June 24, 1991 Special

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

June 24, 1991 Special A G E N D A M eeting T ype : S D ate ' 06-24-199 1 S U B JE C T N O M IN A T IO N S O F B O A R D S A N D C O M M IS S IO N S S U P P LE M E N TA L A G E N D A C * of C hartotte, C * C lerk's O ffiœ V o tzn g D is t rzc t O p tzo n s O p t to n C - 1 Popu la tion D tfferen tia l 9 .851 V o t in g T o t a l Districts Population z Black (T0P) I Btack (VhP) I Btack (REG) 1 58 ,5 53 24 .96 2 1 .75 18 .5 7 2 57 .946 60 .8 7 56 .23 58 .10 3 56 ,093 56 .35 5 1 .6 1 54 .0 7 4 60 ,483 54 .76 50 .30 60 .22 5 60 ,899 13 .60 12 .68 12 .85 6 6 t ,762 4 .59 3 .9 1- 2 .43 7 6 1 ,9 75 3 .72 3 .2 1 2 .9 3 o p t i o n C - 2 P opu la tfon D zfferen tial 8 .99Z V o t in g T o ta l Districts Populaefon : Black (T0P) 5 Black (#AP) Z Black (RE6) 1 59 ,9 4 1 2 6 .0 8 2 2 .76 19 .5 8 2 5 6 ,60 9 58 .89 5 4 .2 2 5 5 .6 8 3 60 ,0 3 6 56 .3 9 5 1 .7 8 5 3 .9 7 4 56 ,6 3 5 5 5 .9 5 5 1 .4 9 6 1 .9 9 5 60 ,89 9 13 .60 12 .6 8 12 .85 6 6 1 ,6 16 4 .77 4 .17 2 .64 7 6 1 ,9 75 3 .72 3 .2 1 2 .9 3 O p t ion C -4 P opu la tto n D ifferen tia l 10 .02: v o txn g T o ta l Districts Populatlon Z Black (T0P) I Black (VAP) I Black (REG) 1 59 ,94 1 26 .08 22 .76 19 .58 2 5 6 ,60 9 5 8 .8 9 54 .2 2 5 5 .6 8 3 60 ,0 3 6 5 6 .39 5 1 .78 5 3 .9 7 4 56 .6 35 55 .95 5 1 .49 6 1 .99 5 60 ,759 13 .43 12 .0 3 1 1 .53 6 6 1 ,139 4 .97 4 .3 2 2 .70 7 62 ,59 2 4 .17 3 .76 3 .46 C ity of rh n rlot te J v o t 4n g b tst r ie t op t i on s ) P erc en t B lack . O p t io n x öp t ïon Y O p t i on Z < v/ t ing G en . 18 + Over R eg . G en . 1B + è ver Reg . Gen . 18 + Over R eg . ( D ist r ict s P op . Pop . V ote t s Pop . P op . Vote rs Pop . Pop . Vo ters ' 1 4 5 % 41% 42% 35 % 30 % 28% 35% 39% 28% 2 6 3% 5B% 59% 62% 57% 59% 61% 59% 60% 3 5 9% 55% 57% 66% 62% 63% 67% 63% 65% ) . 4 2 6% 23% 26% 30% 27% 3 1% 25% 22% 27% , 5 1 1% 10% 9% 11% 10 % 8% 8% 9% 8% ) 6 5 % 5% 3% 5% 4% 3% 5% 4% 3% 7 3% 3% 21 6% 5% 4% 6% 5% 4 % t ' (i ' ! o p t i on x 1 o pt i o n z 1 J V o t in g G e n . 1B + O v e r R e g . G en . 18 + O v e r R eg . : Districts Pop. Pop. Voters Pyp. Fop. Voters 1 3 6% 32% 3 2% 34% 30% 28% 2 6 5% 6 1% 62% 67% 62 % 63% 3 6 5% 6 1% 63& 66 % 6 2% 63% 4 2 5% 22% 25% 25% 22% 2B% 5 8% 9% 7% 10% 9% 8% 6 6% 5% 3% 5% 5% 3% 7 6% 5% 4% 6% 5% 4% O p t ion A opt to n B ( Votin g G en . 18 + O ver R eg . Gen . 18 + Q ger Reg . D i s t r i c t s P op . P op . V o t e r s P o p . P o p . v o te r s 1 55% 5ô% 48% 50% 46% 55 % 2 5 7% 53 % 56: 6 1% 5 6% 5B% 3 5 7% 53% 55% 6 1% 571 59% 4 2 6A 23% 26% 23% 2Q % 18% 5 t2% 11% 10% 11% 10% 9% 6 5% 5% 3% 5% 5% 3% 7 3% 3% 2% 3% 3% 2% tto u 1 Fl E 3 t.yyl q eXfOt cj Ro.s d G EO RG E Sulle 222 AN D REW S C harllm e N c INCO R K R ATED 2821 1 4 M ûrketlx ?04/366 0999 Deslgn Cb m m untcatdons Faz 366 8564 Statistics for the C harlotte R egion l'he fosîow lng pages contadn a synopm s of stattstlcs about the C harlotte R eglon. developed by the C harlotle C ham ber of C om m erce and com plled by Luqulre G eorge Andrew s. The slatlstscs show a slgnlflcant num ber of areas w here the reglon