DOCSLIB.ORG

White River Watershed Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
White River Watershed Assessment 5/25/2004 White River Watershed Assessment White River Watershed Assessment Prepared by Wasco County Soil and Water Conservation District For White River Watershed Council Principal Authors: Karen Lamson Jennifer Shannon Clark, Wasco County Soil and Water Conservation District The Dalles OR. Walkin’plow near Pine Grove from Chaff in the Wind, published by Friends of Maupin Library Copies of the White River Watershed Assessment are available in electronic or paper format from [email protected], or by contacting Wasco County SWCD at 2325 River Road, Suite 3, The Dalles OR 97058 or (541) 296-6178 x119. 1 5/25/2004 White River Watershed Assessment 2 5/25/2004 White River Watershed Assessment Introduction This Assessment has been undertaken by the White River Watershed Council, in partnership with the Wasco County Soil and Water Conservation District. The purpose of the Assessment is to provide a description of conditions and trends in the White River Watershed relevant to conservation of its natural resources. The objective is to discover where natural resources or processes are working, and where they need to be restored, particularly in regards to fish habitat and water quality. The term “watershed” describes an area of land that drains downslope to the lowest point. A watershed consists of a network of drainage pathways that can be underground, or on the surface. These pathways converge into a stream and river system as the water moves downstream. The White River Watershed includes all of the waters that drain into the White River, between its headwaters on the flanks of Mt. Hood, to its mouth where it joins the Deschutes River. Because of the connectivity between groundwater, wetlands, streams and rivers within a watershed, any activity that affects the water quality, quantity, or rate of movement at one location may influence characteristics of the watershed at locations downstream. Everyone who lives, works, or plays within the watershed is part of this system. The format used in this Assessment follows the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual, developed for the Governor’s Watershed Enhancement Board (July 1999). The assessment examines the history of the watershed, describes its features, evaluates its resources, and identifies issues within the watershed. Characteristics and processes of the watershed as a whole are analyzed, as well as conditions specific to individual streams. Humans have used the resources of the White River Watershed from as early as 10,000BC. Fish, wild game, and plant foods supported inhabitants for thousands of years. Many people lived and fished along salmon-bearing rivers and streams in the region, including the lower White River. In the mid 1800s the Barlow Road was established along the Oregon Trail through the White River basin. This overland route was the only alternative for emigrants to finishing the cross-continent journey via rafts down the Columbia river from present-day The Dalles. Thousands of people and their animals and belongings passed over this toll road. Today the Barlow Road is designated as a National Historic District. In 1855, the US Government signed a treaty with the tribes of Middle Oregon. As a condition of this treaty, the Tenino and Wasco Indians ceded most of their traditional lands to the United States of America, and moved to the Warm Springs Indian Reservation. The Tribes reserved exclusive right to fish within reservation boundaries and the right to hunt, fish and gather in common with citizens of the USA at all other usual and accustomed places, including ceded lands. Following this treaty, American pioneer families began to move into the White River Watershed. With the Donation Land Act of 1850 and the Homestead Act of 1863 Euro-Americans settled and built towns in the valleys, bringing livestock, and establishing logging operations in the upland forests. Forest Reserves were established by the federal government in 1891, leading to the establishment of the Oregon National Forest in 1908, renamed as the Mt Hood National Forest in 1924. In 1988 the White River was designated by Congress as a National Wild and Scenic River. Today lands in the watershed are predominantly used for agriculture, timber, and recreation, with a local economy developed around irrigated agriculture. Agriculture in the basin is centered on production of livestock, hay, and dryland and irrigated grains. Irrigation provides important pasture and winter feed for livestock, with most of the water coming from tributaries of the White River. Public lands represent over half of the acreage of the Watershed, and include the Mt. Hood National Forest and Badger Creek Wilderness Area, the Barlow Trail National Historic District, and the state owned White River Wildlife Management Area. Visitors from the surrounding region make increasing use of public lands for recreational assets and scenic beauty. It is the intent of this Assessment to provide a reference point from which the stakeholders in the White River Watershed, those who live and work here, can continue to plan for the health of its lands and waters into the future. 