DOCUMENT-RESUME ED 071.152 EA 004 650 AUTHOR Schultz

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DOCUMENT-RESUME ED 071.152 EA 004 650 AUTHOR Schultz DOCUMENT-RESUME ED 071.152 EA 004 650 AUTHOR Schultz, Theodore W. TITLE Education and Productivity. INSTITUTION National Commission on Productivity, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Jun 71 NOTE 14p.; Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (Stock No. 4000-0277, S.25) EDRS PRICE CIF -S0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS Cost Effectiveness; *Education; *Educational Economics; Educational Finance; Human Capital; *Investment; *Productivity; Publications; *Resource Allocations IDENTIFIERS *Economic Growth; Efficiency; Equity; Private Benefits; Social Benefits ABSTRACT In this paper, the author looks at the contribution of education to economic growth and examines the desirabilityof public vs private financing of education from the standpointof economic efficiency and equity. The authorsees expenditures on education as an investment in human capital, the contributionto output of such an investment depending on the amount of the investment and the realized rate of return. Hecompares the rates of return for differing levels of education to the rates of ret'Irnon nonhuman capital in the private domestic economy. In addition, the author discusses the financing of education in light of the social and private benefits that accrue from education. _Thepaper concludes with a few specific comments about the benefits and financing of higher education. (DN) NATIONAL COMMISSION Walter B. Wriston, Chairman. ON PRODUCTIVITY First National City Bank IW. Abel. President. United Steelworkers of America Joseph A Beim°, President. Membership Communications Workers of America Frank Fitzsimmons. President, International Brotherhood of Teamsters Lane Kirkland. SecretaryTreasurer, American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations Chairman John H. Lyons. President. Peter G. Peterson. International Association of Bridge. Secretary of Commerce Structural and Crnamental Iron Workers Members George Meany. George P. Shultz. President. Director. Office of Management and Budget American Federation of Labor and Congress of IntInstrial Organizations Beverly Briley. Mayor of Nashville Floyd E. Smith. President. John B. Connally. International Association of Machinists Secretary of the Treasury and Aerospace %Yorkers James D. Hodgson, Leonard Woodcock. Secretary of Labor President. International Union. Virginia Knauer. United Automobile, Aerospace and Special Assistant to the President Agricultural Implement Workers of America for Consumer Affairs Wham T. Coleman. Jr.. Arch A. Moore. Dilworth. Paxson. Kalish. Governor of West Virginia Levy & Coleman Herbert Stein. John T. Dunlop. Chairman. Professor of Political Economy Council of Economic Advisers and Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Stephen D. Bechtel. Jr.. Harvard University President. Bechtel Corporation Hosard W. Johnson. Chairman, Corporatioi, of Berkeley Burrell. the Massachusetts Institute of Technology President, National Business League Kuhfuss. President. Edward William Carter. American Farm Bureau President. Bra- dwayHale Stores, Inc. Edward H. Levi. President, Archie K. Davis. University of Chicago President. Chamber of Commerce of U.S. Areal Miller Dean, Graduate School of Business, R. Heath Larry, Stanford University Vice Chairman of the Board. United States Steel Corporation John Scott. Master of the National Grange James M. Roche. Member of the Board. W. Allen Wallis. General Motors Corporation Chancellor, University of Rochester M. Peter Venema. Chairman of the Board, Leon Greenberg. National Association of Manufacturers Staff Director a U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. I (N., EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION LC"` THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO. S"'"4 DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG. r"* INATING IT. POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN. IONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY N's REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDU C.) CATION POSITION OR POLICY. EDUCATION AND PRODUCTIVITY Prepared for the National Commission on Productivity By: Theodore W. Schultz Professor of Economics The University of Chicago June 1971 Preface The National Commission on Productivity was established by President Richard Nixon in June 1970 to develop recommendations for programs and policies to improve the productivity of the U.S. economy. The Commission is composed of top-level representatives of business, labor, government, and the public. In order to aid the members in their consideration of various topics, staff papers will be prepared by government or private industry experts in different subject matter fields. These papers serve as background material for the members but do not necessarily represent their views. This paper was prepared by Theodore W. Schultz, Professor of Economics, the University of Chicago. Professor Schultz presents an economic perspective for interpreting studies dealing with the return on investment in schooling and higher education