A Rational Design Approach to Developing Second Generation Fabry Disease Treatments

University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses December 2020 A Rational Design Approach to Developing Second Generation Fabry Disease Treatments Matthew Metcalf University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Biochemistry Commons, and the Structural Biology Commons Recommended Citation Metcalf, Matthew, "A Rational Design Approach to Developing Second Generation Fabry Disease Treatments" (2020). Doctoral Dissertations. 2057. https://doi.org/10.7275/19197700 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/2057 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Rational Design Approach to Developing Second Generation Fabry Disease Treatments A Dissertation Presented by Matthew Metcalf Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 2020 Molecular and Cellular Biology © Copyright by Matthew Metcalf 2020 All Rights Reserved A Rational Design Approach to Developing Second Generation Fabry Disease Treatments A Dissertation Presented by Matthew Metcalf Approved as to style and content by: ____________________________________ Scott Garman, Chair ____________________________________ Peter Chien, Member ____________________________________ Jeanne Hardy, Member ____________________________________ Daniel Hebert, Member ____________________________________ Scott Garman Graduate Program Director Molecular and Cellular Biology DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my wonderful family. I really could not have completed this program without the support of my mother, Marianne, who was always there to support me throughout my entire life. She is a truly wonderful mother/person who has sacrificed so much for my brother and me. I could not have survived graduate school without my brother, Nate, who was my roommate and confidant throughout my graduate career. I would also like to thank my father, Matthew, my grandparents, Robert, Marlene, Joan, and Dean, as well as my extended family: Jeff, Jules, Emerald, Eden, Christian, Cameron, Lucas, and Amanda. ABSTRACT A Rational Design Approach to Developing Second Generation Fabry Disease Treatments September 2020 MATTHEW C. METCALF, B.S., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor Scott Garman Fabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder that affects approximately 1 in 40,000 males in its classical form and as many as 1:4,600 in its late-onset form [1]. The disease is caused by mutations in the gene encoding α- galactosidase (α-GAL), which results in deficient levels of α-GAL activity in the lysosomes of patients [2, 3]. This lack of enzymatic activity causes macromolecular substrates to accumulate in tissues, and can result in a wide range of symptoms such as impaired renal and cardiac function [4]. The severity of disease is linked to the amount of residual enzyme activity [5, 6]. Mutations resulting in little to no residual activity lead to the more severe classical form of the disease, whereas those that retain a fraction of wild-type enzyme levels lead to the less severe late-onset form of the disease. The FDA has approved both enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and pharmacological chaperone therapy (PCT) for the treatment of Fabry disease. ERT involves the intravenous injection of recombinant α-GAL. The injected enzyme is delivered to the lysosome through the binding of extracellular mannose- 6-phosphate receptors. ERT has been shown to clear accumulated substrate in the majority of tissue types, and has shown to slow the impairment of organ function v typically associated with the disease [7, 8]. Despite being broadly efficacious for the treatment of both forms of Fabry disease, additional treatment options were developed. PCT recently received approval for the treatment of a select number of Fabry patients. The treatment involves the oral administration of Galafold™, a small molecule also known as 1-deoxygalactonojirimycin (DGJ). DGJ is a potent competitive inhibitor of α-GAL, and acts by stabilizing mutant forms of α-GAL as they traffic to the lysosome [9, 10]. Only a portion of Fabry patients are approved to receive this treatment [11]. These patients possess one of the 348 genetic mutations for which this treatment has been found applicable. The majority of these patients have the late-onset form of the disease and possess some level of residual α-GAL activity. Despite the success of PCT and ERT at treating a broad number of patients there still exists a number of shortcomings associated with either treatment. One such shortcoming is the immunogenicity associated with the recombinant ERT enzymes. 88% of patients receiving ERT develop immune responses including both IgG and IgE based reactions [12-14]. It is our belief that the immune response is present because classical Fabry patients produce no correctly folded α-GAL, and when correctly folded α-GAL is presented to the immune system it is treated as foreign. This results in immune response and is likely to trigger the formation of neutralizing antibodies. In order to bypass this issue, we interconverted the active sites of α-GAL and a highly homologous human enzyme, α-NAGAL. The engineered enzymes possess lower catalytic efficiency than the wild-type counterparts, but have acquired the selectivity of their counterparts. We confirmed vi this through enzymatic characterization and through x-ray crystallography. Most importantly we showed that enzymes retain their native antigenicity. By engineering novel functionality into previously existing protein scaffolds we have highlighted a rational approach to engineering less immunogenic therapeutics. In addition to possessing undesirable immunogenic properties, the efficiency of ERT in the clearance of substrate in podocyte cells has come into question [15, 16]. These cells play a critical role in the function of the glomerular filtration barrier and ultimately kidney function. Due to the function of these cells, they form the third layer of filtration as well as performing vital role in the structure of glomerular capillaries, they are naturally a problematic cell type for serum-circulated ERT molecules to reach. Permeability of this barrier has been shown to be dependent on charge and molecular diameter, with permeability having an inverse relationship with molecular diameter. By engineering mutations that disrupt the dimer interface of α-GAL we have successfully expressed and purified a monomeric form of the enzyme, which possesses slightly lower than wild-type levels of activity and stability. The monomeric α-GAL may provide an excellent point of entry towards engineering a more potent ERT molecule for the treatment of renal variants of Fabry disease. While investigating the selectivity and affinity of α-Gal and α-NAGAL towards galactose and α-N-acetylgalactosamine analogs, we observed that at concentrations similar to those used in clinical trials DGJ significantly inhibits human β-GAL. This observation led us to further investigate the effect of α-linked functional groups attached to the position corresponding to C1 in a galactose scaffold. In DGJ and the vii 2-acetamido variant, DGJNAc, this position is occupied by a hydrogen. We utilized inhibition assays and x-ray crystallography to probe the effect of certain functional groups at this position on specificity and affinity towards α-GAL or α-NAGAL. We determined that these groups provided little to no change in affinity, but provided increased specificity towards α-selecting active sites. These findings coupled with previous studies performed by members of the Garman lab provide a clear set of guidelines towards developing ligands specific towards either α-GAL α-NAGAL. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………...v LIST OF TABLES .........................................................................................................xiii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................xvi 1. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................1 Lysosomes................................................................................................................1 Lysosomal trafficking ..............................................................................................1 Lysosomal storage disorders ....................................................................................2 Fabry disease ............................................................................................................4 Human -galactosidase ............................................................................................6 Treatments................................................................................................................7 Enzyme replacement therapy ...................................................................................8 Pharmacological chaperone therapy ......................................................................11 2. INTERCONVERSION

Load more