![Arxiv:2007.09418V2 [Cond-Mat.Soft] 9 Feb 2021 Min Lations Showed That the Exponent Β Depends on D in a Structure of Unjammed Packings [27]](http://data.docslib.org/img/2dbce3f19ec3daf6d3282320cae0ee0c-1.webp)
Relaxation dynamics of non-Brownian spheres below jamming
Yoshihiko Nishikawa,1 Atsushi Ikeda,2 and Ludovic Berthier1, 3 1Laboratoire Charles Coulomb (L2C), Universit´ede Montpellier, CNRS, 34095 Montpellier, France 2Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Komaba, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan 3Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom (Dated: February 11, 2021) We numerically study the relaxation dynamics and associated criticality of non-Brownian fric- tionless soft spheres below jamming in spatial dimensions d = 2, 3, 4, and 8, and in the mean-field Mari-Kurchan model. We discover non-trivial finite-size and volume fraction dependences of the relaxation time associated to the relaxation of unjammed packings. In particular, the relaxation time is shown to diverge logarithmically with system size at any density below jamming, and no critical exponent can characterise its behaviour approaching jamming. In mean-field, the relaxation time is instead well-defined: it diverges at jamming with a critical exponent that we determine numerically and differs from an earlier mean-field prediction. We rationalise the finite d logarithmic divergence using an extreme-value statistics argument in which the relaxation time is dominated by the most connected region of the system. The same argument shows that the earlier proposition that relaxation dynamics and shear viscosity are directly related breaks down in large systems. The shear viscosity of non-Brownian packings is well-defined in all d in the thermodynamic limit, but large finite-size effects plague its measurement close to jamming.
I. INTRODUCTION diverging relaxation time, thus connecting the viscosity divergence to some form of dynamic slowing down. Fur- The jamming transition is an athermal critical phase ther, the connection with the slowest mode of the vi- transition between a fluid at low density and a disor- brational density of states would then finally relate two dered solid at large density [1–3]. Exactly at jamming, macroscopic quantities (the relaxation time and the vis- particles form a rigid network and the number of con- cosity) to the detailed microstructure of unjammed pack- ings, whose geometry controls the vibrational density of tacts z between particles is equal to zc = 2d, where d is the spatial dimension [3,4]. The contact forces and dis- states [27, 35]. Physically, Eq. (1) follows from the nu- tances between particles follow power-law distributions merical observation that the field of particle displace- with non-trivial exponents [5–8]. Above jamming, the ments under shear or during relaxational dynamics both excess contact number z − 2d, mechanical modulus, and have a very strong overlap with the spatial structure of vibrational properties also exhibit non-trivial critical be- the slowest vibrational mode [27, 35]. havior [3,4,8,9]. The measured critical exponents agree Despite these recent developments, both the valid- with predictions from mean-field theories [9–11] down to ity and physical content of Eq. (1) remain open issues. d = 2, suggested to be the upper critical dimension for There is no consensus yet on the value of the exponent β jamming. and its physical origin. Theoretical arguments developed By contrast to these well-understood results, the crit- in Refs. [27, 37–39] result in a quantitative prediction, icality of systems approaching jamming from the un- β ' 3.41, which is directly linked to the values of known jammed phase is still under intense scrutiny [12–22]. critical exponents for the jamming transition. This sug- When jamming is approached from below, the shear vis- gests that β should also be independent of the spatial cosity exhibits a critical divergence [14, 23–30]. Similarly, dimension for d ≥ 2. Recently, a mean-field study anal- in both sheared and isotropic systems, the relaxation dy- ysed the exponent β using the perceptron model of jam- namics slows down approaching jamming [31–37]. In ad- ming, with a different prediction, β ' 2.55 [40], again dition, both quantities have been linked to the frequency expected to hold in any d ≥ 2. However, several simu- ω of the softest vibrational mode characterising the arXiv:2007.09418v2 [cond-mat.soft] 9 Feb 2021 min lations showed that the exponent β depends on d in a structure of unjammed packings [27]. Recent numerical surprising manner. The relaxation time in d = 2 and simulations and theoretical arguments suggested that the d = 3 models has β ' 2.7 and β ' 3.3, respectively. relaxation time τ, the viscosity η, and the inverse squared 2 These values were measured from the relaxation dynam- frequency 1/ωmin, all follow the same critical behavior ics starting from steady shear trajectories [34]. The value η ∼ τ ∼ 1/ω2 ∼ (∆z)−β, (1) β ' 3.2 is reported in both sheared and isotropic cases min for d = 3 [35], from relaxation dynamics as well. More with ∆z ≡ 2d − z > 0 now defining the shortage of diverse values β ∈ [2.0 − 2.8] are obtained by direct mea- contacts from the isostatic limit. surements of the shear viscosity, which is notoriously dif- If correct, the physical content of Eq. (1) is remark- ficult to determine [14, 23, 29, 30, 41]. Therefore, the able since it connects an important physical quantity, determination of a precise value, the dimensional depen- the shear viscosity of non-Brownian suspensions, to a dence, the mean-field theoretical value of the dynamical 2 exponent β, and its dependence on the chosen observable II. MODELS AND METHODS for its measurement, are all unresolved issues. We study harmonic spheres defined by the following pair interactions In this paper, we numerically study the dynamics of 2 unjammed packings with three main goals. (i) We anal- X rij rij yse the relaxation dynamics over a broad range of spatial E = 1 − Θ 1 − , (2) 2 σij σij dimensions, d = 2, 3, 4 and 8 to assess its dimensional- i