and on the allocation of resources in education and research. iii . Contents PART A.EDUCATION AND GROWTH i 1. The Evidence I 2. The Interpretations 3 3. Conclusions 3 PART B. RESOURCE ALLOCATION 4 1. Economic Efficiency Considerations 5 2. Equity Considerations 7 3. Concluding Comment 7 APPENDIXES A. References on Education and Growth 9 B. References on Resource Allocation 10 iv Part A. EDUCATION AND GROWTH The services of laborunskilled. skilled, including sion of economics is the development associated with all technical and professional workersaccount for the allocation of "time" by Becker (1965 Oan out- about four-fifths of the output of the U.S.economy and growth of the-role that earnings foregone plays in the the rest comes mainly from the productive services of formation of human capital and in a widearray of physical capital, i.e., (tom structures. equipment and nomnarket activities. land. The acquired skills of labor account inturn for The core of fiat available evidencecan be sum- most of the services of xtbor. The contribution of marized by presenting the rate of return estimates. It "brute labor- to production is small and it is diminish- is these rates of return that reveal what schooling and ing. Thus, a head count of laborers that failsto reckon higher education are contributing per dollar of invest- the value of skills is a very imperfectmeasure because ment to growth. In general, they show that the rate of it does not take account of the difference in the skills of return to higher education it ow additional earnings is laborers. Moreover, these skills have become increas- approximately in line with the rate ofreturn in the ingly important in explaining the growing abundance economy taken in its entirety even though the personal of the goods and-services. satisfactions that. accrue to students from their educa- My approach to the role ofeducAation in growth tion over their life time are not taken intoaccount. tests on the following propositions: (1) Increases in High school ranks higher by thistest and elementary output come predominantly -front the growth in real schooling is at the top as the following estimates show. factor inputs and only to a minor extent from "total The rate of return to investment in elementary factor productivity'. (2) The growth in theproduc- schooling appears to be upwards of 100percent. The tive services per laborer is mainly a'consequenceof first estimates. Schultz (1961, A). which is admittedly additional skills. (31 Lei eases in the general levelof a rough approximation. place it at about 35 percent. skills are attained slowly and, as a rule, graduall' over Hanoch's (1965, 1967) privaterates of return derived tune; they are in this sense long run developments from a one in thousand sample of the 1960census and not to be had either quickly or suddenly. (41 The are in the neighborhood of 100 percent. Theycon- acquisition of skills that account for the additional firm the estimates of Hansen (1963). (Thememay he quality of labor over timeconic in large part from some upward bias here because of changes in the schooling and education and associated activities. (51 no-schooling reference class.) The acquisition of these skills is inessence an invest- Becker's (1964) estimates for high schoolgraduates ment in human capital and its contributionto output restricted to white males, after personalincome taxes. depends upon the ammitt of the investmentand upon show that the private rate of the realized rate of return. return rose from 16 percent in 1939 to 28 percent in 1958 and that it has risen slightly since then. But unlike the 1. The Evidence upward trend in the rate of return to high schoolgraduates. collCge The extension of economics in analyzinghuman graduate %vete earning over thesame period in the capital is of two basic parts. The"capital'. part rests neighborhood of 15 percenton their private investment on the proposition that certain types of expenditures in their college education. (Earningsforf.g,one are in- create productive stocks embodied inman that provide cluded as part of the- teal cost of this inkcstment ) services for future periods. (Schultz.1961 A and B.) In estimating the rate ofreturn on the private cost These services consist both of personalsatisfactions that of graduate work borne by students.much depends on accrue directly to the person and of productive services how one treats the stipends thatare 'awarded to grad- that enhance his earnings. The other part of this exten- uate students. Treating them as earnings, for which 1 a very plausible case can be made, the private rate The private rates of return to schooling and higher of return to
Recommended publications
  • Consequences of Government Deficits and Debt
