DOCSLIB.ORG

2. the Romania Experience

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2. the Romania Experience A Multi-Partner Evaluation of the Comprehensive Development Framework Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Implementation of CDF Principles in a Transition Economy A Case Study of Romanian Experience Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank cannot guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply on the part of the World Bank any judgment of the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Contact: Operations Evaluation Department Partnerships & Knowledge Programs (OEDPK) e-mail: [email protected] Telephone: 202-458-4497 Facsimile: 202-522-3125 http:/www.worldbank.org/oed iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations and Acronyms ......................................................................................................vi Foreword ......................................................................................................................................vii Executive Summary....................................................................................................................... x Main Findings: the “CDF Consultations” of 1999-2000................................................. xii Main Findings: The CDF Experience in Romania since 2000........................................xiii 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................1 2. The Romania Experience ............................................................................................3 Current Socioeconomic Context and Trends...................................................................... 3 Composition and Significance of Development Assistance to Romania............. 10 Watersheds in the Evolution of CDF in Romania ............................................... 11 3. The Evidence: Progress, Constraints, Issues...........................................................16 3.1 Holistic, Long-Term Development Framework.......................................................... 16 Romania’s Overarching Long-Term Vision for Development............................ 16 Romania’s Strategic Planning Process, 1998-2000 ............................................. 17 Present State of Long-Term Planning in Romania .............................................. 20 3.2 Country Ownership .................................................................................................... 21 Progress in Building Consensus for the Long-Term Vision................................ 21 Issues Regarding Consultative Processes ............................................................ 24 Future Challenge Regarding Consultative Practices ........................................... 28 3.3 Country-Led Partnership ........................................................................................... 28 Progress and Issues in Moving toward Country-Led Partnership ....................... 29 Aid Coordination Mechanisms and Processes..................................................... 30 Strategic Alignment and Donor Comparative Advantage ................................... 34 Harmonization of Donor Procedures and Practices............................................. 35 Analytical and Diagnostic Work ......................................................................... 36 Aid Delivery Modes and Country Capacity ........................................................ 36 Challenges for Country-led Partnership .............................................................. 37 3.4 Results Orientation..................................................................................................... 38 Progress in Establishing a Results Orientation.................................................... 38 Challenges Ahead................................................................................................ 46 iv 4. CDF Interrelationships..............................................................................................48 5. Main Conclusions and Challenges Ahead ...............................................................49 A Stream with Multiple Tributaries .................................................................................. 49 The Four CDF Principles: Conclusions, Issues, and Challenges ................................................. 49 Long-term Holistic Development Framework..................................................... 49 Country Ownership.............................................................................................. 50 Country-led Partnership....................................................................................... 51 Results Orientation .............................................................................................. 52 Tables Table 1: Macroeconomic Indicators........................................................................................ 3 Table 2: Comparative Economic Performance Indicators ...................................................... 4 Table 3: Romania's Unemployment Rates .............................................................................. 5 Table 4: Poverty in Romania, 1995-2001 ............................................................................... 6 Table 5: Social Indicators for Five Central and Eastern European Countries......................... 7 Table 6: Trends in Selected Socioeconomic Indicators in Romania: 1998-2000/2002 .......... 8 Table 7: Romania's Top Ten Donors of Development Assistance........................................ 12 Table 8: Governing Program Action Plan Examples............................................................ 42 Table 9: National Anti-Poverty and Social Promotion Inclusion Action Plan Goals ........... 44 Table 10: Comparison of Millennium Development Goals and Targets with National Anti-Poverty and Social Inclusion Promotion Action Plan .................................... 45 Boxes Box 1: Entrepreneurial Responses to Transition Challenges ....................................................... 