Abstract Book May 18–21, 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abstract Book May 18–21, 2017 May 18–21, 2017 Sheraton New Orleans Abstract Book New Orleans, Louisiana Embracing Change and 72nd Diversity in Public Opinion Annual and Social Research Conference www.aapor.org/conference #AAPOR May 18th, 2017 3:30 PM - 4:30 PM Concurrent Session P Poster Session #1 Eye-Tracking Methodology: What Affects the Processing of Agree/Disagree and Item-Specific Questions? Jan Karem Höhne University of Göttingen Timo Lenzner GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Since Likert’s (1932) well-known article “A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes”, the use of agree/disagree (A/D) questions has become increasingly popular in empirical social research, because it appears to be possible to measure several constructs with a single response format. Fowler (1995), by contrast, argues that using item-specific (IS) questions represents a simpler, more direct, and more informative method than using agree/disagree questions. Until now, this assumption has never been tested empirically. In the current study, we investigate cognitive processing of A/D and IS questions in web surveys using eye-tracking methodology. Recording respondents’ eye movements, we are able to investigate how respondents process the survey questions and response categories to determine their information processing. We conducted an eye-tracking experiment with two groups: the first group (n = 44) received three A/D single questions dealing with different political issues (agree/disagree condition). The second group (n = 40) received three IS counterparts dealing with the same question content (item- specific condition). The results of our investigations indicate that IS questions encourage a deeper cognitive processing than A/D questions. Interestingly, the eye-tracking data reveal that this fact is only observable for the processing of the response categories. There are no differences with respect to the question stems; indicating that “question comprehension” seems to be equal. We therefore argue that the observed differences between these two question formats are directly attributed to a more active and more intensive cognitive processing of the IS response categories. May 18th, 2017 3:30 PM - 4:30 PM Concurrent Session P Poster Session #1 Impact of Mixed-Mode Recruitment and Data Collection on Sample Representativeness and Survey Estimates for a Probability-Based Household Panel Dan Malato NORC at the University of Chicago David Sterrett NORC at The University of Chicago Jennifer Benz NORC at the University of Chicago Trevor Tompson NORC at the University of Chicago J. Dennis NORC Vicki Pineau NORC at the Univ of Chicago Nadarajasundaram Ganesh NORC at the University of Chicago Most household panels in the US recruit their samples using the online mode and then also conduct their surveys online. The modes employed for panel recruitment and data collection are the same. In addition to relying on non-probability sampling, such mono-mode household web panels theoretically have at least two shortcomings with respect to sample coverage. First, regarding the mode of recruitment to the panel itself, web-only panels under-represent the fraction of the US population that does not have internet access and under-represents infrequent web users. Second, regarding the mode of data collection for panel-based surveys, web-only panels under-represent the fraction of the population that would prefer to participate in actual surveys by non-web modes, such as by telephone. Using data from NORC’s AmeriSpeak Panel surveys (which is based on mixed-mode recruitment and data collection), the authors will document the impact (i) on sample composition from recruiting households by multi-mode methods and (ii) on survey estimates by using multi-mode for specific attitude, knowledge, and opinion surveys. Analyses demonstrate that the use of multi-mode recruitment improves the representativeness of the constituted household panel with respect to boosting sample representativeness for low-income households, Hispanic ethnicity, and seniors. Analyses also demonstrate that panel respondents completing surveys by telephone tend to have less positive views towards science and consumer technology, as well as overall lower scientific literacy. The research provides significant insights into specific ways that providing non-web modes for recruitment and data collection can enhance sample representativeness and influence survey estimates on attitudinal and opinion measures, while also identifying instances of convergence of mono-mode and multi-mode survey estimates. May 18th, 2017 3:30 PM - 4:30 PM Concurrent Session P Poster Session #1 Meet the Independents: Using Cluster Analysis to Construct a Typology of Independent Voters Ayellet Pelled University of Wisconsin - Madison Megan Duncan University of Wisconsin - Madison Song Wang University of Wisconsin - Statistics Yin Wu University of Wisconsin - Madison Moonhoon Choi University of