Masculinity in American Television from Carter to Clinton Bridget Kies University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Masculinity in American Television from Carter to Clinton Bridget Kies University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations May 2018 Masculinity in American Television from Carter to Clinton Bridget Kies University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Film and Media Studies Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, and the Mass Communication Commons Recommended Citation Kies, Bridget, "Masculinity in American Television from Carter to Clinton" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 1844. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1844 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MASCULINITY IN AMERICAN TELEVISION FROM CARTER TO CLINTON by Bridget Kies A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English at The University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee May 2018 ABSTRACT MASCULINITY IN AMERICAN TELEVISION FROM CARTER TO CLINTON by Bridget Kies The University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, 2018 Under the Supervision of Professor Tasha Oren This dissertation examines American television during a period I call the long 1980s. I argue that during this period, television became invested in new and provocative images of masculinity on screen and in networks’ attempts to court audiences of men. I have demarcated the beginning and ending of the long 1980s with the declaration of Jimmy Carter as Time magazine’s Man of the Year in 1977 and Bill Clinton’s inauguration in 1993. This also correlates with important shifts in the television industry, such as the formation of ESP-TV (later ESPN) in 1979 and the end of Johnny Carson’s tenure as host of The Tonight Show on NBC in 1992. During this period, seemingly dichotomous images of masculinity were present in American politics and culture: the “new man” embodied by Jimmy Carter, who is sympathetic and supportive of the women’s movement, and the cowboy ethos embodied by Ronald Reagan, which favors a more traditionally patriarchal social order. On television, these dueling masculinities were depicted in sitcoms, dramas, late-night comedy shows, and sports programming. Although much of 1980s television scholarship has unearthed network and programming strategies that favored women as audiences, I demonstrate how the formation of niche cable networks and changes to traditional television genres like the action series ii aggressively targeted male audiences. Masculinity on television in the long 1980s was therefore not limited to changes in representations on screen but extended to technological and industrial concerns as well. By the end of the long 1980s, these developments had the effect of increasing possibilities for queer viewing practices. As television is an intrinsically domestic medium, this also meant a challenge to expectations for American masculinities. The connection between domesticity and masculinity encouraged more flexible identities at time when gender roles in American culture were swiftly changing. Through industrial practices, representations of “new men” on screen, genre shifts, and home viewing technologies, television in the 1980s became masculinized, but that masculinization was a move away from an aggressive patriarchy and toward a queer domesticity. iii © Copyright by Bridget Kies, 2018 All Rights Reserved iv TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Abstract .............................................................................................................................. ii List of Figures .................................................................................................................. vii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER I. Introduction: Television and Icons of Masculinity in the Long 1980s .............................. 1 Technological, Industrial, and Audience Changes ................................................... 5 The American President as a Symbol of Masculinity ............................................... 8 The New Man and the Cowboy in Popular Culture ................................................ 17 Changing Masculinities on Television.................................................................... 22 II. Pitying Fools: Gender and Genre in 1980s Drama Series ............................................... 29 Serialized Storytelling on Primetime ...................................................................... 32 Combining Melodrama and Masculinity: Parodies in the Long 1980s .................. 38 Primetime Serials: Women’s Stories in Men’s Worlds .......................................... 44 Action, Adventure, and Emotions: Men’s Genres .................................................. 49 Heroes with Hearts and Brains: Casting and Character Development ................... 50 The “Cumulative Narrative” and Men’s Evolution ................................................ 60 Men’s Bodies: Subverting the Jiggle Era on Primetime ......................................... 69 Cooperation, Not Competition: Positioning the New Hero .................................... 75 Money, Class, and Masculinity ............................................................................... 80 Conclusion: New Directions for Gender and Genre ............................................... 85 III. Television’s “Mr. Moms”: Idealizing the New Man in 1980s Domestic Sitcoms .......... 95 Sitcoms and Evolving Images of Family 100 Participant Fathers: At the Center of the Family Circle ....................................... 110 Domestic Dads: Masculinizing Domestic Labor or Feminizing Men? ................ 120 Lead Dads and Helper Dads: Manning the Alternative Family ............................ 134 “A New Boy in the Neighborhood Lives Downstairs”: Sitcom Sets and Physical Proximity as Indications of Familial Intimacy...................................................... 145 Conclusion: The New Family Values ................................................................... 148 IV. “Girlie Men”: Late-Night Comedy, Gender, and Humor Across Ideological Lines ..... 158 Competing with Carson ........................................................................................ 162 Cautionary Tales of Women in Comedy .............................................................. 171 “If I get drafted, who’s going to be the token black on Saturday Night Live?”.... 178 “Girlie Man”: Challenging Masculinities through Virtuosic Performances ......... 189 Cross-Media Strategies: Growing the Late-Night Audience ............................... 