DOCSLIB.ORG

Identifying the Causes and Finding Solutions for Delays in Disposal of Criminal Appeals: Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Identifying the Causes and Finding Solutions for Delays in Disposal of Criminal Appeals: Final Report Identifying the Causes and Finding Solutions for Delays in Disposal of Criminal Appeals: Final Report This report is a commissioned piece of work by the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy under the Scheme for Action Research and Studies on Judicial Reforms of the Department of Justice. About the Authors Shreya Tripathy, Chitrakshi Jain and Aditya Ranjan are Research Fellows at the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, New Delhi working for the JALDI (Justice, Access and Lowering Delays in India) Initiative. The authors would like to thank Shri Barun Mitra (Secretary, Justice), Shri G.R. Raghavender (Joint Secretary, National Mission for Justice Delivery & Legal Reforms), Smt. Premlata Kaushik (Dy. Secretary, JR) and the Department of Justice, Ministry of Law & Justice for giving us the opportunity to work on this project under the Scheme for Action Research and Studies on Judicial Reforms. The authors are extremely thankful to Hon’ble Justice P.N. Prakash and Hon’ble Justice and Hon’ble Justice S. Nagamuthu for their valuable insights during the internal consultation held for the report. The authors are also thankful to Mr. Manas Gawankar (Advocate, Bombay High Court), Mr. Varad Nath (Advocate, Rajasthan High Court) and Mr. Pranesh Misra (Advocate, Delhi High Court) for their inputs during the consultation. The comments and views expressed during the consultation have added valuable insights to this final output. The authors are also grateful to Ameen Jauhar (Senior Resident Fellow) and Deepika Kinhal (Senior Resident Fellow) for their review and inputs. The authors would also like to thank Vaidehi Misra (Research Fellow) and Megha Katheria (associate Fellow) for their contribution to the Report. The authors are also extremely thankful to Mr. Satishwar Kedas and Dr. Sushant Sinha for their help in procuring data for this report. The author would also like to thank Development Data Lab for providing data for procuring data from the e-Courts website and making it openly available for researchers. The authors would also like to thank Vidhi Kautilya Fellows Anmol Gupta, Ankita Kamath, Arush Mittal, Ayushi Gupta, Mehak Jain, Mishika Bedi, Shinjini Mitra and Shubham Dhamelia, and Vidhi interns Anshika Kesarwani and Arjun Butani, for their assistance on the report. The errors, if any, rest with the authors. For more information, see www.vidhilegalpolicy.in. Contact us at [email protected]. July 2021. 4 Identifying Causes and Finding Solutions for Delay in Disposal of Criminal Appeals Contents Part I .................................................................................................................................................... 12 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Need to Study Delay in the Criminal Justice Administration.......................................................... 16 Research Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 18 Right to Timely Justice ....................................................................................................................... 22 Legal Framework for Criminal Appeals ........................................................................................... 24 Appeals to the Supreme Court ............................................................................................................. 24 Appeals to the High Courts .................................................................................................................. 25 Bail pending appeal and suspension of sentence................................................................................... 25 Supreme Court’s Recent Intervention ................................................................................................... 26 Measures to deal with old Criminal Appeals .......................................................................................... 28 Case Data Analysis: Supreme Court and High Courts ..................................................................... 29 Analysis of Filing Patterns .................................................................................................................... 32 Analysis of Pending Cases................................................................................................................... 34 Analysis of Disposed Cases ................................................................................................................. 40 Relationship between the length of the case and nature of offences ....................................................... 43 Relationship between length of a case and the range of punishment....................................................... 