Wisconsin - Madison Jiyoun Suk University of Wisconsin - Madison Douglas McLeod University of Wisconsin - Madison Much of the recent research on political party identification has focused on partisan voters and the consequences of political polarization. But independent voters are also an important feature of the political landscape, but far fewer studies have examined them. Too often researchers treat independent voters as a monolithic entity, using a single response category to identify them. But as made clear by the 2016 presidential election, there are vast differences among independent voters. The independent voters who latched onto the Trump movement were different from those with the Sanders movement. The independent voters who occupied the space between the Democratic and Republican parties were very different from those on the far left and far right. Some independents have beliefs that align with the core of a party, but feel that the party has abandoned the party’s core principles (Walter, 2014). Additionally, the number of independent voters is on the rise, and their influence on election outcomes is growing. A recent Gallup poll showed party identification was near all-time-lows while 42 percent of Americans identified as independent (Jones, 2016). With these factors in mind, this study takes a closer look at the values and political attitudes that differentiate independent voters. Data for the analysis were collected using an online survey of 2,582 eligible voters provided by Survey Sampling International, of which 486 people identified as independents, and an additional 544 indicated they were independent but leaned toward one party. These independent voters were divided into clusters based on measures of political values and worldviews (e.g. political interests, political cynicism, political tolerance, authoritarianism, libertarianism, federalism). These clusters were further defined in terms of their demographic characteristics and linked to outcomes such as issue orientations, voting behaviors, and media use patterns. May 18th, 2017 3:30 PM - 4:30 PM Concurrent Session P Poster Session #1 Implications of Utilizing Consumer Grade GPS Receivers within a Transportation Research Application Josh DeLaRosa Abt Associates When paired with travel diaries, Global Positioning System (GPS) devices can provide transportation planners and modelers with rich transportation data. The GPS devices offer high resolution spatial and temporal data, which supplement diaries with attitudinal data (e.g., trip purpose). The GPS devices can also minimize the underreporting of trips in a diary by collecting data passively and continually. Common practice in transportation research is to provide respondents with consumer grade GPS devices, equivalent to the chipsets found in smartphones. However, urban canyons, weather and tree canopies can obstruct satellite reception resulting in the deterioration of GPS accuracy (type I and/or type II error). This error could lead ultimately lead to the introduction of error into transportation models. To overcome the deterioration of GPS accuracy, researchers can process the data and filter out suspected erroneous GPS points. To better understand possible measurement error associated with consumer grade GPS devices, this study will test and compare several GPS loggers. This study will also test different methods of processing GPS data. The results of these test may help researchers better predicting conditions leading to GPS measurement error as well as quantifying the limitations and advantages of collecting GPS data within a transportation application. May 18th, 2017 3:30 PM - 4:30 PM Concurrent Session P Poster Session #1 The Practice of SMS Survey as Public Opinion Research in Japan Kentaro Watanabe Osaka University Yasuyuki Saito The Asahi Shimbun In this study, we test the SMS (Short Message Service) mode and compare the result with the Asahi Shimbun CPRDD (Cell Phone RDD) data to examine the response tendencies. In Japan, the SMS mode has become available since 2011. We are aware that one market research company conducted the research, however it is not open to the public. In this research, the sample frame is Softbank mobile users. We sent the SMS message to a random-sampled 10,900 numbers and 5,724 received the message. 102 (1.8%) of them accessed the web site and 49 (0.9%) answered. For the CPRDD, 5,500 numbers were sampled and 1,132 (20.6%) answered. The accessing rate and the response rate are different between weekday and weekend. The accessing became stable after 10 hours on weekday, and the accessing rate on weekend
Recommended publications
  • You're a Green One
