DOCSLIB.ORG

Pest Management Strategic Plan for Cantaloupe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pest Management Strategic Plan for Cantaloupe PEST MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN FOR CANTALOUPE, HONEYDEW AND MIXED MELON PRODUCTION IN CALIFORNIA Prepared for the United States Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency By the California Melon Research Board and the California Specialty Crops Council May 2016 Note: This document was revised in 2016 from the 2003 PMSP for Cantaloupe, Honeydew and Mixed Melons produced in California to represent input from and strategy of the California melon industry for 2016 – 2025. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 4 CALIFORNIA MELON PRODUCTION OVERVIEW .................................................................... 8 MELON PRODUCTION REGIONS .............................................................................................. 9 MELON CROP PHENOLOGY ................................................................................................... 11 FOUNDATION FOR A PEST MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN ......................................... 12 LAND PREPARATION TO PLANTING PERIOD ................................................................................ 14 EARLY SEASON PESTS – DIRECT SEEDING TO EMERGENCE AND STAND ESTABLISHMENT .......... 16 Major Insect Pests of Early Season Melons ....................................................................... 16 Potential/Sporadic Insect Problems in Early Season Melons ............................................. 18 Weed Management in Early Season Melons ..................................................................... 19 Specific Weed Problems in Early Season Melons .............................................................. 21 Diseases of Early Season Melons ...................................................................................... 24 Nematodes in Early Season Melons .................................................................................. 25 Vertebrate Pests of Early Season Melons .......................................................................... 26 PESTS OF ESTABLISHED MELONS (FROM STAND ESTABLISHMENT TO FLOWERING AND FRUIT DEVELOPMENT UP TO HARVEST) ............................................................................................... 27 Insects and Mites in Established Melons ............................................................................ 27 Melon Pollination ................................................................................................................ 32 Weeds in Established Melons ............................................................................................ 33 Diseases in Established Melons ......................................................................................... 35 Nematodes in Established Melons ..................................................................................... 39 Vertebrate Pests of Established Melons ............................................................................. 39 PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS ................................................................................................. 40 FRUIT MATURITY AND HARVEST ................................................................................................ 41 POST-HARVEST DISEASES ........................................................................................................ 41 FOOD SAFETY .......................................................................................................................... 43 INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND EXPORT ISSUES .................................................................. 43 CRITICAL PEST MANAGEMENT NEEDS FOR THE CALIFORNIA MELON INDUSTRY ...... 44 IR-4 PROJECT INFORMATION RELATIVE TO CALIFORNIA MELONS ................................ 45 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... 47 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................ 49 CALIFORNIA MELON PRODUCTION STATISTICS - 2013 ............................................................... 50 CULTURAL AND IPM ACTIVITIES TIME LINES FOR CALIFORNIA MELONS ...................................... 51 SEASONAL PEST OCCURRENCE TIME LINES .............................................................................. 53 EFFICACY TABLES .................................................................................................................... 