DOCSLIB.ORG

Literature Cited for Final Rule – 2 Texas Plants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Literature Cited for Final Rule – 2 Texas Plants Literature Cited for Final Rule – 2 Texas Plants Adams, J. 2005. Letter from Jennifer Adams, Texas Department of Transportation, to Edith Erfling, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, regarding a realignment project on Farm-to- Market 230, Houston County, Texas. February 17, 2005. 29 pp. Adams, J. 2011b. Telephone conversation between Jennifer Adams, Texas Department of Transportation, and Robyn Cobb, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, regarding highway department maintenance operations in East Texas. December 1, 2011. 2 pp. Adams, J. 2011c. Telephone conversation between Jennifer Adams, Texas Department of Transportation, and Amber Miller, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, regarding expansion along right-of-ways, specifically Hwy 94, and use of “no mow” signs as management. December 8, 2011. 1 p. Adams, J. 2013a. Electronic mail communication from Jennifer Adams, Texas Department of Transportation, to Amber Miller and Robyn Cobb, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, regarding excluding “Fill” areas along highway right-of-ways as critical habitat. May 3, 2013. 1 p. Adams, J. 2013b. Telephone conversation between Jennifer Adams, Texas Department of Transportation, and Amber Miller, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, regarding sedimentation minimization measures (silt fencing) in highway right-of-ways. May 7, 2013. 1 p. Adams, J. 2013c. Electronic mail communication from Jennifer Adams, Texas Department of Transportation, with Amber Miller, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, regarding highway right-of-way re-seed mixtures that include invasive grasses. May 8, 2013. 2 pp. Adler, L. S., R. Karban, and S. Y. Strauss. 2001. Direct and indirect effects of alkaloids on plant fitness via herbivory and pollination. Ecology 82(7): 2032–2044. Allen, R. 2011a. Electronic mail communication from Robert Allen, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, to Amber Miller, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, regarding coastal bermuda grass on Boggy Slough site. December 2, 2011. 2 pp. Allen, R. 2011b. Electronic mail communication from Robert Allen, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, to Robyn Cobb, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, regarding well pad size in San Augustine, Texas, area. December 19, 2011. 1 p. Allen, R., and R. Duty. 2010. Neches River rose-mallow survey forms. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lufkin, Texas. 4 pp. Angelina and Neches River Authority. 2012. Brief history of the Lake Columbia water supply project. http://www.anra.org/divisions/reservoirs/columbia/index.html. Accessed on May 17, 2012. 3 pp. Antonovics, J. 1976. The nature of limits to natural selection. Missouri Botanical Garden Press 63(2): 224–247. Armour, C., D. Duff, and W. Elmore. 1994. The effects of livestock grazing on western riparian and stream ecosystem. Fisheries 19(9): 9–12. Arrington, D. A., L. A. Toth, and J. W. Koebel, Jr. 1999. Effects of rooting by feral hogs Sus scrofa L. on the structure of a floodplain vegetation assemblage. Wetlands 19(3): 535– 544. Baker, L. A. 1992. Introduction to nonpoint source pollution in the United States and prospects for wetland use. Ecological Engineering 1: 1–26. Bale, J. S., G. J. Masters, I. D. Hodkinson, C. Awmack, T. Martijn Bezemer, V. K. Brown, J. Butterfield, A. Buse, J. C. Coulson, J. Farrar, J. E. G. Good, R. Harrington, S. Hartley, T. H. Jones, R. L. Londroth, M. C. Press, I. Symrnioudis, A. D. Watt, and J. B. Whittaker. 2002. Herbivory in global climate change research: Direct effects of rising temperatures on insect herbivores. Global Change Biology 8: 1–16. Balmer, W. E., and N. G. Little. 1978. Site Preparation Methods. In: Tippin, T. (Ed.) Proceedings: A Symposium on Principles of Maintaining Productivity on Prepared Sites. Atlanta, U.S. Pp. 60–64. Barrett, S. C. H., and J. R. Kohn. 1991. