DOCSLIB.ORG

Belasco Fall 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Belasco Fall 2010 size matters Notes on the Triumph of Feminist Art by daniel belasco Hannah Wilke, “Venus Pareve,” 1982–84 he jewish museum has focused its collection list goes on and on. And there are the notable Israelis Michal of contemporary art since the 1980s on works with Heiman, Hila Lulu Lin, Sigalit Landau, Nurit David, Deganit strong themes of social consciousness: race, anti- Berest, among others. It’s not surprising that such a large col- Semitism, assimilation, identity, sexuality, and fam- lection of feminist artworks would live at The Jewish Museum, ily. Within the collection, there is a strong grouping since so many of the pioneers of feminist art, theory and activism of well over 100 works that address critically the situation of in the U.S. and abroad have been Jewish. Twomen in Judaism and Jewish culture and history. Their cre- Though some of these treasures have been in its collection ators occupy a veritable canon of American Jewish feminist art: for decades, Shifting the Gaze: Painting and Feminism is the first Eleanor Antin, Martha Rosler, Hannah Wilke, Nancy Spero, exhibition at The Jewish Museum to address directly the influ- Joyce Kozloff, Miriam Schapiro, Eva Hesse, Helène Aylon, ence of feminism on visual art, and the influence of Jewish culture Deborah Kass, Nan Goldin, Mierle Laderman Ukeles; the on both. The show consists of 33 works, 23 of which are in the 24 LILITH • Fall 2010 Dana Schutz, “Devourer,” 2004 www.Lilith.org • LILITH 25 collection of The Jewish Museum, seven of them acquired in the the success of the feminist interventions into art since the 1960s. The last three years. What was behind the choices for the exhibition? show is, in my mind, an expression of the triumph of feminist art. First, I selected pieces with maximum visual impact, includ- Over the decades it has successfully brought the revolution home, ing large-scale pieces. Size matters. It is important to show the effecting its transformation not only in the realm of new media and ambition and passion of the artists in the size of their works, and performance art, but in the very center of Western art: oil painting. the forcefulness by which they act upon the viewer. I wanted Now that we are in the post-postmodernist moment which an abstract Judy Chicago painting (see p. 29) that, at eight has seen a revival of interest in painting and abstraction, we feet square, would knock people’s socks off, even as the blurred can see that in fact it was feminism that breathed life back into grid rendered with glossy sprays of acrylic paint suggests intro- painting when it was declared dead in the 1970s. Indeed, there spection. The show’s large works by Ida Applebroog, Miriam is an inherent tension in feminism between the need to establish Schapiro, Nancy Spero, Melissa Meyer, Deborah Kass, and Rosalyn Drexler show feminist art as a muscular, assertive visual aesthetic, even when the media include textiles and collage. Most of the works in Shifting the Gaze are not easily digestible. Many are either fully abstract, or take familiar symbols and materials and subject them to an aesthetic process that moves them several degrees away from their familiar settings in daily life or consciousness. The works may be more familiar because they are paintings, and painting is the conventional medium of Art. But the overall effect is to transmit visual, non-verbal information to the viewer. The works in this show play on our emotions. They make our hearts race, or slow them down. Make our eyes dilate, or our blood boil. Or maybe send us running out the door. More often than not, the works are attacking or critiquing art itself. And there has been a great body of thought that the true feminist revolu- tion must entail the invention, proliferation, and mainstreaming of entirely new feminist aes- thetic forms and social structures. This includes Nancy Spero, “Masha Bruskina,” 1995 the elevations of “women’s art” (needlework, collage, ceramics) to equal status with painting and sculpture, strong women-centered institutions, and the need for women the development of groups and institutions to support profes- to go forth and reform the man-centered institutions. Like the sionalization, historical research to inspire new woman-centered feminist revolution in Judaism itself, this exhibition attempts to genealogies of art, and the dismantling of the so-called “male