<<

[CANCER RESEARCH 64, 429–434, January 1, 2004] The Is an Antagonist of the Aryl Hydrocarbon That Inhibits Signal Transduction Induced by 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

Christopher J. MacDonald, Henry P. Ciolino, and Grace Chao Yeh Cellular Defense and Carcinogenesis Section, Basic Research Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, NIH, Frederick, Maryland

ABSTRACT (a)pyrene, and heterocyclic amines such as 2-amino-1-methyl-6- phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine. These classes of xenobiotics are all 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is a widespread environ- suspected human carcinogens. For example, TCDD, a widespread mental contaminant, that has been linked with a variety of deleterious environmental contaminant generated by a variety of industrial pro- effects on human health, including increased cancer rates and reproduc- tive anomalies. The detrimental effects of TCDD are mediated via the aryl cesses, has been linked to an increase in many types of human hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a transcription factor that regulates the cancers, including hepatocellular cancer (3, 4). In animal models, expression of the carcinogen-activating cytochromes P-450 TCDD has been shown to cause acute toxicity (5), increased oxidative (CYP) 1A1, 1A2, and 1B1. In the present study, we examined the ability stress (6), impaired ovulation (7), and immunotoxicity (8). These of synthetic derivatives of to affect TCDD-stimulated AhR- effects in animal models are believed to closely reflect the deleterious mediated signal transduction in human hepatoma HepG2 cells. Salicyl- effects of TCDD in humans (9). TCDD has the highest affinity for the amide (SAL), an drug, caused a potent and long-lasting inhibi- AhR of any known compound, and is considered the prototypical AhR tion of TCDD-induced CYP activity. Acetylsalicylic acid () . Its interaction with the AhR is essential to its toxicity, as and the naturally occurring salicylic acid had no effect on demonstrated in AhR-knockout mice, which are impervious to TCDD CYP activity. SAL inhibited the increase in CYP1A1, -1A2, and -1B1 exposure (10). mRNA levels that occurs on exposure to TCDD. TCDD-induced transcrip- tion of these genes was also inhibited by SAL, but not by aspirin or Because of the central role of the AhR in the toxicity of TCDD and salicylic acid, as demonstrated by luciferase reporter assays. The tran- genotoxicity of numerous xenobiotics, the development of inhibitors scription of the CYP1 family of genes is regulated by the interaction of of AhR-mediated signal transduction has been an important goal of TCDD-activated AhR with the xenobiotic-responsive element present in chemoprevention science. In the present study, we have examined the the promoter regions of these genes. As shown by electrophoretic mobility effects of the salicylates on the AhR and the metabolic pathway it shift assay, SAL completely blocked the binding of TCDD-activated AhR regulates. Salicylic acid was first identified in bark extracts as to the xenobiotic responsive element. Also, SAL substantially blocked the an active anti-inflammatory compound more than 200 years ago, and binding of TCDD to the cytosolic AhR. These results demonstrate that its synthetic derivative, acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), has be used to SAL, a commonly used analgesic, is a potent inhibitor of AhR-mediated treat a number of human maladies for over a century. Recent studies signal transduction, and may be an effective agent in the prevention of have demonstrated that salicylate usage is associated with a reduction TCDD-associated disease. of incidence of several types of cancer (11–13), and animal studies have shown that salicylates are potent inhibitors of