200 Conclusion: Late-Night Clashes with Politics ...................................................... 206 V. “For Men Only”: Sports, Video, and Private Viewing .................................................. 218 The VCR and VHS: Television When You Want It ............................................. 222 v From “Porno Chic” in Public to Private Home Video .......................................... 230 Sports, Liveness, and Access ................................................................................ 238 Conclusion: Sports and Video as the Embodiment of Americanism .................... 249 VI. Conclusion: The End of the Long 1980s?...................................................................... 264 Trump TV: The Performativity and Fragility of Masculinity ............................... 269 Reviving and Rebooting the Long 1980s.............................................................. 272 Fuller House: A Case Study in Nostalgia for the Long 1980s ............................. 274 Conclusion: The Legacy of the Long 1980s ......................................................... 277 VII. References ...................................................................................................................... 281 VIII. Appendix: List of Films and Television Series.............................................................. 305 IX. Curriculum Vitae ........................................................................................................... 312 vi LIST OF FIGURES 1.1 Reagan’s 1984 “Morning in America” campaign ad ............................................................ 3 1.2 Jimmy Carter as Time’s 1977 Man of the Year .................................................................. 10 1.3 Burt Reynolds in Cosmopolitan, 1972 ................................................................................ 20 1.4 Arnold Schwarznegger in Cosmopolitan, 1977 .................................................................. 21 2.1 Peter Campbell (Robert Urich) is seen in a post-coital nap. ............................................... 42 2.2 Cover of Soap Opera Digest, February 1978 ..................................................................... 52 2.3 Opening credits to Mr. T, the animated series .................................................................... 59 3.1 Jack (Michael Keaton) and his son are terrorized by the vacuum in Mr. Mom .................. 96 3.2 Opening credits to Who’s the Boss ..................................................................................... 99 3.3 Fall 1987 primetime schedule ........................................................................................... 107 3.4 Father and son reconcile their differences as equals on Family Ties ...............................
Recommended publications
  • Partisan Balance with Bite
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2018 Partisan Balance with Bite Daniel Hemel Brian D. Feinstein Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Daniel Hemel & Brian Feinstein, "Partisan Balance with Bite," 118 Columbia Law Review 9 (2018). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW VOL. 118 JANUARY 2018 NO. 1 ARTICLE PARTISAN BALANCE WITH BITE Brian D. Feinstein* & Daniel J. Hemel** Dozens of multimember agencies across the federal government are subject to partisan balance requirements, which mandate that no more than a simple majority of agency members may hail from a single party. Administrative law scholars and political scientists have questioned whether these provisions meaningfully affect the ideological composition of federal agencies. In theory, Presidents can comply with these require- ments by appointing ideologically sympathetic members of the opposite party once they have filled their quota of same-party appointees (i.e., a Democratic President can appoint liberal Republicans or a Republican President can appoint conservative Democrats). No multiagency study in the past fifty years, however, has examined whether—in practice— partisan balance requirements actually prevent Presidents from selecting like-minded individuals for cross-party appointments. This Article fills that gap. We gather data on 578 appointees to twenty-three agencies over the course of six presidencies and thirty-six years.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    THE TELEVISED SOUTH: AN ANALYSIS OF THE DOMINANT READINGS OF SELECT PRIME-TIME PROGRAMS FROM THE REGION By COLIN PATRICK KEARNEY A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2020 © 2020 Colin P. Kearney To my family ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A Doctor of Philosophy signals another rite of passage in a career of educational learning. With that thought in mind, I must first thank the individuals who made this rite possible. Over the past 23 years, I have been most fortunate to be a student of the following teachers: Lori Hocker, Linda Franke, Dandridge Penick, Vickie Hickman, Amy Henson, Karen Hull, Sonya Cauley, Eileen Head, Anice Machado, Teresa Torrence, Rosemary Powell, Becky Hill, Nellie Reynolds, Mike Gibson, Jane Mortenson, Nancy Badertscher, Susan Harvey, Julie Lipscomb, Linda Wood, Kim Pollock, Elizabeth Hellmuth, Vicki Black, Jeff Melton, Daniel DeVier, Rusty Ford, Bryan Tolley, Jennifer Hall, Casey Wineman, Elaine Shanks, Paulette Morant, Cat Tobin, Brian Freeland, Cindy Jones, Lee McLaughlin, Phyllis Parker, Sue Seaman, Amanda Evans, David Smith, Greer Stene, Davina Copsy, Brian Baker, Laura Shull, Elizabeth Ramsey, Joann Blouin, Linda Fort, Judah Brownstein, Beth Lollis, Dennis Moore, Nathan Unroe, Bob Csongei, Troy Bogino, Christine Haynes, Rebecca Scales, Robert Sims, Ian Ward, Emily Watson-Adams, Marek Sojka, Paula Nadler, Marlene Cohen, Sheryl Friedley, James Gardner, Peter Becker, Rebecca Ericsson,
    [Show full text]
  • George HW Bush and CHIREP at the UN 1970-1971
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Spring 5-22-2020 The First Cut is the Deepest: George H.W. Bush and CHIREP at the U.N. 1970-1971 James W. Weber Jr. University of New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Part of the American Popular Culture Commons, Asian History Commons, Cultural History Commons, Diplomatic History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Weber, James W. Jr., "The First Cut is the Deepest: George H.W. Bush and CHIREP at the U.N. 1970-1971" (2020). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 2756. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/2756 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The First Cut is the Deepest : George H.W. Bush and CHIREP at the U.N. 1970–1971 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History by James W.
