SDHA Mutations in Adult and Pediatric Wild-Type Gastrointestinal Stromal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SDHA Mutations in Adult and Pediatric Wild-Type Gastrointestinal Stromal Modern Pathology (2013) 26, 456–463 456 & 2013 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0893-3952/13 $32.00 SDHA mutations in adult and pediatric wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors Lindsey Oudijk1,5 , Jose´ Gaal1,5, Esther Korpershoek1,5, Francien H van Nederveen1, Lorna Kelly2, Gaia Schiavon3, Jaap Verweij3, Ron HJ Mathijssen3, Michael A den Bakker1, Rogier A Oldenburg4, Rosa LE van Loon4, Maureen J O’Sullivan2, Ronald R de Krijger1 and Winand NM Dinjens1 1Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Pathology, Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; 3Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands and 4Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) harbor oncogenic mutations in KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor-a. However, a small subset of GISTs lacks such mutations and is termed ‘wild-type GISTs’. Germline mutation in any of the subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) predisposes individuals to hereditary paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas. However, germline mutations of the genes encoding SDH subunits A, B, C or D (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC or SDHD; collectively SDHx) are also identified in GISTs. SDHA and SDHB immunohistochemistry are reliable techniques to identify pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas with mutations in SDHA, SDHB, SDHC and SDHD. In this study, we investigated if SDHA immunohistochemistry could also identify SDHA-mutated GISTs. Twenty-four adult wild-type GISTs and nine pediatric/adolescent wild-type GISTs were analyzed with SDHB, and where this was negative, then with SDHA immunohistochemistry. If SDHA immunohistochemistry was negative, sequencing analysis of the entire SDHA coding sequence was performed. All nine pediatric/adolescent GISTs and seven adult wild-type GISTs were negative for SDHB immunohis- tochemistry. One pediatric GIST and three SDHB-immunonegative adult wild-type GISTs were negative for SDHA immunohistochemistry. In all four SDHA-negative GISTs, a germline SDHA c.91C4T transition was found leading to a nonsense p.Arg31X mutation. Our results demonstrate that SDHA immunohistochemistry on GISTs can identify the presence of an SDHA germline mutation. Identifying GISTs with deficient SDH activity warrants additional genetic testing, evaluation and follow-up for inherited disorders and paragangliomas. Modern Pathology (2013) 26, 456–463; doi:10.1038/modpathol.2012.186; published online 23 November 2012 Keywords: gastrointestinal stromal tumor; immunohistochemistry; succinate dehydrogenase Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most and in the small intestine (30%), other tumor sites common mesenchymal tumor of the digestive tract, include the esophagus, large bowel and rectum but accounts for o1% of all gastrointestinal neo- (10%).1,2,4 plasms.1–4 GISTs are derived from the interstitial Most GISTs (75–80%) harbor oncogenic mutations cells of Cajal and up to 95% of these tumors express in KIT (receptor for stem cell factor) and an CD117 (KIT).1,4–6 Approximately one-third to half of additional 7% in platelet-derived growth factor KIT-negative GISTs stain for DOG-1.3,7,8 The receptor-a (PDGFRA).2,5,6,9–11 These GISTs respond majority of GISTs arise in the stomach (50–60%) to targeted imatinib mesylate therapy, which inhibits tyrosine kinase activity.12,13 A small subset (10%) of GISTs lacking KIT or PDGFRA mutations 9 Correspondence: L Oudijk, BSc, Department of Pathology, are defined as wild-type GISTs. In pediatric Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Josephine patients, 85% of GISTs are KIT/PDGFRA wild-type. Nefkens Institute, room Be201, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, These occur mainly in girls, and usually have a The Netherlands. clinically indolent course.4,9,14,15 Unfortunately, E-mail: [email protected] 16 5These authors contributed equally to this work. wild-type GISTs respond poorly to imatinib. The Received 30 May 2012; revised 6 September 2012; accepted 14 pathogenetic mechanism in wild-type GISTs is still September 2012; published online 23 November 2012 not clearly understood. www.modernpathology.org SDHA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors L Oudijk et al 457 Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), an enzyme that control (granular staining in endothelial cells) was is involved in the fundamental processes of energy positive. production, participates in both the citric acid cycle If a tumor was scored negative with SDHB and the electron transport chain.17 SDH functions immunohistochemistry, but stained positive with not only in mitochondrial energy generation, but the SDHA, the entire SDHB, SDHC and SDHD coding genes encoding this enzyme also act as tumor sequences, including intron-exon boundaries, were suppressors. SDH consists of the subunits SDHA, analyzed for mutations. If SDHA immunohistoche- SDHB, SDHC and SDHD. Germline mutation in any mistry was negative, sequencing analysis of SDHA subunit predisposes individuals to hereditary para- (NM_004168) was performed. The entire SDHA gangliomas and pheochromocytomas.18 In addition, coding sequence, including intron–exon bound- mutations in these genes can also cause GISTs.9,10,19 aries, was analyzed for mutations, taking into The familial dyad of paraganglioma and GIST is also account the SDHA pseudogenes (NCBI: known as Carney–Stratakis syndrome.10,15 Carney NR_003263, NR_003264, NR_003265). DNA was triad describes the association of paragangliomas isolated according to manufacturer’s instructions with GISTs and pulmonary chondromas.15 GISTs (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, MN or AllPrep DNA/ arising in the setting of Carney triad or Carney– RNA Mini Kit, Qiagen). Stratakis syndrome are also ‘wild-type GISTs’.15 When a mutation was found in tumor DNA, the In previous reports, we showed that negative presence of the mutation was also investigated in SDHA and SDHB immunohistochemistry reliably corresponding germline DNA isolated from paraffin- identifies pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas embedded healthy tissue surrounding the tumor. caused by germline mutations in SDHA, SDHB, Sequence analysis is a semiquantitative procedure SDHC and SDHD.20,21 In addition, Carney–Stratakis and supplies some information on the relative and Carney triad associated and wild-type pediatric amount of the mutated—versus the non-mutated— GISTs can be recognized by SDHB immunohisto- SDHA allele. To substantiate the relative presence of chemistry.17,22 the mutated—and non-mutated—SDHA allele, loss In this work, we performed SDHA immunohisto- of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis was performed in chemistry on 33 wild-type GISTs, including nine SDHA-mutated tumors for a polymorphic microsa- pediatric/adolescent GISTs, in order to investigate tellite marker at the SDHA locus. For this, PCRs whether immunohistochemistry could identify were carried out with fluorescence-labeled primers SDHA-mutated GISTs. (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) (primer sequences are available on request) for 35 cycles with an annealing temperature of 60 1C, and amplified products were Materials and methods analyzed, along with LIZ 500 size standard (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), using capillary Twenty-four adult wild-type GISTs diagnosed in, or electrophoresis on an ABI 3130-XL genetic analyzer referred to, the Erasmus University Medical Center (Applied Biosystems). Data were analyzed using (Rotterdam, The Netherlands) between 1999 and GeneMarker software (Soft-Genetics LLC, State 2011 were included in this study. In addition, seven College, PA, USA). pediatric and two adolescent wild-type cases from the files of Professor M O’Sullivan, Dublin, were included in this study. We considered a GIST as ‘pediatric’ if the tumor was diagnosed below the age of 18 years and ‘adolescent’ if the age at diagnosis Results was 19–25 years. All these GISTs previously Case series resulted negative for KIT and PDGFRA mutations (KIT: exon 8, 9, 11, 13 and 17; PDGFRA: exon 12, 14 Case 1. A 41-year-old woman was diagnosed with and 18). Clinicopathological features of all these a gastric GIST. Microscopy showed an epithelioid cases are shown in Table 1. The tissues were used in morphology and the tumor cells stained positive for accordance with the code of conduct Proper Sec- CD117 and DOG-1 during routine diagnostic work- ondary Use of Human Tissue established by the up. Sequencing analysis of exons 8, 9, 11, 13 and 17 Dutch Federation of Medical Scientific Societies of the KIT proto-oncogene and exons 12, 14 and 18 (http://www.federa.org). The Medical Ethical