DOCSLIB.ORG

BIO 113 Dinosaurs SG

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BIO 113 Dinosaurs SG Request for General Studies Designation for: BIO 113 — Dinosaurs Course Description: Principles of evolution, ecology, behavior, anatomy and physiology using dinosaurs and other extinct life as case studies. Geological processes and the fossil record. Can- not be used for major credit in the biological sciences. Fee. Included Documents: • Course Proposal Cover Form • Course Catalog Description (this page) • Criteria Checklist for General Studies SG designation, including descriptions of how the course meets the specific criteria • Proposed Course Syllabus • Table of contents (and preface) from the textbook (Fastovsky & Weishampel, 2nd ed.) • Selected lab handouts and worksheets Natural Sciences [SQ/SG] Page 4 Proposer: Please complete the following section and attach appropriate documentation. ASU--[SG] CRITERIA I. - FOR ALL GENERAL [SG] NATURAL SCIENCES CORE AREA COURSES, THE FOLLOWING ARE CRITICAL CRITERIA AND MUST BE MET: Identify YES NO Documentation Submitted Syllabus; Textbook 1. Course emphasizes the mastery of basic scientific principles table of contents; ✓ and concepts. specific lab handouts (see page 5 below) Syllabus; see page 5 below ✓ 2. Addresses knowledge of scientific method. Syllabus; Lab 3. Includes coverage of the methods of scientific inquiry that ✓ handouts; see page 6 characterize the particular discipline. below Syllabus; see page 6 ✓ 4. Addresses potential for uncertainty in scientific inquiry. below Syllabus; Lab 5. Illustrates the usefulness of mathematics in scientific handouts; see page 6 ✓ description and reasoning. below Syllabus: laboratory 6. Includes weekly laboratory and/or field sessions that provide schedule; see page 7 ✓ hands-on exposure to scientific phenomena and methodology below in the discipline, and enhance the learning of course material. Syllabus; Lab 7. Students submit written reports of laboratory experiments for ✓ worksheets; see page constructive evaluation by the instructor. 7 below 8. Course is general or introductory in nature, ordinarily at Syllabus; Textbook ✓ lower-division level; not a course with great depth or table of contents; see specificity. page 8 below II. - AT LEAST ONE OF THE ADDITIONAL CRITERIA THAT MUST BE MET WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE COURSE: See page 8 below ✓ A. Stresses understanding of the nature of basic scientific issues. See page 8 below B. Develops appreciation of the scope and reality of limitations ✓ in scientific capabilities. Only to a limited C. Discusses costs (time, human, financial) and risks of extent ✓ scientific inquiry. Natural Sciences [SQ/SG] Page 5 [SG] REQUIREMENTS CANNOT BE MET BY COURSES: • Presenting a qualitative survey of a discipline. • Focusing on the impact of science on social, economic, or environmental issues. • Focusing on a specific or limiting but in-depth theme suitable for upper-division majors. Course Prefix Number Title Designation BIO 113 Dinosaurs SG Explain in detail which student activities correspond to the specific designation criteria. Please use the following organizer to explain how the criteria are being met. Criteria (from How course meets spirit Please provide detailed evidence checksheet) (contextualize specific examples in of how course meets criteria (i.e., next column) where in syllabus) See lecture and lab schedules of The course will emphasize syllabus and table of contents of understanding evolutionary textbook. Labs will specifically principles including natural address the following: selection, adaptation, and stratigraphy and isotope dating phylogenetic relationships. (Lab 3); natural selection (with a Various other topics in animal simulation experiment), and phylogenetic analysis (Lab 4); 1. Course emphasizes biology will be explored as well, Species diversity and community the mastery of basic including basic principles of structure (Labs 5-6); allometry scientific principles anatomy and physiology (including and effects of size (Lab 13, and concepts. the relationship between diet and anatomy, adaptations for flight, though I plan on expanding this and thermoregulation), growth and lab). In addition, all of the labs and development, ecology, and focused on diversity ask students animal behavior (including social to provide adaptive interpretations behavior, parental care, and for morphology and relate the sexual selection). evolution of particular traits to phylogenies. Relevant lab handouts are attached. Week 1 of lecture schedule. The basic process of the scientific Laboratory worksheets will method is explicitly covered in the require students to formulate and lecture portion of the class; the adaptive and phylogenetic 2. Addresses knowledge scientific method is applied hypotheses. The field trip and of scientific method. throughout course as we ask how followup labs (Labs 5-6) will we our understanding of extinct involve students collecting data to organisms comes about and test specific hypotheses about the address specific controversies. distribution of fossil marine invertebrates. Page 5 Natural Sciences [SQ/SG] Page 6 Criteria (from How course meets spirit Please provide detailed evidence checksheet) (contextualize specific examples in of how course meets criteria (i.e., next column) where in syllabus) Stratigraphy and dating will be This course in