com petes w ell natlonally. and provlde an excellent bas's for fad ual Info rm atlon for adve rbslng and pfom otlon topy. I> 1 > z>- - G E N E R A L IN T O R M A T IO N P op ulatton C harlotte's U .S ranking in p op uladon: 35 C ity population' 400,303 C ounty popuh tion: 524,730 M SA population: 1 2 ntillion (42nd in nadon) C arolin as P artnersh lp p op u lah on : 1 5 m im on S fze: 5th largest u rb an reg ion m U .S T R A N SP O R T A T JO N T ru ckkng * znd largest trucking region in Southeast (1 term s of em ploym ent) * 11th largest k uckm g region in nahon * 1/3 of nah on 's top 100 m zcking G rm s h ave C h arlotte operations * 9 of top 10 e urking flrzns operate h& e * T ru ck dellveries to over 50% of n ation's p opu lad on w lthin 24 h ouzs of C h arlotte * 54% of U .S. popttlation w ithin 650 m iles ol C harlotte (only 45% for A tlanta and 39% for N ew Y ork) A trltn es * 21st Iargest airport in nadon (M th in w orld) * 432 airlm e fhgh ts d aily * 15 m ilhon passengers through airport each year * 95 m ilhon p ounds air freight shipped Annually 2 1. R azlw ay @ 275 k ain s p mss through G arlotte each w eek C IR T U R A L /EN T ER T A W M EN T * 4+ largest m ed ia m arket in U .S. * 9+ in U .S for contribuEons to the A rts & Sd ences (2 3 m illlon /year) * 3rd highest co n m bu tors to A rts & Sd encw bmsed on p er cap ita @ # 1 in N BA atten dance 2 of the lmst 3 years * znd largest attended U .S. sw rting event held at C M S (W orld 600) T R A D E A N D FW A N C E T rade * 6th largest w holesale center in U .S. (ove.r 21 billion/year) * 7th largest p ad m g area in U .S * 8th largest econom ic grow th by year 2000 F ina n ce @ 4th largest finand al center in U .S. (conk olling $105 bilhon in assets) #1 - N ew York w ith $729 bilhon #2 - San Frand sco w ith $164 billion #3 - Im s A ngeles w 1:11 $150 billion * zrtd m num ber of top 200 U .S. banks located in d ty. (6 of naEon's top 200 bankm in C harlotle O nly N .Y . has m ore.) * 2 of nad on's top 25 b anvs h ead qu artered in C h arlotte * 139 m ortgage banklng com panies in G arlotte (ind uding 11 of top 25) * 64 leasing com panies (transportation, equipm ent) in C harlotte * 78 firm s offer com m ercial finance and fad oring 3 . - . w - M 1 O U A LR Y O F Ln Cost oj Llvtng * Am on! 35 ddes of 730,000-500,000, (zharlot:e rankq 17th in cost of living lndex (101.1) * 29th low est in lodal Per cap ta taxes ($724 15). X .S average ts $1,681 18.) H cuslng * 19th m top 25 housing m arkets w ith 13.2% appred a:on and 15% inœ m e required for m ortgage in C harlotte * A verage hom e price is $112,800 for 2500 sq. ft. (A verage is $144.911 for 1850 sq ft ) * A verage lot size in C harlotte is 100. X 150'. C rtm e * 14th d ty (C harlotte) in c'n m es com znitted (=31,000/year) C ltm att * 60 m ean tem peram re for area (40.5 average in January/78 5 average in July) * 69% average hu m ldlty * 43 1'' pred pltahon /year * 241 surm y days/year 4 L A BO R C O N SID E R A X O N S 1 W ages * C harlotter mstonia-R ock H i11 area has low est average hottrly m anufacturing eam ings ($9.36) am ong southern M SA 's.