acknowledge both trajectories, showcasing artists who have built gaze” that rendered woman as sexual object, not thinking subject. strong women-centered practices and also point out the way that In fact it was feminism that breathed life back into painting when it was declared dead in the 1970s. For feminist artists to pick up the brush and confront the empty feminist aesthetics have affected the artistic mainstream. canvas — especially in the 1970s, when painting was declared dead by It was essential to include men in the show. Men had a per- most of the leading (male) critics and artists, rejecting it as bourgeois sonal stake in the rejection of the macho myth and masculine and commodified — was itself a great act of violation, of going against aggression. Shifting the Gaze is not the first feminist-oriented the grain and maintaining the personal struggle to create meaning exhibition to include men, but it certainly is the first in a Jewish with the stubborn method of applying paint to canvas. As one artist context, especially important because of the feminist tendency told me, in painting, nothing is hidden, everything is revealed, and to assail the patriarchal roots and liturgy of Judaism and the the medium is entirely unforgiving. I find this a heroic act, the simple traditional Jewish social structure. decision to make meaning out of blankness. Shifting the Gaze, by Painters Leon Golub, Robert Kushner, and Cary Leibowitz highlighting painting, especially large-scale painting, aims to affirm are not feminists per se: they did not join any groups, or sub- 26 LILITH • Fall 2010 scribe to any theories. They were fellow-travelers in the struggle against militarism and patriarchy. And they found feminism to be a fertile, vital source of ideas and new forms they could adapt to their own ends to contin- ue their own struggles against stereotypical masculinity. I felt that for an exhibition to argue about the “triumph” of feminism in art, to only present works by women would undermine the point by showing its effect on half the art world. But to include men, even just three, shows the wider influence of feminist ideas, and their effect on the work of the other half as well. Feminism and the lens of gender have for me been the most tempting, and effective, intellectual means to evaluate the relative merit and value of cultural produc- tion. Feminism’s ethical standards, risk taking, and uto- pian visions all hold great appeal to me, and, feminists are my personal heroes. My moral compass is set with feminism as true north, guiding me through my aca- demic work as an art historian and my personal life as a man, as a husband, as a father. I know I’m not the only Lee Lozano, “Untitled,” c. 1962 man who feels this way, and I’m pleased that including ly mod- men in the show helps confirm feminism’s wider impact. e r n i s t Now about the Jewish aspects of this show. Part of the phase in the 1960s, the museum exhibited work by numerous Jewishness is geographic and social. This is admittedly, a New influential Jewish women artists, including Lee Krasner, Eva York-centric show. Though California was an important refuge Hesse, and Louise Nevelson, sometimes before they became for many East Coast women artists fleeing the machismo that had feminists, as in the case of Judy Chicago and Miriam Schapiro. infected the New York art scene, nearly all eventually returned to However, there was no theoretic structure to bring these artists New York by the late 1970s. Joyce Kozloff created a brilliant map together under the rubric of a Jewish feminist art. in 1996, on which she wrote the names of all the Jewish women The three realms — Jewish, feminist, and art — while coming artists, writers, and leaders she could think of on the streets of an together in pairs, gained momentum as a trio in the 1990s, and old New York map. Quite pointedly, the work becomes a picture achieved a stunning degree of institutionalization in the past 10 of a community, both real and imagined, of Jewish women artists years. In the last half decade, we have seen the establishment of dominating the New York landscape. And indeed, looking back the Elizabeth A. Sackler Center for Feminist Art at the Brooklyn on certain feminist efforts, the Jewish participation runs high Museum [Lilith’s cover story in Summer, 2007]. This hosts the among the founders of important feminist art groups, from the newly restored exemplar of 1970s collaborative feminist art, Judy Feminist Art Program in 1970 to the Heresies collective in 1975 Chicago’s The Dinner Party (1974 – 79). Around the same time, to Women’s Action Coalition in 1992 to Ridykeulous in 2006. the art historians Lisa E. Bloom and Gail Levin published major Another context is The Jewish Museum itself. During its decided- scholarly articles and books, including Bloom’s Jewish Identities in American Feminist Art. They argue, as Nancy Spero, “Victims, Holocaust,” 1968 Shifting the Gaze does also, that Jewish feminist artists’ very attitude and ethos — to heal the world using language and the rein- vention of form and daily life — is inherent to postmodern Jewish culture.