accepted Manuscript The definite risks and questionable benefits of liberal pre-hospital spinal immobilisation Thomas Adam Purvis, Brian Carlin, Peter Driscoll PII: S0735-6757(17)30063-3 DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.045 Reference: YAJEM 56444 To appear in: Received date: 14 October 2016 Revised date: 3 January 2017 Accepted date: 23 January 2017 Please cite this article as: Thomas Adam Purvis, Brian Carlin, Peter Driscoll , The definite risks and questionable benefits of liberal pre-hospital spinal immobilisation. The address for the corresponding author was captured as affiliation for all authors. Please check if appropriate. Yajem(2017), doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.045 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT MANUSCRIPT TITLE PAGE TITLE: The Definite Risks and Questionable Benefits of Liberal Pre-Hospital Spinal Immobilization. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR DETAILS Full name: Mr Thomas Adam Purvis Postal address: 23 Lyndhurst Gardens, Belfast, BT13 3PH email: [email protected] Telephone number: +447887563863 CO-AUTHOR DETAILS Full name: Mr Brian Carlin Department: Pre-hospital Care Institution: Royal -
Need to Create a Head and Spinal Immobilzation Procedure
Michigan General Procedures SPINAL PRECAUTIONS Date: July 18, 2014 Page 1 of 3 Spinal Precautions Pre-Medical Control MFR/EMT/SPECIALIST/PARAMEDIC Indications & General Guidance 1. Refer to the Spinal Injury Assessment Protocol. Patients with a positive spinal injury assessment should have spinal precautions maintained during transport. 2. Major trauma patients who require extrication should have spinal precautions maintained using an extrication device (long backboard or equivalent) during extrication. If sufficient personnel are present, the patient may be log rolled from the extrication device to the ambulance cot during loading of the patient. 3. Patients may remain on the extrication device if the crew deems it safer for the patient considering stability, time and patient comfort considerations. This decision will be at the discretion of the crew. 4. Patients with penetrating traumatic injuries do not require spinal precautions unless a focal neurologic deficit is noted on the spinal injury assessment. 5. An ambulatory patient with a positive spinal injury assessment should have an appropriately sized cervical collar placed. Place the patient directly on the ambulance cot in a position of comfort, limiting movement of the spine during the process. 6. Patients, who are stable, alert and without neurological deficits may be allowed to self-extricate to the ambulance cot after placement of a cervical collar. Limit movement of the spine during the process. 7. Patients over the age of 65 with a mechanism of injury with the potential for causing cervical spine injury will have a cervical collar applied even if the spinal injury clinical assessment is negative. Specific Techniques 1.