    [Show full text]
  • Why YOU Should Be an English Major
    Why YOU should be an English Major You’ll be able to communicate your ideas effectively. This is what employers want the most – people who can communicate clearly. Impress your employer with your ability to communicate, and you’ll get promoted. You’ll also sound smarter than everybody else. You’ll be able to learn new tasks and ideas. A liberal arts education teaches you how to learn, not how to do a specific job. Your employer will provide on-the-job training. Besides, the hot jobs of 20 years from now haven’t even been thought of yet; major in English, learn how to learn new job skills, and stay employed. You’ll be prepared for med school, law school, business school… Being an English major teaches you how to think critically. Graduate schools in every field are more interested in your ability to analyze situations and make connections between concepts than in your ability to memorize lists. You’ll get a good job. Major scientific, technological, industrial, and financial companies like to hire English majors. They want employees who can analyze problems, think up creative answers, and communicate those answers to coworkers. And an English degree teaches you to do all these things. You’ll earn lots of money. Well, maybe not as much as science graduates, but the 201 201 Payscale College Salary Report listed salaries for popular careers for English majors that ranged from $ to $ . 5- 6 40,000 76,000 You’ll move up the company ladder. Your English major taught you how to analyze problems, think creatively, synthesize intelligent solutions, and communicate those solutions to your bosses and coworkers.
    [Show full text]
  • Picking the Vice President
    Picking the Vice President Elaine C. Kamarck Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C. Contents Introduction 4 1 The Balancing Model 6 The Vice Presidency as an “Arranged Marriage” 2 Breaking the Mold 14 From Arranged Marriages to Love Matches 3 The Partnership Model in Action 20 Al Gore Dick Cheney Joe Biden 4 Conclusion 33 Copyright 36 Introduction Throughout history, the vice president has been a pretty forlorn character, not unlike the fictional vice president Julia Louis-Dreyfus plays in the HBO seriesVEEP . In the first episode, Vice President Selina Meyer keeps asking her secretary whether the president has called. He hasn’t. She then walks into a U.S. senator’s office and asks of her old colleague, “What have I been missing here?” Without looking up from her computer, the senator responds, “Power.” Until recently, vice presidents were not very interesting nor was the relationship between presidents and their vice presidents very consequential—and for good reason. Historically, vice presidents have been understudies, have often been disliked or even despised by the president they served, and have been used by political parties, derided by journalists, and ridiculed by the public. The job of vice president has been so peripheral that VPs themselves have even made fun of the office. That’s because from the beginning of the nineteenth century until the last decade of the twentieth century, most vice presidents were chosen to “balance” the ticket. The balance in question could be geographic—a northern presidential candidate like John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts picked a southerner like Lyndon B.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON's RESPONSE to the LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an Examination
    ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an examination of gender, politics, and media during the time of the Lewinsky scandal, this project shows that conversations about the first lady shifted throughout 1998. Just after the allegations were made public, the press and American people fought against the forthright position that Hillary took; the expectations of traditional first ladies they had known before were not met. After facing backlash via the press, the first lady receded to more acceptably defined notions of her actions, based largely in late 20th century conservative definitions of appropriate gender roles. By the end of 1998, consideration of a run for the Senate and increased public support for her more traditional image provided a compromise for Hillary Rodham Clinton’s public image. Having finally met the expectations of the nation, the press spoke less of the first lady in comparison to family values and almost exclusively by means of her political abilities. POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Department of History by Kelsey Snyder Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2015 Advisor __________________________________________ Kimberly Hamlin Reader ___________________________________________ Marguerite Shaffer Reader ___________________________________________ Monica Schneider TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • NATPE 2013 Tuesday, January 29, 2013 Click For