47 Case Data Analysis: District Courts................................................................................................... 49 Analysis of Pending Cases................................................................................................................... 52 Analysis of Disposed Cases ................................................................................................................. 57 Relationship between the length of the case and nature of offences ....................................................... 61 Relationship between length of a case and the range of punishment....................................................... 63 Approaches to Judicial Reforms ........................................................................................................ 64 Specific attempts to fasten disposal of Criminal Appeals ........................................................................ 64 Considerations While Reforming the Administration of Criminal Justice in India...................... 67 Recommendations .............................................................................................................................. 69 Part II ................................................................................................................................................... 74 Assessing Recent Developments Made to Address Backlog and Delay in the Criminal Justice System ................................................................................................................................................. 75 Why have the past attempts at digitisation of courts not meaningfully informed legal reforms? .................. 75 Why has plea bargaining failed to achieve its desired goals of reducing backlog and the prison population? .......................................................................................................................................................... 77 How have the recent attempts to digitise the adjudication of cases in the Negotiable Instruments Act fared? .......................................................................................................................................................... 78 Annexures ........................................................................................................................................... 81 5 Executive Summary Part I Background Pendency and delay are endemic to courts in India. While the total volume of cases pending across all the courts is staggering, it is necessary to unpack the pendency numbers court-wise and across different categories of cases to properly understand the causes of delay. Pendency in Criminal Appeals is particularly alarming since the number of cases pending for more than ten years across many High Courts is very high. If we categorise cases based on time taken for disposal within a High Court, a clear pattern emerges which suggests that Criminal Appeals take the longest to dispose of. This research attempts to understand the reasons behind delay in adjudication of Criminal Appeals and aims to devise solutions to the problem. Methodology For this purpose, we are studying the criminal appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India, and four state High Courts (i.e., Allahabad, Bombay, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan). These courts report some of the highest pendency figures when it comes to Criminal Appeals. The research also delves into some District Courts under the jurisdiction of the respective High Courts. In addition to reviewing the existing policy and academic literature on the issue of arrears and delay in criminal cases in general and Criminal Appeals in particular. The research has employed mixed methods to analyse cases before the selected courts. For quantitative case data analysis, meta data stored on the High Court servers has been collected for a period of ten years and data has been analysed for trends in disposal and pendency. The data for the District Courts has been sourced from the e-Courts data made available by the DDL Judicial Data Portal. For the qualitative analysis, stakeholder consultations have been undertaken to identify the challenges faced by them in criminal justice administration. Key Issues addressed Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction The primary function of appeals is to “protect against miscarriages of justice”. This report undertakes an in- depth analysis of the criminal appellate jurisdiction of the High Courts and the Supreme Court in India under Chapter XXIX of the Cr.PC. Sections 374-378 of the Cr.PC which deal with Criminal Appeals to the High Court and the Supreme Court which are relevant for the purposes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Indian Law Reports (Cuttack Series)
