Vrede Unge Mænd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Global Handbook on Hate Speech Laws Get
REBUILDING THE BULWARK OF LIBERTY Tool GLOBAL HANDBOOK ON HATE SPEECH LAWS By Natalie Alkiviadou, Jacob Mchangama and Raghav Mendiratta GLOBAL HANDBOOK ON HATE SPEECH LAWS © Justitia and the authors, 2020 WHO WE ARE Founded in August 2014, Justitia is Denmark’s first judicial think tank. Justitia aims to promote the rule of law and fundamental human rights and freedom rights, both within Denmark and abroad, by educating and influencing policy experts, decision-makers, and the public. In so doing, Justitia offers legal insight and analysis on a range of contemporary issues. The Future of Free Speech is a collaboration between Copenhagen based judicial think tank Justitia, Columbia University’s Global Freedom of Expression and Aarhus University’s Department of Political Science. Free speech is the bulwark of liberty; without it, no free and democratic society has ever been established or thrived. Free expression has been the basis of unprecedented scientific, social and political progress that has benefitted individuals, communities, nations and humanity itself. Millions of people derive protection, knowledge and essential meaning from the right to challenge power, question orthodoxy, expose corruption and address oppression, bigotry and hatred. At the Future of Free Speech, we believe that a robust and resilient culture of free speech must be the foundation for the future of any free, democratic society. We believe that, even as rapid technological change brings new challenges and threats, free speech must continue to serve as an essential ideal and a fundamental right for all people, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion, nationality, sexual orientation, gender or social standing. -
Overvågningens DNA
Ask Risom Bøge Overvågningens DNA En aktør-netværk-teoretisk undersøgelse af DNA i dansk politiarbejde Ph.d.-afhandling, Institut for Æstetik og Kommunikation Aarhus Universitet April 2015 Overvågningens DNA - en aktør-netværk-teoretisk undersøgelse af DNA i dansk politiarbejde © Ask Risom Bøge Forsideillustration: PublicDomainPictures, PixaBay Tryk: Fællestrykkeriet SUN-TRYK, Aarhus Universitet Denne afhandling er indsendt med henblik på opnåelse af ph.d.-graden ved Informationsvidenskab, Institut for Æstetik og Kommunikation, Aarhus Universitet INDHOLD Forord v Introduktion 7 Teoretiske bidrag 16 Analytiske bidrag 21 Afhandlingens struktur 26 Kapitel 1: En Oligoptisk Attitude 31 Kampen med panoptikonet 32 Oligoptikon som teori 40 Oligoptikon som metode 46 Attituden Samles 49 Afslutning 51 Kapitel 2: På sporet af DNA-profilen 53 Om at praktisere oligoptisk metode 53 Etnografisk-inspireret undersøgelse af praksis 55 Avisartikelstudie af DNA-profilens danske historie 59 Kapitel 3: Et genetisk fingeraftryk? Politiets begrænsede men foranderlige blik med DNA-profiler 63 En tur på DNA-profilens Möbius-bånd 64 Begrænsede og overlappende blikke 71 DNA-profilens multiplicitet 83 Konklusion 89 Kapitel 4: Truslerne mod blikket: om situeret viden, indadvendt overvågning og kontrol med DNA 91 Indadvendt overvågning og kontrol 92 Situeret arbejde med at finde og rense DNA-spor 96 Konklusion 103 Side | i Kapitel 5: Impulser og det udvidede blik med DNA 105 Oligoptika og Impulser 105 Forandringer af samarbejde og teknologi 108 Det udvidede blik med DNA 113 Konklusion 124 Kapitel 6: Oligoptiske events og blikkets inversion: Sagen om Amagermanden 127 Oligoptika og events 129 DNA-registret producerer events 131 Hittet der skabte et monster: Amagermanden bliver til 132 234 mulige Amagermænd 137 Tip nr. -
50. Møde 7) Eventuelt: 2
