Poetry and the Canadian Public Sphere: the Public
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
POETRY AND THE CANADIAN PUBLIC SPHERE: THE PUBLIC INTELLECTUAL ENGAGEMENT OF PAULINE JOHNSON, DOROTHY LIVESAY, AND DIONNE BRAND SHAUNA LANCIT A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH YORK UNIVERSITY, TORONTO, ONTARIO MARCH 2017 ©Shauna Lancit, 2017 ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the roles of Pauline Johnson, Dorothy Livesay, and Dionne Brand in the evolution of the public sphere in Canada, arguing that each of these writers has functioned as what we now call a “public intellectual.” Taking their careers as exemplary, I show that the Canadian context has been particularly conducive to the ability of women poets to fulfill this social function. In attending closely to the role of the public sphere in their poetry I offer a new lens through which to understand some of their significant poems. In situating these poets in their material and historical contexts I also offer an explanation of why Canadian women writers, and poets in particular, have been unexpectedly well situated to appear as public intellectuals. Beginning with a genealogy of the public intellectual, I show the significance of this figure in the Canadian context. I demonstrate that institutional responses to Canada’s unique challenges in establishing and sustaining a public sphere have had wide-ranging effects on opportunities for artists and intellectuals to shape that sphere. These include the amplification of the voices of women poets relative to a purely market-based public sphere. I situate Johnson, Livesay, and Brand in their material and discursive contexts in order to make sense of the ways in which they figure the public sphere in their poetry, and the ways in which they use both their poetry and other forms of cultural production to encourage political and cultural change. Using an Arendtian view of the public, I argue that poetry has been an ideal site for building and maintaining a Canadian public sphere. ii Acknowledgements I wish to acknowledge: My supervisor, Len Early, a patient and rigorous guide who took on a work-in-progress and helped me mold it into its best form. My readers Terry Goldie and Art Redding, whose generous, careful, and engaged readings strengthened this project beyond measure. Barbara Godard, who was my interlocutor as these ideas were first taking shape, my imagined audience as I wrote, and whose intellectual legacy enlivens and marks this project in its entirety. Candida Rifkind, for answering questions about her research on Dorothy Livesay. Carole Gerson and Erin Wunker for sharing their articles with me. Trish Salah and k.g. Guttman, for their companionship, intellectual and otherwise. Heather White, for her eagle eye. My parents Irwin and Sheila Lancit, for the love and support that made it possible to both imagine and complete this project. Dana Baitz for her constant support as a partner, a co-parent, a colleague, and a friend, and for agreeing that creating is more important than cleaning. Asher Baitz for doing some of his growing up alongside this project, for accepting that I am sometimes lost in thought, and for sharing my love of poetry. Part of the argument in Chapter 2 appeared in Regenerations: Canadian Women’s Writing, Marie Carriére and Patricia Demers, eds., Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, 2014, pp. 269-82 as an article entitled “This is What a Public Intellectual Looks Like: Dorothy Livesay’s Housewife Years and the Public Sphere.” I wish to thank the University of Alberta Press for allowing me to retain copyright of this material and to expand it, now incorporated in Chapter 2 as pages 132-153. iii Contents Abstract ii Acknowledgements iii Table of Contents iv Introduction: Canadian Women Poets as Public Intellectuals 1 The Origins and Current Use of the Term “Public Intellectual” 2 Current Canadian Scholarship 6 Legislating Nothing 8 Prehistory of the Public Intellectual: Two Trajectories of Thinking About the Relationship Between the Intellectual and the Public 11 Poetry and the Canadian Public Sphere 23 Gender and the Canadian Public Intellectual 27 Structure of the Dissertation 30 Chapter 1. Pauline Johnson 37 Introduction 38 Outside the Mermaid Inn: Johnson’s Cultural Field 42 “People of Dramatic Intelligences”: Johnson’s Racial Melodrama 50 A Natural Poet: Johnson’s Semiotic field 57 “They Never Think How They Would Feel”: “A Cry from an Indian Wife” 63 “What a Public You Have” 75 iv Johnson the Dreyfusard: “‘Give Us Barabbas’” 78 Conclusion 88 Chapter 2. Dorothy Livesay 90 Introduction 90 The Public, Modernism, and the Massey Commission 94 Radio Broadcasting, the CBC and Other Publics of Modernist Canada 98 Livesay’s Publics 102 Livesay as Imagist 103 Livesay as Marxist and the Invention of the Documentary Poem 111 1. Livesay as Marxist 111 2. Livesay as Documentarian 120 The CBC Talks: Livesay as a Thinking Housewife 133 “She Cannot Think Alone”: The Limits of the Thinking Housewife 