Recommended publications
  • Return of Private Foundation CT' 10 201Z '
    Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990 -PF or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust Department of the Treasury Treated as a Private Foundation Internal Revenue Service Note. The foundation may be able to use a copy of this return to satisfy state reporting requirem M11 For calendar year 20 11 or tax year beainnina . 2011. and ending . 20 Name of foundation A Employer Identification number THE PFIZER FOUNDATION, INC. 13-6083839 Number and street (or P 0 box number If mail is not delivered to street address ) Room/suite B Telephone number (see instructions) (212) 733-4250 235 EAST 42ND STREET City or town, state, and ZIP code q C If exemption application is ► pending, check here • • • • • . NEW YORK, NY 10017 G Check all that apply Initial return Initial return of a former public charity D q 1 . Foreign organizations , check here . ► Final return Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, check here and attach Address chang e Name change computation . 10. H Check type of organization' X Section 501( exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated Section 4947 ( a)( 1 ) nonexem pt charitable trust Other taxable p rivate foundation q 19 under section 507(b )( 1)(A) , check here . ► Fair market value of all assets at end J Accounting method Cash X Accrual F If the foundation is in a60-month termination of year (from Part Il, col (c), line Other ( specify ) ---- -- ------ ---------- under section 507(b)(1)(B),check here , q 205, 8, 166. 16) ► $ 04 (Part 1, column (d) must be on cash basis) Analysis of Revenue and Expenses (The (d) Disbursements total of amounts in columns (b), (c), and (d) (a) Revenue and (b) Net investment (c) Adjusted net for charitable may not necessanly equal the amounts in expenses per income income Y books purposes C^7 column (a) (see instructions) .) (cash basis only) I Contribution s odt s, grants etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Listening Patterns – 2 About the Study Creating the Format Groups
    SSRRGG PPuubblliicc RRaaddiioo PPrrooffiillee TThhee PPuubblliicc RRaaddiioo FFoorrmmaatt SSttuuddyy LLiisstteenniinngg PPaatttteerrnnss AA SSiixx--YYeeaarr AAnnaallyyssiiss ooff PPeerrffoorrmmaannccee aanndd CChhaannggee BByy SSttaattiioonn FFoorrmmaatt By Thomas J. Thomas and Theresa R. Clifford December 2005 STATION RESOURCE GROUP 6935 Laurel Avenue Takoma Park, MD 20912 301.270.2617 www.srg.org TThhee PPuubblliicc RRaaddiioo FFoorrmmaatt SSttuuddyy:: LLiisstteenniinngg PPaatttteerrnnss Each week the 393 public radio organizations supported by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting reach some 27 million listeners. Most analyses of public radio listening examine the performance of individual stations within this large mix, the contributions of specific national programs, or aggregate numbers for the system as a whole. This report takes a different approach. Through an extensive, multi-year study of 228 stations that generate about 80% of public radio’s audience, we review patterns of listening to groups of stations categorized by the formats that they present. We find that stations that pursue different format strategies – news, classical, jazz, AAA, and the principal combinations of these – have experienced significantly different patterns of audience growth in recent years and important differences in key audience behaviors such as loyalty and time spent listening. This quantitative study complements qualitative research that the Station Resource Group, in partnership with Public Radio Program Directors, and others have pursued on the values and benefits listeners perceive in different formats and format combinations. Key findings of The Public Radio Format Study include: • In a time of relentless news cycles and a near abandonment of news by many commercial stations, public radio’s news and information stations have seen a 55% increase in their average audience from Spring 1999 to Fall 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Updated: January 2021 Curriculum Vitae Christopher J. Ruhm Home Address: Work Address: 3638 Twin Creeks Road Frank Batten School of Leadership & Public Policy Charlottesville, VA 22901 University of Virginia (336) 254-6307 P.O. Box 400893 [email protected] Charlottesville, VA 22904-4893 (434) 243-3729 [email protected] sites.google.com/view/christopher-ruhm/ Education University of California, Berkeley, Ph.D. 1984 University of California, Berkeley, M.A. 1981 University of California, Davis, B.A. (with