A Strong Governance Structure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Strong Governance Structure CHAIRMAN’S INTRODUCTION TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE A strong governance structure COVID-19 response Since the World Health Organisation declared the COVID-19 virus a pandemic back in March 2020, the hospitality industry has been presented with a unique set of challenges. During this time, we have taken a number of steps to ensure the safety of our customers and employees, while also supporting and leading management as they seek to make rapid decisions in an uncertain and challenging time in the industry. It was important to the Board that the decisions made during this time aligned with the Company’s purpose and values while also supporting our long-term growth strategy and practising good governance. In particular the Board closely reviewed health and safety arrangements for teams and guests and had a close involvement in the rights issue, the Green Bonds issuance, changes to Whitbread's revolving credit facilities and negotiations with the pension fund Trustee. The Executive Committee began meeting daily by video conference and twice a month for more formal meetings, also via video conference. This ensured we were available to respond rapidly to the ever-changing restrictions issued by the UK Government at its daily press briefings. The Board was provided with regular updates following these meetings. ADAM CROZIER CHAIRMAN In addition to this, the Company established the COVID-19 Working Group to ensure the effective operation of our business within the constraints of the restrictions issued in the UK and Ireland. The party consists of representatives from all functions of the business and meets on a weekly basis. I am pleased to present the Board’s The swift response from our Board, Executive Committee and management team demonstrate the strength of the Group's report on the Company’s compliance strategy, risk management and leadership, while also providing with the UK Corporate Governance an insight of our dedication to maintaining strong governance. Further information on our overall response to the COVID-19 Code. This year has been an extremely pandemic can be found on pages 4 and 5. uncertain period as a result of the Our strong governance framework The Board's primary objective is to create and maintain COVID-19 pandemic. The Board a strong governance structure in order to support the long- term success of the business and also generate lasting value remains committed and focused on for all our stakeholders. At Whitbread, we are committed to driving forward a strong corporate ensuring the Company's actions are in keeping with our culture, values and strategic goals. This is achieved by understanding governance framework, while the critical role that strong corporate governance plays. also taking the necessary steps to In last year’s corporate governance report we provided our first full review on our compliance with the 2018 Code. The new code successfully navigate Whitbread provided the Board with an opportunity to reassess what good corporate governance meant to us and provides a new standard through these unprecedented times. against which we measure ourselves. We continue to focus our governance on complying with the new provisions and applying the new principles introduced in this code. We hope to demonstrate throughout this report the Board’s emphasis on issues such as Company purpose, culture, strategy and the relationships with shareholders and stakeholders. With the exception of one provision, which is explained in more detail below, I am pleased to report that we have complied with the Code throughout the 2020/21 financial year. In the pages that follow we have set out how we have complied with the principles set out in the Code. 68 Whitbread Annual Report and Accounts 2020/21 Strategic reportStrategic The one provision that we cannot report full compliance with On 1 March 2021 the Board was pleased to welcome Fumbi Governance this year is the new provision requiring that pension contribution Chima and Kal Atwal as new independent non-executive rates for executive directors should be aligned with those directors fulfilling the need recognised in last year’s Board available to the workforce. As discussed in last year’s report, evaluation for technology and digital experience. Fumbi is we are taking steps to bring us closer in line. The remuneration skilled in digital transformation strategy in high-growth policy, approved in December 2019, is phasing the pension environments, with a great understanding of overall strategic contribution of current executive directors by 10% from 25% to planning and technology. Kal has a substantial amount of statements Financial 15% over a period of three years. The provision for new executive digital and marketing experience; she played a central part directors was also reduced to 10%, which aligns with the in driving strategic growth and scaling of the business in her workforce. We are committed to aligning contribution