The Rookery Building and Chicago-Kent

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Rookery Building and Chicago-Kent Chicago-Kent College of Law Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law 125th Anniversary Materials 125th Anniversary 2-23-2013 The Rookery Building and Chicago-Kent A. Dan Tarlock Chicago-Kent College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/docs_125 Part of the Legal Commons, Legal Education Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Tarlock, A. Dan, "The Rookery Building and Chicago-Kent" (2013). 125th Anniversary Materials. 12. https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/docs_125/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the 125th Anniversary at Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in 125th Anniversary Materials by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 14 Then & Now: Stories of Law and Progress Rookery Building, Historic American Buildings Survey, Library of Congress. THE ROOKERY BUILDING AND CHICAGO-KENT A. Dan Tarlock hicago-Kent traces its ori- sustain Chicago as a world city, thus gin to the incorporation of making it an attractive and exciting the Chicago College of Law in place to practice law to the benefit C1888. Chicago-Kent’s founding coin- of all law schools in Chicago in- cided with the opening of the Rook- cluding Chicago-Kent. ery Building designed by the preem- The Rookery is now a classic ex- inent architectural firm of Burnham ample of the first school of Chica- and Root. There is a direct connec- go architecture which helped shape tion between the now iconic Rook- modern Chicago and continues to ery Building, located at Adams and make Chicago a special place, de- LaSalle, and the law school building spite decades of desecration of this further west on Adams. There is also rich architectural heritage. The Great a more indirect but interesting con- Fire of 1871 destroyed the Loop and nection between the first and second the newly developed residential ar- schools of Chicago architecture and eas to the north. It did, however, nar- Daniel Burnham’s vision of the mod- rowly miss the lumber yard which ern city. Architects, but especially occupied the site of the current law Daniel Burnham, helped make and school. Architects were immediately A. Dan Tarlock 15 attracted to Chicago because of the partially load-bearing, but the inte- opportunities to rebuild the city. rior used the state-of-the-art steel The skyscraper was perfected here, frame, developed by William Jenny, and this technological innovation, to permit it to become the tallest along with the telephone and Otis building in Chicago. The building Elevator, created the modern office is a mix of early modernist and ret- city by separating industrial pro- rospective styles. The walls of large duction from its administration. By windows allowed maximum use of 1888, Chicago, along with Buenos light because of the dimness of the Aires and Sao Paulo, was emerging 20 watt bulbs powered by Common- as a major example of a modern city wealth Edison’s first loop generating unconstrained by any significant ur- station across the street. The exterior ban past. The city had grown from building is also an example of Chi- about 100,000 persons when Lin- cago Romanesque. This style, whose coln was nominated for President, distinctive feature was the arch, was a few blocks from the current law based on pre-Gothic Romanesque school, to one million inhabitants architecture in southern France. Ini- and counting. tially adopted by Frank Richardson Chicago had surpassed Philadel- in Boston, the great Louis Sullivan phia and became America’s second brought it to Chicago. The Auditorium city. Chicago’s location as a rail and Theater, which opened in 1889, is water hub enabled it to become the the best surviving example. processing center for the agricultural After the elite lost interest in bounty of the Midwest and Great “modern architecture,” innovation Plains as well as the distribution cen- languished in Chicago until the ter for this region. For a brief period post–World War II modernist school of time, wealthy Chicagoans used emerged. Until the 1980s, Post-War their new wealth and power to pa- Chicago architecture was a monu- tronize a progressive group of archi- ment to Mies van der Rohe. Fleeing tects to build modern, forward-look- Nazi Germany, he ultimately settled ing cathedrals of commerce. in Chicago, headed IIT’s then De- A group of Chicago architects, partment of Architecture, designed led by Dankmar Adler, Louis Sul- its