55 PESTICIDE USE IN CALIFORNIA CANTALOUPES FROM 2011-2014 ............................................... 62 PESTICIDE USE IN CALIFORNIA MIXED MELONS FROM 2011-2014 .............................................. 67 WORKER PROTECTION ISSUES IN CALIFORNIA MELONS ............................................................. 72 MEMBERS OF THE CALIFORNIA MELON WORK GROUP IN ATTENDANCE – OCTOBER 14, 2015 ..... 74 CALIFORNIA MELON INDUSTRY - CONTACT INFORMATION .......................................................... 75 2 TABLES TABLE 1. MELON CROP PHENOLOGY IN DAYS ................................................................................................. 11 TABLE 2. MOST COMMON PESTICIDES USED IN CANTALOUPES, 2014. ............................................................. 12 TABLE 3. MOST COMMON PESTICIDES USED IN HONEYDEWS, 2014. ............................................................... 13 TABLE 4. HARVESTED ACREAGE, PRODUCTION (CARTONS/ACRE) AND CROP VALUE (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) IN CALIFORNIA ..................................................................................................................................... 50 TABLE 5. CULTURAL ACTIVITIES PROFILE FOR CALIFORNIA MELONS: SACRAMENTO & SAN JOAQUIN VALLEYS ... 51 TABLE 6. IPM ACTIVITIES AND PLANT MONITORING PROFILE FOR CALIFORNIA MELONS: SACRAMENTO & SAN JOAQUIN VALLEYS ................................................................................................................................ 51 TABLE 7. CULTURAL ACTIVITIES PROFILE FOR CALIFORNIA MELONS: DESERT VALLEYS .................................... 52 TABLE 8. IPM ACTIVITIES AND PLANT MONITORING PROFILE FOR CALIFORNIA MELONS: DESERT VALLEYS ........ 52 TABLE 9. MELON SEASONAL PEST OCCURRENCE: SACRAMENTO & SAN JOAQUIN VALLEYS .............................. 53 TABLE 10. SEASONAL PEST OCCURRENCE IN CALIFORNIA MELONS: DESERT VALLEYS ..................................... 54 TABLE 11. EFFICACY OF INSECT/MITE MANAGEMENT TOOLS USED IN CALIFORNIA MELONS .............................. 55 TABLE 12. EFFICACY OF NON-CHEMICAL INSECT MANAGEMENT TOOLS USED IN CALIFORNIA MELONS .............. 56 TABLE 13. RELATIVE TOXICITY OF INSECTICIDES TO BENEFICIAL ORGANISMS IN CALIFORNIA MELONS .............. 57 TABLE 14. EFFICACY OF DISEASE-MANAGEMENT TOOLS USED IN CALIFORNIA MELONS ................................... 58 TABLE 15. EFFICACY OF NEMATODE-MANAGEMENT TOOLS USED IN CALIFORNIA MELONS ................................ 59 TABLE 16 . EFFICACY OF WEED-MANAGEMENT TOOLS USED IN CALIFORNIA MELONS ...................................... 60 TABLE 17. EFFICACY OF RODENT & OTHER VERTEBRATE CONTROLS IN CALIFORNIA MELONS .......................... 61 TABLE 18. TOTAL POUNDS ACTIVE INGREDIENTS OF INSECTICIDES USED IN CALIFORNIA CANTALOUPES (2011- 2014) .................................................................................................................................................. 62 TABLE 19. ACRES TREATED WITH INSECTICIDES: CALIFORNIA CANTALOUPES (2011-2014) .............................. 63 TABLE 20. TOTAL POUNDS ACTIVE INGREDIENTS OF HERBICIDES USED IN CANTALOUPES (2011-2014) ............ 64 TABLE 21. ACRES TREATED WITH HERBICIDES: CALIFORNIA CANTALOUPES (2011-2014) ................................ 64 TABLE 22. TOTAL POUNDS ACTIVE INGREDIENTS OF FUNGICIDES USED IN CANTALOUPES (2011-2014) ............ 65 TABLE 23. ACRES TREATED WITH FUNGICIDES: CALIFORNIA CANTALOUPES (2011-2014) ................................ 65 TABLE 24. TOTAL POUNDS ACTIVE INGREDIENTS OF NEMATICIDES USED IN CANTALOUPES (2011-2014) .......... 66 TABLE 25. ACRES TREATED WITH NEMATICIDES: CALIFORNIA CANTALOUPES (2011-2014) .............................. 66 TABLE 26. TOTAL POUNDS ACTIVE INGREDIENTS OF INSECTICIDES USED IN CALIFORNIA MIXED MELONS* (2011- 2014) .................................................................................................................................................. 67 TABLE 27. ACRES TREATED WITH INSECTICIDES: CALIFORNIA MIXED MELONS* (2011-2014) ........................... 68 TABLE 28. TOTAL POUNDS ACTIVE INGREDIENTS OF HERBICIDES USED IN CALIFORNIA MIXED MELONS* (2011- 2014) .................................................................................................................................................. 69 TABLE 29. ACRES TREATED WITH HERBICIDES: CALIFORNIA MIXED MELONS* (2011-2014) ............................. 69 TABLE 30. TOTAL POUNDS ACTIVE INGREDIENTS OF FUNGICIDES USED IN CALIFORNIA MIXED MELONS* (2011- 2014) .................................................................................................................................................. 70 TABLE 31. ACRES TREATED WITH FUNGICIDES: CALIFORNIA MIXED MELONS* (2011-2014) ............................. 70 TABLE 32. TOTAL POUNDS ACTIVE INGREDIENTS OF NEMATICIDES USED IN CALIFORNIA MIXED MELONS* (2011- 2014) .................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Differences in the Sugar Composition of the Honeydew of Polyphagous
