• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

;Draft version December 14, 2020 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 New Horizons Observations of the Cosmic Optical Background Tod R. Lauer,1 Marc Postman,2 Harold A. Weaver,3 John R. Spencer,4 S. Alan Stern,5 Marc W. Buie,4 Daniel D. Durda,4 Carey M. Lisse,3 A. R. Poppe,6 Richard P. Binzel,7 Daniel T. Britt,8 Bonnie J. Buratti,9 Andrew F. Cheng,3 W.M. Grundy,10 Mihaly Horanyi,´ 11 J.J. Kavelaars,12 Ivan R. Linscott,13 William B. McKinnon,14 Jeffrey M. Moore,15 J. I. Nu´nez,~ 3 Catherine B. Olkin,4 Joel W. Parker,4 Simon B. Porter,4 Dennis C. Reuter,16 Stuart J. Robbins,4 Paul Schenk,17 Mark R. Showalter,18 Kelsi N. Singer,4 Anne. J. Verbiscer,19 and Leslie A. Young4 1NSF's National Optical Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory,a P.O. Box 26732, Tucson, AZ 85726 2Space Telescope Science Institute,b 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218 3The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723-6099 4Department of Space Studies, Southwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut St., Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302 5Space Science and Engineering Division, Southwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut St., Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302 6Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California at Berkeley, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 7Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 8Department of Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 9Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109 10Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 11Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80303 12National Research Council of Canada, Victoria BC & Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC 13Independent consultant, Mountain View, CA 94043 14Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences and McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130 15NASA Ames Research Center, Space Science Division, Moffett Field, CA 94035 16NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 17Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, TX 77058 18SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA 94043 19University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904 (Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal) ABSTRACT We used existing data from the New Horizons LORRI camera to measure the optical-band (0:4 . λ . 0:9µm) sky brightness within seven high galactic latitude fields. The average raw level measured while New Horizons was 42 to 45 AU from the Sun is 33:2±0:5 nW m−2 sr−1: This is ∼ 10× darker than the darkest sky accessible to the Hubble Space Telescope, highlighting the utility of New Horizons for de- tecting the cosmic optical background (COB). Isolating the COB contribution to the raw total requires subtracting scattered light from bright stars and galaxies, faint stars below the photometric detection- limit within the fields, and diffuse Milky Way light scattered by infrared cirrus. We remove newly identified residual zodiacal light from the IRIS 100µm all sky maps to generate two different estimates arXiv:2011.03052v2 [astro-ph.GA] 9 Nov 2020 for the diffuse galactic light (DGL). Using these yields a highly significant detection of the COB in the range 15:9 ± 4:2 (1:8 stat:; 3:7 sys:) nW m−2 sr−1 to 18:7 ± 3:8 (1:8 stat:; 3:3 sys:) nW m−2 sr−1 at the LORRI pivot wavelength of 0.608 µm. Subtraction of the integrated light of galax- ies (IGL) fainter than the photometric detection-limit from the total COB level leaves a dif- fuse flux component of unknown origin in the range 8:8 ± 4:9 (1:8 stat:; 4:5 sys:) nW m−2 sr−1 to 11:9 ± 4:6 (1:8 stat:; 4:2 sys:) nW m−2 sr−1. Explaining it with undetected galaxies requires the galaxy-count faint-end slope to steepen markedly at V > 24 or that existing surveys are missing half the galaxies with V < 30. a The NSF's OIR Lab is operated by AURA, Inc. under coopera- tive agreement with NSF. b Operated by AURA, Inc., for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2 Lauer, Postman, Weaver et al. Keywords: cosmic background radiation | dark ages, reionization, first stars | diffuse radiation 1. HOW DARK DOES THE SKY GET? an outer solar system vantage point motivated Zemcov The simple fact that it's dark at night is known as et al.(2017) to use archival images obtained by NASA's \Olber's paradox," and argues that the Universe is finite New Horizons spacecraft during its cruise to Pluto to in time or space (Harrison 1987). Further insight into derive upper limits on the COB. From the limited obser- the formation and evolution of the Universe comes from vations available, Zemcov et al.