DOCSLIB.ORG

The US in South Korea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The US in South Korea THE U.S. IN SOUTH KOREA: ALLY OR EMPIRE? PERSPECTIVES IN GEOPOLITICS GRADE: 9-12 AUTHOR: Sharlyn Scott TOPIC/THEME: Social Studies TIME REQUIRED: Four to five 55-minute class periods BACKGROUND: This lesson examines different perspectives on the relationship between the U.S. and the Republic of Korea (R.O.K. – South Korea) historically and today. Is the United States military presence a benevolent force protecting both South Korean and American interests in East Asia? Or is the U.S. a domineering empire using the hard power of its military in South Korea solely to achieve its own geopolitical goals in the region and the world? Are there issues between the ROK and the U.S. that can be resolved for mutually beneficial results? An overview of the history of U.S. involvement in Korea since the end of World War II will be studied for context in examining these questions. In addition, current academic and newspaper articles as well as op-ed pieces by controversial yet reliable sources will offer insight into both American and South Korean perspectives. These perspectives will be analyzed as students grapple with important geopolitical questions involving the relationship between the U.S. and the R.O.K. CURRICULUM CONNECTION: This unit could be used with regional Geography class, World History, as well as American History as it relates to the Korean War and/or U.S. military expansion OBJECTIVES AND STANDARDS: The student will be able to: 1. Comprehend the historical relationship of the U.S. and the Korean Peninsula 2. Demonstrate both the U.S. and South Korean perspectives on U.S. military presence and involvement in the Korean Peninsula 3. Analyze multiple perspectives on the same geopolitical issues and work together for common solutions Applicable National Social Studies Standards: 1. Historical Thinking Standard 3: The student engages in historical analysis and interpretation: Therefore, the student is able to: Compare and contrast differing sets of ideas, values, personalities, behaviors, and institutions by identifying likenesses and differences. Consider multiple perspectives of various peoples in the past by demonstrating their differing motives, beliefs, interests, hopes, and fears. 2. World History Era 9: The 20th Century Since 1945: Promises and Paradoxes Standard 1: How post-World War II reconstruction occurred, new international power relations took shape, and colonial empires broke up. 1 Standard 2: The search for community, stability, and peace in an interdependent world Standard 3: Major global trends since World War II Common Core Standards: WHST 1 Write arguments focused on discipline-specific content 1a Introduce precise claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims 1b. Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly, supplying data and evidence for each WHST 4 Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience SL 1 Initiate and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussion SL 3 Evaluate a speaker’s point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence SL 4 Present information, findings and supporting evidence clearly, concisely and logically RH 1 Cites specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources RH 2 Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source RH 6 Compare the point of view of two or more authors for how they treat the same or similar topics MATERIALS REQUIRED: 1. Document 1: Background Reading from the Council on Foreign Relations “The U.S.- South Korea Alliance” by Youkyung Lee (attached) and http://www.cfr.org/south- korea/us-south-korea-alliance/p11459 2. 2.Document 2: Background Geographic Information on the Republic of Korea (attached) and http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2800.htm 3. Document 3: Map of U.S. Military Bases in the Republic of Korea (attached) and http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/images/korea2.jpg 4. Document 4: South Korean Perspective Group Worksheet (attached) which has discussion questions to guide students as they analyze readings related to the South Korean perspective on issues with the U.S.-R.O.K. relationship 5. Document 5: U.S. Perspective Group Worksheet (attached) which has discussion questions to guide students as they analyze readings related to the American perspective on issues with the U.S.