Tirsdag den 21. januar 2020 (D) 1 (Fremsættelse 28.11.2019. 1. behandling 06.12.2019. Betænkning 16.01.2020). 50. møde 7) Eventuelt: 2. behandling af lovforslag nr. L 85: Tirsdag den 21. januar 2020 kl. 13.00 Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om arbejdsløshedsforsikring m.v. (Afskaffelse af opholdskrav for ret til dagpenge m.v.). Af beskæftigelsesministeren (Peter Hummelgaard). Dagsorden (Fremsættelse 17.12.2019. 1. behandling 07.01.2020. Betænkning 20.01.2020). 1) Partilederdebat. 8) 2. behandling af lovforslag nr. L 63: 2) Spørgsmål om fremme af forespørgsel nr. F 32: Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om miljøbeskyttelse og embal‐ Forespørgsel til uddannelses- og forskningsministeren og børne- lageafgiftsloven. (Forbud mod gratis udlevering af bæreposer og og undervisningsministeren om at integrere klima- og bæredyg‐ forbud mod udlevering af tynde plastikbæreposer). tighedsdagsordenen i alle uddannelser. Af miljøministeren (Lea Wermelin). Af Jacob Mark (SF) og Astrid Carøe (SF). (Fremsættelse 14.11.2019. 1. behandling 22.11.2019. Betænkning (Anmeldelse 16.01.2020). 15.01.2020). 3) Fortsættelse af forespørgsel nr. F 2 [afstemning]: 9) 2. behandling af lovforslag nr. L 84: Forespørgsel til statsministeren om regeringens værdipolitik Forslag til lov om planter og plantesundhed m.v. med fokus på de udfordringer, der følger af indvandringen. Af ministeren for fødevarer, fiskeri og ligestilling (Mogens Jensen). Af Pia Kjærsgaard (DF) m.fl. (Fremsættelse 13.12.2019. 1. behandling 19.12.2019. Betænkning (Anmeldelse 02.10.2019. Fremme 08.10.2019. Forhandling 15.01.2020). 17.01.2020. Forslag til vedtagelse nr. V 46 af Pia Kjærsgaard (DF). Forslag til vedtagelse nr. -
The Proliferation of United Nations Special Procedures Mandates
Expanding or diluting Human Rights? The proliferation of United Nations Special Procedures mandates Article Published Version Freedman, R. and Mchangama, J. (2016) Expanding or diluting Human Rights? The proliferation of United Nations Special Procedures mandates. Human Rights Quarterly, 38 (1). pp. 164-193. ISSN 1085-794X doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2016.0012 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/66578/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . Published version at: http://muse.jhu.edu/article/609306 To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2016.0012 Publisher: The John Hopkins University Press All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online ([SDQGLQJRU'LOXWLQJ+XPDQ5LJKWV"7KH3UROLIHUDWLRQRI8QLWHG1DWLRQV 6SHFLDO3URFHGXUHV0DQGDWHV 5RVD)UHHGPDQ-DFRE0FKDQJDPD +XPDQ5LJKWV4XDUWHUO\9ROXPH1XPEHU)HEUXDU\SS $UWLFOH 3XEOLVKHGE\-RKQV+RSNLQV8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV '2,KUT )RUDGGLWLRQDOLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWWKLVDUWLFOH KWWSVPXVHMKXHGXDUWLFOH Access provided by University of Reading (11 Oct 2016 10:18 GMT) HUMAN RIGHTS QUARTERLY Expanding or Diluting Human Rights?: The Proliferation of United Nations Special Procedures Mandates Rosa Freedman* & Jacob Mchangama** ABSTRACT The United Nations Special Procedures system was described by former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan as “the crown jewel” of the UN Human Rights Machinery. Yet, in recent years, the system has expanded rapidly, driven by states creating new mandates frequently on topics not traditionally viewed as human rights. -
NEDOR HEROES! $ NEDOR HEROES! In8 Th.E9 U5SA
Roy Tho mas ’Sta nd ard Comi cs Fan zine OKAY,, AXIS—HERE COME THE GOLDEN AGE NEDOR HEROES! $ NEDOR HEROES! In8 th.e9 U5SA No.111 July 2012 . y e l o F e n a h S 2 1 0 2 © t r A 0 7 1 82658 27763 5 Vol. 3, No. 111 / July 2012 Editor Roy Thomas Associate Editors Bill Schelly Jim Amash Design & Layout Jon B. Cooke Consulting Editor John Morrow FCA Editor P.C. Hamerlinck Comic Crypt Editor Michael T. Gilbert Editorial Honor Roll Jerry G. Bails (founder) Ronn Foss, Biljo White, Mike Friedrich Proofreaders Rob Smentek, William J. Dowlding Cover Artist Shane Foley (after Frank Robbins & John Romita) Cover Colorist Tom Ziuko With Special Thanks to: Deane Aikins Liz Galeria Bob Mitsch Contents Heidi Amash Jeff Gelb Drury Moroz Ger Apeldoorn Janet Gilbert Brian K. Morris Writer/Editorial: Setting The Standard . 