Com- of the PDGFRA gene did not reveal mutations. In mittee of the Erasmus MC approved the study (MEC- previous research, this GIST was tested by SDHB 2011-519). immunohistochemistry.17 The GIST was First, all GISTs were analyzed with SDHB im- immunonegative for SDHB and SDHA (Figure 1). munohistochemistry. If the tumors were SDHB Mutational analysis revealed a germline SDHA negative, SDHA immunohistochemistry was per- mutation c.91 C4T leading to p.Arg31X. This formed. Immunohistochemical analysis was per- patient was homozygous (not informative) for the formed on 4–5 mm sections of formalin-fixed para- microsatellite marker, so we could not show LOH, ffin-embedded tumor as previously described.20,21 though relative loss of the wild-type allele was seen Slides were considered suitable if the internal in the sequencing graph (Figure
Recommended publications
  • Genomic and Transcriptomic Alterations Associated with Drug Vulnerabilities and Prognosis in Adenocarcinoma at the Gastroesophageal Junction
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19949-6 OPEN Genomic and transcriptomic alterations associated with drug vulnerabilities and prognosis in adenocarcinoma at the gastroesophageal junction Yuan Lin1,8, Yingying Luo 2,8, Yanxia Sun 2,8, Wenjia Guo 2,3,8, Xuan Zhao2,8, Yiyi Xi2, Yuling Ma 2, ✉ ✉ Mingming Shao2, Wen Tan2, Ge Gao 1,4 , Chen Wu 2,5,6 & Dongxin Lin2,5,7 1234567890():,; Adenocarcinoma at the gastroesophageal junction (ACGEJ) has dismal clinical outcomes, and there are currently few specific effective therapies because of limited knowledge on its genomic and transcriptomic alterations. The present study investigates genomic and tran- scriptomic changes in ACGEJ from Chinese patients and analyzes their drug vulnerabilities and associations with the survival time. Here we show that the major genomic changes of Chinese ACGEJ patients are chromosome instability promoted tumorigenic focal copy- number variations and COSMIC Signature 17-featured single nucleotide variations. We provide a comprehensive profile of genetic changes that are potentially vulnerable to existing therapeutic agents and identify Signature 17-correlated IFN-α response pathway as a prog- nostic marker that might have practical value for clinical prognosis of ACGEJ. These findings further our understanding on the molecular biology of ACGEJ and may help develop more effective therapeutic strategies. 1 Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics (ICG), Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing, China. 2 Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 3 Cancer Institute, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Paraganglioma (PGL) Tumors in Patients with Succinate Dehydrogenase-Related PCC–PGL Syndromes: a Clinicopathological and Molecular Analysis
    T G Papathomas and others Non-PCC/PGL tumors in the SDH 170:1 1–12 Clinical Study deficiency Non-pheochromocytoma (PCC)/paraganglioma (PGL) tumors in patients with succinate dehydrogenase-related PCC–PGL syndromes: a clinicopathological and molecular analysis Thomas G Papathomas1, Jose Gaal1, Eleonora P M Corssmit2, Lindsey Oudijk1, Esther Korpershoek1, Ketil Heimdal3, Jean-Pierre Bayley4, Hans Morreau5, Marieke van Dooren6, Konstantinos Papaspyrou7, Thomas Schreiner8, Torsten Hansen9, Per Arne Andresen10, David F Restuccia1, Ingrid van Kessel6, Geert J L H van Leenders1, Johan M Kros1, Leendert H J Looijenga1, Leo J Hofland11, Wolf Mann7, Francien H van Nederveen12, Ozgur Mete13,14, Sylvia L Asa13,14, Ronald R de Krijger1,15 and Winand N M Dinjens1 1Department of Pathology, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2Department of Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden,The Netherlands, 3Section for Clinical Genetics, Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 4Department of Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, 5Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, 6Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 7Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany, 8Section for Specialized Endocrinology,
    [Show full text]
  • Download Via Github on RNA-Seq and Chip-Seq Data Analysis and the University of And/Or Bioconductor [33–35, 38–40]