rates previous role. Fumbi and Kal bring an invaluable mix of skills and will further review at the end of the policy period. and will provide a breadth of knowledge to the Board. Further information on our executive pensions can be found in As a Board, we believe we have put in place a strong non-executive the remuneration report on page 89. team with a wide range of skills, knowledge and experience to help assist the Company in pursuing its strategic objectives. Culture and purpose Whitbread’s culture is underpinned by ensuring that our Board evaluation Other information customers have a great experience, which we call the It was highlighted in last year's Board evaluation that directors ‘Customer Heartbeat’, comprising: wanted to focus on succession planning and diversifying Board experience. As mentioned above, there was exciting › Winning Teams; progress in this area with the appointment of two new › Profitable Growth; non-executive directors joining the Board in March. However, succession planning has become less of a priority during the › Force for Good; and exceptional year we have experienced. › Everyday Efficiency. The Board and its main committees participated in an internal This aligns with our purpose of providing sustainable long- evaluation during the current year. The results of the review term value for our shareholders while delivering a quality and have produced some opportunities for improvement, and value for money hotel experience to our customers. We aim to a refocus of recommendations made in last year's evaluation: follow Whitbread’s key values of being genuine, confident and › Further focus on succession planning for the CEO, executive committed to reach our goal of becoming the best budget directors and wider senior leadership teams. hotel business in the world. This is accomplished by ensuring our teams are happy and engaged through training and › Emphasis on training and development. progression opportunities and by continuing to develop › Evolving the strategy for a post-COVID world and our sustainability programme under Force for Good with exploration of how technology can be used to support this. the intention of enabling everyone to live and work well. Overall, the results were very positive. They were reported to The Board usually assesses and monitors the Company’s the Board by the Company Secretary in March and discussed culture by making regular visits to Whitbread’s hotels and thoroughly to ensure a full understanding. restaurants and taking the opportunity to meet and speak to team members. Unfortunately, this has not been possible this Further information on the Board evaluation and areas for year but the Board is excited to get back into the business focus in the year ahead can be found on page 76. when it's safe to do so. The Board relies on the regular reports Our stakeholders from the executive team, particularly the Chief Executive and The Board has always ensured that it considers the impact of its the Group HR Director, both of whom are members of the decisions on all our various stakeholders, but even more so now Board. The Group HR Director provides input specifically on following the recent focus on s172. It is important to understand employee issues, employee satisfaction surveys, which include the views of our stakeholders in order to build constructive questions on culture, and reports from the Employee Forum. relationships. For example, we consider the views of our wider Culture is also addressed at the strategy day, and through workforce through the use of the Whitbread Employee Forum recruitment decisions to senior positions, including for the new and 'Our Voice' representatives which gives our employees HR Director, where cultural fit was discussed by the Board. an opportunity to shape strategic plans and major decisions. The Board has re-committed to the purpose as being fit for In addition to this, as Chairman I hold governance meetings the current environment. Regular reports are produced for the each year with major shareholders to listen to their views and Board by functions across the Group to enable the Board to any issues they may have. satisfy itself that the purpose its being met. Further information on our stakeholder engagement can be The Board found on pages 56 and 57. The Board is committed to regularly reviewing the skills, experience and knowledge that it has in place as well as those that can be added. It is part of the Nomination Committee’s role to regularly review the structure, size and composition of the Board. This helps ensure there is a balance of skills, knowledge, independence and diversity around the table. Adam Crozier In April 2021, Susan Taylor Martin retired from the Board after Chairman completing nine years. Deanna Oppenheimer also stepped 26 April 2021 down from the Board in December 2020. Whitbread Annual Report and Accounts 2020/21 69 CHAIRMAN’S INTRODUCTION TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 The UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 is the standard against which we measure ourselves.
