Karen Bradley MP Parliamentary Under Secretary of State

2Asdfasdf Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF www.gov.uk/home -office

Sir William Cash MP Chairman of the European Scrutiny Committee House of Commons 7 Millbank London SW1P 3JA

Re: Explanatory Memorandum on Commission staff working document SWD (2014) 166 Final

I write in response to your Committee’s comments on the Government’s Explanatory Memorandum on Commission staff working document: Revised preliminary list of the former third pillar acquis. The Home Secretary has also asked me to reply on her behalf to your letter of 9 July in which you raise a number of similar points.

The Treaty sets out that all former Third Pillar measures will cease to apply to the UK on 1 December except where the United Kingdom decides to rejoin, or where an amendment to a measure has removed it from the scope of the opt-out and submitted the amended measure to the full powers of the Commission and Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) earlier. A full updated list of measures that the Government considers to be subject to the opt-out is included at Annex A to this letter. This updated list will also be made available on the Government’s website. This list includes information on the measures that have been amended or replaced by post-Lisbon measures and indicates whether the Government has opted into these under the UK’s post-Lisbon opt-in arrangements. This list may be subject to further changes ahead of 1 December 2014 and, as requested, if further changes do occur, I will ensure that Parliament is fully informed of these.

To assist with your scrutiny of this complex matter, details of those measures that have been added or removed from the Government’s list of measures subject to the opt-out, last published in September 2013, can be found below.

 Council Act of 10 March 1995, adopted on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on the EU, drawing up the convention on simplified extradition procedures between the

Member States of the European Union (number 1 on the Commission list, added at number 138 to the Government’s list)  Council Act of 27 September 1996 drawing up the Convention relating to extradition between the Member States of the European Union (number 4 on the Commission list, added at number 139 to the Government’s list)  Council Decision 2006/697/EC of 27 June 2006 on the signing of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway (Number 65 on the Commission’s list, added at number 140 to the Government’s list)

Further to discussions in the Friends of the Presidency Working Group, the Government agrees that the above measures are part of the relevant third pillar acquis. The 1995 and 1996 Extradition Conventions apply between Member States and Norway and Iceland as a result of Council Decision 2003/169/JHA (included at number 48 on the Commission’s preliminary list and on the Government’s list at number 134). Both will be replaced by the 2006 Agreement between the EU, Iceland and Norway on the surrender procedure between the EU, Iceland and Norway once that agreement comes into force. This is expected before 1 December 2014. Council Decision 2006/697/EC relates to the signature of this 2006 Agreement. The Government has opted-in to the subsequent proposal for the conclusion of that agreement which remains binding on the UK.

 Council Decision 2009/820/CFSP of 23 October 2009 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement on extradition between the European Union and the United States of America and the Agreement on mutual legal assistance between the European Union and the United States of America (Number 93 on the Commission’s list, added at number 101 to the Government’s list)

The Government’s list of September 2013 included the international agreement to which this conclusion Decision relates to. Further to discussions in the Friends of the Presidency Working Group, the Government agrees that this measure is part of the relevant third pillar acquis for other Member States and it has been added to the Government’s list.

 Council Act of 29 November 1996 drawing up, on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, the Protocol on the interpretation, by way of preliminary rulings, by the Court of Justice of the European Communities of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests (number 11 on the Commission list, added at number 137 to the Government’s list)

This measure is a Protocol to the PIF Convention (number 8 on the Government’s list). The PIF Convention will be replaced by the Directive on the fight against fraud to the Union's financial interests by means of criminal law (PIF) COM(2012)363, once adopted. Further to discussions in the Friends of the Presidency Working Group, the Government agrees that this measure is part of the relevant third pillar acquis for other Member States and it has been added to the Government’s list.

 Council Decision 2008/633/JHA of 23 June 2008 concerning access for consultation of the Visa Information System (VIS) by designated authorities of Member States and by Europol for the purposes of the prevention, detection and investigation of terrorist offences and of other serious criminal offences (number 134 on the Commission list, added at number 141 to the Government’s list)

The UK is prevented from participating in the VIS by virtue of the ECJ ruling in Case C- 482/08 UK v Council. Further to discussions in the Working Group, the Government agrees that this measure is part of the relevant third pillar acquis for other Member States and it has been added to the Government’s list.