chemically in- INTRODUCTION duced carcinogenesis (14, 15). We have, therefore, examined the effects of salicylates on the AhR function in HepG2 cells, a well- The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ubiquitously expressed differentiated human liver cancer cell line that has been extensively cytosolic protein that is a member of the basic helix–loop–helix used as a model system to study the AhR (16–19). We demonstrated Per-Arnt-Sim super family of transcriptional regulatory proteins (1, that the synthetic salicylate, salicylamide (SAL), is a potent and 2). On binding the ligand, the “activated” AhR translocates to the long-lasting inhibitor of TCDD-induced signal transduction mediated nucleus, in which it forms a heterodimer with its partner, the aryl by the AhR. hydrocarbon nuclear translocator. Together, they form a transcription factor that binds to the xenobiotic-responsive element (XRE) present in the promoter region of a number of genes. The best characterized MATERIALS AND METHODS molecular response to AhR activation is the transcriptional induction Materials. Human hepatoma HepG2 cells were from American Type Cul- of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1, the genes that encode the 1A1, ture Collection (Manassas, VA). RPMI 1640, TRIzol, and LipofectAMINE 1A2, and 1B1 enzyme isoforms, respectively, of cytochrome P-450 were from Life Technologies, Inc. (Grand Island, NY). Glutamine and fetal (CYP). These enzymes catalyze the epoxidation of certain classes of bovine serum were from BioFluids (Rockville, MD). Polydeoxyinosinic-de- xenobiotics, resulting in the generation of highly reactive electrophilic oxycytidylic acid, protease inhibitors, ethoxyresorufin, acetylsalicylic acid metabolites. These metabolites can covalently bind specific residues (aspirin), salicylic acid and SAL were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). [32P]dATP 32 of DNA, causing DNA adduct formation that may result in mutation and [ P]dCTP were from DuPont-NEN (Boston, MA). TCDD was from the 3 and subsequent cellular transformation. The AhR and the genes that it Midwest Research Institute (Kansas City, MO). [ H]TCDD was from Chem- syn Science Labs, Lanexa, KS. The Omniscript kit was from Qiagen (Valencia, regulates are, therefore, central in mediating the genotoxicity of many CA). Tris-borate gels, Tris-borate running buffer, and high-density sample environmental contaminants. buffer were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Ligands of the AhR include several classes of environmental car- Cell Culture. HepG2 human hepatoma cells were grown with RPMI 1640 cinogens, including polyhalogenated biphenyls such as 2,3,7,8-tetra- supplemented with 2 mM glutamine and 10% fetal bovine serum in a 5% CO2 chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), aryl hydrocarbons such as benzo- humidified incubator at 37°C. For all of the treatment compounds, DMSO was used as the vehicle and did not exceed 0.1%. Received 4/10/03; revised 9/23/03; accepted 9/29/03. Carcinogen Activation Capacity in HepG2 Cells. The ability of SAL to The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page affect CYP enzyme activity was evaluated in intact cells by measurement of charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity. In 24-well plates, HepG2 cells 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. were incubated with increasing concentrations of salicylates in the presence of Requests for reprints: Grace Chao Yeh, Basic Research Laboratory, Building 538/ Room 141, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702-1201. Phone: 1nM TCDD for 24 h, for dose-response experiments. For time course exper- (301) 846-5369; Fax: (301) 846-6395; Email: [email protected]. iments, cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of SAL, or with 429

