Purpose Pathological Gait Objectives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Purpose Pathological Gait Objectives Primary, Secondary and Compensatory Gait Deviations in CP Disclosure Information AACPDM 71st Annual Meeting | September 13-16, 2017 Speaker Names: Sylvia Ounpuu, MSc and Kristan Pierz, MD Differentiating Between Primary, Secondary Disclosure of Relevant Financial Relationships: and Compensatory Mechanisms in Gait in We have no financial relationships to disclose. Persons with Cerebral Palsy Disclosure of Off-Label and/or investigative uses: We will not discuss off label use and/or investigational use in our presentation. Sylvia Õunpuu, MSc and Kristan Pierz, MD Center for Motion Analysis Division of Orthopaedics Connecticut Children’s Medical Center Farmington, Connecticut Purpose Pathological Gait To describe gait pathology in CP in terms of primary, secondary and compensatory deviations. video Compensation Objectives: Secondary Deviation • Define primary and secondary deviations and Primary compensations seen in gait Deviation Primary • Differentiate between primary deviations that Deviation need to be treated and other gait deviations that Primary Deviation will resolve if the primary problem is addressed Primary Secondary • Understand common multi-level gait patterns in Deviation Deviation CP • Describe how motion analysis can help us Compensation understand primary vs. secondary gait deviations Primary Deviation AACPDM 2017 - IC #3 1 Primary, Secondary and Compensatory Gait Deviations in CP Outline Angle definition • Review of fundamentals for joint kinematics • The specific body including angle definitions and plotting segments that conventions. make up the angle • Review of typical joint kinematic patterns. • With consideration • Define, primary, secondary and compensatory for the orientation gait deviations. of the “viewer” • Case Examples when looking at the angle Joint Angle Definitions What is this angle definition ? Which one? 105 deg 60 degrees 20 deg 210 120 degrees degrees Joint Angle Definitions Trunk Motion • Kinematics for the trunk, pelvis, hip, knee and ankle/foot progression • Coronal, sagittal, transverse planes • Stance and swing phases of gait AACPDM 2017 - IC #3 2 Primary, Secondary and Compensatory Gait Deviations in CP Trunk Coronal Plane Trunk Sagittal Plane • Angle Definition • Angle Definition – the lateral (side to side) – the forward inclination of the long inclination of the axis of the torso long axis of the torso relative to the lab relative to the lab coordinate system coordinate system – as viewed from the front and perpendicular – as viewed by an to the plane formed by observer looking the long axis of the along a line torso and the bi- connecting the clavicular line clavicles Trunk Transverse Plane Trunk • Angle Definition Direction of Progression – the motion of the bi- clavicular line relative to the lab coordinate system Bi-clavicular line – as seen by an observer looking down the long Coronal Sagittal Transverse C7 axis of the torso looking (range of motion (range of motion (range of motion from above 1 degree) 3 degrees) 5 degrees) Pelvic Motion Pelvis Coronal Plane • Angle Definition – Angle of inclination of the right and left anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) in relation to the horizontal – As viewed from the front of and in the pelvic plane AACPDM 2017 - IC #3 3 Primary, Secondary and Compensatory Gait Deviations in CP Pelvis Sagittal Plane Pelvis Transverse Plane • Angle Definition • Angle Definition – inclination (typically – motion of the ASIS to ASIS line relative to the anterior) of the pelvic lab coordinate system plane with respect to (direction of the horizontal progression) – as viewed by an observer – as viewed by an whose site line is observer looking perpendicular to the along a line pelvic plane connecting the ASIS's Pelvis Hip Motion Coronal Sagittal Transverse (range of (range of (range of motion 8 motion 4 motion 8 degrees) degrees) degrees) Hip Coronal Plane Hip Coronal Plane Kinematic • Angle Definition • Stance – LR = adduction – relative angle – MST/TST/PS = between long axis of abduction the thigh and a • Swing perpendicular to the pelvic plane – ISW = abduction – MSW/TSW = – as viewed from the adduction front of and in the ° pelvic plane • ROM = 13 (Add=adduction, abd=abduction) AACPDM 2017 - IC #3 4 Primary, Secondary and Compensatory Gait Deviations in CP Hip Sagittal Plane Hip Sagittal Plane