Tugboat, Volume 33 (2012), No. 1 53 TEX on Windows: Miktex Or TEX Live? Joseph Wright on Windows, There Are Two Actively-Develop
TUGboat, Volume 33 (2012), No. 1 53 TEX on Windows: MiKTEX or TEX Live? A reminder that MiKTEX and TEX Live are not the only choices. W32TEX (Kakuto, 2012) is popular Joseph Wright in the far east. As well as being a TEX system in On Windows, there are two actively-developed free its own right, it is the source of the Windows binar- TEX systems with similar coverage: MiKTEX (Schenk, ies for TEX Live, and TEX Live acquires more CJK 2011) and TEX Live (TEX Users Group, 2011). The support from it every year. For users focussed on good news is that there is a lot of similarity between ConTEXt, ConTEXt standalone (Pragma ADE, 2012) the two systems, so for most users both systems is probably the best way to go (it uses the W32TEX are equally usable, and (LA)TEX documents are port- binaries on Windows). There are also the commer- able between them. However, there are differences cial options, for example BaKoMa TEX (BaKoMa and depending on what you need these might be Soft., 2011) or PCTEX (Personal TEX, Inc., 2011). important. However, for most users it comes down to a choice between the ‘big two’. • The default settings install everything for TEX Live, but only a minimal set of packages for References MiKT X. MiKT X will then install extra pack- E E BaKoMa Soft. “BaKoMa T X 9.77”. ages ‘on the fly’, while T X Live does not (there E E http://www.bakoma-tex.com/, 2011. is a package to do that in TEX Live, but it is aimed at GNU/Linux users).
[Show full text]