landmark campus, and more livan, John Root, Daniel Burnham generally helped make the German and later Frank Lloyd Wright, de- Bauhaus the dominant form of post– veloped a distinctive style of archi- World War II Chicago architecture. tecture geared to the technological The law school’s current building, innovations that were changing the which opened in 1992, is a synthesis nature of business. The Rookery is of the two great schools of Chica- a perfect example. The walls were go architecture. Its scale and facade 16 Then & Now: Stories of Law and Progress “Rookery Building, exterior,” photo from 1891, Images of America Collection, Frances Loeb Library. recall the post-fire Prairie School, the Encyclopedia of Chicago explains, especially the Rookery Building. “believed that the sometimes frantic However, the incorporation of an quest for ‘American-ness’—the ob- arch into early designs was rejected session with New World originality as disproportionate to the building. and horror of all things Europe- Not only is it about the same height, an—was itself a kind of insecurity, it was designed by Holabird and and that maturity would consist in Root, the successor firm to Burnham an acknowledgment that America and Root. The relatively austere stone was not culturally isolated from the facade, rather than a pure steel and rest of the world. Burnham and his glass frame characteristic of Mies’s associates saw the United States as main campus buildings, echoes the a rightful heir to the traditions of Rookery in both style and underly- Western culture.” ing philosophy. And, like the law, it Daniel Burnham’s larger legacy both respects the past and looks to for Chicago and its vibrant legal the future. Burnham rejected the ar- community is twofold. First, Prairie gument of Louis Sullivan and Frank School architecture both symbolized Lloyd Wright that America needed Chicago’s emergence as a world city a distinctive style of architecture. in the late nineteenth and early twen- Rather, “Burnham and his allies,” as tieth century by allowing it to drain A. Dan Tarlock 17 the surrounding region of both re- dard housing, rampant corruption, sources and talent, legal and other- and juvenile and gang violence have wise. This legacy along with Burn- provided endless opportunities for ham’s partially realized 1909 plan lawyers and future lawyers trying to also helped Chicago to evolve into a obtain justice for individuals caught major financial center, after its origi- in the net of poverty, corruption, nal industrial base of Chicago eroded brutality, and discrimination equally after World War II. The concentra- characteristic of Chicago, including tion of law firms to serve Chicago’s a young Columbia University grad- economy provided employment for uate (and Chicago-Kent commence- thousands of lawyers. ment speaker), Barack Obama. ◆ The second legacy of Burnham’s plan is much darker but also benefit- ted Chicago lawyers. The much hailed Sources and Further Reading ■ William Cronon, Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago plan envisioned Chicago as a great and the Great West (1987). city in the mold of Paris or Imperial ■ Encyclopedia of Chicago, www.encyclopedia.chi- cagohistory.org. Vienna. But the plan primarily con- ■ George A. Larson, Jay Pridmore & Hedrich centrated on a magnificent core and Blessing, Chicago Architecture and Design (2005). ■ Donald L. Miller, City of the Century: The Epic of lakefront for the wealthy. The un- Chicago and the Making of America (1997). ruly, poor, polluted, and dangerous ■ Carl Smith, The Plan of Chicago: Daniel Burnham rest of the city, home to the waves of and the Remaking of the American City (2006). immigrants from around the world and migrants from other parts of the country, was depicted only by end- A. Dan Tarlock received his under- graduate and law degrees from Stanford less low rise, uniform blocks. In other University. He joined the Chicago-Kent words, the city that actually existed faculty in 1982 after teaching at the Uni- was largely ignored. It was left to versity of Kentucky and Indiana Uni- others to deal with what was in fact versity, Bloomington. Professor Tarlock happening on the streets of Chica- is one of the founders of the law school’s go. In the twentieth century, Chi- Program in Energy and Environmental Law. He has taught energy law, environ- cago’s continuing attempts to deal mental law, land use control, property with urban problems such as racial and water law and has published widely segregation, urban poverty, substan- in these fields..