is especially well investigated using real and suited for this, since we will simulated data to determine frequently ask how we know relative and absolute ages (Lab 3. Includes coverage of about various aspects of 3). Phylogenetic thinking (i.e., the methods of dinosaur biology. It will include evolutionary relationships) will scientific inquiry that how fossils are dated, how be introduced in lecture and characterize the exinct organisms are Lab 4, and emphasized in all particular discipline. reconstructed, how we subsequent labs. In Lab 8, determine evolutionary students compare tooth relationships, how we can measurements of dinosaurs & determine diet and lifestyles of modern animals to determine extinct organisms. probable diets. Relevant lab handouts are attached. Again, this course is especially well suited for addressing Lecture includes topics such as uncertainty, as there is much warm-blooded dinosaurs, we don’t and can’t know. Our social behavior and extinctions views of dinosaurs have where there is much debate. changed dramatically in the Lab worksheets ask students past decades, even the way to consider which aspects of they are reconstructed. the models are likely to be 4. Addresses potential Comparisons of traditional and well-supported by evidence for uncertainty in scientific inquiry. more modern views will be and which are more made extensively in lecture conjectural. The lab analyzing and to a lesser extent in lab (by the field-collected fossils for example comparing older includes very basic statistical and newer models). There will analysis for measuring also be substantial emphasis variation and comparisons. on distinguishing what is Relevant lab handouts are conjecture vs. what is known attached. more definitively. Quantitative approaches are Mathematical approaches will included in Labs 3 be used in phylogenetic (radioisotope problems), Lab 4 analysis, estimating the age of (natural selection and rocks (using half life decay), phylogenetic analysis), Lab 6 characterizing community (analysis of fossils collected on structure (based on fossils 5. Illustrates the field trip), Lab 8 (tooth shape usefulness of collected during field trip), comparisons as they relate to mathematics in descriptive statistics and basic diet), Lab 13 (estimation of scientific description hypothesis testing (using dinosaur mass by scaling from and reasoning graphs with standard errors), models and allometric extrapolating dinosaur mass relationships between body from scale models, and mass and leg size) and Lab 15 allometric relationships of (evolutionary changes in body size and other primate brain size). Relevant morphological characteristics. lab handouts are attached. Page 6 Natural Sciences [SQ/SG] Page 7 Criteria (from How course meets spirit Please provide detailed evidence checksheet) (contextualize specific examples in of how course meets criteria (i.e., next column) where in syllabus) Labs will meet every week, except for one week in which students take a self-guided tour and answer questions at the Arizona Museum of Natural See “Lab schedule” and History (which lets them “Assignments and grading” observe complete dinosaur sections of syllabus. skeletons and other fossils we 6. Includes weekly Techniques include field don’t have in lab). Hands on laboratory and/or excavations of invertebrate work will involve observations field sessions that fossils using defined plots, of actual fossils, fossil casts provide hands-on direct measurements (using exposure to scientific (replicas), field collection of calipers) of fossil, fossil phenomena and invertebrate fossils (near replicas, and modern animal methodology in the Payson, AZ), observations of specimens (e.g. Labs 5, 6, 8, discipline, and skeletons and skulls of living and 15), as well as enhance the learning species, as well as scale opportunities to directly of course material. models of extinct animals. handle various actual Even in the 3 labs involving invertebrate and vertebrate mostly scale models, students fossils and replicas. will be asked to think phylogenetically and to question the accuracy and validity of aspects of the models. Written reports include a lab 7. Students submit report that is completed at written reports of home using data collected on laboratory the field
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Paleontograph______
    __________The Paleontograph________ A newsletter for those interested in all aspects of Paleontology Volume 5 Issue 1 March, 2016 _________________________________________________________________ From Your Editor Welcome to our latest issue. I hope you enjoyed the holidays. If you are anything like me, you are looking forward to Spring. We've had a mild winter here in CO. Weather is different than the east coast. While the nights are colder, the days are warmer. It's a nice change for me. I finally have my fossil lab up and running and I am spending my days, or part thereof, working off my backlog of fossils. It has been a couple of months since our last issue but Bob has kept writing and so we have an interesting issue for you to enjoy. The Paleontograph was created in 2012 to continue what was originally the newsletter of The New Jersey Paleontological Society. The Paleontograph publishes articles, book reviews, personal accounts, and anything else that relates to Paleontology and fossils. Feel free to submit both technical and non-technical work. We try to appeal to a wide range of people interested in fossils. Articles about localities, specific types of fossils, fossil preparation, shows or events, museum displays, field trips, websites are all welcome. This newsletter is meant to be one by and for the readers. Issues will come out when there is enough content to fill an issue. I encourage all to submit contributions. It will be interesting, informative and fun to read. It can become whatever the readers and contributors want it to be, so it will be a work in progress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Endoskeletal Origin of the Turtle Carapace