    NOTE Eur. J. Entomol. 108: 705–709, 2011 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1671 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Differences in the sugar composition of the honeydew of polyphagous brown soft scale Coccus hesperidum (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea) feeding on various host plants KATARZYNA GOLAN 1 and AGNIESZKA NAJDA2 1Department of Entomology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, LeszczyĔskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Vegetable and Medicinal Plants, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, LeszczyĔskiego 58, 20-068 Lublin, Poland Key words. Coccoidea, Coccus hesperidum, brown scale insects, honeydew, host plants, soft scale, sugar composition Abstract. Plant chemical composition is an important determinant of host plant-insect interactions. For many insects sugars are the main factors determining the acceptability of a plant. This study investigated changes in plant chemical composition and differences in sugar composition of different host plants induced by the feeding of Coccus hesperidum L. (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoi- dea). Present in plant extracts and honeydew there were three monosaccharide sugars: glucose, fructose and arabinose, and one disaccharide – sucrose. Arabinose was only found in extracts of Ficus benjamina plants. The sugar content of the honeydew was greater than in the extracts of control plants and lower than that in the extracts of infested plants. The honeydew collected from C. hesperidum feeding on the three plant species differed significantly in sugar content. Extracts of coccid infested plants of the three species used in this study contained more sugar than the un-infested control plants. The results show that honeydew composition of scale insects differ and the differences reflect the chemical composition of the host plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Bushhopper Stalk-Eyed Fly Coconut Crab Periodical Cicada
    PIOTR NASKRECKI PHOTO BANNERS HANGING IN CHANGING EXHIBIT GALLERY Bushhopper Stalk-Eyed Fly Phymateus viridipes Diasemopsis fasciata Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique A nymph of the bushhopper from Mozambique Like antlers on a deer’s head, the long can afford to be slow and conspicuous thanks eyestalks on this fly’s head are used in maleto- to the toxins in its body. These insects feed male combat, allowing the individual with on plants rich in poisonous metabolites, the largest stalks to win access to females including some that can cause heart failure, so most predators avoid them. Coconut Crab Periodical Cicada Birgus latro Magicicada septendecim Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands Annandale, Virginia The coconut crab is not just another land Periodical cicadas spend seventeen years crab; it is the largest living terrestrial underground, feeding on the roots of plants. invertebrate, reaching a weight of nine After that time they all emerge at the same pounds and a leg span of over three feet. time, causing consternation in people and Their lifespan is equally impressive, and the a feeding frenzy in birds. A newly emerged largest individuals are believed to be forty to (eclosed) periodical cicada is almost snow sixty years old. white, but within a couple of hours its body darkens and the exoskeleton becomes hard. BIG BUGS • Dec. 31, 2015 - April 17, 2016 Virginia Living Museum • 524 J. Clyde Morris Blvd. • Newport News, VA 23601 • 757-595-1900 • thevlm.org PIOTR NASKRECKI PHOTO BANNERS HANGING IN CHANGING EXHIBIT GALLERY Dung Beetles Lappet Moth Kheper aegyptiorum Chrysopsyche lutulenta Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique Dung beetles are very important members of At the beginning of the dry season in Savanna communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Sucrose Triggers Honeydew Preference in the Ghost Ant, Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) A