    join the family this fall 20TH TV 3376 BRIAN S. TOP HAT BANNER MECHANICAL BUILT AT 100% MECH@ 100% 9.875" X 1.25" 9.625"W X 1"H SHOW DAILY NATPE • MIAMI BEACH TUESDAY, JANUARY 29, 2013 CONTENT INDUSTRY client and prod special info: # job# artist issue/ time pub post date (est) insert/ line Sinead Harte size air date screen 323-963-5199 ext 220 CHANGE 8240 Sunset Blvd CREATES bleed trim live Los Angeles, CA 90046 DEBATEBY ANDREA FREYGANG CERTAINBY CHARLOTTE LIBOV ideo might have killed ra - dio, as the first song aired on echnology is changing view- VMTV implied, but not every- ing habits and the TV industry one is certain that the internet is Tmust keep pace by reinventing going to cause TV’s demise. In itself, much as music industry did the opening session of NATPE, in the wake of the seismic changes as panelists debated the impact that nearly destroyed that indus- of social media and the internet try, observed David Pakman, who on the TV industry, audience re- led the opening panelA-004 at NATPE 1537F CHRISTINA SCHIERMANN PHOTO BY ALEX MATTEO BY PHOTO 1/4"=1' action was mixed. on Monday. Game changing or not? That was the topic under consideration Monday when a keynote panel of LAX FLIGHT PATH 9.01.08 N/A 4c “I think Facebook is a better experts voiced opinions about the impact of digital distribution. Among those weighing in were, In answer to the question competitor to TV than YouTube. from left to right, Kevin Beggs, Lionsgate Television Group president; TheBlaze’s Betsy Morgan, Will Disruption Choke250' the w TeleviX 65'- h 9.18.08 SUNDAY 150 It’s a very interesting debate president & chief strategy officer; and Aereo’s Chet Kanojia, founder and CEO sion Business Models?,68.75" the Xpanel 17.875" 62.5" X 16.25" ALL to have,” said Fiona Dawson, a SEE CHANGE, P.
    [Show full text]
  • President William J. Clinton
    President William J. Clinton RECIPIENT OF THE 2005 JIMMY AND ROSALYNN CARTER AWARD FOR HUMANITARIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HEALTH OF HUMANKIND ill Clinton has been committed to story. HIV infects forty million people worldwide. battling the HIV/AIDS epidemic, Twenty-five million have died. In many places even before he was elected the epidemic is undermining social, economic, President. As a candidate in 1991, he and political stability. Many countries lack both repeatedly called for all-out efforts funds and the public health infrastructure Bto “turn back the tide of AIDS.” needed to implement effective prevention, care, Since leaving the White House, President and treatment to turn the tide. In response to this Clinton has continued his efforts to combat aids, challenge, President Clinton has made the focusing on bringing large-scale care and HIV/AIDS Initiative a focal point of the William treatment programs to developing countries. The Jefferson Clinton Foundation: “Science has Clinton Foundation HIV/ AIDS Initiative, established in 2002, has become a major player in the global effort to expand access to care and treatment in the developing world. In acknowledgement of this work, Bill Clinton has been named this year’s recipient of The Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter Award for provided us with the knowledge and tools we Humanitarian Contributions to the Health of need to turn the tide of this pandemic. It is time Humankind. for us as political leaders and citizens to put During his administration, President Clinton them to use. Lives that could be spared will be pushed for increased funding for AIDS research lost and it will be impossible for these countries and speedier Food and Drug Administration to achieve their goals for social and economic approval of AIDS drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Balz, It’S Been a Great Hour and a Half, Thank You So Much for This
    The Election of 2004 – Collective Memory Project Interviewee: Dan Balz Chief Correspondent at The Washington Post In 2004 – National Political Correspondent for The Washington Post Interviewer: Dr. Michael Nelson Fulmer Professor of Political Science Rhodes College January 6, 2014 Disclaimer: This transcription has been prepared according to the strictest practices of the academic and transcription communities and offers our best good-faith effort at reproducing in text our subject's spoken words. In all cases, however, the video of this interview represents the definitive version of the words spoken by interviewees. Q: Dan, you’ve been covering campaigns for president since when? BALZ: Nineteen eighty is really when I started, although I was the political editor at the Post for the ’80 campaign, so I was more in the newsroom than out. But I’ve been doing them ever since. Q: Eighty-four, ’88? BALZ: Eighty-four, ’88, again, I was an editor that year, and then from ’92 forward, purely as a reporter. Q: I might ask you, what’s the difference in perspective you have from being an editor, and being out there in the field? BALZ: Well, there’s no substitute for being out there in the field, (laughter) I think, is the simplest way to put it. I mean, when you’re an editor, you know, you’re obviously thinking about the coverage, kind of, in its totality, and part of it is a logistical exercise, just making sure your reporters are in the right places, that the coverage is looking at all aspects of the campaign at any given moment.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Carleton University Early Summer 2017 Department of English ENGL 4115A Culture and the Text / 5900R Selected Topic in English