    ARTICLE Received 7 Dec 2012 | Accepted 3 Jun 2013 | Published 9 Jul 2013 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3107 OPEN The endoskeletal origin of the turtle carapace Tatsuya Hirasawa1, Hiroshi Nagashima2 & Shigeru Kuratani1 The turtle body plan, with its solid shell, deviates radically from those of other tetrapods. The dorsal part of the turtle shell, or the carapace, consists mainly of costal and neural bony plates, which are continuous with the underlying thoracic ribs and vertebrae, respectively. Because of their superficial position, the evolutionary origins of these costo-neural elements have long remained elusive. Here we show, through comparative morphological and embryological analyses, that the major part of the carapace is derived purely from endos- keletal ribs. We examine turtle embryos and find that the costal and neural plates develop not within the dermis, but within deeper connective tissue where the rib and intercostal muscle anlagen develop. We also examine the fossils of an outgroup of turtles to confirm that the structure equivalent to the turtle carapace developed independently of the true osteoderm. Our results highlight the hitherto unravelled evolutionary course of the turtle shell. 1 Laboratory for Evolutionary Morphology, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe 650-0047, Japan. 2 Division of Gross Anatomy and Morphogenesis, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Niigata University, Niigata 951-8510, Japan. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to T.H. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 4:2107 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3107 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3107 wo types of skeletal systems are recognized in vertebrates, exoskeletal components into the costal and neural plates (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Impact of the End-Cretaceous Extinction on Lamniform Sharks
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Ecological impact of the end-Cretaceous extinction on lamniform sharks Rachel A. Belben1*, Charlie J. Underwood2, Zerina Johanson1, Richard J. Twitchett1 1 Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom, 2 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom * [email protected] Abstract a1111111111 Lamniform sharks are apex marine predators undergoing dramatic local and regional a1111111111 a1111111111 decline worldwide, with consequences for marine ecosystems that are difficult to predict. a1111111111 Through their long history, lamniform sharks have faced widespread extinction, and under- a1111111111 standing those `natural experiments' may help constrain predictions, placing the current cri- sis in evolutionary context. Here we show, using novel morphometric analyses of fossil shark teeth, that the end-Cretaceous extinction of many sharks had major ecological conse- quences. Post-extinction ecosystems supported lower diversity and disparity of lamniforms, OPEN ACCESS and were dominated by significantly smaller sharks with slimmer, smoother and less robust Citation: Belben RA, Underwood CJ, Johanson Z, teeth. Tooth shape is intimately associated with ecology, feeding and prey type, and by inte- Twitchett RJ (2017) Ecological impact of the end- grating data from extant sharks we show that latest Cretaceous sharks occupied similar Cretaceous extinction on lamniform sharks. PLoS niches to modern lamniforms, implying similar ecosystem structure and function. By com- ONE 12(6): e0178294. https://doi.org/10.1371/ parison, species in the depauperate post-extinction community occupied niches most simi- journal.pone.0178294 lar to those of juvenile sand tigers (Carcharias taurus). Our data show that quantitative tooth Editor: Matt Friedman, University of Michigan, morphometrics can distinguish lamniform sharks due to dietary differences, providing critical UNITED STATES insights into ecological consequences of past extinction episodes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Basal Ornithischia (Reptilia, Dinosauria)
