DOCSLIB.ORG

Impacts on Financial Regulation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impacts on Financial Regulation WHAT IF BIDEN WINS? Impacts on Financial Regulation Douglas J. Elliott October 27, 2020 What If Biden Wins? November’s election will substantially affect financial regulation. In this paper, I examine the likely impacts if former Vice President Joe Biden wins the election. © Oliver Wyman 2 What If Biden Wins? THE BIG PICTURE Financial regulation is unlikely to be one of the top priorities for a Joe Biden presidency Covid-19, the economic recovery, healthcare, social justice, the climate transition, and troubled foreign relations will already more than occupy the new President’s attention. Major legislation in this area is therefore improbable Big legislation almost always takes a major push from the Administration, which appears unlikely unless a large problem develops that creates a bipartisan consensus for action. Legislation will be even less likely if the Democrats fail to get a majority in the Senate or have only a vote or two to spare in that body. (Fivethirtyeight.com’s average forecast currently is for 51 Democrats and 49 Republicans in the Senate, with a reasonable probability of being as much as three seats higher or lower for the Democrats.) But, regulators can do a great deal without new legislation Capital and liquidity requirements, resolution and recovery planning, risk management procedures, disclosure requirements, and many other areas offer regulators and supervisors great leeway to mandate changes. Who is chosen for the key positions will matter Any Democratic appointees will share certain priorities, but there will be important differences on other potential initiatives and in how the key priorities are executed. The shape of the new team is unclear at this point. Most changes will take time New regulators will not be in place for some time and then need to settle in; have their staffs initiate the analysis required to back up rule changes; put out proposed rules and receive comments; make any refinements; issue the final rules; and then wait for them to take effect. © Oliver Wyman 3 What If Biden Wins? The Biden team has not issued detailed financial regulatory proposals, but we do have a sense of their priorities These are likely to include: • Tougher regulation of the largest banks • Climate transition risk management and disclosure requirements • Structural changes to retail banking through a greater government role • A social justice package • Higher taxes for large banks and Wall Street • Implementation of Basel IV and potential further changes to capital requirements Biden appointees will also influence global regulatory initiatives The US has a strong influence on regulatory standards that come out of the Basel-based bodies. Federal Reserve, Vice Chair for Supervision, Randal K. Quarles, for example, is the current Chair of the Financial Stability Board (FSB). © Oliver Wyman 4 What If Biden Wins? THE REST OF THE STORY Financial regulation is unlikely to be one of the top priorities for a Joe Biden presidency Realistically, a president can only successfully push a few major initiatives in their first two years, although they always start out believing they can do more at one time. The new president would already face a daunting set of challenges with Covid-19, the economic recovery, healthcare, social justice, the climate transition, and troubled foreign relations. Barring a major financial crisis, financial regulation cannot compete with these issues for the Administration’s attention. Major legislation in this area is therefore improbable Big legislation almost always takes a major push from the Administration, which appears unlikely unless a large problem develops that creates a bipartisan consensus for action. Legislation will be even less likely if Democrats fail to get a majority in the Senate or have only a vote or two to spare in that body. Action is made even less likely by the Senate’s “filibuster” rule, which allows a minority of senators to block most legislation unless there are 60 votes to override the filibuster. Most Senate Democrats favor the elimination of the filibuster rule if they take control, however there is a good chance that one or more Democratic senators would refuse to abolish the rule outright. There might still be a weakening of the rule, which would leave it as an obstacle, but of reduced power. But, regulators can do a great deal without new legislation Congress virtually always grants financial regulators and supervisors considerable freedom to write specific rules and guidance to implement any legislation it passes, in recognition of the complexity of the issues in this area. Capital and liquidity requirements, resolution and recovery planning, risk management procedures, disclosure requirements, and many other areas provide regulators and supervisors great leeway to force changes. Some new priorities, such as dealing with the role of finance in the climate transition, could largely be tackled without new laws. Disclosures, risk management requirements, and potentially capital requirements, could all be used to focus banks on the climate transition. Who is chosen for the key positions will matter Any Democratic appointees will share certain priorities, but there will be important differences on other potential initiatives and in how the key priorities are executed. I receive a wide range of answers when I query my best sources on who Biden might appoint. All agree that it is not clear and that no name has even a 50 percent chance of being right. That said, four names come up the most in my discussions. © Oliver Wyman 5 What If Biden Wins? Lael Brainard, currently on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, seems highly likely to move to a more important position over time. She appears to be in contention for Treasury Secretary