Recommended publications
  • Parker Review
    Ethnic Diversity Enriching Business Leadership An update report from The Parker Review Sir John Parker The Parker Review Committee 5 February 2020 Principal Sponsor Members of the Steering Committee Chair: Sir John Parker GBE, FREng Co-Chair: David Tyler Contents Members: Dr Doyin Atewologun Sanjay Bhandari Helen Mahy CBE Foreword by Sir John Parker 2 Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE Foreword by the Secretary of State 6 Trevor Phillips OBE Message from EY 8 Tom Shropshire Vision and Mission Statement 10 Yvonne Thompson CBE Professor Susan Vinnicombe CBE Current Profile of FTSE 350 Boards 14 Matthew Percival FRC/Cranfield Research on Ethnic Diversity Reporting 36 Arun Batra OBE Parker Review Recommendations 58 Bilal Raja Kirstie Wright Company Success Stories 62 Closing Word from Sir Jon Thompson 65 Observers Biographies 66 Sanu de Lima, Itiola Durojaiye, Katie Leinweber Appendix — The Directors’ Resource Toolkit 72 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Thanks to our contributors during the year and to this report Oliver Cover Alex Diggins Neil Golborne Orla Pettigrew Sonam Patel Zaheer Ahmad MBE Rachel Sadka Simon Feeke Key advisors and contributors to this report: Simon Manterfield Dr Manjari Prashar Dr Fatima Tresh Latika Shah ® At the heart of our success lies the performance 2. Recognising the changes and growing talent of our many great companies, many of them listed pool of ethnically diverse candidates in our in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250. There is no doubt home and overseas markets which will influence that one reason we have been able to punch recruitment patterns for years to come above our weight as a medium-sized country is the talent and inventiveness of our business leaders Whilst we have made great strides in bringing and our skilled people.
    [Show full text]
  • FTSE Factsheet
    FTSE COMPANY REPORT Share price analysis relative to sector and index performance Data as at: 27 March 2020 Brand Architekts Group BAR Personal Goods — GBP 1.2 at close 27 March 2020 Absolute Relative to FTSE UK All-Share Sector Relative to FTSE UK All-Share Index PERFORMANCE 21-Apr-2015 1D WTD MTD YTD Absolute - - - - Rel.Sector - - - - Rel.Market - - - - VALUATION Data unavailable Trailing PE 8.1 EV/EBITDA 7.5 PB 1.1 PCF 3.8 Div Yield 3.9 Price/Sales 1.5 Net Debt/Equity 0.1 Div Payout 31.4 ROE 13.5 DESCRIPTION Data unavailable The principal activities of the is a market leader in the development, formulation, and supply of personal care and beauty products. See final page and http://www.londonstockexchange.com/prices-and-markets/stocks/services-stock/ftse-note.htm for further details. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please see the final page for important legal disclosures. 1 of 4 FTSE COMPANY REPORT: Brand Architekts Group 27 March 2020 Valuation Metrics Price to Earnings (PE) EV to EBITDA Price to Book (PB) 28-Feb-2020 28-Feb-2020 28-Feb-2020 80 25 6 70 5 20 60 4 50 15 +1SD +1SD +1SD 40 3 10 Avg 30 Avg Avg 2 20 5 -1SD 1 -1SD 10 -1SD 0 0 0 Mar-2015 Mar-2016 Mar-2017 Mar-2018 Mar-2019 Mar-2015 Mar-2016 Mar-2017 Mar-2018 Mar-2019 Mar-2015 Mar-2016 Mar-2017 Mar-2018 Mar-2019 PZ Cussons 29.7 Watches of Switzerland Group 14.6 Watches of Switzerland Group 10.3 Burberry Group 20.0 Unilever 11.2 Unilever 8.7 Personal Goods 19.5 Personal Goods 11.1 Personal Goods 7.9 Unilever 19.1 Burberry Group 10.7 Burberry Group 4.7 Brand
    [Show full text]
  • N5925 Cover 99
