DOCSLIB.ORG

CURRICULUM VITAE DIANE LARSEN-FREEMAN University Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CURRICULUM VITAE DIANE LARSEN-FREEMAN University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan e-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION 1975 Ph.D. in Linguistics, University of Michigan 1973 M.A. in Linguistics, University of Michigan 1967 B.A. in Psychology, cum laude, State University of New York at Oswego AWARDS/HONORS 2019 Outstanding Teacher Award 2019, University Putra Malaysia 2019 Lifetime Achievement Award. State University of New York at Oswego. 2016 Selected for TESOL’s “50 at 50” (50 leaders who have made significant contributions to the profession within the past 50 years (on the occasion of the International TESOL Association’s 50th anniversary) 2011 Distinguished Scholarship and Service Award, American Association for Applied Linguistics 2010 Fulbright Distinguished Chair, University of Innsbruck, Austria 2009 Modern Language Association’s Kenneth W. Mildenberger book prize for Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics 2009 Honorary Doctoral Degree in Humanities, Hellenic American University, Athens 2000 Heinle & Heinle Lifetime Achievement Award for 2000 1999 Named as one of 30 American pioneers in the field of ESL in the 20th century by ESL Magazine (January/February 1999) 1997 Inducted into the Vermont Academy of Arts and Sciences 1991 Certificate of Appreciation (for six years of counsel as a member of the English Teaching Advisory Panel) Director, United States Information Agency 1989 Sustained Excellence Award (Highest Award) School for International Training/Experiment in International Living 1986 Distinguished Excellence Award School for International Training/Experiment in International Living 1975 Horace A. Rackham Graduate Fellowship University of Michigan RELEVANT PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2012-2019 Visiting Senior Fellow, Educational Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania (spring term) Diane Larsen-Freeman 2 2015-present Professor Emerita, SIT Graduate Institute, Brattleboro, Vermont 2013-present Professor Emerita, Education, Professor Emerita, Linguistics, Research Scientist Emerita, English Language Institute, University of Michigan 2008-2012 Research Scientist, English Language Institute, University of Michigan Faculty Associate, Center for the Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan 2003-2012 Professor of Linguistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 2002-2012 Professor of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 2002-2008 Director, English Language Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 2002-present Distinguished Senior Faculty Fellow, School for International Training 2001-2002 Interim Co-Dean, School for International Training 2000 Visiting Professor of Second Language Acquisition Department of Modern Languages Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 1987 - 2002 Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of Language Teacher Education, School for International Training, Brattleboro, Vermont 1978 - 1987 Assistant, then Associate Professor, MAT Program, School for International Training, Brattleboro, Vermont 1975 - 1978 Assistant Professor of English, University of California, Los Angeles 1973 - 1974 Teaching Fellow, English Language Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor ESL Instructor, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 1967 - 1969 EFL Teacher, Peace Corps Volunteer, Sabah, Malaysia PUBLICATIONS Books 2018 Second Language Development: Ever Expanding. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press. 2015 The Grammar Book: Form, Meaning and Use for English Language Teachers, Third Edition. (with M. Celce-Murcia). National Geographic Learning/Cengage Publishing Company. 2011 Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, Third Edition. (with M. Anderson). Oxford University Press. 2009 Language as a Complex Adaptive System. N. C. Ellis & D. Larsen-Freeman (Eds). Wiley- Blackwell. 2008 Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics (with L. Cameron). Oxford University Press. Diane Larsen-Freeman 3 2003 Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring. Heinle, Cengage Publishing Company. 2002 Olympic English. Series Director. Mc-Graw Hill Publishing Company. 2000 Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, Second Edition. Oxford University Press. Later translated into Chinese. 1999 The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course, Second Edition. (with M. Celce- Murcia). Heinle & Heinle Publishing Company. 1993, 1997, Grammar Dimensions: Form, Meaning, and Use. Series Director. Heinle/Cengage Publishing 2000, 2007 Company. 1991 An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. (with M. Long). Longman. Later translated into Japanese, Spanish. 1986 Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford University Press. Later translated into Arabic, Basque, and Chinese. 