    THE INDIAN LAW REPORTS (CUTTACK SERIES) Containing Judgments of the High Court of Orissa and some important decisions of the Supreme Court of India. Mode of Citation 2018 (I) I L R - CUT . JUNE - 2018 Pages : 1010 to 1177 Edited By BIKRAM KISHORE NAYAK, ADVOCATE LAW REPORTER HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK. Published by : High Court of Orissa. At/PO-Chandini Chowk, Cuttack-753002 Printed at - Odisha Government Press, Madhupatna, Cuttack-10 Annual Subscription : 300/- All Rights Reserved. Every care has been taken to avoid any mistake or omission. The Publisher, Editor or Printer would not be held liable in any manner to any person by reason of any mistake or omission in this publication ii ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK CHIEF JUSTICE The Hon’ble Shri Justice VINEET SARAN , B.A., LL.B. PUISNE JUDGES The Hon’ble Shri Justice INDRAJIT MAHANTY, LL.M. The Hon’ble Justice KUMARI SANJU PANDA, B.A., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice S.C. PARIJA, LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice S.K. MISHRA, M.Com., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice C.R. DASH, LL.M. The Hon’ble Shri Justice Dr. A.K. RATH, LL.M., Ph.D. The Hon’ble Shri Justice BISWAJIT MOHANTY, M.A., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice Dr. B.R. SARANGI, B.Com.(Hons.), LL.M., Ph.D. The Hon’ble Shri Justice DEBABRATA DASH, B.Sc. (Hons.), LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice BISWANATH RATH, B.A., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice S.K. SAHOO, B.Sc., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Supreme Court and High Courts Judges (As on 01.02.2021)
    AS ON 01/02/2021 JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND THE HIGH COURTS (List of Judges arranged according to date of initial appointment) [Sanctioned Strength of Judges of High Court also includes the Chief Justice of High Court] AS ON 01/02/2021 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sanctioned Judge Strength: 34 (List of Judges arranged according to date of appointment) Sl. Name of the Judge Date of Date of REMARKS No. S/Shri Justice appointment Retirement [Parent High Court] 1 SHARAD ARVIND BOBDE 12/04/2013 23/04/2021 CJI W.E.F. 18.11.2019 [BOMBAY] 2 NUTHALAPATI VENKATA RAMANA 17/02/2014 26/08/2022 ANDHRA PRADESH 3 ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN 07/07/2014 12/08/2021 BAR 4 UDAY UMESH LALIT 13/08/2014 08/11/2022 BAR 5 AJAY MANIKRAO KHANWILKAR 13/05/2016 29/07/2022 BOMBAY 6 DR. DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD 13/05/2016 10/11/2024 BOMBAY 7 ASHOK BHUSHAN 13/05/2016 04/07/2021 ALLAHABAD 8 LAVU NAGESWARA RAO 13/05/2016 07/06/2022 BAR 9 SANJAY KISHAN KAUL 17/02/2017 25/12/2023 DELHI 10 SHANTANAGOUDAR MOHAN MALLIKARJUNAGOUDA 17/02/2017 04/05/2023 KARNATAKA 11 S. ABDUL NAZEER 17/02/2017 04/01/2023 KARANTAKA 12 NAVIN SINHA 17/02/2017 18/08/2021 PATNA 13 MS. INDU MALHOTRA 27/04/2018 13/03/2021 BAR 14 KUMARI INDIRA BANERJEE 07/08/2018 23/09/2022 CALCUTTA 15 VINEET SARAN 07/08/2018 10/05/2022 ALLAHABAD 16 KUTTIYIL MATHEW JOSEPH 07/08/2018 16/06/2023 KERALA 17 HEMANT GUPTA [H] 02/11/2018 16/10/2022 PUNJAB & HARYANA 18 RAMAYYAGARI SUBHASH REDDY 02/11/2018 04/01/2022 TELANGANA 19 MUKESHKUMAR RASIKBHAI SHAH 02/11/2018 15/05/2023 GUJARAT 20 AJAY RASTOGI 02/11/2018 17/06/2023 RAJASTHAN 21 DINESH MAHESHWARI 18/01/2019 14/05/2023 RAJASTHAN 22 SANJIV KHANNA 18/01/2019 13/05/2025 DELHI 23 BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI 24/05/2019 23/11/2025 BOMBAY 24 SURYA KANT 24/05/2019 09/02/2027 PUNJAB & HARYANA 25 ANIRUDDHA BOSE 24/05/2019 10/04/2024 CALCUTTA 26 AJJIKUTTIRA SOMAIAH BOPANNA 24/05/2019 19/05/2024 KARNATAKA 27 KRISHNA MURARI 23/09/2019 08/07/2023 ALLAHABAD 28 SHRIPATHI RAVINDRA BHAT 23/09/2019 20/10/2023 DELHI 29 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Preview Current Affairs August 2018
    Current Affairs – August 2018 Current Affairs ─ August 2018 This is a guide to provide you a precise summary and a huge collection of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) covering national and international current affairs for the month of August 2018. This guide will help you in preparing for Indian competitive examinations like Bank PO, Banking, Railway, IAS, PCS, UPSC, CAT, GATE, CDS, NDA, MCA, MBA, Engineering, IBPS, Clerical Gradeand Officer Grade, etc. Audience Aspirants who are preparing for different competitive exams like Bank PO, Banking, Railway, IAS, PCS, UPSC, CAT, GATE, CDS, NDA, MCA, MBA, Engineering, IBPS, Clerical Grade, Officer Grade, etc. Even though you are not preparing for any exams but are willing to have news encapsulated in a roll, which you can walk through within 30 minutes, then we have put all the major points for the whole month in a precise and interesting way. Copyright and Disclaimer Copyright 2018 by Tutorials Point (I) Pvt. Ltd. All the content and graphics published in this e-book are the property of Tutorials Point (I) Pvt. Ltd. The user of this e-book is prohibited to reuse, retain, copy, distribute or republish any contents or a part of contents of this e-book in any manner without written consent of the publisher. We strive to update the contents of our website and tutorials as timely and as precisely as possible, however, the contents may contain inaccuracies or errors. Tutorials Point (I) Pvt. Ltd. provides no guarantee regarding the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of our website or its contents including this tutorial.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indian Law Reports
