The EU Budget Powering the Recovery Plan for Europe
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions In
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.06.20054197; this version posted April 10, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . The effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions in containing epidemics: a rapid review of the literature and quantitative assessment CHEATLEY Jane1, VUIK Sabine1, DEVAUX Marion1, SCARPETTA Stefano1, PEARSON Mark1, COLOMBO Francesca1, CECCHINI Michele1 1. Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France Corresponding author: CECCHINI Michele: [email protected] Abstract The number of confirmed COVID-19 cases has rapidly increased since discovery of the disease in December 2019. In the absence of medical countermeasures to stop the spread of the disease (i.e. vaccines), countries have responded by implementing a suite of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to contain and mitigate COVID-19. Individual NPIs range in intensity (e.g. from lockdown to public health campaigns on personal hygiene), as does their impact on reducing disease transmission. This study uses a rapid review approach and investigates evidence from previous epidemic outbreaks to provide a quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of key NPIs used by countries to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Results from the study are designed to help countries enhance their policy response as well as inform transition strategies by identifying which policies should be relaxed and which should not. Introduction In December 2019, Wuhan, located in the Hubei province of China, experienced an outbreak of pneumonia from a novel virus – severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (Chen et al., 2020[1]). -
Mapping of Cultural Heritage Actions in European Union Policies, Programmes and Activities
Mapping of Cultural Heritage actions in European Union policies, programmes and activities Last update: April 2017 This mapping exercise aims to contribute to the development of a strategic approach to the preservation and valorisation of European heritage. It responds to the "Conclusions on cultural heritage as a strategic resource for a sustainable Europe" adopted by the Council of the European Union on 20th May 2014, and complements the European Commission Communication "Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe", published on 22 July 2014. The document provides a wide (but not exhaustive) range of useful information about recent policy initiatives and support actions undertaken by the European Union in the field of cultural heritage. Table of Contents 1. CULTURE ...................................................................................................... 5 1.1 EU policy / legislation ................................................................................ 5 Council Work Plan for Culture 2015-2018 ........................................................... 5 Priority Area A: Accessible and inclusive culture .................................... 5 Priority Area B: Cultural heritage ......................................................... 5 Priority Area C: Cultural and creative sectors: Creative economy and innovation ........................................................................................ 6 Priority area D: Promotion of cultural diversity, culture in the EU external relations and -
VADEMECUM on Sources of Funding for the Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe 2019
VADEMECUM ON SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR THE CULTURAL ROUTES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE 2019 VADEMECUM ON SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR THE CULTURAL ROUTES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE 2019 Image credits: © Shutterstock Document prepared by the European Institute of Cultural Routes, September 2019. Please inform the Institute about any updates. Contact: [email protected] Vademecum on Sources of Funding for the Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe 2019 Foreword ...................................................................................................................................... I Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. III Nature and Structure of the Vademecum ..................................................................................... V EUROPEAN UNION ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction to EU Funding .................................................................................................... 1 ................................................................................................................... 7 Creative Europe ...................................................................................................................... 7 Europe for Citizens ................................................................................................................. 7 COSME ................................................................................................................................... -
EU Policy Brief on Food & Cultural Heritage