    Sucrose triggers honeydew preference in the ghost ant, Tapinoma melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) A. M. Zhou1, 2,*, B. Q. Kuang2, Y. R. Gao2, and G. W. Liang2 Abstract Honeydew produced by hemipterans mediates mutualistic interactions between ants and hemipterans. Previous studies demonstrated that the mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) produce abundant honeydew and attract a large number of tending ants. Ghost ants, Tapinoma melanocephalum (F.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), show a significant preference for mealybug honeydew over aphid honeydew. Although many studies have indicated that the honeydew produced by hemip- terans plays an important role in ant–hemipteran interactions, we know little about what triggers ants’ foraging preferences. Our results showed that the honeydew produced by both mealybugs and aphids contained fructose, sucrose, trehalose, melezitose, raffinose, and rhamnose. There were no significant difference in the concentrations of the various sugars between mealybugs and aphids, except sucrose. Xylose was present only in mealy- bug honeydew, and glucose was present only in aphid honeydew. We also found no substantial difference in the excretion frequency and the total weight of honeydew produced per 24 h between mealybugs and aphids. Ghost ants preferred sucrose. In addition, attractiveness of sucrose solutions increased significantly with increasing concentration. These results suggest that sucrose is the trigger for ghost ants’ honeydew preference. Key Words: ant–hemipteran mutualism; sugar composition; sugar concentration Resumen La mielcilla producida por hemípteros regula las interacciones mutualistas entre las hormigas y los hemípteros. Los estudios anteriores demostraron que la cochinilla harinosa Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) y el áfido Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) producen mielcilla abundante y atraen a un gran número de hormigas que atienden.
    [Show full text]
  • Citrus Mealybug Planococcus Citri (Risso) (Insecta: Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)1 Harsimran Kaur Gill, Gaurav Goyal, and Jennifer Gillett-Kaufman2
    EENY-537 Citrus Mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso) (Insecta: Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)1 Harsimran Kaur Gill, Gaurav Goyal, and Jennifer Gillett-Kaufman2 Introduction or several weeks. An average of 29 eggs per day is laid by females (Kerns et al. 2001, Meyers 1932). The citrus mealybug is a common pest of citrus primarily in greenhouses and of several ornamental plants in Florida. It has been recognized as a difficult-to-control pest in Europe since 1813 (where it is called the greenhouse mealybug) and in the United States since 1879 (Anonymous 2007). Distribution The pest is a native of Asia but is also found throughout the Americas, Europe, and Oceania. In North America, it is present in both Mexico and United States (Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Hawaii, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia) (CABI/EPPO 1999). Figure 1. Eggs are deposited as white cottony massess called ovisacs. Credits: Lyle Buss, University of Florida. Description and Life History Immatures Eggs Nymphs emerge from the ovisacs and typically settle along Eggs are deposited as white, cottony masses, called ovisacs, midribs and veins on the underside of leaves, young twigs, on the trunk and stems of citrus plants, giving the appear- and fruit buttons. They can also be found where two fruits ance of cotton spread on plants (Figure 1). The glossy, are touching each other (Figure 2) or on leaves clinging light yellow eggs are oval and approximately 0.3 mm long. to fruits. Due to their habit of hiding in crevices, light A female can lay from 300 to 600 eggs in her life period, infestations are easily overlooked.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis Aphid