    WHITBREAD PLC ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 1998/9 ANNUAL REPORT OUR BUSINESSES ARE POSITIONED IN MARKETS WHERE GROWTH IS DRIVEN BY WELL-ESTABLISHED CONSUMER TRENDS. IN ADDITION, MANAGEMENT HAS TAKEN FURTHER ACTION TO STRENGTHEN THE CONSUMER APPEAL OF OUR BRANDS, PARTICULARLY THROUGH ENHANCED CUSTOMER SERVICE, AND REMAINS FOCUSED ON IMPROVING RETURNS THROUGH INCREASED EFFICIENCY. CONTENTS 2 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 4CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT 5 COMPANY OVERVIEW 6 OPERATING AND FINANCE REVIEW 14BOARD OF DIRECTORS 16 DIRECTORS’ REPORT 18 – CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 20 – REMUNERATION REPORT This document contains detailed financial and statutory information and constitutes Whitbread PLC’s annual report and accounts for 1998/9. The company also publishes a shorter document, the Whitbread annual review, which aims to give private shareholders a good overview of the company’s results and activities. 26 STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ 32 BALANCE SHEETS RESPONSIBILITIES 33 CASH FLOW STATEMENT 27 REPORT OF THE AUDITORS 34 NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS 28 ACCOUNTING POLICIES 56 FIVE YEAR SUMMARY 30 GROUP PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT 58 GLOSSARY 31 STATEMENT OF TOTAL RECOGNISED GAINS 60 SHAREHOLDER SERVICES AND LOSSES 31 HISTORICAL COST PROFITS AND LOSSES 2 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS SEGMENTAL TURNOVER ANALYSIS 1998/9 Beer Pub Partnerships Inns Restaurants Hotels Sports, health and fitness Other drinks TURNOVER INCLUDING JOINT VENTURES (£m) PROFIT BEFORE EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS AND TAX (£m) 3,313 3,410 3,131 354.8 365.3 2,840 316.5 2,556 283.1 255.1 1994/5 1995/6 1996/7 1997/8 1998/9 1994/5 1995/6 1996/7 1997/8 1998/9 WHITBREAD PLC ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 3 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS SEGMENTAL PROFIT ANALYSIS 1998/9 Beer Pub Partnerships Inns Restaurants Hotels Sports, health and fitness Other drinks TO HAVE ACHIEVED A 4.6% INCREASE IN ADJUSTED EARNINGS PER SHARE IN DIFFICULT MARKET CONDITIONS WAS A CREDITABLE PERFORMANCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2017 Accounts and Report Annual the Future of Learning
    Pearson Annual report and accounts 2017 The future of learning Pearson Annual report and accounts 2017 In this report Strategic report 01 Overview 22 Efficacy 02 Our KPIs 24 Sustainability 04 About Pearson 06 Chairman’s introduction 34 Our performance 08 CEO’s strategic overview 34 Financial review 42 Operating performance 12 Our strategy in action 48 Risk management 12 Market trends 50 Principal risks and uncertainties 13 Our strategy Governance Financial statements 62 Governance overview 112 Independent auditor’s report to the members 64 Leadership and effectiveness of Pearson plc 76 Accountability 118 Group accounts 86 Engagement 178 Parent company accounts 90 Remuneration 190 Five-year summary 106 Additional disclosures 192 Financial key performance indicators 110 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities 196 Shareholder information BC Principal offices worldwide Helping create the future of learning In this report we have included employee interviews from around our business to showcase how Pearson’s people are helping create the future of learning. CC Cedrick Collomb 19 IS Indika Senadhira 33 Senior Vice President for Senior Manager, Software Global Product Technology Engineering, Pearson Technology Delivery Centre KE Kate Edwards 23 AC Alvaro Castro 41 Senior Vice President Product Management Analyst, Efficacy & Research Pearson Test of English Strategy and performance reporting The was approved for issue by the Board on strategic report up to and including p60 is 14 March 2018 and signed on its behalf by: formed of three sections: ‘Overview’, ‘Our strategy in action’ and ‘Our performance’, and Coram Williams Chief Financial Officer Section 1 Overview 01 At Pearson we have a clear mission: to help people make progress in their lives through learning.