    NOVEMBER | DECEMBER 2019 You’re a Green One, MR. GRINCH! HOW DR. SEUSS ’25 TURNED HIS FAVORITE CHARACTER INTO A HOLIDAY TV CLASSIC FIVE DOLLARS 191111_MariMari_Ivy.indd 1 9/23/19 8:30 AM 1 cover n/d 19 real.indd 2 10/2/19 3:58 PM H W’ P B B LISTINGNEW SOLD 1979. Your first real responsibility KING ROAD - Hanover, NH SLEEPY HOLLOW FARM - Pomfret, VT drooled a lot. Which seems pretty manageable compared to having kids in college and aging parents to care for in 2019. ADAMS HILL ROAD - Newfane, VT THE TRUMBULL HOUSE - Hanover, NH One minute you’re just a kid with a new dog. The next, life’s far more complicated. That’s why a Raymond James financial advisor will partner with you to build a plan that is designed to account for your increasingly complex financial needs. From tuition and senior care, to your own desire to enjoy the retirement lifestyle you’ve always wanted. LIFE WELL PLANNED . JOHN S. BANKS, CFP®, D'90 Financial Advisor / Managing Director 5 T G, W, VT 802.457.2600 35 S M S, H, NH 603.643.0599 T: 585.485.6341 @ . . [email protected] johnbankswealthmanagement.com Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. owns the certification marks CFP®. © 2019 Raymond James & Associates, Inc., member New York Stock Exchange/SIPC. 19-BR3RM-0005 TA 6/19 S . P . BIG PICTURE Palm Readers | Nearly 200 miniature books are preserved in the Rauner Special Collections Library, which librarians have been showcasing on Instagram. The books fit easily into the palm of your hand— some are as tiny as a fingerprint and accompanied by a tiny magnifying glass.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics Book Discussion Guide
    One Book One Northwestern Book Group Discussion Politics Politics ¡ How do you think someone’s political affiliation (Republican, Democrat, Green, Libertarian, Independent, etc.) may affect his or her analysis of the likelihood of certain world events? When have you seen this happen in real life? ¡ E.g. elections, wars, trade deals, environmental policy, etc. ¡ How can someone manage his or her own biases when making political predictions? Use your ideas and Silver’s. ¡ This election cycle has had a series of anomalies, especially regarding the race for and selection of presidential candidates. ¡ What specific anomalies have you noticed in this election cycle? ¡ How can political analysts factor in the possibility of anomalies in their predictions, given that there is no model to look back on that incorporates these anomalies? Politics ¡ In May 2016, Nate Silver published a blog post called “How I Acted Like A Pundit And Screwed Up On Donald Trump.” In the post, he lists reasons for why he incorrectly predicted that Trump would not win the Republican nomination for President, including that he ignored polls in favor of “educated guesses.” Harry Enten, a senior analyst at Nate Silver’s website FiveThirtyEight, describes more of this problem in an interview with This American Life. ¡ Why do you think Silver and his team ignored polls in this case, when they have relied on them heavily in the past? ¡ How do you think Silver’s predictions would have turned out differently if he had taken polls into consideration? ¡ Do you think Silver’s personal biases regarding the presidential candidate influenced his decisions when making his predictions? Why or why not? Politics: Case Study ¡ The Context: In July 2016, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was criticized for making public statements about the unfitness of presidential candidate Donald Trump.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 AAPOR Annual Conference
    May 18–21, 2017 Sheraton New Orleans Conference Program New Orleans, Louisiana Embracing Change and 72nd Diversity in Public Opinion Annual and Social Research Conference www.aapor.org/conference #AAPOR Introducing PARC A unique knowledge management tool for all your survey research files Find It. Fast. PARC™ is a secure, cloud-based application to store, search and instantly access your organization’s research materials. It parses and delivers individual survey questions and project documents, with all related files a single click away. Be Highly Organized, Efficient and Accurate Reinforce Your Client Relationships Disseminate to Stakeholders or the Public See it work and grab a free PARC USB drive! Exhibit Hall, 3rd Floor, Booth 10 Join our charter subscribers, including: Institutional memory is not a system. PARC is. Conference Program AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH 72nd Annual Conference Table of Contents Welcome to New Orleans 4 Wednesday, May 17 Conference App 5 Wednesday at-a-Glance 42 2017 Webinar Series 5 Wednesday Schedule of Events 43 General Conference Information 6 Highlights 7-10 Thursday, May 18 AAPOR’s Commitment to Diversity 11-13 Thursday at-a-Glance 44-45 Things to Do, Places to Go: Social Activities 14 Thursday Schedule of Events 46-58 AAPOR Executive Council 15-17 Chapter Presidents 17 Friday, May 19 Past Presidents 18 Friday at-a-Glance 59-62 Executive Office Staff 18 Friday Schedule of Events 63-89 Honorary Life Members 19 Committees/Task Forces 20-27 Saturday, May 20 Saturday at-a-Glance 90-94
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Law Review Volume 52 2019 Number 1