    Insects/Mites that Feed on Hemp – Fluid Feeders Cannabis Aphid Cannabis aphid (Phorodon cannabis) is found on the leaves and stems of Cannabis. It is a light colored species and forms found indoors and forms found outdoors early in the season are cream- colored to pale yellow. Late in the season, as shortened day length triggers changes in the insect, forms that range from light green, to pale pink, to light brown predominate. This insect, only newly recognized from North America, is widespread in Colorado and known to occur in several other states and parts of Canada. Both wingless and winged forms occur. Some dark spotting occurs on winged forms. Wingless forms lack this patterning but may have pale striping running along the top of the body. Cannabis aphid feeds on fluids of the plant phloem, which it extracts through its "piercing-sucking" mouthparts. Very little, if any, injury occurs to cells from this feeding, so there are no symptoms on leaves of white flecking or surface scarring, such as is produced by spider mites or Wingless forms of cannabis aphid. thrips. Damage is caused by the loss of plant fluids. When high numbers of aphids are present and sustained this can cause reductions in plant vigor that can result in slowed growth, wilting, and leaf yellowing. As cannabis aphids feed, they also continuously excrete a sticky fluid, known as honeydew. This is produced in the form of tiny droplets which drop onto leaf surfaces below where it can be noticed as small shiny spots. This excreted honeydew can be an excellent diagnostic sign for detecting cannabis aphid infestations.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphid (Aphis Fabae)
    EXOTIC PEST FACT SHEET 7 Black Bean Aphid (Aphis fabae) What are they? What should I look for? How can I protect my industry? Black bean aphids (also known as black fly) mainly cause Symptoms of black bean aphid include leaf curling, Check your production sites frequently for the presence plant damage from direct feeding, particularly in broad distortion and wilting especially on young actively of new diseases and unusual symptoms. Make sure you beans and beetroot. Virus transmission by Black bean growing leaves (Fig 3). Leaves may also yellow and wilt, are familiar with common pests and diseases of your aphid is of relatively minor economic importance for along the edges first. Aggregations of black bean aphids industry so you can recognise something different. affected crops other than beetroot. may develop on soft shoot tips, flower stems and the underside of younger leaves. There may also be white What are the main hosts? skin casts associated with infestations. The presence of sooty mould and ants are often associated with black Black bean aphids are polyphagous pests associated bean aphids. with a large variety of vegetables including spinach, celery, asparagus, beetroot, capsicum, cucumber, pumpkin, globe artichoke, fennel, parsnip, bean, pea, How do they spread? Alliums, Brassicas, tomatoes, potatoes, broad beans and The black bean aphid can be carried on planting material beetroot. and some vegetables. The main method of dispersal is through migratory flight. Black bean aphids overwinter What do they look like? on a primary host, Euonmyos europaeus (spindle plant), before moving to a secondary host to complete their life Adults are about 2 mm long with a small head and cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status of the Invasive Rasberry Crazy Ant Nylanderia Sp
    Current Status of the Invasive Rasberry Crazy Ant Nylanderia sp. nr. pubens in Texas Alejandro Calixto Bart Drees Roger Gold Danny McDonald, Department of Entomology Texas A&M University Darwin, 27 April 2010 Houston, … we got a problem. Outline Introduction to RCA - Where/when detected - Features - Systematics - Problems - Management - Surveys and real time risk maps Rasberry Crazy Ant Outline Introduction to RCA - Where/when detected - Features - Systematics - Problems - Management - Surveys and real time risk maps Rasberry Crazy Ant Nylanderia sp. nr. pubens • Discovered by PCO (Tom Rasberry) 2002 Rasberry Crazy Ant Nylanderia sp. nr. pubens • Pasadena, TX (2002) – Industrial area – Large numbers • From the Caribbean or South America ?? Rasberry Crazy Ant Nylanderia sp. nr. pubens • Deer Park (2005) – Neighborhood 20022002 Key 2002 2005 2006 2007 20052005 Key 2002 2005 2006 2007 20062006 Key 2002 2005 2006 2007 20072007 Key 2002 2005 2006 2007 Rasberry Crazy Ant Nylanderia sp. nr. pubens • 14 Counties, November 2009 Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend, Galveston, Hardin, Harris, Jefferson, Jim Hogg, Liberty, Montgomery, Orange, Walker and Wharton Outline Introduction to RCA - Where/when detected - Features - Systematics -Problems - Management - Surveys and real time risk maps Rasberry Crazy Ant Nylanderia sp. nr. pubens • High reproductive rate Rasberry Crazy Ant Nylanderia sp. nr. pubens • High reproductive rate • Polygyne - Polydomas Rasberry Crazy Ant Nylanderia sp. nr. pubens • High reproductive rate • Polygyne - Polydomas • Loose foraging trails Rasberry Crazy Ant Nylanderia sp. nr. pubens • High reproductive rate • Polygyne - Polydomas • Loose foraging trails • Crawl rapidly and erratically = “crazy” Rasberry Crazy Ant Nylanderia sp. nr. pubens • High reproductive rate • Polygyne - Polydomas • Loose foraging trails • Crawl rapidly and erratically = “crazy” • Synanthropic Rasberry Crazy Ant Nylanderia sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in the Manna of Eucalyptus Viminalis
