DOCSLIB.ORG

FAX Cvr Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FAX Cvr Sheet CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE - 5 ILCS 140/7(1)(g) CONTAINS SENSITIVE BIOLOGICAL DATA – NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION OR DISCLOSURE PLEASANT RIDGE EXHIBIT 105 PN 1664.017-001 February 2009 CHIROPTERAN RISK ASSESSMENT PROPOSED PLEASANT RIDGE WIND ENERGY GENERATION FACILITY LIVINGSTON COUNTY, ILLINOIS Prepared for: Invenergy Wind Development LLC 1 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2020 Chicago, IL 60606 Prepared by: BHE Environmental, Inc. 11733 Chesterdale Road Cincinnati, OH 45246-3405 www.bheenvironmental.com Notice: This report has been prepared by BHE Environmental, Inc., solely for the benefit of its client in accordance with an approved scope of work. BHE assumes no liability for the unauthorized use of this report or the information contained in it by a third party. Copyright © 2009 BHE Environmental, Inc. CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE - 5 ILCS 140/7(1)(g) CONTAINS SENSITIVE BIOLOGICAL DATA – NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION OR DISCLOSURE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 1 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AREA ................................................. 3 2.1 Regional Conditions................................................................... 3 2.2 Site-specific Conditions .............................................................. 3 2.3 Bats ..................................................................................... 4 2.3.1 Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) .................................................. 5 2.3.2 Northern Long-Eared Bat (M. septentrionalis) ............................. 6 2.3.3 Little Brown Bat (M. lucifugus) .............................................. 7 2.3.4 Eastern Pipistrelle (Perimyotis subflavus) .................................. 7 2.3.5 Big Brown Bat (Eptesicus fuscus) ............................................. 7 2.3.6 Eastern Red Bat (Lasiurus borealis) ......................................... 8 2.3.7 Hoary Bat (L. cinereus) ........................................................ 8 2.3.8 Silver-Haired Bat (Lasionycteris noctivagans) .............................. 9 2.3.9 Evening Bat (Nycticeius humeralis) .......................................... 9 3.0 POTENTIAL EFFECTS TO BATS .......................................................... 9 3.1 Bat Mortality at Wind Energy Generation Facilities ........................... 10 3.2 Bat Collision Mortality .............................................................. 13 3.3 Habitat Degradation ................................................................ 15 3.4 Disturbance and Displacement of Bats .......................................... 16 4.0 LITERATURE CITED ...................................................................... 17 Chiropteran Risk Assessment ii BHE Environmental, Inc. Pleasant Ridge Wind Generation Facility CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE - 5 ILCS 140/7(1)(g) CONTAINS SENSITIVE BIOLOGICAL DATA – NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION OR DISCLOSURE TABLES Table 1. Attributes of the Pleasant Ridge Project area as compared to other Midwestern wind energy generation facilities where post-construction studies of bat mortality have been conducted. Table 2. Bats potentially present within five miles of the proposed Pleasant Ridge Planning Area during summer, winter, and spring/fall migration. FIGURES Figure 1. Proposed Pleasant Ridge wind energy generation facility, Illinois. Figure 2a. Proposed Pleasant Ridge wind energy generation facility (northern half), Livingston County, Illinois. Figure 2b. Proposed Pleasant Ridge wind energy generation facility (southern half), Livingston County, Illinois. Figure 3. Nearby wind energy generation facilities at which bat mortality studies have been completed. Figure 4. Ecoregion Sections at Pleasant Ridge and other nearby wind energy generation facilities. Figure 5. Approximate location of Pecumsaugan Creek-Blackball Mines Nature Preserve, LaSalle County, Illinois. Figure 6. Counties in which the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) occurs near the proposed Pleasant Ridge wind energy generation facility, Livingston County, Illinois. APPENDICES APPENDIX A Agency Correspondence APPENDIX B Photographs APPENDIX C Bats of the Pleasant Ridge Project Planning Area: Range Maps Chiropteran Risk Assessment iii BHE Environmental, Inc. Pleasant Ridge Wind Generation Facility CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE - 5 ILCS 140/7(1)(g) CONTAINS SENSITIVE BIOLOGICAL DATA – NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION OR DISCLOSURE 1.0 INTRODUCTION Invenergy Wind Development LLC of Chicago, Illinois, proposes construction of the Pleasant Ridge wholesale wind energy generation facility in