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: Implications for conservation. In: Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants, D. A. Falk and K. E. Holsinger (Eds.). Oxford University Press, New York, New York, and Oxford, UK. 283 pp. Baskin, J. M., and C. C. Baskin. 1988. Endemism in rock outcrop plant communities of unglaciated eastern United States: An evaluation of the roles of the edaphic , genetic, and light factors. Journal of Biogeography 15(5 and 6): 829-840. Belsky, A. J., A. Matzke, and S. Uselman. 1999. Survey of livestock influences on stream and riparian ecosystems in the Western United States. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54: 419–431. Beck, J. B., I. A. Al-Shehbaz, and B. A. Schaal. 2006. Leavenworthia (Brassicaceae) revisited: Testing classic systematic and mating system hypotheses. Systematic Botany 31(1): 151–159. Birnbaum, S. 2011. Electronic mail communication from Sandy Birnbaum, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department’s Natural Diversity Database, and Amber Miller, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, regarding Hallsville element of occurrence record and specimen identification as Hibiscus dasycalyx. December 13, 2011. 1 p. Black, S. H, M. Shepherd, M. Vaughan, C. LaBar, and N. Hodges. 2009. Yolo Natural Heritage Program Pollinator Conservation Strategy. Xerces Society of Invertebrate Conservation. 72 pp. Blake, S. F. 1958. Two species of Hibiscus from Texas. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 48(9): 277–278. Blanchard, O.J., Jr. 1976. A revision of species segregated from Hibiscus sect. Trionum (Medicus) de Candolle sensu lato (Malvaceae). Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University. Ithaca, New York. 260 pp. Borland, D. 2008. Case Study Detail–USA: Alabama: Cumberland sandstone glade restoration at the William B. Bankhead National Forest. http://www.globalrestorationnetwork.org/database/case–study/?id219 Accessed on May 17, 2012. 5 pp. Brathwaite, L. D. 2009. Shale-deposited natural gas: A review of potential. California Energy Commission. CEC–200–2009–005–SD. 30 pp. Bridges, E. L. 1988. Endangered species information system: Species workbook for Lesquerella pallida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. 42 pp. Brigham, C. A. 2003. Chapter 3. Factors affecting persistence in formerly common or historically rare plants. In: Population Viability in Plants: Conservation, Management, and Modeling of Rare Plants. C. A. Brigham and M. W. Schwartz (Eds.). Ecological Studies 165. Springer-Verlag. Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany. 369 pp. Burton, G., and W. Hanna. 1985. Bermudagrass. In: Forages, the Sciences of Grassland Agriculture . M. Heath, R. Barnes, and D. Metcalfe (Eds.). Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa. 643 pp. Busch, J. W., and L. Urban. 2011. Insights gained from 50 years of studying the evolution of self-compatibility in Leavenworthia (Brassicaceae). Evolutionary Biology 38: 15–27. Butterfield, B. J., W. E. Rogers, and E. Siemann. 2004. Growth of Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum) and four native trees under varying water regimes. Texas Journal of Science 56(4): 335–347. Button, J. W., and D. N. Little. 1997. Evaluation of glauconite aggregate for pavement construction. Research Project No. 7–3901 for Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A and M University System, College Station, Texas. 25 pp. Cane, J. H. 1991. Soils of ground-nesting bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea): Texture, moisture, cell depth and climate. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 64(4): 406–413. Carr, W. R. 2005. Notes on populations of white bladderpod and Texas golden gladecress on a site near Chapel Hill, San Augustine County, Texas, 29 March 2005 and 26 April 2005. Contract report by The Nature Conservancy for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 8 pp. Carr, W. R. 2006. Electronic mail communication from Bill Carr, The Nature Conservancy, to Jason Singhurst and Ricky Maxey, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, and Kathy Nemec, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, regarding conditions on Weches Glade sites. December 1, 2006. 