DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Understanding in the Philosophy of R.G. Collingwood

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HUMAN UNDERSTANDING IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF R.G. COLLINGWOOD JOHN KARABELAS PhD, CARDIFF UNIVERSITY 2009 HUMAN UNDERSTANDING IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF R.G. COLLINGWOOD JOHN KARABELAS PhD, CARDIFF UNIVERSITY 2009 UMI Number: U585273 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U585273 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 DECLARATION This workha&not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. S ig n e^j^. .................. (candidate) Date ^.f.. .7.. STATEMENT 1 This thesis is bfiioo submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of i.(insert MCh, MD, MPhil, PhD etc, as appropriate) Signedf (candidate) Date .l^ .....^ ..(c/....'?^f!0.C\. STATEMENT 2 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. Sign (candidate) Date .1^9.... STATEMENT 3 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisatjj Signe< (candidate) D a t e . ^ . ^ ...... STATEMENT 4: PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BAR ON ACCESS I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loans after expiry of a bar on access previously approved by the Graduate Development Committee. Signed (candidate) Date Acknowledgements For the completion of this thesis I owe much to the guidance and attitude to scholarship of my supervisors Professor David Boucher and Professor Bruce Haddock. I am indebted to the department of European Studies and to the British Idealism and Collingwood Centre for their support. My gratitude extends to all my friends and I thank them deeply. I dedicate this thesis to my parents. J.K. Abstract The thesis explores the role of human understanding in R.G. Collingwood’s philosophy. I examine four major areas: the role of psychology, the unity of mind (i.e. unity of thoughts and emotions), the role of art and the case of fairy tales as a source of historical knowledge. These themes taken together expound a coherent way to see human understanding: with psychology Collingwood suggests the form that human understanding cannot assume; the unity of mind is Collingwood’s idea of how we experience an activity, that is, as an undivided whole of emotions and thoughts (and in some respects sensations or feelings too), that exist in every activity as elements that cannot be distinguished or separated. When we come to the forms that an activity can take 1 argue, using art and fairy tales, that human understanding in Collingwood’s system should be seen as a shift from the knowledge of the united spirit (as propounded in Speculum Mentis) to the knowledge of the historical consciousness. The knowledge of the united spirit is achieved through a dialectic scale of the different forms of experience, which individually, in isolation from one another, are not epistemologically valid. In the historical consciousness the forms of experience are epistemologically autonomous and are found within history, all being manifestations of the historical mind. CONTENTS p a g e List of Abbreviations vi INTRODUCTION 1 I: Philosophy, History and Psychology 13 II: The importance of mind’s unity 47 III: From Imagination to Knowledge - The problem of art and the problem of history 80 IV": Fairy tales, Magic and Anthropology 121 CONCLUSION 152 BIBLIOGRAPHY 157 List of Abbreviations Works by R.G. Collimnvood RP Religion and Philosophy, 1916 SM Speculum Mentis, 1924 OPA Outlines of a Philosophy of Art, 1925 PA The Principles of Art, 1938 A An Autobiography, 1939 EM An Essay on Metaphysics, 1940 (rev. ed. 1998) NL The New Leviathan, 1942 (rev. ed. 1992) IH The Idea of History, 1946 (rev. ed. 1993) PH The Principles of History, 1999 PE The Philosophy of Enchantment, 2005 Works bv others Debbins Essays in the Philosophy of History, 1965 Donagan The Later Philosophy of R.G. Collingwood, 1962 Dray History as Re-enactment. R.G. Collingwood’s Idea of History, 1995 MHD Mind, History, Dialectic, 1969 HS History as a Science: The Philosophy of R.G. Collingwood, 1981 SPT The social and political thought of R.G. Collingwood, 1989 Krausz Critical Essays on the Philosophy of R.G. Collingwood, 1972 PHC Philosophy, History and Civilization, 1995 Rubinoff Collingwood and the Reform of Metaphysics, 1970 Taylor 1985 Bibliography, 1985 Taylor 1988 Bibliography, 1988 Coll i mr* ood Studies CS Collingwood Studies, 1994-1999 (vols I-VI) Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 2000-2004 (vols VII-X) Collingwood and British Idealism Studies: incorporating Bradley Studies, 2005-2008 (vols XI-XIV) vi INTRODUCTION This thesis is about Collingwood’s philosophy of history and human