Livingston County, Illinois (Figure 1). The general location of the Pleasant Ridge facility (―project planning area‖) spans 165 mi2 (427.4 km2) of southern Livingston County. Towns near the planning area include Fairbury, Forrest, and Chatsworth, Illinois. The planning area is approximately 1 percent forested, with forested areas occurring primarily in the Vermilion River and parts of the Indian Creek floodplains. Land use within the planning area is primarily agricultural (Figure 2). The planning area represents the maximum area considered for placement of turbines and facility infrastructure. The actual area occupied by the turbines, transmission line, and access roads that will comprise the facility will be a very small percentage of the Project planning area. Details of the transmission line and access road routing have not been determined at this time, though the transmission line is expected to be 5 to 10 mi (8 to 16 km) in length and will terminate at the Pontiac midpoint substation near the town of McDowell, in Livingston County. The Pleasant Ridge facility will consist of approximately 330 wind turbines, located in strings or arrays within the Project planning area. Current plans call for installation of a mix of 1.5 MW and 2.5 MW turbines (GE Model 1.5 sle and GE Model 2.5 xl. The maximum total nameplate project capacity will be 695 megawatts (MW) (assuming approximately 130 1.5 MW and 200 2.5 MW turbines. The hub height on the GE 1.5 MW turbines is approximately 262.5 ft (80 m) agl and rotors will be approximately 126.3 ft (38.5 m) long. With the rotor tip in the 12 o'clock position, the wind turbines will reach a maximum height of approximately 388.8 ft (118.5 m) above ground level (AGL). At the 6 o'clock position, the rotor tip will be approximately 136.2 ft (41.5 m) AGL. The turbine rotor will turn at a maximum operating speed of 20.4 revolutions per minute (rpm). Each 2.5 MW turbine will have a hub height of approximately 328.1 ft (100 m) agl and rotors will be approximately 164 ft (50 m) long. With the rotor tip in the 12 o'clock position, the wind turbines will reach a maximum height of approximately 492.1 ft (150 m) AGL. At the 6 o'clock position, the rotor tip will be approximately 164 ft (50 m) AGL. The turbine rotor will turn at a maximum operating speed of 14.1 rpm. Both turbine models have a nominal ―cut-in speed‖ of 7.9 miles per hour (3.5 meters per second [m/s]). That is, winds of 3.5 m/s contain sufficient energy to support the generation of electric power by the turbine. At wind speeds below 3.5 m/s, as measured by an anemometer atop each nacelle, the turbine’s ―primary brake‖ is applied (i.e., the turbine blades are feathered by orienting the primary surface of each blade parallel to the wind direction). With the primary brake applied, the blades will not rotate around the hub, or will rotate very slowly (less than 1 rpm). Control systems allow the cut-in wind speed to be set independently at each turbine. Wind speeds above 3.5 m/s will result in blade speeds of 1 to 20.4 rpm, depending upon wind speeds. If wind speeds at an operating (spinning) turbine drop below the cut-in speed, the primary brake is applied and the blades come to a stop within approximately one minute. Control systems allow the cut-in wind speed to be set Chiropteran Risk Assessment 1 BHE Environmental, Inc. Pleasant Ridge Wind Generation Facility CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE - 5 ILCS 140/7(1)(g) CONTAINS SENSITIVE BIOLOGICAL DATA – NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION OR DISCLOSURE independently at each turbine. If wind speeds at an operating (spinning) turbine drop below the cut-in speed, the primary brake is applied and the blades come to a stop within approximately one minute. Turbines will be lit with red strobe-like or incandescent flashing lights. Lighting will be limited to the minimum number required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for aircraft safety. Each turbine tower will be set upon a concrete pad with an aboveground diameter of approximately 15 ft (4.5 m). Nominally, crops and other vegetation within approximately 180 ft (55 m) of each tower site will be cleared, yielding a maximum of 330, 2.3-acre openings (759 acres of clearing for tower sites). The total cleared area required for erection of turbines will be approximately 1.19 mi2 (3.08 km2), or approximately 0.07 percent of the total Project planning area. As tree cover is extremely sparse within the Project planning area and most land use is agricultural, it is expected that there will be little or no removal of trees necessary for construction of turbines. Interactions between wind turbines and wildlife, particularly flying creatures such as birds and bats, are a known and documented occurrence. Utility-scale wind turbines can directly and indirectly affect bats that occur
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Do We Need to Use Bats As Bioindicators?