Kinematic • Angle Definition • Stance – relative angle – LR/MST/TST = between the long axis extension of the thigh and a – PS = flexion perpendicular to the • Swing pelvic plane – ISW/MSW = flexion – as viewed by an – TSW = minimal observer looking extension along a line • ROM = 43° connecting the (Flex = flexion, Ext = extension) ASIS's Hip Transverse Plane Hip Transverse Plane Kinematic • Stance • Angle Definition – LR = internally rotates – motion of the thigh – MST/TST = internally (as defined by the rotated knee flexion – PS = externally rotates extension axis) • Swing relative to the ASIS - – ISW = internally ASIS line rotates – as viewed by an – MSW/TSW = observer in the pelvic externally rotates (Int = internal, Ext = External) plane • ROM = 8° Knee Motion Knee Coronal Plane • Angle Definition – relative angle between long axis of the shank and the long axis of the thigh – as viewed from the front of in the thigh plane AACPDM 2017 - IC #3 5 Primary, Secondary and Compensatory Gait Deviations in CP Knee Coronal Plane Kinematic Knee Sagittal Plane • Angle Definition • Motion – relative angle – negligible between the long axis • Position of the thigh and – neutral shank segments – as viewed by an observer looking along the knee flexion/extension (var=varus=adduction, axis val=valgus=abduction) Knee Sagittal Plane Kinematic Knee Transverse Plane • Stance • Angle Definition – LR = flexion – motion of the shank (as – MST/TST = extension defined by the ankle dorsi/plantar flexion – PS = flexion axis) relative to the knee • Swing flexion extension axis – ISW = flexion line – as viewed by an observer – MSW = extension above the thigh plane – TSW = extension • ROM = 60° (Flex = flexion, Ext = extension) Knee Transverse Plane Kinematic Ankle Motion/Foot Progression • Stance – LR/MST/TST = progressive internal rotation • Swing – ISW/MSW/TSW = progressive external rotation • ROM = 11(5)° AACPDM 2017 - IC #3 6 Primary, Secondary and Compensatory Gait Deviations in CP Ankle Sagittal Plane Ankle Sagittal Plane Kinematic • Stance • Angle Definition – LR = plantar flexion – the relative angle – MST/TST = dorsiflexion between a perpendicular to the – PS = plantar flexion long axis of the shank • Swing and the plantar aspect – ISW = continued plantar of the foot flexion then dorsiflexion – as viewed by looking – MSW = dorsiflexion to along an axis neutral (Dors = dorsiflexion, perpendicular to the Plnt = plantar flexion) shank-foot plane – TSW = minimal plantar flexion • ROM = 30° Foot Progression Foot Progression Kinematics • Stance • Angle Definition – LR/MST/TST = – angle between the long progressive external axis of the foot (ankle rotation center along to space – PS = internally rotates between 2nd and 3rd metatarsals) and the • Swing direction of progression – ISW/MSW = externally rotates – TSW = internally rotates (Int = internal, Ext = External) Foot progression angle • ROM = 6° Pathological Gait • Trunk, pelvis, hip, knee and ankle/foot progression Can be very complicated! • Coronal, sagittal, transverse planes CORONAL SAGITTAL TRANSVERSE AACPDM 2017 - IC #3 7 Primary, Secondary and Compensatory Gait Deviations in CP Compensation Definitions Secondary Deviation • Primary Deviation – kinematic abnormality Primary related to the impairment at the joint Deviation Primary • Secondary Deviation – kinematic Deviation Primary abnormality at another joint that is a direct Deviation result of a primary deviation Primary Secondary Deviation Deviation • Compensation – kinematic abnormality that is voluntary that helps reduce impact Compensation of primary deviation Primary Deviation Primary Deviation Secondary Deviation • Kinematic abnormality related to the • Kinematic abnormality related to the impairment at the joint impairment at the joint • For example: • For example: – Impairment: Internal femoral torsion/femoral – Impairment: Internal femoral torsion/femoral anteversion (65 internal) anteversion (65 internal) – Associated kinematic abnormality – Primary – Associated kinematic abnormality – Primary Deviation: excessive internal hip rotation Deviation: excessive internal hip rotation – Secondary Deviation: excessive internal foot progression Voluntary Compensation Case Examples • Kinematic abnormality that is voluntary that helps reduce impact of primary deviation • For example: – Vault – early plantar flexion in mid stance to aid in clearance of the contralateral (swing) limb – Circumduction – hip abduction in