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2004 American Association for Cancer Research. SAL INHIBITS AhR FUNCTION AND CYP1 EXPRESSION

Ligand-Binding Assay. AhR ligand binding was measured according to the methods of Raha et al. (26). Cytosolic protein (1.5 mg/500 ␮l) was incubated with 20 nM [3H]TCDD in the presence of DMSO (5 ␮l/500 ␮l), 5 mM SAL, or 10 ␮M TCDD (unlabeled) for2hat4°C. Samples were centri- fuged in linear gradients of 5–30% sucrose (v/v) in 12 ml of Beckman Quick-Seal rotor tubes at 65,000 rpm for2hat4°C in a Beckman VTI-65–1 rotor. Fractions (ϳ500 ␮l each) of the gradients were collected, and radioac- tivity was determined by scintillation counting. Statistical Analysis. Statistical analyses were performed with STATVIEW Statistical Analysis Software (SAS Institute, San Francisco, CA). Differences between group mean values were determined by a one-factor ANOVA, fol- lowed by Fisher’s protected least significant difference post hoc analysis for pairwise comparison of means. A two-sided P value of Ͻ0.05 was considered significant. CYP mRNA levels in Figs. 3 and 4 are shown on a linear scale.

Fig. 1. Structures of salicylic acid, aspirin, and salicylamide (SAL). RESULTS

other test compounds at concentrations that inhibit 50% (IC50), in the presence Effect of Salicylates on TCDD-Induced CYP Enzyme Activity. of1nM TCDD for various times from 6 to 144 h. Medium was decanted, and In this study, we examined three salicylates the structures of which cells were washed once with PBS. Medium containing 5 ␮M ethoxyresorufin are illustrated in Fig. 1. The cellular capacity for enzymatic acti- was added. Increasing fluorescence as a result of the conversion of vation of procarcinogens was measured by EROD assay. Treatment ethoxyresorufin to resorufin by CYP enzymes was measured using a CytoFluor of HepG2 cells with 1 nM TCDD resulted in an increase in multiwell plate reader (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), with an exci- EROD-specific activity from nondetectable levels to 17 pmol/min/ tation of 530 nm and emission at 590 nm. The reaction was allowed to run for 30 min. well in controls (Fig. 2A). The addition of SAL caused a concen- Reverse Transcription-PCR. In 6-well plates, cells were treated with various concentrations of SAL alone, or with 100 pM TCDD, for 8 h. Cells were washed twice with PBS, and total RNA was isolated with TRIzol reagent per manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized from 2 ␮g of total RNA using an Omniscript kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR for cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1), cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2), and cytochrome P4501B1 (CYP1B1) expression was performed as described previously (20). Primer sequences and conditions for CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 were as described by Dohr et al. (21), and for cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2) as described by Chung and Bresnick (22). Primers for glyceraldehyde-3- phosphate dehydrogenase were from Clontech (Palo Alto, CA). The opti- mum cycle number that fell within the exponential range of response for CYP1A1 (23 cycles), CYP1A2 (28 cycles), CYP1B1 (30 cycles) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (17 cycles) was used. The level of CYP mRNA was normalized to the level of glyceraldehyde-3- phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA. Luciferase Assay. HepG2 cells were seeded onto 6-well plates at 400,000 cells/well. After 24 h, the cells were transiently transfected with a luciferase reporter vector (1.5 ␮g/well) containing three repeats of the XRE and a ␤-galactosidase vector (pCMV-␤-gal; 0.6 ␮g/well) with the use of Lipo- fectAMINE. Transfected cells were treated with various concentrations of salicylates in the presence of 10 nM TCDD. Luciferase activity was measured using a Microlumat LB 96P luminometer (EG&G Berthold). ␤-galactosidase activity was determined by the method of Rosenthal (23). Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay. HepG2 cells were incubated with DMSO (0.1%), 10 nM TCDD alone, or 10 nM TCDD with 1 mM SAL for 2 h at 37°C. Nuclear protein was isolated, and electrophoretic mobility shift assay was performed by the method of Denison et al. (24). Synthetic oligonucleo- tides containing the AhR-binding site of the XRE (forward primer, 5Ј-GAT CTG AGC TCG GAG TTG CGT GAG AAG AGC CG-3Ј; reverse primer, 5Ј-CGG CTC TTC TCA CGC AAC TCC GAG CTC AG-3Ј; Ref. 25) were labeled with [32P]dCTP. Binding reactions were performed for 25 min (10-min preincubation without probe ϩ 15-min incubation with probe) at room tem- perature and contained 10 ␮g of nuclear protein, 2 ␮g of polydeoxyinossinic deoxycytidylic acid and labeled probe (ϳ50,000 cpm) in a final volume of 20 ␮ l of binding buffer [25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 5% (v/v) glycerol]. To determine the specificity of binding to the oligonucleotide, excess unlabeled specific probe was incubated with the nuclear extract of TCDD-treated cells for 15 min. DNA–protein complexes were separated under nondenaturing conditions on a 6% (w/v) Fig. 2. Effect of salicylates on 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)-induced polyacrylamide gel with 0.5ϫ Tris/borate/EDTA running buffer. The gels cytochrome P-450 (CYP) activity in HepG2 cells. CYP activity was determined in intact cells by ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) assay. A, cells were treated with 1 nM were dried, and the amount of labeled probe present in the DNA–protein TCDD and the indicated concentrations of salicylate for 24 h. B, cells were treated with complexes was determined with a Bio-Rad GS-363 molecular imaging system. TCDD and salicylamide (SAL) for the times indicated. n ϭ 4 Ϯ SE. 430

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2004 American Association for Cancer Research. SAL INHIBITS AhR FUNCTION AND CYP1 EXPRESSION