    Variation in the manna of Eucalyptus viminalis Department and University: School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania Supervisory team: Geoff While, Julianne O’Reilly-Wapstra and Peter Harrison Amy Wing May 2020 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree Bachelor of Science with Honours Declaration I hereby declare that this thesis contains no material which has previously been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma and contains no copy or paraphrase of material previously published or written by any other person, except where due reference is made in the text of this thesis. Statement on authority to access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Signed: Amy Wing Date: 20/05/2020 1 Acknowledgements I would love to thank my three amazing supervisors, Geoff, Julianne and Peter. This project was a blast, I loved all the knowledge and enthusiasm you all had towards me and my project. Thank you Geoff for getting me into such an amazing project and team, despite the fact I am not being a Lizard person. The immense support and advice on my work, no matter the hour, was such a huge help. Thanks to Peter for all the expertise in all things statistics. The hours upon hours you dedicated to helping me wrap my head around the data was absolutely essential for what I achieved. And thank you to Julianne for being such a great support and encouragement in my writing. Towards the end of this project, when we had to all work at a distance, all those small words of encouragement helped me keep going.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Black Beaq Aphid, Aphis Fabae Scop., and Its Honeydew on the Photosynthesis of Sugar Beet
    Ann. appl. Bioi. (1993), 122, 189-200 189 Printed in Great Britain The influence of black beaq aphid, Aphis fabae Scop., and its honeydew on the photosynthesis of sugar beet By MICHAL HUREJ* and WOPKE VAN DER WERF1 Wageningen Agricultural University, Department of Theoretical Production Ecology, P. 0. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands (Accepted 15 September 1992) Summary The effect of black bean aphids on the photosynthesis of sugar beet plants was studied under glasshouse and field conditions. The presence of up to several hundred aphids per leaf had no significant effect on C02 exchange rates over a range of light intensities between complete darkness and light saturation. Arti­ ficially prepared honeydew, sprayed onto leaves in the same amounts and composition as was found on severely aphid-infested plants, covered 30% of the stomata on the upper epidermis but did not significantly alter the rate of photosynthesis of these leaves in the light or the rate of respiration in the dark. The stomata on the lower epidermis were uncovered and functional. High pressure liquid chromatography of aphid-produced honeydew detected 20 dif­ ferent amino-acids. Three amino-acids, aspartic acid, glutamic acid and gluta­ mine, made up the bulk of the amino-acid weight in the honeydew produced on young plants, up till the 8 leaf-stage. In the 10 to 12 leaf-st.age, several different amino-acids occurred in substantial amounts. The amino-acids to sugars ratio of the honeydew produced by the aphids decreased strongly as the sugar beet plants aged: from 1:6 in plants with 3 or 4leaves to 1:25 in plants having 10 to 12leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • IPM-Recommended Insecticides Harm Beneficial Insects Through
    Environmental Pollution 267 (2020) 115581 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environmental Pollution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envpol IPM-recommended insecticides harm beneficial insects through contaminated honeydew* * Miguel Calvo-Agudo a, d, , Joel Gonzalez-Cabrera b, Daniele Sadutto c, Yolanda Pico c, Alberto Urbaneja a, Marcel Dicke d, Alejandro Tena a a Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), Centro de Proteccion Vegetal y Biotecnología, Unidad Mixta Gestion Biotecnologica de Plagas UV- IVIA, Carretera CV-315, Km 10,7, 46113, Moncada, Spain b Universitat de Valencia, Estructura de Recerca Interdisciplinar en Biotecnologia i