DOCSLIB.ORG

Bruegel Notes Writing of the Novel Began October 20, 1998

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bruegel Notes Writing of the Novel Began October 20, 1998 Rudy Rucker, Notes for Ortelius and Bruegel, June 17, 2011 The Life of Bruegel Notes Writing of the novel began October 20, 1998. Finished first fully proofed draft on May 20, 2000 at 107,353 words. Did nothing for a year and seven months. Did revisions January 9, 2002 - March 1, 2002. Did additional revisions March 18, 2002. Latest update of the notes, September 7, 2002 64,353 Words. Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................... 1 Timeline .................................................................................................................. 9 Painting List .......................................................................................................... 10 Word Count ........................................................................................................... 12 Title ....................................................................................................................... 13 Chapter Ideas ......................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 1. Bruegel. Alps. May, 1552. Mountain Landscape. ....................... 13 Chapter 2. Bruegel. Rome. July, 1553. The Tower of Babel. ....................... 14 Chapter 3. Ortelius. Antwerp. February, 1556. The Battle Between Carnival and Lent......................................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 4. Bruegel. Antwerp. February, 1556. Skaters with Bird Trap. ....... 14 Chapter 5. Ortelius. Antwerp. March, 1556. Lust. ........................................ 14 Chapter 6. Bruegel. Antwerp. September, 1560. The Peasant Wedding. ..... 15 Chapter 7. Anja. Antwerp. August, 1561. The Parable of the Blind. ............ 15 Chapter 8. Bruegel. Mechelen. April, 1562. Dulle Griet. ............................. 15 Chapter 9. Ortelius. Antwerp. October, 1562. The Sermon of John the Baptist. .......................................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 10. Bruegel. Brussels. November, 1562. The Peasant and the Birdsnester. ................................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 11. Mayken. Brussels. December, 1564. The Adoration of the Kings. ....................................................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 12. Bruegel. Brussels & Antwerp. January 1566. The Hunters in the Snow. ............................................................................................................................ 17 Chapter 13. Ortelius. Antwerp. August, 1566. The Beggars. ....................... 17 Chapter 14. Mayken. Brussels. January 1567 - September, 1567. Lazy Luciousland. .................................................................................................................. 18 Chapter 15. Bruegel. Brussels. June 5, 1568. The Beekeepers. ..................... 18 Chapter 16. Mayken. Brussels. January 1569 - September, 1569. The Magpie on the Gallows. ............................................................................................................. 19 Point of View ........................................................................................................ 20 Related People ...................................................................................................... 20 Fictional Characters .......................................................................................... 20 Williblad Cheroo ........................................................................................... 20 1 Rudy Rucker, Notes for Ortelius and Bruegel, June 17, 2011 Niay Serrão ................................................................................................... 21 Patrons and Collectors ...................................................................................... 21 Hans Franckert .............................................................................................. 21 Niclaes Jonghelinck ...................................................................................... 21 Abraham Ortels ............................................................................................. 22 Antoine Perronet, Cardinal de Granvelle ...................................................... 24 Margaret of Parma ........................................................................................ 25 Alexander Farnese......................................................................................... 25 Archduke Ernst ............................................................................................. 25 Jerome Cock.................................................................................................. 25 Christopher Plantin ....................................................................................... 26 Cartographers .................................................................................................... 26 Scipio Fabius ................................................................................................. 26 Mercator ........................................................................................................ 26 Gemma Frisius .............................................................................................. 