-R.O.K. relationship. 6. Document 6: Common U.S.-R.O.K. Solutions Group Worksheet (attached) which has discussion questions to guide students to developing common goals and resolutions for the U.S.-R.O.K. relationship 7. Document 7: “Anti-Base Movements in South Korea: Comparative Perspective on the Asia-Pacific” from Foreign Policy in Focus by Andrew Yeo at http://www.fpif.org/articles/anti-base_movements_in_south_korea 8. Document 8: “South Korea-U.S. Relations” from Asian Perspective by Katharine Moon at www.wellesley.edu/Polisci/KMoon/asianperspective.pdf or www.wellesley.edu/Polisci/KMoon/uskorea.html 9. Document 9: “Unwanted Missiles for a Korean Island” from The New York Times op-ed contributor Christine Ahn at http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/06/opinion/06iht- edahn06.html?_r=2 2 10. Document 10: “Emotion is Not the Problem: The U.S.-R.O.K. Relationship in Perspective” from The Korea Society by David Kang at http://www.koreasociety.org/policy/policy/emotion_is_not_the_problem_the_u.s.- rok_relationship_in_perspective.html 11. Document 11: “U.S. Presence Necessary for Korean Security” (Sept. 16, 2010) by Sgt. 1st Class Michael J. Carden in www.army.mil at http://www.army.mil/article/45317/us- presence-necessary-for-korean-security-officials-say/ 12. Document 12: “Why Korea Needs South Korea Base” from The Diplomat an op-ed by Richard Weitz at http://the-diplomat.com/2011/08/21/why-us-needs-south-korea-base/ INTRODUCTION AND EXPLORATION: 1. Background – session one, may also be assigned as homework: i. Together as a class read and discuss the background reading “The U.S.- South Korea Alliance” by Youkyung Lee. (Document 1) ii. Students will read the Background Geographic Information on the Republic of Korea from the U.S. State Department. (Document 2) iii. Students will examine the Map of U.S. Military Bases in the Republic of Korea. (Document 3) PROCEDURE: 1. After completing background information and introduction, in Sessions two and three, organize students into groups of five to six, creating an even number of groups. Over the course of two class periods the students will examine using guided questions either the South Korean perspective or the U.S. perspective of the U.S.-R.O.K. relationship historically and currently. a. Then give half of the groups the South Korean perspective readings on the U.S.-R.O.K. relationship and give these students the South Korean Perspective Group Worksheet (Document 4) in identifying historic and current issues for South Koreans in this relationship. Readings to be given: b. “Anti-Base Movements in South Korea: Comparative Perspective on the Asia-Pacific” from Foreign Policy in Focus by Andrew Yeo (Document 7) and http://www.fpif.org/articles/anti- base_movements_in_south_korea c. South Korea-U.S. Relations” from Asian Perspective by Katharine Moon (Document 8) and www.wellesley.edu/Polisci/KMoon/asianperspective.pdf or www.wellesley.edu/Polisci/KMoon/uskorea.html d. “Unwanted Missiles for a Korean Island” from The New York Times op-ed contributor Christine Ahn (Document 9) and http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/06/opinion/06iht- edahn06.html?_r=2 3 e. “Emotion is Not the Problem: The U.S.-R.O.K. Relationship in Perspective” from The Korea Society by David Kang (Document 10) and http://www.koreasociety.org/policy/policy/emotion_is_not_ the_problem_the_u.s.-rok_relationship_in_perspective.html iv. The other half of the groups will be given the U.S. perspective readings on the U.S.-R.O.K. relations and the U.S. Perspective Group Worksheet (Document 5) in identifying historic and current issues for the U.S. in this relationship. Readings to be given: a. “Anti-Base Movements in South Korea: Comparative Perspective on the Asia-Pacific” from Foreign Policy in Focus by Andrew Yeo (Document 7) and http://www.fpif.org/articles/anti- base_movements_in_south_korea b. “U.S. Presence Necessary for Korean Security” by Sgt. 1st Class Michael J. Carden in www.army.mil (Document 11) and http://www.army.mil/article/45317/us-presence- necessary-for-korean-security-officials-say/ c. “Why Korea Needs South Korea Base” from The Diplomat an op-ed by Richard Weitz (Document 12) and http://the- diplomat.com/2011/08/21/why-us-needs-south-korea-base/ v. Closure for the end of day three of the lesson, bring class back together and discuss the differences between the South Korean and U.S. perspectives. 