Table 1 The effect of salicylamide on cytochrome (CYP)-activity, after induction was no significant effect on microsomal EROD activity (P ϭ 0.70; HepG2 cells were incubated with 1 nM 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) Table 1), whereas ␣-naphthoflavone completely abolished EROD for 24 h. Cells were washed, and competitors (10 ␮M ␣-naphthoflavone or 250 ␮M salicylamide) were added. Ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity was measured activity. in intact cells 2 h later. Microsomes from TCDD-treated cells were incubated with DMSO Effect of SAL on CYP1A1, -1A2, and -1B1 mRNA Levels. (control) or competitors, and EROD activity was measured. Experiments were performed in quadruplicate two times. TCDD caused a 13.3-, 7.5-, and 2.8-fold increase in CYP1A1, -1A2, and -1B1 expression in HepG2 cells, respectively, compared with Treatment Activitya DMSO controls. SAL cotreatment inhibited the TCDD-induced in- Intact cells Control 20.16 Ϯ 0.49 crease of all three CYP isozymes in a concentration-dependent man- ␣-Naphthoflavone 2.05 Ϯ 0.08 ner (Fig. 3A). SAL treatment alone had no effect on basal CYP Salicylamide 19.15 Ϯ 0.22 Microsomes expression (Fig. 3B). Aspirin did not have an effect on TCDD-induced Control 2.22 Ϯ 0.06 CYP mRNA (data not shown). ␣-Naphthoflavone Not detected Salicylamide 2.18 Ϯ 0.06 Effect of Salicylates on XRE-Controlled Luciferase Reporter a Activity for intact cells is in units of pmol/min/100 k cells; activity for microsomes Activity. HepG2 cells were transiently transfected with a lucifer- is in units of pmol/min/2.5 ␮g. ase reporter vector containing multiple copies of the XRE. TCDD induced luciferase activity by ϳ45-fold above control levels. The addition of SAL resulted in a concentration-dependent decrease of tration-dependent inhibition of EROD activity, with an interpo- luciferase activity (Fig. 4). Aspirin and salicylic acid had no effect ϳ ␮ lated IC50 of 170 M. SAL at 1 mM suppressed EROD levels to (Fig. 4). 10% of cells treated with TCDD alone. In contrast, both aspirin and Effect of SAL on AhR Activation. The effect of SAL on TCDD- salicylic acid had no inhibitory effect at any concentration (Fig. induced activation of the AhR was measured by electrophoretic 2A). TCDD caused a persistent increase in EROD activity in mobility shift assay. TCDD (10 nM) caused a significant increase HepG2 cells that remained at maximal levels for 6 days (Fig. 2B). in AhR translocation to the nucleus and in binding to the XRE. SAL, added along with TCDD, caused an inhibition of enzyme This was completely suppressed in cells cotreated with 1 mM SAL activity that persisted throughout the 6-day time course, regardless of the concentration used (Fig. 2B). (Fig. 5). The specificity of the bandshift was confirmed by treat- The inhibitory effect of SAL was further examined to test whether ment of nuclear extracts with excess unlabeled XRE and by incu- this was due to a direct effect on CYP enzyme activity. The addition bation with an antibody to the AhR, which abolished AhR-XRE of SAL (250 ␮M) to HepG2 cells that were first incubated with TCDD binding (data not shown), as we have demonstrated previously (to induce CYP activity) did not have a significant effect on EROD (27). activity (P ϭ 0.16), whereas 10 ␮M ␣-naphthoflavone (a positive Effect of SAL on AhR Ligand Binding. Competitive binding control) inhibited EROD activity by 84%, compared with controls assays were performed using the cytosolic fraction from HepG2 cells. 3 (Table 1). SAL (250 ␮M) was also added to microsomes isolated from Binding of [ H]-TCDD to the AhR was competitively inhibited by TCDD-treated HepG2 cells, and EROD activity was assayed. There excess unlabeled TCDD or SAL (Fig. 6).

Fig. 3. Effect of salicylamide (SAL) on cytochrome P-450 (CYP) mRNA levels. Cells were treated with 100 pM 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and the indicated concentration of SAL (A) or with SAL alone (B) for 8 h. Levels of cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1), cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2), and cytochrome P4501B1 (CYP1B1) mRNA were measured by reverse transcription-PCR and normalized to that of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH). n ϭ 3 Ϯ SE. 431

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2004 American Association for Cancer Research. SAL INHIBITS AhR FUNCTION AND CYP1 EXPRESSION

DISCUSSION TCDD is a major environmental contaminant, generated by a va- riety of industrial processes. There are numerous thermal sources of TCDD, such as municipal, hazardous and medical waste incinerators, diesel engine emissions, fires, and residential heating. The manufac- ture of chlorinated chemicals, wood pulp, and paper also release TCDD (28). Major industrial accidents, including those in Nitro, West Virginia (1949) and Seveso, (1976), resulted in the release of huge amounts of TCDD, causing acute exposure to both workers and residents in the surrounding areas. Because of the chemical stability of TCDD and other related dioxins, there is persistent contamination worldwide. The primary source of human exposure to TCDD is food, particularly dairy products, meat, and fish (29). TCDD is detectable in human serum and is known to accumulate in adipose tissue of humans

Fig. 6. Competition with [3H]2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) for binding the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Cytosolic fractions of HepG2 cells were incubated 3 with 20 nM [ H]-TCDD in the presence of DMSO (f),1(‚),2(Ⅺ), or 5 mM salicylamide (SAL; F), or 10 ␮M unlabeled TCDD (᭜)for2hat4°C. The specific binding was measured by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Results are representative of two separate experiments.