27 Family ............................................................................................................... 27 Peter Coeck van Aelst ................................................................................... 27 Mayken Verhulst-Bessemers ........................................................................ 28 Mayken Coeck van Aalst .............................................................................. 28 Pieter Brueghel the Younger ......................................................................... 28 Jan Brueghel .................................................................................................. 28 Politicians .......................................................................................................... 29 Duke of Alva ................................................................................................. 29 Legendary Figures ............................................................................................. 29 Prester John ................................................................................................... 29 Artists ................................................................................................................ 29 Pieter Aertsen ................................................................................................ 29 Pieter Baltens. ............................................................................................... 29 Herri met de Bles .......................................................................................... 29 Hieronymus Bosch ........................................................................................ 30 Joachim Bueckelaer ...................................................................................... 31 Joos van Cleve .............................................................................................. 31 Michiel Coxie ............................................................................................... 31 Lucas Cranach ............................................................................................... 31 Albrecht Dürer .............................................................................................. 31 Frans Floris ................................................................................................... 31 Joris Hoefnagel ............................................................................................. 32 Frans Huys .................................................................................................... 32 Pieter Huys .................................................................................................... 32 Aertgen von Leyden ...................................................................................... 32 Jan Mandyn ................................................................................................... 32 Jan Massys .................................................................................................... 32 Joos de Momper (the Younger) .................................................................... 32 Bernard van Orley ......................................................................................... 33 Marinus van Reymerswaele .......................................................................... 33 2 Rudy Rucker, Notes for Ortelius and Bruegel, June 17, 2011 Peter Paul Rubens ......................................................................................... 33 Lucas van Vakkenborch ................................................................................ 33 Tobias Verhaecht .......................................................................................... 33 Martin de Vos ............................................................................................... 33 Things To Do ........................................................................................................ 33 Proofing ............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Landscape with a Cart Crossing a River Oil on Panel 85.1 X 126.4 Cm (34½ X 49¾ In)
    Lucas van Uden (Antwerp 1595 - Antwerp 1672) Landscape with a Cart Crossing a River oil on panel 85.1 x 126.4 cm (34½ x 49¾ in) In Landscape with a Cart Crossing a River, Lucas van Uden depicts a horse-drawn cart, laden with huge stones, as it struggles across the uneven ground, a man straining as he tries to help the horses cross the river. The painting is dominated by the craggy cliff, overgrown with gnarled trees it splits the painting in two, with a dark river to the left hand side, and the brightly lit countryside on the right. There is a distinct split in moods in van Uden’s work, with the left-hand side dark and forbidding, the river threatening the progress of the cart and two birds circling ominously overhead. Contrasted to this is the right hand side of the work where the pastoral landscape is bathed in a soft, warm light. Van Uden’s watercolours and etchings, for which he is most admired, display this same refined sense of light and mood. Van Uden’s painting is a close repetition of a composition by Peter Paul Rubens’ Landscape with Stone Carriers. The major difference between the two paintings is that van Uden has eliminated the rider of the near horse. Although it has long been thought that van Uden was a member of Rubens’ workshop and provided landscape backgrounds for some of the master’s compositions, there is no documentary evidence to support the assumption. Nonetheless, he clearly knew Rubens’ work very well, for he copied several other compositions, as well as borrowing specific motifs from the older artist.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/28/2021 10:23:11PM Via Free Access Notes to Chapter 1 671