3 5/25/2004 White River Watershed Assessment CONTENTS: 1) WATERSHED DESCRIPTION.......................................................................................................8 1.1) PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................................................8 1.2) SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC BACKGROUND .......................................................................................12 2) SETTLEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ......................................................................................14 2.1) NATIVE AMERICAN INHABITANTS AND LAND USE ......................................................................14 2.2) HISTORIC LAND COVER TYPES ....................................................................................................16 2.3) SETTLEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE...............................................................................18 2.4) LAND USE....................................................................................................................................21 3) STREAM FLOW AND WATER RIGHTS ...................................................................................21 3.1) STREAM FLOW.............................................................................................................................21 3.2) WATER RIGHTS............................................................................................................................21 4) IRRIGATION AND WATER MANAGEMENT..........................................................................21 4.1) IRRIGATION DISTRICTS ................................................................................................................21 5) RUNOFF AND EROSION..............................................................................................................21 5.1) RUNOFF DUE TO LAND USE .........................................................................................................21 5.2) NONIRRIGATED CROPLAND EROSION ..........................................................................................21 5.3) ROADS .........................................................................................................................................21 6) WATER QUALITY.........................................................................................................................21 6.1) TEMPERATURE.............................................................................................................................21 6.2) SEDIMENT ....................................................................................................................................21 6.3) WASTEWATER .............................................................................................................................21 7) CHANNEL TYPES..........................................................................................................................21 7.1) CHANNEL HABITAT TYPE CLASSIFICATION .................................................................................21 7.2) CHANNEL MODIFICATION ............................................................................................................21 8) RIPARIAN AND WETLANDS CONDITIONS ...........................................................................21 8.1) RIPARIAN VEGETATION ...............................................................................................................21 8.2) WETLANDS ..................................................................................................................................21 9) AQUATIC HABITAT .....................................................................................................................21 9.1) NATIVE SPECIES ..........................................................................................................................21 9.2) INTRODUCED SPECIES ..................................................................................................................21 9.3) HABITAT CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................21 10) UPLAND HABITAT .....................................................................................................................21 10.1) PLANT COMMUNITIES ................................................................................................................21
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spring 2009 Newsletter
    Friends of the Columbia Gorge Protecting the Gorge Since 1980 Spring 2009 Newsletter Inside: Wilderness at Last! Page 4 Protecting Fragile Wildflowers Page 8 Featured Hike: Indian Point Page 11 Friends of the Columbia Gorge The Gorge Face BOARD OF DIRECTORS wilderness stretches Cynthia Winter* CHAIR to the ridgeline, Angie Moore VI C E CHAIR Stop a Mega-casino beyond the proposed Dick Springer SE C RETARY casino site (foreground). Karen Johnson TREA S URER Adjacent to New Ken Denis AT-LARGE ME M BER Photo: Kevin Gorman Rick Ray* AT-LARGE ME M BER Wilderness !( T. VIENTO 3 olumbia . C R. r (!14 !( N. Chris Beck C n S V 84 s i ¨¦§ WYETH t e o y a r n . !( r t a v t r a o H . C g G r 4 t i C !( a C 1 o m C n r 4 n r. a a p t 4 1 C i b Broughton H. Bishop 3 h h i . 7 r i r r a r m n !( h . e 3 !( n C C m s 4 Su C P E C n n . 6 r r a 4 e . 0 2 o 4 4 r 2 r 4 t 4 7 CASCADE . C 1 r r 8 y 1 a W o e Bowen Blair, Jr. LOCKS£ 0 s ¤ W 30 4 G d A n 7 000 amp Cr. i !( 2 C L 1 D 476 ! 4 ry T. !( COLUMBIA RIVER GORGE C R r 2 Susan Crowley* ud . 0 o r.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Freshwater Resources on Mount Hood National Forest Recommendations for Policy Changes