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Subrosa Tactical Biopolitics
    14 Common Knowledge and Political Love subRosa . the body has been for women in capitalist society what the factory has been for male waged workers: the primary ground of their exploitation and resistance, as the female body has been appropriated by the state and men, and forced to function as a means for the reproduction and accumulation of labor. Thus the importance which the body in all its aspects—maternity, childbirth, sexuality—has acquired in feminist theory and women’s history has not been misplaced. silvia federici (2004, p. 16) Under capitalism, femininity and gender roles became a “labor” function, and women became a “labor class.”1 On one hand, women’s bodies and labor are revered and exploited as a “natural” resource, a biocommons or commonwealth that is fundamental to maintain- ing and continuing life: women are equated with “the lands,” “mother-earth,” or “the homelands.”2 On the other hand, women’s sexual and reproductive labor—motherhood, pregnancy, childbirth—is economically devalued and socially degraded. In the Biotech Century, women’s bodies have become fl esh labs and Pharma-commons: They are mined for eggs, embryonic tissues, and stem cells for use in medical, and therapeutic experiments, and are employed as gestational wombs in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Under such conditions, resistant feminist discourses of the “body” emerge as an explicitly biopolitical practice.3 subRosa is a cyberfeminist collective of cultural producers whose practice creates dis- course and experiential knowledge about the intersections of information and biotechnolo- gies in women’s lives, work, and bodies. Since the year 2000, subRosa has produced a variety of performances, participatory events, installations, publications, and Web sites as (cyber)feminist responses to key issues in bio- and digital technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Monster Roster: Existentialist Art in Postwar Chicago Receives First Major Exhibition, at University of Chicago’S Smart Museum of Art, February 11 – June 12, 2016
    Contact C.J. Lind | 773.702.0176 | [email protected] For Immediate Release “One of the most important Midwestern contributions to the development of American art” MONSTER ROSTER: EXISTENTIALIST ART IN POSTWAR CHICAGO RECEIVES FIRST MAJOR EXHIBITION, AT UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO’S SMART MUSEUM OF ART, FEBRUARY 11 – JUNE 12, 2016 Related programming highlights include film screenings, monthly Family Day activities, and a Monster Mash Up expert panel discussion (January 11, 2016) The Smart Museum of Art at the University of Chicago, 5550 S. Greenwood Avenue, will mount Monster Roster: Existentialist Art in Postwar Chicago, the first-ever major exhibition to examine the history and impact of the Monster Roster, a group of postwar artists that established the first unique Chicago style, February 11–June 12, 2016. The exhibition is curated by John Corbett and Jim Dempsey, independent curators and gallery owners; Jessica Moss, Smart Museum Curator of Contemporary Art; and Richard A. Born, Smart Museum Senior Curator. Monster Roster officially opens with a free public reception, Wednesday, February 10, 7–9pm featuring an in-gallery performance by the Josh Berman Trio. The Monster Roster was a fiercely independent group of mid-century artists, spearheaded by Leon Golub (1922–2004), which created deeply psychological works drawing on classical mythology, ancient art, and a shared persistence in depicting the figure during a period in which abstraction held sway in international art circles. “The Monster Roster represents the first group of artists in Chicago to assert its own style and approach—one not derived from anywhwere else—and is one of the most important Midwestern contributions to the development of American art,” said co-curator John Corbett.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering the Contemporary