    Notes 1 Introduction. Fall and Redemption: The Divine Artist 1 Émile Verhaeren, “La place de James Ensor Michelangelo, 3: 1386–98; Summers, Michelangelo dans l’art contemporain,” in Verhaeren, James and the Language of Art, 238–39. Ensor, 98: “À toutes les périodes de l’histoire, 11 Sulzberger, “Les modèles italiens,” 257–64. ces influences de peuple à peuple et d’école à 12 Siena, Church of the Carmines, oil on panel, école se sont produites. Jadis l’Italie dominait 348 × 225 cm; Sanminiatelli, Domenico profondément les Floris, les Vaenius et les de Vos. Beccafumi, 101–02, no. 43. Tous pourtant ont trouvé place chez nous, dans 13 E.g., Bhabha, Location of Culture; Burke, Cultural notre école septentrionale. Plus tard, Pierre- Hybridity; Burke, Hybrid Renaissance; Canclini, Paul Rubens s’en fut à son tour là-bas; il revint Hybrid Cultures; Spivak, An Aesthetic Education. italianisé, mais ce fut pour renouveler tout l’art See also the overview of Mabardi, “Encounters of flamand.” a Heterogeneous Kind,” 1–20. 2 For an overview of scholarship on the painting, 14 Kim, The Traveling Artist, 48, 133–35; Payne, see the entry by Carl Van de Velde in Fabri and “Mescolare,” 273–94. Van Hout, From Quinten Metsys, 99–104, no. 3. 15 In fact, Vasari also uses the term pejoratively to The church received cathedral status in 1559, as refer to German art (opera tedesca) and to “bar- discussed in Chapter Nine. barous” art that appears to be a bad assemblage 3 Silver, The Paintings of Quinten Massys, 204–05, of components; see Payne, “Mescolare,” 290–91.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Connection Between Rough Brushstrokes and Vulgar Subjects in Seventeenth-Century Netherlandish Paintings Author(S) Fukaya
    Connection between Rough Brushstrokes and Vulgar Subjects Title in Seventeenth-Century Netherlandish Paintings Author(s) Fukaya, Michiko Citation Kyoto Studies in Art History (2017), 2: 55-71 Issue Date 2017-04 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/229460 © Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University and the Right authors Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University 55 Connection between Rough Brushstrokes and Vulgar Subjects in Seventeenth-Century Netherlandish Paintings Michiko Fukaya 1. Introduction Karel van Mander stated in his Schilder-boeck that painters at the time were accustomed to applying their paint more thickly than before; hence, their paintings were made seemingly of stone relief.1 At the same time, he used the terms “uneven and rough (oneffen en rouw)” and “beautifully, neat and clear (schoon, net en blijde)” as two contrasting manners in the application of paint.2 His comment is followed by a well-known passage referring to Titian’s earlier style, executed “with incredible neatness (met onghelooflijcke netticheyt)” and his later one, “with stains and rough strokes (met vlecken en rouw’ streken)”. In 1604, when van Mander was writing the above passage, it was uncommon among Netherlandish painters to paint so thickly that their paintings might be compared to a relief. Nevertheless, in Lives of the Northern Painters, van Mander mentioned two painters who applied their paint so thick that the canvas could not be rolled or had to be scraped off,3 although such rough manner was more tightly connected to the Italian style. In any event, the dichotomy of the neatness and the roughness of application of the paint was introduced into Netherlandish art theory at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments in Religious Art: Style and Audience
    CHAPTER 7 Experiments in Religious Art: Style and Audience The Raising of the Brazen Serpent (fig. 7.1; cat. H.25), engraved on two large copperplates by Pieter van der Heyden and published by Hieronymus Cock in 1555 with an important imperial privilege, re- cords the design of what must have been among the largest paintings Frans Floris produced for his illustrious early patron, the states- man and cleric Cardinal Antoine Perrenot de Granvelle (fig. 7.17). Depicting the punishment inflicted on the Israelites because of their doubts and ingratitude, this spectacular engraving is an image about the salvific powers of looking. God sent poisonous serpents to attack the restive Israelites in the desert. After Moses intervened, the deity commanded them to set up a brazen serpent so that all who looked on it would be healed (Numbers 21: 6–9). In its iconography and its materiality, van der Heyden’s print, an image made from “brazen” copper plates, advances the efficacy of sight as a vehicle for salvation. While the entwining of antique form and Christian content had become a convention of Renaissance art by the sixteenth century, the specificity of the allusions to classical and distinctly Roman art in this sacred istoria is particularly strik- ing. Many of Floris’s writhing figures are explicitly based on antique prototypes and the work of Michelangelo (particularly his Sistine ceiling) and they combine here to form an overpowering display of afflicted bodies arranged as though in a relief. The eye follows the undulating musculature of Floris’s contorted, tormented figures as they fill the image’s foreground, until eventually the gaze reaches the upper left corner where Moses raises up the serpent and those who look upon it are restored to health.