1983 The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course (with M. Celce-Murcia). Newbury House. 1980 Discourse Analysis in Second Language Research, Editor. Newbury House. Book Chapters and Journal Articles Submitted (with D. Reid Evans) Bifurcations, Fractals, and the Emergence of L2 Syntactic Structures in a Complex Dynamic System. Frontiers in Psychology. Submitted (with P. Hiver and A. H. Al-Hoorie) Toward a transdisciplinary integration of research purposes and methods for Complex Dynamic Systems Theory: Beyond the quantitative– qualitative divide. International Review of Applied Linguistics, Special Issue. Submitted Researching language classroom dynamics from a complex dynamic systems perspective. In Research Questions in Language Education and Applied Linguistics, edited by Hassan Mohebbi & Christine Coombe. Springer. Forthcoming Teaching and researching grammar skills: Theory and research-based practices. A chapter for the book Research-Driven Pedagogy: Implications of L2A Theory and Research for the Teaching of Language Skills, edited by N. Polat, T. Gregersen, & P. D. MacIntyre. New York: Routledge. Forthcoming Grammaring and the fascinating case of There. Task Project-type English Classes --- Development of TBLT in Japan. To be published by Taishukan-shoten. Forthcoming (with E. Todeva) A sociocognitive theory for plurilingualism: Complex dynamic systems theory. In E. Piccardo, A. Germain-Rutherford, & G. Lawrence (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of Plurilingual Language Education. 2020 Relational systems in interaction and interlocutor differences in second language development. In , L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-Theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and Their Individual Differences (pp. 191–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Diane Larsen-Freeman 4 2020 (with P. Hiver) Motivation: It is a relational system. In A. H. Al-Hoorie & P. D. MacIntyre (Eds.), Contemporary Language Motivation Theory: 60 Years Since Gardner and Lambert (1959) (pp. 285–303). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 2019 Thoughts on launching a new journal: A complex dynamic systems perspective. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 1, 67–82. 2019 On language learner agency: A complex dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 103 (Supplement 2019), 61–79. 2018 (with J. Blommaert, O. García, & G. Kress) Communicating beyond diversity: a bricolage of ideas. In A. Sherris & E. Adami (Eds.), Making Signs, Translanguaging, Ethnographies (pp. 9–29). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 2018 Resonances: Second language development and language planning and policy from a complexity theory perspective. In F. Hult, T. Kupisch, & M. Siiner (Eds.), Language Acquisition and Language Policy Planning (pp. 203−217). Springer. 2018 Task repetition or tasks iteration? It does make a difference. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Learning Language Through Task Repetition (pp. 311−329). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2018 Second language acquisition, WE, and language as a complex adaptive system (CAS). In P. De Costa & K. Bolton (Eds.), World Englishes, 37(1) (Special Issue), 80−92. doi: 10.1111/weng.12304 2018 (with H. Nguyen). Task-based language teaching and complexity theory. In M. Ahmadian & M. Del Pilar Garcia Mayo (Eds.), Recent Perspectives on Task-based Learning and Teaching. (pp. 167−193). De Gruyter Mouton. doi 10.1515/9781501503399-009 2018 Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language, acquisition. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 55−72. doi.org/10.1111/flan.12314 2018 Complexity and ELF. In J. Jenkins, W. Baker and M. Dewey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook on English as a Lingua Franca (pp. 51−60). Routledge. 2017 Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z.-H. Han (Eds.), Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 11−50). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins 2017 Just learning. Language Teaching: Surveys and Studies, 50(3), 425–437. doi:10.1017/S0261444817000106 2017 Shifting metaphors: From computer input to ecological affordances to adaptation. In Proceedings from the IATEFL 50th Anniversary Conference, Birmingham (pp.10-19). Kent: IATEFL. 2016 Classroom-oriented research from a complex systems perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 3−19. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.3.2 2016 Complexity and ELF: A matter of nonteleology. In M.-L. Pitzl and R. Osimk-Teasdale, (Eds.), English as a Lingua Franca: Perspectives and prospects. Contributions in Honour of Barbara Seidlhofer (pp. 139−146). De Gruyter Mouton. Diane Larsen-Freeman 5 2016 (an author in) The Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47. doi: 10.1111/modl.12301 2016 World language teaching: Thinking differently. (with D. J.Tedick). In D. Gitomer and C. Bell (Eds.), Handbook
Recommended publications
  • Second Language Acquisition: an Advanced Resource Book