11 Box 2: Emergence of the Regional Development System as a CDF-like Process ....................... 14 Box 3: Survey Questionnaire Findings on CDF Implementation at the Regional Level ............. 16 Box 4: CDF Challenges for the World Bank Country Team........................................................ 16 Box 5: Business Environment Action Plan .................................................................................. 23 Box 6: Public Information Access Initiative ................................................................................ 23 Box 7: Jiu Valley Consultative Process........................................................................................ 24 Box 8: Civil Society: Progress and Challenges............................................................................ 26 Box 9: Donor Consultation: A Private Sector View..................................................................... 28 Box 10: Stakeholder Views on Country-led Partnership in Romania ............................................ 30 Box 11: World Bank-GOR Joint Portfolio Review Exercises: Bimodal Participation and Partnership........................................................................................................................ 31 Box 12: The Child Protection Group: Good Practice in Country-led Partnership ......................... 32 Box 13: A New Potential Good Practice Example: The National Intersectoral HIV/AIDS Commission ...................................................................................................................... 32 Box 14: Stakeholder Views on Partnership at the Project Level: Results from a Questionnaire Survey............................................................................................................................... 33 Box 15: A Spurned Country Proposal for Coordination at the Macro Policy Level...................... 33 Box 16: Putting Romania in the Aid Coordination Driver's Seat: Desires and Frustrations.......... 34 Box 17: A Cacophony of Consultants............................................................................................ 38 v Figures Figure 1: Prevalence of Optimism in Romania, 1991-2000 ...................................................................... 9 Figure 2: Trust in Public Institutions in Romania, 1990-2001.................................................................... 9 Figure B-1. Frequency of Information Access on Development Programs/Projects ..................... 71 Figure B-2. Quality of Information on Development Programs/Projects in Romania .................. 71 Figure B-3. Assessment of CDF-like Characteristics for Selected Programs/Projects ................ 74 Figure B-4. The Key Concerns/Interests of Respondents about Improving CDF Implementation in Romania ............................................................................................................................................... 84 Figure B-5. CDF Country Progress: Stakeholder Assessments as of March 2002.................................... 85 Annexes Annex A. Interview and Questionnaire Methodology.............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fighting Corruption with Con Tricks: Romania's Assault On
    FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS: ROMANIA’S ASSAULT ON THE RULE OF LAW David Clark FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS: ROMANIA’S ASSAULT ON THE RULE OF LAW 2 FIGHTING CORRUPTION WITH CON TRICKS Executive Summary Democracy in Europe is facing its greatest challenge since the fall of the Berlin Wall. The threat comes not only from the rise of political movements that openly reject liberal democratic values, including the governing parties of Hungary and Poland, but also from the risk of creeping authoritarianism caused by a gradual decline in standards of governance and the weakening of important democratic underpinnings, such as the rule of law. Romania is a country of particular concern. Although it has earned international praise for its recent efforts to stamp out corruption, a detailed examination of Romania’s anti-corruption activities shows that they often provide convenient cover for acts of political score settling and serious human rights violations. The methods used show a considerable degree of continuity with the practices and attitudes of the communist era. The strong correlation between those targeted for prosecution and the interests of those in power is indicative of politicised justice. Cases have often been accompanied by campaigns of public vilification designed to maximise their political impact. Far from being above politics, Romania’s National Anti-corruption Directorate (DNA) is an active participant in its partisan struggles. Although the rule of law requires the justice system to work independently of government, there is clear evidence of collusion between prosecutors and the executive in Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • The Agricultural Sector in Poland and Romania and Its Performance Under the EU-Influence
    Arbeitshefte aus dem Otto-Strammer-Zentrum Nr. 21 Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, 2013 The Agricultural Sector in Poland and Romania and its Performance under the EU-Influence Von Simone Drost März 2013 CONTENT 1INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................... 6 2THE CHARACTER OF THE EU’S CAP: AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH....................................7 2.1The early CAP: From preventing food shortage to producing surpluses........................................................7 2.2Failed attempts of reform and years of immobility...............................................................................................8 2.3The MacSharry reform of 1991/92: Introducing fundamental structural changes...................................8 2.4Agenda 2000........................................................................................................................................................................8 2.5The 2003 reform: Fischler II..........................................................................................................................................9 2.62008 CAP Health Check....................................................................................................................................................9 2.72010 to 2013: Europe 2020 and the CAP................................................................................................................10 2.8Conclusion: Developing