or Fed Chair. Fed Vice Chair for Supervision could easily be a consolation prize if she is not chosen for one of those two positions. Her views are in the broad mainstream of thinking at the Fed, but substantially more closely aligned with those of former Fed Governor Daniel K. Tarullo than of the current team. She has dissented on most of the changes to capital requirements over the last couple of years, stating that they were too lenient to the largest banks, and had supported moving to a positive counter-cyclical capital buffer prior to the pandemic. Roger Ferguson, current President and CEO of TIAA-CREF and former Vice Chair of the Fed, has been raised by several of my sources as a potential Treasury Secretary or Fed Chair. There would likely be some resistance from progressives to naming a CEO to this position, but TIAA-CREF can be viewed as primarily a pension fund, which might alleviate these concerns. Ferguson’s current views on financial regulation are not clear, so he would be something of a wild card. Elizabeth Warren, senator from Massachusetts and former contender for the Democratic presidential nomination, is frequently raised as a possibility for Treasury Secretary. However, I agree with most of my sources that this is not a likely appointment, although it could happen. First, the Republican Governor of Massachusetts would appoint her temporary replacement to the Senate, which could mean six months or more with one fewer Democratic vote in the Senate. That alone could kill this, unless the Democrats win really big and have a majority of three or four seats. (They currently are in the minority by three seats. Only one-third of the Senate seats are up each election, making it difficult to secure a net gain of six or seven seats.) Second, my guess is that Warren would rather stay out of the Administration in order to keep her options more open for a potential presidential run again in 2024. Cabinet secretaries have to toe the Administration’s line, which could force her to concur with political positions that might hurt her later. Third, her name is also being floated for US Attorney General, which might suit both Biden and her better, were she to take a cabinet post. Warren’s appointment would be viewed with apprehension by at least the largest of the banks, given her advocacy of a “21st-Century, modern Glass-Steagall”, higher capital requirements, a tougher version of the Volcker Rule, etc. Jerome “Jay” Powell could conceivably be reappointed as Fed Chair when his term expires in February 2022, although the probability is that a Biden presidency would choose a Democrat to replace him. In his favor, Powell is generally viewed favorably by members of Congress of both parties and by the markets. The monetary policy he has overseen is popular and fits with approaches favored by Democratic economists. Reappointing him would provide more stability, which markets generally prefer and would allow Biden to demonstrate bipartisanship. He would also be likely confirmed even if the Republicans still controlled the Senate. Working against him are two big factors. First, presidents would rather appoint their own person, both for policy reasons and because it gives them an opportunity to reward one of their own with a highly coveted position. Second, there is much more focus on the Fed’s regulatory role than was true when Paul Volcker, Alan Greenspan, and Ben Bernanke were each reappointed by presidents of the opposite party to theirs. There will be very strong pressure from progressives for someone viewed as tougher on bank regulation to take over. © Oliver Wyman 6 What If Biden Wins? Most changes will take time New regulators will not be in place for some time and then need to settle in; have their staffs initiate the analysis required to backup rule changes; put out proposed rules and receive comments; make any refinements; issue the final rules; and then wait for them to take effect. As noted, the Fed Chair role turns over in February 2022.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basel III: Post-Crisis Reforms
    Basel III: Post-Crisis Reforms Implementation Timeline Focus: Capital Definitions, Capital Focus: Capital Requirements Buffers and Liquidity Requirements Basel lll 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 1 January 2022 Full implementation of: 1. Revised standardised approach for credit risk; 2. Revised IRB framework; 1 January 3. Revised CVA framework; 1 January 1 January 1 January 1 January 1 January 2018 4. Revised operational risk framework; 2027 5. Revised market risk framework (Fundamental Review of 2023 2024 2025 2026 Full implementation of Leverage Trading Book); and Output 6. Leverage Ratio (revised exposure definition). Output Output Output Output Ratio (Existing exposure floor: Transitional implementation floor: 55% floor: 60% floor: 65% floor: 70% definition) Output floor: 50% 72.5% Capital Ratios 0% - 2.5% 0% - 2.5% Countercyclical 0% - 2.5% 2.5% Buffer 2.5% Conservation 2.5% Buffer 8% 6% Minimum Capital 4.5% Requirement Core Equity Tier 1 (CET 1) Tier 1 (T1) Total Capital (Tier 1 + Tier 2) Standardised Approach for Credit Risk New Categories of Revisions to the Existing Standardised Approach Exposures • Exposures to Banks • Exposure to Covered Bonds Bank exposures will be risk-weighted based on either the External Credit Risk Assessment Approach (ECRA) or Standardised Credit Risk Rated covered bonds will be risk Assessment Approach (SCRA). Banks are to apply ECRA where regulators do allow the use of external ratings for regulatory purposes and weighted based on issue SCRA for regulators that don’t. specific rating while risk weights for unrated covered bonds will • Exposures to Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) be inferred from the issuer’s For exposures that do not fulfil the eligibility criteria, risk weights are to be determined by either SCRA or ECRA.