understanding.1 Human understanding is central in Collingwood’s philosophy. In Speculum Mentis he maintains that “We try to understand ourselves and our world only in order that we may learn how to live” (p. 15). His philosophy, like Giambattista Vico’s and Wilhelm Dilthey’s, is highly anthropocentric.' Man is the focus of philosophical reflection and the study of human conduct ensues in the understanding of him: what it is that he does; why he does what he does; why sometimes he fails and sometimes succeeds. This understanding is for Collingwood the role of history. The engagement with human understanding, in the way that Collingwood proceeded, is an important endeavour. It is an endeavour understood in terms of a constant effort towards 1 For some general books on the philosophy of history and some useful classical philosophical expositions of the problems of history see: W.H. Walsh. 1951. An introduction to philosophy of history. Hutchinson. London (3rd rev. ed. 1967); B.A. Haddock. 1980.An introduction to historical thought. London, Edward Arnold; R. Martin. 1977.Historical Explanation, Re-enactment and practical inference. Cornell University Press; R. Klibansky and H.J. Paton (eds.). 1936.Philosophy & history: essays presented to Ernst Cassirer. Oxford Clarendon Press [also Collingwood’s review of that book in 1937 in English Historical Review, vol. 52, pp. 141-146 (reprinted in CS, vol. V, 1998, pp. 145-151)]; I. Berlin. 1960. ‘The Concept of Scientific History’, in History and Theory, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 1-31; F.H. Bradley. 1874.The Presuppositions of Critical History, (reprinted in C ollected Essays, 1969, pp. 1-70. Oxford Clarendon Press. This book was first published in 1935 in two volumes). “ For more details on the work of Vico see: G. Vico. 1968. The New Science o f Giambattista Vico. (revised translation of the third edition (1744) / Thomas Goddard Bergin and Max Harold Fisch) Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press; G. Vico. 1944. The autobiography o f Giambattista Vico. (translated from the Italian by Max Harold Fisch and Thomas Goddard Bergin) Imprint Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press; B. Croce. 1913. The Philosophy of Giambattista Vico. Translated by R.G. Collingwood. London; I. Berlin. 1976. Vico and Herder: Two studies in the history of ideas. The Hogarth Press; I. Berlin. 1979. ‘Vico’s Concept of Knowledge’, in Against the current: Essays in the History of Ideas (H. Hardy ed.), pp. 111-119 (originally published in 1969); I. Berlin. 1979. ‘Vico and the Ideal of the Enlightenment’, in Against the current: Essays in the History of Ideas (H. Hardy ed.), pp. 120-129 (originally published in 1976); I. Berlin. 1990. ‘Giambattista Vico and Cultural History’, in The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas (H. Hardy ed.), pp. 49-69 (originally published in 1983); B.A. Haddock. 1986.Vico's Political Thought. Swansea; L. Pompa. (ed.). 1982. Vico: Selected Writings. CUP; L. Pompa. 1990. Vico: A study of the ‘New Science’. CUP; B.A. Haddock. 1995. ‘Vico, Collingwood and the Character of a Historical Philosophy’, in PHC, pp. 130-151. Also F. Copleston. 1960. A History of Philosophy, (Vol. Bums6). & Oates (Part III “The rise of the philosophy of history”, pp. 150-179. On Giambattista Vico pp. 154-163). For more details on the work of Dilthev see: W. Dilthey. 1883. Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften. (Introduction to the Human Sciences, edited, with an introduction, by Rudolf A. Makkreel and Frithjof Rodi, 1989, Princeton University Press); M. Ermarth. 1978.Wilhelm Dilthey: The Critique of Historical Reason. Chicago; J. Owensby. 1994.Dilthey and the Narrative of History. Ithaca, N Y ; T. Plantinga. 1980. Historical Understanding in the Thought of Wilhelm Dilthey. Toronto; H.P. Rickman. 1961. Meaning in History: W. Diltheys's thoughts on history and society, (edited and introduced by Rickman) London: Allen & Unwin; H.P. Rickman (ed.). 1976. Wilhelm Dilthey: Selected Writings. Cambridge; H.P. Rickman. 1979.Wilhelm Dilthey: Pioneer of the Human Studies. London. 1 INTRODUCTION the possibility of knowledge about man. Furthermore such knowledge is the necessary prerequisite, without which any further attempts of comprehending meaningfully other aspects of human life are ill founded. In his Autobiography Collingwood contends that the inability to control human situations was the reason for WWI and he believes that only “understanding of human affairs” (A, p. 92) will provide such control. It is no coincidence that Collingwood in NL adopted the structure of Hobbes and began with a section on man: the understanding of man comes first.
Recommended publications
  • Paleography and Codicology