    A PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE BASAL ORNITHISCHIA (REPTILIA, DINOSAURIA) Marc Richard Spencer A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2007 Committee: Margaret M. Yacobucci, Advisor Don C. Steinker Daniel M. Pavuk © 2007 Marc Richard Spencer All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Margaret M. Yacobucci, Advisor The placement of Lesothosaurus diagnosticus and the Heterodontosauridae within the Ornithischia has been problematic. Historically, Lesothosaurus has been regarded as a basal ornithischian dinosaur, the sister taxon to the Genasauria. Recent phylogenetic analyses, however, have placed Lesothosaurus as a more derived ornithischian within the Genasauria. The Fabrosauridae, of which Lesothosaurus was considered a member, has never been phylogenetically corroborated and has been considered a paraphyletic assemblage. Prior to recent phylogenetic analyses, the problematic Heterodontosauridae was placed within the Ornithopoda as the sister taxon to the Euornithopoda. The heterodontosaurids have also been considered as the basal member of the Cerapoda (Ornithopoda + Marginocephalia), the sister taxon to the Marginocephalia, and as the sister taxon to the Genasauria. To reevaluate the placement of these taxa, along with other basal ornithischians and more derived subclades, a phylogenetic analysis of 19 taxonomic units, including two outgroup taxa, was performed. Analysis of 97 characters and their associated character states culled, modified, and/or rescored from published literature based on published descriptions, produced four most parsimonious trees. Consistency and retention indices were calculated and a bootstrap analysis was performed to determine the relative support for the resultant phylogeny. The Ornithischia was recovered with Pisanosaurus as its basalmost member.
    [Show full text]
  • Lautenschlager 2012 Therizinosaur Brain
    Lautenschlager, S., Rayfield, E. J., Altangerel, P., & Witmer, L. M. (2012). The endocranial anatomy of Therizinosauria and its implications for sensory and cognitive function. PLoS ONE, 7(12), [e52289]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052289 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to published version (if available): 10.1371/journal.pone.0052289 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ The Endocranial Anatomy of Therizinosauria and Its Implications for Sensory and Cognitive Function Stephan Lautenschlager1*, Emily J. Rayfield1, Perle Altangerel2, Lindsay E. Zanno3,4, Lawrence M. Witmer5 1 School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, 2 National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 3 Nature Research Center, NC Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America, 4 Department of Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America, 5 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America Abstract Background: Therizinosauria is one of the most enigmatic and peculiar clades among theropod dinosaurs, exhibiting an unusual suite of characters, such as lanceolate teeth, a rostral rhamphotheca, long manual claws, and a wide, opisthopubic pelvis. This specialized anatomy has been associated with a shift in dietary preferences and an adaptation to herbivory.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Triassic) Adrian P
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/56 Definition and correlation of the Lamyan: A new biochronological unit for the nonmarine Late Carnian (Late Triassic) Adrian P. Hunt, Spencer G. Lucas, and Andrew B. Heckert, 2005, pp. 357-366 in: Geology of the Chama Basin, Lucas, Spencer G.; Zeigler, Kate E.; Lueth, Virgil W.; Owen, Donald E.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 56th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 456 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 2005 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Perinate and Eggs of a Giant Caenagnathid Dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Central China
    ARTICLE Received 29 Jul 2016 | Accepted 15 Feb 2017 | Published 9 May 2017 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14952 OPEN Perinate and eggs of a giant caenagnathid dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of central China Hanyong Pu1, Darla K. Zelenitsky2, Junchang Lu¨3, Philip J. Currie4, Kenneth Carpenter5,LiXu1, Eva B. Koppelhus4, Songhai Jia1, Le Xiao1, Huali Chuang1, Tianran Li1, Martin Kundra´t6 & Caizhi Shen3 The abundance of dinosaur eggs in Upper Cretaceous strata of Henan Province, China led to the collection and export of countless such fossils. One of these specimens, recently repatriated to China, is a partial clutch of large dinosaur eggs (Macroelongatoolithus) with a closely associated small theropod skeleton. Here we identify the specimen as an embryo and eggs of a new, large caenagnathid oviraptorosaur, Beibeilong sinensis. This specimen is the first known association between skeletal remains and eggs of caenagnathids. Caenagnathids and oviraptorids share similarities in their eggs and clutches, although the eggs of Beibeilong are significantly larger than those of oviraptorids and indicate an adult body size comparable to a gigantic caenagnathid. An abundance of Macroelongatoolithus eggs reported from Asia and North America contrasts with the dearth of giant caenagnathid skeletal remains. Regardless, the large caenagnathid-Macroelongatoolithus association revealed here suggests these dinosaurs were relatively common during the early Late Cretaceous. 1 Henan Geological Museum, Zhengzhou 450016, China. 2 Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4. 3 Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China. 4 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9. 5 Prehistoric Museum, Utah State University, 155 East Main Street, Price, Utah 84501, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana
    Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana By W. H. EASTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 A study of the stratigraphic and ecologic associa­ tions and significance offossils from the Big Snowy group of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows : Eastern, William Heyden, 1916- Carboniferous formations and faunas of central Montana. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1961. iv, 126 p. illus., diagrs., tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 348) Part of illustrative matter folded in pocket. Bibliography: p. 101-108. 1. Paleontology Montana. 2. Paleontology Carboniferous. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Carboniferous. I. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, B.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-__________________________________________ 1 Faunal analysis Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Faunal relations ______________________________ 22 Purposes of the study_ __________________________ 1 Long-ranging elements...__________________ 22 Organization of present work___ __________________ 3 Elements of Mississippian affinity.._________ 22 Acknowledgments--.-------.- ___________________
    [Show full text]
  • A Quantitative Study of Benthic Faunal Patterns Within the Pennsylvanian and Early Permian
    PALAIOS, 2006, v. 21, p. 316–324 Research Report DOI: 10.2110/palo.2005.P05-82e A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF BENTHIC FAUNAL PATTERNS WITHIN THE PENNSYLVANIAN AND EARLY PERMIAN NICOLE BONUSO* AND DAVID J. BOTTJER Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, 3651 Trousdale Parkway, Los Angeles, California, 90089-0740, USA e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT primary literature. Mudge and Yochelson’s (1962) monograph describes the stratigraphy and paleontology of the Pennsylvanian–Permian Mid- Using abundance data, this study explores quantitative patterns from continent of Kansas using over 300 fossil collections. Yancey and Stevens marine benthos, including implications for paleogeography, deposi- (1981) studied the Early Permian of Nevada and Utah extensively, re- tional environment, stratigraphic position, taxonomic groups (bra- corded abundance data from 55 localities, and identified paleocommun- chiopod or mollusc), substrate preferences, and ecological niches. ities based on the faunal comparisons and relative abundances within each Twenty-nine brachiopod- and bivalve-dominated fossil assemblages sample collected. As a result, three groups of commonly occurring com- from the Pennsylvanian and Early Permian of North and South Amer- munities emerged: (1) nearshore, mollusc-dominated; (2) open-shelf, non- ica, Thailand, and Australia were analyzed from carbonate-platform molluscan; and (3) deeper water, offshore mollusc-dominated. More re- environments; specifically, Nevada, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, cently, Olszewski and Patzkowsky (2001) documented the reoccurrence New Mexico, Venezuela, Kanchanaburi (Thailand), and Queensland of Pennsylvanian–Permian Midcontinent brachiopod and bivalve associ- (Australia). Samples were categorized by paleogeographic location, de- ations through time (Olszewski and Patzkowsky, 2001). Using a combi- positional environment, and age to help differentiate factors control- nation of data from Mudge and Yochelson (1962) and their own data, ling the faunal patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Caenagnathid Dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous Wangshi
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A new caenagnathid dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous Wangshi Group of Shandong, China, with Received: 12 October 2017 Accepted: 7 March 2018 comments on size variation among Published: xx xx xxxx oviraptorosaurs Yilun Yu1, Kebai Wang2, Shuqing Chen2, Corwin Sullivan3,4, Shuo Wang 5,6, Peiye Wang2 & Xing Xu7 The bone-beds of the Upper Cretaceous Wangshi Group in Zhucheng, Shandong, China are rich in fossil remains of the gigantic hadrosaurid Shantungosaurus. Here we report a new oviraptorosaur, Anomalipes zhaoi gen. et sp. nov., based on a recently collected specimen comprising a partial left hindlimb from the Kugou Locality in Zhucheng. This specimen’s systematic position was assessed by three numerical cladistic analyses based on recently published theropod phylogenetic datasets, with the inclusion of several new characters. Anomalipes zhaoi difers from other known caenagnathids in having a unique combination of features: femoral head anteroposteriorly narrow and with signifcant posterior orientation; accessory trochanter low and confuent with lesser trochanter; lateral ridge present on femoral lateral surface; weak fourth trochanter present; metatarsal III with triangular proximal articular surface, prominent anterior fange near proximal end, highly asymmetrical hemicondyles, and longitudinal groove on distal articular surface; and ungual of pedal digit II with lateral collateral groove deeper and more dorsally located than medial groove. The holotype of Anomalipes zhaoi is smaller than is typical for Caenagnathidae but larger than is typical for the other major oviraptorosaurian subclade, Oviraptoridae. Size comparisons among oviraptorisaurians show that the Caenagnathidae vary much more widely in size than the Oviraptoridae. Oviraptorosauria is a clade of maniraptoran theropod dinosaurs characterized by a short, high skull, long neck and short tail.