2. Session four, reshuffle the groups into new groups containing two to three members from both the South Korean perspective groups and U.S. perspective groups. Students from both perspectives are to utilize Common U.S.-R.O.K. Solutions Group Worksheet (Document 6) to debate, discuss and come together on common possible resolutions to help the U.S.-R.O.K. relationship in keeping with both nations’ actual perspectives on the issues. 3. Session five, have each group from session four present and discuss their resolutions with the class. ASSESSMENT Students will write a draft treaty of their own in paragraph form in which they determine peaceful solutions while trying to satisfy both parties to the best of their ability. This should be two to three pages in length, and address geographic and historic concerns on both sides. It should offer solutions that encourage constructive cooperative between the U.S. and South Korea. RESOURCES Ahn, Christine. “Unwanted Missiles for a Korean Island”. The New York Times.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A PARTNER for CHANGE the Asia Foundation in Korea 1954-2017 a PARTNER Characterizing 60 Years of Continuous Operations of Any Organization Is an Ambitious Task
    SIX DECADES OF THE ASIA FOUNDATION IN KOREA SIX DECADES OF THE ASIA FOUNDATION A PARTNER FOR CHANGE A PARTNER The AsiA Foundation in Korea 1954-2017 A PARTNER Characterizing 60 years of continuous operations of any organization is an ambitious task. Attempting to do so in a nation that has witnessed fundamental and dynamic change is even more challenging. The Asia Foundation is unique among FOR foreign private organizations in Korea in that it has maintained a presence here for more than 60 years, and, throughout, has responded to the tumultuous and vibrant times by adapting to Korea’s own transformation. The achievement of this balance, CHANGE adapting to changing needs and assisting in the preservation of Korean identity while simultaneously responding to regional and global trends, has made The Asia Foundation’s work in SIX DECADES of Korea singular. The AsiA Foundation David Steinberg, Korea Representative 1963-68, 1994-98 in Korea www.asiafoundation.org 서적-표지.indd 1 17. 6. 8. 오전 10:42 서적152X225-2.indd 4 17. 6. 8. 오전 10:37 서적152X225-2.indd 1 17. 6. 8. 오전 10:37 서적152X225-2.indd 2 17. 6. 8. 오전 10:37 A PARTNER FOR CHANGE Six Decades of The Asia Foundation in Korea 1954–2017 Written by Cho Tong-jae Park Tae-jin Edward Reed Edited by Meredith Sumpter John Rieger © 2017 by The Asia Foundation All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced without written permission by The Asia Foundation. 서적152X225-2.indd 1 17. 6. 8. 오전 10:37 서적152X225-2.indd 2 17.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-South Korea Relations
    U.S.-South Korea Relations Mark E. Manyin, Coordinator Specialist in Asian Affairs Emma Chanlett-Avery Specialist in Asian Affairs Mary Beth D. Nikitin Specialist in Nonproliferation Brock R. Williams Analyst in International Trade and Finance Jonathan R. Corrado Research Associate May 23, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41481 U.S.-South Korea Relations Summary Overview South Korea (officially the Republic of Korea, or ROK) is one of the United States’ most important strategic and economic partners in Asia. Congressional interest in South Korea is driven by both security and trade interests. Since the early 1950s, the U.S.-ROK Mutual Defense Treaty commits the United States to help South Korea defend itself. Approximately 28,500 U.S. troops are based in the ROK, which is included under the U.S. “nuclear umbrella.” Washington and Seoul cooperate in addressing the challenges posed by North Korea. The two countries’ economies are joined by the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA). South Korea is the United States’ seventh-largest trading partner and the United States is South Korea’s second- largest trading partner. Between 2009 and the end of 2016, relations between the two countries arguably reached their most robust state in decades. Political changes in both countries in 2017, however, have generated uncertainty about the state of the relationship. Coordination of North Korea Policy Dealing with North Korea is the dominant strategic concern of the relationship. The Trump Administration appears to have raised North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs to a top U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Proxy Voting Records