2 Mark Austin Joe Goggin Hoy Murphy Jean Bails Golden Age Comic Nedor-a-Day (website) Nedor Comic Index . 3 Matt D. Baker Book Stories (website) Michelle Nolan illustrated! John Baldwin M.C. Goodwin Frank Nuessel Michelle Nolan re-presents the 1968 salute to The Black Terror & co.— John Barrett Grand Comics Wayne Pearce “None Of Us Were Working For The Ages” . 49 Barry Bauman Database Charles Pelto Howard Bayliss Michael Gronsky John G. Pierce Continuing Jim Amash’s in-depth interview with comic art great Leonard Starr. Rod Beck Larry Guidry Bud Plant Mr. Monster’s Comic Crypt! Twice-Told DC Covers! . 57 John Benson Jennifer Hamerlinck Gene Reed Larry Bigman Claude Held Charles Reinsel Michael T. -
Grænser for Europa. Eu Mellem Nationalisme Og Globalisering
R A P P O R T S K E M A (til brug for aflæggelse af rapport for pulje C-bevillinger) Tilskudsmodtag er: FONDEN DE KØBENHAVNSKE FILMFESTIVALER / CPH:DOX Journalnr.: EUFC.2017-0109 Bevilget tilskud: 195.000 kr Projektets titel: GRÆNSER FOR EUROPA? EU MELLEM NATIONALISME OG GLOBALISERING Startdato: 1. marts 2018 Slutdato: 30. marts 2018 Som Danmarks største folkeoplysende kulturbegivenhed lancerede dokumentarfilmfestivalen CPH:DOX i marts 2018 et stort, landsdækkende oplysningsprojekt med fokus på EU’s fremtidige muligheder og udfordringer i krydsfeltet mellem globalisering og nationalisme. Projektet omfattede: - Debatarrangementer med danske og internationale politikere og tænkere - Dokumentarfilmvisninger i kulturhuse, biografer, biblioteker mv. i hele Danmark - Undervisningstiltag for tusinder af skole- og gymnasieelever Projektet forløb overordentligt succesfuldt. Vi havde et mål om afholdelse af minimum 75 arrangementer, men kom op på over 100 arrangementer, som for langt de flestes vedkommende trak fulde huse. Europas udfordringer med globalisering blev belyst gennem en lang række arrangementer, det samme gjaldt nationalisme - ligesom der naturligvis også var en lang række arrangementer, der knyttede direkte an til denne modstilling, fx filmene ‘EuroTrump’ om Geert Wilders, ‘Golden Dawn Girls’ om det græske parti Gyldent Daggry, 'The Other Side of Everything' om nationalisme på Balkan i dag, Our New President om forholdet mellem Europa og Rusland, fake news og truslen fra russiske 'trolde', 'Central Airport THF' om flygtningekrisens udfordring af Europa, den meget aktuelle 'Piazza Vittorio' om den stigende italienske modstand mod immigration, Foreigners Out om Østrigs højrefløj og mange, mange flere. Kort rapport om forløbet: Er aktivitetsmålene for projektet opnået? Anfør mål Aktivitetsmål: Afholdeldelse af 75 og beskriv opfyldelsen. -
Coronation Street Takes on Assisted Dying As Right-To-Die Cases Reach
BHA news BHA news www.humanism.org.uk Issue 1 2014 ‘The only possible basis for a sound morality is mutual tolerance and respect: tolerance of one another’s customs and opinions; respect for one another’s rights and feelings; awareness of one another’s needs.’ — A J Ayer, Humanist Coronation Street takes on assisted dying as right-to-die cases reach Supreme Court Coronation Street has broadcast one of its most memorable episodes, in which the character Hayley Cropper, played by BHA Distinguished Supporter Julie Hesmondhalgh, decides to commit suicide after becoming terminally ill with inoperable cancer. The episode in question was watched by over ten million viewers. Coronation Street’s brave tackling of this important ethical issue takes place as we await the Supreme Court’s judgement on the legal case to establish the right to an assisted death. During the hearings in December, we presented our Kate Rutter, portraying Suzie the humanist evidence in support of Jane Nicklinson, celebrant, at Hayley Cropper's funeral the widow of Tony Nicklinson, who sought and was denied an assisted death, and Humanist Funerals showcased on Paul Lamb, who is seeking the right to an Coronation Street assisted death after being paralysed in a road accident. We have been a party to We were very pleased that ITV producers same time as acknowledging the case throughout as an intervener. of Coronation Street chose to bid and celebrating all that the person The judgement will be announced later farewell to the much loved character of has achieved. this year. Hayley Cropper with a humanist funeral. -