    [Show full text]
  • Basel IV Quantitative Impact Study on Cyprus Banks September 2020 1 Basel IV | Quantitative Impact Study on Cyprus Banks
    Basel IV | Quantitative Impact Study on Cyprus Banks Basel IV Quantitative Impact Study on Cyprus Banks September 2020 1 Basel IV | Quantitative Impact Study on Cyprus Banks The aim of this paper is to provide an (especially SME) and retail customers, Summary overview of the changes in Credit Risk as well as project financing (as part of quantification under Basel IV, focusing on specialised lending). Banking-book credit risk requirements both Our most recent publication from a Standardised and Internal Ratings Analysing and understanding how the examines the impact of Basel IV Based (IRB) approach. reforms will affect the various portfolios of on Cyprus Banks. a bank and how these drive the decrease Our paper also provides guidance on the in required capital, is of paramount In particular, this article steps required to begin understanding importance to Cyprus Banks to ensure focuses on the updated Credit the impact of the reforms on required required capital is allocated appropriately Risk assessment framework. data, changes in processes, modelling and to each of the components of a bank. governance. Banks are therefore challenged to start Our analysis indicates that collecting new data as required by the Cyprus Banks are expected to For our analysis, we have performed reforms. a Quantitative Impact Study (QIS) to have a reduction in capital understand the impact across the different Separate to the Standardised approach requirements as a consequence portfolios of a typical Cyprus Bank, (SA) reforms, our paper considers the Basel of the revised risk-weights shedding a light on which components of IV changes under the IRB approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Basel IV and Proportionality Initiatives
    Basel IV and proportionality initiatives Upcoming changes to the Canadian capital and liquidity framework Introduction Enhancements to risk-based capital requirements and minimum Q1-2020. Attention is now focused on the implementation of liquidity and funding standards for Deposit-Taking Institutions final Basel III reforms, informally referred to as ‘Basel IV’, which (DTIs) are two foundational aspects of post-financial crisis introduces extensive revisions to the calculation of Risk-Weighted reforms introduced by Basel III. In Canada, initial Basel III reforms Assets (RWA) for Pillar 1 risks. OSFI’s proposed policy direction dedicated to raising the quality and quantity of capital have and implementation timelines for Basel IV are included in OSFI’s already been implemented. The domestic implementation of July 2018 discussion paper, Implementation of the final Basel III Basel III liquidity and funding standards will be complete when reforms in Canada. DTIs begin reporting the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) in Figure 1: Summary of basel capital, leverage and liquidity requirements Focus of CET1 Basel III: ratio Raising the Capital LCR, NSFR Leverage ratio quality and quantity of capital Focus of RWA Basel IV: Revising how risks are calculated Risk positions SA for Securitisation Operational SA for IRB for Market risk CVA risk Output measuring risk credit risk credit risk (FRTB) floor counterparty credit risk Source: Workshop Basel IV, KPMG International, 2018. While the Basel framework was originally designed to apply to which obligates DTIs to achieve compliance with updated large, internationally-active banks, domestic regulators including standards in short order. OSFI have applied Basel standards to a wider set of banks In this paper, we provide a consolidated overview of the for pragmatic reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Basel Iv Compliance
    REPRINT risk & R&Ccompliance DATA PRIVACY INBASEL EUROPE IV COMPLIANCE REPRINTED FROM: RISK & COMPLIANCE MAGAZINE JAN-MARJAN-MAR 20202014 ISSUE rriskisk && && compliance compliance������������ JAN-MAR 2014 RC ��������������������������������� RC www.riskandcompliancemagazine.com Inside this issue: FEATURE The evolving role of the chief risk officer EXPERT FORUM Managing your company’s regulatory exposure ������������������ HOT TOPIC ������� Data privacy in Europe ������������������������� ���������������������� ������������ ���������������������� �������������������� ��������� ������������������������� ����������������������������� www.riskandcompliancemagazine.com VVisitisit the website to request a free copy of the full e-magazine To learn more about how SAS can help drive business evolution with intelligent Published by Financier Worldwide Ltd [email protected]@financierworldwide.com risk analytics, please visit sas.com/risk. © 20202014 Financier Worldwide Ltd. All rights reserved. risk & R&Ccompliance www.riskandcompliancemagazine.com 2 RISK & COMPLIANCE Jan-Mar 2020 www.riskandcompliancemagazine.com MINI-ROUNDTABLE MINI-ROUNDTABLE BASEL IV COMPLIANCE www.riskandcompliancemagazine.com RISK & COMPLIANCE Jan-Mar 2020 3 BASEL IV COMPLIANCE MINI-ROUNDTABLE PANEL EXPERTS Luís Barbosa Partner PwC T: +351 213 599 151 E: luis.fi[email protected] Luís Barbosa is currently leading PwC’s European network in the area of risk modelling & risk-weighted assets (RWA) and is responsible for the credit risk