highest honors) 1978 Fields of Specialization: Health Economics, Labor Economics, Public Economics Teaching, Research, and Other Experience Professor of Public Policy and Economics, Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy, University of Virginia, 2010-present Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, 2013-2015 Other Responsibilities: Executive Committee, Frank Batten School (2017-2019) Executive Board Member, Center for Health Policy (2014-2016) Contemplative Council/Directing Circle, Contemplative Sciences Center (2014-present) Dean’s Search Committee, Frank Batten School (2013-2014) Fellow, Center for Health Policy (2012-present) Deans Council, Frank Batten School (2012-2013) Personnel Committee (chair), Frank Batten School (2012-2013) Admissions Committee, Frank Batten School (2012-2013) Faculty Search Committee, Frank Batten School (2010-present, committee chair multiple years) Faculty Search Committee, Economics Department (2015-2017) Faculty Senate, UVA (2011-2012) Department of Economics, Joseph M. Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina Greensboro, 1991-2010. (Professor Emeritus, 2011-present, Jefferson- Pilot Excellence Professor of Economics, 1997-2010; Professor of Economics, 1994- 1997; Associate Professor of Economics, 1991-1994.) Other Responsibilities: ruhmcv.pdf Christopher J. Ruhm Page 2 Economics Department Graduate Program Committee (1991-2010).
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2016 and FY 2018
    Corporation for Public Broadcasting Appropriation Request and Justification FY2016 and FY2018 Submitted to the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee and the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Subcommittee of the Senate Appropriations Committee February 2, 2015 This document with links to relevant public broadcasting sites is available on our Web site at: www.cpb.org Table of Contents Financial Summary …………………………..........................................................1 Narrative Summary…………………………………………………………………2 Section I – CPB Fiscal Year 2018 Request .....……………………...……………. 4 Section II – Interconnection Fiscal Year 2016 Request.………...…...…..…..… . 24 Section III – CPB Fiscal Year 2016 Request for Ready To Learn ……...…...…..39 FY 2016 Proposed Appropriations Language……………………….. 42 Appendix A – Inspector General Budget………………………..……..…………43 Appendix B – CPB Appropriations History …………………...………………....44 Appendix C – Formula for Allocating CPB’s Federal Appropriation………….....46 Appendix D – CPB Support for Rural Stations …………………………………. 47 Appendix E – Legislative History of CPB’s Advance Appropriation ………..…. 49 Appendix F – Public Broadcasting’s Interconnection Funding History ….…..…. 51 Appendix G – Ready to Learn Research and Evaluation Studies ……………….. 53 Appendix H – Excerpt from the Report on Alternative Sources of Funding for Public Broadcasting Stations ……………………………………………….…… 58 Appendix I – State Profiles…...………………………………………….….…… 87 Appendix J – The President’s FY 2016 Budget Request...…...…………………131 0 FINANCIAL SUMMARY OF THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING’S (CPB) BUDGET REQUESTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016/2018 FY 2018 CPB Funding The Corporation for Public Broadcasting requests a $445 million advance appropriation for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018. This is level funding compared to the amount provided by Congress for both FY 2016 and FY 2017, and is the amount requested by the Administration for FY 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • PRNDI Awards 2018 Division AA (Stations with 16 Or More Full-Time
    PRNDI Awards 2018 Division AA (Stations with 16 or more full-time news staff) Arts Feature First Place KUT 90.5 FM - “Moments” Second Place KCUR - “Getting Dragged Down By The News? This Kansas City Gospel Singer Has A Message For You” Best Multi-Media Presentation First Place WFPL / Kentucky Public Radio - “The Pope's Long Con” Second Place KERA - 90.1 Dallas - “One Crisis Away: No Place To Go” Best Use of Sound First Place Michigan Radio - “Artisans of Michigan: Making Marimbas” Second Place Georgia Public Broadcasting - “Breathing In ATL's Underwater Hockey Scene” Best Writing First Place KJZZ 91.5 FM - “Christmas Stuffing: AZ Class Beginners to Taxidermy” Second Place KJZZ 91.5 FM - “Earth & Bone - Havasupai Stand Up to Mining Company” pg. 1 PRNDI Awards 2018 Breaking News First Place KUOW-FM - “Train Derailment” Second Place Georgia Public Broadcasting - “Hurricane Irma” Call-in Program First Place