    Paleography and Codicology

    Paleography and Codicology: A Seminar on Medieval Manuscript Studies Instructor: Timothy C. Graham June 4-28, 2018 Institute for Medieval Studies University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131 Course content Providing a comprehensive orientation to the field of medieval manuscript studies, this seminar is targeted at graduate students and will also be of in- terest to junior faculty who wish to improve their background in the field. Over the four weeks of the seminar, participants will learn to recognize and read a broad range of medieval scripts and will receive a detailed in- troduction to the entire process of manuscript production, from the prepa- ration of parchment or paper through the stages of writing, decorating, correcting, and glossing the text to the binding and storage of the com- pleted codex. Medieval conventions of punctuation and abbreviation will receive special attention, as will specific genres of manuscripts, including Bibles, Books of Hours, maps, calendars, and rolls and scrolls. Partici- pants will also learn how to recognize and interpret the types of evidence that can help to establish a manuscript’s origin and provenance; they will receive a grounding in the conventions of manuscript cataloguing and an introduction to the science of textual editing. The seminar will focus on manuscripts written in Latin; a basic knowledge of Latin is therefore a prerequisite. Format The seminar will meet for formal sessions on four mornings of each week, Monday through Thursday, 9:30 a.m.–12:30 p.m. During the afternoons, the instructor will make himself available for consultation; he will also hold occasional workshops on specific topics and anticipates that partici- pants may wish to meet regularly for guided group transcription sessions.
  • The Role of Archival and Manuscript Research in the Investigation of Translator Decision-Making

    The Role of Archival and Manuscript Research in the Investigation of Translator Decision-Making

    This is a repository copy of The role of archival and manuscript research in the investigation of translator decision-making. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/84758/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Munday, J (2013) The role of archival and manuscript research in the investigation of translator decision-making. Target, 25 (1). 125 - 139. ISSN 0924-1884 https://doi.org/10.1075/target.25.1.10mun Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ The role of archival and manuscript research in the investigation of translator decision-making Jeremy Munday, University of Leeds, UK Abstract This paper discusses the application of research methodologies from history and literary studies to the analysis of the translation process.
  • THE VOLUNTARY SIMPLICITY MOVEMENT a Multi-National Survey Analysis in Theoretical Context

    THE VOLUNTARY SIMPLICITY MOVEMENT a Multi-National Survey Analysis in Theoretical Context

    ! 3 THE VOLUNTARY SIMPLICITY MOVEMENT A multi-national survey analysis in theoretical context Superfluous wealth can buy superfluities only. – Henry Thoreau 1. Introduction The Voluntary Simplicity Movement can be understood broadly as a diverse social movement made up of people who are resisting high consumption lifestyles and who are seeking, in various ways, a lower consumption but higher quality of life alternative (Grigsby, 2004; Alexander, 2009, 2011a). In 2011 a multi-national online survey was launched for the purpose of gaining empirical insight into this ‘post- consumerist’ social movement. Presently 2268 participants in the movement have completed our 50-question survey and that makes it by far the most extensive sociological examination of the movement available (Elgin and Mitchell, 1977; Schor, 1998; Pierce, 2000; Kasser, 2002; Craig-Lees and Hill, 2002; Grigsby, 2004; Brown and Kasser, 2005; Hamilton and Denniss, 2005). This chapter presents a foundational analysis of these survey results.1 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 This chapter is a lightly revised version of the paper that appeared in the Journal of Consumer Culture (2012), co-authored by Samuel Alexander and Simon Ussher. Although the original paper was based on 2268 participants, at the time of writing this revised version (March 2015) that number had grown to 3708 participants. The results have not changed in any significant way by these extra participants, however to remain consistent with the peer-reviewed paper the results below remain based on 2268 participants. The survey is still open, collecting more data. See here: 37 SAMUEL ALEXANDER 2. Why Examine the Voluntary Simplicity Movement? Before turning to the survey and its results, we wish to provide some theoretical context to this research by outlining briefly why we chose to examine the Voluntary Simplicity Movement (hereafter, the ‘Simplicity Movement’).
  • Studies on Collingwood, History and Civilization