    [Show full text]
  • Romania Redivivus
    alexander clapp ROMANIA REDIVIVUS nce the badlands of neoliberal Europe, Romania has become its bustling frontier. A post-communist mafia state that was cast to the bottom of the European heap by opinion- makers sixteen years ago is now billed as the success story Oof eu expansion.1 Its growth rate at nearly 6 per cent is the highest on the continent, albeit boosted by fiscal largesse.2 In Bucharest more politicians have been put in jail for corruption over the past decade than have been convicted in the rest of Eastern Europe put together. Romania causes Brussels and Berlin almost none of the headaches inflicted by the Visegrád Group—Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia— which in 1993 declined to accept Romania as a peer and collectively entered the European Union three years before it. Romanians con- sistently rank among the most Europhile people in the Union.3 An anti-eu party has never appeared on a Romanian ballot, much less in the parliament. Scattered political appeals to unsavoury interwar traditions—Legionnairism, Greater Romanianism—attract fewer voters than do far-right movements across most of Western Europe. The two million Magyars of Transylvania, one of Europe’s largest minorities, have become a model for inter-ethnic relations after a time when the park benches of Cluj were gilded in the Romanian tricolore to remind every- one where they were. Indeed, perhaps the aptest symbol of Romania’s place in Europe today is the man who sits in the Presidential Palace of Cotroceni in Bucharest. Klaus Iohannis—a former physics teacher at a high school in Sibiu, once Hermannstadt—is an ethnic German head- ing a state that, a generation ago, was shipping hundreds of thousands of its ‘Saxons’ ‘back’ to Bonn at 4,000–10,000 Deutschmarks a head.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania - Adopted on 22 June 2017 Published on 16 February 2018
    ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV(2017)005 Fourth Opinion on Romania - adopted on 22 June 2017 Published on 16 February 2018 Summary The authorities in Romania promote respect and understanding in society and representatives of most national minorities report an overall embracing attitude prevailing between the majority and the minorities. The authorities have made efforts to promote minority cultures and education, and particular steps which have been taken to facilitate representation of national minorities in parliament are widely recognised and appreciated. The Law on Education remains the main legislative basis for teaching in and of national minority languages. A consolidated and coherent legal framework related to the protection of minority rights is lacking and the draft Law on the Status of National Minorities, proposed in parliament in 2006, has still not been adopted. Existing legislation regulating different aspects of national minority protection is disjointed, piecemeal, full of grey zones and open to contradictory interpretation. A coherent policy to guarantee access to minority rights is still lacking and respect of rights of persons belonging to national minorities varies according to local conditions and the goodwill of the municipal or regional authorities. Persistence of negative attitudes and prejudice against the Roma and anti-Hungarian sentiment is of considerable concern. Despite the resolute stance of the National Council for Combating Discrimination, court rulings and statements from the authorities, racist incidents continue to be reported. The revised Strategy for the Inclusion of Romanian Citizens Belonging to the Roma Minority – 2012-2020, adopted in 2015, sets targets in the key areas of education, employment, health and housing and addresses also promotion and protection of Roma culture and participation in public and political life.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Mine Methane Country Profiles, Chapter 29, June 2015
    29 Romania 29.1 Summary of Coal Industry 29.1.1 ROLE OF COAL IN ROMANIA Coal accounts for 29 percent of energy production in Romania (EIA, 2014). Romania’s proven coal reserves are estimated at about 291 million tonnes (Mmt) and the country ranks 20th worldwide in coal production (see Table 29-1). More than 80 percent of Romanian lignite reserves can be mined profitably in opencast mines, while the remaining 20 percent require underground mining (Euracoal, 2014; WEC, 2000). Table 29-1. Romania’s Coal Reserves and Production Sub- Anthracite & bituminous Total Global Rank Indicator Bituminous & Lignite (million tonnes) (# and %) (million tonnes) (million tonnes) Estimated Proved Coal Reserves 10.0 281.0 291.0 43 (0.033%) (2011) Annual Coal Production (2012) 0.04 33.99 34.03 20 (0.43%) Source: EIA (2014) Figure 29-1 shows the distribution of lignite and hard coalfields in Romania. The coal deposits are grouped into four zones: Zone I, mainly located in the Southern Carpathian Mountains, includes all the high-grade coal such as anthracite, pit coal (higher ranking than brown coal – bituminous and sub-bituminous), and brown coal (lignite) from the Petrosani, Anina and Tebea-Brad basins. Zone II, located within the Pre-Carpathian creep, between the Olt and Valea Buzaului rivers, includes the lignite deposits of Campulung, Sotanga, Filipestii de Padure, and Ceptura. The coal basins of the Eastern Carpathian are also included within this zone: Baraolt-Virghis (lignite) and Comanesti-Bacau (brown coal). More than 90 percent of Romanian coal reserves are located within Zone II, namely in the mining basins of the Oltenia Region.