EU policy brief on food & cultural heritage 1 with the contribution EU policy brief on food & cultural heritage EXECUTIVE SUMMARY _________________________________________________________________________ Citizens across Europe are paying increasing attention to their food choices, partly out of concern for their health, but also for ethical or sustainability considerations. This trend has been strongly reinforced as a result of the COVID-19 crisis which disrupted food supply chains, but also reminded Europeans of the contribution of food to their physical and mental well-being. In parallel, culture remains a paramount underlying factor influencing citizens’ food choices, and an important link to traditions and cultural representations. However, in an era where global supply chains are standardising the food most easily accessible to consumers, the link between citizens and their food heritage deserves to be better protected. Food heritage can and must play a key role in the shift towards sustainable food production and consumption that is needed to address today’s key societal challenges, such as Europe’s post-pandemic recovery and the fight against climate change, in line with the Commission’s Green Deal commitments. At the same time, food culture must be part of the discussion on the wide- ranging immediate impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and the measures implemented to contain it, which are taking a considerable toll on the agriculture and heritage worlds. The links between food and culture are too often overlooked in policy-making although the production and consumption of food are strongly influenced by our cultural environment. In EU policy terms, this translates into a lack of coherence between food, agricultural and cultural policies. -
COVID-19 Vaccination Programme: Information for Healthcare Practitioners
COVID-19 vaccination programme Information for healthcare practitioners Republished 6 August 2021 Version 3.10 1 COVID-19 vaccination programme: Information for healthcare practitioners Document information This document was originally published provisionally, ahead of authorisation of any COVID-19 vaccine in the UK, to provide information to those involved in the COVID-19 national vaccination programme before it began in December 2020. Following authorisation for temporary supply by the UK Department of Health and Social Care and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency being given to the COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer BioNTech on 2 December 2020, the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca on 30 December 2020 and the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna on 8 January 2021, this document has been updated to provide specific information about the storage and preparation of these vaccines. Information about any other COVID-19 vaccines which are given regulatory approval will be added when this occurs. The information in this document was correct at time of publication. As COVID-19 is an evolving disease, much is still being learned about both the disease and the vaccines which have been developed to prevent it. For this reason, some information may change. Updates will be made to this document as new information becomes available. Please use the online version to ensure you are accessing the latest version. 2 COVID-19 vaccination programme: Information for healthcare practitioners Document revision information Version Details Date number 1.0 Document created 27 November 2020 2.0 Vaccine specific information about the COVID-19 mRNA 4 Vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer BioNTech) added December 2020 2.1 1. -
The Impact of Creative Europe in the UK June 2018 EUROPEA Report by Drew Wylie with the Support of Creative Europe Desk UK in the UK
THE IMPACT OF CREATIVEThe impact of Creative Europe in the UK June 2018 EUROPEA report by Drew Wylie with the support of Creative Europe Desk UK IN THE UK A report by Drew Wylie Projects July 2018 with the support of Creative Europe Desk UK Creative Europe Desk UK is led by In partnership with Arts Council England, Creative Scotland and Welsh Government. With support from the UK Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and the European Commission. The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Contents 1. Introduction 04 Key Findings 05 Background 06 1.1. The cultural and creative sector in the UK 06 1.2. The Creative Europe programme 07 2. Methodology and Approach 08 2.1. Phase one 08 2.2. Phase two 08 3. Impacts Framework 09 4. Creative Europe in Numbers 10 4.1. MEDIA sub-programme 10 4.2. Culture sub-programme 11 4.3. Cross-sector strand 11 5. Creative Europe: Emerging Impacts in the UK 12 5.1. Economic impact 12 5.1.1. Increase in output and employment 12 5.1.2. Increase in investment 13 5.2. Internationalisation and networks 18 5.2.1. Partnerships 18 5.2.2. Increasing market potential 19 5.2.3. Enabling cultural relations 20 5.3. Innovation, research and development 24 5.3.1. Creation of new content and IP 24 5.3.2. -
Work Programme 2020 and the Work Programme 2021