2 pp. Center for Plant Conservation. 2011. National Collection Plant Profile for Hibiscus dasycalyx. http://www.centerforplantconservation.org/collection/cpc_viewprofile.asp?CPCNum=22 58. Accessed on December 11, 2011. 5 pp. Cobb, R. A. 2011. File notes regarding observations of Texas golden gladecress habitat conditions at known population sites on October 20, 2011, site visit. 6 pp. Conway, W. C., L. M. Smith, and J. F. Bergan. 2000. Evaluating germination protocols for Chinese tallow (Sapium sebiferum) seeds. Texas Journal of Science 52(3): 267–270. Correll, D. S. and M. C. Johnston. 1979. Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas. The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas. 1881 pp. Correll, D.S. and H. B. Correll. 1975. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of the Southwestern United States. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 1777 pp. Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. La Roe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, FWS/OBS 79/31. December 1979, reprinted 1992. 131 pp. Creech, D. 2011a. Phone conversation between Dr. David Creech, Stephen F. Austin State University, and Amber Miller, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, regarding introduced sites of the rose-mallow, potential for threats (trampling), and the status of the Neches River rose-mallow in the nursery trade. September 27, 2011. 2 pp. Creech, D. 2011b. Electronic mail communication from Dr. David Creech, Stephen F. Austin State University, to Amber Miller, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, regarding site visit to Mill Creek Gardens in 2011. November 14, 2011. 1 p. Creech, D. 2011c. Electronic mail communication from Dr. David Creech, Stephen F. Austin State University, to Amber Miller, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, regarding management of Mill Creek Gardens, Nacogdoches County. November 16, 2011. 1 p. Daubenmire, R. 1990. The Magnolia grandiflora–Quercus virginiana forest in Florida. American Midland Naturalist Journal 123: 331–347. Davis, H. B. 1966. Geology of the Texas Highway Department, District 11. Texas Highway Department, Departmental Research Report No. 63–3. Lufkin District Laboratory, Lufkin, Texas. 66 pp. Davis, K. 2000. Electronic mail communication from Kathleen Davis, Stephen F. Austin State University, to Dr. Creech, Stephen F. Austin State University, Kathy Nemec, U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinguishing the Neches River Rose Mallow, Hibiscus Dasycalyx, from Its Congeners Using DNA Sequence Data and Niche Modeling Methods Melody P
    University of Texas at Tyler Scholar Works at UT Tyler Biology Theses Biology Spring 2015 Distinguishing the Neches River Rose Mallow, Hibiscus Dasycalyx, from its Congeners Using DNA Sequence Data and Niche Modeling Methods Melody P. Sain Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uttyler.edu/biology_grad Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Sain, Melody P., "Distinguishing the Neches River Rose Mallow, Hibiscus Dasycalyx, from its Congeners Using DNA Sequence Data and Niche Modeling Methods" (2015). Biology Theses. Paper 26. http://hdl.handle.net/10950/292 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at Scholar Works at UT Tyler. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholar Works at UT Tyler. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DISTINGUISHING THE NECHES RIVER ROSE MALLOW, HIBISCUS DASYCALYX, FROM ITS CONGENERS USING DNA SEQUENCE DATA AND NICHE MODELING METHODS by MELODY P. SAIN A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Biology Joshua Banta, Ph.D., Committee Chair College of Arts and Sciences The University of Texas at Tyler June 2015 Acknowledgements I would like to give special thanks to my family for their unconditional support and encouragement throughout my academic career. My parents, Douglas and Bernetrice Sain, have always been at my side anytime that I needed that little extra push when things seemed to be too hard. I would also like to thank my little brother, Cody Sain, in always giving me an extra reason to do my best and for always listening to me when I just needed someone to talk to.