    Consequences of Government Deficits and Debt∗ Glenn Hubbard Columbia University and NBER Over many years, Ben Friedman’s economic research and writings in political economy frame economic analysis of— and moral consideration of—large government budget deficits and the need for fiscal consolidation in the United States. In his book The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth, Friedman emphasizes the salutary effects economic growth for openness and social cohesion. This essay emphasizes economic analysis of government budget deficits. The U.S. economy did not, in many respects, flounder after the budget deficits of the 1980s. Indeed, by the middle of the 1990s, the U.S. economy began a long-lasting expansion in productivity growth. While direct crowding out of private investment through higher real interest rates has, at least in the view of the empirical evidence reviewed in this essay, been modest, three concerns remain. The first is that cumulative increases in debt are now so large that even the small estimated effects identified here can lead to large increases in real interest rates. The second is that one atten- uation of effects of higher government debt levels on interest rates may trace to greater reliance on foreign saving, with an accompanying problem of imbalances. The third is that the present trajectory of government spending in the United States presents the very real possibility of higher tax burdens, reduc- ing capital formation, economic growth, and living standards. JEL Code: H6. ∗The author is Dean and Russell L. Carson Professor of Finance and Econom- ics, Columbia Business School; Professor of Economics, Columbia University; and Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theory of Capitalist Regulation and the Development of American Higher Education
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 332 607 HE 024 568 AUTHOR Barrow, Clyde W. TITLE The Theory of Capitalist Regulation and the Development of American Higher Education. PUB DATE Apr 91 NOTE 35p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, April 3-7, 1991). PUB TYPE Speeches/Conference Papers (150) -- Viewpoints (Opinion/Position Papers, Essays, etc.) (120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Capitalism; Cultural Influences; Economic Factors; *Educational Change; *Educational Development; *Educational History; Governance; Higher Education; *Marxian Analysis; Po'..tical Influences ABSTRACT This paper outlines a neomarxist theoretical framework for interpreting the history ofAmerican higher education. It argues that onecan best explain the development of American higher institutions as part ofa theory of capitalist development, because higher institutions are generally dependenton external patronage and, therefore, on the capitalist class. Drawingon Agliettes "theory of capitalist regulation," thepaper suggests that the competitive, corporate, and state-capitalist phasesof development have each resulted ina different structural form of higher education. Each structuralform is characterized by its own types of governance, administration, curriculum, and teachinglinked to the economic, cultural, and political interests ofan ascendant segment of the capitalist class. Contains 55rE.:rences. (Author) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Labour, Digital Media and Capitalism
    Academic Labour, Digital Media and Capitalism Special Issue, edited by Thomas Allmer and Ergin Bulut tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique 16 (1), 2018, pp. 44-240 http://www.triple-c.at Academic Labour, Digital Media and Capitalism Special Issue, edited by Thomas Allmer and Ergin Bulut tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique 16 (1), 2018, pp. 44-240 Table of Contents Thomas Allmer and Ergin Bulut: Introduction: Academic Labour, Digital Media and Capitalism, pp. 44-48 Thomas Allmer: Theorising and Analysing Academic Labour, pp. 49-77 Maxime Ouellet and Éric Martin: University Transformations and the New Knowledge Production Regime in Informational Capitalism, pp. 78-96 Richard Hall: On the Alienation of Academic Labour and the Possibilities for Mass Intellectuality, pp. 97-113 Marco Briziarelli and Joseph L. Flores: Professing Contradictions: Knowledge Work and the Neoliberal Condition of Academic Workers, pp. 114-128 Jamie Woodcock: Digital Labour in the University: Understanding the Transformations of Academic Work in the UK, pp. 129-142 Jan Fernback: Academic/Digital Work: ICTs, Knowledge Capital, and the Question of Educational Quality, pp. 143-158 Christophe Magis: Manual Labour, Intellectual Labour and Digital (Academic) Labour. The Practice/Theory Debate in the Digital Humanities, pp. 159-175 Karen Gregory and sava saheli singh: Anger in Academic Twitter: Sharing, Caring, and Getting Mad Online, pp. 176-193 Andreas Wittel: Higher Education as a Gift and as a Commons, pp. 194-213 Zeena Feldman and Marisol Sandoval: Metric Power and the Academic Self: Neoliberalism, Knowledge and Resistance in the British University, pp. 214-233 Güven Bakırezer, Derya Keskin Demirer and Adem Yeşilyurt: In Pursuit of an Alternative Academy: The Case of Kocaeli Academy for Solidarity (Non-Peer-Reviewed Reflection Article), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Equity in Education Thematic Review