    of formalist distance upon which modernists had relied for understanding the world. Critics increasingly pointed to a correspondence between the formal properties of 1960s art and the nature of the radically changing world that sur- rounded them. In fact formalism, the commitment to prior- itizing formal qualities of a work of art over its content, was being transformed in these years into a means of discovering content. Leo Steinberg described Rauschenberg’s work as “flat- bed painting,” one of the lasting critical metaphors invented 1 in response to the art of the immediate post-World War II Discovering the Contemporary period.5 The collisions across the surface of Rosenquist’s painting and the collection of materials on Rauschenberg’s surfaces were being viewed as models for a new form of realism, one that captured the relationships between people and things in the world outside the studio. The lesson that formal analysis could lead back into, rather than away from, content, often with very specific social significance, would be central to the creation and reception of late-twentieth- century art. 1.2 Roy Lichtenstein, Golf Ball, 1962. Oil on canvas, 32 32" (81.3 1.1 James Rosenquist, F-111, 1964–65. Oil on canvas with aluminum, 10 86' (3.04 26.21 m). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. 81.3 cm). Courtesy The Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. New Movements and New Metaphors Purchase Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Alex L. Hillman and Lillie P. Bliss Bequest (both by exchange). Acc. n.: 473.1996.a-w. Artists all over the world shared U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nancy Spero: Paper Mirror
    Paseo de la Reforma #51 +52(55) 4122-8200 Bosque de Chapultepec, 11580 México, D.F. Nancy Spero: Paper Mirror • The Museo Tamayo is presenting the first solo exhibition of Nancy Spero in Mexico. • The exhibition will comprise nearly 100 works, spanning the whole of Spero’s career. • Nancy Spero: Paper Mirror will be open to the public from October 6, 2018—February 17, 2019. • Considered as one of the firs feminist and activist artist, her work deals with the representation of women and their inequality in the art world. A celebrated figure of the feminist art movement in the United States, Nancy Spero (1926–2009) consistently addressed oppression, inequality, and women’s social roles through both her art practice and activism. Born in Cleveland, Ohio, Spero graduated from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago in 1949. Before settling with their three sons in New York in 1964, she and her husband, the painter Leon Golub (1922–2004), lived in Paris, where she created her first mature works, the Black Paintings (1959–65). For Spero, choices of material, form, mode, and subject were always political. After many years of working in oil on canvas, in 1966, she concluded that the language of painting was “too conventional, too establishment,” and decided that from then on she would work exclusively on paper. Her first cycle of work on paper, the War Series (1966–1969), was motivated by her outrage over American atrocities in Vietnam—gouache-and-ink paintings that express “the museotamayo.org Paseo de la Reforma #51 +52(55) 4122-8200 Bosque de Chapultepec, 11580 México, D.F.
    [Show full text]
  • August 4, 2017
    June 17 – August 4, 2017 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (New York—June 20, 2017) Michael Rosenfeld Gallery proudly presents The Time Is N♀w, a group exhibition fea- turing thirty-two artists whose work the gallery has con- sistently championed for three decades through the- matic group exhibitions as well as multiple solo shows. The exhibition, which takes its title from a protest sign captured by Bettmann on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan during the Women’s Libera- tion Parade in August 1971, is curated to complement and expand on Making Space: Women Artists & Postwar Abstractioncurrently on view at the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA, New York). The Time Is N♀w features artists who represent a variety of positions on the spec- trum from figural representation to abstraction, including: Magdale- na Abakanowicz, Ruth Asawa, Hannelore