    THE INDIAN LAW REPORTS (CUTTACK SERIES) Containing Judgments of the High Court of Orissa and some important decisions of the Supreme Court of India. Mode of Citation 2018 (I) I L R - CUT . MAY - 2018 Pages : 859 to 1010 Edited By BIKRAM KISHORE NAYAK, ADVOCATE LAW REPORTER HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK. Published by : High Court of Orissa. At/PO-Chandini Chowk, Cuttack-753002 Printed at - Odisha Government Press, Madhupatna, Cuttack-10 Annual Subscription : 300/- All Rights Reserved. Every care has been taken to avoid any mistake or omission. The Publisher, Editor or Printer would not be held liable in any manner to any person by reason of any mistake or omission in this publication. ii ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK CHIEF JUSTICE The Hon’ble Shri Justice VINEET SARAN , B.A., LL.B. PUISNE JUDGES The Hon’ble Shri Justice INDRAJIT MAHANTY, LL.M. The Hon’ble Justice KUMARI SANJU PANDA, B.A., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice S.C. PARIJA, LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice S.K. MISHRA, M.Com., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice C.R. DASH, LL.M. The Hon’ble Shri Justice Dr. A.K. RATH, LL.M., Ph.D. The Hon’ble Shri Justice BISWAJIT MOHANTY, M.A., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice Dr. B.R. SARANGI, B.Com.(Hons.), LL.M., Ph.D. The Hon’ble Shri Justice DEBABRATA DASH, B.Sc. (Hons.), LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice BISWANATH RATH, B.A., LL.B. The Hon’ble Shri Justice S.K. SAHOO, B.Sc., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Chambers of Hon'ble the Chief Justice
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 14-09-2021 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN (TIME : 1:25 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1001 Diary No. 6374-2021 MONAPPA KOTTARI(D) BY LRS. IV-A Versus DAVID PINTO AND ANR. IN C.A. No. - 2742/2009, IA No. 34886/2021 - APPLICATION FOR LISTING REVIEW PETITION IN OPEN COURT IA No. 34885/2021 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION NEW DELHI 09-09-2021 16:10:18 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 14-09-2021 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL (TIME : 1:30 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1001 Diary No. 23889-2019 AYUB ALI MOLLA II-B Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL IN SLP(Crl) No. - 589/2015, IN SLP(Crl) No. - 590/2015, IA No. 99094/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION NEW DELHI 09-09-2021 16:10:27 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 14-09-2021 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH (TIME : 1:35 PM) SNo.
    [Show full text]
  • FAREWELL REFERENCE SPEECH ** Esteemed Brother Hon'ble Mr
    -1- FAREWELL REFERENCE SPEECH ----**---- Esteemed brother Hon©ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Yadav, Senior Judge, Allahabad High Court, My sister and brother judges, My most precious guest, adorable friend and companion Hon©ble Justice Ajay Rastogi, Judge, Supreme Court of India, Shri Shashi Prakash Singh, Additional Solicitor General of India, Shri Raghvendra Singh, Advocate General, State of Uttar Pradesh, Shri Amrendra Nath Singh, President, High Court Bar Association, Shri A.D. Saunders, President, Advocates© Association, Sri Ashok Nigam, Chairman, Elders Committee, Awadh Bar Association Learned Senior Advocates at Allahabad and Lucknow, Other Members of the Bar at Allahabad and Lucknow, Officers of the Registry, Ladies and Gentlemen. ----**---- Our hearing buds always wish to taste good sweet words of praise. Embellished version of your abilities, virtues and qualities gives us a deep satisfaction. A courtesy thus, developed in Courts too to applaud performance of a retiring Judge. Brother Justice Sanjay Yadav and all other respected representatives of Bar are highly generous in projecting my performance and abilities with extra glitter. -2- My humble gratitude to Hon©ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Yadav and revered speakers. Ladies and gentlemen, Its time to say good-bye. Good-bye not to Uttar Pradesh, Good-bye not to Allahabad or Lucknow. Good-bye not to any of my friend, but yes, its time to say good-bye to my constitutional adjudicating authority. In future, I may have any other authority on this globe but will not have this pious adjudicating authority under the Constitution of India. On being tested COVID-19 positive, unfortunately I lost my precious last five working days, I am attending this ceremony too from my residence.