    biology Perspective Do We Need to Use Bats as Bioindicators? Danilo Russo * , Valeria B. Salinas-Ramos , Luca Cistrone, Sonia Smeraldo, Luciano Bosso * and Leonardo Ancillotto Wildlife Research Unit, Dipartimento di Agraria, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Università, 100, 80055 Portici, Italy; [email protected] (V.B.S.-R.); [email protected] (L.C.); [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (L.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (D.R.); [email protected] (L.B.) Simple Summary: Bioindicators are organisms that react to the quality or characteristics of the environment and their changes. They are vitally important to track environmental alterations and take action to mitigate them. As choosing the right bioindicators has important policy implications, it is crucial to select them to tackle clear goals rather than selling specific organisms as bioindicators for other reasons, such as for improving their public profile and encourage species conservation. Bats are a species-rich mammal group that provide key services such as pest suppression, pollination of plants of economic importance or seed dispersal. Bats show clear reactions to environmental alterations and as such have been proposed as potentially useful bioindicators. Based on the rel- atively limited number of studies available, bats are likely excellent indicators in habitats such as rivers, forests, and urban sites. However, more testing across broad geographic areas is needed, and establishing research networks is fundamental to reach this goal. Some limitations to using bats as bioindicators exist, such as difficulties in separating cryptic species and identifying bats in flight from their calls.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Northern Bats (Eptesicus Nilssonii)
    23 Nyctalus (N.F.), Berlin 19 (2018), Heft 1, S. 23-27 New records of Northern bats ( Eptesicus nilssonii ) in boreal clear cuts emphasize the value of green-tree retention for conservation 1HXH1DFKZHLVHGHU1RUGÁHGHUPDXV Eptesicus nilssonii ) unterstreichen den Erhalt von Einzelbäumen auf borealen Kahlschlägen Von SIMON T HORN , Rauhenebrach, SEBASTIAN S EIBOLD , Freising, OSMO HEIKKALA , MATTI KOIVULA , PARVATHY VENUGOPAL , JARI KOUKI (alle Joensuu) Abstract ,QFUHDVLQJ PDQDJHPHQW LQWHQVLÀFDWLRQ RI IRUHVWV ZRUOGZL - et al. 2005). For example, increasingly intensive de has decreased biodiversity across multiple taxonomical forest management has altered forest biodiversity groups. To limit these losses conservationists promote green- across multiple taxonomical groups ( PAILLET et al. WUHHUHWHQWLRQLQFRPELQDWLRQZLWKSUHVFULEHGÀUHVLQERUHDO forests. We evaluated the potential value of retention trees on 2010). To limit these losses various retention ap- prescribed-burned clear cuttings for bats, an important target proaches have been proposed ( LINDENMAYER et al. WD[RQLQQDWXUHFRQVHUYDWLRQ%HQHDWKORRVHEDUNRIÀUHNLOOHG 2012). In case of boreal forests across the north ern retention trees we found two adult male individuals of Epte- sicus nilssonii roosting in less than two meters’ height. This hemisphere retention approaches are increasing- ÀQGLQJXQGHUOLQHVWKHLPSRUWDQFHRIWUHHUHWHQWLRQRQFOHDU O\FRPPRQO\FRPELQHGZLWKSUHVFULEHGÀUHRI cuttings for nature conservation in boreal forests. varying severity to mimic natural-disturbance dynamics ( GRANSTRÖM 2001; RYAN et al. 2013). Keywords 6XFKDFRPELQDWLRQ\LHOGVVLJQLÀFDQWLPSDFWLQ conservation of rare saproxylic beetles ( HYVÄ - conservation, forest management, Eptesicus nilssonii , pre- VFULEHGÀUHV)LQODQG RINEN et al. 2006), birds and small mammals (FONTAINE & KENNEDY 2012). Hence, variable Zusammenfassung retention has become a common conservation measure at clear cuts in Fennoscandia since the Durch eine Intensivierung der Waldbewirtschaftung sind die mid-1990’s ( GUSTAFSSON et al. 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Distribution, Taxonomy and Karyology of the Genus Plecotus