    Second Language Acquisition: an Advanced Resource Book

    September 20062006 Volume 10, Number 2 Top Second language acquisition: An advanced resource book Kees deBot, Wander Lowie & Marjolijn Verspoor Author: (2006) Publisher: New York: Routledge Pages ISBN Price Pp. xvi + 0-41-533870-0 $29.95 U.S. 303 Introduction DeBot, Lowie, and Verspoor have produced a well-written textbook/resource that covers important areas of second language acquisition (SLA). Although the title has the word "advanced" in it, this should not frighten any reader with an interest in how languages are learned and with questions such as whether form-focused instruction is beneficial to the learner. This text can profitably be read as a second book in the field, perhaps after starting with Bill VanPatten's excellent slim text From input to output: A teacher's guide to second language acquisition (2002) or Lightbrown and Spada's How languages are learned (2006). Second language acquisition: An advanced resource book is divided into three sections. Unit A covers the field of SLA research in a manner similar to other textbooks. The chapters in this unit are as follows: A1) Defining the field A2) Dynamic aspects of SLA A3) Historical perspectives A4) The multilingual mind A5) The developing system A6) Learners' characteristics A7) The role of instruction. Unit B extends all of these topics by providing hallmark SLA articles along with annotations, commentary, and follow-up and reflection questions. Unit C further TESL-EJ 10.2, Sept. 2006 deBot, Lowie & Verspoor / Kozel 1 explores the same topics and in the process encourages the reader to think about, reflect upon, and do their own research on such topics in SLA.
  • Introduction: Reconciling Approaches to Intra-Individual Variation in Psycholinguistics and Variationist Sociolinguistics

    Introduction: Reconciling Approaches to Intra-Individual Variation in Psycholinguistics and Variationist Sociolinguistics

    Linguistics Vanguard 2021; 7(s2): 20200027 Lars Bülow* and Simone E. Pfenninger Introduction: Reconciling approaches to intra-individual variation in psycholinguistics and variationist sociolinguistics https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0027 Abstract: The overall theme of this special issue is intra-individual variation, that is, the observable variation within individuals’ behaviour, which plays an important role in the humanities area as well as in the social sciences. While various fields have recognised the complexity and dynamism of human thought and behav- iour, intra-individual variation has received less attention in regard to language acquisition, use and change. Linguistic research so far lacks both empirical and theoretical work that provides detailed information on the occurrence of intra-individual variation, the reasons for its occurrence and its consequences for language development as well as for language variation and change. The current issue brings together two sub- disciplines – psycholinguistics and variationist sociolinguistics – in juxtaposing systematic and non- systematic intra-individual variation, thereby attempting to build a cross-fertilisation relationship between two disciplines that have had surprisingly little connection so far. In so doing, we address critical stock-taking, meaningful theorizing and methodological innovation. Keywords: psycholinguistics, variationist sociolinguistics, intra-individual variation, intra-speaker variation, SLA, language variation and change, language development 1 Intra-individual variation in psycholinguistics and variationist sociolinguistics The overall theme of this special issue is intra-individual variation, that is, the observable variation within individuals’ behaviour, which plays an important role in the humanities area as well as in the social sciences. While various fields have acknowledged the complexity and dynamism of human behaviour, intra-individual variation has received less attention in regard to language use.
  • Downloaded for Free