Abstract This Scientific Research Examines the Purpose of the Exhibition of Peter Lundin’S Murder Weapon in 2012 at the Danish Police Museum in Copenhagen
Abstract This scientific research examines the purpose of the exhibition of Peter Lundin’s murder weapon in 2012 at The Danish Police Museum in Copenhagen. Furthermore, the project analyzes four chosen statements from the public debate and an interview with the director of the museum, Frederik Strand. We will answer the thesis statement based on museum theory, argumentation theory, and theory about collective memory. The project discusses whether the exhibition can be categorized as dark tourism and which factors effects a museums consideration when exhibiting controversial objects. The project concludes that the purpose of the exhibition was to contribute to the debate about evil. In addition, it is concluded that there was a general negative attitude in the public debate. Furthermore, it is concluded that the factors which effects the consideration of controversial exhibitions are the time from the case to the exhibition and the relatives of the victims. Generally, the project concludes that there are no concrete regulations regarding the above- mentioned factors and therefore it comes down to a subjective estimation case by case. Indholdsfortegnelse 1.INDLEDNING....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Motivation ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Problemfelt .............................................................................................................................................. -
Your Post Has Been Removed
Frederik Stjernfelt & Anne Mette Lauritzen YOUR POST HAS BEEN REMOVED Tech Giants and Freedom of Speech Your Post has been Removed Frederik Stjernfelt Anne Mette Lauritzen Your Post has been Removed Tech Giants and Freedom of Speech Frederik Stjernfelt Anne Mette Lauritzen Humanomics Center, Center for Information and Communication/AAU Bubble Studies Aalborg University University of Copenhagen Copenhagen København S, København SV, København, Denmark København, Denmark ISBN 978-3-030-25967-9 ISBN 978-3-030-25968-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25968-6 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permit- ted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. -
Dr. Belding H. Scribner
Laudatio: Dr. Belding H. Scribner elding Hibbard Scribner, MD, was the recipient of this solution up three stories. Scribner next attended the Univer- Byear’s Special Award for Lifetime Achievements in sity of California Berkeley, from 1938 to 1941, where he re- Hemodialysis. The award was presented during the General ceived a Bachelor of Arts degree. A microchemistry course Session of the 22nd Annual Dialysis Conference, in Tampa, at Berkeley turned out to be very helpful in his later develop- Florida, March 4, 2002 (Fig. 1). Dr. Scribner is the father of ment of bedside tests for serum electrolytes [1]. hemodialysis treatment for chronic renal failure. In 1941, Scribner entered Stanford University School of Dr. Scribner was born on January 18, 1921, in Chicago, Medicine in San Francisco. Before graduation, he completed Illinois. He spent his early youth in Chicago but, because of 1 year of internship at the San Francisco Hospital, and he allergies, he spent ragweed season in Wisconsin to avoid received his MD degree in 1945. His mentor in medical school asthma attacks. His ancestors on his mother’s side lived in was Thomas Addis, a Scotsman, who had studied in Belding, Michigan, a small town near Grand Rapids. His Edinburgh, Scotland, and Heidelberg, Germany. In 1911, mother’s maiden name was Belding; hence his first name, Dr. Addis was invited to Stanford University’s School of which Scribner never liked, preferring to be called “Scrib” Medicine in San Francisco, and in 1920 was appointed Pro- by his collaborators. Because of his asthma, he always thought fessor of Medicine. -