    Indiana Law Review Volume 52 2019 Number 1 SYMPOSIUM HOOSIER BRIDESMAIDS MARGO M. LAMBERT* A. CHRISTOPHER BRYANT** Indiana proudly proclaims itself the “Crossroads of America.”1 While some northeast-corridor cynics might deride the boast as a paraphrase for flyover country, there is no denying the political significance of the Hoosier State’s geographical and cultural centrality. As one of Indiana’s most celebrated historians has observed, “[b]y the beginning of the twentieth century Indiana was often cited as the most typical of American states, perhaps because Hoosiers in this age of transition generally resisted radical change and were able usually to balance moderate change with due attention to the continuities of life and culture.”2 Throughout the Gilded Age, elections in the state were so closely fought that the winning party rarely claimed more than slimmest majority.3 At the time, Indiana tended to favor Republicans over Democrats, but the races were close with Democrats claiming their share of victories.4 During these years, voter turnout remained high in presidential elections, with Indiana ranging from the eightieth to the ninetieth percentiles, no doubt a product of the closeness of the contests. Such voter turnout substantially exceeded that typical of surrounding states.5 Hoosiers liked to politick. The state’s high voter participation may also have been, in some part, attributable to its relaxed voting laws for adult males during the nineteenth * Associate Professor of History, University of Cincinnati Blue Ash College. ** Rufus King Professor of Constitutional Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law. The authors, proud Hoosiers by birth and Buckeyes by professional opportunity, thank first and foremost Brad Boswell for entrusting us with the opportunity to open the March 29, 2018 Symposium.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture of Lies Understanding Fake News & Its Spiritual Ramifications
    Culture of Lies Understanding Fake News & Its Spiritual Ramifications Timothy Zebell CreateSpace Publisher Culture of Lies Copyright © 2019 by Timothy Zebell. Unless otherwise indicated, all Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version, copyright ©2001 by Crossway Bibles, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. ISBN-9781693873225 Imprint: Independently Published Contents _____________________ 1. The State of Our Media ................................................................ 1 2. The President’s Fake News Awards ................................... 11 3. A Culture of Lies ....................................................................... 25 4. The Anatomy of Fake News .............................................. 51 5. Three Types of Fake News ....................................................... 65 6. A Long History of Fake News .......................................... 85 7. Fake Polls & Fake Fact-Checkers ............................................. 97 8. Fake Hate ......................................................................... 115 9. The Growing Threat of Censorship ....................................... 125 10. When Fake News Becomes a Culture of Lies ................ 139 Appendix A – Further Details of Examples Used .............. 149 Appendix B – Additional Examples of Fake News in the Era of Trump: 2016 .............................................. 157 Appendix C – Additional Examples of Fake News in the Era of Trump: 2017 .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Not for Citation Or Circulation Trumpism, Post-Truth, and the Crisis of Political
    NOT FOR CITATION OR CIRCULATION TRUMPISM, POST-TRUTH, AND THE CRISIS OF POLITICAL SCIENCE1 By: Edwin Kent Morris, Ph.D. Radford University Department of Political Science CHBS 5302, P.O. 6945 Radford, VA 24142 Phone: 540-831-6598 Fax: 540-831-6599 [email protected] AUTHOR DETAILS EDWIN KENT MORRIS holds a Ph.D. in Social, Political, Ethical, and Cultural Thought from the ASPECT (i.e., Alliance for the Social, Political Ethical, and Cultural Thought) interdisciplinary doctoral program at Virginia Tech. He has been published in the International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music (IRASM), and has published five articles in the ASPECT online journal SPECTRA. He has presented papers at the International Studies Association and the Western Political Science Association. As an instructor at Virginia Tech, he received recognition for excellence in teaching and research, including a 2014 “Thank a Teacher” by the Center for Instructional Development and Educational Research (CIDER), and has been a recipient of the 2012 “Favorite Faculty Award” by the Virginia Tech student association, and the 2011 “Best Master’s Thesis Award” by the Virginia Tech Department of Political Science. He is currently an adjunct faculty member with the Department of Political Science at Radford University. 1 I assume like many folks in this line of work that we all felt compelled in some way to ‘respond’ to the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. This paper began the day after that election and was ‘finished’ September 2017 (that is, I grew weary of working on it and had other projects and matters to attend too).