    [Show full text]
  • When Abortion Is Banned the Politics of Reproduction in Ceaucescu's
    THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H : When Abortion is Banned: TITLE The Politics of Reproduction in Ceausescu's Romania, and After AUTHOR: Gail Kligman CONTRACTOR : University of California, Berkeley PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Gail Kligman COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 805-1 4 DATE : May 26, 199 2 The work leading to this report was supported by contract funds provided by the National Council for Soviet an d East European Research . The analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those of the author. COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded by Council Contract . The Council and the U.S. Government have the right to duplicate written reports and other materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within the Council and U.S. Government for their own use , and to draw upon such reports and materials for their own studies ; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, or make such reports and materials available, outside the Council or U .S. Government without the written consent of the authors, except as may be required under the provisions of the Freedom o f Information Act 5 U.S. C. 552, or other applicable law. Table of Contents Executive Summary i I . Gender Equality, "Homogenization" and the New Socialist Person 3 II . Political Demography 8 A. The Pronatalist Policies 8 B. Policing the Body 1 8 III . The Politics of Reproduction in Post-Ceausescu Romania 29 A. Liberating Bodies : Abortion, AIDS, International Adoption 32 B. Protecting Citizens' Rights 42 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Anuarul Institutului De Cercetări Socio-Umane „C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor” “C.S
    ACADEMIA ROMÂNĂ ANUARUL INSTITUTULUI DE CERCETĂRI SOCIO-UMANE „C.S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” “C.S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STUDIES AND HUMANITIES YEARBOOK XVIII/2017 FOUNDING EDITOR: EDITORIAL BOARD: Vladimir OSIAC (University of Craiova, Acad. Dan BERINDEI (Romanian Academy, Romania) Romania); Acad. Dinu C. GIURESCU (Romanian Academy, EDITOR IN CHIEF: Romania); Cezar Gabriel AVRAM (C.S. Nicolăescu- Acad. Victor SPINEI (Romanian Academy, Plopşor Institute for Research in Social Studies Romania); and Humanities, Craiova, Romania) Nicolae PANEA (University of Craiova, DEPUTY EDITOR IN CHIEF: Romania); Mihaela BĂRBIERU (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Lucian DINDIRICĂ (The Alexandru and Aristia Institute for Research in Social Studies and Aman County Library, Romania); Humanities, Craiova, Romania) Simona LAZĂR (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Institute for Research in Social Studies and INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD: Humanities, Craiova, Romania); Patrick CHARLOT (University of Bourgogne, Nicolae MIHAI (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor France); Institute for Research in Social Studies and Shpakovskaya Marina ANATOLIEVNA Humanities, Craiova, Romania); (People’s Friendship University of Russia); Ion MILITARU (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Karina Paulina MARCZUK (University of Institute for Research in Social Studies and Warsaw, Poland); Humanities, Craiova, Romania); Teodora KALEYNSKA (Sf. Cyril and Sf. Şerban PĂTRAŞCU (C.S. Nicolăescu-Plopşor Methodius University of VelikoTurnovo, Institute for Research in Social Studies and Bulgaria); Humanities, Craiova, Romania); Anatol PETRENCU (Moldova State University, Roxana RADU (University of Craiova, Romania) Chişinău, Moldova); Virgiliu BÎRLĂDEANU (Institute of Social ROMANIAN ACADEMY PUBLISHING History, Chişinău, Moldova) HOUSE EDITORS: Mihaela IAMANDEI Monica STANCIU ACADEMIA ROMÂNĂ ANUARUL INSTITUTULUI DE CERCETĂRI SOCIO-UMANE „C. S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” “C.S. NICOLĂESCU-PLOPŞOR” INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STUDIES AND HUMANITIES YEARBOOK XVIII/2017 EDITURA ACADEMIEI ROMÂNE Bucharest, 2017 Editura Academiei Române, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Importance of Agriculture Sector in Romanian Economy
    Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development Vol. 16, Issue 1, 2016 PRINT ISSN 2284-7995, E-ISSN 2285-3952 ANALYSIS OF THE IMPORTANCE OF AGRICULTURE SECTOR IN ROMANIAN ECONOMY Camelia MĂNESCU, Ada-Flavia CRISTINA, Oana SICOE-MURG, Adrian GĂVRUȚA, Teodor MATEOC, Attila TOTH, Nicoleta MATEOC-SÎRB Banat's University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine „King Michael I of Romania” from Timişoara, Department of Management and Rural Development, 119, Calea Aradului, Timisoara, 300645, Romania, Emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Agriculture has been and remains the support of the human existence, which is an important pillar of the Romanian rural economy. This paper proposes an analysis of the main factors involved in the development of the agriculture in Romania: the share of agriculture in GDP, the land use, labor force in agriculture, farming and the production of agriculture in Romania. The used research methodology was based on analysis and synthesis of the information on the economic and social aspects of the development of the agriculture. In conclusion, the authors of this paper wanted to emphasize the necessity of the agriculture in ensuring the food security of the population, highlighting the need of strengthening the exploitation farms, of upgrading the technology and the overall improvement of the farmers work. Key words: agriculture, evolution, farms, production, Romania INTRODUCTION supply chain and agriculture are major factors for ensuring the food security of the Agriculture has been and remains of great population, at a macroeconomic and importance at the global and the European microeconomic level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Impact of Mine Closure in the Jiu Valley
    E3S Web of Conferences 239, 00004 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123900004 ICREN 2020 The social impact of mine closure in the Jiu Valley Izabella Kovacs*, Sorin Simion, Alin Irimia, Ligia Ioana Tuhuţ , and Gheorghe Daniel Florea National Institute for Research and Development in Mine Safety and Protection to Explosion – INSEMEX Petrosani, 32-34 G-ral Vasile Milea Street, Petrosani 332047, Romania Abstract. The impact of transition periods is experienced by the local population and economy as a result of mining activities closure and dismissal of a large number of workers followed by diversification of employment and career reorientation opportunities. The aim of the paper is to highlight the impact generated by closure of mining operations on local society and economy as well as identifying opportunities for harmonious development of communities in the Jiu Valley. Following the assessment of the social impact of mining activities closure, we found a rising tendency of unemployment rate among the middle-aged population that did not benefit from vocational retraining and the growing tendency of young people to leave the region for strictly economic reasons leading to widespread social aging. 1 Restructuring of mi ning activity in Romania and the Jiu Valley Jiu Valley is a micro-region in Hunedoara County, located between the Retezat and Parâng Mountains (fig.1). It consists of 3 cities: Petrila, Uricani and Aninoasa and 3 municipalities - Petroșani, Lupeni and Vulcan. Officially, the micro-region has no rural areas, because it has been incorporated into municipalities or cities, being considered urban. * Corresponding author: [email protected] © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Tour to Romania
    TOUR TO ROMANIA 11TH - 18TH October 2021 As we look to emerge from the Covid pandemic and travel returns to being a normal activity, we invite you to join us to explore Romania and its agricultural economy. Naturally, the final itinerary will be subject to confirmation prior to departure but be assured our programme will offer the traveller an enjoyable and diverse experience. Romania, famous as the land of the Carpathian Mountains, Dracula and wolves, is a young country having evolved from three separate states of Moldavia, Walachia and Transylvania who sought unification in the late 19th century. They fought the Germans during WWI and found themselves ruled by the Rus- sians at the end of WWII. The period under communism was one of abject poverty except for those in the ruling communist party who enjoyed a life of luxury. In 1989 and end of communist rule, the country was bankrupt with many people living in the countryside on a subsistence life- style, scratching a living from a small piece of land. Our tour will explore the evolution of the agricultural economy to correct that imbalance. The farming contrast can be stark with vast tracks of excellent farming land now owned by international corporations, who are able to make the necessary investment to modernise and transform agriculture. Land that was once part of state owned farms has been returned to the original owners. While some have elected to farm many have sold off the land to investors. There is growing quality in the farming in Romania underpinned by the benefits of European subsidies.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Unification Dissatisfaction