and animals (30). It also reaches significant levels in human breast milk, providing a pathway for infant exposure (29). The toxicity of TCDD and other dioxins have, as a result, been intensely studied. Animal experimentation has demonstrated that, based on the minimal effective carcinogenic dose, TCDD is the most potent animal carcinogen yet discovered (31). There is mounting experimental evidence suggesting that TCDD may affect human fer- tility, because it is associated with anovulation and dysfunctional spermatogenesis in primates and other animals (32–35). Developmen- tal anomalies in infants may arise as a result of exposure via breast milk (36). Epidemiological studies have indicated that TCDD expo- Fig. 4. Effect of salicylates on xenobiotic-responsive element (XRE)-controlled tran- scription. Cells transfected with an XRE-controlled luciferase reporter vector and a vector sure is associated with an increase in many types of cancer, including expressing ␤-galactosidase were treated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD; lung, liver, and rectal cancers (3). TCDD has also been linked to 10 nM) for 24 h in the presence of increasing concentrations of salicylate. The amount of increased ischemic heart disease (37, 38). luciferase was normalized to ␤-galactosidase levels. n ϭ 3 Ϯ SE. Given the ubiquity of TCDD contamination and its adverse impact on human health, the mechanisms of TCDD toxicity are of great interest. TCDD does not bind DNA, which indicates that it is not directly genotoxic. The primary mechanism of biological damage by TCDD has been reported to be the generation of reactive oxygen species (39–41). This occurs as a consequence of CYP enzyme activity. A postulated mechanism for this is the auto-oxidation of the cytochrome P-450 mono-oxygenase complex, which generates super- oxide (40). Superoxide can spontaneously dismutate, liberating hy- drogen peroxide as a byproduct, which, in the presence of transition metals, can produce hydroxy radicals, leading to indiscriminate dam- age to cellular biomolecules, including DNA. This hypothesis is consistent with the observation that the deleterious effects of TCDD are dependent on the AhR. The basal expression of CYP is very low. Only after ligands of the receptor, such as TCDD, activate the AhR, does the expression of CYP1A1 (as well as CYP1A2 and CYP1B1) increase. This AhR-dependent mechanism has been demonstrated in AhR-null mice, which do not up-regulate CYP expression when challenged with TCDD and are unaffected by TCDD, even at doses that are 10 times higher than that which induces severe toxic and pathological effects in wild-type mice (10). Inhibition of AhR-mediated signal transduction would, therefore, Fig. 5. Effect of salicylamide (SAL) on aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activation. prevent TCDD-induced biological damage. We, and others, have HepG2 cells were incubated with DMSO or 10 nM 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin described natural and synthetic compounds that act in this regard, e.g., (TCDD) with or without 1 mM SAL for 2 h. Nuclear protein was isolated, and activated ␣ AhR in 10 ␮g of protein was measured by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Results are the synthetic -naphthoflavone acts antagonistically by representative of two separate experiments. competing with TCDD for binding of the AhR (42). However, by 432