    TurkJZool 27(2003)293-300 ©TÜB‹TAK OntheDistribution,TaxonomyandKaryologyoftheGenus Plecotus (Chiroptera:Vespertilionidae)inTurkey AhmetKARATAfi DepartmentofBiology,FacultyofScience-Art,Ni¤deUniversity,Ni¤de–TURKEY NuriY‹⁄‹T,ErcümentÇOLAK,TolgaKANKILIÇ DepartmentofBiology,FacultyofScience,AnkaraUniversity,Ankara-TURKEY Received:12.04.2002 Abstract: Plecotusauritus andPlecotusaustriacus wererecordedfrom8and3localitiesintheAsiaticpartofTurkey,respectively. Itwasdeterminedthatthelengthofthefirstpremolar,theshapeofthezygomaticarchesandbaculumdistinguishthesetaxaf rom eachother.Apartfromthesemorphologicalcharacteristics,thetibialengthof P.austriacus wasfoundtobesignificantlygreater thanthatof P.austriacus (P<0.05).Thediploidchromosomenumberswereidenticalinbothtaxa(2n=32).Thenumberof chromosomalarms(FN=54)andthenumberofautosomalchromosomalarms(FNa=50)werethesameasinpreviouslypublished papersonP.austriacus. KeyWords: Plecotusauritus,Plecotusaustriacus,Karyology,Turkey Türkiye’deYay›l›flGösterenPlecotus (Chiroptera:Vespertilionidae)CinsininYay›l›fl›, TaksonomisiveKaryolojisiÜzerineBirÇal›flma Özet: Plecotusauritus sekizvePlecotusaustriacus üçlokalitedenolmaküzereAnadolu’dankaydedildi.‹lkpremolarlar›nuzunlu¤u, zygomatikyay›nvebakulumunfleklininbutaksonlar›birbirindenay›rd›¤›saptand›.Bumorfolojikkarakterlerdenbaflka, P. autriacus’untibiauzunlu¤ununP.austriacus’tanistatistikiolarakdahabüyükoldu¤ubelirlendi(P<0.05).Diploidkromozomsay›s› herikitaksondabenzerbirflekilde2n=32dir. P.austriacus’unkromozomkolsay›lar›n›n(FN=54)veotosomalkromozomkol say›lar›n›n(FNa=50)literatüreuygunoldu¤ubulundu.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT INTERIM CONFERENCE and PLANNING GUIDANCE USFWS Regions 2, 3, 4, 5, & 6
    US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT INTERIM CONFERENCE AND PLANNING GUIDANCE USFWS Regions 2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 January 6, 2014 NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT INTERIM CONFERENCE AND PLANNING GUIDANCE On October 2, 2013, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) proposed the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis; NLEB) for listing as endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The purpose of this document is to address the immediate information needs for section 7 conferences and conservation planning for the NLEB should it be listed. Please consider the following: • The information and guidance in this document should not be considered final because the FWS is still making a listing decision for NLEB. • This document provides the FWS’ current suggestions and recommendations for NLEB- consideration in project planning. This document should not be considered mandatory, unless where stated by regulation (i.e., conference requirements). • Much of the support and documentation (e.g., citations) for this document is contained in the attached appendices. It is important to note that, due to the preliminary nature of the state of knowledge of the NLEB, the approaches and information contained within this guidance and appendices may change as we gain additional information on the NLEB and its habitat. Species Overview This section provides a brief overview of the NLEB ecology and threats. Please reference the listing proposal or the FWS website for further information. This information may be found at: http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nlba/index.html. We recommend that project proponents or their representatives coordinate with the appropriate FWS Field Office to more clearly define the range and suitable habitat for their particular state/region as some differences in state/regional suitability criteria may be warranted.