    [Show full text]
  • I) Ilr - Cut-363 (S.C.
    2017 (I) ILR - CUT-363 (S.C.) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ARUN MISHRA,J. & DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3049 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) NO. 32285 OF 2015) JAYAKANTHAM & ORS. ........Appellants .Vrs. ABAYKUMAR ........Respondent SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 – S. 20 (1),(2) Decree of specific performance – When to be granted ? – Though it is the discretionary power of the Court, such discretion should not be arbitrary but the same must be sound and reasonable being guided by judicial principles, capable of correction by a Court of appeal – It is also not always necessary to grant specific performance merely because it is lawful to do so but the Court must consider, whether a party is trying to take undue advantage over the other and the hardship that may be caused to the defendant by directing specific performance. In this case the father of the respondent-plaintiff carried on money lending business and the defendants had a transaction of loan with the father of the respondent and inorder to return the loan of Rs. 1,00, 000/- agreement to sell was executed – So the terms of contract and the conduct of the parties at the time of entering into the agreement gave the plaintiff an unfair advantage over the defendant which makes it inequitable to enforce specific performance and in the above back ground a decree for payment of compensation in lieu of specific performance would meet the ends of justice – Held, the decree for specific performance is set aside and shall stand substituted with a direction to the appellants to pay rupees fifteen lakhs to the respondent in lieu of specific performance – Such amount shall be paid within two months from the date of receipt of a copy this judgment, failing which the amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9 % per annum.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of India [ It Will Be Appreciated If
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 21-01-2020 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA (TIME : 10:30 AM) 108 C.A. No. 8670/2012 IX UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus MOHD.ASLAM SAYEED 108. 1 Connected C.A. No. 8667/2012 IX THE COMMR.OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE),MUMBAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1] Versus M/S PARAGON ASSETS CO.LTD.. THROUGH MANAGER AND ORS. PURNIMA BHAT[R-1], R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1], PRAVEEN KUMAR[R-1], E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1] 108. 2 Connected C.A. No. 8672/2012 IX COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(PREVENTIVE) B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus ABDUL SATTAR 108. 3 Connected C.A. No. 8673/2012 IX COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(PREVENTIVE) B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus BAJIRAO P. GHOSALKAR 108. 4 Connected C.A. No. 1564-1567/2018 III COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) MUMBAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1] Versus JAGSON INTERNATION LTD. K. V. MOHAN[R- 111 C.A. No. 5669-5670/2009 XII COMMR.OF CEN.EXC-I,CHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1] Versus M/S DOLLAR CO.P.LTD. THROUGH M.D RAJESH KUMAR-I[R-1] 112 C.A. No. 6240-6241/2009 IX COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT),MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR Versus M/S KAINYA AND ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. THR. ITS. G.M. AND ANR. BALRAJ DEWAN Indirect Taxes Matters - Others 113 C.A.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Chambers of Hon'ble the Chief Justice
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 07-09-2021 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY (TIME : 1:30 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1001 Diary No. 18027-2021 VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA II-A Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR. IN SLP(Crl) No. - 3340/2021, IA No. 105228/2021 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION NEW DELHI 03-09-2021 16:43:02 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 07-09-2021 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY (TIME : 1:35 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1002 R.P.(Crl.) No. 353/2021 ADESH PANDEY in SLP(Crl) No. 4223/2021 II-A Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH IN SLP(Crl) No. - 4223/2021, NEW DELHI 03-09-2021 16:43:11 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 07-09-2021 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH (TIME : 1:30 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1001 R.P.(Crl.) No. 352/2021 KAMLESH PRABHUDAS TANNA in SLP(Crl) No.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Chambers of Hon'ble the Chief Justice