    EQUITY IN EDUCATION THEMATIC REVIEW COUNTRY ANALYTICAL REPORT FINLAND Finnish Ministry of Education Mars 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: COUNTRY CONTEXT AND CURRENT EQUITY SITUATION .................................. 4 CHAPTER 1. CULTURAL AND SOCIAL FACTORS................................................................................ 4 1.1. Historical background..................................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Comprehensive school.................................................................................................................... 4 1.3. Confidence in the significance of education................................................................................... 5 1.4. Teachers’ social prestige................................................................................................................. 5 1.5. Social and cultural homogeneity..................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 2. THE EDUCATION SYSTEM IN FINLAND......................................................................... 6 2.1. Pre-primary education..................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Comprehensive school (basic education)........................................................................................ 7 2.3. Secondary education......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural and Linguistic Capital, Standardized Tests and the Perpetuation of Educational Inequities
    Running head: CAPITAL AND STANDARDIZED TESTS 1 CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC CAPITAL, STANDARDIZED TESTS AND THE PERPETUATION OF EDUCATIONAL INEQUITIES By Jessica Ayre A GRADUATING PAPER SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF EDUCATION IN THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Educational Administration and Leadership) Dr. Wendy Poole Supervisor Dr. Gerald Fallon Second Reader THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA February, 2012 CAPITAL AND STANDARDIZED TESTS 2 Abstract Students who possess the socioeconomic, cultural and linguistic capital of the dominant class come to school with a “head start” and stand to benefit most from standardized tests. In my conceptual study examining the relationship between socioeconomic, cultural and linguistic capital, and educational attainment, I employ a critical review of the pertinent literature beginning with Bourdieu and Passeron’s seminal work. Although researchers have been operationalizing Bourdieu’s cultural capital theory for over thirty years, it is clear that there has been little agreement as to how cultural capital should be measured, or even if it can be measured. I argue that much of the empirical research critiquing the impact of Bourdieu’s notion of cultural and linguistic capital on educational attainment has been operationalized from a positivist perspective and based on narrow conceptions of Bourdieu’s theory, and consequently, has provided inconclusive and often contradictory results. Utilizing a definition of cultural capital more closely aligned with that intended by Bourdieu, I examine the connection between socioeconomic, cultural and linguistic capital, and standardized tests, and explore how educational inequities are perpetuated through the use of standardized forms of assessment, discussing the implications of my findings for educational practice throughout.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the President on the Activities of the Council of Economic Advisers During 2009
    APPENDIX A REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS DURING 2009 letter of transmittal Council of Economic Advisers Washington, D.C., December 31, 2009 Mr. President: The Council of Economic Advisers submits this report on its activities during calendar year 2009 in accordance with the requirements of the Congress, as set forth in section 10(d) of the Employment Act of 1946 as amended by the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978. Sincerely, Christina D. Romer, Chair Austan Goolsbee, Member Cecilia Elena Rouse, Member 307 Council Members and Their Dates of Service Name Position Oath of office date Separation date Edwin G. Nourse Chairman August 9, 1946 November 1, 1949 Leon H. Keyserling Vice Chairman August 9, 1946 Acting Chairman November 2, 1949 Chairman May 10, 1950 January 20, 1953 John D. Clark Member August 9, 1946 Vice Chairman May 10, 1950 February 11, 1953 Roy Blough Member June 29, 1950 August 20, 1952 Robert C. Turner Member September 8, 1952 January 20, 1953 Arthur F. Burns Chairman March 19, 1953 December 1, 1956 Neil H. Jacoby Member September 15, 1953 February 9, 1955 Walter W. Stewart Member December 2, 1953 April 29, 1955 Raymond J. Saulnier Member April 4, 1955 Chairman December 3, 1956 January 20, 1961 Joseph S. Davis Member May 2, 1955 October 31, 1958 Paul W. McCracken Member December 3, 1956 January 31, 1959 Karl Brandt Member November 1, 1958 January 20, 1961 Henry C. Wallich Member May 7, 1959 January 20, 1961 Walter W. Heller Chairman January 29, 1961 November 15, 1964 James Tobin Member January 29, 1961 July 31, 1962 Kermit Gordon Member January 29, 1961 December 27, 1962 Gardner Ackley Member August 3, 1962 Chairman November 16, 1964 February 15, 1968 John P.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Economic Report of the President