2 of the dynamics is τ0 = ζσsmall/ for the binary mix- where we introduce a Gaussian window function of typi- 2 ture and τ0 = ζσ / for the monodisperse model. We cal width σfilter express timescales in units of τ0. Similarly, σsmall or σ are the unit length. The equation of motions are solved −r2/(2σ2 ) −r2/(2σ2 ) e filter − e c filter , |r| < r , by the simple Euler method. During the overdamped dy- W (r) = c (7) namics, the energy asymptotically decays exponentially, 0 , |r| > rc, E ∼ exp(−t/τ). We thus define d(log E)−1 τ = − (4) with ri the position of particle i. Here, for example, dt Oi = |f i| for the force, Oi = zi for the contact number, as the relaxation time when the energy density reaches where f i and zi are the force acting on particle i and the the value E/N = 10−18. Before entering the asymptotic contact number of particle i, respectively. For illustrative exponential regime, the local relaxation time Eq. (4) mea- purposes, we choose rc = 30 and σfilter = 4. The values of sured for each realisation typically grows with time before σfilter and rc do not change the visualization qualitatively converging to its final asymptotic value. The threshold unless they are small enough compared to the box size. E/N = 10−18 is small enough that the local relaxation To analyse shear rheology, we study both the steady time converges for all the system sizes studied in this pa- state properties and the relaxation dynamics of the bi- per. Since the relaxation time defined in this manner is nary mixture model in two dimensions. To achieve the computed in the final stages of the energy relaxation to- steady sheared state, we solve the equations of motion wards an unjammed configuration, it corresponds to the slowest timescale characterising the relaxation process. We stress that the relaxation time τ is different from a re- ∂ri ∂E ζ − γy˙ iex = − (8) laxation time measured in an equilibrium context, which ∂t ∂ri usually quantifies the time decay of a microscopic corre- lation function. Here, τ describes the timescale needed to reach the final unjammed state starting from a given with Lees-Edwards boundary conditions [46] in y direc- initial condition with finite overlaps. tion, whereγ ˙ is the shear rate, yi is the y-coordinate of Since we stop the overdamped dynamics when the en- particle i, ζ is the damping coefficient, and ex represents ergy density E/N = 10−18 > 0, many particles in the the unit vector parallel to x direction. The time unit of 2 final configurations have finite (but very small) overlaps the dynamics is again τ0 = ζσsmall/. The shear viscos- with their neighbors and are thus subject to finite forces ity η and its pressure analog ηp are defined as the shear (which are vanishing exponentially with time and are zero stress σ and the pressure p divided by the shear rateγ ˙ , at t = ∞). To characterize each final configuration, we respectively. The shear stress σ and the pressure p are count the contact number z between particles. Before computed using the following formulae: computing the contact number, we iteratively remove rattler particles that have less than d contacts until all re- maining particles have more than d contacts [27, 33]. The 1 X xijyij ∂E σ = , (9) volume fraction after removing rattlers becomes slightly N r ∂r i
estimate is β ' 3.3, but larger systems and a more care- ful finite-size scaling analysis would perhaps modify this 107 ∝∆z-3.3 value by a small amount. Such an analysis would be -2.8 τ ∝∆z useful to compare the mean-field value to the prediction β ' 3.41 obtained in Ref. [39]. 106
N = 262144, 2D B. Relaxation dynamics in finite dimensions 105 4096, 2D 4096, 3D Relaxation time In sufficiently high dimensions, we may expect the sys- 4 4096, 4D 10 4096, 8D tem to approach some mean-field behaviour. Since two MK model, 4096, 3D distinct mean-field models (the perceptron and the MK models) exhibit different dynamical exponents, it is im- 10-3 10-2 ∆z/2d = (2d-z)/2d portant to directly study the dimensional dependence of the behaviour of τ. We study the relaxation dynamics of harmonic spheres from random configurations in d = 2, 3, FIG. 1. Relaxation time τ as a function of ∆z = 2d − z in d = 2, 3, 4, 8 and in the mean-field MK model. For d ≥ 3 4 and 8. As for the MK model, we measure the relaxation and the MK model, β ' 3.3 at small ∆z, whereas for d = 2 time τ using Eq. (4), and plot τ against ∆z in Fig.1. β ' 2.8. Two system sizes are shown in d = 2, suggesting The jamming densities are known to be φJ ' 0.842 for that finite-size effects are large for large ∆z. the two-dimensional model [47], and φJ ' 0.65, 0.46, 0.078 for the three-, four-, and eight-dimensional models [48], respectively. We thus study the volume fractions in the range of [0.8, 0.842], [0.627, 0.634], [0.445, 0.451], and III. RELAXATION TIME IN VARIOUS SPATIAL DIMENSIONS [0.074, 0.075] for two, three, four, and eight dimensional models for Fig.1. We find that the exponent β ' 3.3 works well in a A. Dynamical exponent in the Mari-Kurchan wide range of dimensions, from d = 8 down to d = 3, model where the relaxation time seems to follow a power-law with the same exponent β ' 3.3 at small enough ∆z. The We study the relaxation dynamics of the MK model. results in d = 3 are consistent with previous reports [34, We solve Eq. (3) starting from random initial configu- 35]. We conclude that, over the range of system sizes rations. The volume fractions we studied in this model used in Fig.1, harmonic spheres in d ≥ 3 and the MK range from φ = 1.42 to φ = 1.46. In the large-size limit model follow a very similar behaviour as they approach N → ∞, the system at the jamming transition shows an jamming where τ → ∞ and ∆z → 0. This behaviour algebraic energy decay E ∼ t−α. An algebraic decay is seems different from the perceptron model prediction. still observed in finite systems at short time with α . 