    Downloaded for Free

    Salem State University From the SelectedWorks of Sovicheth Boun March 24, 2014 A Critical Examination Of Language Ideologies And Identities Of Cambodian Foreign-Trained University Lecturers Of English Sovicheth Boun Available at: https://works.bepress.com/sovicheth-boun/2/ Table of Contents General Conference Information ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3-­‐13 Welcome Messages from the President and the Conference Chair ........................................................................................................................ 3 Conference Program Committee .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Registration Information, Exhibit Hall Coffee Hours, Breaks, Internet Access, Conference Evaluation ................................................ 4 Strand Coordinators and Abstract Readers .................................................................................................................................................................. 5-­‐6 Student Volunteers, Individual Sessions and Roundtable Sessions Instructions ............................................................................................ 7 Conference Sponsors .............................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Usage Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning University of Jyväskylä, Finland, June 17–19, 2019

    Usage Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning University of Jyväskylä, Finland, June 17–19, 2019

    The 4th international conference Thinking, doing, learning: Usage based perspectives on second language learning University of Jyväskylä, Finland, June 17–19, 2019 Abstract Book Table of Contents Monday, June 17th 2019 Plenary Tim Greer The ecology of explaining................................... 6 Papers Yumi Matsumoto ”Material actions” in ESL classroom interactions: How students use materials and spaces for negotiating interactional power with teachers.......................... 7 Jirajittra Higgins A development of teaching modules to enhance students’ interactional competence in Thai university EFL classroom....................................... 8 Yuan-Yuan Meng Complex system phenomena in dyadic communication: A case study........ 9 Annekatrin Kaivapalu, Maisa Martin Complexity, accuracy, fluency: empirical attempts of definition 10 Feng-Ming Chi Creating dialogic conversations via Author’s Chair for EFL learners . 11 Tamás Péter Szabó Developing language aware pedagogy in the transition phase between kindergarten and school education: insights from the research of metalanguage .................... 12 Beatriz López-Medina, José Luis Estrada-Chichón Developing plurilingual competence in CLIL set- tings: a case study in Latvian secondary education............................. 13 Taina Tammelin-Laine Digital decade and teaching L2 Finnish literacy skills to non-literate immigrants 14 Keiko Imura Emergence of utterance schemas in young learners’ foreign language development: a longitudinal study of Japanese learners of English............................
  • Challenging Learners in Their Individual Zone of Proximal Development Using Pedagogic Developmental Benchmarks of Syntactic Complexity

    Challenging Learners in Their Individual Zone of Proximal Development Using Pedagogic Developmental Benchmarks of Syntactic Complexity

    Challenging Learners in Their Individual Zone of Proximal Development Using Pedagogic Developmental Benchmarks of Syntactic Complexity Xiaobin Chen and Detmar Meurers LEAD Graduate School and Research Network Department of Linguistics Eberhard Karls Universitat¨ Tubingen,¨ Germany {xiaobin.chen,detmar.meurers}@uni-tuebingen.de Abstract and identify reading material individually chal- lenging learners, essentially instantiating the next This paper introduces an Intelligent Com- stage of acquisition as captured by Krashen’s con- puter Assisted Language Learning system cept of i+1 (Krashen, 1981) or relatedly, but em- designed to provide reading input for lan- phasizing the social perspective, Vygotsky’s Zone guage learners based on the syntactic com- of Proximal Development (ZPD; Vygotsky, 1976). plexity of their language production. The In terms of structure of the paper, we first locate system analyzes the linguistic complexity our approach in terms of the Complexity, Accu- of texts produced by the user and of texts racy, and Fluency (CAF) framework in SLA re- in a pedagogic target language corpus to search. Then we review approaches adopted by identify texts that are well-suited to foster earlier studies in developmental complexity re- acquisition. These texts provide develop- search, including problems they pose for a peda- mental benchmarks offering an individu- gogical approach aimed at offering developmental ally tailored language challenge, making benchmarks. We propose and justify a solution, ideas such as Krashen’s i+1 or Vygotsky’s before presenting the architecture and functional- Zone of Proximal Development concrete ity of the SyB system. and empirically explorable in terms of a broad range of complexity measures in all 2 Development of Syntactic Complexity dimensions of linguistic modeling.
  • Audrey Rousse Malpat and Marjolijn Verspoor