    Studies on Collingwood, History and Civilization

    Studies on Collingwood, History and Civilization Jan van der Dussen Studies on Collingwood, History and Civilization Jan van der Dussen Heerlen , The Netherlands ISBN 978-3-319-20671-4 ISBN 978-3-319-20672-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20672-1 Library of Congress Control Number: 2015951386 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. Printed on acid-free paper Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www. springer.com) Acknowledgements The following four essays are reproduced from their original publication.
  • Emergentism As an Option in the Philosophy of Religion: Between Materialist Atheism and Pantheism

    Emergentism As an Option in the Philosophy of Religion: Between Materialist Atheism and Pantheism

    SURI 7 (2) 2019: 1-22 Emergentism as an Option in the Philosophy of Religion: Between Materialist Atheism and Pantheism James Franklin University of New South Wales Abstract: Among worldviews, in addition to the options of materialist atheism, pantheism and personal theism, there exists a fourth, “local emergentism”. It holds that there are no gods, nor does the universe overall have divine aspects or any purpose. But locally, in our region of space and time, the properties of matter have given rise to entities which are completely different from matter in kind and to a degree god-like: consciousnesses with rational powers and intrinsic worth. The emergentist option is compared with the standard alternatives and the arguments for and against it are laid out. It is argued that, among options in the philosophy of religion, it involves the minimal reworking of the manifest image of common sense. Hence it deserves a place at the table in arguments as to the overall nature of the universe. Keywords: Emergence; pantheism; personal theism; naturalism; consciousness 1. INTRODUCTION The main options among world views are normally classifiable as either materialist atheism, pantheism (widely understood) or personal theism. According to materialist atheism, there exists nothing except the material universe as we ordinarily conceive it, and its properties are fully described by science (present or future). According to personal theism, there exists a separate entity (or entities) of a much higher form than those found in the 2019 Philosophical Association of the Philippines 2 Emergentism as an Option in the Philosophy of Religion material universe, a god or gods.
  • Instructions to Authors and Guidelines for Manuscript Submission

    Instructions to Authors and Guidelines for Manuscript Submission

    Instructions to Authors and Guidelines for Manuscript Submission 1 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Objectives and readership 1.2 Contents 1.2.1 Original research articles 1.2.2 Reviews 1.2.3 Special reports 1.2.4 Opinion and analysis 1.2.5 Brief communications 1.2.6 Current topics 1.2.7 Letters to the editor 1.3 Language 1.4 Guidelines and research protocols 1.5 Ethics 1.6 Conflict of interests 1.7 Copyright 1.8 Peer review process 1.9 Dissemination 2 GUIDELINES FOR MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION 2.1 General criteria for manuscript acceptance 2.2 Manuscript specifications 2.3 Formatting requirements 2.4 Title 2.5 Authorship 2.6 Abstract and keywords page 2.7 Body of the article 2.8 Tables and figures 2.9 Submitting the manuscript 2.10 Editing the manuscript 1 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Objectives and readership The Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública/Pan American Journal of Public Health (RPSP/PAJPH) is a free-access, peer-reviewed, monthly journal, published as the flagship scientific and technical publication of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), headquartered in Washington, D.C., United States of America. Its mission is to serve as an important vehicle for disseminating scientific public health information of international significance, mainly in areas related to PAHO's essential mission to strengthen national and local health systems and improve the health of the peoples of the Americas. To this end, the RPSP/PAJPH publishes materials that reflect PAHO's main strategic objectives and programmatic areas: health and human development, health promotion and protection, prevention and control of communicable and chronic diseases, maternal and child health, gender and women's health, mental health, violence, nutrition, environmental health, disaster management, development of health systems and services, social determinants of health, and health equity.
  • HOW to WRITE a GOOD MANUSCRIPT Ready?

    HOW to WRITE a GOOD MANUSCRIPT Ready?