Baron, Mary Bauermeister, Lee Bontecou, Deborah Butterfield, Barbara Chase-Riboud, Elaine Photo by Bettmann - Getty Images - Getty Bettmann by Photo de Kooning, Jay DeFeo, Claire Falkenstein, Gertrude Greene, Nancy Women’s Liberation Parade on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan, August 1971. Grossman, Grace Hartigan, Lee Krasner, Yayoi Kusama, Lee Lozano, Al- ice Trumbull Mason, Joan Mitchell, Alice Neel, Louise Nevelson, Agnes Pelton, Florence Miller Pierce, Irene Rice Pereira, Anne Ryan, Betye Converge/Black. Treated as two different sculptures by the art histo- Saar, Kaye Sage, Janet Sobel, Nancy Spero, Dorothea Tanning, Lenore rian Peter Selz, The Albino (aka All That Rises Must Converge/Black) Tawney, Alma Thomas, Charmion von Wiegand, and Claire Zeisler. resists a singular reading and instead, opens itself up, quite literally, to multiple readings.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Tongues
    BOOK OF TONGUES Mignon Nixon An extensive piece of writing of serious philosophical intent The Museum of Contemporary Art in Barce- lona, I am told, intends to present an exhibi- tion of Nancy Spero’s work as a kind of book. Contemplating this prospect in London, I pay a visit to the British Museum to study its display of papyri from the Egyptian Book of the Dead. It is a pilgrimage I often make when reflecting on Spero’s art, which, through frequent allusions to literary artefacts, from Egyptian scrolls to medieval manuscripts, dramatizes the vanishing of cultural memory, pointing insistently, through the invocation of past cultures, to art’s “lost resources in myth.”1 Today, however, my thoughts are con- centrated on the word book. The Egyptian Book of the Dead, to which Spero’s art has often referred, does not resemble a book in the modern sense of the term, being neither a bound volume nor a definitive edition of a text, but a compendium of diverse writings, often conjoined with graphic motifs, copied onto papyrus, linen, leather, even onto the walls of tombs. As Barry Kemp, Professor of Egyptology at the University of Cambridge, writes in his helpful primer, How to Read the Egyptian Book of the Dead: “‘Book’ is an English translation of a word in ancient Egyp- tian that in fact refers to an extensive piece of writing of serious philosophical intent.”2 This, I consider, might be an apt description of Nancy Spero’s art. By this definition, her 1. Benjamin H.D. Buchloh: “Spero’s Other Traditions”, work is indeed a book.
    [Show full text]
  • ALLEGORIES of MODERNISM: CONTEMPORARY DRAWING February 16 - May 5, 1992
    The Museum of Modern Art For Immediate Release January 1992 ALLEGORIES OF MODERNISM: CONTEMPORARY DRAWING February 16 - May 5, 1992 ALLEGORIES OF MODERNISM: CONTEMPORARY DRAWING, opening at The Museum of Modern Art on February 16, 1992, provocatively explores developments in drawing since the mid-1970s. Following DRAWING NOW, the Museum's pioneering exhibition of 1976 that documented the emergence of drawing as a major and independent means of expression, ALLEGORIES OF MODERNISM records the important and multifaceted role of drawing in art today. Organized by Bernice Rose, senior curator in the Museum's Department of Drawings, the exhibition includes some 200 works by more than forty artists from the United States and Europe. It is installed in the Rene d'Harnoncourt Galleries on the Museum's lower level, the third-floor Drawings Galleries, the Garden Hall and Projects Gallery, and throughout several of the Museum's "public" spaces. The exhibition is made possible by a generous grant from Mr. and Mrs. Ronald S. Lauder. Additional support has been provided by The International Council of The Museum of Modern Art, The Bohen Foundation, The Tobin Foundation, and The Solow Foundation. Many artists today are engaged in questioning the nature and the limits of drawing. Using a wide and often adventurous array of materials and techniques, they ask not only what drawing is, but what differentiates drawing from other activities. Indeed, as Bernice Rose writes in the publication -more- 11 West 53 Street, New York, N.Y. 10019-5498 Tel: 212-708-9400 Cable; MODERNART Telex: 62370 MODART 2 accompanying the exhibition, "the formal purity of drawing is not an issue, nor is it of much concern to artists Although increasingly an independent mode, [drawing] has also become inextricably mixed with other mediums, with painting and painterly devices, with color, and with paint itself.