Recommended publications
  • Early 'Urban America'
    CCAPA AICP Exam Presentation Planning History, Theory, and Other Stuff Donald J. Poland, PhD, AICP Senior VP & Managing Director, Urban Planning Goman+York Property Advisors, LLC www.gomanyork.com East Hartford, CT 06108 860-655-6897 [email protected] A Few Words of Advice • Repetitive study over key items is best. • Test yourself. • Know when to stop. • Learn how to think like the test writers (and APA). • Know the code of ethics. • Scout out the test location before hand. What is Planning? A Painless Intro to Planning Theory • Rational Method = comprehensive planning – Myerson and Banfield • Incremental (muddling through) = win little battles that hopefully add up to something – Charles Lindblom • Transactive = social development/constituency building • Advocacy = applying social justice – Sherry Arnstein’s Ladder of Public Participation – Paul Davidoff – advocacy planning American Planning before 1800 • European Traditions – New England, New Amsterdam, & the village tradition – Tidewater and the ‘Town Acts’ – The Carolinas/Georgia and the Renaissance Style – L’Enfant, Washington D.C., & Baroque Style (1791) • Planning was Architectural • Planning was plotting street layouts • There wasn’t much of it… The 1800’s and Planning Issues • The ‘frontier’ is more distant & less appealing • Massive immigration • Industrialization & Urbanization • Problems of the Industrial City – Poverty, pollution, overcrowding, disease, unrest • Planning comes to the rescue – NYC as epicenter – Central Park 1853 – 1857 (Olmsted & Vaux) – Tenement Laws Planning Prior to WWI • Public Awareness of the Problems – Jacob Riis • ‘How the Other Half Lives’ (1890) • Exposed the deplorable conditions of tenement house life in New York City – Upton Sinclair • ‘The Jungle’ (1905) – William Booth • The Salvation Army (1891) • Solutions – Zoning and the Public Health Movement – New Towns, Garden Cities, and Streetcar Suburbs – The City Beautiful and City Planning Public Health Movement • Cities as unhealthy places – ‘The Great Stink’, Cholera, Tuberculosis, Alcoholism….
    [Show full text]
  • VILLAGE WIDE ARCHITECTURAL + HISTORICAL SURVEY Final
    VILLAGE WIDE ARCHITECTURAL + HISTORICAL SURVEY Final Survey Report August 9, 2013 Village of River Forest Historic Preservation Commission CONTENTS INTRODUCTION P. 6 Survey Mission p. 6 Historic Preservation in River Forest p. 8 Survey Process p. 10 Evaluation Methodology p. 13 RIVER FOREST ARCHITECTURE P. 18 Architectural Styles p. 19 Vernacular Building Forms p. 34 HISTORIC CONTEXT P. 40 Nineteenth Century Residential Development p. 40 Twentieth Century Development: 1900 to 1940 p. 44 Twentieth Century Development: 1940 to 2000 p. 51 River Forest Commercial Development p. 52 Religious and Educational Buildings p. 57 Public Schools and Library p. 60 Campuses of Higher Education p. 61 Recreational Buildings and Parks p. 62 Significant Architects and Builders p. 64 Other Architects and Builders of Note p. 72 Buildings by Significant Architect and Builders p. 73 SURVEY FINDINGS P. 78 Significant Properties p. 79 Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 81 Non-Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 81 Potentially Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 81 Potentially Non-Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 81 Noteworthy Buildings Less than 50 Years Old p. 82 Districts p. 82 Recommendations p. 83 INVENTORY P. 94 Significant Properties p. 94 Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 97 Non-Contributing Properties to the National Register District p. 103 Potentially Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 104 Potentially Non-Contributing Properties to a National Register District p. 121 Notable Buildings Less than 50 Years Old p. 125 BIBLIOGRAPHY P. 128 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS RIVER FOREST HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION David Franek, Chair Laurel McMahon Paul Harding, FAIA Cindy Mastbrook Judy Deogracias David Raino-Ogden Tom Zurowski, AIA PROJECT COMMITTEE Laurel McMahon Tom Zurowski, AIA Michael Braiman, Assistant Village Administrator SURVEY TEAM Nicholas P.