    Global Proxy Voting Records Vote Summary Report Date range covered: 03/01/2021 to 03/31/2021 Location(s): All Locations Alibaba Health Information Technology Limited Meeting Date: 03/01/2021 Country: Bermuda Record Date: 02/23/2021 Meeting Type: Special Ticker: 241 Primary ISIN: BMG0171K1018 Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Proponent Mgmt Rec Instruction 1 Approve Revised Annual Cap Under the Mgmt For For Technical Services Framework Agreement Baidu, Inc. Meeting Date: 03/01/2021 Country: Cayman Islands Record Date: 01/28/2021 Meeting Type: Special Ticker: BIDU Primary ISIN: US0567521085 Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Proponent Mgmt Rec Instruction Meeting for ADR Holders Mgmt 1 Approve One-to-Eighty Stock Split Mgmt For For Pride International, Inc. Meeting Date: 03/01/2021 Country: USA Record Date: 12/01/2020 Meeting Type: Written Consent Ticker: N/A Primary ISIN: US74153QAJ13 Proposal Vote Number Proposal Text Proponent Mgmt Rec Instruction 1 Vote On The Plan (For = Accept, Against = Mgmt For Abstain Reject; Abstain Votes Do Not Count) 2 Opt Out of the Third-Party Releases (For = Mgmt None For Opt Out, Against or Abstain = Do Not Opt Out) * Instances of "Do Not Vote" are normally owing to: - Share-blocking - temporary restriction of trading by the Sub-Custodian following vote submission - Client restrictions - Conflicts of Interest. For any queries, please contact [email protected] Global Proxy Voting Records Vote Summary Report Date range covered: 03/01/2021 to 03/31/2021 Location(s): All Locations The
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-South Korea Relations
    U.S.-South Korea Relations Mark E. Manyin, Coordinator Specialist in Asian Affairs Emma Chanlett-Avery Specialist in Asian Affairs Mary Beth Nikitin Analyst in Nonproliferation Mi Ae Taylor Research Associate in Asian Affairs December 8, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41481 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress U.S.-South Korea Relations Summary Since late 2008, relations between the United States and South Korea (known officially as the Republic of Korea, or ROK) have been arguably at their best state in decades. By the middle of 2010, in the view of many in the Obama Administration, South Korea had emerged as the United States’ closest ally in East Asia. Of all the issues on the bilateral agenda, Congress has the most direct role to play in the proposed Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA). Congressional approval is necessary for the agreement to go into effect. In early December 2010, the two sides announced they had agreed on modifications to the original agreement, which was signed in 2007. South Korea accepted a range of U.S. demands designed to help the U.S. auto industry and received some concessions in return. In the United States, the supplementary deal appears to have changed the minds of many groups and members of Congress who previously had opposed the FTA, which is now expected to be presented to the 112th Congress in 2011. If Congress approves the agreement, it would be the United States’ second largest FTA, after the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
    [Show full text]
  • Abl25thesispdf.Pdf (2.788Mb)
    THE HOPE AND CRISIS OF PRAGMATIC TRANSITION: POLITICS, LAW, ANTHROPOLOGY AND SOUTH KOREA A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School Of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Amy Beth Levine May 2011 © 2011 Amy Beth Levine THE HOPE AND CRISIS OF PRAGMATIC TRANSITION: POLITICS, LAW, ANTHROPOLOGY AND SOUTH KOREA Amy Beth Levine, Ph.D. Cornell University 2011 This dissertation demonstrates how the urgent condition of crisis is routine for many non-governmental (NGO) and non-profit organization (NPO) workers, activists, lawyers, social movement analysts, social designers and ethnographers. The study makes a contribution to the increasing number of anthropological, legal, pedagogical, philosophical, political, and socio-legal studies concerned with pragmatism and hope by approaching crisis as ground, hope as figure, and pragmatism as transition or placeholder between them. In effect this work makes evident the agency of the past in the apprehension of the present, whose complexity is conceptualized as scale, in order to hopefully refigure ethnography’s