146 Counterpublics of the Housewife 151 Chapter 3. Dionne Brand 155 Introduction 155 No Language is Neutral: Coming Out as Inventory 162 “No Basis for Consensus”: Brand and the Politics of the Canadian Public Sphere 180 An Inventory of These Small Years 190 The Privation of the Literary Prize 191 v An Inventory of Despair: Mourning the Loss of a Public 198 Conclusion 209 Afterword 211 Works Cited 218 vi Introduction: Canadian Women Poets as Public Intellectuals How, and in what contexts, do poets function as public intellectuals? Are there institutions in Canada that have allowed poets to serve this function? Have women been particularly well placed to take advantage of the potential of poetry to speak to, to create, public life in Canada? These are some of the key questions of this dissertation. I ask them in a scholarly moment when they feel highly relevant. I finish this dissertation in the midst of rich conversations about an issue that was less prominent in Canadian critical discourse when I began. Throughout academia, and in public life, the idea of the public intellectual is gaining momentum as an area of inquiry. Although the rise of any theory is always multiply determined, my sense is that the question of the public intellectual has gained urgency because of the many crises that academics find themselves facing. As universities realign their purposes amidst great economic and political change, individual intellectuals are called upon to examine their political function, both within and outside the academy. Tenured academics with a commitment to some version of the university as a force for enabling and preserving intellectual engagement as a public good are explicitly making the case for the intellectual as a public figure. In Canada, funding bodies such as the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council have begun to describe their relevance in terms such as “community engagement,” and “outcomes and impacts” (“Home Page”). In a Canadian context, this change has likely had an influence on the number of projects that are concerned with the engagement and public impact of the intellectual. As well, those scholars who find 1 themselves without access to funding or secure employment in the academy can look to the model of the public intellectual as an alternative source of identity (and perhaps even income). This project emerges from a historical moment in which the question of the public intellectual in Canada, as internationally, could hardly feel more pressing. The Origins and Current Use of the Term “Public Intellectual” The term “public intellectual” was brought into widespread circulation by Russell Jacoby’s The Last Intellectuals (1987), in which he acknowledges the origin of the term in the work of C. Wright Mills (117). Jacoby argues that the twin forces of gentrification and the absorption of New Left intellectuals into the academy had effectively eliminated the cultural role of the public intellectual, which he sees as having originated in the French intellectual response to the Dreyfus affair (107). Somewhat ironically, Jacoby’s argument, which I discuss at length later in this introduction, inspired a slew of responses that sought to affirm and analyze a number of figures as public intellectuals, and a number of sites as conducive to public intellectual work. The figure of the public intellectual has become highly compelling, both in academia and the popular press. The term has come to be used by journalists to establish the relevance of contemporary figures, and is sometimes inflected with the discourse of celebrity. For example, in 2008 Foreign Policy magazine published a list of what it considered to be the top 100 public intellectuals, then subjected the list to an online competition to further rank the competitors (“Top 100”). 2 Within academic contexts the term has had a parallel appeal. The Modern Language Association’s International Bibliography shows it surging in popularity between the late 1990s and the present moment. Interest in public intellectuals spans the social sciences and humanities; much new scholarship on the topic continues in Jacoby’s tradition of imagining a masculine writer of clear, accessible, discursive prose. Recent publications such as Public Intellectuals and International Affairs: Essays on Public Thinkers and Political Projects (Navari 2013), and The Public Intellectual in Canada (Wiseman 2013) either represent women’s voices as an extreme minority, or exclude them entirely. While editors note and theorize reasons for this exclusion, they fail to mention what is to my mind the most significant factor: that Jacoby’s definition of the public intellectual and conceptions of the figure that follow in his footsteps begin from terms that are already highly gendered. For the purposes of this dissertation, one of the most significant of these terms is genre. In keeping my focus on poetry, I mobilize the question of the public intellectual in a way that contests this dominant understanding of the term.