    [Show full text]
  • A Leading Multi-Channel, International Retailer 2011 Highlights
    Debenhams Annual Report and Accounts 2011 A leading multi-channel, international retailer 2011 highlights Financial highlights* Gross transaction value £2.7bn +4.5% Revenue £2.2bn +4.2% Headline profit before tax £166.1m +10.0% Basic earnings per share 9.1p +21 . 3% Dividend per share 3.0p *All numbers calculated on 53 week basis Operational highlights • Market share growth in most key categories: women’s casualwear, menswear, childrenswear and premium health & beauty • Strong multi-channel growth; online GTV up 73.8% to £180.4 million1 • Excellent performance from Magasin du Nord: EBITDA up 141.1% to £13.5m2 • Sales in international franchise stores up 16.5% to £77.0m1 • Three new UK stores opened, creating 350 new jobs • Eleven store modernisations undertaken • New ranges including Edition, Diamond by Julien Macdonald and J Jeans for Men by Jasper Conran • “Life Made Fabulous” marketing campaign introduced 1 53 weeks to 3 September 2011 2 53 weeks to 3 September 2011 vs 42 weeks to 28 August 2010 Welcome Overview Overview p2 2 Chairman’s statement 4 Market overview 6 2011 performance Chief Executive’s review New Chief Executive p8 Michael Sharp reviews the past year and sets the Strategic review strategy going forward Strategic review p8 8 Chief Executive’s review 11 Setting a clear strategy for growth 12 Focusing on UK retail 16 Delivering a compelling customer proposition 20 Multi-channel Focusing on UK retail 24 International Improving and widening Finance review p12 the brand in the UK Finance review p28 28 Finance Director’s review
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1: Parker Review Survey Results As at 2 November 2020
    Annex 1: Parker Review survey results as at 2 November 2020 The data included in this table is a representation of the survey results as at 2 November 2020, which were self-declared by the FTSE 100 companies. As at March 2021, a further seven FTSE 100 companies have appointed directors from a minority ethnic group, effective in the early months of this year. These companies have been identified through an * in the table below. 3 3 4 4 2 2 Company Company 1 1 (source: BoardEx) Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did 1 Admiral Group PLC a 27 Hargreaves Lansdown PLC a 2 Anglo American PLC a 28 Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC a 3 Antofagasta PLC a 29 HSBC Holdings PLC a InterContinental Hotels 30 a 4 AstraZeneca PLC a Group PLC 5 Avast PLC a 31 Intermediate Capital Group PLC a 6 Aveva PLC a 32 Intertek Group PLC a 7 B&M European Value Retail S.A. a 33 J Sainsbury PLC a 8 Barclays PLC a 34 Johnson Matthey PLC a 9 Barratt Developments PLC a 35 Kingfisher PLC a 10 Berkeley Group Holdings PLC a 36 Legal & General Group PLC a 11 BHP Group PLC a 37 Lloyds Banking Group PLC a 12 BP PLC a 38 Melrose Industries PLC a 13 British American Tobacco PLC a 39 Mondi PLC a 14 British Land Company PLC a 40 National Grid PLC a 15 BT Group PLC a 41 NatWest Group PLC a 16 Bunzl PLC a 42 Ocado Group PLC a 17 Burberry Group PLC a 43 Pearson PLC a 18 Coca-Cola HBC AG a 44 Pennon Group PLC a 19 Compass Group PLC a 45 Phoenix Group Holdings PLC a 20 Diageo PLC a 46 Polymetal International PLC a 21 Experian PLC a 47
    [Show full text]
  • Ftse4good UK 50
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE4Good UK 50 Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Group 0.81 UNITED GlaxoSmithKline 5.08 UNITED Rentokil Initial 0.67 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Anglo American 2.56 UNITED Halma 0.74 UNITED Rio Tinto 4.68 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Antofagasta 0.36 UNITED HSBC Hldgs 6.17 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell A 4.3 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.56 UNITED InterContinental Hotels Group 0.64 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell B 3.75 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AstraZeneca 8.25 UNITED International Consolidated Airlines 0.47 UNITED Schroders 0.28 UNITED KINGDOM Group KINGDOM KINGDOM Aviva 1.15 UNITED Intertek Group 0.65 UNITED Segro 0.95 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Barclays 2.1 UNITED Legal & General Group 1.1 UNITED Smith & Nephew 0.99 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BHP Group Plc 3.2 UNITED Lloyds Banking Group 2.39 UNITED Smurfit Kappa Group 0.74 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BT Group 1.23 UNITED London Stock Exchange Group 2.09 UNITED Spirax-Sarco Engineering 0.72 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Burberry Group 0.6 UNITED Mondi 0.67 UNITED SSE 1.13 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Coca-Cola HBC AG 0.37 UNITED National Grid 2.37 UNITED Standard Chartered 0.85 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Compass Group 1.96 UNITED Natwest Group 0.77 UNITED Tesco 1.23 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM CRH 2.08 UNITED Next 0.72 UNITED Unilever 7.99 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Deferred Shares Progress Review