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2004 American Association for Cancer Research. SAL INHIBITS AhR FUNCTION AND CYP1 EXPRESSION themselves, these compounds act as agonists, activating the AhR, ing the activation of the AhR to its DNA-binding form. This could resulting in an increase in CYP1A1 expression. Our laboratory has occur as a result of inhibiting the binding of the ligand to the receptor, recently characterized several naturally occurring that which was confirmed by ligand-binding assay. We demonstrated that act in this dual manner (43–45). The AhR is a promising molecular SAL substantially reduced the binding of TCDD to the cytosolic AhR target, and a pure antagonist of the AhR would be potentially thera- (Fig. 6). Although the inhibition was not completely blocked, this was 3 peutic for the prevention of human diseases that result from both acute most likely caused by the high levels (20 nM)of[H]-TCDD neces- and chronic TCDD exposure. In the present study, we have examined sary to elicit detectable binding in this assay system (46). three members of the salicylate family for their effects on the AhR. This is the first demonstration of SAL as a potent inhibitor of the These include salicylic acid, acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), and SAL, a AhR that, as a result, can block signal transduction initiated by TCDD natural phytochemical and two synthetic derivatives of salicylic acid, exposure. It is, furthermore, a pure antagonist of the AhR, unlike most respectively (for structures see Fig. 1). These compounds have im- other AhR inhibitors that have been characterized in this laboratory portant advantages, being relatively inexpensive, and more impor- and others. Unlike several other compounds that directly bind and tantly, they have already been used extensively in humans. Further- inhibit CYP enzyme activity, it is exceptionally long-lasting. Finally, more, SAL is commercially available in many pain remedy SAL has already been extensively used in humans; therefore, its safety preparations and is often prescribed for patients with aspirin sensi- and are already well established. SAL may, there- tivity. fore, serve as a promising chemopreventive compound that targets the There was a concentration-dependent decrease in TCDD-induced AhR. CYP enzyme activity, as measured by EROD assay, in HepG2 cells cotreated with SAL, but not in HepG2 cells cotreated with aspirin or salicylic acid (Fig. 2A). There is a sustained increase in EROD activity REFERENCES upon the addition of TCDD, because, unlike other ligands of the AhR 1. Hankinson, O. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. such as benzo(a)pyrene, TCDD is not metabolized by CYPs and is, Toxicol., 35: 307–340, 1995. thus, available to chronically activate the receptor. A single cotreat- 2. Rowlands, J. C., and Gustafsson, J. A. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated signal transduction. Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 27: 109–134, 1997. ment with SAL permanently inhibited this increase in a concentration- 3. McGregor, D. B., Partensky, C., Wilbourn, J., and Rice, J. M. An IARC evaluation dependent manner (Fig. 2B). The inhibitory effect of SAL on CYP of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans as risk fac- enzyme activity is, thus, long-lived. This is in contrast to the actions tors in human carcinogenesis. Environ. Health Perspect., 106S2: 755–760, 1998. 4. Bertazzi, P. A., Consonni, D., Bachetti, S., Rubagotti, M., Baccarelli, A., Zocchetti, of other well-known inhibitors of CYP activity, such as , C., and Pesatori, A. C. Health effects of dioxin exposure: a 20-year mortality study. ␣-naphthoflavone, dibenzoylmethane, , and quercetin. The Am. J. Epidemiol., 153: 1031–1044, 2001. inhibitory effects (at IC concentrations) of these compounds rapidly 5. Franc, M. A., Pohjanvirta, R., Tuomisto, J., and Okey, A. B. Persistent, low-dose 50 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin exposure: effect on aryl hydrocarbon receptor decline, presumably because they are metabolized by the cells, and expression in a dioxin-resistance model. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 175: 43–53, they are completely ineffective in abolishing TCDD-induced EROD 2001. 6. Slezak, B. P., Hamm, J. T., Reyna, J., Hurst, C. H., and Birnbaum, L. S. TCDD- activity after 48 h of incubation (data not shown). Therefore, SAL is mediated oxidative stress in male rat pups following perinatal exposure. J. Biochem. the only compound identified thus far that produces a sustained Mol. Toxicol., 16: 49–52, 2002. inhibition of TCDD-induced CYP enzyme activity. 