    Kumka and Bauer BMC Genomics (2015) 16:895 DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-2162-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Analysis of the FnrL regulon in Rhodobacter capsulatus reveals limited regulon overlap with orthologues from Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Escherichia coli Joseph E. Kumka and Carl E. Bauer* Abstract Background: FNR homologues constitute an important class of transcription factors that control a wide range of anaerobic physiological functions in a number of bacterial species. Since FNR homologues are some of the most pervasive transcription factors, an understanding of their involvement in regulating anaerobic gene expression in different species sheds light on evolutionary similarity and differences. To address this question, we used a combination of high throughput RNA-Seq and ChIP-Seq analysis to define the extent of the FnrL regulon in Rhodobacter capsulatus and related our results to that of FnrL in Rhodobacter sphaeroides and FNR in Escherichia coli. Results: Our RNA-seq results show that FnrL affects the expression of 807 genes, which accounts for over 20 % of the Rba. capsulatus genome. ChIP-seq results indicate that 42 of these genes are directly regulated by FnrL. Importantly, this includes genes involved in the synthesis of the anoxygenic photosystem. Similarly, FnrL in Rba. sphaeroides affects 24 % of its genome, however, only 171 genes are differentially expressed in common between two Rhodobacter species, suggesting significant divergence in regulation. Conclusions: We show that FnrL in Rba. capsulatus activates photosynthesis while in Rba. sphaeroides FnrL regulation reported to involve repression of the photosystem. This analysis highlights important differences in transcriptional control of photosynthetic events and other metabolic processes controlled by FnrL orthologues in closely related Rhodobacter species.
    [Show full text]
  • About SDHD Gene Mutations
    About SDHD Gene Mutations About Genes Recommendations Genes are in every cell in our bodies. Genes are made Knowing if you have an SDHD mutation can help you of DNA, which gives instructions to cells about how to grow manage your medical care. and work together. We have two copies of each gene in each cell—one from our mother and one from our father. When MEN AND WOMEN genes work right, they help stop cancer cells from developing. If you know you have an SDHD mutation, it is important If one copy of a gene has a mutation, it cannot function as it to find tumors early. It is also important to tell your doctor should. This increases the risk for certain cancers. that you have this mutation before any medical procedures. TheSDH genes have instructions for turning food into energy Recommendations may vary according to your age. and helping fix mistakes in DNA. The four genes involved are Ages 8-18: SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD. If there is a mutation in one • MRI of the whole body every 2-3 years of these genes, it can cause cells to grow and divide too much. This • Neck MRI every 2-3 years can lead to tumors called paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas. These tumors are often benign (non-cancerous) but can be Adults: cancer and spread in some cases. This condition is called • PET/CT scan as your doctor recommends hereditary paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma syndrome. All ages: Paragangliomas and Pheochromocytomas • Physical exam every year with blood pressure check Paragangliomas (PGLs) are slow-growing tumors that develop • Blood test every year along nerves or blood vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2: an Overview Jessica Moline, MS1, and Charis Eng, MD, Phd1,2,3,4
    GENETEST REVIEW Genetics in Medicine Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2: An overview Jessica Moline, MS1, and Charis Eng, MD, PhD1,2,3,4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Clinical Description of MEN 2 .......................................................................755 Surveillance...................................................................................................760 Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (OMIM# 171400) ....................756 Medullary thyroid carcinoma ................................................................760 Familial medullary thyroid carcinoma (OMIM# 155240).....................756 Pheochromocytoma ................................................................................760 Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B (OMIM# 162300) ....................756 Parathyroid adenoma or hyperplasia ...................................................761 Diagnosis and