    [Show full text]
  • “My Personal Is Not Political?” a Dialogue on Art, Feminism and Pedagogy
    Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies Vol. 5, No. 2, July 2009 “My Personal Is Not Political?” A Dialogue on Art, Feminism and Pedagogy Irina Aristarkhova and Faith Wilding This is a dialogue between two scholars who discuss art, feminism, and pedagogy. While Irina Aristarkhova proposes “active distancing” and “strategic withdrawal of personal politics” as two performative strategies to deal with various stereotypes of women's art among students, Faith Wilding responds with an overview of art school’s curricular within a wider context of Feminist Art Movement and the radical questioning of art and pedagogy that the movement represents Using a concrete situation of teaching a women’s art class within an art school environment, this dialogue between Faith Wilding and Irina Aristakhova analyzes the challenges that such teaching represents within a wider cultural and historical context of women, art, and feminist performance pedagogy. Faith Wilding has been a prominent figure in the feminist art movement from the early 1970s, as a member of the California Arts Institute’s Feminist Art Program, Womanhouse, and in the recent decade, a member of the SubRosa, a cyberfeminist art collective. Irina Aristarkhova, is coming from a different history to this conversation: generationally, politically and theoretically, she faces her position as being an outsider to these mostly North American and, to a lesser extent, Western European developments. The authors see their on-going dialogue of different experiences and ideas within feminism(s) as an opportunity to share strategies and knowledges towards a common goal of sustaining heterogeneity in a pedagogical setting. First, this conversation focuses on the performance of feminist pedagogy in relation to women’s art.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Vision: Woman As Image and Imagemaker
    double vision WOMAN AS IMAGE AND IMAGEMAKER Everywhere in the modern world there is neglect, the need to be recognized, which is not satisfied. Art is a way of recognizing oneself, which is why it will always be modern. -------------- Louise Bourgeois HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES The Davis Gallery at Houghton House Sarai Sherman (American, 1922-) Pas de Deux Electrique, 1950-55 Oil on canvas Double Vision: Women’s Studies directly through the classes of its Woman as Image and Imagemaker art history faculty members. In honor of the fortieth anniversary of Women’s The Collection of Hobart and William Smith Colleges Studies at Hobart and William Smith Colleges, contains many works by women artists, only a few this exhibition shows a selection of artworks by of which are included in this exhibition. The earliest women depicting women from The Collections of the work in our collection by a woman is an 1896 Colleges. The selection of works played off the title etching, You Bleed from Many Wounds, O People, Double Vision: the vision of the women artists and the by Käthe Kollwitz (a gift of Elena Ciletti, Professor of vision of the women they depicted. This conjunction Art History). The latest work in the collection as of this of women artists and depicted women continues date is a 2012 woodcut, Glacial Moment, by Karen through the subtitle: woman as image (woman Kunc (a presentation of the Rochester Print Club). depicted as subject) and woman as imagemaker And we must also remember that often “anonymous (woman as artist). Ranging from a work by Mary was a woman.” Cassatt from the early twentieth century to one by Kara Walker from the early twenty-first century, we I want to take this opportunity to dedicate this see depictions of mothers and children, mythological exhibition and its catalog to the many women and figures, political criticism, abstract figures, and men who have fostered art and feminism for over portraits, ranging in styles from Impressionism to forty years at Hobart and William Smith Colleges New Realism and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Nancy Spero Sky Goddess
    kaufmann repetto Nancy Spero Sky Goddess kaufmann repetto is honored to present Sky Goddess, an exhibition of works by American artist and activist, Nancy Spero (1926-2009). Through the use of historical text and imagery, Nancy Spero created a lexicon in which women are the protagonists in the origin and development of human race and culture. Her work counters the patriarchal lens through which our understanding of civilization has been constructed and positions itself, instead, in a world where female reality is human reality. While the universal has been projected as male oriented and dominated, Nancy Spero’s works address a remembrance of history that contradicts this singularized scope through which human beings have been represented in society. In the mid-1960’s - 70’s, Spero began to work with painting and later collage and printing techniques on paper, as in her politically charged bodies of work, The War Series (1966-70), Artaud Paintings (1969-72) and Codex Artaud (1971-73), in lieu of the more conventionally accepted and affirmative stretched and framed canvas. Her decision to utilize paper, often presented in a scroll-like manner, mimicking the formal capacities of the friezes and frescos she experienced while living in Italy from 1956-1957, destabilized the value assignations dedicated to these traditional means of presentation. Spero simultaneously considered the use of paper as an anti- establishment act of defiance and also embraced it for its fragility and disposable nature which transformed the works into ephemeral monuments. The orientation of the paper scrolls allowed for Spero to selectively activate and vacate ground as a means to create rhythms that directed viewers’ attention to the blank spaces or blind spots in the retelling of history.