    [Show full text]
  • Reciprocal Sites Membership Program
    2015–2016 Frank Lloyd Wright National Reciprocal Sites Membership Program The Frank Lloyd Wright National Reciprocal Sites Program includes 30 historic sites across the United States. FLWR on your membership card indicates that you enjoy the National Reciprocal sites benefit. Benefits vary from site to site. Please check websites listed in this brochure for detailed information on each site. ALABAMA ARIZONA CALIFORNIA FLORIDA 1 Rosenbaum House 2 Taliesin West 3 Hollyhock House 4 Florida Southern College 601 RIVERVIEW DRIVE 12621 N. FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT BLVD BARNSDALL PARK 750 FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT WAY FLORENCE, AL 35630 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261-4430 4800 HOLLYWOOD BLVD LAKELAND, FL 33801 256.718.5050 480.860.2700 LOS ANGELES, CA 90027 863.680.4597 ROSENBAUMHOUSE.COM FRANKLLOYDWRIGHT.ORG 323.644.6269 FLSOUTHERN.EDU/FLW WRIGHTINALABAMA.COM FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION BARNSDALL.ORG FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION TOUR HOURS: 9AM–4PM FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION TOUR HOURS: TOUR HOURS: BOOKSHOP HOURS: 8:30AM–6PM TOUR HOURS: THURS–SUN, 11AM–4PM OPEN ALL YEAR, EXCEPT OPEN ALL YEAR, EXCEPT TOUR TICKETS AVAILABLE AT THE THANKSGIVING, CHRISTMAS AND NEW Experience firsthand Frank Lloyd MAJOR HOLIDAYS. HOLLYHOCK HOUSE VISITOR’S CENTER YEAR’S DAY. 10AM–4PM Wright’s brilliant ability to integrate TUES–SAT, 10AM–4PM IN BARNSDALL PARK. VISITOR CENTER & GIFT SHOP HOURS: SUN, 1PM–4PM indoor and outdoor spaces at Taliesin Hollyhock House is Wright’s first 9:30AM–4:30PM West—Wright’s winter home, school The Rosenbaum House is the only Los Angeles project. Built between and studio from 1937-1959, located Discover the largest collection of Frank Lloyd Wright-designed 1919 and 1923, it represents his on 600 acres of dramatic desert.
    [Show full text]
  • 805 15Th STREET, NW "Make No Little Plans, They Have No Magic to Stir Men's Blood."
    805 15th STREET, NW "Make no little plans, they have no magic to stir men's blood." - Daniel H. Burnham THE GREATER 15TH STREET FINANCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT As the city’s population continued to increase during the late 19th century, the number of financial institutions grew correspondingly – primarily in and around the Department of Treasury at 15th Street & New York Avenue, NW. As business expanded, the size and number of the city’s fi- nancial institutions, especially the Trust companies, and their associated real estate businesses similarly grew. As a reflection of this growth and prosperity, the city’s financial institutions began to build highly visible and monumental headquarter buildings. Essentially simultaneous to the development of banks and office buildings at 14th and G Streets, the 15th Street corridor grew beyond its cluster of bank buildings next to the Trea- sury, ultimately inspiring a linear growth of banking-related enterprises up to and including McPherson Square, of which The Southern Building is a superior example. WORLD RENOWNED ARCHITECTURE Designed by renowned, Daniel H. Burnham (1846-1912), The Southern Building opened in 1910 initially leased to, and owned and occupied by two insurance companies: the First National Fire Insurance Company and the Commercial Fire Insurance Company. The impact Mr. Burnham had on urban planning and the American city is still felt today, more than 100 years after his death. Over the course of his illustrious career, Burnham pioneered some of the world’s first skyscrapers, inspired the City Beautiful Movement with his vision for the World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago, and created urban plans for numerous cities before urban planning even existed as a profession.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel H., Jr. & Hubert Burnham Papers Location: R&B Arch. Diary & Scrapbook Index Call Number: 1943.2 I. Daniel H