    Post-Unification Dissatisfaction Or: Why Are So Many East Germans Unhappy with the New Political System? revised version, April 1998 by Helmut Wiesenthal I Introduction Among the people of former communist countries, the East Germans appear extremely privileged. Through its unification with the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) the implementation of a pluralist democratic system and the market economy was smooth and safeguarded in many ways. First, East Germany benefits from the FRG‟s well-proven institutional system that immediately took effect during the second half of 1990. The citizens of the former German Democratic Republic (GDR) did not have to create a complete system of legal institutions, administrative agencies and representational bodies of their own. The framework of market economy, the organisations of territorial administration and local self-government, civil and commercial law, penal and public law, the social security system, antitrust and collective bargaining law, as well as the instruments of labor administration and industrial policy--none of these had to be invented in East Germany. Second, one need only recall the extraordinary advantage of large financial transfers without any obligation of repayment. Annual net transfers in the order of 160 billion marks have effected a rapid improvement of the public infrastructure, as do they back up the social insurance system. Thanks to massive financial aid, the impact of the transition crisis that burdens peoples of all other post-socialist countries is significantly reduced in East Germany. Third, being subjected to the political system--and the political elite--of West Germany, East Germany‟s process of transition is obviously the least likely to be endangered by the uncertainties and exigencies of a premature party and governance system, inconsistent concepts of reform, the bundle of socialist legacies of values and habits, or insufficient financial resources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Miner Industry from Jiu Valley – Environmental and Social Influences
    Annals of the „Constantin Brâncuşi” University of Târgu Jiu, Economy Series, Special Issue/2014- Information society and sustainable development THE MINER INDUSTRY FROM JIU VALLEY – ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL INFLUENCES PROF.EC.DRD. BĂDĂU ADRIAN-BOGDAN LICEUL TEHNOLOGIC “RETEZAT” URICANI, e-mail:[email protected] Rezumat Situated in the middle of the MERIDIONAL CARPATHIENS, the DEPRESSION OF JIU VALLEY represents the main pitcoal basin of Romania. In the last century, the extraction activity had a major influence on the developement of the region.The influences and the effects of the miner industry can be classified in two big groups: positive effects which means the acceleration of the economical developement, of the means of communication and the increase of the population and negative effects being the main source of pollution of the region. Cuvinte cheie: mining, economy, pollution, heaps of debris Clasificare JEL : M40, M41 1. Introduction and context study The coal deposits of the Jiu Valley Coal Basin were discovered for the first time by chance in the 18th century and the first mining works took place during the middle of the 19th century in VULCAN and PETRILA areas. Nowadays, the Jiu Valley Coal Basin distinguishes itself for the beauty of its landscapes, which is combined in great harmony with the richness of the subsoil. The pit coal resources have brought this area into prominence and have turned it out into one of the most important industrial centre in Romania. During the socialist period, Jiu Valley was considered one of the most flourishing regions in Romania. Jiu Valley micro-region has lost its statute of the economically developed area as a result of shutting down the mining infrastructure and of the mono-industrialization (the mining industry being orientated mainly towards mining), being considered nowadays as a disadvantaged area.
    [Show full text]