The European Court of Human Rights—A European Constitutional Court? by Jacob Mchangama*
The European Court of Human Rights—A European Constitutional Court? By Jacob Mchangama* egal discussions of constitutionalism will typically focus against the reemergence of totalitarianism.4 As noted in a on national developments and differences between document drafted by high-ranking UK civil servants engaged in various national constitutional systems. However the the drafting of the ECHR: “The original purpose of the Council Lfocus of my remarks will not be on national constitutions and of Europe Convention on Human Rights was to enable public constitutional courts—at least not directly—but rather on the attention to be drawn to any revival of totalitarian methods of idea of supranational or European constitutionalism. This is an government and to provide a forum in which the appropriate idea that holds great appeal to many lawyers and politicians. action could be discussed and decided.”5 The EU and the European Court of Justice (ECJ) is Judicial enforcement was to be the exception; in fact, it obviously central to any discussion of European constitutionalism, was assumed by drafters that the ECHR would not result in but my focus will be on the European Convention on Human any significant problems for the state parties. The UK Attorney- Rights (henceforth ECHR) and in particular on the European General Sir Hartley Shawcross stated: Court of Human Rights (henceforth the Court) set up to No other country engages, or need engage, in any over enforce this convention. nice and meticulous comparison of its own municipal There are those who believe that the ECHR has attained laws against its treaty obligations . -
Endnotes for Professor Nadine Strossen's Book HATE: Why We Should Resist It with Free Speech, Not Censorship
Endnotes for Professor Nadine Strossen’s book HATE: Why We Should Resist It with Free Speech, Not Censorship (Oxford University Press 2018) Endnotes last updated 4/27/18 by Kasey Kimball (lightly edited, mostly for format, 4/28/18 by Nadine Strossen) Note to readers from Nadine Strossen: I gratefully acknowledge the excellent work of my New York Law School student Research Assistants, who prepared these endnotes. Most of the work was done by Kasey Kimball, who did a superb job as my Managing RA. Other valued contributions were made by Dennis Futoryan, Nana Khachaturyan, Stefano Perez, and Rick Shea. I have gladly delegated the endnoting responsibility to them, consistent with the practice of law reviews. Any readers who might have questions or comments about any endnote or source, or who might seek additional information about any point in the book, is welcome to contact me via Email: [email protected]. I will endeavor to respond as promptly as feasible, consistent with a heavy travel and speaking schedule. KEY TERMS AND CONCEPTS PAGE PASSAGE CITATION xxiv “essence of self- Garrison v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 74, 75 (1964). government.” xxiv “entitled to special Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443, 444 (2011) (quoting Connick v. protection.” Myers, 461 U. S. 138, 145 (1983)). xxiv “the bedrock” of our Texas v. Johnson, 491 US 397, 414 (1989). freedom of speech. xxiv-xxv “information or Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC, 512 U.S. 622, 641 manipulate public (1994). debate.” xxv “suppression of ideas is R.A.V. v. St.