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 S T U D I E S I N M I D W E S T E R N H I S T O R Y
    S T U D I E S I N M I D W E S T E R N H I S T O R Y VOL. 3, NO. 1 January, 2017 TRUMP AND THE MIDWEST: THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND THE AVENUES OF MIDWESTERN HISTORIOGRAPHY Jon K. Lauck1 Perhaps the biggest story of the surprising 2016 presidential election was Donald Trump’s vic- tories in the Midwest, which, according to President Obama’s 2012 campaign manager David Plouffe, left the “blue Big Ten firewall in ruins.”2 The Columbus Dispatch reported that “one of the more stunning aspects of the surprise presidential victory of Republican Donald Trump was the way that states in the industrial Midwest fell like dominoes for him.”3 Trump won Wisconsin, Michigan, Iowa, and Ohio, all of which Barack Obama had won in both 2008 and 2012.4 Wis- consin had not voted for the Republican candidate for president since the Reagan 49-state land- slide of 1984 and Michigan had not since 1988. Iowa had supported Michael Dukakis, Bill Clinton twice, and narrowly supported Al Gore in 2000 and George Bush in 2004 before voting for Obama twice. Ohio served as a classic bellwether and had voted to support the winner of the presidential 1 Jon K. Lauck is an adjunct professor of history and political science at the University of South Dakota and the author of The Lost Region: Toward a Revival of Midwestern History (Iowa City, University of Iowa Press, 2016). 2 David Plouffe, “What I Got Wrong About the Election,” New York Times, November 11, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • The Company They Keep: How Partisan
    The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court Neal Devins, College of William and Mary Lawrence Baum, Ohio State University Table of Contents Chapter 1: Summary of Book and Argument 1 Chapter 2: The Supreme Court and Elites 21 Chapter 3: Elites, Ideology, and the Rise of the Modern Court 100 Chapter 4: The Court in a Polarized World 170 Chapter 5: Conclusions 240 Chapter 1 Summary of Book and Argument On September 12, 2005, Chief Justice nominee John Roberts told the Senate Judiciary Committee that “[n]obody ever went to a ball game to see the umpire. I will 1 remember that it’s my job to call balls and strikes and not to pitch or bat.” Notwithstanding Robert’s paean to judicial neutrality, then Senator Barack Obama voted against the Republican nominee. Although noting that Roberts was “absolutely . qualified,” Obama said that what mattered was the “5 percent of hard cases,” cases resolved not by adherence to legal rules but decided by “core concerns, one’s broader perspectives of how the world works, and the depth and breadth of one’s empathy.”2 But with all 55 Republicans backing Roberts, Democratic objections did not matter. Today, the dance between Roberts and Senate Democrats and Republicans seems so predictable that it now seems a given that there will be proclamations of neutrality by Supreme Court nominees and party line voting by Senators. Indeed, Senate Republicans blocked a vote on Obama Supreme Court pick Merrick Garland in 2016 so that (in the words of Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell) “the American people .
    [Show full text]
  • Climate of Fear: How the Most Privileged Voices in America Have Made Climate Change Denial Mainstream Duncan B
    Fordham University Masthead Logo DigitalResearch@Fordham Student Theses 2015-Present Environmental Studies Spring 5-12-2016 Climate of Fear: How the Most Privileged Voices in America Have Made Climate Change Denial Mainstream Duncan B. Magidson Fordham University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://fordham.bepress.com/environ_2015 Recommended Citation Magidson, Duncan B., "Climate of Fear: How the Most Privileged Voices in America Have Made Climate Change Denial Mainstream" (2016). Student Theses 2015-Present. 30. https://fordham.bepress.com/environ_2015/30 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Environmental Studies at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses 2015-Present by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Climate of Fear: How the Most Privileged Voices in America Have Made Climate Change Denial Mainstream Source: C-SPAN.org Duncan Magidson Senior Thesis Environmental Studies Spring 2016 !1 Abstract Climate change is a serious threat to the continued existence of human civilization. Despite this, the United States has yet to pass meaningful legislation to cub greenhouse gas emissions. Although tackling environmental issues once had a broad bipartisan support, the issue of climate change has driven a wedge between Democratic and Republican voters and politicians. Consequently, the United States finds itself deadlocked in the political sphere, unable to come together on any real strategies to adapt to the realities of a changing world. The driving force behind the lack of American action on climate change is the persistence of denial. Climate change denial appeals to those who hold a privileged position in American society.