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Diversity in Bank Credit Portfolios Basel Iv
    BASEL IV REQUIRESIN BANKTHE SERIOUS CREDIT VALUE PORTFOLIOSOFU.S. DIVERSITY REVIEW REPRINTS OF THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE CLEARING HOUSE Q1 2018, VOLUME 6, ISSUE 1 AND DESIGNING A MORE EFFECTIVE AML/CFT SYSTEM MENDING THE RISK-BASED APPROACH HAS THE U.K. FOUND THE ANSWER TO AML INFORMATION SHARING? TECH’S ROLE IN IMPROVING THE AML SYSTEM AML REFORM: A SAFE HARBOR PROPOSAL THE VALUE OF DIVERSITY 2 BANKING PERSPECTIVES IN BANK CREDIT QUARTER 1 2018 PORTFOLIOS DIVERSITY CAN BE A POSITIVE FORCE FOR A HEALTHY CREDIT MARKET AND A SYSTEMICALLY HEALTHY FINANCIAL SYSTEM. BY DAVID CARRUTHERS AND MARK FAULKNER CREDIT BENCHMARK DIVERSITY – IN NATURE AND IN HUMAN ACTIVITY – is usually seen as a force for good. This view has strong support among credit market participants, especially the banks that mobilize and deploy capital; they believe that there are economic and systemic benefits resulting from banks taking PORTFOLIOS different views of risk. However, financial regulators are concerned about the role of this diversity in driving excess variability in risk-weighted assets. Regulators have argued for, and continue to impose, regulatory floors and ceilings to limit that variability; however, in some cases, these constraints could limit the scope for credit opinion diversity. Despite the differences in opinion, we find it encouraging that this important topic is now the subject of a constructive debate between the participants in the market and those who regulate it. D BANKING PERSPECTIVES QUARTER 1 2018 3 The Value of Diversity in Bank Credit Portfolios A broad and deep credit market is an essential element than 90% of the bank obligors are unrated by the major of a broad, deep, and robust economy, mobilizing idle nationally recognized statistical rating organizations.1 capital and facilitating maturity transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • European Financial Congress1 in Relation to the Financial Stability Board’S Call for Public Feedback on the Effects of the Too-Big-To-Fail (TBTF) Reforms for Banks2
    Answers of the European Financial Congress1 in relation to the Financial Stability Board’s call for public feedback on the effects of the too-big-to-fail (TBTF) reforms for banks2 Methodology for preparing the answers The answers were prepared in the following stages: Stage 1 A group of experts from the Polish financial sector were invited to participate in the survey. They were sent the FSB’s consultation questions. The experts were guaranteed anonymity. Stage 2 The European Financial Congress received responses from experts representing: commercial banks, regulatory bodies, consulting firms and the academia. Stage 3 The survey project coordinators from the European Financial Congress prepared a draft synthesis of opinions submitted by the experts. The draft synthesis was sent to the experts participating in the survey with the request to mark the passages that should be modified in the final position and to propose modifications and additions as well as marking the passages they did not agree with. Stage 4 On the basis of the responses received, the final version of the European Financial Congress’ answers was prepared. 1 European Financial Congress (EFC – www.efcongress.com). The EFC is a think tank whose purpose is to promote debate on how to ensure the financial security and sustainable development of the European Union and Poland. 2 https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/R230519.pdf https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/P230519.pdf Answers of the European Financial Congress 1. To what extent are TBTF reforms achieving their
    [Show full text]
  • Basel 4 – the Effect on Swiss Banks How to Act Adequately March 2020 Brochure / Report Title Goes Here | Section Title Goes Here