future role as an anticipatory process rather than a pragmatic response to crisis or an always already emergent world. This dissertation is based on over two years of fieldwork inside NGOs, NPOs, and think tanks, hundreds of conversations, over a hundred interviews, and archival research in Seoul, South Korea. The transformation of the “386 generation” and Roh Moo Hyun’s presidency from 2003 to 2008 serve as both the contextual background and central figures of the study. This work replicates the historical, contemporary, and anticipated transitions of my informants by responding to the problem of agency inherent in crisis with a sense of scale and a rescaling of agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Society Korea Center Turns 1
    May—August 2009. Issue no. (5). A newsletter published as a membership service of the Asia Society Korea Center. Inside Save the Date Monthly Luncheon Series 2 Tuesday, December 8 News & Events 3 Membership 4 Asia Society Korea Center Annual Christmas Dinner Asia Society Korea Center Turns 1 아 시 아 소 사 On June 30, 2009, Asia Society Korea Center held its first year anniversary dinner at the 이 Lotte Hotel Seoul’s Sapphire Ballroom. Nearly 200 guests attended the event, including 어 H.E. Kathleen Stephens, the U.S. Ambassador to Seoul, and Susan Shirk, Director of the Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation (IGCC) at the University of California, 티 San Diego and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State during the Clinton Admini- 코 stration. The event was attended by a cross section of national and international figures such as the former South Korean Prime Ministers Lho Shin-Young and Lee Hong Koo, 리 National Assembly Member Ryan Jung Wook Hong and Mr. H.S. (Hyun Sang) Cho, 아 Executive Vice President of the Hyosung Group and the Chairman of the Asia 21 Korea Chapter. (see page 3) 센 터 K21 News Become a Member 소 The Asia 21 Korea Chapter (K21) has 식 continued to expand extensively since Today! its founding in 2006. Over the summer, Asia Society Korea Center is a non- nine new members have been selected HONG KONG and have joined the Chapter. With its profit and non-partisan organization. devotion and contribution to public Your membership support remains HOUSTON service and education for migrant vital to our success.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiencing South Korea FPRI/Korea Society 2015 Korean
    Experiencing South Korea FPRI/Korea Society 2015 Korean Presidents: an Evaluation of Effective Leadership Author: Ellen Resnek: Downingtown East High School Lesson Overview: Through the use of various primary and secondary sources, students in this lesson will identify, understand and be able to explain the Korean President Power Ranking: Technically, the Republic of Korea has had ten heads of government since its birth in 1948: (1) Syngmn Rhee (1948-1960); (2) Chang Myon (1960-1961); (3) Park Chung-hee (1961-1979); (4) Choi Gyu-ha (1979-1980); (5) Chun Doo-hwan (1980-1987); (6) Roh Tae-woo (1987-1992); (7) Kim Young-sam (1992-1997); (8) Kim Dae-jung (1997-2002); (9) Roh Moo-hyun (2002-2007) ; (10) Lee Myeong-bak (2007-2012).; and Park Geun-hye, 2013–current. But one can see that Chang Myon and Choi Gyu-ha did not last very long, because they abdicated from their posts when their successors rolled into Seoul with tanks. Objectives: 1. Students will learn background information regarding Korean President Power 2. Students will develop an appreciation of people who have helped shape the history and culture of Korea. 3. Students will become aware of some of the most important events in Korean history. 4. Students will examine various leadership styles and determine those the students might want to emulate. Materials Required Handouts provided Computers for research While this lesson is complete in itself, it can be enriched by books on Korea and updated regularly by checking the Internet for current information. Experiencing South Korea FPRI/Korea Society 2015 Procedure: Lesson Objectives: Students will be able to: Evaluate authors’ differing points of view on the same historical event or issue by assessing the authors’ claims, reasoning, and evidence Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in analyzing how style and content contribute to the power, persuasiveness, or beauty of the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Korea-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress
    Order Code RL33567 Korea-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress Updated July 25, 2008 Larry A. Niksch Specialist in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Korea-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress Summary The United States has had a military alliance with South Korea and important interests in the Korean peninsula since the Korean War of 1950-53. Many U.S. interests relate to communist North Korea. Since the early 1990s, the issue of North Korea’s development of nuclear weapons has been the dominant U.S. policy concern. Experts in and out of the U.S. government believe that North Korea has produced at least six atomic bombs, and North Korea tested a nuclear device in October 2006. In 2007, a six party negotiation (between the United States, North Korea, China, South Korea, Japan, and Russia) produced agreements encompassing two North Korean and two U.S. obligations: disablement of North Korea’s Yongbyon nuclear installations, a North Korean declaration of nuclear programs, U.S. removal of North Korea from the U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism, and U.S. removal of North Korea from the sanctions provisions of the U.S. Trading with the Enemy Act. In June and July 2008, North Korea and the Bush Administration announced measures to implement fully the agreements by October 31, 2008. The Bush Administration has subordinated to the nuclear other North Korean activities that affect U.S. interests. North Korean exports of counterfeit U.S. currency and U.S. products produce upwards of $1 billion annually for the North Korean regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions Fall/Winter 2007
    “Saints” © 2008 Diane J. Schmidt Transitions Fall/Winter 2007 1 Contents Pulisher/Editor Mary Lin 2 Kathleen Stephens: from Arizonan to world citizen Associate Editor Ashley Mains 4 More Kids in the Woods Staff Writers Mary K. Croft • Mary Lin • Ashley Mains 5 Senator Tom Udall Continues Family Tradition Staff Photographers Sher Shah Khan • Mary Lin • Ashley Mains Travis Patterson • Bridget Reynolds 6 Adam Zemans Ph.D. Profile Contributing Photographers Richard Dance • Bill Feldmeier • Terry Ford 7 Joanne Oellers Master of Arts Profile Karl Hardy • Tim Hull • Doug Hulmes Jan Kempster • Judy Lewis • Richard Lewis Joanne Oellers • Rachel Peters • Diane Schmidt 8 PC People in Politics John Sheedy • Kathleen Stephens • Tom Udall Rick Wheeler • Fulton Wright • Vicky Young Adam Zemans • The City of Prescott 10 Prescott College Earns High Marks Committee To Elect George Seaman Common Cause • stevedieckhoff.com Mesa City Council Office • Topsy Foundation 11 Art Gallery at Sam Hill Opens The Official Jeff Carlson Website Sam Young for Vermont Governor Campaign 12 Diane Schmidt: Memoir of El Salvador Vice President for Development Joel Hiller (928) 350-4501 • [email protected] 13 US Stamp Features George Huey Photo For Class Notes and address changes, contact Marie Smith • [email protected] 14 What Democracy Looks Like Send correspondence, reprint requests and submissions to: Mary Lin Prescott College 15 Emma Howland-Bolton: Democracy in Action 220 Grove Ave. Prescott, AZ 86301 (928) 350-4503 • [email protected] 16 Paper Makes Strong Bricks Transitions, a publication for the Prescott College community, is published three times a year by the Public Relations Office for 17 Nelson Donation alumni, parents, friends, students, faculty and staff of the College.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Society Korea Programs
    ABOUT ASIA SOCIETY & ASIA SOCIETY KOREA Founded in 1956 by John D. Rockefeller 3rd, Asia Society has bee n a leading nonprofit educational institution with 14 global branch es all over the world. Across the fields of arts, business, culture, ed ucation, and policy, we provide insight, generate ideas, and promot Dong-Bin Shin Hong-Koo Lee e collaboration to address present challenges and create a shared f Chairman & Founder Honorary Chairman uture. Since its establishment in April 2008, Asia Society Korea has been serving as an active gateway for engagement on issues affecting Korea, the Asia-Pacific region and the United States. Through our programs, we have been seeking to integrate Korean voices into th Sung-joo Han Young Joon Kim Board Member Board Member e broad range of Asia Society programs across the region. We have opened up conversations around