    [Show full text]
  • Rain Garden Plant List
    Rain Garden Plant List This is by no means a complete list of the many plants suitable for your rain garden: Native or Botanical Name Common Name Category Naturalized Wet Zone Acer rubrum var. drummondii Southern Swamp Maple Tree Any Acorus calamus Sweet Flag Grass Any Adiantum capillus-veneris Southern Maidenhair Fern Fern Median Aesculus pavia Scarlet Buckeye Tree Yes Any Alstromeria pulchella Peruvian Lily Perennial Any Amorpha fruticosa False Indigo Wildflower Yes Any Andropogon gerardi Big Bluestem Grass Yes Median Andropogon scoparius Little Bluestem Grass Yes Median Aniscanthus wrightii Flame Acanthus Shrub Yes Median Aquilegia canadensis Columbine, Red Wildflower Yes Median Aquilegia ciliata Texas Blue Star Wildflower Yes Median Aquilegia hinckleyana Columbine, Hinckley's Perennial Median, Margin Aquilegia longissima Columbine, Longspur Wildflower Yes Center Asclepias tuberosa Butterfly Weed Wildflower Yes Margin Asimina triloba Pawpaw Tree Any Betula nigra River Birch Tree Yes Any Bignonia capreolata Crossvine Vine Yes Any Callicarpa americana American Beautyberry Shrub Yes Any Canna spp. Canna Lily Perennial No Any Catalpa bignonioides Catalpa Tree Yes Any Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush Shrub Yes Any Chasmanthus latifolium Inland Sea Oats Grass Yes Median, Margin Cyrilla recemiflora Leatherwood or Titi Tree Tree Yes Median, Margin Clematis pitcheri Leatherflower Vine Yes Any Crataegus reverchonii Hawthorn Tree Yes Any Crinum spp. Crinum Perennial Any Delphinium virescens Prairie Larkspur Wildflower Yes Any Dryoptera normalis
    [Show full text]
  • Melody P. Sain1*, Julia Norrell-Tober*, Katherine Barthel, Megan Seawright, Alyssa Blanton, Kate L
    MULTIPLE COMPLEMENTARY STUDIES CLARIFY WHICH CO-OCCURRING CONGENER PRESENTS THE GREATEST HYBRIDIZATION THREAT TO A RARE TEXAS ENDEMIC WILDFLOWER (HIBISCUS DASYCALYX: MALVACEAE) Melody P. Sain1*, Julia Norrell-Tober*, Katherine Barthel, Megan Seawright, Alyssa Blanton, Kate L. Hertweck2, John S. Placyk, Jr.3 Department of Biology and Center for Environment, Biodiversity, and Conservation University of Texas at Tyler 3900 University Blvd., Tyler, Texas 75799, U.S.A. Randall Small Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee-Knoxville Dabney Hall, 1416 Circle Dr., Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, U.S.A. [email protected] Lance R. Williams, Marsha G. Williams, Joshua A. Banta Department of Biology and Center for Environment, Biodiversity, and Conservation University of Texas at Tyler 3900 University Blvd., Tyler, Texas 75799, U.S.A. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] *The two authors contributed equally to this work. 1Current address: Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A., [email protected] 2Current address: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N, Seattle, Washington 98109, U.S.A., [email protected] 3Current address: Trinity Valley Community College, 100 Cardinal Dr., Athens, Texas 75751, U.S.A., [email protected] ABSTRACT The Neches River Rose Mallow (Hibiscus dasycalyx) is a rare wildflower endemic to Texas that is federally protected in the U.S.A. While previous work suggests that H. dasycalyx may be hybridizing with its widespread congeners, the Halberd-leaved Rose Mallow (H. laevis) and the Woolly Rose Mallow (H. moscheutos), this has not been studied in detail. We evaluated the relative threats to H.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Ecological Services do TAMU-Cc' Campus Box 338 6300 Ocean Drive Corpus Christi. Texas 78412 September 14,2012 Honorable Joe English Nacogdoches County Judge 101 West Main, Suite 170 Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Dear Honorable English: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is proposing to list the Texas golden gladecress (Leavenworthia texana) as endangered and the Neches River rose-mallow (Hibiscus dasycalyx) as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (Act). In addition we are proposing to designate critical habitat for both plants. A 60-day period oftime is allotted for the public to review and comment on this proposal; beginning on September 11, 2012, the day ofpublication ofthe proposal in the Federal Register, and ending on November 13,2012. The Texas golden gladecress is a winter annual plant that is known to occur naturally in San Augustine and Sabine counties in East Texas. There are only eight documented Texas golden gladecress occurrences, including four historic sites where the plants have been eliminated. The Texas golden gladecress is a habitat specialist, occurring only on isolated outcrops ofthe Weches Geologic Formation (a specific type of soil). Populations are found on private land, and in two instances extend onto State highway right-of-ways. The species is threatened by glauconite quarrying activities; oil and gas development, including pipeline construction; competition from native and nonnative species; herbicide spraying; and conversion ofpastures or forest with native prairie patches to pine plantations. The Neches River rose-mallow is a non-woody perennial plant that is known to occur naturally in Cherokee, Houston, and Trinity counties in East Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Habitat-Plants