7. Ushinohama, K., Son, D., Roby, K. F., Rozman, K. K., and Terranova, P. F. Impaired ovulation by 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in immature rats treated Two possible mechanisms may account for the inhibitory action by with equine chorionic gonadotropin. Reprod. Toxicol., 15: 275–280, 2001. SAL. First, SAL could directly bind to the CYP enzymes and inhibit 8. Kerkvliet, N. I. Immunological effects of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins. Environ. their activity. However, when cells were pretreated with TCDD to Health Perspect., 103S9: 47–53, 1995. 9. Grassman, J. A., Masten, S. A., Walker, N. J., and Lucier, G. W. Animal models of induce CYP activity, SAL treatment was ineffective (Table 1). Fur- human response to dioxins. Environ. Health Perspect., 106S2: 761–775, 1998. thermore, SAL added to microsomes isolated from TCDD-treated 10. Fernandez-Salguero, P. M., Hilbert, D. M., Rudikoff, S., Ward, J. M., and Gonzalez, cells also had no effect on CYP activity (Table 1). These results F. J. Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor-deficient mice are resistant to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorod- ibenzo-p-dioxin-induced toxicity. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 140: 173–179, 1996. indicate that SAL does not directly affect CYP enzyme activity. We, 11. Thun, M. J., Namboodiri, M. M., and Heath, C. W., Jr. Aspirin use and reduced risk therefore, hypothesized that the effect of SAL was at the level of CYP of fatal colon cancer. N. Engl. J. Med., 325: 1593–1596, 1991. 12. Schreinmacher, D. M., and Everson, R. B. Aspirin use and lung, colon, and breast expression. The effect on mRNA levels was investigated by reverse cancer incidence in a prospective study. Epidemiology, 5: 138–146, 1994. transcription-PCR, which demonstrated that CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and 13. Vainio, H., and Morgan, G. Cyclo-oxygenase 2 and breast cancer prevention. BMJ, CYP1B1 induction by TCDD was completely blocked in cells co- 317: 828–830, 1998. 14. Mehta, R. G., and Moon, R. C. Characterization of effective chemopreventive agents treated with SAL (Fig. 3A), but SAL treatment alone did not affect in mammary gland in vitro using an initiation-promotion protocol. Anticancer Res., basal CYP expression (Fig. 3B). This is in contrast to some other 11: 593–596, 1991. inhibitors of induced CYP expression, such as dibenzoylmethane (43), 15. Perkins, T. M., and Shklar, G. Delay in hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis by aspirin and indomethacin. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol., 53: 170–178, 1982. galangin (44), and curcumin (45), that act as agonists when adminis- 16. Long, W. P., Pray-Grant, M., Tsai, J. C., and Perdew, G. H. Protein kinase C activity tered alone. Because CYP expression is regulated by XREs, we is required for aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway-mediated signal transduction. Mol. Pharmacol., 53: 691–700, 1998. evaluated the effect of SAL on XRE-driven luciferase activity as a 17. Jorgensen, E. C., and Autrup, H. Autoregulation of human CYP1A1 gene promoter measure of transcription. SAL suppressed the up-regulation of XRE- activity in HepG2 and MCF-7 cells. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 17: 435–441, 1996. controlled transcription by TCDD in a concentration-dependent man- 18. Dolwick, K. M., Schmidt, J. V., Carver, L. A., Swanson, H. I., and Bradfield, C. A. Cloning and expression of a human Ah receptor cDNA. Mol. Pharmacol., 44: ner, whereas aspirin and salicylic acid, consistent with the lack of 911–917, 1993. effect on EROD activity, had no effect (Fig. 4). The reason that 19. Takahashi, Y., Itoh, S., Shimojima, T., and Kamataki, T. Characterization of Ah salicylic acid and aspirin are ineffective, despite their structural sim- receptor promoter in human liver cell line, HepG2. Pharmacogenetics, 4: 219–222, 1994. ilarity to SAL, is not known. 20. Ciolino, H. P., Daschner, P. J., and Yeh, G. C. Dietary flavonols quercetin and We used gel-shift assays to further determine whether SAL affected kaempferol are ligands of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor that affect CYP1A1 tran- scription differentially. Biochem. J., 340: 715–722, 1999. the binding of activated (ligand-bound) AhR to XREs present in the 21. Dohr, O., Vogel, C., and Abel, J. Different response of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo- promoter regions of CYP genes. As shown in Fig. 5, SAL inhibited p-dioxin (TCDD)-sensitive genes in human breast cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB 231 the binding of the TCDD-activated AhR to the XRE. We concluded cells. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 321: 405–412, 1995. 22. Chung, I., and Bresnick, E. 3-Methylcholanthrene-mediated induction of cytochrome from this that the decrease in TCDD-stimulated transcription and P4501A2 in human hepatoma HepG2 cells as quantified by the reverse transcription- mRNA levels caused by SAL (Figs. 3 and 4) was caused by prevent- polymerase chain reaction. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 314: 75–81, 1994. 433