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-08-2021 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN (TIME : 1:30 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1001 Diary No. 2478-2019 DIPANKAR GHOSH II-B Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL IN SLP(Crl) No. - 725/2017, NEW DELHI 30-07-2021 11:22:06 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-08-2021 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN (TIME : 1:35 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1002 R.P.(Crl.) No. 191/2021 KHUSHRU in SLP(Crl) No. 67/2021 II Versus THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND IN SLP(Crl) No. - 67/2021, IA No. 41232/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 41231/2021 - ORAL HEARING IA No. 41235/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE SYNOPSIS AND LIST OF DATES NEW DELHI 30-07-2021 11:22:23 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 03-08-2021 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN (TIME : 1:35 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1001 Diary No. 34492-2019 STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI II Versus ARIF KHAN @ AGHA KHAN IN Crl.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fcm:Rr 11M Wfcp ~ Qflttl Ttl "[Rl ~ F.Itr F."Igjcffi Cp'tcrrfug ~ (Ftt Cp't\5Ffift
    -print I '--"~l Government of India Department of Justice DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 26 MAN SINGH ROAD, JAISALME NEW DELHI-llOOll Dated: 26/11/2020 To Shri Sh. Neeraj Shrivastav Niwasi: H. No. 606/513, Purana Katra, Prayagraj 211002 Registration Number: JUSTCIRlT/20/00710 Dear Sir/Madam I am to refer to your Request for Information under RTI Act 2005, received vide letter dated 24/1112020 and to say that ~ fcp ~"Q"~ ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ Cf)Ql 11m W fcp flcITiiI ;tj I~ I(1~ ~ ~~ cp't CI~ ~ d I ~ f.1tITxur ~ ~"CR, Jf'U:fffi ~ fcm:rr 11m Wfcp ~ ;tj I~ I(14'j ~ ~~ /~ ~~ em QfI~~ "[RllJiildt:! ;tj1~1(1~ ~ q~l"RI ~ ~ ~ m~fflq>I~~1 cp't \lJl(ft WI m~~,~ CI~~dl Qflttl ttl "[Rl ~ ;tj I~ 1(1~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f.itR f."IgJCffi cp't crrfug ~ JfTUR "CR(ftT cp't\5ffift ~ I ~~~~ 2~~cq~, flcITiiI ;tj1~1(1~ cp't CI~~dl ~cp't~md"~WI. In case, you want to go for an appeal in connection with the information provided, you may appeal to the Appellate Authority indicated below within thirty days from the date of receipt of this letter. , Ms. HEM LATA FAA & Under Secretary (Appointment)/FAA Address: Department of justice, jaisalmer house, New Delhi-llOOll Phone No.: 23382978 Yours faithfully ( ARUN KUMAR AGGARWAL) CPIO & SECTION OFFICER(APPOINTMENT)/CPIO Phone No.: 23383037 Email: [email protected] • .. ~'1iCf) : 12.11.2020 ~\1lr1~~ ~ ~ ~ +j~IC1<:{ , ~mOO, ~-fcM, ~ ~ ~ ~~-110001 ~:~ cnr ~ ~ ctr um 6 q 7 rf> ~ ~ ~ ~I. 1. \3i£!clli -;:x:rrmCf1<:l C# IiI'141 <:{ ~ $ ClRtidfll ~ ~ ~ ct>~ >If()ft1rq I 2.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Chambers of Hon'ble the Chief Justice
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 20-07-2021 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (TIME : 1:20 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1001 Diary No. 461-2021 THE PRINCIPAL GENERAL MANAGER (TELECOM) XII Versus INDIA COM LIMITED AND ANR. IN D No. - 4002/2020, IA No. 2604/2021 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION NEW DELHI 16-07-2021 16:02:55 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF CURATIVE & REVIEW PETITIONS (BY CIRCULATION) IN THE CHAMBERS OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 20-07-2021 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (TIME : 1:25 PM) SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent 1002 Diary No. 4375-2021 M/S. BHASKAR RAJU BROTHERS AND ANR. IV-A Versus M/S. DHARMARATNAKARA RAI BAHADUR ARCOT NARAINSWAMY MUDALIAR CHATTRAM OTHER CHARITIES AND ORS. IN C.A. No. - 1599/2020, IA No. 51837/2021 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING 1003 Diary No. 8805-2021 THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. XV Versus ABDUL RAHOOF IN SLP(C) No. - 30048/2019, IN SLP(C) No. - 30049/2019, IA No. 47218/2021 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION 1003 Connected THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. .1 Diary No. 8471-2021 XV Versus MANOHAR LAL TRIVEDI IN SLP(C) No. - 30050/2019, IA No.
    [Show full text]