    Audrey Rousse Malpat and Marjolijn Verspoor

    3.2. Case Study 2. Accelerative Integrated Method of foreign language teaching in Canada and the Netherlands Case study authors: Audrey Rousse Malpat and Marjolijn Verspoor Dr. Audrey Rousse-Malpat, assistant professor of Language Learning at the University of Groningen, the Netherlands, holds a PhD in Applied Linguistics (University of Groningen). Her PhD project focused on the effectiveness of different types of instruction (implicit vs. explicit) on the development of oral and written skills for L2 French. She is now working on several projects dealing with the implementation of innovative language curricula in universities, vocational education studies and junior high school in the Netherlands and in Germany. She specialises in L2 acquisition in poor-input environment settings and in dynamic usage-based inspired pedagogy. She is also the co-owner of Projectfrans.nl, a platform aimed at informing, training and supporting foreign language high school teachers in changing their practices according to a dynamic usage-based view of language learning. Marjolijn Verspoor is Professor of English Language and English as a Second Language at the University of Groningen, the Netherlands, and at the University of Pannonia, Hungary. Her main research interests are second language development from a dynamic usage-based perspective, and instructional approaches in foreign language teaching. Description of the teaching method and its context The accelerated integrated method (AIM), devised by Maxwell (2001), is intended to teach a foreign language38 (also referred in this case study as ‘L2’ or ‘target language’) authentically and playfully through scaffolding techniques, which use story-telling, gestures, active collaboration and repetition. So far it has been used to teach French, English, Spanish and Mandarin to young beginners from around 7 to 15 years old.
  • Lourdes Ortega Curriculum Vitae

    Lourdes Ortega Curriculum Vitae

    Lourdes Ortega Curriculum Vitae Updated: August 2019 Department of Linguistics 1437 37th Street NW Box 571051 Poulton Hall 250 Georgetown University Washington, DC 20057-1051 Department of Linguistics Fax (202) 687-6174 E-mail: [email protected] Webpage: https://sites.google.com/a/georgetown.edu/lourdes-ortega/ EDUCATION 2000 Ph.D. in Second Language Acquisition. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Department of Second Language Studies, USA. 1995 M.A. in English as a Second Language. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Department of Second Language Studies, USA. 1993 R.S.A. Dip., Diploma for Overseas Teachers of English. Cambridge University/UCLES, UK. 1987 Licenciatura in Spanish Philology. University of Cádiz, Spain. EMPLOYMENT since 2012 Professor, Georgetown University, Department of Linguistics. 2004-2012 Professor (2010-2012), Associate Professor (2006-2010), Assistant Professor (2004-2006), University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Department of Second Language Studies. 2002-2004 Assistant Professor (tenure-track), Northern Arizona University, Department of English. 2000-2002 Assistant Professor (tenure-track). Georgia State University, Department of Applied Linguistics and ESL. 1999-2000 Visiting Instructor of Applied Linguistics, Georgetown University, Department of Linguistics. 1994-1998 Research and Teaching Graduate Assistant, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, College of Languages, Linguistics, and Literature. 1987-1993 Instructor of Spanish, Instituto Cervantes of Athens, Greece. FELLOWSHIPS 2018: Distinguished Visiting Fellow at the Graduate Center, City University of New York, Advanced Research Collaborative (ARC). August through December, 2018. 2010: External Senior Research Fellow at the Freiburg Institute of Advanced Studies (FRIAS), University of Freiburg. One-semester residential fellowship at FRIAS to carry out project titled Pathways to multicompetence: Applying usage-based and constructionist theories to the study of interlanguage development.
  • Recherches En Didactique Des Langues Et Des Cultures Les Cahiers De L'acedle