    HOW TO WRITE A GOOD MANUSCRIPT Ready? Am I ready to write a paper? • What was my original hypothesis? • Do my data answer the question? • Are the data sufficient to support the conclusion? • Are the experiments reproducible? • Are my findings novel? Get set… What type of article shall I write? • Full Length • substantial and complete • Letter or Short Communication • short and quick • early communication of significant findings Choose journal • Where have most of my references been published? • Does my study fit the scope of the journal? • Read the Author Guidelines! Go! Manuscript structure Order of Preparation 1. Title and abstract 1. Tables, figures and figure 2. Introduction legends 3. Material and Methods* 2. Material and Methods 4. Results 3. Results 5. Discussion and 4. Discussion and Conclusion Conclusion 5. Introduction 6. References 6. Title and abstract 7. Tables, figures and figure 7. References legends * In some journals Material and Methods are placed just before the References Figures What is the best way to present my data? • Table • Keep it simple! • If it is not central to the main narrative, place it in the supplementary material • Give it a title • Graph or chart • Needs to be clear and self-explanatory • Don’t forget to label axes! • Don’t forget the error bars • If the result can be explained in one simple sentence, then a graph is probably not needed • Image • Good resolution (check Author Guidelines) • Label appropriately • Provide details in the figure legends CONTROLS ARE IMPORTANT! Material and Methods Your work
  • Chapter One Historiography and Sources

    Chapter One Historiography and Sources

    CHAPTER ONE HISTORIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES Publications devoted to the writing of library history in the United States date from the 1950s but did not begin to appear with regularity until the latter stages of the 1970s. Articles on the "value of library history" have been produced by Jesse H. Shera (1952, 1.12), Haynes McMullen (1952, 1.11), Raymond Irwin (1958, 1.17), Louis Shores (1961, 1.26), and John C. Colson (1969, 1.44) and collectively constitute a genre in their own right. More traditional contributions reviewing and evaluating the literature stem from classic essays by Felix Reichmann ("Historical Research and Library Science," 1964, 1.29) and Sidney L. Jackson ("Materials for Teaching Library History in the U.S.A.," 1972, 1.76). These were followed by two fine articles on public library historiography by Sidney Ditzion and Francis Miksa, respectively (1973, 1.82; 1982, 1.139); overviews of the literature encompassing academic, public, and private libraries as well as key individuals and landmark publications by Shera (1973, 1.87) and Colson (1976, 1.100); general analyses of recent scholarship by David Kaser (1978, 1.121) and Lee Shiflett (1984, 1.145); and a statistical and analytical study of the historical monograph from 1975 to 1985 by Laurel A. Grotzinger (1986, 1.155). Thematic and methodological issues came under the scrutiny of Michael H. Harris (1975, 1.97; 1976, 1.105; 1986, 1.157), Elaine Fain (1979, 1.128), Wayne A. Wiegand (1983, 1.143), and Robert V. Williams (1984, 1.147). Interpretive concerns, in particular, dominated the writings of Harris, an avowed revisionist, and were featured with rejoinders in two issues of the Journal of Library History (vol.
  • History of Analytic Philosophy

    History of Analytic Philosophy

    History of Analytic Philosophy Series Editor Michael Beaney Humboldt University Berlin King’s College London Berlin, Germany Series editor: Michael Beaney, Professor für Geschichte der analytischen Philosophie, Institut für Philosophie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany, and Regius Professor of Logic, School of Divinity, History and Philosophy, University of Aberdeen, Scotland. Editorial board members: Claudio de Almeida, Pontifcal Catholic University at Porto Alegre, Brazil Maria Baghramian, University College Dublin, Ireland Thomas Baldwin, University of York, England Stewart Candlish, University of Western Australia Chen Bo, Peking University, China Jonathan Dancy, University of Reading, England José Ferreirós, University of Seville, Spain Michael Friedman, Stanford University, USA Gottfried Gabriel, University of Jena, Germany Juliet Floyd, Boston University, USA Hanjo Glock, University of Zurich, Switzerland Nicholas Griffn, McMaster University, Canada Leila Haaparanta, University of Tampere, Finland Peter Hylton, University of Illinois, USA Jiang Yi, Beijing Normal University, China Javier Legris, National Academy of Sciences of Buenos Aires, Argentina Cheryl Misak, University of Toronto, Canada Nenad Miscevic, University of Maribor, Slovenia, and Central European University, Budapest Volker Peckhaus, University of Paderborn, Germany Eva Picardi, University of Bologna, Italy Erich Reck, University of California at Riverside, USA Peter Simons, Trinity College, Dublin Thomas Uebel, University of Manchester, England More information
  • Manuscript Afterlives