1 A hint that this may not be the final story is the be- when the packing fraction is close enough to jamming, haviour revealed by the two-dimensional model, which but the decay crosses over to being exponential at large does not share the same apparent value of the expo- times. In this regime, we compute the relaxation time τ nent β. The growth of the relaxation time is noticeably using Eq. (4). milder in two dimensions, and the fitting gives an expo- In Fig.1, we plot τ against ∆z = 2d−z, the shortage of nent β ' 2.8. These results confirm the surprising dimen- the contact number in the final configuration. The con- sional dependence of the exponent reported recently [34]. tact number is calculated after removing the rattlers (see The dimensional dependence of the apparent exponent Sec.II). Note that larger ∆ z values correspond to lower could suggest the existence of a characteristic dimension packing fractions. The figure shows that τ cannot be fit- between d = 2 and d = 3 where the dynamic critical- ted by a single power-law in the entire density region. If ity changes qualitatively. This interpretation would also −2 we focus on the lower density region ∆z/2d & 4 × 10 , suggest that the critical dynamics is not fully determined the power-law fitting Eq. (1) gives the exponent β ' 2.6. by static exponents for jamming since the static expo- This is comparable with an estimated value for the re- nents are independent of dimensionality down to d = 2 laxation time of the perceptron model β = 2.55(15) [40]. [3,4,8,9] as we mentioned in Sec.I. However, the relaxation time at smaller ∆z grows more We will in fact suggest a very different interpretation, rapidly. It eventually crosses over to another power-law namely that the exponent β characterising the growth −2 behavior with β ' 3.3 at ∆z/2d . 10 . Even if we eval- of τ when jamming is approached is actually not well- uate the exponent for our data up to ∆z/2d ' 3 × 10−2 defined in finite-dimensional models. As a result, the by fitting to Eq. (1), it yields β ' 3.0, significantly larger dimensionality dependence of its apparent value is im- than the estimation in Ref. [40]. Therefore, we conclude material, and the findings in Fig.1 should not be taken that the dynamical exponent β of the MK model is not as the sign of an emerging non-trivial upper critical di- equal to that of the perceptron model [40]. Our best mension for the dynamics of non-Brownian suspensions. 5
z dependence on N below N = 642 than at fixed contact 2D, 3.83 < < 3.84 55 3D, φ = 0.57 6000 φ = 0.83 3D MK, φ = 1.0 number. 0.82 5000 50 τ (a) (b) At much larger N, on the other hand, the relaxation time τ grows similarly regardless of the averaging proce- 4000 45 dure. Crucially, its asymptotic dependence is a logarith- N ∝ log + const. mic growth, τ(N) ∼ log N. This unbounded logarithmic 40 3000 growth with the system size suggests that the relaxation time τ is not well-defined in the thermodynamic limit, as 2000 35
Relaxation time it diverges when N → ∞ at a finite distance below the jamming transition. We find the slope becomes smaller 1000 30 as φ decreases and it would go to zero in the limit φ → 0, ∝ log N + const. but the logarithmic growth should appear at any finite φ 0 25 below jamming. 162 322 642 1282 2562 512210242 162 322 642 1282 2562 5122 Number of particles N Number of particles N This finite-size effect is surprising since the system is FIG. 2. (a) Relaxation time τ as a function of the particle not expected to have a diverging lengthscale in the entire number N in d = 2 averaged either at fixed z or fixed volume unjammed phase, but to be critical at the jamming tran- fraction φ. (b) Same plot in d = 3 and for the Mari-Kurchan sition only. We may wonder whether two dimensions is model at fixed φ. A logarithmic growth τ ∼ log N in both a special dimension, as it is for instance for other types d = 2 and d = 3, but is not observed in the MK model: of equilibrium phase transitions [49]. In Fig.2(b), we τ(N → ∞) is not defined in finite d. show that the same logarithmic behaviour at large N is in fact present for d = 3 (here, at fixed volume fraction φ = 0.57). We expect the logarithmic behaviour to be a We can see hints of this interpretation in Fig.1 where generic feature in any d < ∞ below jamming. the relaxation time data for the two-dimensional system with N = 4096 and N = 262144 seem to show a similar power-law behavior at small ∆z, but appear to behave In the previous section, we discussed the value of an ap- very differently away from the transition above ∆z & parent critical exponent β for the relaxation time. How- 2 × 10−2. This suggests that finite-size effects should be ever, because the relaxation time is divergent in the entire analysed more precisely, as we discuss in the following. unjammed phase, we have to carefully consider the phys- ical meaning of these measurements. We emphasize that when the volume fraction is very close to the jamming IV. LOGARITHMIC DIVERGENCE OF THE transition, the logarithmic growth only appears when RELAXATION TIME very large systems sizes are considered. For instance, Fig.1 shows that the relaxation time at N = 262144 and −2 Whereas the relaxation time τ in finite-dimensional N = 4096 nearly coincide for ∆z/(2d) . 2 × 10 , where models seems to follow a power-law divergence towards we determined an effective critical exponent. We observe ∆z → 0, it also seems to suffer from finite-size effects, that it becomes harder to detect the logarithmic growth which are seen already at modest volume fractions and closer to jamming, which presumably explains why this relatively large ∆z away from jamming. effect has not been detected before. This suggests the ex- istence of a lengthscale ξ(φ) controlling the emergence of a logarithmic divergence, and ξ(φ) may be controlled by A. Logarithmic growth of the relaxation time the distance to jamming, as we directly confirm below.