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv., Interior § 17.96(a), Nt. § 17.96 Critical habitat—plants. aqueducts, runways, well pads, metering sta- tions, roads and the filled areas immediately * * * * * adjacent to pavement, and other paved areas) and the land on which they are lo- (a) Flowering plants. cated existing within the legal boundaries on October 11, 2013. * * * * * (4) Critical habitat map units. Soil Survey Geographic Dataset (SSURGO) was used as a Family Brassicaceae: Leavenworthia texana base map layer. The SSURGO is an updated (Texas golden gladecress) digital version of the Natural Resources Con- (1) Critical habitat units are depicted for servation Service county soil surveys. The San Augustine and Sabine Counties, Texas, SSURGO uses recent digital orthophotos and on the maps below. fieldwork to update the original printed sur- (2) Within these areas, the primary con- veys. Data layers defining map units were stituent elements of the physical or biologi- created using the Texas golden gladecress’ cal features essential to the conservation of restriction to the Weches Formation and its Leavenworthia texana consist of the three pri- tight association with the three soil map mary constituent elements identified for the units: Nacogdoches clay loam 1–5 percent species: slope, Trawick gravelly clay loam 5–15 per- (i) Exposed outcrops of the Weches Forma- cent slope, or Bub clay loam 2–5 percent tion within Weches prairies. Within the slope. In San Augustine and Sabine Counties, outcrop sites, there must be bare, exposed these soil types are restricted to the Weches bedrock on top-level surfaces or rocky ledges Formation. Locations of all known with small depressions where rainwater or gladecress populations, as well as potential seepage can collect.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinguishing the Neches River Rose Mallow (Hibiscus Dasycalyx) from Its Congeners Using Genetic and Niche Modeling Methods
    FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT As Required by THE ENDANGERED SPECIES PROGRAM TEXAS Grant No. TX E-161-R (F13AP00690) Endangered and Threatened Species Conservation Distinguishing the Neches River Rose Mallow (Hibiscus dasycalyx) from its congeners using genetic and niche modeling methods Prepared by: Dr. Josh Banta Carter Smith Executive Director Clayton Wolf Director, Wildlife 8 September 2017 INTERIM REPORT STATE: ____Texas_______________ GRANT NUMBER: ___ TX E-161-R-1__ GRANT TITLE: Distinguishing the Neches River Rose Mallow (Hibiscus dasycalyx) from its congeners using genetic and niche modeling methods. REPORTING PERIOD: ____1 September 2013 to 31 Auguts 2017_ OBJECTIVE(S). To resolve the taxonomic relationships among Hibiscus dasycalyx and its congeners (H. laevis and H. moscheutos), quantify the hybridization threat posed by H. laevis and H. moscheutos to H. dasycalyx, and create ground-truthed, geo-referenced maps of East Texas, showing the areas of suitable habitat for H. dasycalyx versus its congeners. Segment Objectives: Task #1. August 2013 – October 2013: Intensive (non-destructive) leaf sampling of H. dasycalyx and its congeners in the field. Task #2. October 2013 – August 2015: Phylogenetic and population genetic analysis of H. dasycalyx and its congeners using modern molecular methods. Task #3. October 2014 – July 2015: Creation of ecological niche models. Task #4. July – August 2015: Refinement of the ecological niche models and analysis of niche separation among species. Significant Deviations: None. Summary Of Progress: Please see Attachment A. Location: Angelina, Trinity, and Neches river watersheds in Cherokee, Harrison, Houston, Trinity, Angelina, Anderson, and Neches counties, Texas. Cost: ___Costs were not available at time of this report, they will be available upon completion of the Final Report and conclusion of the project.__ Prepared by: _Craig Farquhar_____________ Date: 8 September 2017 Approved by: ______________________________ Date:_____8 September 2017 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices, Glossary