    Basel 4 – the effect on Swiss Banks How to act adequately March 2020 Brochure / report title goes here | Section title goes here 02 Basel 4 – the effect on Swiss Banks |How to act adequately Summary The aim of this paper is to (LTV) metric is needed for both This article examines the impact understand the drivers of the RWA standardized and AIRB banks. of the Basel 4 post-crisis reforms impacts across the different Furthermore, proper documentation (published in December 2017) portfolios of a typical Swiss bank, on this portfolio is necessary for for a typical Swiss retail bank. and hence shed light on which components of the bank will be appropriate allocation of capital. In particular, this article will most affected. This paper further Other portfolios that require focus on the updated credit risk gives guidance on first steps to take further attention are: exposures to framework, as well as the impact to start understanding the impact corporates (especially SME), project of the newly introduced output of the reforms on required data, financing (as part of specialised lending) and retail exposures to floor for banks using internal changes in processes, changes SME. For certain portfolios, the risk models. Our assessment indicates in modelling and the required governance, and how Swiss banks weights used in the standardised that Swiss banks with internal could commence implementation of approach depend on external rates, models are expected to have an these reforms. which require a due diligence process increase in capital requirements from the bank. Due to the capital as a consequence of the output As previously mentioned, the focus floor, AIRB banks will also have to get a deeper understanding of the floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Capital Requirements
    December 19, 2017 Bank Capital Requirements Basel Committee Releases Standards to Finalize Basel III Framework SUMMARY On December 7, 2017, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision released standards to finalize its Basel III capital framework (commonly referred to as “Basel IV”).1 The Basel III capital framework was published in December 2010,2 and, since then, has been supplemented and revised by numerous standards published prior to December 2017.3 Although the Basel III capital framework primarily addressed the components of regulatory capital (i.e., the numerator of capital ratios) and the calibration of minimum required capital ratios (i.e., the minimum percentages), Basel IV largely focuses on the denominator in capital ratios—in particular, risk-weighted assets (“RWAs”) for purposes of the risk-based capital ratios. The Basel Committee describes Basel IV as finalizing post-crisis regulatory reforms for capital adequacy, but it is likely that the international framework for the regulation of bank capital will continue to evolve. Indeed, Basel IV and the Basel Committee’s accompanying materials note that the Basel Committee will (i) review the calibration of the revised market risk framework prior to its implementation on January 1, 2022,4 (ii) monitor the impact of leverage capital requirements on central clearing of derivatives and, by December 2019, conclude a review of the impact of leverage capital requirements on the provision of clearing services and resilience of central clearing,5 and (iii) review the treatment of credit
    [Show full text]
  • Basel IV Rules
    Collective Intelligence for Global Finance Basel IV Rules: The Impact Upon Capital Markets and the Securities Finance Industry July 2020 Basel IV Rules: The Impact Upon Capital Markets and the Securities Finance Industry Executive Summary The impact of the Covid-19 crisis to the global financial network has accelerated the downward transition of creditworthiness at a rate comparable to the 2008 Global Financial Crisis. The forthcoming Basel IV regulations will impact the global capital markets and have potentially serious consequences for the securities finance industry. Under Basel IV, banks’ internal ratings models will be set aside and unrated counterparts will carry a 100% RWA. Tens of thousands of high-quality but unrated obligors will attract this 100% risk weight. It is estimated that applying data from an external credit assessment institution (“ECAI”) could reduce the RWA dramatically, and produce a cost saving of 2 million USD per notional 1 billion USD of exposure. A potential solution to this dilemma is the regulatory-approved use of alternative sources of credit data to supplement the gaps in the “issuer paid” credit rating agency model. In 1966 Robert F. Kennedy made a speech about the About Credit Benchmark importance of individual action to drive necessary change. Credit Benchmark produces a comprehensive view of In the speech he said “Like it or not, we live in interesting credit risk by creating Consensus ratings and analytics times. They are times of danger and uncertainty; but they are on the credit quality of companies, financial also the most creative of any time in the history of mankind.” institutions, sovereigns and funds.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing for Basel IV: Why Liquidity Risks Still Present a Challenge to Regulators in Prudential Supervision