WBUR - “Free Speech Controversy Erupts At Middlebury College” Second Place Vermont Public Radio - “Who Gets To Call Themselves A 'Vermonter'?” Commentary First Place KUOW-FM - “I stopped learning Farsi. I stopped kissing the Quran. I wanted to be normal” Second Place KCUR - “More Than Just Armchair Gamers” Continuing Coverage First Place Chicago Public Radio/WBEZ - “Every Other Hour” Second Place St. Louis Public Radio - “Stockley Verdict and Ongoing Protests” Enterprise/Investigative First Place KERA - 90.1 Dallas - “The West Dallas Housing Crisis” Second Place KJZZ 91.5 FM - “On The Inside: The Chaos of AZ Prison Health Care” pg. 2 PRNDI Awards 2018 Interview First Place KCFR - Colorado Public Radio - “The Aurora Theater Shooting Recasts In Sickness And In Health' For One Family” Second Place WHYY - FM - “Vietnam War memories” Long Documentary First Place Michigan Radio - “Pushed Out: A documentary on housing in Grand Rapids” Second Place KUT 90.5 FM - “Texas Standard: The Wall” Nationally Edited Breaking News First Place KERA - 90.1 Dallas - “Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment a DA 19-526 Renewal of License Applications Accepted for Filing
    Attachment A DA 19-526 Renewal of License Applications Accepted for Filing File Number Service Callsign Facility ID Frequency City State Licensee 0000072254 FL WMVK-LP 124828 107.3 MHz PERRYVILLE MD STATE OF MARYLAND, MDOT, MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMN. 0000072255 FL WTTZ-LP 193908 93.5 MHz BALTIMORE MD STATE OF MARYLAND, MDOT, MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION 0000072258 FX W253BH 53096 98.5 MHz BLACKSBURG VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072259 FX W247CQ 79178 97.3 MHz LYNCHBURG VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072260 FX W264CM 93126 100.7 MHz MARTINSVILLE VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072261 FX W279AC 70360 103.7 MHz ROANOKE VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072262 FX W243BT 86730 96.5 MHz WAYNESBORO VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072263 FX W241AL 142568 96.1 MHz MARION VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072265 FM WVRW 170948 107.7 MHz GLENVILLE WV DELLA JANE WOOFTER 0000072267 AM WESR 18385 1330 kHz ONLEY-ONANCOCK VA EASTERN SHORE RADIO, INC. 0000072268 FM WESR-FM 18386 103.3 MHz ONLEY-ONANCOCK VA EASTERN SHORE RADIO, INC. 0000072270 FX W289CE 157774 105.7 MHz ONLEY-ONANCOCK VA EASTERN SHORE RADIO, INC. 0000072271 FM WOTR 1103 96.3 MHz WESTON WV DELLA JANE WOOFTER 0000072274 AM WHAW 63489 980 kHz LOST CREEK WV DELLA JANE WOOFTER 0000072285 FX W206AY 91849 89.1 MHz FRUITLAND MD CALVARY CHAPEL OF TWIN FALLS, INC. 0000072287 FX W284BB 141155 104.7 MHz WISE VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072288 FX W295AI 142575 106.9 MHz MARION VA POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RADIO, INC. 0000072293 FM WXAF 39869 90.9 MHz CHARLESTON WV SHOFAR BROADCASTING CORPORATION 0000072294 FX W204BH 92374 88.7 MHz BOONES MILL VA CALVARY CHAPEL OF TWIN FALLS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Creation of a Low Power Radio Service, MM Docket No
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-349 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Creation of Low ) Power Radio Service ) MM Docket No. 99-25 ) ) ) RM-9208 ) RM-9242 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION Adopted: September 20, 2000 Released: September 28, 2000 By the Commission: Chairman Kennard and Commissioner Ness issuing separate statements; Commissioner Furchtgott-Roth dissenting and issuing a statement; and Commissioner Powell concurring in part, dissenting in part and issuing a statement. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................................1 II. ISSUE ANALYSIS .....................................................................................................................5 A. Technical Rules...............................................................................................................5 1. Second and Third Adjacent Channel Protection ......................................................5 2. Regulatory Status of LPFM Stations ...................................................................27 3. Modulation..........................................................................................................31 4. Cut-Off Date for Protection of Full Service Stations ............................................33 5. Protection of Cable Television Headend...............................................................36 6. Translators..........................................................................................................37