swing to aid in clearance of the ipsilateral limb – Increased pelvic transverse plane range of motion over the full gait cycle to increase step length – Increased hip flexion in swing to aid in clearance of the ipsilateral limb AACPDM 2017 - IC #3 8 Primary, Secondary and Compensatory Gait Deviations in CP Pre-requisites of Typical Gait Primary Deviation - Increased Equinus in Swing Which are compromised? • Stance phase stability • Swing phase clearance • Appropriate pre positioning of the foot at initial contact • Adequate step length video • Energy conservation (Perry, Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function, 1992) Sagittal Plane Ankle Kinematic Impairment • Ankle dorsiflexor weakness • Primary – Weakness of the ankle dorsiflexors during isolated deviation:
Recommended publications
  • Foot and Ankle Motion Analysis Using Dynamic Radiographic Imaging Benjamin Donald Mchenry Marquette University
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects Foot and Ankle Motion Analysis Using Dynamic Radiographic Imaging Benjamin Donald McHenry Marquette University Recommended Citation McHenry, Benjamin Donald, "Foot and Ankle Motion Analysis Using Dynamic Radiographic Imaging" (2013). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 276. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/276 FOOT AND ANKLE MOTION ANALYSIS USING DYNAMIC RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING by Benjamin D. McHenry, B.S. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2013 ABSTRACT FOOT AND ANKLE MOTION ANALYSIS USING DYNAMIC RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING Benjamin D. McHenry, B.S. Marquette University, 2013 Lower extremity motion analysis has become a powerful tool used to assess the dynamics of both normal and pathologic gait in a variety of clinical and research settings. Early rigid representations of the foot have recently been replaced with multi-segmental models capable of estimating intra-foot motion. Current models using externally placed markers on the surface of the skin are easily implemented, but suffer from errors associated with soft tissue artifact, marker placement repeatability, and rigid segment assumptions. Models using intra-cortical bone pins circumvent these errors, but their invasive nature has limited their application to research only. Radiographic models reporting gait kinematics currently analyze progressive static foot positions and do not include dynamics. The goal of this study was to determine the feasibility of using fluoroscopy to measure in vivo intra-foot dynamics of the hindfoot during the stance phase of gait. The developed fluoroscopic system was synchronized to a standard motion analysis system which included a multi-axis force platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Locomotor Training with Partial Body Weight Support in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: Literature Review
    doi: ISSN 0103-5150 Fisioter. Mov., Curitiba, v. 26, n. 4, p.página 907-920, set./dez. 2013 Licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons [T] Treino locomotor com suporte parcial de peso corporal na reabilitação da lesão medular: revisão da literatura [I] Locomotor training with partial body weight support in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: literature review [A] Cristina Maria Rocha Dutra[a], Cynthia Maria Rocha Dutra[b], Auristela Duarte de Lima Moser[c], Elisangela Ferretti Manffra[c] [a] Mestranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologia em Saúde da Pontiícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba, PR - Brasil, e-mail: [email protected] [b] Professora mestre da Universidade Tuiuti do PR - Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil, e-mail: [email protected] [c] Professoras doutoras do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologia em Saúde da Pontiícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, P - Brasil, e-mails: [email protected], [email protected] [R] Resumo Introdução: O treino locomotor com suporte de peso corporal (TLSP) é utilizado há aproximadamente 20 anos no campo da reabilitação em pacientes que sofrem de patologias neurológicas. O TLSP favorece melhoras osteomusculares, cardiovasculares e psicológicas, pois desenvolve ao máximo o potencial residual do orga- nismo, proporcionando a reintegração na convivência familiar, proissional e social. Objetivo: Identiicar as principais modalidades de TLSP e seus parâmetros de avaliação com a inalidade de contribuir com o esta- belecimento de evidências coniáveis para as práticas reabilitativas de pessoas com lesão medular. Materiais e métodos: Foram analisados artigos originais, publicados entre 2000 e 2011, que envolvessem treino de marcha após a lesão medular, com ou sem suporte parcial de peso corporal, e tecnologias na assistência do treino, como biofeedback e estimulação elétrica funcional, entre outras.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Segment Foot Models and Their Use in Clinical Populations