    APPENDIX ONE ILLUSTRATION SOURCES REF. CODE ABR Abrams, L. 1923–1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ADD Addisonia. 1916–1964. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Reprinted with permission from Addisonia, vol. 18, plate 579, Copyright © 1933, The New York Botanical Garden. ANDAnderson, E. and Woodson, R.E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted with permission of the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. ANN Hollingworth A. 2005. Original illustrations. Published herein by the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth. Artist: Anne Hollingworth. ANO Anonymous. 1821. Medical botany. E. Cox and Sons, London. ARM Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1889–1912. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. BA1 Bailey, L.H. 1914–1917. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Macmillan Company, New York. BA2 Bailey, L.H. and Bailey, E.Z. 1976. Hortus third: A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Reprinted with permission from William Crepet and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. BA3 Bailey, L.H. 1900–1902. Cyclopedia of American horticulture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. BB2 Britton, N.L. and Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British posses- sions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. BEA Beal, E.O. and Thieret, J.W. 1986. Aquatic and wetland plants of Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. Reprinted with permission of Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Vascular Plant Taxa Associated with the Longleaf Pine Ecosystems: Patterns in Taxonomy and Ecology
    Rare Vascular Plant Taxa Associated with the Longleaf Pine Ecosystems: Patterns in Taxonomy and Ecology Joan Walker U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Department of Forest Resources, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 ABSTRACT Ecological, taxonomic and biogeographical characteristics are used to describe the group of 187 rare vascular plant taxa associated with longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) throughout its range. Taxonomic and growth form distributions mirror the patterns of common plus rare taxa in the flora. Most of the species have rather narrow habitat preferences, and narrow geo­ graphic ranges, but a few rare sp~cies with broad habitat tolerances and wider geographic ranges are identified. Ninety-six local endemics are associated with longleaf pine ecosystems. This incidence is as high as in other comparably-sized endemic-rich areas in North America. A distinct geographic trend in rare species composition is indicated. Species fall into 4 groups: Florida longleaf associates, south Atlantic coastal plain, east Gulf coastal plain, and west Gulf coastal plain species. Distributional factors that produce rarity must be considered in the development of conser­ vation strategies. Overall, conserving longleaf communities rangewide will protect .large ~ numbers of rare plant taxa in Southeastern United States. INTRODUCTION 1986), and inevitably the strategies required to con­ serve them will differ. Recently Hardin and White (1989) effectively focused conservationists' attentions on the high The purposes of this study are to (1) identify numbers of rare species associated with wiregrass the rare species associated with longleaf pine eco­ (Aristida stricta), a grass that dominates the ground systems rangewide; (2) characterize the rare spe­ layer of longleaf communities through a large part cies taxonomically and ecologically, in order to of its range, and over a broad range of longleaf identify patterns that may distinguish this group habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd Lone Star Native Regional Plant Conference
    Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference SFA Gardens 2003 2nd Lone Star Native Regional Plant Conference David Creech Stephen F. Austin State University Greg Grant Stephen F. Austin State University Mark Norman Stephen F. Austin State University Dawn Parish Stephen F. Austin State University Matt Welch Stephen F. Austin State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/sfa_gardens_lonestar Part of the Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Creech, David; Grant, Greg; Norman, Mark; Parish, Dawn; and Welch, Matt, "2nd Lone Star Native Regional Plant Conference" (2003). Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference. 1. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/sfa_gardens_lonestar/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the SFA Gardens at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Table of Contents Welcome by David Creech Allen, Wildflowers of Louisiana 5 Breunig, Does Our Mission Matter? 10 Ferguson, The Role of Organic Materials in Gardening 12 Foss, The Texas Wildscapes Program 19 Freeborg, Native Plants and the Hydrological Cycle 24 Goodspeed, Jenkins, Midgley, What's Hot Panel Discussion 30 Grant, Running Wild With the Public 38 Hosage, Natural Historians ofTexas 39 Kip hart, Texas Roadsides: An Endangered Species?