    The Purposeful Company Study on Deferred Shares Progress Review The Purposeful Company Steering Group September 2020 1 About The Purposeful Company This study was overseen by the Steering Committee of The Purposeful Company. The Purposeful Company was established in 2015 with the support of the Bank of England to identify changes to policy and practice to help transform British business with purposeful companies committed to creating long-term value through serving the needs of society. The Purposeful Company has published extensively on Executive Pay, Corporate Governance, and Investor Stewardship, liaising closely with all main policy-making bodies during the governance reforms of recent years. The Steering Committee comprises: • Clare Chapman: Co-Chair of The Purposeful Company; Non-executive Director of the Weir Group, G4S plc and Heidrick & Struggles Inc; Chair of Acas • Will Hutton: London School of Economics and Co-Chair of The Purposeful Company; former Principal of Hertford College, Oxford • Professor Alex Edmans: London Business School and Gresham College • Dr Tom Gosling: London Business School and formerly Partner at PwC • Professor Colin Mayer MBE: Saïd Business School and The British Academy Primary accountability for oversight of the report is held by Clare Chapman and Tom Gosling. All Steering Group members are acting in their personal capacity, not representing the organisations listed. Any views expressed are those of the Steering Committee and cannot be attributed to any other organisation with which a Steering Committee member has affiliation. The research and report authorship have been led by Jean-Pierre Noël. Jean- Pierre was formerly the Group Reward Director inside two FTSE-50 multinationals, and now runs his own reward consulting and talent development business as part of a portfolio career.
    [Show full text]
  • Constituents & Weights
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE 100 Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Group 0.59 UNITED GlaxoSmithKline 3.7 UNITED RELX 1.88 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Admiral Group 0.35 UNITED Glencore 1.97 UNITED Rentokil Initial 0.49 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Anglo American 1.86 UNITED Halma 0.54 UNITED Rightmove 0.29 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Antofagasta 0.26 UNITED Hargreaves Lansdown 0.32 UNITED Rio Tinto 3.41 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Ashtead Group 1.26 UNITED Hikma Pharmaceuticals 0.22 UNITED Rolls-Royce Holdings 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.41 UNITED HSBC Hldgs 4.5 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell A 3.13 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AstraZeneca 6.02 UNITED Imperial Brands 0.77 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell B 2.74 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Auto Trader Group 0.32 UNITED Informa 0.4 UNITED Royal Mail 0.28 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Avast 0.14 UNITED InterContinental Hotels Group 0.46 UNITED Sage Group 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aveva Group 0.23 UNITED Intermediate Capital Group 0.31 UNITED Sainsbury (J) 0.24 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aviva 0.84 UNITED International Consolidated Airlines 0.34 UNITED Schroders 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM Group KINGDOM KINGDOM B&M European Value Retail 0.27 UNITED Intertek Group 0.47 UNITED Scottish Mortgage Inv Tst 1 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BAE Systems 0.89 UNITED ITV 0.25 UNITED Segro 0.69 UNITED KINGDOM
    [Show full text]
  • The Language of Corporate Code of Ethics: an Industry-Related Perspective