testing......................................................................................756 Hypoparathyroidism................................................................................761 Clinical diagnosis: MEN 2A........................................................................756 Agents/circumstances to avoid .................................................................761 Clinical diagnosis: FMTC ............................................................................756 Testing of relatives at risk...........................................................................761 Clinical diagnosis: MEN 2B ........................................................................756
    [Show full text]
  • Generated by SRI International Pathway Tools Version 25.0, Authors S
    Authors: Pallavi Subhraveti Peter D Karp Ingrid Keseler An online version of this diagram is available at BioCyc.org. Biosynthetic pathways are positioned in the left of the cytoplasm, degradative pathways on the right, and reactions not assigned to any pathway are in the far right of the cytoplasm. Transporters and membrane proteins are shown on the membrane. Anamika Kothari Periplasmic (where appropriate) and extracellular reactions and proteins may also be shown. Pathways are colored according to their cellular function. Gcf_000442315Cyc: Rubellimicrobium thermophilum DSM 16684 Cellular Overview Connections between pathways are omitted for legibility. Ron Caspi lipid II (meso phosphate diaminopimelate sn-glycerol containing) phosphate dCTP 3-phosphate predicted ABC RS07495 RS12165 RS03605 transporter RS13105 of phosphate lipid II (meso dCTP sn-glycerol diaminopimelate phosphate 3-phosphate containing) phosphate Secondary Metabolite Degradation Storage Compound Biosynthesis Tetrapyrrole Biosynthesis Hormone Biosynthesis Aromatic Compound Aldehyde Degradation UDP-N-acetyl- Biosynthesis undecaprenyl- a mature (4R)-4-hydroxy- an L-glutamyl- a [protein]-L- queuosine at Macromolecule Modification myo-inositol degradation I α-D-glucosamine adenosylcobinamide a purine L-canavanine 5'-deoxyadenosine sec Metabolic Regulator Biosynthesis Amine and Polyamine Biosynthesis polyhydroxybutanoate biosynthesis siroheme biosynthesis methylglyoxal degradation I diphospho-N- peptidoglycan 2-oxoglutarate Gln β-isoaspartate glu position 34 ser a tRNA indole-3-acetate
    [Show full text]
  • First-Positive Surveillance Screening in an Asymptomatic SDHA Germline Mutation Carrier
    ID: 19-0005 -19-0005 G White and others SDHA surveillance screen ID: 19-0005; May 2019 detected PGL DOI: 10.1530/EDM-19-0005 First-positive surveillance screening in an asymptomatic SDHA germline mutation carrier Correspondence should be addressed Gemma White, Nicola Tufton and Scott A Akker to S A Akker Email Department of Endocrinology, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK [email protected] Summary At least 40% of phaeochromocytomas and paraganglioma’s (PPGLs) are associated with an underlying genetic mutation. The understanding of the genetic landscape of these tumours has rapidly evolved, with 18 associated genes now identified.Amongthese,mutationsinthesubunitsofsuccinatedehydrogenasecomplex(SDH) are the most common, causing around half of familial PPGL cases. Occurrence of PPGLs in carriers of SDHB, SDHC and SDHD subunit mutations has been long reported, but it is only recently that variants in the SDHA subunit have been linked to PPGL formation. Previously documented cases have, to our knowledge, only been found in isolated cases where pathogenic SDHA variants wereidentifiedretrospectively.Wereportthecaseofanasymptomaticsuspectedcarotidbodytumourfoundduring surveillance screening in a 72-year-old female who is a known carrier of a germline SDHA pathogenic variant. To our knowledge,thisisthefirstscreenthatdetectedPPGLfoundinapreviouslyidentifiedSDHA pathogenic variant carrier, duringsurveillanceimaging.Thisfindingsupportstheuseofcascadegenetictestingandsurveillancescreeninginall carriers of a pathogenic SDHA variant. Learning points: •• SDH mutations are important causes of PPGL disease. •• SDHA is much rarer compared to SDHB and SDHD mutations. •• Pathogenicity and penetrance are yet to be fully determined in cases of SDHA-related PPGL. •• Surveillance screening should be used for SDHA PPGL cases to identify recurrence, metastasis or metachronous disease. •• Surveillance screening for SDH-relateddiseaseshouldbeperformedinidentifiedcarriersofapathogenicSDHA variant.
