In the 17Th Century, the Holy Family Was Often Portrayed As a Simple Family, One of Humble, Country Folk
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
In the 17th century, the Holy Family was often portrayed as a simple family, one of humble, country folk. The Counter-Reformation highlighted the Bible stories, showing that the characters involved were real people. For example, the ministries were painted using different models, almost constituting portraits. The aim was to reinforce the faith. This uncatalogued Holy Family1 that is the subject of our study manifests great solemnity at the same time as close intimacy, with elegance in the figures of the Virgin and Child and extraordinary simplicity in the portrayal of both Saint Joseph and St. Francis of Assisi, with the latter featuring only rarely in paintings of the Holy Family. In our Holy Family, the centre of the painting is occupied by the Virgin, wearing clothes in her traditional colours, a red robe with a blue cloak, a violet shawl, and a white blouse. The Virgin is smiling almost devotedly at her son, who is standing and embracing his mother’s left hand, as she supports him on her knees. To the right of the scene, St. Joseph is positioned slightly further back, being portrayed with a beard, while St. Francis of Assisi stands to the left, closer to the Child. His hand reveals the wounds of the stigmata. The dark background reveals a series of columns on their pedestals. The characters are standing in front of a building2. The vividly coloured clothing imbues our painting with considerable dynamism and an attractive brilliance and brightness. On the lower right-hand side of the painting in question here, there is a monogram consisting of greyish letters, crested by a princely crown. Our painting was restored some fifteen years ago3. Considering both its composition and the figures portrayed, together with its treatment of colour and its vigorous and brilliant technique, the painting under study here can clearly be attributed to Peter Paul Rubens and his workshop. 1 Oil, canvas, 126*97 cm. The painting has a 17th century frame (French or Flemish). Its provenance is Central Europe, and it was bought around 1900. 2 An ultraviolet study of the painting has revealed that the background is not so uniform, showing more space. 3 In my study of the painting, I have consulted Mr A. Fáy, whom I should like to thank for his assistance. During the restoration process the painting has lost some of the plasticity in its brushstrokes due to the use of a conservation adhesive, and the method of pressing used has meant that in some areas the surface paint as it was originally applied has been flattened somewhat, especially in the area of the body. The painting has been restored, and its colours are bright. There is some retouching on the left-hand side, on the Virgin’s blue cloak, her left elbow and her neck. As regards St. Joseph and St. Francis, the former’s head and the latter’s beard and neck areas are fairly intact, although there is some retouching everywhere else. The Child’s head has no retouching. There are pentimenti on the Child’s right foot and on the Virgin’s hand. The composition of our Holy Family is inspired by the Holy Family with Saint Anne by Rubens that hangs in the Prado Museum4. Our painting is a variation of the same theme. In this Holy Family, St. Francis of Assisi appears on the left-hand side instead of St. Anne. In terms of the composition itself, the Holy Family in the Prado Museum is more dynamic. The Holy Family in the Prado also gives the figures more space, the Virgin is showing her breast and the Child is naked. Our painting is also different in terms of the clothing; the Virgin’s breast is covered by her blouse, and the Child’s lower back is covered by a cloth5. As regards the positioning of the Virgin and Child, Rubens had already painted this same model on a panel6. Rubens’ paintings of the Holy Family can be dated to around 1630, and the figure of the Virgin in them is inspired by the master’s second wife, Helene Fourment, who he married precisely in 1630. She appears in certain Holy Families by Rubens that also feature St. Francis of Assisi, but the composition is different to the painting under study here: in one of them, St. Francis is portrayed on his knees, as in the Holy Family in Windsor, which Jaffé dates to 1626-287. Among the youthful works by Rubens there are some that show St. Francis’ stigmata, such as the one located on the left wing of the altar of Saint Gummarus, in Liege8. The drawing on our painting is fairly similar. There is also some similarity between our