    Gait & Posture 69 (2019) 50–59 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Gait & Posture journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gaitpost Review Multi-segment foot models and their use in clinical populations T ⁎ Alberto Leardinia,1, Paolo Caravaggia, ,1, Tim Theologisb,2, Julie Stebbinsb,2 a Movement Analysis Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy b Oxford Gait Laboratory, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Background: Many multi-segment foot models based on skin-markers have been proposed for in-vivo kinematic Foot joints analysis of foot joints. It remains unclear whether these models have developed far enough to be useful in clinical Kinematics populations. The present paper aims at reviewing these models, by discussing major methodological issues, and Multisegment foot models analyzing relevant clinical applications. Clinical gait analysis Research question: Can multi-segment foot models be used in clinical populations? Foot pathologies Methods: Pubmed and Google Scholar were used as the main search engines to perform an extensive literature search of papers reporting definition, validation or application studies of multi-segment foot models. The search keywords were the following: ‘multisegment’; ‘foot’; ‘model’; ‘kinematics’, ‘joints’ and ‘gait’. Results: More than 100 papers published between 1991 and 2018 were identified and included in the review. These studies either described a technique or reported a clinical application of one of nearly 40 models which differed according to the number of segments, bony landmarks, marker set, definition of anatomical frames, and convention for calculation of joint rotations. Only a few of these models have undergone robust validation studies. Clinical application papers divided by type of assessment revealed that the large majority of studies were a cross-sectional comparison of a pathological group to a control population.
    [Show full text]
  • Pes Anserine Bursitis
    BRIGHAM AND WOMEN’S HOSPITAL Department of Rehabilitation Services Physical Therapy Standard of Care: Pes Anserine Bursitis ICD 9 Codes: 726.61 Case Type / Diagnosis: The pes anserine bursa lies behind the medial hamstring, which is composed of the tendons of the sartorius, gracilis and semitendinosus (SGT) muscles. Because these 3 tendons splay out on the anterior aspect of the tibia and give the appearance of the foot of a goose, pes anserine bursitis is also known as goosefoot bursitis.1 These muscles provide for medial stabilization of the knee by acting as a restraint to excessive valgus opening. They also provide a counter-rotary torque function to the knee joint. The pes anserine has an eccentric role during the screw-home mechanism that dampens the effect of excessively forceful lateral rotation that may accompany terminal knee extension.2 Pes anserine bursitis presents as pain, tenderness and swelling over the anteromedial aspect of the knee, 4 to 5 cm below the joint line.3 Pain increases with knee flexion, exercise and/or stair climbing. Inflammation of this bursa is common in overweight, middle-aged women, and may be associated with osteoarthritis of the knee. It also occurs in athletes engaged in activities such as running, basketball, and racquet sports.3 Other risk factors include: 1 • Incorrect training techniques, or changes in terrain and/or distanced run • Lack of flexibility in hamstring muscles • Lack of knee extension • Patellar malalignment Indications for Treatment: • Knee Pain • Knee edema • Decreased active and /or passive ROM of lower extremities • Biomechanical dysfunction lower extremities • Muscle imbalances • Impaired muscle performance (focal weakness or general conditioning) • Impaired function Contraindications: • Patients with active signs/symptoms of infection (fever, chills, prolonged and obvious redness or swelling at hip joint).