    LEGALISTIC AND COMMITMENT- ORIENTED CORPORATE CODES OF ETHICS A CORPUS BASED ANALYSIS WH-QUESTIONS • WHAT? • WHO? • WHERE? • WHEN? • WHY? WHO: CODE ADOPTERS • first corporate codes appeared more then a century ago • 70% of the codes in the US were created after the year 1990 (Guillén et al. 2002) • Europe lagged behind the U.S. in 80s /‘90s (Kaptein/Wempe 1998) • Today 100% code adopters in US, UK and Europe, not in Asia (Cho-Kwai 2015) WHERE: WEBSITE SECTIONS • Corporate Governance • CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) • Other (“Who we are” / “About us”) formalizing behavioural standards (Weaver, 1993) WHEN 2018 8/17 2017 1/17 2016 2/17 2015 2/17 No date 3/17 WHY: REASONS FOR CODE ADOPTION Morally driven reasons ManagerialManagerial strategystrategy Morally driven reasons (ex. Stevens 2009) (es. Stevens 2009) linguistic analysis to unveil authors’ intentions RELEVANT LITERATURE -1 Codes investigated mostly by researchers of non-linguistic disciplines: - business ethics (ex.Stevens 2007, Scott 2002) - socio-psychology (ex. Fairfax 2007) - organizational studies (ex. Brown/Ainsworth/Grant 2012) - management studies (ex. Gillespie et al., 2012) RELEVANT LITERATURE -2 • Content analysis (ex. Krippendorff 2013) Other approaches: • perception of code users (Schwarts 2004) • physical appearance: length, visuals, format • code quality (Erwin 2011) led the way for language-focused research… PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY • CDA to help explain the role of managerial discourse in the construction of one of companies’ intangible asset corporate identity + automatic computer query to confirm HYPs RESEARCH QUESTIONS RQ ❶ Can we identify distinctive traits of legalistic approach and commitment-oriented approach at macro-textual level? RQ ❷ Are the two approaches industry-related? CORPUS • 17 codes from FTSE 100 constituents • 9 non-financial sectors (mining, media, food, tobacco, beverages, pharmaceuticals, aerospace & defense, oil & gas, personal goods) • 150,000 word tokens • 8,481 word types LEGALISTIC VS.
    [Show full text]
  • Ageing Workforce Causes Employers to Rethink Benefits Strategies
    www.employeebenefits.co.uk March 2014 I £6.95 ALIGNING REWARD WITH BUSINESS STRATEGY Legal bond Withers has personal touch in reward Hot 100 shine This year’s roll-call of the profession’s brightest stars Financial education supplement Guide staff towards a more secure future DOMINO EFFECT Ageing workforce causes employers to rethink benefi ts strategies EBC_0314 1 13/02/2014 15:45 noweVouchers available to order online 1) HIS CHILDHOOD DREAM WAS TO BE AN ANTIQUES DEALER 2) HE HAS A BLACK BELT IN KARATE THAT HE IS TOO SHY TO BRAG ABOUT 3) HE’D REALLY LIKE CORPORATE EYECARE BENEFITS Corporate eyecare is an important employee benefit, as well as a legal responsibility. So it shouldn’t surprise you that in a recent survey, the majority of employees considered it a valuable addition to their benefits package. With the brand new online vouchers from Specsavers, we believe the best value corporate eyecare scheme is now the easiest too. They still start from just £17 for a full eye test, a pair of VDU glasses (if required specifically and solely for VDU use) worth up to £45, and retinal screening for the over-40s or when recommended by your optometrist. But now you can simply order and pay for eVouchers online and email them direct to your staff, saving you all time and paperwork. What’s more, you’ll automatically get detailed feedback on whoever’s redeemed an eVoucher, such as their retest dates and VDU requirements, at no extra charge. Not only that but your staff can still save £20 on their own glasses purchases, too.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABILITY BOND FRAMEWORK August 2020
    SUSTAINABILITY BOND FRAMEWORK August 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUSTAINABILITY AT BURBERRY ............................................................................................. 3 RATIONALE FOR ISSUANCE ..................................................................................................... 12 ALIGNMENT WITH THE SUSTANABILITY BOND GUIDELINES .................................. 12 USE OF PROCEEDS .................................................................................................................. 12 ELIGIBLE SUSTAINABLE PROJECTS ................................................................................ 13 PROCESS FOR PROJECT EVALUATION AND SELECTION ....................................... 13 MANAGEMENT OF PROCEEDS ........................................................................................... 14 REPORTING ................................................................................................................................. 14 EXTERNAL REVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 14 2 INTRODUCTION Burberry Group plc (“Burberry”) is a leading luxury brand, headquartered in London, offering men’s, women’s and children’s clothing, accessories, fragrance and beauty products which are distributed across (i) retail, (ii) wholesale, and (iii) digital channels. Burberry’s principal activities consist of design, sourcing, manufacturing, wholesaling, retailing and licensing activities. Burberry is listed on the London
    [Show full text]