    DANIEL H., JR. & HUBERT BURNHAM PAPERS LOCATION: R&B ARCH. DIARY & SCRAPBOOK INDEX CALL NUMBER: 1943.2 I. DANIEL H. BURNHAM, JR., COLLECTION: DIARIES The Daniel H. Burnham, Jr., diaries consist of calendar entries describing his daily work and personal activities, beginning with Nov. 19, 1908 and ending Oct. 10, 1961. The earliest entries were written while employed by his father, Daniel H. Burnham, Sr., with the firm, D. H. Burnham and Company. The 1908-1909 diary records his year living and working in Houston, TX, supervising construction of the Scanlan Building. A newspaper clipping attached to the Nov. 19 date describes the building as the first big undertaking for Daniel Burnham, Jr. In the 1910 diary the daily entries concern his activities while working in the Chicago office of the firm. He works on several existing contracts: the Giertsen Warehouse, the South Park Commissioners Administration Building, the 39th Street Telephone [Tunnel Company?] Station, Orchestra Hall, the Rockwell warehouse, the David Meyer building and the Oliver Building in Pittsburgh. He travels to Houston for additional supervisory work on the Scanlan Building. On June 13 authorization is granted to plan the Scanlan Warehouse in Houston. Noted in the 1911 diary is his preparation of estimates for several potential projects. He also travels to cities to inspect buildings already under construction and works on the plans for the Columbus Monument Plaza and Union Station, Washington, D.C.; Rock Island Savings Bank, Rock Island, IL; Scanlan Warehouse, Houston, TX; Waldheim Building, Kansas City, MO; Second National Bank, Toledo, OH; several projects for the South Park Commissioners, Chicago; W.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank Lloyd Wright
    'SBOL-MPZE8SJHIU )JTUPSJD"NFSJDBO #VJMEJOHT4VSWFZ '$#PHL)PVTF $PNQJMFECZ.BSD3PDILJOE Frank Lloyd Wright Historic American Buildings Survey Sample: F. C. Bogk House Compiled by Marc Rochkind Frank Lloyd Wright: Historic American Buildings Survey, Sample Compiled by Marc Rochkind ©2012,2015 by Marc Rochkind. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be transmitted or reproduced in any form or by any means (including electronic) without permission in writing from the copyright holder. Copyright does not apply to HABS materials downloaded from the Library of Congress website, although it does apply to the arrangement and formatting of those materials in this book. For information about other works by Marc Rochkind, including books and apps based on Library of Congress materials, please go to basepath.com. Introduction The Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) was started in 1933 as one of the New Deal make-work programs, to employ jobless architects, draftspeople, and photographers. Its purpose is to document the nation’s architectural heritage, especially those buildings that are in danger of ruin or deliberate destruction. Today, the HABS is part of the National Park Service and its repository is in the Library of Congress, much of which is available online at loc.gov. Of the tens of thousands HABS buildings, I found 44 Frank Lloyd Wright designs that have been digitized. Each HABS survey includes photographs and/or drawings and/or a report. I’ve included here what the Library of Congress had–sometimes all three, sometimes two of the three, and sometimes just one. There might be a single photo or drawing, or, such as in the case of Florida Southern College (in volume two), over a hundred.