    APPENDIX A REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS DURING 2016 letter of transmittal Council of Economic Advisers Washington, D.C., December 15, 2016 Mr. President: The Council of Economic Advisers submits this report on its activities during calendar year 2016 in accordance with the requirements of the Congress, as set forth in section 10(d) of the Employment Act of 1946 as amended by the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978. Sincerely yours, Jason Furman, Chairman Sandra E. Black, Member Jay C. Shambaugh, Member Activities of the Council of Economic Advisers During 2016 | 547 Council Members and Their Dates of Service Name Position Oath of office date Separation date Edwin G. Nourse Chairman August 9, 1946 November 1, 1949 Leon H. Keyserling Vice Chairman August 9, 1946 Acting Chairman November 2, 1949 Chairman May 10, 1950 January 20, 1953 John D. Clark Member August 9, 1946 Vice Chairman May 10, 1950 February 11, 1953 Roy Blough Member June 29, 1950 August 20, 1952 Robert C. Turner Member September 8, 1952 January 20, 1953 Arthur F. Burns Chairman March 19, 1953 December 1, 1956 Neil H. Jacoby Member September 15, 1953 February 9, 1955 Walter W. Stewart Member December 2, 1953 April 29, 1955 Raymond J. Saulnier Member April 4, 1955 Chairman December 3, 1956 January 20, 1961 Joseph S. Davis Member May 2, 1955 October 31, 1958 Paul W. McCracken Member December 3, 1956 January 31, 1959 Karl Brandt Member November 1, 1958 January 20, 1961 Henry C. Wallich Member May 7, 1959 January 20, 1961 Walter W.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the President on the Activities of the Council of Economic Advisers During 2011
    APPENDIX A REPORT TO THE PRESIDENT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS DURING 2011 letter of transmittal Council of Economic Advisers Washington, D.C., December 31, 2011 Mr. President: The Council of Economic Advisers submits this report on its activities during calendar year 2011 in accordance with the requirements of the Congress, as set forth in section 10(d) of the Employment Act of 1946 as amended by the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978. Sincerely, Alan B. Krueger, Chairman Katharine G. Abraham, Member Carl Shapiro, Member Activities of the Council of Economic Advisers During 2011 | 295 Council Members and Their Dates of Service Name Position Oath of office date Separation date Edwin G. Nourse Chairman August 9, 1946 November 1, 1949 Leon H. Keyserling Vice Chairman August 9, 1946 Acting Chairman November 2, 1949 Chairman May 10, 1950 January 20, 1953 John D. Clark Member August 9, 1946 Vice Chairman May 10, 1950 February 11, 1953 Roy Blough Member June 29, 1950 August 20, 1952 Robert C. Turner Member September 8, 1952 January 20, 1953 Arthur F. Burns Chairman March 19, 1953 December 1, 1956 Neil H. Jacoby Member September 15, 1953 February 9, 1955 Walter W. Stewart Member December 2, 1953 April 29, 1955 Raymond J. Saulnier Member April 4, 1955 Chairman December 3, 1956 January 20, 1961 Joseph S. Davis Member May 2, 1955 October 31, 1958 Paul W. McCracken Member December 3, 1956 January 31, 1959 Karl Brandt Member November 1, 1958 January 20, 1961 Henry C. Wallich Member May 7, 1959 January 20, 1961 Walter W.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis Applying the Sen-Bourdieu Analytical Framework
    This is a repository copy of Education, inequality and social justice: a critical analysis applying the Sen-Bourdieu analytical framework. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/136904/ Version: Published Version Article: Hart, C.S. (2019) Education, inequality and social justice: a critical analysis applying the Sen-Bourdieu analytical framework. Policy Futures in Education, 17 (5). pp. 582-598. ISSN 1478-2103 https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318809758 © 2018 The Authors. This is an author-produced version of a paper subsequently published in Policy Futures in Education. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self- archiving policy. Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Special Issue: Capital and Capability: Re-imagining Social Justice in and through Education Policy Futures in Education 0(0) 1–17 Education, inequality and ! The Author(s) 2018 social justice: A critical Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions analysis applying DOI: 10.1177/1478210318809758 the Sen-Bourdieu journals.sagepub.com/home/pfe Analytical Framework Caroline Sarojini Hart University of Sheffield, UK Abstract This paper offers a critical examination of the nature of inequalities in relation to education and the pursuit of social justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Machinc the Basic Concepts. Second Edition