    Recherches En Didactique Des Langues Et Des Cultures Les Cahiers De L'acedle

    Recherches en didactique des langues et des cultures Les cahiers de l'Acedle 14-1 | 2017 Notions en questions - Emergentisme Linguistic complexity in second language development: variability and variation at advanced stages Marjolijn Verspoor, Wander Lowie, Hui Ping Chan et Louisa Vahtrick Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rdlc/1450 DOI : 10.4000/rdlc.1450 ISSN : 1958-5772 Éditeur ACEDLE Référence électronique Marjolijn Verspoor, Wander Lowie, Hui Ping Chan et Louisa Vahtrick, « Linguistic complexity in second language development: variability and variation at advanced stages », Recherches en didactique des langues et des cultures [En ligne], 14-1 | 2017, mis en ligne le 30 janvier 2017, consulté le 19 avril 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rdlc/1450 ; DOI : 10.4000/rdlc.1450 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 19 avril 2019. Recherches en didactique des langues et des cultures is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License Linguistic complexity in second language development: variability and variati... 1 Linguistic complexity in second language development: variability and variation at advanced stages Marjolijn Verspoor, Wander Lowie, Hui Ping Chan et Louisa Vahtrick Introduction 1 The current special issue concerns linguistic complexity in second language development. Following Bulté and Housen (2014), we will define our basic construct as follows: linguistic complexity is a quantitative property of language units. Basically, the greater the number of components a construction has and the more levels of embedding it contains, the more complex it is. Linguistic complexity can be regarded as a valid descriptor of L2 performance, as an indicator of proficiency, and as an index of language development and progress.
  • Challenging Learners in Their Individual Zone of Proximal Development Using Pedagogic Developmental Benchmarks of Syntactic Complexity

    Challenging Learners in Their Individual Zone of Proximal Development Using Pedagogic Developmental Benchmarks of Syntactic Complexity

    Challenging Learners in Their Individual Zone of Proximal Development Using Pedagogic Developmental Benchmarks of Syntactic Complexity Xiaobin Chen and Detmar Meurers LEAD Graduate School and Research Network Department of Linguistics Eberhard Karls Universitat¨ Tubingen,¨ Germany fxiaobin.chen,[email protected] Abstract and identify reading material individually chal- lenging learners, essentially instantiating the next This paper introduces an Intelligent Com- stage of acquisition as captured by Krashen’s con- puter Assisted Language Learning system cept of i+1 (Krashen, 1981) or relatedly, but em- designed to provide reading input for lan- phasizing the social perspective, Vygotsky’s Zone guage learners based on the syntactic com- of Proximal Development (ZPD; Vygotsky, 1976). plexity of their language production. The In terms of structure of the paper, we first locate system analyzes the linguistic complexity our approach in terms of the Complexity, Accu- of texts produced by the user and of texts racy, and Fluency (CAF) framework in SLA re- in a pedagogic target language corpus to search. Then we review approaches adopted by identify texts that are well-suited to foster earlier studies in developmental complexity re- acquisition. These texts provide develop- search, including problems they pose for a peda- mental benchmarks offering an individu- gogical approach aimed at offering developmental ally tailored language challenge, making benchmarks. We propose and justify a solution, ideas such as Krashen’s i+1 or Vygotsky’s before presenting the architecture and functional- Zone of Proximal Development concrete ity of the SyB system. and empirically explorable in terms of a broad range of complexity measures in all 2 Development of Syntactic Complexity dimensions of linguistic modeling.
  • About the INTER and the INTRA in Age-Related Research: Evidence