    [Show full text]
  • Thompson Center, Thompson Center Name of Multiple Property Listing N/A (Enter "N/A" If Property Is Not Part of a Multiple Property Listing)
    NPS Form 10900 OMB No. 10240018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name State of Illinois Center other names/site number James R. Thompson Center, Thompson Center Name of Multiple Property Listing N/A (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) 2. Location street & number 100 West Randolph Street not for publication city or town Chicago vicinity state Illinois county Cook zip code 60601 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D Signature of certifying official/Title: Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Date Illinois Department of Natural Resources - SHPO State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dialogue Restored Rooms Open at Robie House
    For Members of the Volume 45 : Issue 2 Summer – Fall 2018 Frank Lloyd Wright Trust Wright Angles: A DIALOGUE RESTORED ROOMS OPEN AT ROBIE HOUSE From the President & CEO In August the Trust completed phase 1 restoration of the Robie House interior, and visitors began touring the restored front entry hall, main stairway, billiard room and living room. Refreshed wall and ceiling plaster and vibrant original coloration have transformed the rooms, and the reinstallation of lighting and leaded glass windows illuminate the space with a balanced mixture of natural and incandescent light. With renewed excitement, we welcome guests from around the world to see Robie House restored to Wright’s 1910 vision. Unanimously recognized by European critics in 1930 as the precursor to international modernism, Robie House today is Photo: James Caulfield Photo: re-evaluated by contemporary audiences. A grant from the Getty The restored Robie House living room open for tours. Foundation has facilitated our preparation of a Robie House Conservation Management Plan that will establish guiding principles and policies for generations to come. A value-based assessment is part of this plan. I hope you will participate in the 2018 Board of Directors survey described on pages 10-11. John M. Rafkin, Chairman Join us on Tuesday, October 2, for the Trust’s 7th annual Robert Miller, Vice-Chair and Chair, Executive Committee Thinking into the Future: Robie House Series on Architecture, David Dunning, Treasurer Design and Ideas. This year’s speaker, Mark Sexton, will discuss Graham J. Rarity, Secretary Architect / Artist Collaborations, a hallmark of his distinguished Peter R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rookery Chicago Illinois
    VOLUME 25 NUMBER 1 JANUARY-MARCH 1995 OFFICE THE ROOKERY CHICAGO, ILLINOIS PROJECT TYPE An outstanding restoration of a historic, century-old, 12-story office building. The developer's strategy was to restore the 293,962-square-foot building's historic architectural interiors on the ground and mezzanine levels and to incorporate state-of-the-art HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning), electrical, elevator, security, and telecommunications systems into the upper floors of office space without losing the feeling of the old building. This project sets the standard for future commercial renovations and proves that the cost of expensive, high-quality restoration can be recovered in Class A rents. SPECIAL FEATURES Historic preservation Landmark office building Successful conversion of a vacant, deteriorated building into modern Class A office space DEVELOPER Baldwin Development Company 209 South LaSalle Street, Suite 400 Chicago, Illinois 60604 312-553-6100 OWNER Rookery Partners Limited Partnership 209 South LaSalle Street, Suite 400 Chicago, Illinois 60604 312-553-6100 RESTORATION ARCHITECT McClier Corporation 401 East Illinois, Suite 625 Chicago, Illinois 60611 312-836-7700 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Following one of the most extensive restorations of a historic office building ever undertaken, the 109-year-old Rookery Building, located in the heart of Chicago's financial district, has reclaimed its former splendor. With painstaking exactitude, Baldwin Development Company and its restoration architect have brought back elements of the Rookery's three eras—Daniel Burnham and John Wellborn Root's original 1886 design, Frank Lloyd Wright's 1905 modernization of the interior, and a 1931 remodeling by William Drummond—while at the same time renovating the office floors to compete with the most expensive, recently constructed office space inside Chicago's Loop.