    Manuscript Afterlives

    MANUSCRIPT AFTERLIVES A Working Handlist of Medieval Binding Fragments in the Collections of Stanford University Libraries Based on initial research by the students in History 14N: Making the Middle Ages (Spring 2019) Final Report compiled by: Mateo Attanasio ‘22 Austin Brotman ‘22 Prof. Rowan Dorin (History) Date Submitted: January 2020 Countless fragments of medieval manuscripts are preserved in the bindings of later books, whether as covers, pastedowns, or binding stubs. Such re-use was an especially common practice in the early centuries of print, thought it persisted well into the modern period. Even when the contents of a manuscript were deemed unimportant, its parchment pages were too valuable to be simply discarded. Modern libraries and private collections bear the fruits of this frugality, and in recent years scholars have begun to pay increasing attention to these “books within books.” In this spirit, the students of History 14N: Making the Middle Ages (Spring 2019) hunted through the collections of the Stanford University Libraries in search of medieval binding fragments. Working under the direction of Professor Rowan Dorin, and with the enthusiastic support of Special Collections staff members, the seminar participants analyzed dozens of volumes whose existing catalog entries hinted at the possible presence of such fragments. The students then worked to decipher the visible text and (where possible) identify the contents and origins of the fragments. The results were then collated and corrected over the course of the following summer and fall, ultimately producing this working handlist. To date, our collective efforts have identified forty-nine examples of bindings with visible reuse of medieval manuscript fragments.
  • Nber Working Paper Series

    Nber Working Paper Series

    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES REEVALUATING THE MODERNIZATION HYPOTHESIS Daron Acemoglu Simon Johnson James A. Robinson Pierre Yared Working Paper 13334 http://www.nber.org/papers/w13334 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 August 2007 We are grateful for the comments and suggestions of José Antionio Cheibub, Jorge Dominguez, Peter Hall, and Susan Stokes. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2007 by Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, James A. Robinson, and Pierre Yared. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Reevaluating the Modernization Hypothesis Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, James A. Robinson, and Pierre Yared NBER Working Paper No. 13334 August 2007 JEL No. O10,P16 ABSTRACT This paper revisits and critically reevaluates the widely-accepted modernization hypothesis which claims that per capita income causes the creation and the consolidation of democracy. We argue that existing studies find support for this hypothesis because they fail to control for the presence of omitted variables. There are many underlying historical factors that affect both the level of income per capita and the likelihood of democracy in a country, and failing to control for these factors may introduce a spurious relationship between income and democracy. We show that controlling for these historical factors by including fixed country effects removes the correlation between income and democracy, as well as the correlation between income and the likelihood of transitions to and from democratic regimes.
  • Transition Towns Movement, Which Is One of the More Promising Social Movements to Emerge During the Last Decade in Response to the Overlapping Problems Outlined Above

    Transition Towns Movement, Which Is One of the More Promising Social Movements to Emerge During the Last Decade in Response to the Overlapping Problems Outlined Above

    ! 11 THE TRANSITION MOVEMENT Questions of diversity, power, and affluence 1. Introduction1 As the global economy continues to degrade planetary ecosystems (Rockstrom et al., 2009); as biodiversity continues to decline (United Nations, 2010); as climate scientists offer increasingly confident and dire warnings (IPCC, 2013); as peak oil arrives (Miller and Sorrell, 2014; Brecha, 2013); as fresh water and other key resources become scarcer (Brown, 2011) while population continues to grow (UNDSEA, 2012); and as financial systems continue to show signs of instability (Tverberg, 2012), the question of how nations around the world are going to ‘transition’ to a stable, just, and sustainable society is more pressing than ever. Things seem to be getting worse, not better, which calls for new thinking and new action, both at the personal and social levels, but also at the macroeconomic and political levels. If early in the environmental movement it was assumed that buying ‘green’ products, switching to energy efficient light bulbs, and taking shorter showers were the ‘lifestyle’ solutions to environmental problems, more recent evidence firmly indicates that such measures are not working or are not going to be anywhere near sufficient, necessary though they may be. The extent of ecological overshoot is too great (Global Footprint Network, 2013). Furthermore, many promised efficiency gains that were supposed to flow from technological advances seem to be getting lost to the Jevons Paradox and rebound effects (Herring and Sorrell, 2009; Polimeni et al., 2009), meaning that technology – the !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 This chapter is a lightly revised version of Simplicity Institute Report 14g, co-authored by Samuel Alexander and Esther Alloun.