    [Show full text]
  • Amplification of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Gene Is Associated with a Microsatellite Stable Status in Chinese Gastric Cancer Patients
    387 Original Article Amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene is associated with a microsatellite stable status in Chinese gastric cancer patients He Huang1#, Zhengkun Wang2#, Yi Li2, Qun Zhao3, Zhaojian Niu2 1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China; 2Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China; 3Department of Gastrosurgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China Contributions: I) Conception and design: Z Niu, Q Zhao, H Huang; (II) Administrative support: Z Niu, H Huang, Z Wang; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: All authors; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: Z Wang, Q Zhao; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: Z Niu, H Huang; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. #These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence to: Zhaojian Niu. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 16, Jiangsu Road, Shinan District, Qingdao 260003, China. Email: [email protected]; Qun Zhao. Department of Gastrosurgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang 050011, China. Email: [email protected]. Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. However, little is known about the combination of HER2 amplification and microsatellite instability (MSI) status in GC. This study aimed to analyze the correlation of HER2 amplification with microsatellite instability (MSI) status, clinical characteristics, and the tumor mutational burden (TMB) of patients. Methods: A total of 192 gastric cancer (GC) patients were enrolled in this cohort. To analyze genomic alterations (GAs), deep sequencing was performed on 450 target cancer genes.
    [Show full text]
  • High Prevalence of Occult Paragangliomas in Asymptomatic Carriers of SDHD and SDHB Gene Mutations
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2013) 21, 469–470 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1018-4813/13 www.nature.com/ejhg SHORT REPORT High prevalence of occult paragangliomas in asymptomatic carriers of SDHD and SDHB gene mutations Berdine L Heesterman*,1, Jean Pierre Bayley2, Carli M Tops3, Frederik J Hes3, Bernadette TJ van Brussel3, Eleonora PM Corssmit4, Jaap F Hamming5, Andel GL van der Mey1 and Jeroen C Jansen1 Hereditary paraganglioma is a benign tumor syndrome with an age-dependent penetrance. Carriers of germline mutations in the SDHB or SDHD genes may develop parasympathetic paragangliomas in the head and neck region or sympathetic catecholamine-secreting abdominal and thoracic paragangliomas (pheochromocytomas). In this study, we aimed to establish paraganglioma risk in 101 asymptomatic germline mutation carriers and evaluate the results of our surveillance regimen. Asymptomatic carriers of an SDHD or SDHB mutation were included once disease status was established by MRI diagnosis. Clinical surveillance revealed a head and neck paraganglioma in 28 of the 47 (59.6%) asymptomatic SDHD mutation carriers. Risk of tumor development was significantly lower in SDHB mutation carriers: 2/17 (11.8%, P ¼ 0.001). Sympathetic paragangliomas were encountered in two SDHD mutation carriers and in one SDHB mutation carrier. In conclusion, asymptomatic carriers of an SDHD mutation are at a high risk for occult parasympathetic paraganglioma. SDHB carrier risk is considerably lower, consistent with lower penetrance of SDHB
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer Susceptibility
    Clinical Appropriateness Guidelines Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer Susceptibility EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 2, 2020 Appropriate.Safe.Affordable © 2019 AIM Specialty Health 2070-0319 Table of Contents Scope ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Genetic Counseling Requirement ................................................................................................................... 3 Appropriate Use Criteria .................................................................................................................................. 