    [Show full text]
  • The Woman's Building of the World's Columbian Exposition, Chicago, 1893
    The Invisible Triumph: The Woman's Building of the World's Columbian Exposition, Chicago, 1893 JAMES V. STRUEBER Ohio State University, AT1 JOHANNA HAYS Auburn University INTRODUCTION from Engineering Magazine, The World's Columbian Exposition (WCE) was the first world exposition outside of Europe and was to Thus has Chicago gloriously redeemed the commemorate the four hundredth anniversary of obligations incurred when she assumed the Columbus reaching the New World. The exhibition's task of building a World's Fair. Chicago's planners aimed at exceeding the fame of the 1889 businessmen started out to prepare for a Paris World Exposition in physical size, scope of finer, bigger, and more successful enter- accomplishment, attendance, and profitability.' prise than the world had ever seen in this With 27 million attending equaling approximately line. The verdict of the jury of the nations 40% of the 1893 US population, they exceeded of the earth, who have seen it, is that it the Paris Exposition in all accounts. This was partly is unquestionably bigger and undoubtedly accomplished by being open on Sundays-a much finer, and now it is assuredly more success- debated moral issue-the attraction of the newly ful. Great is Chicago, and we are prouder invented Ferris wheel, cheap quick nationwide than ever of her."5 transportation provided by the new transcontinental railroad system all helped to make a very successful BACKGROUND financial plans2Surprisingly, the women's contribu- tion to the exposition, which included the Woman's Labeled the "White City" almost immediately, for Building and other women's exhibits accounted for the arrangement of the all-white neo-Classical and 57% of total exhibits at the exp~sition.~In addition neo-High Renaissance architectural style buildings railroad development to accommodate the exposi- around a grand court and fountain poolI6 the WCE tion, set the heart of American trail transportation holds an ironic position in American history.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank Lloyd Wright
    Frank Lloyd Wright 1. http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/cph.3g04297 5. http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/hhh.il0039 Some designs and executed buildings by Frank Frederick C. Robie House, 5757 Woodlawn Avenue, Lloyd Wright, architect Chicago, Cook County, IL 2. http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/cph.3g01871 House ("Bogk House") for Frederick C. Bogk, 2420 North Terrace Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Stone lintel] http://memory.loc.gov/cgi- bin/query/r?pp/hh:@field(DOCID+@lit(PA1690)) Fallingwater, State Route 381 (Stewart Township), Ohiopyle vicinity, Fayette County, PA 3. http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/gsc.5a25495 Guggenheim Museum, 88th St. & 5th Ave., New York City. Under construction III. 6. 4. http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/cph.3c11252 http://memory.loc.gov/cgi- bin/query/r?ammem/alad:@field(DOCID+@lit(h19 Frank Lloyd Wright, Baroness Hilla Rebay, and 240)) Solomon R. Guggenheim standing beside a model of the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum] / Midway Gardens, interior, Chicago, IL Margaret Carson #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 PREVIOUS NEXT RECORDS LIST NEW SEARCH HELP Item 10 of 375 How to obtain copies of this item TITLE: Some designs and executed buildings by Frank Lloyd Wright, architect CALL NUMBER: Illus in NA737.W7 A4 1917 (Case Y) [P&P] REPRODUCTION NUMBER: LC-USZC4-4297 (color film copy transparency) LC-USZ62-116098 (b&w film copy neg.) SUMMARY: Silhouette of building with steeples on cover of Japanese journal issue devoted to Frank Lloyd Wright, with Japanese and English text. MEDIUM: 1 print : woodcut(?), color. CREATED/PUBLISHED: [1917] NOTES: Illus.
    [Show full text]
  • To Lead and Inspire Philanthropic Efforts That Measurably Improve the Quality of Life and the Prosperity of Our Region
    2008 ANNUAL REPORT To lead and inspire philanthropic efforts that measurably improve the quality of life and the prosperity of our region. OUR VALUES Five values define our promise to the individuals and communities we serve: INTEGRITY Our responsibility, first and foremost, is to uphold the public trust placed in us and to ensure that we emulate the highest ethical standards, honor our commitments, remain objective and transparent and respect all of our stakeholders. STEWARDSHIP & SERVICE We endeavor to provide the highest level of service and due diligence to our donors and grant recipients and to safeguard donor intent in perpetuity. DIVERSITY & INCLUSION Our strength is found in our differences and we strive to integrate diversity in all that we do. COLLABORATION We value the transformative power of partnerships based on mutual interests, trust and respect and we work in concert with those who are similarly dedicated to improving our community. INNOVATION We seek and stimulate new approaches to address what matters most to the people and we serve, as well as support, others who do likewise in our shared commitment to improve metropolitan Chicago. OUR VISION The Chicago Community Trust is committed to: • Maximizing our community and donor impact through strategic grant making and bold leadership; • Accelerating our asset growth by attracting new donors and creating a closer relationship with existing donors; • Delivering operational excellence to our donors, grant recipients and staff members. In 2008, The Chicago Community Trust addressed the foreclosure crisis by spearheading an action plan with over 100 experts from 70 nonprofit, private and public organizations.
    [Show full text]