    [Show full text]
  • Amendment Adding Northern Long-Eared
    Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) Photo by Virgil Brack; ESI Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan Amendment Northern Long-eared Bat January 2015 NiSource Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan Amendment Executive Summary NiSource’s Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) represents an innovative approach to provide for both enhanced conservation of listed species and streamlined regulatory compliance for facility activities. The MSHCP addressed 42 species and provided an organized and efficient way to avoid adverse effects to, and also minimize and mitigate for any anticipated take of, these species potentially caused by covered activities. It satisfied applicable provisions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) pertaining to federally listed species protection, and it concurrently has improved the permitting efficiency for the construction, operation, and maintenance of NiSource’s natural gas pipelines and ancillary facilities by providing a predictable regulatory process for ESA issues under which pipeline activities can proceed. NiSource Inc. was issued an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS) on September 13, 2013 and full implementation began on January 1, 2014. As contemplated in Chapter 9 Amendment Process in the original MSHCP, from time to time the MSHCP would need to be amended to add newly listed species that might be affected by NiSource’s activities. The intent of this Amendment is to add the Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) to the MSHCP and ITP. Before amending the ITP, the Service will undertake a combined intra-agency and inter-agency “Section 7 consultation” to include the Service and other federal agencies with jurisdiction over some of NiSource’s covered activities, specifically the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Intra- and Interspecific Competition in Western Barbastelle Bats
    Intra- and interspecific competition in western barbastelle bats (Bbastell bastellus, SCHREBER 1774): Niche differentiation in a specialised bat species, revealed via radio-tracking. Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades "Doktor der Naturwissenschaften" am Fachbereich Biologie der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität in Mainz Jessica Hillen geb. am 09.01.1981 in Zell (Mosel) Mainz, 2011 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 16.12.2011 Western barbastelle bats in their tree roost. Background: View of the brook valley 'Ahringsbachtal'. Contents Contents. Abstract..............................................................................................................................................5 General introduction. ..........................................................................................................................7 Chapter I. Spatial organisation and foraging site fidelity of a population of female western barbastelle bats...................................................................................................................................................12 Abstract....................................................................................................................................13 1. Introduction. ....................................................................................................................14 2. Materials and methods......................................................................................................16 3. Results. ............................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G Final SCR Panther Grove 05152020
    LWEG Tiers 1 and 2 Site Characterization Report Panther Grove Wind Energy Project Woodford County, Illinois May 15, 2020 Prepared for: Panther Grove Wind, LLC 17300 N. Dallas Parkway, Ste. 2020 Dallas Texas 75248 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 2300 Swan Lake Blvd., Suite 202 Independence, IA 50644 Phone: (319) 334-3755 Fax: (319) 334-3780 Project #193706902 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 1 1.2 REGULATORY BACKGROUND .................................................................................... 1 1.3 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................... 2 2.0 METHODS ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 PRELIMINARY SITE EVALUATION (TIER 1) ................................................................. 4 2.1.1 Land Cover and Use ...................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Wetlands and Waterways ............................................................................... 4 2.1.3 Migratory Birds ...............................................................................................4 2.1.4 Eagles and Other Raptors .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BAT FIELD TECH WORKSHOP.Pmd
    Gathering evidence of the utility of bats: Training in Field Techniques for Ecological Studies of Chiroptera C. Srinivasulu* and Sally Walker** The Chiroptera Conservation and Information Network of South Asia (CCINSA) and the IUCN SSC Chiroptera Threatened bats of India Specialist Group joined with the College of Forestry, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur to conduct its second field Fruit bats (Megachiroptera) -- total 5 techniques training workshop, from 28 July – 1 August 2003 Latidens salimalii Thonglongya, 1972 -- EN sponsored by Chester Zoo and Marwell Zoo, U.K at Thrissur. Pteropus faunulus Miller, 1902 -- EN Pteropus hypomelanus Temminck, 1853 -- EN The first such workshop was conducted at Madurai Pteropus melanotus Blyth, 1863 -- VU Kamaraj University, School of Biological Sciences almost Pteropus vampyrus (Linnaeus, 1758) -- EN two years ago, ably led by Dr. Paul Bates from U.K. and author of the definitive book on bats of this region Bats of Insectivorous bats (Microchiroptera) -- total 24 the Indian Subcontinent, (1997). He was assisted by Dr. M. Hipposideros diadema (E. Geoffroy, 1813) -- VU S. Pradhan and Dr. Y. P. Sinha from the Zoological Survey of Hipposideros durgadasi Khajuria, 1970 -- EN India. This workshop focused on general field techniques Hipposideros hypophyllus Kock & Bhat, 1994 -- EN and taxonomy with a day spent on the IUCN Red List Ia io Thomas, 1902 -- EN Criteria and Categories and the C.A.M.P. Workshop Process Miniopterus pusillus Dobson, 1876 -- VU in order to prepare CCINSA members for the impending Murina grisea Peters, 1872 -- CR Chiroptera C.A.M.P. which was held last year in January. Myotis annectans (Dobson, 1871) -- VU Myotis blythii (Tomes, 1857) -- VU The South Asian Chiroptera C.A.M.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats
    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
    [Show full text]
  • Listeria Monocytogenes Infection of Bat Pipistrellus Nathusii Epithelial Cells Depends on the Invasion Factors Inla and Inlb
    pathogens Article Listeria monocytogenes Infection of Bat Pipistrellus nathusii Epithelial Cells Depends on the Invasion Factors InlA and InlB Olga Povolyaeva 1, Yaroslava Chalenko 2,3,* , Egor Kalinin 3, Olga Kolbasova 1, Elena Pivova 1, Denis Kolbasov 1 , Sergey Yurkov 1 and Svetlana Ermolaeva 2,3 1 Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology (FRCVM), 601125 Volginsky, Russia; [email protected] (O.P.); [email protected] (O.K.); [email protected] (E.P.); [email protected] (D.K.); [email protected] (S.Y.) 2 Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology (FRCVM), Nizhny Novgorod Research Veterinary Institute Branch, Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia; [email protected] 3 Gamaleya Research Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Laboratory of Ecology of Pathogenic Bacteria, 123098 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-92-5936-7317 Received: 13 September 2020; Accepted: 21 October 2020; Published: 22 October 2020 Abstract: L. monocytogenes is a widespread facultative intracellular pathogen. The range of natural hosts that supporting L. monocytogenes persistence in the environment has not been fully established yet. In this study, we were interested in the potential of L. monocytogenes to infect cells of bats, which are being increasingly recognized as a reservoir for microorganisms that are pathogenic to humans and domestic animals. A stable epithelial cell line was developed from the kidneys of Pipistrellus nathusii, a small bat widely distributed across Europe. The wild-type L. monocytogenes strain EGDe infected this cell line with an invasion efficiency of 0.0078 0.0009%. Once it entered bat cells, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessments for Five Forest Bat Species in the Eastern United States
    United States Department of Agriculture Conservation Forest Service Assessments for Five General Technical Report NC-260 Technical Guide Forest Bat Species in the 2006 Eastern United States Front Cover: Illustrations by Fiona Reid, Ontario, Canada ©. Species from top: Pipistrellus subflavus, Myotis leibii, Myotis austroriparius, Myotis septentrionalis, Nycticeius humeralis. United States Department of Agriculture Conservation Forest Service Assessments for Five General Technical Report NC-260 Technical Guide Forest Bat Species in the 2006 Eastern United States Edited by Frank R. Thompson, III Thompson, Frank R., III, ed. 2006. Conservation assessments for five forest bat species in the Eastern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-260. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. 82 p. Assesses the status, distribution, conservation, and management considerations for five Regional Forester Sensitive Species of forest bats on national forests in the Eastern United States: eastern pipistrelle, evening bat, southeastern myotis, eastern small-footed myotis, and northern long-eared bat. Includes information on the taxonomy, description, life history, habitat distribution, status, and population biology of each species. KEY WORDS: conservation status, habitat use, life history, Myotis austroriparius (southeastern myotis), Myotis leibii (eastern small-footed myotis), Myotis septentrionalis (northern long-eared bat), Pipistrellus subflavus (eastern pipistrelle), Nycticeius humeralis (evening bat), Region 9, USDA Forest Service Disclaimer The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contribution to the Bats Inhabiting Arid Steppe Habitats in Central Mongolia Nyambayar Batbayar Mongolian Academy of Sciences, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Erforschung biologischer Ressourcen der Mongolei Institut für Biologie der Martin-Luther-Universität / Exploration into the Biological Resources of Halle-Wittenberg Mongolia, ISSN 0440-1298 2010 A Contribution to the Bats Inhabiting Arid Steppe Habitats in Central Mongolia Nyambayar Batbayar Mongolian Academy of Sciences, [email protected] Ariunbold Jargalsaikhan Mongolian State University of Education, [email protected] Sukhchuluun Gansukh Mongolian Academy of Sciences, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biolmongol Part of the Asian Studies Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Environmental Sciences Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, and the Other Animal Sciences Commons Batbayar, Nyambayar; Jargalsaikhan, Ariunbold; and Gansukh, Sukhchuluun, "A Contribution to the Bats Inhabiting Arid Steppe Habitats in Central Mongolia" (2010). Erforschung biologischer Ressourcen der Mongolei / Exploration into the Biological Resources of Mongolia, ISSN 0440-1298. 65. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biolmongol/65 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Institut für Biologie der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Erforschung biologischer Ressourcen der Mongolei / Exploration into the Biological Resources of Mongolia, ISSN 0440-1298 by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Copyright 2010, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle Wittenberg, Halle (Saale). Used by permission. Erforsch. biol. Ress. Mongolei (Halle/Saale) 2010 (11): 329-340 A contribution to the bats inhabiting arid steppe habitats in central Mongolia B. Nyambayar, J. Ariunbold & G. Sukhchuluun Abstract Bats of the steppe habitat require particular attention in Mongolia because of increasingly frequent droughts and the looming specter of global warming which could have a devastating impact on their population.
    [Show full text]