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Evolution of the Human Foot: Insights from Experimental Research Nicholas B
    © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2018) 221, jeb174425. doi:10.1242/jeb.174425 REVIEW Rethinking the evolution of the human foot: insights from experimental research Nicholas B. Holowka* and Daniel E. Lieberman* ABSTRACT presumably owing to their lack of arches and mobile midfoot joints Adaptive explanations for modern human foot anatomy have long for enhanced prehensility in arboreal locomotion (see Glossary; fascinated evolutionary biologists because of the dramatic differences Fig. 1B) (DeSilva, 2010; Elftman and Manter, 1935a). Other studies between our feet and those of our closest living relatives, the great have documented how great apes use their long toes, opposable apes. Morphological features, including hallucal opposability, toe halluces and mobile ankles for grasping arboreal supports (DeSilva, length and the longitudinal arch, have traditionally been used to 2009; Holowka et al., 2017a; Morton, 1924). These observations dichotomize human and great ape feet as being adapted for bipedal underlie what has become a consensus model of human foot walking and arboreal locomotion, respectively. However, recent evolution: that selection for bipedal walking came at the expense of biomechanical models of human foot function and experimental arboreal locomotor capabilities, resulting in a dichotomy between investigations of great ape locomotion have undermined this simple human and great ape foot anatomy and function. According to this dichotomy. Here, we review this research, focusing on the way of thinking, anatomical features of the foot characteristic of biomechanics of foot strike, push-off and elastic energy storage in great apes are assumed to represent adaptations for arboreal the foot, and show that humans and great apes share some behavior, and those unique to humans are assumed to be related underappreciated, surprising similarities in foot function, such as to bipedal walking.
    [Show full text]
  • Gait Analysis in Prosthetics by James R
    Gait Analysis in Prosthetics by James R. Gage, M.D. Ramona Hicks, R.P.T., M.A. REVIEW lems faced by lower limb amputees. Inman's measurement techniques included motion pic­ Objective measurement systems which quan­ tures of coronal and sagittal views, as well as tify locomotion have been in use for the past transverse rotations from below using a glass century. But not until World War II, when walkway. Using interrupted light photography, thousands of men returned home to the United the Biomechanics Laboratory team studied the States with amputations, was technology really motion of body segments during gait. Force applied to the understanding of prosthetic gait. plates measured the subject's ground reaction Inman and colleagues1 founded the Biome­ forces, and muscle activity was recorded using chanics Laboratory at the University of Cali­ electromyography (EMG), which measures the fornia to establish fundamental principles of electrical signals associated with contraction of human walking, particularly in relation to prob­ a muscle. Prior to Inman's fundamental studies, prostheses were customized for the individual Temporal and kinematic data, which were col­ amputee, without any particular regard to ra­ lected at slow, free, and fast speeds, showed tional structural design. Inman's goal was to that the hydraulic knees improved the symmetry provide fundamental data essential for the de­ between the prosthetic limb and the sound limb, sign of prosthetic limbs. By analyzing normal especially at the fast and free speeds. This human walking, he and his colleagues laid the finding was true for both cadence and the groundwork for biomechanical analysis of am­ amount of knee-flexion at swing phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Gait Deviations in the Patient with Hemiplegia
    Common gait deviations in the patient with hemiplegia Kim Carter, PT, NCS Things to consider • How did the patient walk before? • Any previous orthopedic conditions? • House set up • Where can they practice walking outside of therapy? • Caregiver’s ability (and/or willingness) to help patient Initial Contact • Problems – Ankle • Contacts with forefoot/flat foot – Is the step too short? – Is the gastroc tight? » Stretch in sitting » Stretch in long sit » Stretch in standing » Stretch in supine Initial Contact • Problems – Ankle • Contacts with the forefoot/flat foot – Are the dorsiflexors weak? » Seated exercises » Standing exercises » Supine exercises » Taping » Bracing Initial Contact Initial Contact • Problems – Knee • Flexed at contact – Look at the ankle first – Tone-inability to extend knee with hip flexion at terminal swing – Are the hamstrings tight? » Supine stretch » Long sit stretch » Sitting stretch » Standing stretch Initial Contact • Problems – Pelvis • Rotation – Inadequate advancing of the leg » Manual cues for orientation of pelvis » Muscular tightness Initial Contact • Problems – Trunk • Flexed – Tight hip flexors – May be due to increased plantarflexion • Rotated – May be rotated forward to advance the leg Loading response • Ankle – Foot slap • Weak dorsiflexors – Closed chain dorsiflexion Loading Response • Knee – Hyperextension • May be due to short step • Muscular weakness – Modified stride squats – Standing knee extension against theraband – Affected leg on step, step up with sound side Midstance • Problems – Ankle
    [Show full text]
  • Gait Changes During Exhaustive Running
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses Dissertations and Theses March 2016 Gait Changes During Exhaustive Running Nathaniel I. Smith University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2 Part of the Sports Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Nathaniel I., "Gait Changes During Exhaustive Running" (2016). Masters Theses. 334. https://doi.org/10.7275/7582860 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2/334 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GAIT CHANGES DURING EXHAUSTIVE RUNNING A Thesis Presented by NATHANIEL SMITH Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the deGree of MASTER OF SCIENCE February 2016 Department of KinesioloGy © Copyright by Nathaniel Smith 2016 All RiGhts Reserved GAIT CHANGES DURING EXHAUSTIVE RUNNING A Thesis Presented by NATHANIEL SMITH Approved as to style and content by: _______________________________________ Brian R. UmberGer, Chair _______________________________________ Graham E. Caldwell, Member _______________________________________ Wes R. Autio, Member __________________________________________ Catrine Tudor-Locke, Department Chair Kinesiology ABSTRACT GAIT CHANGES DURING EXHAUSTIVE RUNNING FEBRUARY 2016 NATHANIEL SMITH, B.S. WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY M.S. UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Dr. Brian R. UmberGer Runners adopt altered gait patterns as they fatigue, and literature indicates that these fatiGued Gait patterns may increase energy expenditure and susceptibility to certain overuse injuries (Derrick et al., 2002; van Gheluwe & Madsen, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander 2013 Principles-Of-Animal-Locomotion.Pdf
    .................................................... Principles of Animal Locomotion Principles of Animal Locomotion ..................................................... R. McNeill Alexander PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON AND OXFORD Copyright © 2003 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 3 Market Place, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1SY All Rights Reserved Second printing, and first paperback printing, 2006 Paperback ISBN-13: 978-0-691-12634-0 Paperback ISBN-10: 0-691-12634-8 The Library of Congress has cataloged the cloth edition of this book as follows Alexander, R. McNeill. Principles of animal locomotion / R. McNeill Alexander. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN 0-691-08678-8 (alk. paper) 1. Animal locomotion. I. Title. QP301.A2963 2002 591.47′9—dc21 2002016904 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Galliard and Bulmer Printed on acid-free paper. ∞ pup.princeton.edu Printed in the United States of America 1098765432 Contents ............................................................... PREFACE ix Chapter 1. The Best Way to Travel 1 1.1. Fitness 1 1.2. Speed 2 1.3. Acceleration and Maneuverability 2 1.4. Endurance 4 1.5. Economy of Energy 7 1.6. Stability 8 1.7. Compromises 9 1.8. Constraints 9 1.9. Optimization Theory 10 1.10. Gaits 12 Chapter 2. Muscle, the Motor 15 2.1. How Muscles Exert Force 15 2.2. Shortening and Lengthening Muscle 22 2.3. Power Output of Muscles 26 2.4. Pennation Patterns and Moment Arms 28 2.5. Power Consumption 31 2.6. Some Other Types of Muscle 34 Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Gait-Cycle Phases for Prosthesis Control