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Preparing for Basel IV: why liquidity risks still present a challenge to regulators in prudential supervision Ojo, Marianne North West University 22 December 2015 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/70888/ MPRA Paper No. 70888, posted 28 Apr 2016 13:40 UTC ABSTRACT This chapter considers and assesses various explanations attributed as principal factors of the recent Financial Crisis. In particular, it focuses on two principal regulatory tools which constitute the basis of the framework promulgated by recent Basel Committee's initiatives, that is, Basel III. These two regulatory tools being capital and liquidity requirements. Various conclusions have been put forward to explain what triggered the recent Financial Crisis. This chapter aims to explain why the Basel Committee's liquidity requirements and present proposals aimed at addressing liquidity risks, still represent a very modest milestone in efforts aimed at addressing challenges in prudential regulation and supervision. Even though problems attributed to capital adequacy requirements are considered by many authorities to have triggered the recent Crisis, the chapter will highlight how runs on banks are triggered by liquidity crises and that liquidity risks cannot be isolated from systemic risks. In so doing, it will incorporate the roles assumed by information asymmetries and market based regulation – hence elaborate on how market based regulation could serve to address problems which trigger liquidity risks. Imperfect knowledge being a factor which is contributory to liquidity crises and bank runs, and market based regulation being essential in facilitating disclosure - since the Basel Committee's focus on banks and prudential supervision cannot on its own, address the challenges encountered in the present regulatory environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Basel IV Poster
    Further enhancements of the Basel framework („Basel IV“) Concept Calibration TLAC: MREL: resolution plan (Pillar 2) Eligible instruments Excluded liabilities • Critical service Additional criteria • No preferential treatment Impact • All liabilities, if not • Covered deposits liab. • Not owed to the institution by national insolvency law common Pillar 1 Own Funds • Secured liabilities • Tax and social Regulatory Capital Principles Mechanisms requirement explicitly excluded itself • Bail-in evidence for • Minimum ratio including regular reporting and disclosure Global (FSB)/G-SIB: 5. Assessment of size, • Fiduciary liab. • Loss-absorbing and recapitalization capacity • Conversion into equity 1. Loss absorption, 2. Recapitalisation of 3. Liabilities excluded from 4. Deposit guarantee 6. Size and systemic risk: • Additional criteria security • Not funded directly/ liabilities subject to third requirements TLAC Term Sheet business/funding model, • Institution and • Continuity of functions, orderly resolution • Write-down 18% of RWA especially by own funds non-resolvable business bail-in due to operative scheme contribution effects on the financial defined for MREL/ authorities liab. indirectly by the institution country law • Depending on resolution scenario, requirements on risk profile, based on system (operator) • Stability of financial system (2022) functions importance or difficult considered system TLAC (Art 44, • DGS liab. (MREL) • Remaining maturity of at • Not subject to set off/ group and solo level (BCBS 342, FSB, BRRD) SREP
    [Show full text]
  • Basel “IV”: What’S Next for Banks? Implications of Intermediate Results of New Regulatory Rules for European Banks
    Basel “IV”: What’s next for banks? Implications of intermediate results of new regulatory rules for European banks Global Risk Practice April 2017 Authored by: Sebastian Schneider Gerhard Schröck Stefan Koch Roland Schneider 2 Implications of intermediate results of new regulatory rules for European banks Contents Executive summary 5 1 Beyond Basel III 6 1.1 Regulatory changes ahead 6 1.2 Need for a comprehensive view of regulations’ coming impact 6 2 Expected capital impact for the European banking industry 9 2.1 Impact at sector level 9 2.2 Variations in capital impacts between geographies … 10 2.3 ... size of institution 12 2.4 ... and business model 12 2.5 Expected impact on ROE 13 3 Implications and reactions: How banks can react 15 3.1 Mitigating actions 15 3.2 “No-regret” actions until Basel IV rules are finalized 22 Appendix 24 Global rules analyzed 24 Further regulatory initiatives 24 Methodology 26 Implications of intermediate results of new regulatory rules for European banks 3 Executive summary Many European banks will face significant capital shortfalls under the so-called Basel “IV” reforms proposed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). The current state of the suggested changes (a mix of consultation papers and finalized standards) would rework the approach to risk-weighted assets (RWA) and possibly internal ratings, as well as set regulatory capital floors. According to our analysis, if banks do nothing to mitigate their impact, these rules will require about €120 billion in additional capital, while reducing the banking sector’s return on equity by 0.6 percentage points.
    [Show full text]