    About the INTER and the INTRA in Age-Related Research: Evidence

    Linguistics Vanguard 2021; 7(s2): 20200028 Simone E. Pfenninger* About the INTER and the INTRA in age-related research: Evidence from a longitudinal CLIL study with dense time serial measurements https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0028 Abstract: This is the first longitudinal study to explore the best time and timing for regular versus bilingual language exposure in (pre)primary programs, using multiple measures over time so as to focus on fluctuations, trends and interactions in individual data as well as intra-individual variation over time. We studied children who had received 50/50 bilingual instruction in German and English (so-called ‘partial CLIL’ programs) as well as children in ‘minimal CLIL’ programs with almost uniquely monolingual German instruction (90% German, 10% English). Results show that, like other individual differences (ID) variables, the age factor behaves like a dynamic entity that changes over time and affects L2 literacy development differentially at different times. Furthermore, while an early age of first bilingual language exposure has no effect on the L2 development for the children in the minimal CLIL program, early-AO bilinguals in the partial CLIL program (age of first exposure 5) outperform the older-AO bilingual group (age of first exposure 7 and 9) in terms of accuracy and (syntactic and morphological) complexity but not in terms of lexical richness and fluency. Keywords: SLA, age factor, CLIL, complex dynamic systems, young learners, individual differences 1 Introduction The prevailing approach to SLA up to the beginning of this century was to focus on product-based explanations of SLA (Lowie and Verspoor 2015), which is reflected, among other things, in the assumption that the variation in interlanguage is either rather systematic or completely random and can be relegated to “(white) noise”.In particular, it was non-systematic, free intra-individual variation that had often been too readily dismissed as noise or measurement error or attributed to “outliers”.
  • Finding the Key to Successful L2 Learning in Groups and Individuals

    Finding the Key to Successful L2 Learning in Groups and Individuals

    Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching Department of English Studies, Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts, Adam Mickiewicz University, Kalisz SSLLT 7 (1). 2017. 127-148 doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.1.7 http://www.ssllt.amu.edu.pl Finding the key to successful L2 learning in groups and individuals Wander Lowie University of Groningen, The Netherlands [email protected] Marijn van Dijk University of Groningen, The Netherlands [email protected] Huiping Chan University of Groningen, The Netherlands [email protected] Marjolijn Verspoor University of Groningen, The Netherlands [email protected] Abstract A large body studies into individual differences in second language learning has shown that success in second language learning is strongly affected by a set of relevant learner characteristics ranging from the age of onset to moti- vation, aptitude, and personality. Most studies have concentrated on a limited number of learner characteristics and have argued for the relative importance of some of these factors. Clearly, some learners are more successful than oth- ers, and it is tempting to try to find the factor or combination of factors that can crack the code to success. However, isolating one or several global indi- vidual characteristics can only give a partial explanation of success in second language learning. The limitation of this approach is that it only reflects on rather general personality characteristics of learners at one point in time, 127 Wander Lowie, Marijn van Dijk, Huiping Chan, Marjolijn Verspoor while both language development and the factors affecting it are instances of complex dynamic processes that develop over time.
  • Marjolijn Verspoor, Kees De Bot, and Wander Lowie University of Groningen Departments of English and Applied Linguistics

    Marjolijn Verspoor, Kees De Bot, and Wander Lowie University of Groningen Departments of English and Applied Linguistics

    Published as: Verspoor, M.H., K. de Bot & W.M. Lowie, “Dynamic systems theory and variation: a case study in L2 writing.” In H. Aertsen, M. Hannay & R. Lyall, Words in their places: a Festschrift for J. Lachlan Mackenzie . Amsterdam: VU, 2004. pp. 407-421. MANUSCRIPT 1 Marjolijn Verspoor, Kees de Bot, and Wander Lowie University of Groningen Departments of English and Applied Linguistics Dynamic Systems Theory and Variation: a case study in L2 writing 1 Introduction As colleagues in another English Department, we have worked with Lachlan Mackenzie’s publications on a day-to-day basis in our classes: Principles and pitfalls of English grammar is used in our practical English grammar classes and Effective writing in English: a resource guide is often consulted when we run into persistent writing problems. In this paper we would like to address these common points of interest from a radically different perspective, namely Dynamic Systems Theory (DST), and rather than concentrating on how grammar and writing can be taught, we will examine if and how the writing and grammar of two beginning students develops without any specific teaching. We intend to raise one particular issue that presents a link between DST and SLA: variation. Our aim is to stimulate discussion on how variation should be viewed and interpreted, but we want to stress here that DST and its views on variation is not a theory on SLA in itself. It is merely a framework that offers a different perspective on language as a system. The structure of this contribution is as follows.