    [Show full text]
  • December-2016.Pdf
    the hollstein journal december 2016 It is my great pleasure to write these first few lines introducing our first e-newsletter. Via this medium, which we aim to publish at least twice a year, we will keep you informed about various Hollstein projects: more in depth information about some of our current projects, new research, publication schedules, as well as other activities connected to Dutch and Flemish and German prints before 1700. In this first issue you will be introduced by Ad Stijnman to Johannes Teyler and the à la poupée printing technique. These volumes to be published in our series The New Hollstein Dutch & Flemish Etchings, Engravings and Woodcuts, 1450-1700 will be the first ever to be in full colour. Some of our previous volumes on the oeuvres of Hendrick Goltzius and Frans Floris already included a few colour plates but Teyler’s substantial oeuvre covers every colour of the rainbow. Marjolein Leesberg will discuss Gerard and Cornelis de Jode. Her research on the De Jode dynasty resulted in such a wealth of new material that we decided to divide The New Hollstein Dutch & Flemish volumes into two separate publications. The first will cover Gerard and Cornelis de Jode and the second following comprises the subsequent family members Pieter de Jode I, Pieter de Jode II, and Arnold de Jode. With the end of the year quickly approaching, I, on behalf of the whole team, would like to take the opportunity to wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous 2017. Frits Garritsen Director johannes teyler and dutch colour printing 1685-1710 The group of prints compiled for the forthcoming The à la poupée process had been used since 1457,2 New Hollstein volumes concern what are known as usually inking copper plates but also woodblocks in ‘Teyler prints’.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape by a Riverside Town, Said to Be Treviso Oil on Oak Panel 47.4 X 77.9 Cm (18⅝ X 30¾ In)
    Philippe de Momper (Antwerp 1598 - Antwerp 1634) Landscape by a Riverside Town, said to be Treviso oil on oak panel 47.4 x 77.9 cm (18⅝ x 30¾ in) In this charming work, Phillippe de Momper has captured the daily life of this riverside town, traditionally thought to be Treviso. The picture is dotted with figures hard at work, from the father and son trotting alongside their horses in the foreground, to the numerous fishermen fixing their boats or hauling in their catch. The left-hand side of the work is dominated by the river, underlying the central role it plays in the figures’ lives, and to the right is a sprawl of buildings gently rising atop a hill. On the right-hand side stands the remains of an ancient viaduct which over time has become engulfed by vegetation. The attribution to de Momper is based on the research of Dr Klaus Ertz. In his 1986 monograph on Philippe’s father Joos de Momper (1564-1635), Ertz ascribed to Philippe a cohesive group of paintings, mainly depicting Treviso and Rome, including the present example, which had traditionally been attributed to Joos and known as the Treviso group.¹ A comparison with another work from the group, View of a Village beside a River, illustrates how consistent the works are in terms of content and style. A broad expanse of water runs vertically through the picture planes, linking foreground to back. The water is populated in both cases by villagers working on their boats, and on the river banks we see a range of buildings, from grand civic structures to humble dwellings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Notion of the Painter-Architect (Antwerpen, 1-3 Dec 11)
    The Notion of the Painter-Architect (Antwerpen, 1-3 Dec 11) Antwerpen, Dec 1–03, 2011 Registration deadline: Nov 25, 2011 Véronique Van de Kerckhof The Notion of the Painter-Architect in Italy and the Southern Netherlands – Rubenianum, Antwerp, 1-3 December 2011 In conjunction with the “Palazzo Rubens. The Master as Architect” exhibition, the Rubenianum, the Rubens House and the Department of Design of the University of Antwerp organize an internation- al colloquium under the title “The Notion of the Painter-Architect in Italy and the Southern Nether- lands”. The colloquium will take place on 1, 2 and 3 December 2011 in Antwerp. Registration is open until 25 November; please use the online registration form on www.palazzorubens.be/en/inschrijven. Content Since the time of Vitruvius, architects have been expected to have a broad knowledge of the arts and sciences. The need for good skills in sketching and working up drawings even led, from the sixteenth century onwards, to fierce debates on the meaning and status of ‘disegno’. With the rise of the Baroque, it was even alleged that in order to be a competent architect, one had to be a pain- ter as well. While Italy saw the emergence of famous painters who excelled as architects, also in the South- ern Netherlands the notion that an architect must also have a mastery of the painter’s art became widespread, owing in part to the dissemination of publications by Sebastiano Serlio and Pieter Coecke van Aelst. In the seventeenth century, Peter Paul Rubens was able to make his own contri- bution to this discussion as a consequence of his sojourns in Italy (1601–1608).