    biomimetics Article Identification of Gait-Cycle Phases for Prosthesis Control Raffaele Di Gregorio * and Lucas Vocenas LaMaViP, Department of Engineering, University of Ferrara, 44122 Ferrara, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0532974828 Abstract: The major problem with transfemoral prostheses is their capacity to compensate for the loss of the knee joint. The identification of gait-cycle phases plays an important role in the control of these prostheses. Such control is completely up to the patient in passive prostheses or partly facilitated by the prosthesis in semiactive prostheses. In both cases, the patient recovers his/her walking ability through a suitable rehabilitation procedure that aims at recreating proprioception in the patient. Understanding proprioception passes through the identification of conditions and parameters that make the patient aware of lower-limb body segments’ postures, and the recognition of the current gait-cycle phase/period is the first step of this awareness. Here, a proposal is presented for the identification of the gait-cycle phases/periods under different walking conditions together with a control logic for a possible active/semiactive prosthesis. The proposal is based on the detection of different gait-cycle events as well as on different walking conditions through a load sensor, which is implemented by analyzing the variations in some gait parameters. The validation of the proposed method is done by using gait-cycle data present in the literature. The proposal assumes the prosthesis is equipped with an energy-storing foot without mobility. Keywords: above-knee amputee; prosthesis; gait cycle; proprioception; lower-limb control Citation: Di Gregorio, R.; Vocenas, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Sciences Library New Book List: July - December 2018 Page 1 of 6
    Health Sciences Library New Book List: July - December 2018 Page 1 of 6 Peer support best practice toolkit: a resource for individuals developing and providing peer support programs for families of children with medical complexity and other lifelong disabilities. Contents: 1. Background and models of peer support -- 2. Current HQ759.913 .P43 programs in Ontario: case studies -- 3. Resources to help you get started - - 4. Rapid evidence review: peer support for families of children with disabilities. Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital. Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, [2015]. 1 volume (unpaged). A therapeutic clown emerges: our story of recruitment and training. A full-length documentary film which traces the recruitment and training of the newest therapeutic clown. WB880 .D66 Conceived and written by Helen Donnelly. Directed and edited by Helen Donnelly & Greg Vanden Kroonenberg. Narrated by Diane Savage. Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, 2018. 1 videodisc (107 min.) Cognitive rehabilitation for pediatric neurological disorders. Chapter contributed by Holland Bloorview staff: Chapter 6 – Lisa Kakonge WS340 .C63 Locascio, Gianna, editor. Cambridge University Press, [2018]. xi, 263 pages Goal setting and motivation in therapy. Chapter contributed by Holland Bloorview staff: Chapter 5 – Gillian King WS350.2 .G62 Poulsen, Anne A., editor. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2015. 269 pages. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Maxwell, Joseph Alex, 1941-, SAGE Publications, 2013. xi, 218
    [Show full text]
  • Section I Introduction
    SECTION I INTRODUCTION 1. OVERVIEW The National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research (NCMRR) was established within the National Institutes of Health (NIH) by legislation (P.L. 101-613) passed in 1990. The Center is a component of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). The mission of NCMRR is to foster development of scientific knowledge needed to enhance the health, productivity, independence, and quality of life of people with physical disabilities. The primary goal of the Center is to bring the health related problems of people with disabilities to the attention of America’s best scientists in order to capitalize upon the myriad advances occurring in the biological, behavioral, and engineering sciences. This is accomplished in part, by supporting research on enhancing the functioning of people with disabilities in daily life. Periodically the Center also sponsors workshops which allow experts in a field to gather and focus on a topic of interest. This document contains a detailed description of the design, execution, results and interpretation of the workshop “Gait Analysis in Rehabilitation Medicine.” 1.1 Purpose The primary purpose of the workshop, described within this document, was to develop and prioritize a set of recommendations that pertain to the future role of gait analysis in enhancing the function of people with disabilities due to functional limitations of the locomotion system. Although the workshop was entitled "Gait Analysis in Rehabilitation Medicine," the range of topics which gait encompasses is much broader than the classical definition of bi or quadri pedal motion might imply. Gait clinics and laboratories include analysis of many forms of human locomotion which often include the use of assistive devices such as crutches, canes, prosthetics, and wheelchairs.
    [Show full text]