(2017) derived COB flux asking exactly how dark the night sky is. The cosmic upper limits compatible with previous work. They also optical background (COB) is the average flux of visible argued that a dedicated New Horizons program of sky light photons averaged over the volume of the observ- observations might substantially improve constraints on able Universe. It reflects, at least in part, an integral the COB. over the cosmological history of star formation occur- New Horizons is presently travelling out of the solar ring in recognizable galaxies, proto-galaxies, and star system at over 14 km/s. After its encounter with Pluto clusters (Conselice et al. 2016), as well as mass accre- on July 14, 2015 (Stern et al. 2015) at 32.9 AU from the tion by black holes (BHs) associated with the systems. Sun, it has been traversing the Kuiper Belt, encounter- A diffuse component of the COB not associated with ing the Kuiper Belt object (KBO) Arrokoth on January any presently recognizable objects may determine how 1, 2019 (Stern et al. 2019) at 43.3 AU from the Sun. much star formation and active galactic nuclei power Over the last few years New Horizons has also been comes from stars or black holes in nominally low-density used to image distant unresolved KBOs (DKBOs) to regions of the Universe or that formed prior to the orga- search for satellites, obtain light curves, and determine nization of stars and BHs into recognizable associations. their phase coefficients (Porter et al. 2016; Verbiscer et A diffuse COB component (dCOB) may also reflect the al. 2019). A side product of this program has been the more exotic production of photons by the annihilation or serendipitous sampling of the background sky at large decay of dark matter particles (e.g. Maurer et al. 2012; distances from the Sun. Gong et al. 2016). Detection of a genuine dCOB, how- There are now several New Horizons imaging data sets ever, has remained elusive despite several attempts to obtained at > 40 AU from the Sun, with fields hav- search for it (Cooray 2016). Our goal is to measure the ing large solar elongations and high galactic latitudes. flux associated with the COB and to test for evidence Improvements in the operation of the LORRI camera of a dCOB. on board New Horizons provide for longer and hence Observation of the COB is challenging, as the total deeper exposures than were possible prior to the Pluto sky level measured by an astronomical instrument is the encounter. Continued analysis of LORRI's performance integral over several components that are stronger than has provided for more accurate photometry at low signal the COB. Rich knowledge and accurate calibration of levels. All of these factors motivate a new attempt to the low light-level performance of the instrument, itself, constrain the COB and search for a dCOB. We discuss is also required. Presently, all techniques to measure the archival LORRI data-sets suitable for the detection of optical sky (directly) are done with spacecraft to avoid faint sky signals in x2; and the reduction of the images the effects of airglow and artificial light on ground-based and measurement of total-sky levels in x3: Decomposi- measurements. However, observations made from the tion of the sky signals to correct for known light sources inner solar system are still strongly dominated by zodi- is presented in x4; and review of the resultant COB sig- acal light (ZL). The darkest sky available to the Hubble nal and comparison of it to previous measurements is Space Telescope, for example, is at the north ecliptic presented in x5: pole, but even there ZL is still over an order of magni- tude stronger than limits on the COB discussed in the 2. DARK SKY IMAGE-SETS literature. The bulk of the deep imaging observations conducted In contrast, ZL appears to be negligible in the outer by New Horizons has been done using its LORRI (the solar system. Figure1 shows the best estimate of the Long-Range Reconnaissance Imager) instrument. Com- flux of sunlight scattered by interplanetary dust (IPD) plete details on LORRI are provided by Cheng et al. as a function of distance from the Sun. This will be (2008) and Weaver et al.(2020), but in brief, it is an discussed in detail in x4:5; but in short, at distances be- unfiltered (white light) 1032 × 1024 pixel CCD imager yond 10 AU, the estimated ZL flux is well below the mounted on a 20.9 cm aperture Cassegrain reflector. In expected COB flux. The utility of COB measures from detail, the telescope itself is mounted in the interior of Cosmic Optical Background 3 3 10 60 40 JFC 2 10-19 KB 20 10 ] 3 ] OCC /m -1 0 2 [AU] Total [m sr 1 -20 -2 10 -20 -40 10 Cross Section Density LOS in ecliptic -60 solar elongation of 90° 0 10 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 [AU] 10-1 10-2 Brightness [nW m PD I 10-3 10-4 0 20 40 60 Heliocentric Distance [AU] Figure 1.

Load more

  32

Copy Link