Fig.2(a) shows the relaxation time τ as a function of Finally, Fig.2(b) also shows the system size depen- the number of particles N averaged over samples with dence of the relaxation time in the mean-field MK model. contact number z ∈ [3.83, 3.84], which corresponds to Clearly, the MK model is free from the logarithmic diver- ∆z/2d ∈ [4 × 10−2, 4.25 × 10−2], and with fixed volume gence at large N. Therefore, the measured dynamical ex- fractions φ = 0.82 and φ = 0.83 in two dimensions. ponent β is well-defined even in the thermodynamic limit In small systems, the contact number at fixed density for the mean-field model. This suggests that the physical has large sample-to-sample fluctuations. The relaxation origin of the logarithmic growth is a finite dimensional ef- time of small systems averaged at fixed density receives fect affecting the definition and determination of β when contributions from samples with a wide range of contact d < ∞. Numerical observations in dimensions d = 4 and numbers, and this is expected to have larger finite-size 8 suggest that over a broad range of system sizes and effects compared to the case of an average at a fixed con- volume fractions, these systems behave very similarly to tact number. Indeed, the relaxation time averaged at the MK model, which may then serves as a useful guide fixed volume fraction φ = 0.83 has a more pronounced for finite d systems but only over a finite regime. 6
(a) (b) 40 40
30 30 y y 20 20
10 10
0 0 0 10 20 30 40 0 10 20 30 40 x x
10-3 10-2 10-3 10-2 Amplitude of force | f(x, y)|/〈| f |〉 Amplitude of the slowest eigenmode
FIG. 3. Coarse-grained fields (see Eq. (6)) for (a) the ampli- tude of the normalized force, and (b) the slowest eigenmode in a relaxed unjammed configuration at φ = 0.7 with N = 1024. Both fields are almost equivalent and seem correlated over the entire system.
B. Relaxation with multiple islands
Because of the overdamped equation of motion, parti- cle motion is directly controlled by the net forces acting on the particles. In particular, the displacement of each FIG. 4. Coarse-grained force field in d = 2 for N = 262144 particle during the terminal relaxation should be pro- and volume fractions (a) 0.6, (b) 0.8, (c) 0.82, and (d) 0.83. portional to the force acting on each particle in the final The size of the correlated large force ‘islands’ (yellow) grows configuration [35]. This suggests that an analysis of the rapidly with increasing φ. force field should shed light on the relaxation dynamics and provide insight on the physical origin of the logarith- mic divergence of τ. We focus on d = 2, as larger system for N = 262144 (L ∼ 600) at various volume fractions. sizes can be simulated and visualisation is much easier. For φ = 0.6 and φ = 0.8, the force field does not form a We first focus on the case of a modest system size, single correlated region, but is instead composed of mul- N = 1024 (L ∼ 40), and volume fraction, φ = 0.7. In tiple ‘islands’ where the force has a larger amplitude than Fig.3(a), we show the coarse-grained force field in a re- in the rest of the system where forces are much smaller laxed unjammed configuration (see Sec.II for the defi- (the colour codes for forces in a logarithmic scale). The nition). This shows that the field is correlated over the emergence of the multiple islands is unrelated to the con- entire system, with a single region of weaker forces and nectivity percolation transition in the system, which oc- a single domain where forces are larger. Both domains curs at φ ' 0.55 [50]. In our study, the system is always have a linear size comparable to L. percolated and the multiple islands we identify with the We also show the coarse-grained field of the eigenmode force field all belong to the percolated cluster. associated with the lowest non-zero eigenfrequency ωmin In such systems, we find that the softest eigenmode is of the Hessian matrix for the same final configuration mainly localized on a single one of these islands, while in Fig.3(b). These two fields are almost equivalent, the other islands correspond to other eigenmodes with confirming the deep connection between the softest vi- slightly larger frequencies. These observations were ob- brational mode in unjammed configurations and the fi- tained by directly measuring the Hessian matrix in the nal force field controlling the relaxation time τ. This final configuration for a system size N = 16384, large large correlation rationalises previous observations that enough to detect multiple islands and small enough that 2 τ ∼ 1/ωmin [35]. a diagonalisation of the Hessian remains numerically fea- The visual impression is confirmed by a direct analysis sible. As a result, the projection of the softest eigenmode of the projection of the eigenmode onto the force field. onto the residual force field decreases with increasing the At this volume fraction, the projection yields 0.992(3). system size. 2 −1 The equality τ = (2ωmin) also holds numerically, con- The physical picture is that each of the large-force is- firming the harmonic nature of the final stage of the re- lands observed in the final configuration relaxes on its laxation dynamics [35]. own timescale, but the relaxation time for the entire sys- The situation becomes very different with increasing tem is dominated by the slowest of these independently- the system size. Fig.4 shows coarse-grained force fields relaxing islands. 7
1 10 2 crossover length ξ(φ). There is a first regime at small )| N φ = 0.4 r = 16 ( 322 0.5 N, i.e. L < ξ(φ), where the force correlation is limited 2 2 10 0.6 0 64 1/2 by the system size, so that ξforce(φ, N)/L = O(1) and force 10 1282 0.7 ∝N C 2 the system is composed of a unique correlated island. At 256 force 0.82 ξ larger N, i.e. L > ξ(φ), the force correlation enters a
10-1 second regime where ξforce(φ, N)/L 1, and the system (a) (b) breaks into multiple independent islands. This behaviour echoes the evolution of the relaxation time which is nearly 10-2 constant (or decreases slightly with N) in the first regime, 101 and increases logarithmically in the second. Indeed, we observe that the typical system size where the crossover 10-3 Correlation length occurs, i.e. L ' ξ(φ), in both quantities is indeed similar.