    [Show full text]
  • The Piedmont View
    The Piedmont View A MEMBERSHIP NEWSLETTER OF THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL AUTUMN 2018 IN THIS ISSUE Award-Winning Meet Farmer Protects PAGE 2 PEC Staff Farmland for Future Generations By Paula Combs estled at the bottom Soil and Water Conservation of Clark Mountain and District and USDA’s Natural along the Rapidan Resources Conservation Service. River in Orange County, “We want our kids to be able NGlenmary Farm sits on some of the to farm and provide for future best agricultural soils in Virginia. generations. And that's kind of Its rich farming history dates back the whole goal of this,” said Tom Glenmary Farm owners, Tom and Kim Nixon, with their daughter Water Quality to the eighteenth century. Nixon, who owns and operates Elizabeth and son Robert. The Nixon family purchased Glenmary Farm with his wife PAGE Results 3 the property in 1980, and the Kim. “Both of our children have mechanics. associated with donated farm has since become an award- developed a strong passion for “We look at all the different conservation easements, so they winning cattle, turkey and grain working on our farm and for farms in the area and in other pursued a different option. operation. today’s agricultural industry.” places — families we know — and In a unique approach to This past summer, in an effort With complementary many are struggling to survive in private lands protection, PEC to preserve the prime farmland interests, their daughter Elizabeth, agriculture,” said Tom. partnered with NRCS and the and help ensure continued a 2016 Oklahoma State graduate, “The older I get the more I Culpeper SWCD to help the Nixon operations, the Nixons chose to helps manage the cowherd and hate to see farmland being lost,” family leverage funding from the permanently protect 382 acres of handles communications, and added Kim.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Table of Contents a Message from the Board
    TABLE OF CONTENTS A MESSAGE FROM THE BOARD ...............................................................................................3 A MESSAGE FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT ..........................................................................4 A MESSAGE FROM THE HIGH SCHOOL PRINCIPAL ............................................................5 MISSION STATEMENT ................................................................................................................6 VISION STATEMENT ...................................................................................................................6 PHILOSOPHY OF LIBERTY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY .............................................................6 LCA HONOR CODE ......................................................................................................................7 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................11 LCA CORE VALUES ...................................................................................................................13 ACADEMIC GUIDELINES .........................................................................................................13 ACCREDITATION .......................................................................................................................14 ADMISSION TO LIBERTY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY..............................................................14 AFTER SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ...................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Public Radio in Mid America
    APPENDIX A To PRROs Comments SUMMARY OF STATISTICS IN APPENDIX A Total Number of Public Radio FM Translator Stations in Appendix A 220 100% of those reporting Total (Combined) Estimated Population Served for Public Radio 4,852,610 persons - FM Translators in Appendix A Total Number of Rural Communities Served by Public 152 69.09% of those Radio FM Translator Stations in reporting Appendix A Total Number of Public Radio FM Translators in Appendix A that used 111 50.45% of those Federal Money for Translator reporting Projects Total Number of Public Radio FM Translators in Appendix A that used 100 45.45% of those or rely on Local Fundraising for reporting Translator Projects WRVO, OSWEGO, NY Station Call Sign: WRVO Number of Main Stations: 4 Number of