 Declaration of the Executive Committee of 9 February 1998 on the abduction of minors (SCH/Com-ex (97) decl. 13 rev 2) (added at number 142 to the Government’s list)

Further to discussions in the Friends of the Presidency Working Group, the Government agrees that this measure is part of the relevant third pillar acquis for other Member States. However, the Government notes that this has been superseded by point 5.5 (adding a flag) of the SIRENE Manual in which the UK participates (Commission Decision 2008/334/JHA) and by point 6 of Annex VII of the Schengen Border Code (Regulation (EC) No 652/2006) which the UK does not participate in.

Measures removed from the Government’s list of measures subject to the opt-out published in September 2013  Accession Agreements: Italy, Spain, Portugal, Greece, Austria, Denmark, Finland, Sweden.

The pre-Amsterdam accession agreements currently referred to in Article 1(b) of Decision 2000/365/EC were based on Article 140 of the Schengen Convention (which stated that any Member State may become a party to the Convention). Article 140 is no longer operative and was not given a third pillar legal base in Council Decision 1999/435/EC. Further to discussions in the Friends of the Presidency Working Group, the Government considers the better view is that these provisions are outside the scope of the opt-out. In any event, the Government considers that the UK’s participation in the Schengen acquis must be taken together with other Member States and the Associated EFTA States.

The Government further notes that the Articles and declarations of the relevant accession protocols included in Council Decision 2000/365/EC refer to various provisions which have been superseded. In relation to the Articles which refer to the Nordic Passport Union, the Government notes that these were given a Schengen Protocol legal base in Council Decision 1999/436/EC, and so are also outside the scope of the UK’s opt-out. In addition, these clauses continue to apply to the relevant Nordic countries and the UK’s position cannot affect that given that it is not part of the Nordic Passport Union.

Schengen Information System You asked for clarification on the rationale for the inclusion of five Council Decisions concerning SIS on the Government’s list of measures subject to the opt-out. Although the UK does not participate in SIS it is legally bound by the measures that establish the system and which provide for the transition to the Second Generation Schengen Information System (SIS II). As you will be aware, the UK is due to connect to SIS II later this year. When the UK goes live these measures will be formally repealed for the UK and they will be removed from Government’s list of measures subject to the opt-out. The position with respect to the UK contrasts with the position for other Member States that have already connected to SIS II. For those Member States these measures have already been repealed and as a result are not included on the Commission’s list.

Third Country Agreements You asked for confirmation that third country agreements are subject to the UK’s opt-out and for clarification of the scope of the opt-out in relation to these measures. You also asked whether the Commission’s list would be revised accordingly.

The Government considers the third country agreements in Annex A to be subject to the opt-out as the police and criminal justice elements of these agreements will become subject to the jurisdiction of the CJEU from 1 December. This is due to the fact that these agreements have a joint legal base, part of which can be found in the ex-Third Pillar. I am not aware of whether the Commission has plans to update its preliminary list or not. However, the Commission has commenced a ‘REFIT’ programme to formally repeal measures that are now considered to be obsolete. This exercise may result in further changes to the list of measures subject to the opt-out.

Engagement with Parliament The Government has been clear throughout this process that we would continue to update Parliament, as we have done. It is for this reason that the Government called this matter for debate in the House of Commons on 10 July and published Command Paper 8897. The contributions made by members of your Committee, as well as others, during the debate were particularly valuable and the Government remains committed to engaging with Parliament on this matter again later in the year. As the Home Secretary stated during the debate on 10 July, Parliament will have an opportunity to vote on this matter in due course.

I look forward to engaging further with you on this important matter.

We are copying this letter to the Chairman of the Justice Select Committee, Rt. Hon. Sir Alan Beith MP; the Chairman of the House of Lords , Lord Boswell; the Chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, Rt. Hon. MP; Les Parry, Cabinet Office; Deborah Maggs, Home Office Departmental Scrutiny Coordinator; and Patricia Zimmermann, Ministry of Justice Departmental Scrutiny Coordinator.

Karen Bradley