φ = 0.82
Force correlation function | Importantly, the breaking of the system into indepen- 10-4 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 162 322 642 1282 2562 dent sub-systems emerges when N is large enough, but r Number of particles N the crossover size ξ(φ) where this happens seems to de- pend very strongly on the volume fraction, and appears FIG. 5. (a) Absolute value of the force correlation function to become very large when the jamming transition is ap- |Cforce(r)| for d = 2 and φ = 0.82 and various N. The cor- proached. The most natural interpretation is that the relation length ξforce is defined as the distance where Cforce behaviour of all the quantities studied here is governed changes sign. (b) The evolution of ξforce with N for various by a growing correlation lengthscale ξ(φ) which diverges 1/d φ changes from ξforce ∼ L ∼ N to a slower logarithmic as the jamming transition is approached. We discuss the growth at large N. physical content of ξ(φ) more extensively in Sec.VI.
In addition, Fig.4 shows that the typical size of these islands increases rapidly as the volume fraction increases towards jamming. As a result, a single correlated island seems to cover the whole system for φ = 0.83, despite the fact that the system size is large N = 262144 (the linear size is larger than L ∼ 600). To quantitatively analyze the emergence of the islands C. Logarithmic growth explained by extreme-value corresponding to domains where the force field is spa- statistics tially correlated, we measure the spatial correlation func- tion of the forces Cforce(r), defined in Eq. (5). Fig.5(a) shows the absolute value |Cforce(r)| for φ = 0.82 and var- We have established that the logarithmic growth of the ious system sizes. The absolute value is needed when us- relaxation time takes place in the regime where L > ξ(φ), ing a logarithmic vertical axis, as the correlation changes when the system is large enough to exhibit multiple sign at large r. We expect that Cforce(r) first vanishes at correlated islands where the relaxation dynamics can a distance corresponding to the typical size of the islands take place independently. We now use an extreme-value seen in Fig.4. Therefore, we define the correlation length statistics argument to explain the logarithmic growth of ξforce as Cforce(ξforce) = 0 to measure the linear extension τ with N. of the correlated force islands. The results are shown in Fig.5(b) which presents the Let us suppose that the timescale τisl controlling the evolution of ξforce(φ, N) for various values of φ and sev- relaxation locally in each island follows the probability eral system sizes N in d = 2. At low φ, the correlation distribution P (τisl). The global relaxation time of the length ξforce exhibits a mild increase with N at large N system τ corresponds to the slowest timescale in a given and its absolute value is modest. When φ increases (see configuration. We suppose that one configuration with N for instance φ = 0.82), the growth of ξforce is initially particles can be decomposed into M independent islands, much stronger, compatible with ξ ∼ L ∼ N 1/d. This (i) force which provide M independent timescales {τ }i=1,··· ,M . suggests that in this regime, the force correlation length isl The probability that the maximum value in the set {τ (i)} is actually bounded by the linear size of the system, com- isl (i) M patible with the snapshots where the force field appears is smaller than t is Prob(t > max{τisl }) = F (t) , where R t 0 0 correlated over the entire system. For larger N, even- F (t) = 0 P (τ )dτ is the cumulative distribution func- tually, this very fast increase of ξforce slows down and tion of P (τ). The probability distribution for the largest resembles the findings for low φ, compatible with a slow, time among the M islands is thus ∂(F (t)M )/∂t. As- presumably logarithmic, growth. suming a simple form for the probability distribution The data for the force correlation length suggest the P (τ) = θ−1 exp(−τ/θ), the average value hτi and the existence of two regimes of system sizes, separated by a cumulative distribution G(τ) of the largest timescale, i.e. 8
80 1150
N=256 p Relaxation time τ Relaxation time τ η )
p Viscosity A η Viscosity A η τ 1024 p p p p ( -1 A ′ 10 4096 1100 75 G 16384 65536 . . γ = 10-6, φ = 0.8 γ = 10-7, φ = 0.83 262144 1050 1048576 70 Ap = 18 Ap = 18
-2 φ = 0.60 , Viscosity 10 τ 1000
65 950
-3 10 60
Probability distribution 900 (a) (b) Relaxation time 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 55 850 Relaxation time τ 162 322 642 1282 2562 162 322 642 1282 2562 Number of particles N Number of particles N FIG. 6. Measured probability distribution functions of the relaxation time τ at φ = 0.6 for several system sizes in d = 2. FIG. 7. Relaxation time and shear viscosity as a function of Fits to Eq. (12) are shown with dashed lines. the system size for (a) φ = 0.8 and (b) and 0.83. We multiply ηp with the constant Ap = 18 [33] for convenience. In (a), τ grows logarithmically with N, but the viscosity remains finite and is almost independent of N. In (b), both τ and ηp first decrease with N, but only τ is expected to diverge as N → ∞. of the relaxation time τ, are given by
V. DECOUPLING OF SHEAR VISCOSITY AND ∞ M Z X 1 RELAXATION TIME hτi = M tF (t)M−1P (t)dt = θ ∼ θ log M, k 0 k=1 (11) Previous sections have shown that τ ∼ (∆z)−β in Z τ Eq. (1) cannot be correct as both τ and ω are not M min G(τ) = M F (t)M−1P (t)dt = (1 − exp (−τ/θ)) . defined in the unjammed phase in the thermodynamic 0 limit. These two quantities are controlled by the slowest (12) region of the entire system, whose timescale and length- scale increases logarithmically with N. Regarding the shear viscosity, we can think of two pos- These expressions explain our numerical results quite sibilities: It either diverges like the relaxation time and well. To show this, we plot the probability distribution it is not defined in the thermodynamic limit, or it re- function of the relaxation time G0(τ) obtained from nu- mains finite and diverges as jamming is approached with merical simulations in d = 2 for φ = 0.6 in Fig.6. Each a critical exponent β. The shear rheology is character- of the measured distribution is fitted to the expression ized by the steady state shear viscosity