Translators: 11 cp’s not on air – 1 “frozen application” Call Signs and City of License of All Translators (attach list): W260BE Watertown NY W291BB Boonville NY W277BK Woodgate NY W261BB Steuben NY W237CC Rome NY W222AT Hamilton NY W293BE Norwich NY W241AW Geneva NY W238AT Cortlandville NY W237BJ Dryden NY W272BQ Marathon NY BNPFT-20030310BBB Ithaca NY (Pending) Estimated Population Served by All Translators: 65,000 Are any of your translators “daisy chained” (ie, one feeding another): yes How Many of Your Translators Serve Rural Communities: 9 How Many Translators Were Constructed with Federal Financial Assistance: PTFP Pending How Many Translators Were Constructed Pursuant to Local Fundraising Campaigns? All but Watertown were the result of grassroots campaigns. Watertown fills in a shadow in WRVJ’s null toward Canada. What factors prompted your decision to construct these translators? WRVO Page 2 In each case listeners had been using extraordinary means to receive WRVO or one of its class A relays.
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberty Champion, Volume 14, Issue 18)
    Scholars Crossing 1996 -- 1997 Liberty University School Newspaper 2-11-1997 02-11-97 (The Liberty Champion, Volume 14, Issue 18) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/paper_96_97 Recommended Citation "02-11-97 (The Liberty Champion, Volume 14, Issue 18)" (1997). 1996 -- 1997. 18. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/paper_96_97/18 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberty University School Newspaper at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1996 -- 1997 by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Special Life! '.This year's newest engagementsUP1 fl10H! Writers offer point-counterpoint Liberty University, Lynchburg, Va Tuesday, February 11, 1997 Vol. 14, No. Forbes critiques society The publishing magnate then moved After the message, Forbes said he By TIMOTHY J. GIBBONS Into a discussion of his flat tax propos­ particularly believes that Liberty stu­ Editor in Chief al, the Idea which was the focus of his dents could be the ones to restore the In a speech designed to persuade 1996 political campaign. American nation. "They can make it happen," he Liberty students that "they can make It families are now paying more In taxes said. "Especially with the tools coming happen," former GOP presidential than for food, clothing and shelter out of this new era, you have the tools hopeful Steve Forbes described the combined, he said. at your fingertips." conflicts he feels America Is facing and Taxes are not Just a means of col­ Forbes came to Liberty at the invita­ offered a variety of economic and cul­ lecting revenue," Forbes said.
    [Show full text]
  • MF01/N06 Plus Postage
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 292 440 IR 013 191 TITLE A Report to the People. 20Years of Your National Commitment to Public Broadcasting, 1967-1987. 1986 Annual Report. INSTITUTION Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Washington, D.C. REPORT NO ISBN-0-89776-100-6 PUB DATE [15 May 87] NOTE 129p.; Photographs will not reproduce well. PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/n06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annual Reports; Cultural Enrichment; Educational Radio; *Educational Television; *Financial Support; *Programing (Broadcast); *Public Television; *Television Viewing IDENTIFIERS *Annenberg CPB Project; *Corporation for Public Broadcasting ABSTRACT This annual report for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) for fiscal year 1986 also summarizes the CPB's activities over the last 20 years. The front inside cover folds out to three pages and provides a chronology of the important events in CPB history from its inception in 1967 to 1987. A narrative report on the CPB's 20 years of operation highlights its beginnings, milestones, programming, and audiences; the broadcasting system; and funding. Comments in support of public television by a wide variety of public figures concludes this portion of the report. The 1986 annual report provides information on television programming, radio programming, community outreach, adult learning, program support activities, and system support activities for that fiscal year. The CPB Board of Directors and officers are also listed, and a financial accounting by the firm of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. is provided. The text is supplemented by a number of graphs, figures, and photographs. (EW) ********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]