Biomedicina (ERI-BIOTECMED), Unidad Mixta Gestion Biotecnologica de Plagas UV-IVIA, Dr Moliner 50, 46100, Burjassot, Spain c Universitat de Valencia, Centre of Research on Desertification (CIDE, CSIC-GV-UV), Carretera CV-315, Km 10,7, 46113, Moncada, Spain d Wageningen University, Laboratory of Entomology, PO Box 16, 6700AA, Wageningen, the Netherlands article info abstract Article history: The use of some systemic insecticides has been banned in Europe because they are toxic to beneficial Received 8 June 2020 insects when these feed on nectar. A recent study shows that systemic insecticides can also kill beneficial Received in revised form insects when they feed on honeydew. Honeydew is the sugar-rich excretion of hemipterans and is the 7 August 2020 most abundant carbohydrate source for beneficial insects such as pollinators and biological control Accepted 1 September 2020 agents in agroecosystems. Here, we investigated whether the toxicity of contaminated honeydew de- Available online 8 September 2020 pends on i) the hemipteran species that excretes the honeydew; ii) the active ingredient, and iii) the beneficial insect that feeds on it.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: Aphids
    Aphids Family: Aphididae Green Peach Aphid: nymphs, winged adults, and wingless adults. Photo by: Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University; Bugwood.org Wingless and winged aphids. Injury Aphids may damage many plants including fruits, vegetables, and ornamental trees and shrubs. The major damage is caused by the aphids sucking the juices from the stems and leaves causing a reduction in vigor, curling distortion, and reduction in yield. Some species inject saliva into the plant tissue as they feed and may transmit viral diseases from one plant to another. In addition to the direct damage caused to the plant by the aphids feeding, a black fungus known as sooty mold grows on the honeydew secreted by aphids. Sooty mold is unsightly and in association with honeydew it is objectionable to the buyer of affected plant material, fruits or vegetables. Description Aphids or plant lice are small, soft bodied, slow moving insects that feed by sucking juice from plants. They can usually be recognized by the pear-shaped body and fairly long antennae. Aphids vary in color -- white, gray, green, brown, red, yellow or black. They are usually found in large numbers (colonies) on the undersides of leaves or on stems. There are both winged and wingless aphids in most species. As the aphids feed they secrete honeydew – a sweet sticky shiny substance seen on leaves. Honeydew consists mainly of excess sap ingested by the insect and passed through the body. Life History Most species of aphids overwinter in the egg stage. The eggs hatch in the spring to produce a generation of females.
    [Show full text]
  • Christmas Island Yellow Crazy Ant Control Program
    Christmas Island Yellow Crazy Ant Control Program Moving from Chemical Control to a Biological Control Future Background The unique fauna and the ecological role of red crabs on Christmas Island The terrestrial landmass of Christmas Island is the top 361m of a 5km high seamount. It is a very remote island located 350km south of the island of Java, Indonesia and 2,600km north‐west of Perth. Christmas Island is 135km2 in area with 80km of coastline. It is markedly terraced from the coastal cliffs up to a central plateau and covered in thick forest in undisturbed regions. The climate is tropical with distinct wet and dry seasons. Image: Geoscience Australia. Christmas Island, along with the neighbouring Cocos (Keeling) Islands, make up the Indian Ocean Territories of Australia. They are governed by the federal Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development. Importantly, 63 per cent of Christmas Island is gazetted as a national park and managed by Parks Australia, a division of the federal Department of the Environment. Like many oceanic islands around the world, Christmas Island has evolved a unique flora and fauna during its many millions of years of undisturbed and remote existence. This special assortment of organisms extends from plants to birds, mammals, fish, reptiles and insects and of course to the famous land crabs for which the island is internationally renowned. Geographic location of Christmas Island in the north‐ eastern Indian Ocean. Image: Director of National Parks. The most iconic of these are the red and robber crabs, but they are just two of more than 20 species of land crabs on the island.
    [Show full text]