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2004 American Association for Cancer Research. SAL INHIBITS AhR FUNCTION AND CYP1 EXPRESSION

23. Rosenthal, N. Identification of regulatory elements of cloned genes with functional 35. Kociba, R. J., Keeler, P. A., Park, C. N., and Gehring, P. J. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachloro- assays. Methods Enzymol., 152: 704–720, 1987. dibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD): results of a 13-week oral toxicity study in rats. Toxicol. 24. Denison, M. S., Fisher, J. M., and Whitlock, J. P. The DNA recognition site for the Appl. Pharmacol., 35: 553–574, 1976. dioxin-Ah receptor complex. Nucleotide sequence and functional analysis. J. Biol. 36. Pohl, H. R., and Hibbs, B. F. Breast-feeding exposure of infants to environmental Chem., 263: 17221–17224, 1988. contaminants–a public health risk assessment viewpoint: chlorinated dibenzodioxins 25. Chen, Y. H., and Tukey, R. H. Protein kinase C modulates regulation of the CYP1A1 and chlorinated dibenzofurans. Toxicol. Ind. Health, 12: 593–611, 1996. gene by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. J. Biol. Chem., 271: 26261–26266, 1996. 37. Flesch-Janys, D., Berger, J., Gurn, P., Manz, A., Nagel, S., Waltsgott, H., and Dwyer, 26. Raha, A., Reddy, V., Houser, W., and Bresnick, E. J. Binding characteristics of 4S J. H. Exposure to polychlorinated dioxins and furans (PCDD/F) and mortality in a cohort of workers from a herbicide-producing plant in Hamburg, Federal Republic of PAH-binding protein and Ah receptor from rats and mice. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Germany. Am. J. Epidemiol., 142: 1165–1175, 1995. 29: 339–355, 1990. 38. Dalton, T. P., Kerzee, J. K., Wang, B., Miller, M., Dieter, M. Z., Lorenz, J. N., 27. Ciolino, H. P., Wang, T. T., and Yeh, G. C. Diosmin and diosmetin are agonists of Shertzer, H. G., Nerbert, D. W., and Puga, A. Dioxin exposure is an environmental the aryl hydrocarbon receptor that differentially affect cytochrome P450 1A1 activity. risk factor for ischemic heart disease. Cardiovasc. Toxicol., 1: 285–298, 2001. Cancer Res., 58: 2754–2760, 1998. 39. Hassan, M. Q., Mohammadpour, H., Hermansky, S. J., Murray, W. J., and Stohs, S. J. 28. Mukerjee, D. Health impact of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins: a critical review. Comparative effects of BHA and ascorbic acid on the toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlo- J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 48: 157–165, 1998. rodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in rats. Gen. Pharmacol., 18: 547–550, 1987. 29. Pohjanvirta, R., and Tuomisto, J. Short-term toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo- 40. Stohs, S. J. Oxidative stress induced by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). p-dioxin in laboratory animals: effects, mechanisms, and animal models. Pharm. Rev., Free Radic. Biol. Med., 9: 79–90, 1990. 46: 483–549, 1994. 41. Park, J. Y., Shigenaga, M. K., and Ames, B. N. Induction of cytochrome P4501A1 by 30. Jensen, A. A. Polychlorobiphenyls (PCBs), polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin or indolo(3,2-b)carbazole is associated with ox- and polychlorodibenzofurans (PCDFs) in human milk, blood and adipose tissue. Sci. idative DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 2322–2327, 1996. Total Environ., 64: 259–293, 1987. 42. Merchant, M., Arellano, L., and Safe, S. The mechanism of action of alpha-naph- 31. TR-209: Carcinogenesis Bioassay of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (Chemical thoflavone as an inhibitor of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-induced CYP1A1 gene expression. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 281: 84–89, 1990. Abstract Service No. 1746-01-6) in Osborne-Mendel Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Gavage Study), National Technical Information Service no. PB82-163445). Research Trian- 43. MacDonald, C. J., Ciolino, H. P., and Yeh, G. C. Dibenzoylmethane modulates aryl hydrocarbon receptor function and expression of cytochromes P450 1A1, 1A2, and gle Park, NC: National Toxicology Program, 1982. 1B1. Cancer Res., 61: 3919–3924, 2001. 32. Peterson, R. E., Theobald, H. M., and Kimmel, G. L. Developmental and reproductive 44. Ciolino, H. P., and Yeh, G. C. The flavonoid galangin is an inhibitor of CYP1A1 toxicity of dioxins and related compounds: cross-species comparisons. Crit. Rev. activity and an agonist/antagonist of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Br. J. Cancer, 79: Toxicol., 23: 283–335, 1993. 1340–1346, 1999. 33. Allen, J. R., Barsotti, D. A., Lambrecht, L. K., and Van Miller, J. P. Reproductive 45. Ciolino, H. P., Daschner, P. J., Wang, T. T., and Yeh, G. C. Effect of curcumin on the effects of halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons on nonhuman primates. Ann. N. Y. aryl hydrocarbon receptor and cytochrome P450 1A1 in MCF-7 human breast Acad. Sci., 320: 419–425, 1979. carcinoma cells. Biochem. Pharmacol., 56: 197–206, 1998. 34. Barsotti, D. A., Abrahamson, L. J., and Allen, J. R. Hormonal alterations in female 46. Denison, M. S., Phelan, D., Winter, G. M., and Ziccardi, M. H. Carbaryl, a carbamate rhesus monkeys fed a diet containing 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Bull. En- insecticide, is a ligand for the hepatic Ah (dioxin) receptor. Toxicol. Appl. Pharma- viron. Contam. Toxicol., 21: 463–469, 1979. col., 152: 406–414, 1998.

434

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2004 American Association for Cancer Research. The Drug Salicylamide Is an Antagonist of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor That Inhibits Signal Transduction Induced by 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

Christopher J. MacDonald, Henry P. Ciolino and Grace Chao Yeh

Cancer Res 2004;64:429-434.

Updated version Access the most recent version of this article at: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/64/1/429

Cited articles This article cites 44 articles, 8 of which you can access for free at: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/64/1/429.full#ref-list-1

Citing articles This article has been cited by 4 HighWire-hosted articles. Access the articles at: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/64/1/429.full#related-urls

E-mail alerts Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal.

Reprints and To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Subscriptions Department at [email protected].

Permissions To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/64/1/429. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Rightslink site.

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 29, 2021. © 2004 American Association for Cancer Research.