    [Show full text]
  • MAPPING the RESISTANCE Insurgence and Polarization Between 2016 and 2020
    MAPPING THE RESISTANCE Insurgence and Polarization Between 2016 and 2020 By Ethan Young Table of Contents Up Against Trump: From Fragmentation to Unity..........................................................................1 Mapping the Resistance Insurgence and Polarization Between 2016 and 2020.............................................................2 By Ethan Young Power and Resistance..................................................................................................3 Political Anatomy of the Resistance..........................................................................................5 Center-right and Centrist Democrats..........................................................................5 The Democrats and the Left: Social Movements.......................................................8 Finding a Focal Point....................................................................................................13 The Union Dilemma.....................................................................................................14 The Democrats and the Left: Political Action...........................................................15 The Socialist Dilemma.................................................................................................18 Political Problems of the Resistance........................................................................................20 What Workers’ Movement?.........................................................................................22 United Front
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of 2016 Election Polls in the United States
    AN EVALUATION OF 2016 ELECTION POLLS IN THE UNITED STATES AD HOC COMMITTEE ON 2016 ELECTION POLLING COURTNEY KENNEDY, Pew Research Center MARK BLUMENTHAL, SurveyMonkey SCOTT CLEMENT, Washington Post JOSHUA D. CLINTON, Vanderbilt University CLAIRE DURAND, University of Montreal CHARLES FRANKLIN, Marquette University KYLEY MCGEENEY, Pew Research Center1 LEE MIRINGOFF, Marist College KRISTEN OLSON, University of Nebraska-Lincoln DOUG RIVERS, Stanford University, YouGov LYDIA SAAD, Gallup EVANS WITT, Princeton Survey Research Associates CHRIS WLEZIEN, University of Texas at Austin The Committee was supported by the following researchers: Junjie Chen, Andrew Engelhardt, Arnold Lau, Marc Trussler, Luis Patricio Pena Ibarra 1 Several months after joining the committee, Kyley McGeeney took a position at PSB, her current employer. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2016 presidential election was a jarring event for polling in the United States. Pre-election polls fueled high-profile predictions that Hillary Clinton’s likelihood of winning the presidency was about 90 percent, with estimates ranging from 71 to over 99 percent. When Donald Trump was declared the winner of the presidency in the early hours of November 9th, it came as a shock even to his own pollsters (Jacobs and House 2016). There was (and continues to be) widespread consensus that the polls failed. But did the polls fail? And if so why? Those are the central questions addressed in this report, which was commissioned by the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). This report is the product of a committee convened in the Spring of 2016 with a threefold goal: evaluate the accuracy of 2016 pre-election polling for both the primaries and the general election, review variation by different survey methodologies, and identify significant differences between election surveys in 2016 and polling in prior election years.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Overview Social Media
    From: Lewis, Lena To: Hall, Vince; McCormack, Irene; DRBOB Subject: FW: 10 hits from Meltwater News Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:10:27 PM Attachments: facebook_share.png twitter_tweet.png ------------------------------------------- From: [email protected][SMTP:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:02:56 PM To: Lewis, Lena Subject: 10 hits from Meltwater News Auto forwarded by a Rule Your contact person: Kris Williams | [email protected] | 415-544-7658 Log in | Preferences Love Meltwater News? Refer a friend and go shopping! News Report from Meltwater News Report Overview Agent Media Type Hits Social Media Social Media 10 in 8 hours Social Media LaPlayaHeritage:#Walk to School with @bobfilnermayor on 4/29: 8:15am: Point Loma-Hervey Library 3701 Voltaire St. @WalkSanDiego1 @SafeRoutesCA twitter.com | 04/23/13 14:50 Share Archive Marston House:San Diego Mayor Bob Filner's bike gang: The school kids of South Park. http://t.co/4zkkUFPUpr (via @hblackson) twitter.com | 04/23/13 12:46 Share Archive Matthew T. Hall:San Diego Mayor Bob Filner's bike gang: The school kids of South Park. http://t.co/4zkkUFPUpr (via @hblackson) twitter.com | 04/23/13 12:24 Share Archive Charity Brewing:Have a brew (donated by @PB_AleHouse) with Mayor Bob Filner & support the La Jolla Seal Cam! Ticket Info here- http://t.co/5aB2AWQDtO @KPBS twitter.com | 04/23/13 11:58 Share Archive Sherri Lightner:45+ employers committed to HIRING @SherriLightner @AlvarezSD @ToddGloria @kevin_faulconer @BobFilnerMayor @LorieZapfD6 @MartiEmeraldSD twitter.com | 04/23/13 11:54 Share Archive Elyse Lowe:#Walk to School with @bobfilnermayor on 4/29: 8:15am: Point Loma- Hervey Library 3701 Voltaire St.
    [Show full text]