η = σ/γ˙ and its G0(τ) = M exp(−τ/θ) (1 − exp (−τ/θ))M−1 /θ, using M pressure analogue ηp = p/γ˙ , where σ is the shear stress, and θ as fitting parameters. The fit is clearly excellent, γ˙ the shear rate, and p the pressure. Previous studies using a nearly constant value θ ≈ 2.9, and a parameter M 0.77 suggested that the relaxation time τ measured after sud- growing rapidly with N (a numerical fit gives M ∼ N , denly stopping the shear is proportional to the shear vis- close to the naive linear growth expected for the number cosity [33]. This coupling was physically rationalised by of independent islands). This agreement supports the the observation that the softest eigenmode of the Hes- above argument using extreme-value statistics. sian controls both the relaxation dynamics [35] and the The logarithmic growth of the relaxation time then response to shear [27]. follows from Eq. (11), which shows that the largest re- On the other hand, the above results for the relax- laxation time among M islands scales as the logarithm ation dynamics from random configurations suggest that of the number of islands M. A similarly slow growth the situation may be different in large enough systems. would hold for any functional form of the distribution Therefore, we need to revisit the relaxation dynamics P (τ) provided its first moment is not divergent [51, 52]. from sheared configurations and its relation to the rhe- This shows that the emergence of multiple finite-sized is- ology. The corresponding simulation methods were de- lands in unjammed configurations is responsible for the scribed in Sec.II. logarithmic divergence of the relaxation time in the ther- Starting from sheared configurations in the steady modynamic limit which eventually prevents the definition state, we analyse the relaxation dynamics to measure of the critical exponent β from the relaxation time τ. the relaxation time τ as shown in Fig.7(a) for φ = 0.8 9 in d = 2. Again, the relaxation time increases loga- Note, however, that even though the viscosity satu- rithmically with N, showing that it is divergent in the rates to a constant value at large N, it is subject to very thermodynamic limit, just as for random configurations. strong finite-size effects which persist up to very large sys- Fig.7(b) shows results for φ = 0.83, which mimic again tem sizes, L ∼ ξ(φ). As noticed before, we expect these the results for random configurations. Closer to jamming finite-size effects to become weaker if the relaxation time it becomes more difficult to observe the logarithmic be- and the viscosity are averaged at fixed contact number haviour at large N, as the crossover length ξ(φ) to enter and not at fixed volume fraction, but the proper mea- the large N regime is larger. surement of the viscosity requires L ξ(φ). We also find that the force field in the sheared case has Several works have used scaling analysis to estimate the same properties as for the isotropic case. When the the critical exponent of the shear viscosity [28–30] and system size is small or the volume fraction is very close already pointed out that this is difficult due to a compli- to jamming, the force field and the softest eigenmode cated scaling behavior near criticality and large correc- are correlated over the whole system. These two fields tions to scaling. Our results demonstrate that the large- are almost equivalent as they have a very large overlap. N limit of the viscosity is only accessible when the linear However, when the system size becomes large enough, size of the system is much larger than a typical length- multiple islands appear and the overlap between the two scale ξ(φ) which seems to grow very fast as jamming is becomes small, even in the sheared case. As the particle approached. For instance, a recent work estimated the configuration evolves with time during the steady shear, β = 2.68(8) in d = 2 using a scaling analysis of the shear the relaxed configuration also changes depending on the viscosity [30]. However, the estimated exponent is very starting configurations. The above findings about the close to the apparent value for τ in Fig.1, and the range islands hold very typically for the configurations in the of system sizes used in Ref. [30] belong to the regime steady states although we have not studied the detailed L < ξ(φ). The large-N limit for the shear viscosity ap- dynamics of the islands. pears even harder to achieve in larger dimensions. Next, we focus on the steady state shear viscosity. Fig.7(a) compares the viscosity ηp with the relaxation time τ for φ = 0.80. It is clear that the viscosity does not VI. DISCUSSION show the same logarithmic increase at large N as τ. We conclude that the shear viscosity is finite in the thermo- In summary, we studied the relaxation dynamics of dynamic limit, and that it decouples from the relaxation athermal frictionless soft spheres below jamming using time at large N. This implies that η ∼ τ in Eq. (1) extensive numerical simulations to directly test Eq. (1) breaks down. and investigate the existence and numerical value of β We compare ηp and τ much closer to jamming for φ = across different dimensions from d = 2 to d = ∞. 0.83 in Fig.7(b). In the regime of system sizes where We discovered that the relaxation dynamics of un- the shear rheology can be analysed, the two quantities jammed packings close but below jamming is controlled appear strongly coupled. For the largest N value, we see by a large correlation lengthscale, ξ(φ), which diverges a hint that τ enters the logarithmic regime whereas ηp very fast as the jamming transition is approached. This saturates to its large-N limiting value, but this is difficult finding, associated with the observation that two very to see (despite the large system sizes studied). different types of initial conditions yield similar results The physical interpretation of these results is that in suggest that the dynamical slowing down approaching the regime where ξforce ∼ L, the coupling between viscos- the jamming transition from below is largely universal. ity and relaxation dynamics is strong and both quantities We expect that qualitatively similar results would be ob- behave similarly. On the other hand, when ξforce L, tained using different types of local dynamics. Our re- they become