Asia about how relation between countries has changed and what to focus for next moves by engagi ng our partners and our network of Centers, and through raising a wareness of Asia Society across Korea and the Asia-Pacific region . Mark Tetto Yvonne Yoon-Hee Kim Board Member Executive Director “Preparing Asians and Americans for a Shared Future” MEMBERSHIP INVOLVEMENTS Fulfil your company’s social responsibility efforts by supporting Asia Society’s programs that help educate the community about social issues, diversity efforts, and Asian-American interests. When you become an Asia Society member, you become a part of essential global network that acc esses to connections to like-minded businesses and individuals on both sides of the Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Aid and the Development of the Republic of Korea: the Effectiveness of Concessional Assistance
    AID Evaluation Special Study No. 42 Foreign Aid and the Development of the Republic of Korea: The Effectiveness of Concessional Assistance December 1985 Agency for International Development (AID) Washington, D.C. 20523 PN-AAL-075 FOREIGN AID AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONCESSIONAL ASSISTANCE AID SPECIAL STUDY NO. 42 by David I. Steinberg u.s. Agency for International Development October 1985 The views in this report are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Agency for International Development. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface . ................................................... v Summary . ................................................... vii Glossary . .................................................. x Map . ...•.........•..••........••..•••••.•..•••...•.......•. xi 1 • In trod u c t ion . .• . • • • . • • . • • . • . • . 1 1.1 Background . ...................................... 1 1.2 On Folklore and Definitions ..•...•.•.........•.••• 3 1. 2 .1 Growth . .................................... 7 1. 2. 2 Equity . .................................... 7 1.3 Factors in Korean Growth and Equity •.••.•......... 9 1. 3.1 Ethnici ty an~ Culture .•.•.................. 9 1. 3. 2 Land Reform ................................ 11 1.3.3 Education ..•...........•.......•........... l3 1. 3. 4 The Mer i tocratic State ......•....•......... 16 2. Korean Growth ..•••..................................... 1 7 2.1 Economic Accomplishments of the Republic of Korea, 1953-1983 ....•......................••..
    [Show full text]
  • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT in the REPUBLIC of KOREA a Policy Perspective
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA A Policy Perspective Edited by Lee-Jay Cho and Yoon Hyung Kim ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA 126°E 130 ° E DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S ( REPUBLIC OF KOREA / (North Korea) .,/------ .. - .. - .--.-/ I ' .... rrl f" .,)~ ....... ~ 38°N .... : ' , ,/ KANGWON East Sea ,, -, , (Sea of Japan) ,( , KVONGGI j ,_~~-~ '" ,_..... ( /-/NORTH / "-~/ CH'UNGCH'ONG / " .-J-,_J _, r NORTH KVONGSANG -.... -- 36°N r ....... -\ Yellow Sea / .T~egu NORTH \ 'J ...... I CHOLLA , ,r- ' - ..... _"' .... ,--/ ... -- SOUTH KVONGSANG o {l.SUSHIMA 00 0 c[4o 0 0 :WON D' IS' :w ON 0 ---""'; f USS P Cheju SI,.it ;' po.t:' "5" :;:;!)A. I ~ SOlfJ1;l-KOREA (ROK) 5fI miles Pacific lr r Ocean 50 100 150 200 kilometers 126"E ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA A Policy Perspective Edited by Lee-Jay Cho and Yoon Hyung Kim An East-West Center Book Distributed by the University of Hawaii Press © 1991 by the East-West Center All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Economic development in the Republic of Korea I edited by Lee-Jay Cho and Yoon Hyung Kim. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-86638-131-7 : $49.50 1. Korea (South)-Economic policy-1960- 2. Korea (South)-Social policy. 3. Industry and state-Korea (South) I. Cho, Lee-Jay. II. Kim, Yoon Hyung. HC467.E266 1991 338.95195-dc20 90-20706 CIP Published in 1991 by the East-West Center 1777 East-West Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96848 Distributed by the University of Hawaii Press 2840 I<olowalu Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 Contents List of Figures ix List of Tables xi Contributors xix Acknowledgments xxiii Preface xxv PART I: POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC BACKGROUND 1.
    [Show full text]