    [Show full text]
  • Light and Sight in Ter Brugghen's Man Writing by Candlelight
    Volume 9, Issue 1 (Winter 2017) Light and Sight in ter Brugghen’s Man Writing by Candlelight Susan Donahue Kuretsky [email protected] Recommended Citation: Susan Donahue Kuretsky, “Light and Sight in ter Brugghen’s Man Writing by Candlelight,” JHNA 9:1 (Winter 2017) DOI: 10.5092/jhna.2017.9.1.4 Available at https://jhna.org/articles/light-sight-ter-brugghens-man-writing-by-candlelight/ Published by Historians of Netherlandish Art: https://hnanews.org/ Republication Guidelines: https://jhna.org/republication-guidelines/ Notes: This PDF is provided for reference purposes only and may not contain all the functionality or features of the original, online publication. This PDF provides paragraph numbers as well as page numbers for citation purposes. ISSN: 1949-9833 JHNA 7:2 (Summer 2015) 1 LIGHT AND SIGHT IN TER BRUGGHEN’S MAN WRITING BY CANDLELIGHT Susan Donahue Kuretsky Ter Brugghen’s Man Writing by Candlelight is commonly seen as a vanitas tronie of an old man with a flickering candle. Reconsideration of the figure’s age and activity raises another possibility, for the image’s pointed connection between light and sight and the fact that the figure has just signed the artist’s signature and is now completing the date suggests that ter Brugghen—like others who elevated the role of the artist in his period—was more interested in conveying the enduring aliveness of the artistic process and its outcome than in reminding the viewer about the transience of life. DOI:10.5092/jhna.2017.9.1.4 Fig. 1 Hendrick ter Brugghen, Man Writing by Candlelight, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Year in Review for Dealers
    Year in Review For Dealers Anthropology…………………........ 1 Guidance & Counseling…… 28 Area Studies……………………….. 2 Health……………………… 28 Art & Architecture…………………... 7 History…………………….. 31 Biology……………………………... 13 Mathematics……………….. 36 Business & Economics……………… 15 Music & Dance……………... 37 Careers & Job Search……………… 18 Philosophy & Religion…….. 37 Communication…………………..... 18 Physical Science…………… 38 Criminal Justice…………………..... 19 Political Science……………. 39 Earth Science……………………...... 20 Psychology………………… 41 Education………………………….. 21 Sociology…………………... 43 Engineering…………….…….......... 22 Sports & Fitness…………….. 46 English & Language Arts………...... 24 Technical Education……….. 46 Environmental Science…………...... 24 Technology & Society………. 46 Family & Consumer Sciences……… 27 World Languages…………... 49 Free Preview Clips Online! www.films.com/dealers T: (800) 257-5126, x4270 • F: (212) 564-1332 Anthropology 8th Fire Item # 58430 The Himbas are Shooting Subject: Anthropology This is a provocative, high-energy journey Item # 54408 through Aboriginal country showing why we Subject: Anthropology need to fix Canada's 500-year-old relationship with Indigenous In Namibia, a group of Himbas men and peoples—a relationship mired in colonialism, conflict, and denial. women of all ages have decided to make a film (4 parts, 180 minutes) showing who they are and what their life is like: incorporating key © 2012 • $679.80 • ISBN: 978-0-81608-535-4 moments in their history, daily life, ceremonies, and ancestral ties, Indigenous In the City: 8th Fire the attractions
    [Show full text]
  • De Proto-Örientaalse Puzzel: Op Zoek Naar Exotische Invloeden in De Nederlandse Historieschilderkunst Van 1520-50
    De proto-örientaalse puzzel: Op zoek naar exotische invloeden in de Nederlandse historieschilderkunst van 1520-50 Door Jeroen Lesuis Met medewerking van Hilbert Lootsma Schoorl, Haarlem, Amsterdam, Keulen, Obervellach, Bazel, Venetië, Malta, Rhodos, Bethlehem en Jeruzalem, dit zijn plaatsen die schilder Jan van Scorel (1495-62) in zijn eerste vijfentwintig levensjaren aandoet.1 In dit rijtje hoort uiteraard ook thuis Rome, waar Scorel na zijn Jeruzalem- pelgrimsreis twee jaar verblijft. Als een van de eerste schilders uit de Nederlanden en vele na hem. De door hem bewonderde werken van Michelangelo en Rafael zullen een niet te onderschatten impact hebben op Scorels werk. Maar dat is niet waar dit artikel zich op focust. De interesse gaat juist uit naar het gegeven dat Scorel het letterlijk verder zocht dan het in zijn tijd geadoreerde Italië. Daarin was hij niet de enige uitzondering. Zijn collega Pieter Coecke van Aelst (1502-50) bevond zich in 1533 in Istanbul, proberend om tapijtontwerpen te verkopen aan de Ottomaanse sultan Süleyman.2 Jan Cornelisz. Vermeyen (1500-59) bevond zich in 1535 tussen de Tunesische koppensnellers toen hij namens Karel V al schilderend verslag deed van diens strijd tegen de Ottomaanse admiraal Barbossa.3 Het lijkt er op dat de pioniersgeest die rondwaarde in de wereld (Columbus die in 1492 voet zet op Amerikaanse bodem, Cortés die in 1519 in Mexico arriveert) ook vat had gekregen op de zestiende-eeuwse schilders uit de Nederlanden. De vraag is welke invloed dit had op hun werk. De onderzoeksvraag waar dit artikel zich op richt is als volgt: welke proto-oriëntaalse invloeden zijn terug te vinden in de Nederlandse historieschilderkunst aangaande de periode 1520- 50? Hierbij is gekozen voor het begrip ‘proto-oriëntalisme’ in plaats van ‘exotisme’ (al zal dit laatste soms als synoniem functioneren) omdat dit preciezer definieert wat de vreemde beeldelementen vertegenwoordigen.