    1 Carleton University Early Summer 2017 Department of English ENGL 4115A Culture and the Text / 5900R Selected Topic in English Studies I Melodrama and Seriality: Soap Operas, Superheroes, and Literature Tues, Thurs /11:35am – 2:25pm Location: 3400 Canal Building Instructor: Brian Johnson Email: [email protected] Office: Dunton Tower 1818 Phone: 613-520-2600 ext. 2331 Hours: By Appointment Melodramatic narratives are driven by the experience of one crisis after another, crises involving severed family ties, separation and loss, misrecognition of one’s place, person, and propriety. Seduction, betrayal, abandonment, extortion, murder, suicide, revenge, jealousy, incurable illness, obsession, and compulsion—these are part of the familiar terrain of melodrama. —Marcia Landry What draws us to melodrama as a narrative mode? Why do we seem to find the emotional trials and life-or-death calamities besetting longsuffering soap heroines, superheroes, and postapocalyptic zombie survivalists so endlessly enthralling? At what point does melodrama become camp? And conversely, what distinguishes “low” genres like melodrama from “high” genres like the novel? What do these convulsive narratives, which focus so obsessively on the Freudian hothouse of the bourgeois family, have to tell us about our private but also our collective social pleasures, perversions, and aspirations? What does it mean that readers and viewers return again and again to the site of crisis in search of narrative pleasure? This course explores the poetics and politics of melodrama
    [Show full text]
  • Proverbs Are the Best Policy
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All USU Press Publications USU Press 2005 Proverbs are the Best Policy Wolfgang Mieder Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Mieder, W. (2005). Proverbs are the best policy: Folk wisdom and American politics. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the USU Press at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All USU Press Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wolfgang Mieder Proverbs are the Best Policy Folk Wisdom and American Politics Proverbs Are the Best Policy Proverbs Are the Best Policy Folk Wisdom and American Politics Wolfgang Mieder Utah State University Press Logan, Utah Copyright © 2005 Utah State University Press All rights reserved Utah State University Press Logan, Utah 84322–7800 www.usu.edu/usupress/ Manufactured in the United States of America Printed on acid-free paper Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mieder, Wolfgang. Proverbs are the best policy : folk wisdom and American politics / Wolfgang Mieder. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and indexes. ISBN-13: 978-0-87421-622-6 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-87421-622-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. United States--Politics and government--Miscellanea. 2. United States--Politics and government--Quotations, maxims, etc. 3. Proverbs, American. 4. Proverbs--Political aspects--United States. 5. Rhetoric --Political aspects--United States. 6. Politicians--United States --Language. I. Title. E183.M54 2005 398.9’21’0973--dc22 2005018275 Dedicated to PATRICK LEAHY and JIM JEFFORDS U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A House Divided
    Football team makes playoffs page 10 mt. lebanon high school • 155 cochran road volume 54• October 30, 2020 • issue 2 the Devil’s Advocate the student voice of Mt. Lebanon High School A House Divided 2020 election reveals generation gap jack horrigan & kendall lankford proximity to the election,” McClinchie really discuss politics when my siblings in hard facts and information. But po- editors-in-chief said. “Also, I have noticed that every- and I are bold enough to bring them up litically, I don’t think I could ever switch one’s views are super polarized nowa- or when something major happens, like them.” the debates. Other than that, we tend to Like many politically active youth, As we inch closer and closer to one of in my family, and I’m interested to see Hendrick was drawn into politics after the most important elections in Amer- how this plays out after the election.” McClinchie believes that most of the the 2016 election. Social justice issues ican history, some families are inching days. This has definitely caused conflict Political discussions are not uncom- - closer and closer to some of the deep- avoid it to avoid the conflict altogether.” mon during this time, and McClinchie es in belief, but also in the gap between development. est belief-based divisions seen to date. believes that this particular political generations, in that nowadays it is easi- “It wasn’t necessarily my parents, With the polarization of politics conflict stems not only from differenc especially influenced her ideological climate is contributing to the fact that er to form an opinion for yourself.
    [Show full text]