decoupled with τ(N) ∼ log N whereas ηp sults suggest that only collective algorithms relying on a saturates to a constant value. For a given volume fraction detailed analysis of the microstructure of the force net- φ, the decoupling thus occurs when L > ξ(φ), where ξ(φ) work could change the value of the dynamic critical ex- is the correlation length mentioned in Sec.IVB above, ponents. and discussed further in Sec.VI. For system sizes L < ξ(φ), the relaxation time, softest The decoupling at large N can be understood in- mode and shear viscosity are strongly coupled because tuitively on the basis of the snapshots shown in the force field is correlated over the entire system and all Fig.4, which show the emergence of independent islands these probes are physically equivalent. However, in this where the forces are large in unjammed configurations. regime, all quantities are strongly affected by finite-size Whereas the relaxation time is always dominated by the effects. slowest of these multiple islands in each configuration, In the other regime L > ξ(φ), the relaxation time the viscosity presumably results from an ensemble aver- and softest mode do not converge in the thermodynamic age over all correlated domains. If the probability dis- limit, because the system breaks into independently re- tribution of the local viscosity is well-behaved, its first laxing domains, and the relaxation time is dominated by moment has no reason to diverge in the thermodynamic the slowest region of the entire system. An extreme-value limit. argument then explains its logarithmic divergence with 10
trolling the two different regimes for the relaxation dy- namics and shear rheology? The snapshots of the force field in Fig.4 suggest that the microstructure of the sys- tem is very uniform when L < ξ(φ), and strongly het- erogeneous when L > ξ(φ). The contact number z also fluctuates spatially in unjammed packings, between re- gions that are highly connected and regions that are less connected. In Fig.8, we compare the coarse-grained fields of the forces and of the contact number fluctua- tions, δz(r) = z(r)−hzi, where hzi represents an average over the final configuration. This comparison confirms the intuition that the regions that are more connected are also the regions where the forces between particles are larger, and that the islands controlling the relax- FIG. 8. Coarse-grained fields of (a) the amplitude of forces ation dynamics correspond to the well-connected regions. and (b) contact number fluctuations for φ = 0.7 and N = Recently, the spatial fluctuations of the contact number 262144. In (b), regions with negative z(x, y) − hzi are shown have been analysed numerically [20, 21]. Combining our in black. results with this recent analysis suggests to identify ξ(φ) with the correlation length of the contact number field. Numerically, a power law ξ ∼ (∆z)−ν was measured, system size, τ(N) ∼ log N. In this regime, the exponent with ν ' 0.7 (d = 2) and ν ' 0.85 (d = 3). This could β only applies to the shear viscosity which is then devoid also be consistent with a very recent study [30] discussing of finite-size effects but this requires prohibitively large the existence of a diverging length scale controlling the systems near jamming, making a precise determination shear rheology of unjammed spheres, with a critical ex- of β very difficult, even in d = 2. ponent close to ν = 1. As reviewed in Ref. [30], the zoo of The analysis of the mean-field Mari-Kurchan model critical lengthscales near jamming is populated by many suggests that the value β ' 3.3 should describe the large- beasts, and it would be useful to provide a firmer theo- d limit. One may conjecture that this exponent describes retical basis for the correlation length ξ(φ) that controls the shear viscosity in any physical dimensions d ≥ 2 in the dynamics of unjammed packings. analogy with other jamming exponents. Due to the large A final puzzle is the logarithmic increase of the force- finite-size effects mentioned above, we can neither rule force correlation length ξforce in the regime L > ξ(φ), out nor support this conjecture for the moment by direct which appears incompatible, at first sight, with the mul- numerical measurements. tiple island picture given by the snapshots of the force Because of the mean-field nature of the MK model, we field. Since the force-force correlation function Eq. (5) expect that the mean-field dynamic exponent β ' 3.3 can is computed as an average over all particles, the correla- be determined by analytic developments. Indeed, the- tion length ξforce should indeed quantify the typical size oretical arguments developed for the sheared case give of the islands. However, the amplitude of the forces in a quantitatively similar value β ' 3.41 [39]. In order final configurations vary over orders of magnitude from to directly compare these two exponents, we need to one region to another, and we believe that here again study either the MK model under steady shear, or ex- the island with the largest forces in fact dominates the tend the theoretical argument to the isotropic case. The correlation function. The weak growth of the correlation former is difficult because the random shifts couple parti- length ξforce in Fig.5(b) thus presumably results from a cles that are spatially separated from each other by large similar extreme-value mechanism as for the logarithmic distances, and a uniform shear flow is difficult to realize growth of the relaxation time. in the MK model. The latter seems more promising. We remark that Ref. [40] recently proposed a variational ar- gument for the dynamic exponent in the isotropic case ACKNOWLEDGMENTS which gives the same result as Ref. [38], which is an ear- lier version of Ref. [39]. We hope that our work will guide We are grateful to M. Cates, H. Ikeda, P Olsson, and inform further analytic developments. Indeed, since M. Wyart, and F. Zamponi for useful discussions. This the initial submission of our manuscript, Ikeda [37] has work was supported by a grant from the Simons Foun- obtained the same prediction β = 3.41 for the isotropic dation (Grant No. 454933, L. B.) and JSPS KAK- case. ENHI grants (No. 18H05225, 19H01812, 20H01868, and What is the nature of the correlation length ξ(φ) con- 20H00128, A. I.).