    [Show full text]
  • (Diapsida: Saurosphargidae), with Implications for the Morphological Diversity and Phylogeny of the Group
    Geol. Mag.: page 1 of 21. c Cambridge University Press 2013 1 doi:10.1017/S001675681300023X A new species of Largocephalosaurus (Diapsida: Saurosphargidae), with implications for the morphological diversity and phylogeny of the group ∗ CHUN LI †, DA-YONG JIANG‡, LONG CHENG§, XIAO-CHUN WU†¶ & OLIVIER RIEPPEL ∗ Laboratory of Evolutionary Systematics of Vertebrates, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 643, Beijing 100044, China ‡Department of Geology and Geological Museum, Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR China §Wuhan Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Wuhan, 430223, PR China ¶Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, STN ‘D’, Ottawa, ON K1P 6P4, Canada Department of Geology, The Field Museum, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605-2496, USA (Received 31 July 2012; accepted 25 February 2013) Abstract – Largocephalosaurus polycarpon Cheng et al. 2012a was erected after the study of the skull and some parts of a skeleton and considered to be an eosauropterygian. Here we describe a new species of the genus, Largocephalosaurus qianensis, based on three specimens. The new species provides many anatomical details which were described only briefly or not at all in the type species, and clearly indicates that Largocephalosaurus is a saurosphargid. It differs from the type species mainly in having three premaxillary teeth, a very short retroarticular process, a large pineal foramen, two sacral vertebrae, and elongated small granular osteoderms mixed with some large ones along the lateral most side of the body. With additional information from the new species, we revise the diagnosis and the phylogenetic relationships of Largocephalosaurus and clarify a set of diagnostic features for the Saurosphargidae Li et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Parker's (2003) Thesis
    CHAPTER 8 TAXONOMY OF THE STAGONOLEPIDIDAE SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY ARCHOSAURIA Cope, 1869 PSEUDOSUCHIA Zittel 1887-1890 sensu Gauthier, 1986 SUCHIA Krebs, 1974 STAGONOLEPIDIDAE Lydekker, 1887 Revised diagnosis -- Pseudosuchians that possess the following synapomorphies: premaxilla that is edentulous anteriorly and upturned into a mediolaterally expanded “shovel” at its terminus; external nares much longer than antorbital fenestra; supratemporal fenestra laterally exposed; small peg-like teeth possessing bulbous crowns that are waisted; posterior ramus of jugal downturned; mandible is “slipper-shaped” with an acute anterior terminus; dentary is edentulous anteriorly; posterior margin of parietal modified to receive paramedian scutes; proximal humerus greatly expanded with hypertrophied deltopectoral crest; femur, straight, not twisted, with a hypertrophied, knob-like fourth trochanter; laterally expanded transverse processes in the dorsal series that contain both rib facets; well-developed accessory (hyposphene-hypantrum) articulations on the dorsal vertebrae; iliac blade high, thickened dorsally; anterior iliac blade, short, robust, and slightly recurved ventrally; an extensive carapace of rectangular (wider than long) osteoderms occurring in four distinct rows; and extensive ventral and appendicular armor (Parrish, 1994; Long and Murry, 1995; Heckert and Lucas, 2000; Small, 2002). The synonymy lists in this chapter are modified from Heckert and Lucas (2000). STAGONOLEPININAE Heckert and Lucas, 2000 Huene (1942) originally used the name “Stagonolepinae” as a subfamily for Stagonolepis. Heckert and Lucas (2000) modified this to Stagonolepininae and defined it cladistically. Stagonolepininae is defined as a stem-based taxon by Heckert and Lucas (2000:1551) consisting of all stagonolepididids “more closely related to Stagonolepis than the last common ancestor of Stagonolepis and Desmatosuchus.” Stagonolepininae consists of Coahomasuchus + Aetosaurus + Stagonolepis + Typothoraxinae.
    [Show full text]