    PROTECTING FRESHWATER RESOURCES ON MOUNT HOOD NATIONAL FOREST RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY CHANGES Produced by PACIFIC RIVERS COUNCIL Protecting Freshwater Resources on Mount Hood National Forest Pacific Rivers Council January 2013 Fisherman on the Salmon River Acknowledgements This report was produced by John Persell, in partnership with Bark and made possible by funding from The Bullitt Foundation and The Wilburforce Foundation. Pacific Rivers Council thanks the following for providing relevant data and literature, reviewing drafts of this paper, offering important discussions of issues, and otherwise supporting this project. Alex P. Brown, Bark Dale A. McCullough, Ph.D. Susan Jane Brown Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fisheries Commission Western Environmental Law Center G. Wayne Minshall, Ph.D. Lori Ann Burd, J.D. Professor Emeritus, Idaho State University Dennis Chaney, Friends of Mount Hood Lisa Moscinski, Gifford Pinchot Task Force Matthew Clark Thatch Moyle Patrick Davis Jonathan J. Rhodes, Planeto Azul Hydrology Rock Creek District Improvement Company Amelia Schlusser Richard Fitzgerald Pacific Rivers Council 2011 Legal Intern Pacific Rivers Council 2012 Legal Intern Olivia Schmidt, Bark Chris A. Frissell, Ph.D. Mary Scurlock, J.D. Doug Heiken, Oregon Wild Kimberly Swan Courtney Johnson, Crag Law Center Clackamas River Water Providers Clair Klock Steve Whitney, The Bullitt Foundation Klock Farm, Corbett, Oregon Thomas Wolf, Oregon Council Trout Unlimited Bronwen Wright, J.D. Pacific Rivers Council 317 SW Alder Street, Suite 900 Portland, OR 97204 503.228.3555 | 503.228.3556 fax [email protected] pacificrivers.org Protecting Freshwater Resources on Mt. Hood National Forest: 2 Recommendations for Policy Change Table of Contents Executive Summary iii Part One: Introduction—An Urban Forest 1 Part Two: Watersheds of Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bill to Designate Certain National Forest System Lands in the State of Oregon for Inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for Other Purposes
    97 H.R.7340 Title: A bill to designate certain National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Weaver, James H. [OR-4] (introduced 12/1/1982) Cosponsors (2) Latest Major Action: 12/15/1982 Failed of passage/not agreed to in House. Status: Failed to Receive 2/3's Vote to Suspend and Pass by Yea-Nay Vote: 247 - 141 (Record Vote No: 454). SUMMARY AS OF: 12/9/1982--Reported to House amended, Part I. (There is 1 other summary) (Reported to House from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs with amendment, H.Rept. 97-951 (Part I)) Oregon Wilderness Act of 1982 - Designates as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System the following lands in the State of Oregon: (1) the Columbia Gorge Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (2) the Salmon-Huckleberry Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (3) the Badger Creek Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (4) the Hidden Wilderness in the Mount Hood and Willamette National Forests; (5) the Middle Santiam Wilderness in the Willamette National Forest; (6) the Rock Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (7) the Cummins Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (8) the Boulder Creek Wilderness in the Umpqua National Forest; (9) the Rogue-Umpqua Divide Wilderness in the Umpqua and Rogue River National Forests; (10) the Grassy Knob Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou National Forest; (11) the Red Buttes Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou
    [Show full text]
  • OR Wild -Backmatter V2
    208 OREGON WILD Afterword JIM CALLAHAN One final paragraph of advice: do not burn yourselves out. Be as I am — a reluctant enthusiast.... a part-time crusader, a half-hearted fanatic. Save the other half of your- selves and your lives for pleasure and adventure. It is not enough to fight for the land; it is even more important to enjoy it. While you can. While it is still here. So get out there and hunt and fish and mess around with your friends, ramble out yonder and explore the forests, climb the mountains, bag the peaks, run the rivers, breathe deep of that yet sweet and lucid air, sit quietly for awhile and contemplate the precious still- ness, the lovely mysterious and awesome space. Enjoy yourselves, keep your brain in your head and your head firmly attached to the body, the body active and alive and I promise you this much: I promise you this one sweet victory over our enemies, over those desk-bound men with their hearts in a safe-deposit box and their eyes hypnotized by desk calculators. I promise you this: you will outlive the bastards. —Edward Abbey1 Edward Abbey. Ed, take it from another Ed, not only can wilderness lovers outlive wilderness opponents, we can also defeat them. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men (sic) UNIVERSITY, SHREVEPORT UNIVERSITY, to do nothing. MES SMITH NOEL COLLECTION, NOEL SMITH MES NOEL COLLECTION, MEMORIAL LIBRARY, LOUISIANA STATE LOUISIANA LIBRARY, MEMORIAL —Edmund Burke2 JA Edmund Burke. 1 Van matre, Steve and Bill Weiler.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 98-328-June 26, 1984