[1] A. J. Liu and S. R. Nagel, Nature 396, 21 (1998). [2] C. S. O’Hern, S. A. Langer, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, 11
Physical Review Letters 88, 075507 (2002). National Academy of Sciences 109, 4798 (2012). [3] C. S. O’Hern, L. E. Silbert, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, [28] P. Olsson and S. Teitel, Physical Review E 83, 030302 Physical Review E 68, 011306 (2003). (2011). [4] C. P. Goodrich, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Physical [29] T. Kawasaki, D. Coslovich, A. Ikeda, and L. Berthier, Review Letters 109, 095704 (2012). Physical Review E 91, 012203 (2015). [5] M. Wyart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 125502 (2012). [30] P. Olsson and S. Teitel, (2020), arXiv:2004.09311 [cond- [6] P. Charbonneau, E. I. Corwin, G. Parisi, and F. Zam- mat.soft]. poni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 205501 (2012). [31] D. J. Durian, Physical Review Letters 75, 4780 (1995). [7] E. Lerner, G. During, and M. Wyart, Soft Matter 9, [32] T. Hatano, Phys. Rev. E 79, 050301 (2009). 8252 (2013). [33] P. Olsson, Physical Review E 91, 062209 (2015). [8] P. Charbonneau, E. I. Corwin, G. Parisi, and F. Zam- [34] P. Olsson, Physical Review Letters 122, 108003 (2019), poni, Physical Review Letters 114, 125504 (2015). 1809.07971. [9] M. Wyart, L. E. Silbert, S. R. Nagel, and T. A. Witten, [35] A. Ikeda, T. Kawasaki, L. Berthier, K. Saitoh, and Physical Review E 72, 051306 (2005). T. Hatano, Physical Review Letters 124, 058001 (2020). [10] P. Charbonneau, J. Kurchan, G. Parisi, P. Urbani, and [36] K. Saitoh, T. Hatano, A. Ikeda, and B. P. Tighe, Phys. F. Zamponi, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory Rev. Lett. 124, 118001 (2020). and Experiment 2014, P10009 (2014). [37] H. Ikeda, arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.11166 (2020). [11] E. DeGiuli, E. Lerner, C. Brito, and M. Wyart, Pro- [38] E. Lerner, G. D¨uring,and M. Wyart, EPL (Europhysics ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 17054 Letters) 99, 58003 (2012). (2014). [39] E. DeGiuli, G. D¨uring,E. Lerner, and M. Wyart, Phys- [12] C. Heussinger and J.-L. Barrat, Physical Review Letters ical Review E 91, 062206 (2015). 102, 218303 (2009). [40] S. Hwang and H. Ikeda, Physical Review E 101, 052308 [13] C. Heussinger, L. Berthier, and J.-L. Barrat, EPL (Eu- (2020). rophysics Letters) 90, 20005 (2010), 1001.0914. [41] K. N. Nordstrom, E. Verneuil, P. E. Arratia, A. Basu, [14] B. Andreotti, J.-L. Barrat, and C. Heussinger, Physical Z. Zhang, A. G. Yodh, J. P. Gollub, and D. J. Durian, Review Letters 109, 105901 (2012). Physical Review Letters 105, 175701 (2010). [15] A. Ikeda, L. Berthier, and G. Biroli, The Journal of [42] R. H. Kraichnan, Journal of Mathematical Physics 3, 475 Chemical Physics 138, 12A507 (2013). (1962). [16] A. Ikeda, L. Berthier, and P. Sollich, Soft Matter 9, 7669 [43] R. Mari, F. Krz¸akala, and J. Kurchan, Physical Review (2013). Letters 103, 025701 (2009). [17] D. V˚agberg, P. Olsson, and S. Teitel, Physical Review [44] R. Mari and J. Kurchan, The Journal of chemical physics Letters 112, 208303 (2014). 135, 124504 (2011). [18] M. Trulsson, M. Bouzid, J. Kurchan, E. Cl´ement, [45] P. Charbonneau, Y. Jin, G. Parisi, and F. Zamponi, P. Claudin, and B. Andreotti, EPL (Europhysics Let- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, ters) 111, 18001 (2015). 15025 (2014), arXiv:1407.5677. [19] S. Atkinson, G. Zhang, A. B. Hopkins, and S. Torquato, [46] A. W. Lees and S. F. Edwards, Journal of Physics C: Physical Review E 94, 012902 (2016). Solid State Physics 5, 1921 (1972). [20] D. Hexner, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Physical Review [47] D. V˚agberg, D. Valdez-Balderas, M. A. Moore, P. Olsson, Letters 121, 115501 (2018). and S. Teitel, Physical Review E 83, 030303 (2011). [21] D. Hexner, P. Urbani, and F. Zamponi, Physical Review [48] J. D. Sartor, S. A. Ridout, and E. I. Corwin, (2020), Letters 123, 068003 (2019). arXiv:2006.09592 [cond-mat.soft]. [22] F. Arceri and E. I. Corwin, Physical Review Letters 124, [49] N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Physical Review Letters 238002 (2020). 17, 1133 (1966). [23] P. Olsson and S. Teitel, Physical Review Letters 99, [50] T. Shen, C. S. O’Hern, and M. D. Shattuck, Physical 178001 (2007). Review E 85, 011308 (2012). [24] J. Mewis and N. J. Wagner, Colloidal suspension rheology [51] F. Bardou, J.-P. Bouchaud, A. Aspect, and C. Cohen- (Cambridge University Press, 2012). Tannoudji, L´evy Statistics and Laser Cooling: How [25] Y. Forterre and O. Pouliquen, Annual Review of Fluid Rare Events Bring Atoms to Rest (Cambridge Univer- Mechanics 40, 1 (2008). sity Press, 2001). [26] F. Boyer, E.´ Guazzelli, and O. Pouliquen, Physical Re- [52] J. Y. Fortin and M. Clusel, Journal of Physics A: Math- view Letters 107, 188301 (2011). ematical and Theoretical 48, 1 (2015). [27] E. Lerner, G. D¨uring,and M. Wyart, Proceedings of the