2020 annual work programme for the implementation of the Creative Europe Programme C(2019) 6151 of 23 August 2019 EN SUMMARY Commission Implementing Decision on the adoption of the 2020 annual work programme for the implementation of the Creative Europe Programme The attached Commission Implementing Decision presents the 2020 annual work programmes on grants and contracts for budget lines 15.0401, 15.04.02 and 09.05.01 under the Creative Europe Programme. It serves as a Financing Decision and allows the Authorizing Officer to publish the Calls presented in the annex and to take the individual award decisions. The Creative Europe Programme consists of two Sub-programmes - the MEDIA Sub-programme supporting the audiovisual sector and the Culture Sub-programme supporting the cultural and creative stakeholders other than audiovisual - and a Cross-sectoral strand supporting the Cultural and Creative Sectors Guarantee Facility, cross-sectoral activities, transnational cooperation and the Creative Europe Desks. The appropriations available will be used as follows: - For grants (implemented under direct management): a) MEDIA Sub-programme 2.01 Support to Training 2.02 Support to the Development of Audiovisual Content: Single Projects and Slate Funding 2.03 Support to the Development of European Video Games 2.04 Support to Television Programming of Audiovisual European Works 2.05 Support to Co-production funds 2.06 Support to Market access 2.07 Support for the Distribution of non-national films - The Cinema Automatic Scheme 2.08 Support for the -
Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions and Mortality in U.S. Cities During the Great Influenza Pandemic, 1918-1919*
Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions and Mortality in U.S. Cities during the Great Influenza Pandemic, 1918-1919* Robert J. Barro Harvard University August 2020 Abstract A key issue for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is whether non-pharmaceutical public-health interventions (NPIs) retard death rates. Good information about these effects comes from flu- related excess deaths in large U.S. cities during the second wave of the Great Influenza Pandemic, September 1918-February 1919. NPIs, as measured by an extension of Markel, et al. (2007), are in three categories: school closings, prohibitions on public gatherings, and quarantine/isolation. Although an increase in NPIs flattened the curve in the sense of reducing the ratio of peak to average death rates, the estimated effect on overall deaths is small and statistically insignificant. One possibility is that the NPIs were not more successful in curtailing overall mortality because the average duration of each type of NPI was only around one month. Another possibility is that NPIs mainly delay deaths rather than eliminating them. *I have benefited from comments by Martin Cetron, Sergio Correia, Ed Glaeser, Claudia Goldin, Chris Meissner, and Jim Stock, and from research assistance by Emily Malpass. 1 The mortality experienced during the Great Influenza Pandemic of 1918-1920 likely provides the best historical information on the plausible upper found for outcomes under the ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Barro, Ursúa, and Weng (2020) compiled and discussed the cross-country data on flu-related deaths during the Great Influenza Pandemic. Based on information for 48 countries, that study found that the Pandemic killed around 40 million people, 2.1 percent of the world’s population. -
Creative Europe Programme 2021-2027
BRIEFING EU Legislation in Progress 2021-2027 MFF Creative Europe programme 2021-2027 OVERVIEW Having considered the possibility of merging the Creative Europe programme with other programmes supporting European values, rights and justice, the European Commission has decided to continue the Creative Europe programme as a stand-alone programme, increasing its budget by 17 %. The only programme focusing exclusively on cultural and creative activities and enterprises, it falls under the 'Cohesion and values' heading of the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework. The previous programme focused on the economic dimension of the cultural sector and its contribution to job creation and economic growth. Some stakeholders had voiced concern at taking such a strongly economic approach to culture. Under the new programme, the economic dimension is one axis alongside the social dimension, as well as culture's contribution to international relations. The new framework for cultural policy therefore highlights not only the economic dimension of the cultural and creative sectors, but also the role of culture in social cohesion and its relation to creative and artistic freedom and diversity, and freedom and plurality of media. The Parliament, Council and Commission started trilogue negotiations in autumn 2019. After an almost year-long break, the negotiations resumed in the second half of 2020 when the Council, the Commission and the EP reached a common agreement. The new programme was then finally adopted in May 2021, but applies with retroactive effect -
National Deployment & Vaccination Plan