    98 STAT. 272 PUBLIC LAW 98-328-JUNE 26, 1984 Public Law 98-328 98th Congress An Act June 26, 1984 To designate certain national forest system and other lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes. [H.R. 1149] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Oregon United States ofAmerica in Congress assembled, That this Act may Wilderness Act be referred to as the "Oregon Wilderness Act of 1984". of 1984. National SEc. 2. (a) The Congress finds that- Wilderness (1) many areas of undeveloped National Forest System land in Preservation the State of Oregon possess outstanding natural characteristics System. which give them high value as wilderness and will, if properly National Forest preserved, contribute as an enduring resource of wilderness for System. the ben~fit of the American people; (2) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation (RARE II) of National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon and the related congressional review of such lands have identified areas which, on the basis of their landform, ecosystem, associated wildlife, and location, will help to fulfill the National Forest System's share of a quality National Wilderness Preservation System; and (3) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation of National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon and the related congressional review of such lands have also identified areas which do not possess outstand­ ing wilderness attributes or which possess outstanding energy, mineral, timber, grazing, dispersed recreation and other values and which should not now be designated as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System but should be avail­ able for nonwilderness multiple uses under the land manage­ ment planning process and other applicable laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Mt. Hood National Forest Wild and Scenic River Analysis User
    United States Department of Agriculture User Capacity Report Mt. Hood National Forest Wild and Scenic River Analysis 2019 Forest Service Report prepared by: Elizabeth (Sousa) Whitt, Recreational Specialist Finalized January 23, 2020 For More Information Contact: Jennifer Watts, Public Services Staff Officer 16400 Champion Way Sandy, OR 97055 [email protected] 503-668-1795 Or Elizabeth Whitt [email protected] 775-276-2876 We make every effort to create documents that are accessible to individuals of all abilities; however, limitations with our word processing programs may prevent some parts of this document from being readable by computer-assisted reading devices. If you need assistance with any part of this document, please contact the Mt. Hood National Forest at 503-668-1795. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Mt. Hood
    Forest Service PaCiflC Northwest Region Environmental Assessment Mt. Hood National Forest a: USDA Forest Service nagement White River National Wild and Scenic River Environmental Assessment Deciding Officials: Mike Edrington, Forest Supervisor Mt. Hood National Forest 2955 N.W. Division Gresham, OR 97030 James L. Hancock, District Manager Prineville District: Bureau of Land Management 185 E. 4th Street Prineville, OR 97754 For Further Information: Diana L. Ross Mt. Hood National Forest Bear Springs Ranger District (503) 328-6211 Berry Phelps Bureau of Land Management Prineville District Office (503) 447-4115 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I : Need for the Proposal ....... , ..................... , II l-l Introduction ............................................. 1-I PurposeandNeed ....................................... l-l The Decisions Needed. ................................... l-l Background ............................................. l-l Legislation ........................................... I-l Planning Mandate ..................................... I-2 Summary of the Resource Assessment ..................... I-6 Issues ................................................. l-8 Existing Plans, Policies, and Agreements ...................... l-l 5 US Forest Service ..................................... l-15 Bureau of Land Management ............................ I-l 5 US Fish and Wildlife Service ............................. I-l 5 Conferated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon . I-l 6 Land Conservation and Development and County
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 111-11