    [Show full text]
  • MARCH 2017 O.XXV No
    PQ-COVER 2017.qxp_PQ-COVER MASTER-2007 27/10/2016 15:16 Page 1 P Q PRINT QUARTERLY MARCH 2017 Vol. XXXIV No. 1 March 2017 VOLUME XXXIV NUMBER 1 PQ.JAN17.IFC and IBC.qxp_Layout 1 02/02/2017 16:05 Page 1 PQ.MARCH 2017.qxp_Layout 1 02/02/2017 14:55 Page 1 pRint QuARteRly Volume xxxiV numBeR 1 mARch 2017 contents A proposed intaglio Addition to leonhard Beck’s printed oeuvre 3 BARBARA Butts And mARJoRie B. cohn lelio orsi, Antonio pérez and The Minotaur Before a Broken Labyrinth 11 RhodA eitel-poRteR cornelis Galle i Between Genoa and Antwerp 20 JAmie GABBARelli Franz christoph von scheyb on the Art of engraving 32 thomAs FRAnGenBeRG the drypoints of B. J. o. nordfeldt 42 Julie mellBy notes 53 catalogue and Book Reviews max Klinger 97 Giorgio morandi 104 JeAnnette stoscheK Amy WoRthen m. c. escher 101 marcel duchamp’s Boîte-en-valise 111 √tim o’Riley √stephen J. BuRy R. B. Kitaj 113 AlexAndeR AdAms PQ.MARCH 2017.qxp_Layout 1 02/02/2017 14:55 Page 2 editor Rhoda eitel-porter Administrator sub-editor chris Riches Virginia myers editorial Board clifford Ackley pat Gilmour Jean michel massing david Alexander Antony Griffiths mark mcdonald Judith Brodie craig hartley nadine orenstein michael Bury martin hopkinson peter parshall paul coldwell david Kiehl maxime préaud marzia Faietti Fritz Koreny christian Rümelin Richard Field david landau michael snodin celina Fox Ger luijten ellis tinios david Freedberg Giorgio marini henri Zerner members of print Quarterly publications Registered charity no. 1007928 chairman Antony Griffiths* david Alexander* michael Kauffmann nicolas Barker* david landau* david Bindman* Jane martineau* Graham Brown marilyn perry Fabio castelli tom Rassieur douglas druick pierre Rosenberg Rhoda eitel-porter Alan stone Jan piet Filedt Kok dave Williams david Freedberg henri Zerner George Goldner *directors Between november 1984 and november 1987 Print Quarterly was published in association with the J.
    [Show full text]
  • PROVISIONAL PROGRAM HNA Conference 2022
    PROVISIONAL PROGRAM HNA Conference 2022 Amsterdam and The Hague, Netherlands HNA CONFERENCE 2022 Amsterdam and The Hague 2-4 June 2022 Program committee: Stijn Bussels, Leiden University (chair) Edwin Buijsen, Mauritshuis Suzanne Laemers, RKD – Netherlands Institute for Art History Judith Noorman, University of Amsterdam Gabri van Tussenbroek, University of Amsterdam | City of Amsterdam Abbie Vandivere, Mauritshuis and University of Amsterdam KEYNOTE LECTURES ClauDia Swan, Washington University A Taste for Piracy in the Dutch Republic 1 The global baroque world was a world of goods. Transoceanic trade routes compounded travel over land for commercial gain, and the distribution of wares took on global dimensions. Precious metals, spices, textiles, and, later, slaves were among the myriad commodities transported from west to east and in some cases back again. Taste followed trade—or so the story tends to be told. This lecture addresses the traffic in global goods in the Dutch world from a different perspective—piracy. “A Taste for Piracy in the Dutch Republic” will present and explore exemplary narratives of piracy and their impact and, more broadly, the contingencies of consumption and taste- making as the result of politically charged violence. Inspired by recent scholarship on ships, shipping, maritime pictures, and piracy this lecture offers a new lens onto the culture of piracy as well as the material goods obtained by piracy, and how their capture informed new patterns of consumption in the Dutch Republic. Jan Blanc, University of Geneva Dutch Seventeenth Century or Dutch Golden Age? Words, concepts and ideology Historians of seventeenth-century Dutch art have long been accustomed to studying not only works of art and artists, but also archives and textual sources.
    [Show full text]