    [Show full text]
  • Hardy Hibiscus for Florida Landscapes1 Gary W
    ENH999 Hardy Hibiscus for Florida Landscapes1 Gary W. Knox and Rick Schoellhorn2 Hardy hibiscus are an overlooked group of perennials with alone. The bigger the container, the bigger the impact it tremendous potential for the landscape. Hardy hibiscus are makes. herbaceous perennial members of the genus Hibiscus. They are large-flowered, fast-growing plants reaching up to 15 Hardy Hibiscus Species feet tall and 4 to 8 feet wide. They are close relatives of the Many hardy hibiscus are native to Florida and the south- tropical hibiscus (Hibiscus rosa-sinensis) seen commonly in eastern United States, including comfortroot (Hibiscus the landscapes of southern and central Florida. Unlike their aculeatus), scarlet rosemallow (H. coccineus), swamp tropical counterparts, however, hardy hibiscus are much rosemallow (H. grandiflorus), halberdleaf rosemallow (H. more cold hardy, vigorous, and long lasting, and they have laevis), and crimsoneyed rosemallow (H. moscheutos). larger flowers. These species are worthy of landscape use in their own In north and central Florida, these plants emerge from the right. Swamp rosemallow has rich, fuzzy gray-green leaves ground in mid-to-late spring and bloom from late spring on a plant that reaches up to 15 feet in height. This species through fall. With the exception of some of the herbaceous is salt tolerant and can grow in brackish water directly in species, a hard freeze kills the aboveground growth but the tidal zones. Flowers of H. grandiflorus are about 8 to below-ground stems overwinter and produce new shoots 10 inches across and a clear, soft pink. Flowers of scarlet the following spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Lingua Botanica a Journal for FS Botanists & Plant Ecologists
    Lingua Botanica A Journal for FS Botanists & Plant Ecologists You people are poets. Some of you are weird, really weird, but most of you are poets. Maybe there isn’t much difference. In the last issue of LB, I challenged readers to share the nature of your computer-top decorations. Kudos to those of you that sent me notes. Among the many responses I received, the botanist who told me about a hummingbird nest she kept especially charmed me. It was obvious that the delicate cradle of fiber and down was a daily inspiration to her. Many of you told me about crystals and stream-polished stones that you picked up in the woods. Color seems to be a universal lure: something unique, something unusual. Pressed leaves, pods and seeds, photographs of friends out botanizing, dry grass flowers. Interestingly, you told me mostly about small things, worlds of detail and filigree. On the playful side, there were a number of toy cars, rubber and plastic animals, and idiosyncratic items like children’s art, Dilbert dolls, and pink flamingos. About the only thing that made me scratch my head was the one-armed, severed torso of a G.I Joe doll. It’s a good thing that little trinket belongs to one of my best friends, so I didn’t feel obligated to call social services. Among the responses that interested me most were those from the non-botanist subscribers to LB. There are no more than 100 FS employees in the 430 series, yet nearly 400 people receive each issue of Lingua Botanica.
    [Show full text]