NATIONAL DEPLOYMENT & VACCINATION EPI PLAN (NDVP)FOR COVID-19 VACCINES 24th June 2021 (2021) Expanded Program on Immunization | Ministry of National Health Services Regulations & Coordination Islamabad 1 Table of Contents Introduction Country Profile Planning and Coordination Regulatory Preparedness Identification of Target Population Costing and Funding Vaccine Delivery Strategy Supply Chain Management Microplanning Human Resource Management and Training Recording and Reporting Healthcare Waste Management RCCE, Vaccine Acceptance and Uptake Monitoring Surveillance and AEFI Evaluation 2 List of Acronyms Acronym Full name ADB Asian Development Bank AEFI Adverse Event Following Immunization AJK Azad Jammu and Kashmir BAL Balochistan BHU Basic Health Unit CBV Community Based Volunteer CDA Capital Development Authority CEPI Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations CHWs Community Health Workers CMW Community Midwife COVID Coronavirus Disease CSOs Civil Society Organizations CVC COVID-19 Vaccination Counter CVT COVID-19 Vaccination Team CVIC COVID-19 Vaccine Introduction Costing Tool DHO District Health Officer DHQ District Headquarter DQA Data Quality Assessment DRAP Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan EMRO Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office EOC Emergency Operation Center EPI Expanded Program on Immunization FATA Federally Administered Tribal Areas FIC Fully Immunized Child GAVI The Vaccine Alliance GACVS Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety GB Gilgit-Baltistan GF Gates Foundation HCP Health Care Provider ICC Inter-Agency -
Creative Europe Programme Lead DG: EAC Associated Dgs: CNECT I
Programme Statements DB2021 HEADING 3: Security and citizenship Creative Europe Programme Lead DG: EAC Associated DGs: CNECT I. Overview What the programme is about? With a budget of EUR 1.46 billion, Creative Europe is the European Commission’s framework programme for support to the Europe’s culture and audiovisual sectors. The programme is divided into two sub-programmes, Culture and MEDIA, and is supported by a cross-sectoral strand. Its objectives are to promote cultural and linguistic diversity and enhance the competitiveness of these sectors, by supporting small independent production and distribution companies in the audiovisual field as well as a wide range of operators in the cultural field. The Creative Europe programme contributes to the political priorities of the Commission, in particular relating to jobs, growth and investment and the European Digital Single Market. By allowing participation of non-EU cultural and creative operators, the programme also contributes to making the EU a stronger global actor. At the same time, the programme helps address current political and societal challenges through the power of culture to reach the hearts and minds of citizens and boost confidence in our shared European values. The MEDIA sub-programme provides added value through supporting independent producers and distributors and their audiovisual works (mainly films and TV programmes including live action, animation, fiction and documentaries as well as some video games) in order to ensure that they operate and circulate across Europe and globally, through financial support to the development and creation of audiovisual works, their cross-border distribution, including online, financing of promotional activities and building the skills and talents in the sector. -
EU Policy Brief on Food & Cultural Heritage
EU policy brief on food & cultural heritage with the contribution FOOD IS CULTURE: EU policy brief on food & cultural heritage Europa Nostra & Slow Food _______________________________________________________________________________________ “There is still much to be done to bring the world of food closer to the world of culture. There must be a growing awareness that they are two worlds that are interchangeable and not incompatible. To save our endangered planet we must start again from the earth, and in particular from food. We are eating our planet. We have an important and urgent job to do.” Piero Sardo, President of the Slow Food Foundation for Biodiversity Contact: Manon Richard (Europa Nostra) [email protected] Madeleine Coste (Slow Food) [email protected] 2 FOOD IS CULTURE Table of Contents 5 What is food heritage? 6 Relevance of food heritage 6 Food heritage - key for preserving biodiversity and fighting climate change 7 Food heritage - key for sustainable local development 8 Food heritage - key for sustainable cultural tourism 9 Food heritage - key for social cohesion and inclusion 10 Food heritage: current EU policy framework 10 Key elements of the EU policy framework for cultural heritage 10 Key elements of the EU policy framework for food and agriculture 12 Food heritage in the EU’s financial recovery instruments 12 Recommendations for a better safeguard of food heritage at EU level 12 Recommendation 1: Fully recognise the value of food heritage as a transversal sector 13 Recommendation 2: Set up a participatory and multi-stakeholder governance for food heritage 14 About the project 14 Acknowledgement 14 About Slow Food 14 About Europa Nostra 15 References 3 Introduction Citizens across Europe are paying increasing attention to their food choices, partly out of concern for their health, but also for ethical or sustainability considerations.