    [Show full text]
  • PEGGY PHELAN NOTES on FEMINISMS PEGGY PHELAN Bodies to Come
    NOTES ON FEMINISMS 3 PEGGY PHELAN NOTES ON FEMINISMS PEGGY PHELAN Bodies to Come Feminism today often feels bipolar. Focusing only on recent actions and reactions in the United States, it seems clear that, on the one hand, activist feminist movements such as MeToo and Time’s Up have helped spark a revolution in awareness about sexual harassment, sexual assault, and the larger forces of misogyny that have been long central to the consolidation of white patriarchal power. During Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony about his alleged sexual assault of her in high school did not cancel his confirmation, but her testimony, broadcast live and in full, helped ignite more probing analyses of the ways in which (mainly white) men regulate and fail to regulate them- selves with women in everyday life. Coming after Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (apparent) loss to Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election and Chanel Miller’s important publication of her “victim impact statement” in the Brock Turner rape trial, Blasey Ford’s testimony tapped dormant rage about the ways in which (mainly white) men often feel entitled to the bodies of women. While some of this entitlement has been scrutinized in recent years, its connection to the aggressive rollback of women’s reproductive rights has received little attention. The same logic that leads men to think they can impose their sexual desires on women leads them to decide when and how women can reproduce. Finally, it should not be forgotten that even while MeToo and Time’s Up and other feminist activist groups have been effective in stopping some appalling behavior, the United States nonetheless elected a president who boasted to Billy Bush, on tape, that he “can do anything” he’d like with women’s bodies: Trump: I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Issue (PDF)
    Vol. 2 No. 2 wfimaqartr f l / l I l U X l U l I Winter 1977-78 ‘ARTISTS IN RESIDENCE': The First Five Years Five years ago, the A.I.R. feminist co-op gallery opened its doors, determined to make its own, individual mark on the art world. The first co-op organized out of the women artists' movement, it continues to set high standards of service and commitment to women's art by Corinne Robins page 4 EXORCISM, PROTEST, REBIRTH: Modes ot Feminist Expression in France Part I: French Women Artists Today by Gloria Feman Orenstein.............................................................page 8 SERAPHINE DE SENLIS With no formal art training, she embarked on a new vocation as visionary painter. Labelled mentally ill in her own time, she is finally receiving recognition in France for her awakening of 'female creativity' by Charlotte Calmis ..................................................................... p a g e 12 A.I.R.'S FIFTH ANNIVERSARY 1 ^ ^ INTERVIEW WITH JOAN SEMMEL W omanart interviews the controversial contemporary artist and author, curator of the recent "Contemporary Women: Consciousness and Content" at the Brooklyn Museum by Ellen L u b e ll.................................................................................page 14 TOWARD A NEW HUMANISM: Conversations with Women Artists Interviews with a cross-section of artists reveal their opinions on current questions and problems, and how these indicate movement toward a continuum of human values by Katherine Hoffman ................................................................... pa g e 22 GALLERY REVIEWS ..........................................................................page 30 WOMAN* ART»WORLD News items of interest ................................................................... page 42 FRENCH WOMEN ARTISTS REPORTS Lectures and panel discussions accompany "Women Artists: 1550-1950" and "Contemporary Women" at the Brooklyn Museum; Women Artists in H o lla n d ...............................................................page 43 Cover: A.I.R.
    [Show full text]