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 2IL-719D SO 015 821 Saunders, Phillip; And Others TITLE :aster Curriculum guide in Economics. A Frames orl: -Eor Machinc the Basic Concepts. Second Edition. INSTITUTION Joint Council on Economic Education, New York, N.Y. REPORT NO S2EE-Checklist-335 PUB DATE Sf.1- NOTE 82;2.; Replaces ED 148 648. AVAILABLE FROMJoint Council on Economic Education,2 Park Lve., New York, NY 10016 ($5.00). PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Guides (For Teachers) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS DESCRIPTORS Citizenship Education; Concept Formation; *Concept Teaching; *Curriculum Development; *Decision Making Skills; Economic Change; Economic Climate; Economic Development; Economic Factors; *Economics Education; Educational Objectives; Elementary Secondary Education; Fundamental Concepts; Models; Problem Solving ABSTRACT Intended for curriculum developers, this revised Framework presents a set of basic concepts for teaching K-12 economics. The revision reflects the change and development which the field of economics has undergone and includes improvements suggested by users of the first edi'Lion. The purpose of teaching economics is to impart a general understanding of now our economy works and to improve economic decision making by students through the use of an orderly, reasoned approach. Chapters I,II, and III provide a brief introduction to the publication, discuss the elements of economic understanding, and list and describe some basic economic concepts. Chapter TV discusses the broad social goals that seem most important in the United States todE7, the problem of trade-offs among goals, and the role of self-i7-?.rest and personal values. Chapter V .1ustrates the use of decision-making model with two economic izsues involving public policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Struggling with Capital: a Bourdieusian Analysis of Educational Strategies Among Internationally Mobile Middle Class Families in Sweden
    Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education ISSN: 0159-6306 (Print) 1469-3739 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cdis20 Struggling with capital: a Bourdieusian analysis of educational strategies among internationally mobile middle class families in Sweden Jennifer Waddling, Emil Bertilsson & Mikael Palme To cite this article: Jennifer Waddling, Emil Bertilsson & Mikael Palme (2019) Struggling with capital: a Bourdieusian analysis of educational strategies among internationally mobile middle class families in Sweden, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40:5, 697-716, DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2019.1598610 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2019.1598610 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 29 Mar 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 420 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cdis20 DISCOURSE: STUDIES IN THE CULTURAL POLITICS OF EDUCATION 2019, VOL. 40, NO. 5, 697–716 https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2019.1598610 Struggling with capital: a Bourdieusian analysis of educational strategies among internationally mobile middle class families in Sweden Jennifer Waddling, Emil Bertilsson and Mikael Palme All of Uppsala University, Sociology of Education and Culture (SEC), Sweden ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Drawing on empirical data regarding educational strategies among Global middle class; internationally mobile families in the Stockholm-Uppsala region, this international mobility; study questions the notion of a global middle class. First, a international schools; quantitative analysis shows that immigrating middle class Bourdieu; capital conversion; educational strategies professionals and their children are few, having marginal impact on the demand for international education.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Cosmopolitan Capital
    Hugvísindasvið Developing Cosmopolitan Capital Gaining Cosmopolitan Capital Through Study Abroad Ritgerð til MA-prófs í enskukennslu Sólrún H. Guðmundsdóttir Maí 2015 University of Iceland School of Humanities MA in English Teaching Developing Cosmopolitan Capital Gaining Cosmopolitan Capital Through Study Abroad Thesis for Master’s Degree in English Teaching Sólrún H. Guðmundsdóttir Kt.: 130788-3279 Thesis Advisor: Birna Arnbjörnsdóttir May 2015 Developing Cosmopolitan Capital Developing Cosmopolitan Capital Abstract This thesis examines the notion of Cosmopolitan Capital in relation to educational opportunities of Icelandic youth. Cosmopolitan Capital is the transnational resources, such as language skills, openness towards cultural diversity and international experience that help people with intercultural learning and to acquire the skills needed in the modern globalized world. The notion of Cosmopolitan Capital is explored on two levels. Firstly, the role of immigrant children in the Cosmopolitan Capital of the country as a whole and secondly, whether Icelandic youth can attain Cosmopolitan Capital through student exchange programs and/or study abroad. This is a qualitative study involving semi-structured and semi-open interviews. The study focuses on secondary school students in the Reykjavík area and two groups of students were interviewed. The first group is made up of students that went through AFS as exchange students and spent a full year in their respective countries. The latter group partook in a short student exchange, they spent a week in Iceland hosting a French student and then went to France to participate in an Erasmus+ project whilst staying with the student they previously hosted. The overlooked capital Iceland possesses in immigrants is discussed as well as the options the educational system has to utilize that capital.
    [Show full text]