St. Francis and the depiction of the Saint’s head painted by Rubens9. Although it is not the same model, there are several likenesses between the two in terms of the high, raised forehead and the depiction of the nose. Ghent Museum has a St. Francis receiving the stigmata painted by Rubens and dated in 1633, which is likewise fairly similar to the painting we are studying here as regards the wrinkles on the Saint’s forehead and his strong hands. The model used in our painting for portraying St. Francis with a beard and high forehead is different to all the other models of St. Francis within the known work by Rubens, which suggests, and not unfoundedly so, that the model may have been the painting’s donor. 4 Prado Museum, Madrid, Inv no. 1639, o.1.115*90 cm. 5 Our painting and the one in the Prado have different canvases. The canvas on our painting is thinner, while the one in the Prado Museum is stronger and more structured. 6 The painting is reproduced in Rosenberg, A.: P.P. Rubens, des Meisters Gemälde, Stuttgart-Leipzig 1905, 167, oil on canvas, 96.5*72.5 cm. The painting’s whereabouts is not now known. 7 Jaffé, M.: Rubens. Catalogo completo, Milan 1989, no 881, variants of painting no. 1047, The Metropolitan Museum, New York, dating it to 1630-35, and no. 1048, of the Museum of Art, San Diego, California, 1630-32 8 Jaffé, op. cit. 1989, dates the triptych to around 1618-19. 9 Held, J.S.: Rubens, Selected Drawings, London 1959, II. No. 122, Frankfurt, Städelsches Kunstinstitut. The naturalism of the Saint’s face tells us that the model must have been closely related to the master, and may have been a Franciscan monk who was friendly with the painter. This aspect of the painting reveals a clear Italian influence, as a reminder of the years Rubens spent in Italy between 1600 and 1608. Rubens often painted the figure of St. Joseph, and we can see that the position of the Saint’s hand in the painting is the same as in the Holy Family with a parrot in the Koninklijk Museum10. The painting in question here is not mentioned in either the older monographs11 or in the more recent ones12, and not even in the Corpus Rubaniarum Ludwig Borchard, but it may be linked to a painting by Rubens that was auctioned in Vienna in 182013 from the Antón Wenzel von Kaunitz Collection. Wenzel Antón, Prince of Kaunitz-Rietberg, was an Austrian diplomat who was born on 2nd February 1711 in Vienna, where he also died on 27th June 1794. From 1741 onwards he was a diplomat in Rome, Florence and Turin. In 1744, Charles VI appointed him a minster in the Low Countries. After a highly successful career as a diplomat, he returned to Vienna in 1753, where he became Chancellor of State. In 1756, he returned to the Low Countries as foreign minister, an office that also included Lombardy. Following the Seven Years’ War, in 1764 he was granted the title of Reichsfürst (Prince of the Holy Roman Empire). During the reign of Maria Theresa he was an all-powerful statesman. A great collector, he admired science and art, while at the same time becoming the patron and founder of the Academy of Fine Arts in Vienna in 1768, as well as of other art institutes. Following his death, the famous Wenzel Antón von Kaunitz collection remained in his family until 1820, when they held the first auction of his works in Vienna. Frimmel’s 1899 work Geschichte der Wiener Gemäldesammlungen involved a comprehensive study of the Kaunitz collection14, in which the author already mentions works by Rubens in the Kaunitz collection (e.g., “Boreas Abducting Oreithyia”, today in the Gallery of the Akademie der Bildenden Künste in Vienna). In 1745 the painting belonged to the collection held by Verspecht, who was Ratsadvocat in Brussels, and at that time Spruyt made an engraving of it. This might well have been when Kaunitz bought the painting, as collecting had been one’s of his characteristic traits since his youth, possibly inherited from his grandfather Count Dominik Andreas Kaunitz (1655-1705), a consummate art expert and collector, who was sent on a diplomatic mission to the Netherlands, 10 Antwerp, Jaffé, M. op. cit. 1989, no. 913 dated to 1620-1628. 11 Smith, J.: Catalogue Raisonné of the Works of the most eminent Dutch and Flemish Painters, II Life and Works Peter Paul Rubens, London 1830, Rooses, M.: Geschichte der Malerschule Antwerpens: P.P. Rubens, 1881, Rosenberg, A.: P.P. Rubens. Des Meister Gemälde. Klassiker der Kunst, Stuttgart 1905. 12 Jaffé, op. cit. 1989. 13 Wurzbach, C. von: Biographisches Lexikon des Kaiserthums Oesterreich. Vienna 1864, XI. 70-86. 14 Frimmel, Th.von: Geschichte der Wiener Gemäldesammlungen. Erster Band.