3 Multi-Gene Panel Testing .................................................................................................................... 4 Germline Testing Following Identification of a Somatic Mutation .................................................... 4 ® ® * National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN ) Criteria ......................................................... 5 CHEK2 ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Hereditary Paraganglioma-Pheochromocytoma Syndrome .............................................................. 6 Prostate Cancer.................................................................................................................................... 6 PALB2 ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Is CHEK2 a Moderate-Risk Breast Cancer Gene Or the Younger Sister Of
    BMJ Case Rep: first published as 10.1136/bcr-2020-236435 on 7 September 2020. Downloaded from Reminder of important clinical lesson Case report Is CHEK2 a moderate- risk breast cancer gene or the younger sister of Li- Fraumeni? Dilanka L De Silva ,1,2 Ingrid Winship3,4 1Department of Genetics, Royal SUMMARY (OR 3.3; 95% CI 2.3–4.7).8 CHEK2 in linked Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, The CHEK2 gene is mostly considered as a moderate with multiple cancers including prostate cancer: Victoria, Australia 1100delC mutation (OR 3.29; 95% CI 1.85–5.85; 2 breast cancer gene with the result that many clinicians Department of Genetics, Peter have a narrow focus. We present the 10- year journey of p=0.00) and I157T missense mutation (OR 1.80; MacCallum Cancer Institute, 95% CI 1.51–2.14; p=0.00).9 The age-adjusted and Melbourne, Victoria, Australia a man who had five different cancers and had iterative 3 sex- adjusted HRs were 5.76 (95% CI 2.12–15.6) Department of Clinical genetic testing including for Li-F raumeni syndrome, Genetics, The Royal Melbourne eventually to discover a pathogenic variant in the CHEK2 for stomach cancer, 3.61 (95% CI 1.33–9.79) for Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, gene, possibly explaining his numerous cancers. This kidney cancer and 3.45 (95% CI 1.09–10.9) for 10 Australia diagnosis offered him closure which he had desperately sarcoma, and in a meta- analysis of a total of six 4Department of Medicine, sought for well over a decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Germline SDHB and SDHD Mutations in Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Patients
    ID: 18-0325 7 12 Y Huang et al. SDH gene mutations in 7:12 1217–1225 PCC/PGL RESEARCH Germline SDHB and SDHD mutations in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma patients Yiqiang Huang1, Lin-ang Wang1, Qiubo Xie1, Jian Pang1, Luofu Wang1, Yuting Yi2, Jun Zhang1, Yao Zhang1, Rongrong Chen2, Weihua Lan1, Dianzheng Zhang3 and Jun Jiang1 1Department of Urology, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China 2Geneplus-Beijing Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of China 3Department of Bio-Medical Sciences, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Correspondence should be addressed to J Jiang: [email protected] Abstract Pheochromocytoma and paragangliomas (PCC/PGL) are neuroendocrine tumors that Key Words arise from chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla and sympathetic/parasympathetic f PCC/PGL ganglia, respectively. Of clinical relevance regarding diagnosis is the highly variable f SDHB presentation of symptoms in PCC/PGL patients. To date, the clear-cut correlations f SDHD between the genotypes and phenotypes of PCC/PGL have not been entirely f genotype–phenotype established. In this study, we reviewed the medical records of PCC/PGL patients with correlation pertinent clinical, laboratory and genetic information. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed on patient samples revealed specific germline mutations in the SDHB (succinate dehydrogenase complex iron-sulfur subunit B) and SDHD (succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit D) genes and these mutations were validated by Sanger sequencing. Of the 119 patients, two were identified withSDHB mutation and one with SDHD mutation. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was used to analyze the expression of these mutated genes.
    [Show full text]