    PUBLIC LAW 111–11—MAR. 30, 2009 123 STAT. 991 Public Law 111–11 111th Congress An Act To designate certain land as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, to authorize certain programs and activities in the Department of the Mar. 30, 2009 Interior and the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes. [H.R. 146] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Omnibus Public Land SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Management Act (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Omnibus of 2009. Public Land Management Act of 2009’’. 16 USC 1 note. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. TITLE I—ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM Subtitle A—Wild Monongahela Wilderness Sec. 1001. Designation of wilderness, Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. Sec. 1002. Boundary adjustment, Laurel Fork South Wilderness, Monongahela Na­ tional Forest. Sec. 1003. Monongahela National Forest boundary confirmation. Sec. 1004. Enhanced Trail Opportunities. Subtitle B—Virginia Ridge and Valley Wilderness Sec. 1101. Definitions. Sec. 1102. Designation of additional National Forest System land in Jefferson Na­ tional Forest as wilderness or a wilderness study area. Sec. 1103. Designation of Kimberling Creek Potential Wilderness Area, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1104. Seng Mountain and Bear Creek Scenic Areas, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1105. Trail plan and development. Sec. 1106. Maps and boundary descriptions. Sec. 1107. Effective date. Subtitle C—Mt. Hood Wilderness, Oregon Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 HIKES CHALLENGE Join the 50 Hikes Challenge from May 1 Through October 31, 2014
    Oregon Wild presents: 50 HIKES CHALLENGE Join the 50 Hikes Challenge from May 1 through October 31, 2014. Hike in as many of the following designated or proposed Wilderness areas as you can and track your progress below. Join us on a guided hike or set out on your own. Oregon Wild members will receive prizes for completing 10 or more Wilderness adventures. Write the date of your completed adventure under each area below. Send us your log and trail photos (or Instagram name) when finished. � Badger Creek Wilderness � Lower White River Wilderness � Roaring River Wilderness � Black Canyon Wilderness � Mark O. Hatfield Wilderness � Rock Creek Wilderness � Boulder Creek Wilderness � Menagerie Wilderness � Rogue-Umpqua Divide � Bridge Creek Wilderness � Middle Santiam Wilderness Wilderness � Bull of the Woods Wilderness � Mill Creek Wilderness � Salmon-Huckleberry Wilderness � Clackamas Wilderness � Monument Rock Wilderness � Sky Lakes Wilderness � Copper Salmon Wilderness � Mount Hood Wilderness � Soda Mountain Wilderness � Crater Lake Proposed � Mount Jefferson Wilderness � Spring Basin Wilderness � Cummins Creek Wilderness � Mount Thielsen Wilderness � Steens Mountain Wilderness � Diamond Peak Wilderness � Mount Washington Wilderness � Strawberry Mountain Wilderness � Devil’s Staircase Proposed � Mountain Lakes Wilderness � Table Rock Wilderness � Drift Creek Wilderness � North Fork John Day Wilderness � Three Sisters Wilderness � Eagle Cap Wilderness � North Fork Umatilla Wilderness � Waldo Lake Wilderness � Gearhart Mountain Wilderness � Opal Creek Wilderness � Wenaha-Tucannon Wilderness � Grassy Knob Wilderness � Oregon Badlands Wilderness � Wild Rogue Wilderness � Hells Canyon Wilderness � Owyhee Canyonlands Proposed � Wild Rogue Proposed Wilderness � Kalmiopsis Wilderness � Red Buttes Wilderness � Whychus-Deschutes Proposed Learn more and register at www.oregonwild.org/50hikes.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower White River Wilderness Area Brochure
    LOWER WHITE RIVER The United States Congress designated the Low- er White River Wilderness in 2009 and it now has a total of 2,806 acres. All of this wilderness is lo- cated in Oregon and is managed by the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service. The White River rises in the high Cascades in western Wasco County, in the Mount Hood Na- tional Forest on the southeast flank of Mount Hood. The headwaters are just below White River Glacier in White River Canyon. Additions to the Mount Hood Wilderness protect upper por- tions of the river, while the Lower White River Wilderness, southeast of the majestic Mount Hood Wilderness and east of highway 26, protect a segment of lower White River stretch. Be sure to contact the BLM’s Prineville District or the Mt. Hood National Forest for the latest con- ditions and access to the spectacular Lower White River Wilderness Area! LOWER WHITE RIVER WILDERNESS s 0.5 ·0 •·0.5 1 Mile 0.5 0 0.5 1 Kilometer Surface m"""''o..- and lond OW!IOI8tip lo oubjact ID ongoing chango. Contacl the BLM Plilovillo Diotrict ollico for furlhor infonnotion. LEGEND Administered Land c::::J Lower White River/White River Forest Service Collector c==J US Forest Service Wilderness Boundary Road Number Bureau of Land Management BLM Lower White River 270 Forest Service Local c==J Wilderness Road Number 490A c:::::J State US Forest Service Forest Service - White Riwr Wilderness Trail Numbe - Warm Springs Indian State Highway Reservation - Existing Wild and Scenic River Paved Road c==J Private or Other No warnonty lo modo by tho Bureou or Land Uon_.ont 00 lo lho oocuraoy, noiobil~ or oomplatanooa of u- - for ;..-.al or Other Road aggregate ...., wllh olhor dlda.
    [Show full text]